Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug 22;64(10):2042–2050. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14290

Dyspnea in Community-Dwelling Older Persons: A Multifactorial Geriatric Health Condition

Brienne Miner 1, Mary E Tinetti 1,2, Peter H Van Ness 1, Ling Han 1,3, Linda Leo-Summers 1, Anne B Newman 4, Patty J Lee 1, Carlos A Vaz Fragoso 1,3
PMCID: PMC5073004  NIHMSID: NIHMS781395  PMID: 27549914

Abstract

Objectives

The evaluation of dyspnea in older persons is traditionally focused on cardiorespiratory diseases, rather than systematically evaluating the multiple impairments that often occur with advancing age and which may also contribute to dyspnea. Accordingly, we have evaluated the associations between a broad array of cardiorespiratory and non-cardiorespiratory impairments and dyspnea in older persons.

Design

Cross-sectional.

Setting

Cardiovascular Health Study.

Participants

4,413 community-dwelling persons; mean age was 72.6, 57.1% were female, 4.5% were African-American, 27.2% had less than a high school education, and 54.7% were ever-smokers.

Measurements

Dyspnea severity (American Thoracic Society grade ≥2 defined moderate-to-severe) and several impairments, including those established by: spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1-second [FEV1]), maximal inspiratory pressure (respiratory muscle strength), echocardiography, ankle-brachial index, blood pressure, whole-body muscle mass (bioelectrical impedance), single chair stand (lower extremity function), grip strength, serum hemoglobin and creatinine, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Mini Mental State Examination, medication use, and body mass index (BMI).

Results

In a multivariable logistic regression model, impairments having strong associations with moderate-to-severe dyspnea included: FEV1 <lower limit of normal (adjusted odds ratios [adjOR] [95% confidence interval]=2.88 [2.37, 3.49]); left ventricular ejection fraction <45% (adjOR=2.12 [1.43, 3.16]); unable to perform a single chair stand (adjOR=2.10 [1.61, 2.73]), depressive symptoms (CES-D≥16; adjOR=2.02 [1.26, 3.23]); and obesity (BMI≥30; adjOR=2.07 [1.67, 2.55]). Impairments having modest but still statistically significant associations with moderate-to-severe dyspnea included respiratory muscle weakness, diastolic cardiac dysfunction, grip weakness, anxiety symptoms, and use of cardiovascular and psychoactive medications (adjORs ranged from 1.31-1.71).

Conclusion

In community-dwelling older persons, several cardiorespiratory and non-cardiorespiratory impairments were significantly associated with moderate-to-severe dyspnea, akin to a multifactorial geriatric health condition.

Keywords: dyspnea, aging, lung diseases, cardiovascular disease, geriatric syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Dyspnea in older persons merits strong consideration as a key public health concern. Across twenty study populations of older persons, for example, the prevalence of dyspnea at a moderate-to-severe level ranged from 17% to 62%,1 with the highest rates in those aged ≥ 80.2 Dyspnea at a moderate-to-severe level occurs at low exertional workloads, corresponding to activities of daily living, and is associated with decreased functional status and quality of life, and increased health care costs, hospitalization, and mortality.1-6

The evaluation of dyspnea in older persons is traditionally focused on cardiorespiratory diseases,1,7 rather than systematically evaluating the multiple impairments that often occur with advancing age and which may also contribute to dyspnea.3,8 The need for a comprehensive approach is informed by studies in older persons showing that a spirometric impairment has a poor positive predictive value for dyspnea (and vice versa),9 and that cardiac dysfunction is an infrequent cause of dyspnea.10 Importantly, even in persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) do not fully explain the experience of dyspnea.11

Accordingly, we propose a comprehensive approach when evaluating dyspnea in older persons, based on mechanisms that are both clinically and physiologically plausible. In particular, since an exertional component is a prominent clinical feature, a conceptual exercise model should be considered, including respiratory, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal impairments.12 In addition, since the ventilatory response is a prominent physiological factor, consideration should be given to a conceptual ventilatory model that describes dyspnea as a patient-perceived breathing discomfort arising from an imbalance between ventilatory capacity and ventilatory demand.12-15 In the latter model, additional impairments are identified, including neuropsychologic, medication related, hematologic (hemoglobin), renal, and nutritional. The diagnostic criteria for establishing the noted impairments, including corresponding pathways that lead to dyspnea, are described in the Methods section.

In the current study, using data from the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), a large, population-based sample of community-dwelling older persons,16 we systematically evaluated the associations of a broad array of cardiorespiratory and non-cardiorespiratory impairments with dyspnea at a moderate-to-severe level.17,18 In addition, as a secondary aim, we calculated the predicted probability of moderate-to-severe dyspnea in which key impairments were added cumulatively in a clinically meanigful sequence. We hypothesized that several impairments would be associated with moderate-to-severe dyspnea and that their multiple occurrence would substantially increase the predicted probability of having moderate-to-severe dyspnea, consistent with a multifactorial geriatric health condition as previously described for falls, dizziness, and delirium.19-22

METHODS

Study Population

The CHS is a population-based study of persons aged ≥65, identified from a random sample of Medicare eligibility lists in four U.S. communities.16 Participants were community-dwelling, lacked mobility disability or severe cognitive impairment, and gave written informed consent. In the current study, the analytical sample included CHS participants who at baseline completed an American Thoracic Society (ATS) dyspnea questionnaire and at least two ATS-acceptable spirometric maneuvers (described below).17,23-25 The rationale for these inclusion criteria was based on the outcome of interest being dyspnea and the high likelihood of CHS participants having a spirometric impairment (high prevalence of ever-smokers and of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke).26 Hence, we evaluated the original CHS cohort that was recruited in 1989 and 1990 (N=5,201), of whom 4,413 participants met our inclusion criteria.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

Baseline characteristics included age, sex, race, education level, smoking status, and self-reported medical conditions. Exertional dyspnea was evaluated by the ATS questionnaire, graded in severity according to 5 questions that described everyday experiences — the more severe the dyspnea, the higher the ATS grade (range 0-5).17 Dyspnea was classified as moderate-to-severe based on an ATS grade of at least 2, defined by a Yes response to: “Do you have to walk slower than people of your age on the level because of breathlessness?” ATS dyspnea grades ≥2 are associated with adverse health outcomes and establish dyspnea as occurring at low exertional workloads.17,18 None and mild dyspnea were defined by ATS grades 0 and 1, based on the absence vs. presence of dyspnea when hurrying on the level or up a slight hill, respectively.17

Impairments

The cardiorespiratory and non-cardiorespiratory impairments of interest are described below, including corresponding dyspnea pathways12-15 and diagnostic criteria.

Respiratory

Respiratory impairments decrease the ventilatory capacity and may lead to dyspnea at low exertional workloads. In addition, dead space ventilation may be increased in respiratory conditions (e.g. COPD), further exacerbating dyspnea through an increased ventilatory demand.

Spirometry was performed using ATS protocols,23 and included the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1-second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC), as well as FEV1 and FVC alone. Reference equations from the Global Lung Initiative (GLI) were used to establish the spirometric lower limit of normal (LLN).27 Normal spirometry was then defined by both the FEV1/FVC and FVC ≥LLN, whereas spirometric impairment was defined as airflow-obstruction if FEV1/FVC<LLN (e.g. COPD or asthma) and as restrictive-pattern if FEV1/FVC≥LLN but FVC<LLN (e.g., interstitial lung disease, heart failure, respiratory muscle weakness, and osteoporotic thoracic kyphosis).25,27-29 The FEV1 alone was also evaluated because it strongly predicts the maximal attainable ventilation during exercise.12,14 A decreased FEV1 was established if Z-score values were <LLN.25,27-29

The maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) in cm H2O was measured through a mouthpiece connected to a pressure transducer. The highest value was recorded, if a second MIP of at least 90% of the highest value was obtained during three to five attempts.30,31 Based on reference equations from the CHS, a decreased MIP (<LLN) established respiratory muscle weakness.31

Cardiovascular

Cardiovascular impairments decrease the delivery and distribution of oxygen to the exercising muscle. This, in turn, reduces the aerobic capacity of the exercising muscle, leading to an exercise-induced lactic acidosis at low exertional workloads. The subsequent buffering of lactate by bicarbonate increases CO2 flux to the lung, thus increasing ventilatory demand and leading to dyspnea. In addition, a cardiovascular disease such as heart failure can decrease ventilatory capacity (e.g. spirometric restrictive-pattern), further exacerbating dyspnea.

Measures included the LVEF, diastolic dysfunction, peripheral artery disease (PAD), orthostasis, and hypertension. LVEF thresholds were as follows: normal (>55%) and decreased (45-54% and <45%).32 Diastolic dysfunction was defined by echocardiography, based on peak E to A velocity >1.5 (decreased compliance) or <0.7 (decreased relaxation).10,32 PAD was defined by an ankle-brachial index (ABI) <0.90.33 Orthostasis was defined by a decrease in systolic blood pressure ≥20 mmHg from supine to standing, or inability to complete a standing blood pressure measurement due to orthostatic symptoms.34 Hypertension was defined by a blood pressure ≥150/90 mmHg or antihypertensive use with a physician diagnosis of hypertension.35

Musculoskeletal

Musculoskeletal impairments decrease oxygen utilization at the level of the exercising muscle, thus reducing its aerobic capacity and leading to an exercise-induced lactic acidosis at low exertional workloads. As discussed earlier, an exercise-induced lactic acidosis can lead to dyspnea through an increase in ventilatory demand.

Measures included skeletal muscle index, grip strength, and single chair stand. Whole-body muscle mass was estimated using bioelectrical impedance analysis, normalized for height, and termed the skeletal muscle index (SMI).36 The SMI was reported as low if ≤8.50 kg/m2 in men, and if ≤5.75 kg/m2 in women.37 Grip strength was reported as the average of 3 sex- and BMI-adjusted dynamometer readings. A decreased grip strength, defined as falling in the lowest quintile for this measure, established grip weakness.38 The single chair stand required participants to stand up from a seated position without using their arms.3,16 Participants were classified as “able” if successful or “unable” if they either used their arms or were unable to stand.

Neuropsychological

Neuropsychological impairments may affect the experience of dyspnea by altering the perception of breathing discomfort or by leading to a sedentary state that adversely affects the aerobic capacity of the exercising muscle. Depressive and anxiety symptoms were evaluated by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).39 Depressive symptoms corresponded to a score of ≥16 on the CES-D,40 and anxiety corresponded to a Yes answer for the CES-D item “did you feel fearful?”41 Cognitive impairment was established by a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score <24.42

Medications

Impairments related to the use of medications may also affect the experience of dyspnea by altering the perception of breathing discomfort or through adverse effects on respiratory, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal function.43 Medications were classified as cardiovascular, if including a statin or antihypertensive, or classified as psychoactive, if including an antipsychotic, benzodiazepine, or antidepressant.

Hematologic

Anemia decreases arterial oxygen content and can thus lead to exertional dyspnea as a consequence of a reduction in the delivery of oxygen to the exercising muscle. Anemia may also exacerbate coexisting cardiorespiratory impairments. Anemia was established by age-appropriate cut-offs for persons aged ≥65,44 namely a serum hemoglobin (g/dL) below the following ranges: <13.2 for white men, <12.2 for white women, <12.7 for black men, and <11.5 for black women.

Renal

Impaired renal function may lead to dyspnea as a result of increased ventilatory demand from the bicarbonate buffering of an underlying metabolic acidosis. Chronic kidney disease may also exacerbate respiratory, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal impairments. Kidney disease was defined by a serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL.

Nutritional

Obesity and weight loss may lead to sarcopenia and, in turn, to dyspnea, including as a result of impairments of the muscles of ambulation and breathing.3,12-15,36 Obesity was established by a body mass index (BMI) ≥30kg/m2 and unintentional weight loss by ≥10 lbs in the prior year.38 There were no underweight participants in this cohort (none had a BMI <18.5).

Statistical Analysis

Demographic and clinical characteristics were first summarized as means and standard deviations, or counts and percentages. Next, using categorical variables, frequency distributions of cardiorespiratory and non-cardiorespiratory impairments were cross-tabulated with the dyspnea outcome, stratified as none or mild vs. moderate-to-severe.

Logistic regression models evaluated the associations between impairments (represented by binary indicator variables) and moderate-to-severe dyspnea (vs. none or mild dyspnea). In unadjusted analyses, separate logistic regression models were used for each impairment. In adjusted analyses, a multivariable logistic regression model was used, including all impairments and additionally adjusted for age, sex, race, education, and smoking status. In addition, to evaluate the impact of having multiple impairments, a logistic regression model was used to calculate the predicted probabilities of moderate-to-severe dyspnea. Results are reported for combinations of four key impairments proceeding from none to all four impairments being present in a clinically meaningful sequence. The selected impairments were FEV1<LLN, LVEF<45%, unable to perform a single chair stand (lower extremity impairment), and depressive symptoms, as these commonly coexist in patients with multimorbidity, especially when including an older age group and complex diseases such as COPD and heart failure.3,8,43

Baseline data for diastolic cardiac dysfunction, grip weakness and unintentional weight loss) had ≥5% missing, whereas other variables had <5% missing data. The pattern, nature, and mechanism of missing data were assessed for all variables and found to be plausibly missing at random. Multiple imputation was then used to account for missing data. Ten datasets were imputed, using fully conditional specification methods. Multiple imputation was performed using PROC MI (SAS 9.4), and PROC MIANALYZE (SAS 9.4).

SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc. 2011; Cary, NC) was used in the analyses. P values <0.05 were interpreted to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Table 1 summarizes baseline characteristics of the analytical sample. Mean age was 72.6, 57.1% were female, 4.5% were African-American, 27.2% had less than a high school education, and 54.7% were ever-smokers. The five most prevalent medical conditions included high blood pressure (35.0%), coronary artery disease (20.0%), diabetes mellitus (9.5%), COPD (9.3%), and cancer (15.2%); the number of medical conditions averaged 1.1 ± 1.1. Moderate-to-severe dyspnea was established in 17.5% of participants. Table 1 also summarizes characteristics of excluded participants, showing results similar to the analytical sample.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Characteristic Analytical Sample a Excluded Participants a
N b Mean ± SD
or n (%)
N b Mean ± SD
or n (%)
Age (years) 4413 72.6 ± 5.3 712 73.9 ± 6.7
Females 2518 (57.1) 390 (54.8%)
African-American 199 (4.5) 41 (5.8)
Education: < High School 4403 1199 (27.2) 708 220 (31.1)
Smoking status
Never 4411 2001 (45.4) 711 360 (50.6)
Former 1895 (43.0) 267 (37.6)
Current 515 (11.7) 84 (11.8)
Medical conditions c
High blood pressure 4371 1529 (35.0) 702 256 (36.5)
Coronary artery disease d 4156 831 (20.0) 653 133 (20.4)
Diabetes mellitus 4387 416 (9.5) 707 71 (10.0)
COPD e 4388 409 (9.3) 706 71 (10.1)
Asthma 4400 285 (6.5) 703 63 (9.0)
Heart failure 4250 118 (2.8) 677 21 (3.1)
Kidney disease 4385 111 (2.5) 705 22 (3.1)
Stroke 4382 93 (2.1) 705 15 (2.1)
Cancer (ever) 4406 670 (15.2) 710 99 (13.9)
Number of medical conditions 4413 1.1 ± 1.1 f 712 1.2 ± 1.1
Dyspnea
None or mild dyspnea g 4413 3640 (82.5) 686 552 (80.5)
Moderate-to-severe dyspnea h 773 (17.5) 134 (19.5)

Abbreviations: ATS (American Thoracic Society), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).

a

Of the 5,201 participants in the original cohort, 4,413 met inclusion criteria, including completion of the ATS Adult Questionnaire and at least two ATS acceptable spirometric maneuvers, both at the baseline visit (analytical sample, N=4,413). Of the remaining 788 participants, 76 did not grant permission for data analysis and 712 did not meet our inclusion criteria (excluded participants, N=712).

b

Varies by missing data.

c

Self-reported, physician-diagnosed.

d

Angina or myocardial infarction.

e

Chronic bronchitis or emphysema.

f

Median 1 (interquartile range: 0-2).

g

Grade 0 or 1 on the ATS Adult Questionnaire.

h

Grade ≥2 on the ATS Adult Questionnaire.

Table 2 reports the frequency of cardiorespiratory impairments, according to dyspnea severity and for the entire analytical sample. Relative to participants who had none or mild dyspnea, those with moderate-to-severe dyspnea had a 2-fold or greater prevalence of having a spirometric restrictive-pattern (5.0% vs. 10.9%), spirometric airflow-obstruction (15.7% vs. 30.7%), FEV1<LLN (17.0% vs. 41.8%), MIP<LLN (6.4% vs. 13.2%), and LVEF<45% (2.8% vs. 7.2%). Similarly, Table 3 reports the frequency of non-cardiorespiratory impairments. Relative to participants who had none or mild dyspnea, those with moderate-to-severe dyspnea had an approximate 2-fold or greater prevalence of unable to perform a single chair stand (6.6% vs. 19.1%), depressive symptoms (1.7% vs. 6.1%), use of psychoactive medications (11.3% vs. 21.2%), and unintentional weight loss (4.4% vs. 9.3%), respectively.

Table 2.

Frequency distributions of cardiorespiratory impairments, according to dyspnea severity and for the entire study sample

Impairments Dyspnea ALL
None or Mild a Moderate-to-Severe b
n/N (%) c
Spirometry d
Normal 2885/3640 (79.3) 452/773 (58.5) 3337/4413 (75.6)
Restrictive-pattern 183/3640 (5.0) 84/773 (10.9) 267/4413 (6.1)
Airflow-obstruction 572/3640 (15.7) 237/773 (30.7) 809/4413 (18.3)
FEV1 e
Normal:     ≥LLN 3022/3640 (83.0) 450/773 (58.2) 3472/4413 (78.7)
Decreased:    <LLN 618/3640 (17.0) 323/773 (41.8) 941/4413 (21.3)
MIP f
Normal:     ≥LLN 3295/3519 (93.6) 640/737 (86.8) 3935/4256 (92.5)
Decreased:    <LLN 224/3519 (6.4) 97/737 (13.2) 321/4256 (7.5)
LVEF
Normal:     ≥55% 3344/3615 (92.5) 642/761 (84.4) 3986/4376 (91.1)
Decreased:    45-54% 171/3615 (4.7) 64/761 (8.4) 235/4376 (5.4)
<45% 100/3615 (2.8) 55/761 (7.2) 155/4376 (3.5)
Diastolic cardiac function g
Normal 2706/3472 (77.9) 480/719 (66.8) 3186/4191 (76.0)
Impaired 766/3472 (22.1) 239/719 (33.2) 1005/4191 (24.0)
Peripheral artery disease h
No 3144/3539 (88.8) 603/739 (81.6) 3747/4278 (87.6)
Yes 395/3539 (11.2) 136/739 (18.4) 531/4278 (12.4)
Orthostasis i
No 3000/3603 (83.3) 606/765 (79.2) 3606/4368 (82.6)
Yes 603/3603 (16.7) 159/765 (20.8) 762/4368 (17.5)
Hypertension j
No 2070/3640 (56.9) 363/773 (47.0) 2433/4413 (55.1)
Yes 1570/3640 (43.1) 410/773 (53.0) 1980/4413 (44.9)

Abbreviations: ATS (American Thoracic Society), FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1-second), FVC (forced vital capacity), LLN (lower limit of normal), LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction), MIP (maximal inspiratory pressure).

a

Grade 0 or 1 on the ATS Adult Questionnaire.

b

Grade ≥2 on the ATS Adult Questionnaire.

c

N varies due to missing data.

d

Normal spirometry was defined by FEV1/FVC and FVC, both ≥LLN; airflow-obstruction by FEV1/FVC<LLN; and restrictive-pattern by FEV1/FVC≥LLN and FVC<LLN.

e

FEV1 was evaluated because it predicts the maximal attainable ventilation during exercise.

f

A decreased MIP <LLN defined respiratory muscle weakness.

g

Diastolic dysfunction defined by peak E/A velocity >1.5 (decreased compliance) or <0.7 (decreased relaxation).

h

Defined by an ankle-brachial index (ABI) <0.90. ABIs >1.4 were excluded from analysis (n=50) as these were likely due to underlying calcinosis.

i

Defined as a drop in systolic blood pressure ≥20mmHg from supine to standing position or inability to do a standing blood pressure due to orthostatic symptoms.

j

Defined as a blood pressure ≥150/90mmHg or use of antihypertensive medications with a physician’s diagnosis of hypertension.

Table 3.

Frequency distributions of non-cardiorespiratory impairments, according to dyspnea severity and for the entire study sample

Impairments Dyspnea ALL
None or Mild a Moderate-to-Severe b
n/N (%) c
Musculoskeletal
Low SMI d
No 3140/3584 (87.6) 662/763 (86.8) 3802/4347 (87.5)
Yes 444/3584 (12.4) 101/763 (13.2) 545/4347 (12.5)
Grip weakness e
No 2676/3405 (78.6) 459/699 (65.7) 3135/4104 (76.4)
Yes 729/3405 (21.4) 240/699 (34.3) 969/4104 (23.6)
Single chair stand f
Able 3361/3597 (93.4) 617/763 (80.9) 3978/4360 (91.2)
Unable 236/3597 (6.6) 146/763 (19.1) 382/4360 (8.8)
Neuropsychologic
Depressive symptoms g
No 3576/3636 (98.4) 725/772 (93.9) 4301/4408 (97.6)
Yes 60/3636 (1.7) 47/772 (6.1) 107/4408 (2.4)
Anxiety symptoms h
No 3153/3637 (86.7) 592/771 (76.8) 3745/4408 (85.0)
Yes 484/3637 (13.3) 179/771 (23.2) 663/4408 (15.0)
Cognitive impairment
MMSE ≥ 24 3474/3637 (95.5) 711/772 (92.1) 4185/4409 (94.9)
MMSE < 24 163/3637 (4.5) 61/772 (7.9) 224/4409 (5.1)
Medications
Cardiovascular i
No 2216/3640 (60.9) 328/773 (42.4) 2544/4413 (57.7)
Yes 1424/3640 (39.1) 445/773 (57.6) 1869/4413 (42.4)
Psychoactive j
No 3226/3638 (88.7) 609/773 (78.8) 3835/4411 (86.9)
Yes 412/3638 (11.3) 164/773 (21.2) 576/4411 (13.1)
Hematologic
Anemia k
No 3277/3615 (90.7) 671/764 (87.8) 3948/4379 (90.2)
Yes 338/3615 (9.4) 93/764 (12.2) 431/4379 (9.8)
Renal
Kidney disease l
No 3437/3623 (94.9) 699/765 (91.4) 4136/4388 (94.3)
Yes 186/3623 (5.1) 66/765 (8.6) 252/4388 (5.7)
Nutritional
BMI m
<30 3072/3636 (84.5) 547/771 (71.0) 3619/4407 (82.1)
≥30 564/3636 (15.5) 224/771 (29.1) 788/4407 (17.9)
Weight loss >10 lbs n
No 3284/3436 (95.6) 633/698 (90.7) 3917/4134 (94.8)
Yes 152/3436 (4.4) 65/698 (9.3) 217/4134 (5.3)

Abbreviations: ATS (American Thoracic Society), BMI (body mass index, kg/m2), CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), MMSE (Mini Mental State Examination), SMI (skeletal muscle index).

a

Grade 0 or 1 on the ATS Adult Questionnaire.

b

Grade ≥2 on the ATS Adult Questionnaire.

c

N varies due to missing data.

d

Low SMI was established by SMI ≤ 8.50 kg/m2 in men and ≤5.75 kg/m2 in women.

e

Weakness was defined by the lowest quintile of the average of 3 dynamometer readings (sex and BMI adjusted).

f

Participants were asked to stand up from a seated position in a chair without using their arms. Based on their performance, participants were classified as able to stand up without using arms or as unable to stand up without using arms (i.e., used their arms or unable to stand).

g

CES-D score of ≥16.

h

CES-D item of “did you feel fearful”: Yes vs. No.

i

Any statin or antihypertensive.

j

Any antipsychotic, benzodiazepine, or antidepressant.

k

Hemoglobin established anemia if below the following ranges: < 13.2 g/dL for white men aged ≥65, < 12.2 g/dL for white women aged ≥65, < 12.7 g/dL for black men aged ≥65, and < 11.5 g/dL for black women aged ≥65.

l

Creatinine < 1.5 mg/dl defined normal kidney function, whereas ≥1.5 defined kidney disease.

m

None had a BMI <18.5 kg/m2.

n

Unintentional weight loss in the prior year.

Table 4 reports odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for having moderate-to-severe dyspnea, based on the presence vs. absence of impairments. In the multivariable model, the strongest associations with moderate-to-severe dyspnea, namely having an adjusted OR (adjOR) ≥ 2.00, included the impairments of FEV1<LLN (adjOR=2.88 [2.37, 3.49]), LVEF<45% (adjOR=2.12 [1.43, 3.16]), unable to perform a single chair stand (adjOR=2.10 [1.61, 2.73]), depressive symptoms (adjOR=2.02 [1.26, 3.23]), and obesity (adjOR=2.07 [1.67, 2.55]). Impairments having more modest but still statistically significant associations with moderate-to-severe dyspnea (adjORs ranging from 1.31-1.71) included respiratory muscle weakness, LVEF 45%-54%, diastolic cardiac dysfunction, grip weakness, anxiety symptoms, and medication use.

Table 4.

Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) for having moderate-to-severe dyspnea, according to cardiorespiratory and non-cardiorespiratory impairments

Impairment a Moderate-to-severe dyspnea b
Unadjusted
OR (95% CI) c
Adjusted
OR (95% CI) d
Cardiorespiratory
Restrictive-pattern 2.65 (2.21, 3.17) See footnote e
Airflow-obstruction 2.94 (2.23, 3.87)
FEV1<LLN 3.51 (2.97, 4.15) 2.88 (2.37, 3.49)
Respiratory muscle weakness (MIP<LLN) 2.39 (1.86, 3.07) 1.60 (1.20, 2.14)
LVEF 45-54% 1.97 (1.46, 2.67) 1.71 (1.22, 2.40)
LVEF<45% 2.83 (2.02, 3.97) 2.12 (1.43, 3.16)
Diastolic dysfunction 1.79 (1.51, 2.12) 1.32 (1.08, 1.61)
Peripheral artery disease 1.79 (1.45, 2.21) 1.19, (0.93, 1.53)
Orthostasis 1.31 (1.08, 1.59) 1.18 (0.95, 1.47)
Hypertension 1.49 (1.27, 1.74) 0.91 (0.74, 1.11)
Non-cardiorespiratory
Low SMI 1.07 (0.85, 1.35) 0.95 (0.73, 1.25)
Grip weakness 1.99 (1.67, 2.36) 1.31 (1.06, 1.61)
Single chair stand 3.42 (2.74, 4.27) 2.10 (1.61, 2.73)
Depressive symptoms 3.89 (2.63, 5.74) 2.02 (1.26, 3.23)
Anxiety symptoms 1.97 (1.63, 2.39) 1.54 (1.22, 1.93)
Cognitive impairment 1.83 (1.35, 2.49) 1.00 (0.69, 1.45)
Cardiovascular medication 2.11 (1.80, 2.47) 1.65 (1.35, 2.01)
Psychoactive medication 2.11 (1.73, 2.58) 1.71 (1.35, 2.15)
Anemia 1.35 (1.06, 1.72) 1.03 (0.78, 1.38)
Kidney disease 1.75 (1.31, 2.34) 1.18 (0.82, 1.68)
Obesity 2.23 (1.86, 2.67) 2.07 (1.67, 2.55)
Unintentional weight loss 2.20 (1.63, 2.97) 1.31 (0.91, 1.87)

Abbreviations: ATS (American Thoracic Society), CI (confidence interval), FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1-second), LLN (lower limit of normal), LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction), OR (odds ratios), SMI (skeletal muscle index).

a

See footnotes to Tables 2 and 3, regarding diagnostic criteria for establishing the presence vs. absence of an impairment.

b

Grade ≥2 on ATS Adult Questionnaire.

c

From logistic regression models that evaluated separately each impairment.

d

From a multivariable logistic regression model that included all impairments and was additionally adjusted for age, sex, race, education, and smoking status.

e

Restrictive-pattern and airflow-obstruction were highly correlated with FEV1<LLN; the magnitude of the correlation was 0.66 and 0.68, respectively. Accordingly, because exertional dyspnea was the outcome of interest and because FEV1 is associated with the maximal attainable ventilation during exercise,12,14 FEV1<LLN was entered into the adjusted multivariable analysis, but not restrictive-pattern and airflow-obstruction.

To further inform the analyses in Table 4, the unadjusted odds ratios (unadjOR) with 95% CIs for having moderate-to-severe dyspnea are also reported for each covariate, using logistic regression models that evaluated separately each covariate and were unadjusted for other variables: age 71-80 (unadjOR=1.41 [1.19, 1.67]) and age >80 (unadjOR=1.88 [1.45, 2.44]), versus age 65-70; female sex (unadjOR=1.21 [1.03, 1.41]); African-American (unadjOR=1.29 [0.91, 1.82]); less than high school education (unadjOR=1.77 [1.50, 2.08]); and ever-smoker (unadjOR=1.23 [1.04, 1.45]) and current-smoker (unadjOR=1.49 [1.17, 1.90]), versus never-smoker.

Table 5 reports the predicted probabilities of moderate-to-severe dyspnea, according to four key cardiorespiratory and non-cardiorespiratory impairments. The results showed that the predicted probability of moderate-to-severe dyspnea increased from 0.50 to 0.92 when two non-cardiorespiratory impairments (unable to perform a single chair stand and depressive symptoms) were added to two cardiorespiratory impairments (FEV1<LLN and LVEF<45%).

Table 5.

Predicted probability of moderate-to-severe dyspnea, according to four key impairments a

Impairments Predicted Probabilityb
Moderate-to-Severe Dyspnea c
All four impairments absent 0.11
FEV1<LLN 0.29
+ LVEF<45% 0.50
+ Single chair stand (unable) 0.76
+ Depressive symptoms (CES-D ≥16) 0.92

Abbreviations: ATS (American Thoracic Society), CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1-second), LLN (lower limit of normal), LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction).

a

The four key impairments commonly coexist in patients with multimorbidity, especially in an older age group and complex diseases such as COPD and heart failure.3,8,43

b

From a logistic regression model with four key impairments reported in a clinically meaningful sequence, proceeding from none to all four impairments being present. The predicted probabilities represent the means of ten imputation samples (see Methods).

c

Grade ≥2 on ATS Adult Questionnaire.

DISCUSSION

Among 4,413 community-dwelling older persons, we found that a substantial proportion had cardiorespiratory and non-cardiorespiratory impairments, as well as moderate-to-severe dyspnea (ATS grade ≥2). We also found that cardiorespiratory impairments, including FEV1<LLN and LVEF<45%, were strongly associated with moderate-to-severe dyspnea, yielding adjORs >2.00. Similarly, non-cardiorespiratory impairments, including being unable to perform a single chair stand, depressive symptoms, and obesity were strongly associated with moderate-to-severe dyspnea, also yielding adjORs >2.00. Impairments having modest but still significant associations with moderate-to-severe dyspnea included respiratory muscle weakness, diastolic cardiac dysfunction, grip weakness, anxiety symptoms, and medication use, yielding adjORs ranging from 1.31-1.71.

Our results reaffirm the importance of cardiorespiratory impairments in the evaluation of dyspnea in older persons.1,7,12-15 In particular, cardiorespiratory impairments were strongly associated with moderate-to-severe dyspnea, a level of dyspnea that is likely to occur at low exertional workloads as during performance of activities of daily living.12-15,17,18 As described earlier, cardiorespiratory impairments can lead to dyspnea through adverse effects on exercise performance, including an imbalance between ventilatory capacity and ventilatory demand.12-15

Non-cardiorespiratory impairments are likewise important in the evaluation of moderate-to-severe dyspnea in older persons. For example, being unable to perform a single chair stand, a measure of impaired lower extremity function (especially proximal muscle function),3,45,46 had a magnitude of association with moderate-to-severe dyspnea (adjOR=2.10 [1.61, 2.73]) that was comparable with FEV1<LLN (adjOR=2.88 [2.37, 3.49]) and LVEF<45% (adjOR=2.12 [1.43, 3.16]). In addition, grip weakness, depressive and anxiety symptoms, obesity, and medication use were all significantly associated with moderate-to-severe dyspnea. As described earlier, these non-cardiorespiratory impairments can lead to dyspnea through adverse effects on exercise performance, including altering the perception of breathing discomfort and through an imbalance between ventilatory capacity and ventilatory demand.3,12-15,43

We also calculated the predicted probability of moderate-to-severe dyspnea by adding four key impairments in a clinically meaningful sequence (i.e., proceeding from none to all four impairments being present). The selected impairments are known to commonly coexist in patients with multimorbidity, especially when including an older age group and complex diseases such as COPD and heart failure.3,8,43 As shown in Table 5, the predicted probability of moderate-to-severe dyspnea increased from 0.50 to 0.92 when two non-cardiorespiratory impairments (unable to perform single chair stand and depressive symptoms) were added to two cardiorespiratory impairments (FEV1<LLN and LVEF<45%).

Hence, our results suggest that dyspnea in older persons represents a multifactorial geriatric health condition, defined by having multiple causes in multiple domains and occurring in a manner analogous to falls, dizziness, and delirium.19,20-22 The evaluation of dyspnea as a multifactorial geriatric health condition is clinically meaningful. Older persons experience multimorbidity and adverse effects related to polypharmacy,8,43,47 highlighting the importance of considering a broad array of impairments. Beyond those already discussed in the current study, other potential impairments could have been identified through an expanded medication review and gait assessment (including foot problems). In addition, environmental barriers (stairs and clutter at home) and coexisting symptoms such as fatigue and pain may have further modified the experience of dyspnea.43,48 Accordingly, future work should evaluate whether managing dyspnea as a multifactorial geriatric health condition improves outcomes, in a manner similar to that previously shown for falls and delirium.20,22

Importantly, the evaluation and management of dyspnea as a multifactorial geriatric health condition should additionally consider the experience of breathlessness as occurring in multiple dimensions, including sensory–perceptual (what breathing feels like), affective distress (how distressing breathing feels), and symptom impact or burden (functional status).15 These dimensions further define the appropriate diagnostic instrument for measuring dyspnea (Borg and visual analog scales, multi-item scales of emotional responses, multidimensional scales of quality of life/health status),15 as well as further define therapeutic endpoints (e.g. management of affective distress), including expanded use of non-pharmacologic [behavioral] interventions that are applicable across multiple diseases (and impairments).15,49 In the current study, for example, our use of the ATS dyspnea questionnaire largely measured symptom impact (activity limitation due to breathlessness) and, hence, our results are more specific to that dimension.

Unexpectedly, we found that skeletal muscle mass, as measured by the SMI, was not associated with moderate-to-severe dyspnea. Our evaluation of SMI considered alternative diagnostic thresholds, including tertiles and published36 sex-specific quartiles and disability-related thresholds — these were not associated with moderate-to-severe dyspnea (data not shown). Our results therefore suggest that impaired skeletal muscle function, as reflected by poor performance on the single chair stand, grip weakness, and respiratory muscle weakness, is the more relevant factor in the development of dyspnea, rather than skeletal muscle mass. Future work, however, should evaluate the association between SMI and measures of skeletal muscle function, as this approach will potentially identify diagnostic thresholds for SMI that are more likely to be significantly associated with dyspnea.

Consistent with prior work,33 the current study additionally found that, in the multivariable model, PAD was not associated significantly with dyspnea. Because it impairs walking endurance, we posit that PAD may limit exercise to workloads that are insufficient to increase ventilatory demand to levels that lead to dyspnea.33

The current study has several strengths, including a large sample of community-dwelling older persons and the concurrent assessment of a broad array of impairments that are clinically and physiologically meaningful to the experience of dyspnea. We acknowledge, however, several potential limitations. First, as the associations between impairments and dyspnea were cross-sectional, we cannot infer causality. Nonetheless, prior work has established that the selected impairments have a strong clinical and physiological basis as causal factors in the development of dyspnea.12-15 Second, the CHS respiratory evaluation was limited to spirometry, lacking assessments such as diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (a measure of gas exchange at the alveolar-capillary interface) and static lung volumes (a measure of impaired respiratory mechanics manifested as restriction, hyperinflation, and air trapping).29 In particular, this limited our capacity to assess pulmonary vascular disease and more comprehensive impairments in respiratory mechanics. However, because idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension has a low prevalence (15-50 cases per one million persons),50 and because abnormalities in diffusing capacity or static lung volumes are often due to cardiorespiratory diseases that also cause abnormalities in spirometry (COPD, interstitial lung disease, and heart failure),29 it is unlikely that a more extensive respiratory evaluation would have changed appreciably the results of the current study. Third, anxiety symptoms were evaluated based on a single item from the CES-D.39-41 Fourth, CHS had underrepresentation of persons aged >80 (mean age was 72.6) and no representation from Hispanics, thus limiting generalizability of our results for those particular populations. Lastly, the assembly of the CHS cohort in 1989-1990 may raise concerns regarding “timeliness” of data, but this is unlikely to be a major limitation as the same impairments remain relevant to the current generation of older persons.6,33,49

In conclusion, in a large sample of community-dwelling older persons, we found that several cardiorespiratory and non-cardiorespiratory impairments were strongly associated with moderate-to-severe dyspnea, akin to a multifactorial geriatric health condition. Because many of these impairments are modifiable, this approach could inform a comprehensive strategy designed to prevent or ameliorate a prevalent and clinically meaningful symptom in older persons.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We express our gratitude and acknowledge the important contributions of the participants and staff of the Cardiovascular Health Study.

Funding Source: The current study was conducted at the VA Clinical Epidemiology Research Center and the Yale Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (P30AG021342).

Funding Sources: The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) was supported by contracts HHSN268201200036C, HHSN268200800007C, N01 HC55222, N01HC85079, N01HC85080, N01HC85081, N01HC85082, N01HC85083, N01HC85086, and grant HL080295 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), with additional contribution from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Additional support was provided by R01AG023629 from the National Institute on Aging (NIA). A full list of principal CHS investigators and institutions can be found at CHS-NHLBI.org.

The current study was also supported by the CHS All Stars Study (NIA) AG023629; University of Pittsburgh Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center P30-AG-024827; and the Yale Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center P30AG021342. Dr. Miner is supported by T32AG1934 and the John A. Hartford Center of Excellence at Yale. Dr. Vaz Fragoso is the recipient of a Veterans Administration Merit Award.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The editor in chief has reviewed the conflict of interest checklist provided by the authors and has determined that the authors have no financial or any other kind of personal conflicts with this paper.

Author contributions: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Dr. Brienne Miner had full access to study data and takes responsibility for data integrity and accuracy of data analysis. Author contributions included: conception and design— Brienne Miner, Mary E. Tinetti, Peter H. Van Ness, Ling Han, Linda Leo-Summers, Anne B. Newman, Patty J. Lee, and Carlos A. Vaz Fragoso; analysis and interpretation— Brienne Miner, Mary E. Tinetti, Peter H. Van Ness, Ling Han, Linda Leo-Summers, Anne B. Newman, Patty J. Lee, and Carlos A. Vaz Fragoso; and drafting the manuscript for intellectual content— Brienne Miner, Mary E. Tinetti, Peter H. Van Ness, Ling Han, Linda Leo-Summers, Anne B. Newman, Patty J. Lee, and Carlos A. Vaz Fragoso.

Sponsor’s Role: The investigators retained full independence in the conduct of this research and report no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.van Mourik Y, Rutten FH, Moons KG, et al. Prevalence and underlying causes of dyspnoea in older people: A systematic review. Age Ageing. 2014;43:319–326. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ho SF, O’Mahony MS, Steward JA, et al. Dyspnoea and quality of life in older people at home. Age Ageing. 2001;30:155–159. doi: 10.1093/ageing/30.2.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vaz Fragoso C, Araujo KLB, Leo-Summers L, et al. Lower extremity muscle function and dyspnea in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63:1628–1633. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tessier JF, Nejjari C, Letenneur L, et al. Dyspnea and 8-year mortality among elderly men and women: The PAQUID cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17:223–229. doi: 10.1023/a:1017977715073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mentz RJ, Mi X, Sharma PP, Qualls LG, et al. Relation of dyspnea severity on admission for acute heart failure with outcomes and costs. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.09.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vaz Fragoso CA, Beavers DP, Hankinson JL, et al. Respiratory impairment and dyspnea and their associations with physical inactivity and mobility in sedentary community-dwelling older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62:622–628. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Enright P, Kronmal RA, Higgins MW, et al. Prevalence and correlates of respiratory symptoms and disease in the elderly. Chest. 1994;106:827–834. doi: 10.1378/chest.106.3.827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Freid VM, Bernstein AB, Bush MA. Multiple chronic conditions among adults aged 45 and over: Trends over the past 10 years. NCHS data brief. 2012:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Marcus BS, McAvay G, Gill TM, Vaz Fragoso CA. Respiratory symptoms, spirometric respiratory impairment, and respiratory disease in middle-aged and older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63:251–257. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pedersen F, Raymond I, Mehlsen J, et al. Prevalence of diastolic dysfunction as a possible cause of dyspnea in the elderly. Am J Med. 2005;118:25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.07.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Karapolat H, Eyigor S, Atasever A, et al. Effect of dyspnea and clinical variables on the quality of life and functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure. Chinese Med J. 2008;121:592–596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sue DY, Wasserman K. Impact of integrative cardiopulmonary exercise testing on clinical decision making. Chest. 1991;99:981–992. doi: 10.1378/chest.99.4.981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.American Thoracic Society Dyspnea. Mechanisms, assessment, and management: A consensus statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:321–340. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.ats898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians (ATS/ACCP) Statement on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:211–277. doi: 10.1164/rccm.167.2.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Parshall MB, Schwartzstein RM, Adams L, et al. An official American Thoracic Society statement: Update on the mechanisms, assessment, and management of dyspnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:435–452. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201111-2042ST. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fried LP, Borhani NO, Enright P, et al. The Cardiovascular Health Study: Design and rationale. Ann Epidemiol. 1991;1:263–276. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(91)90005-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ferris BG. Epidemiology Standardization Project (American Thoracic Society) Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978;118:1–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hajiro T, Nishimura K, Tsukino M, et al. A comparison of the level of dyspnea vs disease severity in indicating the health-related quality of life of patients with COPD. Chest. 1999;116:1632–1637. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.6.1632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cigolle CT, Langa KM, Kabeto MU, et al. Geriatric conditions and disability: The Health and Retirement Study. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:156–164. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-3-200708070-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tinetti ME. Clinical practice. Preventing falls in elderly persons. NEJM. 2003;348:42–49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp020719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tinetti ME, Williams CS, Gill TM. Dizziness among older adults: A possible geriatric syndrome. Ann Internal Med. 2000;132:337–344. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-5-200003070-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Inouye SK, Bogardus ST, Jr., Charpentier PA, et al. A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. NEJM. 1999;340:669–676. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903043400901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.American Thoracic Society Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. American Rev Respir Dis. 1991;144:1202–1218. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.5.1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:319–338. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:948–968. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00035205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Centers for Disease Control Prevention Vital signs: nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand smoke --- United States, 1999-2008. MMWR. 2010;59:1141–1146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: The global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:1324–1343. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00080312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stanojevic S, Wade A, Stocks J, et al. Reference ranges for spirometry across all ages: A new approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:253–260. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200708-1248OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vaz Fragoso CA, Gill TM. Respiratory impairment and the aging lung: A novel paradigm for assessing pulmonary function. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2012;67:264–275. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glr198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hirsch CH, Fried LP, Harris T, et al. Correlates of performance-based measures of muscle function in the elderly: The Cardiovascular Health Study. J Gerontol Med Sci. 1997;52:M192–200. doi: 10.1093/gerona/52a.4.m192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Enright PL, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, et al. Cardiovascular Health Study Research Group Respiratory muscle strength in the elderly. Correlates and reference values. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149:430–438. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.2.8306041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Aurigemma GP, Gottdiener JS, Shemanski L, et al. Predictive value of systolic and diastolic function for incident congestive heart failure in the elderly: The cardiovascular health study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1042–1048. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01110-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vaz Fragoso CA, Hsu FC, Brinkley T, et al. Combined reduced forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and peripheral artery disease in sedentary elders with functional limitations. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15:665–670. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rutan GH, Hermanson B, Bild DE, et al. Orthostatic hypotension in older adults. Hypertension. 1992;19:508–519. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.19.6.508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: Report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8) JAMA. 2014;311:507–520. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Janssen I. Influence of sarcopenia on the development of physical disability: The Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:56–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00540.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Janssen I, Baumgartner RN, Ross R, et al. Skeletal muscle cutpoints associated with elevated physical disability risk in older men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:413–421. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–156. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kohout FJ, Berkman LF, Evans DA, et al. Two shorter forms of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression) depression symptoms index. J Aging Health. 1993;5:179–193. doi: 10.1177/089826439300500202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Boyd JH, Weissman MM, Thompson WD, et al. Screening for depression in a community sample. Understanding the discrepancies between depression symptom and diagnostic scales. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39:1195–1200. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290100059010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Orme JG, Reis J, Herz EJ. Factorial and discriminant validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale. J Clin Psychol. 1986;42:28–33. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198601)42:1<28::aid-jclp2270420104>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fried TR, Vaz Fragoso CA, Rabow MW. Caring for the older person with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA. 2012;308(12):1254–1263. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.12422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Beutler E, Waalen J. The definition of anemia: What is the lower limit of normal of the blood hemoglobin concentration? Blood. 2006;107:1747–1750. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-07-3046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Csuka M, McCarty DJ. Simple method for measurement of lower extremity muscle strength. Am J Med. 1985;78:77–81. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90465-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Agarwal S, Kiely PD. Two simple, reliable and valid tests of proximal muscle function, and their application to the management of idiopathic inflammatory myositis. Rheumatology. 2006;45:874–879. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: Implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005;294:716–724. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.6.716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Clark N, Fan VS, Slatore CG, et al. Dyspnea and pain frequently co-occur among medicare managedcare recipients. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11:890–897. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201310-369OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Johnson MJ, Bland JM, Gahbauer EA, et al. Breathlessness in elderly adults during the last year of life sufficient to restrict activity: Prevalence, pattern, and associated factors. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64:73–80. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Peacock AJ, Murphy NF, McMurray JJV, et al. An epidemiological study of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2007;30:104–109. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00092306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES