Skip to main content
Microbial Biotechnology logoLink to Microbial Biotechnology
. 2016 Sep 14;9(6):801–813. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12402

Tyrosine decarboxylase activity of Enterococcus mundtii: new insights into phenotypic and genetic aspects

Veronica Gatto 1, Giulia Tabanelli 2, Chiara Montanari 3, Valentina Prodomi 1, Eleonora Bargossi 2, Sandra Torriani 1,, Fausto Gardini 2,3
PMCID: PMC5072196  PMID: 27624853

Summary

Few information is available about the tyraminogenic potential of the species Enterococcus mundtii. In this study, two plant‐derived strains of E. mundtii were selected and investigated to better understand the phenotypic behaviour and the genetic mechanisms involved in tyramine accumulation. Both the strains accumulated tyramine from the beginning of exponential phase of growth, independently on the addition of tyrosine to the medium. The strains accumulated also 2‐phenylethylamine, although with lower efficiency and in greater extent when tyrosine was not added. Accordingly, the tyrosine decarboxylase (tyrDC) gene expression level increased during the exponential phase with tyrosine added, while it remained constant and high without precursor. The genetic organization as well as sequence identity levels of tyrDC and tyrosine permease (tyrP) genes indicated a correlation with those of phylogenetically closer enterococcal species, such as E. faecium, E. hirae and E. durans; however, the gene Na+/H+ antiporter (nhaC) that usually follow tyrP is missing. In addition, BLAST analysis revealed the presence of additional genes encoding for decarboxylase and permease in the genome of several E. mundtii strains. It is speculated the occurrence of a duplication event and the acquisition of different specificity for these enzymes that deserves further investigations.

Introduction

Tyramine is a biogenic amine (BA) deriving from tyrosine decarboxylation and can have severe acute effects if ingested in excessive amounts with food, consisting in peripheral vasoconstriction, increased cardiac output, accelerated respiration, elevated blood glucose and release of norepinephrine, symptoms known also as ‘cheese reaction’ (Shalaby, 1994; McCabe‐Sellers et al., 2006; Marcobal et al., 2012). Tyrosine decarboxylase, the enzyme responsible for tyramine production, can use as substrate also phenylalanine, producing 2‐phenylethylamine, whose adverse effects are similar to tyramine (Marcobal et al., 2006).

In general, the amino acid decarboxylation leading to BA formation provides metabolic energy and/or resistance against acid stress (Molenaar et al., 1993; Fernández and Zúñiga, 2006; Pereira et al., 2009). The microorganisms responsible for tyramine accumulation in foods belong mainly to the group of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) (Marcobal et al., 2012). Among LAB, species belonging to the genus Enterococcus are recognized as the most frequent and intensive tyramine producers (Leuschner et al., 1999; Suzzi and Gardini, 2003; Ladero et al., 2012).

Due to their salt and pH tolerance, and to their ability to grow over a wide temperature range, enterococci are isolated from different habitats and are often contaminants in food of animal origin, such as cheese and sausages (Giraffa, 2003; Franz et al., 2011). In spite of their homolactic metabolism, their potential role in cheese ripening and their ability to produce bacteriocins (Beshkova and Frengova, 2012; Fontana et al., 2015), enterococci have a controversial status and they are often considered at the crossroad of food safety (Franz et al., 1999). In fact, this group is considered as indicator of the hygienic quality of raw material and food, as well as marker of faecal contamination (Leclerc et al., 1996). In addition, virulence factors can be present (Foulquié Moreno et al., 2006; Hollenbeck and Rice, 2012) and they can act as opportunistic human pathogens frequently associated with nosocomial infections due to their antibiotic resistance with a high capacity to disseminate this resistance to other microorganisms (Giraffa, 2002; Klein, 2003; Rossi et al., 2014). Furthermore, they are strong tyramine producers and this ability has been deeply exploited in Enterococcus faecalis (in which tyramine production is considered a species trait), Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus durans (Linares et al., 2009; Ladero et al., 2012; Bargossi et al., 2015a,b). For this reasons, the presence of enterococci has been put in relation with the presence of tyramine in several fermented foods, such as fermented sausages (Gardini et al., 2008), cheeses (Linares et al., 2011) and wine (Pérez‐Martín et al., 2014). The enterococcal species most frequently isolated from fermented foods are E. faecalis and E. faecium, and also E. durans, Enterococcus gallinarum, Enterococcus casseliflavus, Enterococcus hirae can be found in food matrices (Franz et al., 2003; Giraffa, 2003; Foulquié Moreno et al., 2006; Corsetti et al., 2007; Komprda et al., 2008). Recently, also E. mundtii has been isolated from the food chain; it is a non‐motile, yellow‐pigmented enterococcus infrequently associated to human infection (Collins et al., 1986; Higashide et al., 2005). Strains of E. mundtii have been isolated from soy and cereals (Todorov et al., 2005; Corsetti et al., 2007), water (Moore et al., 2008; Graves and Weaver, 2010; Furtula et al., 2013), soil (Collins et al., 1986; Bigwood et al., 2012) and forage grass or silage, in which this species is often the predominant among enterococci (Muller et al., 2001; Ni et al., 2015). It has also been isolated from animals (Collins et al., 1986; Espeche et al., 2014) and from food (Vera Pingitore et al., 2012; Schöbitz et al., 2014). This species has been deeply studied in relation to the bacteriocin produced, among which mundticine (De Kwaadsteniet et al., 2005; Todorov et al., 2005; Corsetti et al., 2007; Feng et al., 2009; Vera Pingitore et al., 2012; Espeche et al., 2014).

Recently, the genome of E. mundtii QU 25, an efficient l‐lactic acid‐producing bacterium isolated from ovine faeces, has been completely sequenced (Shiwa et al., 2014), and comparative analysis of the genetic content of this species with respect to other representative enterococcal species of diverse origins was conducted (Repizo et al., 2014). Despite to those recent acquisitions, scarce information is available about E. mundtii tyraminogenic potential. Trivedi et al. (2009) carried out a study testing the ability to decarboxylate tyrosine in several enterococci isolated from different foodstuff. Regarding E. mundtii, four of five strains isolated from meat products and six of 12 isolated from vegetables and fruits possessed this ability. Also Kalhotka et al. (2012) found an E. mundtii strain able to produce tyramine and agmatine. This latter amine derives from the decarboxylation of arginine and can be transformed in putrescine by a specific deiminase (Linares et al., 2015).

In this research, the tyramine and 2‐phenylethylamine accumulation by two E. mundtii strains isolated from grass silage was studied during their growth in a rich medium. In addition, information on the genetic basis of the tyraminogenic potential of E. mundtii were obtained analysing the expression of the tyrosine decarboxylase (tyrDC) gene, the sequence of tyrDC and tyrosine permease (tyrP) genes, and the genetic organization of the TDC operon region.

Results and discussion

Tyramine‐positive enterococci

In the first part of the research, 35 isolates of coccal LAB, originating from different agricultural foodstuffs (Fig. 1) and positive for the production of tyramine according to the method of Bover‐Cid and Holzapfel medium (Bover‐Cid and Holzapfel, 1999) were considered. These isolates were presumptively identified as enterococci based on their physiological and morphological characteristics (von Wright and Axelsson, 2012). They were cocci, Gram‐positive, catalase‐negative, non‐spore‐forming and occurring both as single cells and in chains. They were able to growth at 10°C and 45°C, at pH 4.4 and 9.6, and in the presence of 6.5% of NaCl.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

UPGMA dendrogram derived from RAPD‐PCR‐fingerprinting patterns of all the 35 isolates using the primer 1254. Code and source of the isolates are indicated on the right‐hand side of the figure. The vertical dotted line indicates the 60% similarity level that delineates the species E. mundtii (cluster I), E. faecalis (cluster II) and E. faecium (cluster III). Isolates marked with * were identified by phenylalanyl‐tRNA synthase α‐subunit (pheS) gene sequence analysis. G: maize grain; GS: maize grain silage; LS: lucerne silage; M: whole crop maize; MS: whole crop maize silage; R: ryegrass; RS: ryegrass silage; SC: starter cultures for silage.

To confirm the decarboxylase activity revealed by the Bover‐Cid and Holzapfel medium, the occurrence of the gene tyrDC, coding for tyrosine decarboxylase (TDC), was examined. A tyrDC gene fragment was amplified according to Torriani et al. (2008). For all the 35 isolates, the 336 bp amplicon was obtained, confirming their tyraminogenic potential.

Successively, RAPD‐PCR fingerprinting technique with the primer 1254 (Table 1) was applied to investigate the genetic diversity of the strains. This molecular typing method has proved to be reliable, discriminative and suitable for the study of a large number of strains in short time (Vancanneyt et al., 2002). The primer 1254 generated reproducible RAPD‐PCR fingerprints thanks to an accurate standardization of all the PCR and electrophoresis conditions. The reproducibility of PCR assays and running conditions, estimated by analysis of duplicate DNA extracts of several strains, was higher than 90%. Cluster analysis of the RAPD‐PCR fingerprints grouped the 35 isolates in three clusters (Fig. 1). Seven strains, all originated from ryegrass silage except one (C46), were grouped in the cluster I, four strains from ryegrass and maize grain silages belonged to the cluster II and, finally, 24 strains from different foodstuffs were clustered in the group III.

Table 1.

Primers used in this study in RAPD‐PCR, RT‐qPCR and conventional PCR reactions and expected amplicon size

PCR type Target Primer code Sequence (5′‐3′) Amplicon (pb) Reference
RAPD‐PCR Arbitrary DNA sequences 1254 CCG CAG CCA A Variable Akopyanz et al. (1992)
RT‐qPCR tyrDC TYR3f CGT ACA CAT TCA GTT GCA TGG CAT 171 Torriani et al. (2008)
TYR4r ATG TCC TAC TTC TTC TTC CAT TTG
Conventional tyrDC DEC5 CGT TGT TGG TGT TGT TGG CAC NAC NGA RGA RG 350
DEC3 CCG CCA GCA GAA TAT GGA AYR TAN CCC AT
pheS pheS‐21‐F CAY CCN GCH CGY GAY ATG C 455 Naser et al. (2005)
pheS‐22‐R CCW ARV CCR AAR GCA AAR CC
tyrS/tyrDC TyrS‐F1 GGA GCT ATA AGT ATT AAC GGT GA 940 Bargossi et al. (2015a)
Tdc‐R1 GAT TT(A/G) ATG TT(A/G) CG(G/C) GCA TAC CA
tyrDC Tdc‐F2 CAA ATG GAA GAA GAA GT(A/T) GGA 1340
Tdc‐R2 CC(A/G/T) GCA CG(G/T) T(C/T)C CAT TCT TC
tyrDC/tyrP Tdc‐F3 CCA GA(C/T) TAT GGC AA(C/T) AGC CCA 788
TyrP‐R3 CCT AAA GTA GAA GC(A/G) ACC AT
tyrP TyrP‐F4 TGG GTG CAA ATG TTC CCA GG 940
TyrP‐R4 ACC (A/G)AT TCG (A/G)TA AGG ACG
tyrP/nhaC‐2 TyrP‐F5 (A/T)CT GCT TGG GT(A/T) ACT GGA CC na
NhaC‐R5 CAT (C/T)GC AT(C/T) (A/G)T(C/T) GAA TCC AAG

na, no amplicon.

For each cluster, some representative isolates were chosen to proceed with their identification at the species level by the pheS gene analysis. Indeed, this gene is considered a reliable genomic marker for differentiating the species within the genus Enterococcus, and it was demonstrated to be much more discriminatory than 16S rRNA (Naser et al., 2005). The pheS gene has a high degree of homogeneity among strains of the same enterococcal species (at least 97% sequence similarity), whereas distinct species reveal at maximum 86% gene sequence similarity. The pheS partial gene sequence data obtained indicated that the strains C46, C53 and C77, grouped in the cluster I, can be assigned to the species E. mundtii (99–100% identity), the strain E599 (cluster II) to E. faecalis (100% identity), while the strains E175, G52 and C5 (cluster III) to E. faecium (100% identity). After that, the analysis of the pheS gene was extended to all the isolates of cluster I, thus confirming their belonging to the E. mundtii species.

These results confirmed the tyrosine decarboxylase potential of E. faecalis and E. faecium, the stronger tyramine producers (Aymerich et al., 2006; Bonetta et al., 2008; Gardini et al., 2008; Ladero et al., 2012; Marcobal et al., 2012). On the other hand, tyramine production is considered a species characteristic of E. faecalis (Ladero et al., 2012). In addition, the tyraminogenic potential of E. durans has been deeply studied (Fernández et al., 2007; Linares et al., 2009). Regarding E. mundtii, scarce are the studies on their capability to accumulate tyramine and the genetic aspects involved in its accumulations. Kalhotka et al. (2012) investigated the decarboxylase activity of enterococci isolated from goat milk and found that all of the tested strains, identified as E. mundtii, E. faecium and E. durans, showed significant tyrosine and arginine decarboxylase activity, in relation to temperature and duration of cultivation. In addition, Trivedi et al. (2009) studied the ability to decarboxylate tyrosine in many enterococcal strains isolated from different foodstuffs and found that more than 90% of isolates showed the presence of the gene tyrDC. In particular, these authors found that 10 of 17 E. mundtii strains were tyramine producers. These preliminary studies indicated the occurrence of tyramine‐producing E. mundtii strains, but did not highlight the tyraminogenic potential of this species. Moreover, the molecular aspects involved in the tyramine biosynthesis have not yet studied in depth. For this reason, two of the E. mundtii strains considered here were chosen as targets for investigating their tyramine accumulation capability and tyrosine metabolism. In particular, the two strains C53 and C46 were selected on the basis of their different origin and genetic diversity. Indeed, these strains have limited genetic similarity, belonging to different RAPD‐PCR subclusters, as shown in Fig. 1; in addition, C53 was the sole E. mundtii strain of the collection that originated from lucerne silage.

Growth parameters and tyramine production of Enterococcus mundtii strains

The growth of the strains E. mundtii C46 and C53 was monitored by measuring the OD600 increase in BHI medium added or not with tyrosine. The OD600 changes were modelled with the Gompertz equation (Zwietering et al., 1990) and the estimates of the parameters are reported in Table 2. All the parameters were characterized by a high significance (P ≤ 0.05). Both the strains reached the maximum value of OD600 (A), ranging between 1.11 and 1.27, after 6–8 h incubation at 37°C. The curves presented a very short lag phase (λ), followed by a sharp increase of OD600. As far as A and λ, no marked differences were found among the two strains, while E. mundtii C53 presented a lower maximum OD600 increase rate in exponential phase (μ max). Moreover, the addition of tyrosine generally determined lower values of A, higher values of μ max and a shorter lag phase. Table 2 reports also the cell counts detected at beginning of the stationary phase. The models obtained are graphically represented in Fig. 2, which reports the growth curves in the first 24 h of incubation. As a reference, the same figure shows also the growth curves obtained under the same conditions by Bargossi et al. (2015b) for E. faecalis EF37, a strong tyramine producer (Gardini et al., 2008), which exhibited analogous behaviours.

Table 2.

Gompertz equation parameters for enterococcal growth measured as OD600. R 2 is given as diagnostics of the regression. The maximum cell concentrations (expressed as log CFU ml−1) at the beginning of the stationary phase is reported. The standard deviation is reported within parentheses

Strain Cultural medium Gompertz equation parametersa R 2 Maximum cell concentration
A μ max λ
C46 BHI + tyrb 1.153 (± 0.029) 0.635 (± 0.079) 1.771 (± 0.119) 0.994 9.09 (± 0.04)
BHI 1.269 (± 0.036) 0.615 (± 0.077) 2.556 (± 0.132) 0.994 9.06 (± 0.01)
C53 BHI + tyr 1.113 (± 0.037) 0.594 (± 0.101) 2.024 (± 0.177) 0.990 9.01 (± 0.02)
BHI 1.215 (± 0.028) 0.563 (± 0.060) 2.345 (± 0.121) 0.996 8.97 (± 0.05)
a

A: maximum OD600 value reached; μ max: maximum OD600 increase rate in exponential phase (OD600/h); λ: lag phase duration (h).

b

BHI broth plus 1 g l−1 tyrosine.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Growth curves of E. mundtii C46 (A) and E. mundtii C53 (B) obtained according to the Gompertz parameters reported in Table 2. The growth was obtained in BHI not added (solid line) or added (dotted line) with tyrosine. As a comparison, also the growth curves obtained under the same conditions for the strain E. faecalis EF37 (C) are reported, according to the data of Bargossi et al. (2015b).

The production of tyramine by E. mundtii C46 and C53 during their growth in BHI, added or not with the precursor, is shown in Table 3, which reports also the accumulation of 2‐phenylethylamine. Also in this case, the data already available for E. faecalis EF37 (Bargossi et al., 2015b) are reported. It is well known that enterococci can decarboxylate phenylalanine producing 2‐phenylethylamine through the activity of the same decarboxylase. The characteristics of this BA are very similar to tyramine, but it is produced with a lower efficiency (Marcobal et al., 2006).

Table 3.

OD600 and tyramine (TYR) and 2‐phenylethylamine (2‐PHE) production by E. mundtii C53 and C46 during their growth in BHI, added or not with 1% tyrosine. It is also reported the production of TYR and 2‐PHE by E. faecalis EF37 strain (adapted from Bargossi et al., 2015b). The standard deviations are reported within parentheses

Time (h) E. mundtii C53 E. mundtii C46 E. faecalis EF37a
BHI BHI + 0.1% tyrosine BHI BHI + 0.1% tyrosine BHI BHI + 0.1% tyrosine
OD600 b TYR (mg l−1) 2‐PHE (mg l−1) OD600 TYR (mg l−1) 2‐PHE (mg l−1) OD600 TYR (mg l−1) 2‐PHE (mg l−1) OD600 TYR (mg l−1) 2‐PHE (mg l−1) OD600 TYR (mg l−1) 2‐PHE (mg l−1) OD600 TYR (mg l−1) 2‐PHE (mg l−1)
2 0.000 8.35 (± 0.41) c 0.000 20.31 (± 0.32) 0.004 7.14 (± 0.19) 0.167 15.66 (± 0.65) 0.059 n.d.d n.d. 0.000 n.d. n.d.
3 0.367 21.30 (± 1.12) 0.575 42.18 (± 1.05) 0.279 21.56 (± 0.72) 0.748 72.89 (± 2.04) 0.575 n.d. n.d. 0.359 n.d. n.d.
4 0.865 32.16 (± 1.84) 0.953 64.88 (± 1.54) 0.846 36.59 (± 0.08) 1.047 130.34 (± 2.56) 0.913 n.d. n.d. 0.851 n.d. n.d.
5 1.103 46.29 (± 1.70) 1.073 93.59 (± 2.32) 1.139 61.37 (± 1.81) 1.128 189.87 (± 3.63) 1.004 n.d. n.d. 0.936 n.d. n.d.
8 1.212 72.25 (± 2.31) 1.112 221.25 (± 5.48) 1.267 97.55 (± 2.50) 4.80 (± 0.06) 1.153 396.36 (± 3.68) 1.029 11.65 (± 1.75) 39.67 (± 1.71) 0.947 503.75 (± 6.16) 85.21 (± 2.12)
24 1.215 101.71 (± 3.44) 11.77 (± 0.48) 1.113 508.88 (± 5.93) 4.07 (± 0.80) 1.269 112.33 (± 4.32) 33.24 (± 1.24) 1.153 630.09 (± 4.75) 6.72 (± 0.74) 1.029 90.97 (± 6.71) 177.10 (± 5.46) 0.947 536.16 (± 4.32) 295.61 (± 5.75)
48 1.215 116.73 (± 6.78) 32.52 (± 0.87) 1.113 691.44 (± 8.49) 6.91 (± 0.22) 1.269 121.42 (± 0.96) 63.21 (± 3.09) 1.153 770.35 (± 7.06) 14.84 (± 0.95) 1.029 69.64 (± 2.93) 213.79 (± 7.25) 0.947 551.40 (± 4.43) 405.80 (± 6.17)
72 1.215 129.12 (± 4.09) 56.26 (± 0.94) 1.113 757.43 (± 3.69) 24.59 (± 0.65) 1.269 127.57 (± 1.24) 91.00 (± 2.16) 1.153 781.50 (± 5.83) 43.46 (± 1.92) 1.029 68.30 (± 4.88) 262.45 (± 6.87) 0.947 513.94 (± 5.65) 428.50 (± 4.91)
96 1.215 134.15 (± 2.11) 75.63 (± 1.68) 1.113 766.57 (± 9.91) 20.55 (± 0.71) 1.269 129.46 (± 1.68) 108.56 (± 3.82) 1.153 797.28 (± 9.95) 44.94 (± 2.16) 1.029 n.d. n.d. 0.947 n.d. n.d.
a

Adapted from Bargossi et al. (2015b).

b

Optical density at the different sampling time as predicted by the Gompertz model (Table 2).

c

Under the detection limit (0.5 mg l−1).

d

n.d., not determined.

In all the tested conditions, the two E. mundtii strains were able to accumulate tyramine independently on the addition of tyrosine. In fact, the decarboxylase activity was detected also in the medium not supplemented with tyrosine, because BHI contains amino acid sources (proteins and peptides) among which precursors for TDC. This observation was previously reported by Bargossi et al. (2015b) for E. faecalis and E. faecium grown in the media BHI and Bover‐Cid and Holzapfel.

The data showed that the two E. mundtii strains began to produce tyramine after 2 h from the inoculum, both in the presence and in the absence of the precursor, and they continued to gradually accumulate tyramine during their stationary phase. In all the conditions, the maximum tyramine concentration was reached after 48 h for the strain C46 and after 72 h for the strain C53. However, the final amount of tyramine was similar for both the strains. In fact, it did not exceed 135 mg l−1 in BHI medium, while in the presence of tyrosine, the final amount of tyramine was about 767 and 797 mg l−1 for the strains C53 and C46 respectively. As reported in Table 3, Bargossi et al. (2015b) found that E. faecalis EF37 under the same conditions after 8 h reached the maximum tyramine concentration in the presence of tyramine added. The E. mundtii strains showed a slower tyramine production kinetics, but the final amount was significantly higher than E. faecalis EF37 (approximately 500 mg l−1). In the absence of tyrosine added, the strain E. mundtii C46 was characterized by a faster tyramine accumulation in BHI. The major differences between E. faecalis EF37 and the E. mundtii strains were in the ability to accumulate 2‐phenylethylamine, which was dramatically higher in E. faecalis. These amounts were higher than those reported by Liu et al. (2013) who, testing the tyraminogenic potential of E. faecalis strains from water‐boiled salted duck, found concentrations of tyramine lower than 330 mg l−1 in MRS broth added with 0.1% tyrosine.

The two E. mundtii strains were also able to decarboxylate phenylalanine leading to the production of 2‐phenylethylamine (Table 3). This BA was accumulated only after 24 h of growth for the strain C53, while C46 began to produce this compound already after 8 h in the absence of tyrosine. The 2‐phenylethylamine accumulation increased during subsequent incubation and reached its maximum level after 72 h with amended tyrosine and after 96 h without this amino acid. Moreover, the production of 2‐phenylethylamine was higher when tyrosine was not added to the growth medium. Indeed, in this case, concentrations of about 76 and 109 mg l−1 for E. mundtii C53 and C46, respectively, were reached, compared with concentrations lower than 45 mg l−1 in BHI when tyrosine was added to the medium. Interestingly, however, the accumulation of this BA became relevant when the tyramine concentration reached its maximum level (independently on the addition of the precursor). In any case, the amount of this BA was lower than that accumulated by E. faecium FC12 and E. faecalis EF37 (more than 400 mg l−1) grown in the same medium (Bargossi et al., 2015b). These findings could reflect the lower efficiency of the E. mundtii TDC for phenylalanine decarboxylation and could indicate that these amounts of tyramine can lower or inhibit further decarboxylase activities in the tested strains.

The continue tyramine accumulation until late stationary growth phase observed in this research could represent an advantage for the microorganism against acidification during the fermentation process and growth. In fact, the decarboxylation of amino acids has been indicated as a mechanism through which LAB and human pathogenic bacteria can resist acidic conditions (Lund et al., 2014; Romano et al., 2014) and this protective effect seems to be mediated via the maintenance of intracellular pH (Perez et al., 2015). The same role in the maintenance of pH homoeostasis in acidic environment has been also described in E. durans (Linares et al., 2009) and E. faecium (Marcobal et al., 2006).

Time‐course of tyrDC gene expression

Table 4 reports the tyrDC gene expression data obtained for E. mundtii C46 and C53 by RT‐qPCR during 72 h growth in BHI supplemented or not with tyrosine. The tyrDC gene expression data previously obtained for E. faecalis EF37 by Bargossi et al. (2015b) are also reported as a reference.

Table 4.

Tyrosine decarboxylase (tyrDC) gene expression data for E. mundtii C46 and C53 grown in BHI added or not with 0.1% tyrosine during 72 h, as determined by RT‐qPCR. The tyrDC gene expression data for E. faecalis EF37 is also reported (adapted from Bargossi et al., 2015b). The standard deviation is reported within parentheses

Strain Cultural medium Log (copies/μg cDNA) at time (h)
2 3 4 5 8 24 48 72
C46 BHI 3.4 (± 0.06) 3.0 (± 0.03) 2.5 (± 0.03) 2.7 (± 0.30) 3.1 (± 0.004) 2.9 (± 0.14) 3.0 (± 0.13) 2.3 (± 0.83)
BHI + tyra 2.9 (± 0.002) 3.5 (± 0.06) 4.6 (± 0.05) 4.1 (± 0.13) 2.5 (± 0.03) 3.1 (± 0.11) 1.6 (± 0.04) 1.6 (± 0.13)
C53 BHI 2.7 (± 0.31) 3.0 (± 0.39) 3.3 (± 0.07) 2.3 (± 0.22) 2.6 (± 0.07) 2.1 (± 0.03) 2.0 (± 0.03) 1.3 (± 0.27)
BHI + tyra 2.2 (± 0.22) 3.0 (± 0.09) 4.2 (± 0.21) 3.7 (± 0.19) 2.2 (± 0.03) 2.0 (± 0.04) 1.4 (± 0.14) 1.1 (± 0.14)
EF37 BHI 5.08 (± 0.02) n.d.b 4.87 (± 0.01) n.d. 5.22 (± 0.05) 2.42 (± 0.07) 2.81 (± 0.03) 1.01 (± 0.29)
BHI + tyra 4.79 (± 0.06) n.d. 6.11 (± 0.02) n.d. 5.03 (± 0.05) 4.15 (± 0.05) 3.38 (± 0.03) 4.10 (± 0.12)
a

BHI broth plus 1 g l−1 tyrosine.

b

n.d., not determined.

In general, the tyrDC gene expression time‐course did not differ considerably between the two E. mundtii strains, even if the values found for the strain C53 were averagely lower. These data are in compliance with the phenotypic behaviour of the two analysed E. mundtii strains, as they showed similar trends in the accumulation of tyramine and phenylethylamine, and produced comparable final levels of these BAs in the different tested conditions.

In the medium without tyrosine, a high value of transcript (about 3 log copies/μg cDNA) was already observed after 2 h (early exponential phase), probably due to the strong residual effect of the precursor present in the pre‐cultivation medium. The amount of tyrDC transcript remained rather stable throughout all the period monitored. The addition of the precursor affected considerably the tyrDC expression level depending on the growth phase. Indeed, the expression of tyrDC increased rapidly, peaked (> 4 log copies/μg cDNA) at 4 h during the exponential phase of growth, when the highest number of cells for ml was reached. After 8 h, the gene expression decreased progressively until the end of the 72‐h period monitored.

As notice above, the E. mundtii strains were able to accumulate greater amounts of BAs than that of other previously studied enterococcal strains E. faecalis EF37 and E. faecium FC12 under the same conditions (Bargossi et al., 2015b). However, the maximum tyrDC gene copies number of E. mundtii C46 and C53, obtained after 4 h growth in BHI with tyrosine, did not reach the value found for E. faecalis EF37 (6.1 log copies/μg cDNA) in the same conditions. The expression trend of the E. mundtii strains in BHI without tyrosine was more similar to that of E. faecium FC12 which presented a rather constant tyrDC transcript level during the entire incubation period. However, in BHI added with tyrosine, the expression profile differed between the E. mundtii strains and E. faecium FC12 because the tyrDC gene transcript reached the maximum level in the exponential (4 h) and in the stationary phase (24 h), respectively, when the highest cell number of 9 log CFU ml−1 was detected for all these strains.

Analysis of the TDC operon region

The characteristics of the TDC operon region involved in tyramine production have been described in several tyraminogenic bacterial strains, including enterococci (Connil et al., 2002; Lucas et al., 2003; Coton et al., 2004; Fernández et al., 2004; Marcobal et al., 2012; Bargossi et al., 2015a). However, the molecular knowledge of this region for E. mundtii is extremely scarce. Therefore, an investigation was carried out to determine the DNA and amino acid sequences of the E. mundtii C46 tyramine production‐associated genes and the genetic organization of the TDC operon region, considering also the available genome sequencing data. In particular, the region downstream the gene tyrS including the genes tyrDC and tyrP, which encode for the tyrosine decarboxylase and the tyrosine/tyramine permease, respectively, was amplified and sequenced. Indeed, the gene Na+/H+ antiporter (nhaC), that usually follow tyrP in the TDC operon of several tyramine‐producing LAB, such as E. faecalis, E. faecium and L. brevis (Marcobal et al., 2012; Bargossi et al., 2015a) was not recognized by PCR performed with the primers covering the intergenic region between tyrP and nhaC. Such gene organization was found also in the fully sequenced and assembled genome of E. mundtii QU 25 (Shiwa et al., 2014) (GCA_000504125.1) that shows a lacI family transcriptional regulator gene downstream tyrP (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Organization of the TDC operon in the strain E. mundtii QU 25 (GCA_000504125.1); (B) genome fragment encoding for an additional PLP‐dependent decarboxylase, an APC family amino acid transporter and a cation transporter E1‐E2 family ATPase; upstream is recognized as a M protein trans‐acting positive regulator and downstream as an ISEfa11 (ISL3 family) transposase, followed by an additional M trans‐acting positive regulator gene.

BLASTN analysis of the 3677 bp nucleotide sequence of the E. mundtii C46 TDC operon region showed the best overall identity of 99% (3673/3677 nt) with that of E. mundtii QU 25. High levels of DNA sequence identity (> 80%) were also found for several strains belonging to other enterococcal species: E. hirae ATCC 9790 (1884/2282, 83%), E. durans KLDS 6.0930 and KLDS 6.0933 (1876/2285, 82%), and E. faecium Aus0085, NRRL B‐2354, Aus0004, DO, and T110 (1877/2286, 82%). On the contrary, lower sequence identity (76%) was achieved for strains belonging to the species E. faecalis (e.g. ATCC 29212 and V583). Putative promoter and terminator were found upstream the start codon of the genes tyrDC (Fig. 3A), but not in the short intergenic sequence before the gene tyrP, suggesting that these two genes are probably co‐transcribed, as already showed for other species, such as E. faecalis and L. brevis (Marcobal et al., 2012).

Surprisingly, BLASTN analysis discovered in the genome of E. mundtii QU 25 (Shiwa et al., 2014), the presence of another region constituted by two genes similar to tyrDC and tyrP. These genes showed lower sequence identity values, 69% and 64%, respectively, with those present in the TDC operon. The genetic organization of the genomic segment that includes these two genes is shown in Fig. 3B. This additional portion was also recovered in the genome of other enterococcal strains, such as E. hirae ATCC 9790, E. faecium NRRL B‐2354, E. durans KLDS6.0930 and KLDS6.0930. However, in these strains a further putative amino acid permease was annotated between the tyrosine permease and the cation transporter E1‐E2 family ATPase. The presence of a gene associated to a transposase after the ATPase encoding gene in E. mundtii QU 25 (Shiwa et al., 2014) is of particular interest, as it could be involved in spontaneous events of gene duplication or horizontal transfer.

BLASTX analysis and comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of E. mundtii C46 TDC operon region were also carried out. The translated nucleotide sequence generated two proteins in the frame +1 and +2 respectively. The first one showed the highest identity with a tyrosine decarboxylase (BAO05941.1) of E. mundtii QU 25 (624/624 nt, 100%) and E. mundtii CRL35 (616/624 nt, 99%) and decreasing identity (90% to 71%) with decarboxylases from other species of the genus Enterococcus. On the contrary, lower similarity (61% to 9%) was found with the additional PLP‐dependent decarboxylase detected with BLASTN analysis. The second protein presented a putative conserved domain associated to a putative glutamate/gamma‐aminobutyrate antiporter (TIGR03813). This sequence showed 100% identity with the amino acid permease family protein of E. mundtii QU 25 and E. mundtii ATCC 883, and decreasing identity with the amino acid permeases of other species of the genus Enterococcus. Also in this case, lower identity (58–60%) was found with the additional amino acid permease detected with BLASTN analysis.

These sequence analysis results taken together indicated the presence in the E. mundtii genome of a TDC operon with a classical genetic organization (i.e. tyrS, tyrDC and tyrP) and provided evidences for a new additional copy consisting of three ORF. According to Lynch and Conery (2000), duplications of a genome segments have been thought to be a primary source of material for the origin of evolutionary novelties, including new gene functions and expression patterns. Therefore, the additional copy may acquire a novel, beneficial function and become preserved by natural selection, with the other copy retaining the original function. Recently, Bargossi et al. (2015a) described the compromised tyrosine decarboxylase activity of the strain E. faecium FC643 due to a codon stop in the translated tyrDC sequence. However, this strain showed a slow and reduced production of tyramine, and not 2‐phenylethylamine, probably due to the presence of the additional enzyme with different substrate specificity and regulation mechanism respect to the decarboxylase encoded by the gene tyrDC of the TDC operon.

As regards E. mundtii, it can be supposed that all the genes in the two operon regions detected are expressed and produce functional products. As BLAST analysis revealed that the primer pairs DEC5/DEC3 and TYR3f/TYR4r used in this study were able to match conserved regions on both the putative tyrDC genes present in the E. mundtii QU25 genome, new target‐specific primers have to be designed to detect and analyse the contribute of the additional genes to the overall tyraminogenic potential of E. mundtii. Therefore, the role of the additional genes and proteins in the context of BA production needs further deep investigation.

Conclusions

In this study, the capability of E. mundtii strains to accumulate tyrosine and 2‐phenylalanine in cultural media was assessed, and more information on the genetic basis of their tyraminogenic potential were obtained for the first time. The two strains considered here produced greater amounts of tyramine than those accumulated by other strains belonging to E. faecium and E. faecalis previously studied in the same conditions (Bargossi et al., 2015b). By contrast, their ability to decarboxylate phenylalanine was less enhanced if compared with the same strains. Likewise the other enterococcal strains, the expression analysis of the gene tyrDC showed that an excess of the precursor tyrosine affected the amount of the transcript during the exponential phase of growth, and that the amino acids fraction present in the medium also modulated the level of the transcript. The genetic organization as well as sequence identity levels of the genes tyrDC and tyrP indicated that the tyramine‐forming pathway in E. mundtii is similar to those in phylogenetically closer enterococcal species, such as E. faecium, E. hirae and E. durans; however, the gene Na+/H+ antiporter (nhaC) that usually follow tyrP is missing. Analysis of the available data on genome content and organization of E. mundtii QU 25 (Shiwa et al., 2014) and other Enterococcus strains revealed an unexpectedly presence of another region that includes two genes encoding for an additional PLP‐dependent decarboxylase and an amino acid permease. It is tempting to speculate that a duplication event occurred and the evolution of this redundant copy induced the acquisition of different specificity leading to the maintenance of both the functional copies. Thus, this discovery uncovers another level of complexity in the enterococcal BAs regulatory network. Further studies have to be performed to better explain the genetic and functional characteristics of these further enzymes and their correlation with tyrosine decarboxylating potential of enterococci. Moreover, regulation of decarboxylases and permeases at protein level has to be evaluated to verify if post‐translational mechanisms could affect and modulate enzymatic activities.

Experimental procedures

Characterization of the strains and screening procedure for tyramine production

In the present study, we used 35 cocci LAB isolates (Fig. 1), deposited in the bacterial culture collection of the Biotechnology Department of the Verona University. They were previously isolated from different fresh and ensiled forage crops (namely lucerne, ryegrass, maize), maize grain silage and starter cultures for silages, as shown in Fig. 1.

All isolates were maintained as culture stocks in 20% (w/v) glycerol at −80°C and grown aerobically in BHI Broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) at 37°C for 24 h, unless indicated otherwise.

The isolates were tested for morphological characteristics, Gram test, catalase test, growth in the presence of 6.5% NaCl, growth at 15 and 45°C and at pH 4.4 and 9.6, as well as for their homo or heterolactic fermentation.

The tyrosine decarboxylase activity of the isolates was evaluated using the screening plate method described by Bover‐Cid and Holzapfel (1999).

TyrDC gene detection

Genomic DNA of tyramine‐positive isolates was obtained from 1 ml of overnight culture by using the Wizard Genomic DNA purification system (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. Isolates were assayed for the presence of the gene tyrDC by PCR analysis with the primers DEC5 and DEC3 (Table 1), following the conditions described previously (Torriani et al., 2008). PCR product was visualized on a 2% agarose gel.

Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis and identification of tyramine‐positive cocci

In order to genetically typify the 35 tyramine‐positive coccal strains, a preliminary RAPD‐PCR analysis was performed with the primer 1254 (Table 1). Conversion, normalization and numerical analysis of the patterns were performed by gelcompar 4.0 software (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium). A dendrogram was produced and major clusters with a cut‐off point of about 60% in the UMPGA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Averages) clustering analysis similarity level was taken as representing a single cluster. Species identification was carried out by phenylalanyl‐tRNA synthase α‐subunit (pheS) gene sequence analysis (Naser et al., 2005). The pheS partial gene amplification was obtained with the primers pheS‐21‐F and pheS‐22‐R (Table 1). PCR conditions were set according to Naser et al. (2005) with exception that annealing temperature was 50°C. The expected amplicon (455 bp) was purified with the Wizard SV gel and PCR clean‐up system (Promega Corporation) and cloned with the cloning kit pGEMT‐easy vector system (Promega Corporation). Recombinant plasmids were sequenced at the GATC Biotech Ltd (Koln, Germany). Data were analysed with the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) provided by National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).

Growth parameters of two Enterococcus mundtii strains and tyramine production

Two strains (C46 and C53), isolated from grass silage and identified as Enterococcus mundtii, were used for deeper investigations. The two considered enterococci were pre‐cultivated for 24 h at 37°C in BHI broth added with 1000 mg l−1 of tyrosine (Sigma‐Aldrich, Gallarate, Italy). After 24 h of pre‐cultivation, the microorganisms were inoculated, at a concentration of approximately 7 log CFU ml−1, in BHI broth, added or not with 1 g l−1 of tyrosine and incubated at 37°C for 72 h. The evaluation of the strain growth in BHI was performed by measuring the OD600 with a UV‐VIS spectrophotometer (Cary 60 UV‐Vis; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with plastic cuvettes (1.5 ml) at defined times (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h). The OD600 data were fitted with the Gompertz equation as modified by Zwietering et al. (1990).

y=k+AeeμmaxEA(λt)+1

where y is the OD600 at time t, A represent the maximum OD600 value reached, μmax is the maximum OD600 increase rate in exponential phase and λ is the lag time.

The maximum cell concentration reached was determined at the beginning of the stationary phase by plate counting enterococci onto BHI agar.

The BAs were determined after 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of incubation. The cultures were centrifuged at 10 000 rpm for 10 min at 10°C, and the supernatants were used for BAs determination by HPLC after derivatization with dansyl‐chloride (Sigma‐Aldrich, Gallarate, Italy) according to Bargossi et al. (2015b). The quantification was performed according to Tabanelli et al. (2012) and the amount of tyramine and 2‐phenylethylamine was expressed as mg ml−1 by reference to a calibration curve obtained with standard solutions. The trials were always analysed in triplicate.

RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and RT‐qPCR assay

Two millilitre aliquots of E. mundtii cultures were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min and total RNA was isolated from the collected cell pellets according to Bargossi et al. (2015b). Total cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of RNA using the ImProm‐IITM Reverse Transcriptase kit (Promega Corporation), following the manufacturer's recommendations.

The expression level of the gene tyrDC was analysed by a reverse transcription‐quantitative real time PCR (RT‐qPCR) assay with the primers TYR3f and TYR4r (Table 1); thermo cycler, reaction mixture and amplification programme were previously described in Torriani et al. (2008), as well as the procedure of the absolute quantification of the tyrDC copies number. Two independent biological replicates were performed for each trial and data were obtained from two technical replicates per sample.

Analysis of the TDC operon region

The TDC operon fragments were obtained for E. mundtii C46 and C53 by PCR amplification with the partially degenerate primers reported in Table 1. PCR mixture was composed of 1× PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 nM dNTPs, 0.5 μM each primer and 50 ng DNA. Amplification programme comprised: 95°C for 5 min, 35 cycles at 94°C, 30 s; 56°C, 45 s; 72°C, 1 min and final extension at 72°C, 10 min. Amplicons were purified, cloned and sequenced as reported above. The partial TDC operon sequences of the strains E. mundtii C46 and C53 were submitted to the GenBank nucleotide database under the accession numbers KU870523 and KU870522 respectively.

Promoters prediction was carried out by BPROM, a bacterial sigma70 promoter recognition program (http://linux1.softberry.com/berry.phtml?topic=bprom%26group=programs%26subgroup=gfindb; Solovyev and Salamov, 2011). Putative Rho‐independent transcription terminators were predicted by the Arnold Finding Terminators (http://rna.igmors.u-psud.fr/toolbox/arnold/index.php).

Similar searches were performed with the BLAST programs available at the NCBI. Sequence alignments were carried out with the Clustal Omega analysis Tool Web Services from the EMBL‐EBI (Sievers et al., 2011).

Statistical analysis

The growth model was fitted using the statistical package Statistica for Windows 6.1 (Statsoft Italia, Vigonza, Italy).

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Microbial Biotechnology (2016) 9(6), 801–813

Funding Information

No funding information provided.

References

  1. Akopyanz, N. , Bukanov, N.O. , Westblom, T.U. , Kresovich, S. , and Berg, D.E. (1992) DNA diversity among clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori detected by PCR‐based RAPD fingerprinting. Nucleic Acid Res 20: 5137–5142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aymerich, T. , Martín, B. , Garriga, M. , Vidal‐Carou, M.C. , Bover‐Cid, S. , and Hugas, M. (2006) Safety properties and molecular strain typing of lactic acid bacteria from slightly fermented sausages. J Appl Microbiol 100: 40–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bargossi, E. , Gardini, F. , Gatto, V. , Montanari, C. , Torriani, S. , and Tabanelli, G. (2015a) The capability of tyramine production and correlation between phenotypic and genetic characteristics of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis strains. Front Microbiol 6: 1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bargossi, E. , Tabanelli, G. , Montanari, C. , Lanciotti, R. , Gatto, V. , Gardini, F. , and Torriani, S. (2015b) Tyrosine decarboxylase activity of enterococci grown in media with different nutritional potential: tyramine and 2‐phenylethylamine accumulation and tyrDC gene expression. Front Microbiol 6: 259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beshkova, D. , and Frengova, G. (2012) Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria: microorganisms of potential biotechnological importance for the dairy industry. Engineer Life Sci 12: 419–432. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bigwood, T. , Hudson, J.A. , Cooney, J. , McIntyre, L. , Billington, C. , Heinemann, J.A. , and Wall, F. (2012) Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes by Enterococcus mundtii isolated from soil. Food Microbiol 32: 354–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonetta, S. , Bonetta, S. , Carraro, E. , Coïsson, J.D. , Travaglia, F. , and Arlorio, M. (2008) Detection of biogenic amine producer bacteria in a typical Italian goat cheese. J Food Prot 71: 205–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bover‐Cid, S. , and Holzapfel, W.H. (1999) Improved screening procedure for biogenic amine production by lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 53: 33–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Collins, M.D. , Farrow, J.A.E. , and Jones, D. (1986) Enterococcus mundtii sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 36: 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  10. Connil, N. , Le Breton, Y. , Dousset, X. , Auffray, Y. , Rincé, A. , and Prévost, H. (2002) Identification of the Enterococcus faecalis tyrosine decarboxylase operon involved in tyramine production. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 3537–3544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Corsetti, A. , Settanni, L. , Chaves López, C. , Felis, G.E. , Mastrangelo, M. , and Suzzi, G. (2007) A taxonomic survey of lactic acid bacteria isolated from wheat (Triticum durum) kernels and non‐conventional flours. Syst Appl Microbiol 30: 561–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Coton, M. , Coton, E. , Lucas, P. , and Lonvaud‐Funel, A. (2004) Identification of the gene encoding a putative tyrosine decarboxylase of Carnobacterium divergens 508. Development of molecular tools for the detection of tyramine‐producing bacteria. Food Microbiol 21: 125–130. [Google Scholar]
  13. De Kwaadsteniet, M. , Todorov, S.D. , Knoetze, H. , and Dicks, L.M.T. (2005) Characterization of a 3944 Da bacteriocin, produced by Enterococcus mundtii ST15, with activity against Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 105: 433–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Espeche, M.C. , Juárez Tomás, M.S. , Wiese, B. , Bru, E. , and Nader‐Macías, F.M.E. (2014) Physicochemical factors differentially affect the biomass and bacteriocin production by bovine Enterococcus mundtii CRL1656. J Dairy Sci 97: 789–797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Feng, G. , Guron, G.K.P. , Churey, J.J. , and Worobo, R.W. (2009) Characterization of Mundticin L, a class IIa anti‐listeria bacteriocin from Enterococcus mundtii CUGF08. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 5708–5713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fernández, M. , and Zúñiga, M. (2006) Amino acid catabolic pathways of lactic acid bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol 32: 155–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fernández, M. , Linares, D.M. , and Alvarez, M.A. (2004) Sequencing of the tyrosine decarboxylase cluster of Lactococcus lactis IPLA 655 and the development of a PCR method for detecting tyrosine decarboxylating lactic acid bacteria. J Food Prot 67: 2521–2529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fernández, M. , Linares, D.M. , Rodríguez, A. , and Alvarez, M.A. (2007) Factors affecting tyramine production in Enterococcus durans IPLA 655. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73: 1400–1406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fontana, C. , Cocconcelli, P.S. , Vignolo, G. , and Saavedra, L. (2015) Occurrence of antilisterial structural bacteriocins genes in meat borne lactic acid bacteria. Food Control 47: 53–59. [Google Scholar]
  20. Foulquié Moreno, M.R. , Sarantinopoulos, P. , Tsakalidou, E. , and De Vuyst, L. (2006) The role and application of enterococci in food and health. Int J Food Microbiol 106: 1–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Franz, C.M.A.P. , Holzapfel, W.H. , and Stiles, M.E. (1999) Enterococci at the crossroads of food safety? Int J Food Microbiol 47: 1–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Franz, C.M.A.P. , Stiles, M.E. , Schleifer, H.K. , and Holzapfel, W. (2003) Enterococci in food‐a conundrum for food safety. Int J Food Microbiol 88: 105–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Franz, C.M.A.P. , Huch, M. , Abriouel, H. , Holzapfel, W. , and Gálvez, A. (2011) Enterococci as probiotics and their implications in food safety. Int J Food Microbiol 151: 125–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Furtula, V. , Jackson, C.R. , Farrell, E.G. , Barrett, J.B. , Hiott, L.M. , and Chambers, P.A. (2013) antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. isolated from environmental samples in an area of intensive poultry production. Int J Environ Res Public Health 10: 1020–1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gardini, F. , Bover‐Cid, S. , Tofalo, R. , Belletti, N. , Gatto, V. , Suzzi, G. , and Torriani, S. (2008) Modeling the aminogenic potential of Enterococcus faecalis EF37 in dry fermented sausages through chemical and molecular approaches. Appl Environ Microb 74: 2740–2750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Giraffa, G. (2002) Enterococci from foods. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26: 163–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Giraffa, G. (2003) Functionality of enterococci in dairy products. Int J Food Microbiol 88: 215–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Graves, A.K. , and Weaver, R.W. (2010) Characterization of enterococci populations collected from a subsurface flow constructed wetland. J Appl Microbiol 108: 1226–1234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Higashide, T. , Takahashi, M. , Kobayashi, A. , Ohkubo, S. , Sakurai, M. , Shirao, Y. , et al (2005) Endophthalmitis caused by Enterococcus mundtii . J Clin Microbiol 43: 1475–1476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hollenbeck, B.L. , and Rice, L.B. (2012) Intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms in enterococcus. Virulence 3: 421–433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kalhotka, L. , Manga, I. , Přichystalová, J. , Hůlová, M. , Vyletělová, M. , and Šustová, K. (2012) Decarboxylase activity test of the genus Enterococcus isolated from goat milk and cheese. Acta Vet Brno 81: 145–151. [Google Scholar]
  32. Klein, G. (2003) Taxonomy, ecology and antibiotic resistance of enterococci from food and the gastro‐intestinal tract. Int J Food Microbiol 88: 123–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Komprda, T. , Burdychová, R. , Dohnal, V. , Cwiková, O. , and Sládková, P. (2008) Some factors influencing biogenic amines and polyamines content in Dutch‐type semi‐hard cheese. Eur Food Res Technol 227: 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ladero, V. , Fernández, M. , Calles‐Enríquez, M. , Sánchez‐Llana, E. , Cañedo, E. , Martin, M.C. , and Alvarez, M.A. (2012) Is the production of the biogenic amines tyramine and putrescine a species‐level trait in enterococci? Food Microbiol 30: 132–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Leclerc, H. , Devriese, L.A. , and Mossel, D.A.A. (1996) Taxonomical changes in intestinal (faecal) enterococci and streptococci: consequences on their use as indicators of faecal contamination in drinking water. J Appl Bacteriol 81: 459–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Leuschner, R.G.K. , Kurihara, R. , and Hammes, W.P. (1999) Formation of biogenic amines by proteolytic enterococci during ripening. J Sci Food Agric 79: 1141–1144. [Google Scholar]
  37. Linares, D.M. , Fernández, M. , Martín, M.C. , and Alvarez, M.A. (2009) Tyramine biosynthesis in Enterococcus durans is trascriptionally regulated by the extracellular pH and tyrosine concentration. Microb Biotechnol 2: 625–633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Linares, D.M. , Martín, M.C. , Ladero, V. , Alvarez, M.A. , and Fernández, M. (2011) Biogenic amines in dairy products. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 51: 691–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Linares, D.M. , del Rio, B. , Bedruello, B. , Ladero, V. , Cruz, M. , de Jong, A. , et al (2015) AguR, a transmembrane transcription activator of the putrescine biosynthesis operon in Lactococcus lactis, acts in response to the agmatine concentration. Appl Environ Microbiol 81: 6145–6157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, F. , Du, L. , Xu, W. , Wang, D. , Zhang, M. , Zhu, Y. , and Xu, W. (2013) Production of tyramine by Enterococcus faecalis strains in water‐boiled salted duck. J Food Prot 76: 854–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lucas, P. , Landete, J. , Coton, M. , Coton, E. , and Lonvaud‐Funel, A. (2003) The tyrosine decarboxylase operon of Lactobacillus brevis IOEB 9809: characterization and conservation in tyramine‐producing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 229: 65–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lund, P. , Tramonti, A. , and De Biase, D. (2014) Coping with low pH: molecular strategies in neutralophilic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38: 1–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lynch, M. , and Conery, J.S. (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290: 1151–1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Marcobal, A. , De Las Rivas, B. , and Muñoz, R. (2006) First genetic characterization of a bacterial ‐phenylethylamine biosynthetic enzyme in Enterococcus faecium RM58. FEMS Microbiol Lett 258: 144–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Marcobal, A. , De Las Rivas, B. , Landete, J.M. , Tabera, L. , and Muñoz, R. (2012) Tyramine and phenylethylamine biosynthesis by food bacteria. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutrit 52: 448–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. McCabe‐Sellers, B. , Staggs, C.G. , and Bogle, M.L. (2006) Tyramine in foods and monoamine oxidase inhibitor drugs: a crossroad where medicine, nutrition, pharmacy, and food industry converge. J Food Comp Anal 19: S58–S65. [Google Scholar]
  47. Molenaar, D. , Bosscher, J.S. , ten Brink, B. , Driessen, A.J. , and Konings, W.N. (1993) Generation of a proton motive force by histidine decarboxylation and electrogenic histidine/histamine antiport in Lactobacillus buchneri . J Bacteriol 175: 2864–2870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Moore, D.F. , Guzman, J.A. , and McGee, C. (2008) Species distribution and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from surface and ocean water. J Appl Microbiol 105: 1017–1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Muller, T. , Ulrich, A. , Ott, E.M. , and Muller, M. (2001) Identification of plant‐associated enterococci. J Appl Microbiol 91: 268–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Naser, S.M. , Thompson, F.L. , Hoste, B. , Gevers, D. , Dawyndt, P. , Vancanneyt, M. , and Swings, J. (2005) Application of multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) for rapid identification of Enterococcus species based on rpoA and pheS genes. Microbiol 151: 2141–2150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ni, K. , Wang, Y. , Li, D. , Cai, Y. , and Pang, H. (2015) Characterization, identification and application of lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage paddy rice silage. PLoS ONE 10: e0121967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Pereira, C.I. , Matos, D. , San Romaõ, M.V. , and Barreto Crespo, M.T. (2009) Dual role for the tyrosine decarboxylation pathway in Enterococcus faecium E17: response to an acid challenge. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 345–352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Perez, M. , Calles‐Enríquez, M. , Nes, I. , Martin, M.C. , Fernandez, M. , Ladero, V. , and Alvarez, M.A. (2015) Tyramine biosynthesis is transcriptionally induced at low pH and improves the fitness of Enterococcus faecalis in acidic environments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99: 3547–3558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pérez‐Martín, F. , Seseña, S. , Miguel Izquierdo, P. , and Palop, M.L. (2014) Are Enterococcus populations present during malolactic fermentation of red wine safe? Food Microbiol 42: 95–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Repizo, G.D. , Espariz, M. , Blancato, V.S. , Suárez, C.A. , Esteban, L. , and Magni, C. (2014) Genomic comparative analysis of the environmental Enterococcus mundtii against enterococcal representative species. BMC Genom 15: 489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Romano, A. , Ladero, V. , Alvarez, M.A. , and Lucas, P.M. (2014) Putrescine production via the ornithine decarboxylation pathway improves the acid stress survival of Lactobacillus brevis and is part of a horizontally transferred acid resistance locus. Int J Food Microbiol 175: 14–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rossi, F. , Rizzotti, L. , Felis, G.E. , and Torriani, S. (2014) Horizontal gene transfer among microorganisms in food: current knowledge and future perspective. Food Microbiol 42: 232–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Schöbitz, R. , González, C. , Villarreal, K. , Horzella, M. , Nahuelquín, Y. , and Fuentes, R. (2014) A biocontroller to eliminate Listeria monocytogenes from the food processing environment. Food Control 36: 217–223. [Google Scholar]
  59. Shalaby, A.R. (1994) Significance of biogenic amines to food safety and human health. Food Res Int 29: 675–690. [Google Scholar]
  60. Shiwa, Y. , Yanase, H. , Hirose, Y. , Satomi, S. , Araya‐Kojima, T. , Watanabe, S. , et al (2014) Complete genome sequence of Enterococcus mundtii QU 25, an efficient L‐(1)‐lactic acid‐producing bacterium. DNA Res 21: 369–377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sievers, F. , Wilm, A. , Dineen, D.G. , Gibson, T.J. , Karplus, K. , Li, W. , et al (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high‐quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7: 539. doi:10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Solovyev, V. , and Salamov, A. (2011) Automatic annotation of microbial genomes and metagenomic sequences In Metagenomics and its Applications in Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environmental Studies. Li R.W. (ed). New York: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 61–78. [Google Scholar]
  63. Suzzi, G. , and Gardini, F. (2003) Biogenic amines in dry fermented sausages: a review. Int J Food Microbiol 88: 41–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tabanelli, G. , Coloretti, F. , Chiavari, C. , Grazia, L. , Lanciotti, R. , and Gardini, F. (2012) Effects of starter cultures and fermentation climate on the properties of two types of typical Italian dry fermented sausages produced under industrial conditions. Food Control 26: 416–426. [Google Scholar]
  65. Todorov, S.D. , Wachsman, M.B. , Knoetze, H. , Meincken, M. , and Dicks, L.M.T. (2005) An antibacterial and antiviral peptide produced by Enterococcus mundtii ST4V isolated from soya beans. Int J Antimicrob Agents 25: 508–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Torriani, S. , Gatto, V. , Sembeni, S. , Tofalo, R. , Suzzi, G. , Belletti, N. , et al (2008) Rapid detection and quantification of tyrosine decarboxylase gene (tdc) and its expression in gram‐positive bacteria associated with fermented foods using PCR‐based methods. J Food Prot 71: 93–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Trivedi, K. , Borkovcová, I. , and Karpíšková, R. (2009) Tyramine production by enterococci from various foodstuffs: a threat to the consumers. Czech J Food Sci 27: S357–S360. [Google Scholar]
  68. Vancanneyt, M. , Lombardi, A. , Andrighetto, C. , Knijff, E. , Torriani, S. , Björkroth, K.J. , et al (2002) Intraspecies genomic groups in Enterococcus faecium and their correlation with origin and pathogenicity. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 1381–1391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Vera Pingitore, E. , Todorov, S.D. , Sesma, F. , and Franco, B.D. (2012) Application of bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus mundtii CRL35 and Enterococcus faecium ST88Ch in the control of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh Minas cheese. Food Microbiol 32: 38–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. von Wright, A. , and Axelsson, L. (2012) Lactic acid bacteria: an introduction In Lactic Acid Bacteria: Microbiological and Functional Aspects, 4th ed. Lahtinen S., Ouwehand A.C., Salminen S.,s and von Wright A. (eds). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, Tayor & Francis Group, pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  71. Zwietering, M.H. , Jongenburger, I. , Rombouts, F.M. , and van't Riet, K. (1990). Modelling of the bacterial growth curve. Appl Environ Microb 56: 1875–1881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbial Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES