Abstract
Identifying and refining small-animal models of tuberculosis that recapitulate aspects of human Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection can contribute to advancing our understanding of critical facets of the disease. To study the effects of very low-dose infections with 2 strains of M. tuberculosis on disease progression and survival in common marmosets, animals were challenged with strains Erdman and CDC1551 at doses ranging from 1 to 12 cfu. These data revealed that the susceptibility of marmosets to M. tuberculosis infection is influenced by strain virulence and initial dose. Marmoset infection with the Erdman strain, even at very low doses, resulted in rapid disease progression associated with severe weight loss, extensive pathology, and poor survival. By contrast, challenge with the less virulent CDC1551 strain resulted in slower disease progression, delayed weight loss, and prolonged survival. One marmoset infected with CDC1551 at a very low dose (approximately 1 cfu) was able to contain and control M. tuberculosis infection in a subclinical state that persisted as long as 300 d. These findings underscore the critical importance of understanding the heterogeneity in host outcome that can arise in association with different infectious doses and strains in the marmoset model of tuberculosis.
Abbreviations: PET–CT, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography–CT imaging
Tuberculosis remains a risk to global public health, with 9.6 million new cases of active tuberculosis and 1.5 million deaths in 2014.23 Although most humans contain Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a clinically asymptomatic infection termed ‘latent tuberculosis,’ a smaller subset (approximately 10%) of patients present initially with primary active disease or subsequent disease reactivation over the course of their lifetime.18 The biologic basis for the disease spectrum of M. tuberculosis in humans is unknown and continues to be an active area of research.
Several animal models have been adapted for experimental M. tuberculosis infection, greatly contributing to our understanding of tuberculosis biology.8 NHP models of tuberculosis, particularly cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis)3,15 and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta),4,20 are recognized as the most faithful animal models in replicating the human spectrum of disease in terms of both pathology and infection outcome.3,9,12,13 In addition, the recently developed common marmoset model of tuberculosis (Callithrix jacchus)22 replicates crucial facets of human tuberculosis, including cavitary disease. This model demonstrated divergent rates of disease progression after challenge with 3 strains—a Beijing isolate, the less virulent strain CDC1551, and M. africanum—and 2 different inocula (250 and 25 cfu). Notably, each infection resulted in rapid pulmonary disease presentation and weight loss, and all animals died by 75 d after challenge, thus reflecting the inherent susceptibility of common marmosets to this infection.
The influence of M. tuberculosis dose and strain on host outcome has been examined in several animal models. For example, BALB/c mice demonstrated a broad range of virulence, bacterial load, and pathology after infection with 19 different M. tuberculosis complex strains of 11 major genotype families.7 These 19 strains were segregated according to their virulence, bacterial burden, pathology, and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses as high, intermediate, and low responders. Strains that were classified as high responders induced the most pathology, greatest bacterial burden and highest mortality and included the isolates Beijing 2 and 3, Africa 2, and Somalia 2. At the other end of the spectrum, those strains that elicited the least severe pathologic scores caused no or minimal mortality after 112 d, yielded the lowest bacterial load, and included the isolates H37Rv, Canetti, and Beijing 1.7 A recent review examined the virulence and immunogenicity of several genotypic lineages of M. tuberculosis in mice and related these findings to observed human epidemiologic data.10 Overall, virulence and immune response vary extensively within each genotype, with many genotypes having both high- and low-virulence variants. Furthermore, rabbits (like mice) demonstrate an influence of dose, strain, and growth phase on tubercle formation and virulence, and M. tuberculosis strain Erdman had the greatest virulence in rabbits, requiring the fewest inhaled bacilli to generate visible tubercles at 5 wk.16
Whether common marmosets have any capacity to control M. tuberculosis infection or are universally susceptible to developing active tuberculosis, even with low-dose inocula, has not been determined to date. In this study, we aimed to better characterize the disease phenotypes and host outcomes of common marmosets after M. tuberculosis infection by challenging animals with very low doses (less than 15 cfu) of the Erdman and CDC1551 strains.
Materials and Methods
Animals.
Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) were obtained from the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center (Madison, WI). Prior to shipment, the animals were tested for Campylobacter, Shigella, Salmonella, Giardia, Cryptosporidium, Entamoeba, and Balantidium. On arrival at the University of Pittsburgh, the marmosets were screened for M. tuberculosis infection and other comorbidities during a month-long quarantine. More specifically, each macaque underwent complete baseline blood and biochemical analyses, 2 tape tests to screen for pinworms, and Giardia ELISA with 2 pooled fecal sets. All marmosets were housed and maintained according to the practices and standards detailed in the Animal Welfare Act2 and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals11 within a biosafety level 3 facility. These NHP were housed in a 4 × 4 macaque cage system, with the internal dividers removed to allow for open access and opportunities for climbing to the top and bottom of the cage. A nest box was included in the upper part of the cage, and the animals were fed a specialized marmoset diet (as advised by Dr Saverio Capuano, Wisconsin Primate Center). In some cases, infected animals were cohoused with naïve cagemates for a separate transmission study. The IACUC at the University of Pittsburgh approved all protocols and experiments.
Infection and necropsy.
Common marmosets were infected with either the virulent Erdman strain of M. tuberculosis or CDC1551 at doses of 1 to 12 cfu, as determined by plating the inoculum. One animal in the Erdman cohort was infected by aerosol, and the remaining marmosets were infected through bronchoscopic instillation, as previously described.3 In brief, a disinfected bronchoscope was placed into the desired bronchus and 0.2 mL of sterile saline containing the appropriate infection inoculum was instilled. For the marmoset infected by aerosol, an infection inoculum was administered through a 10-min exposure to aerosolized bacilli created by a 3-jet Collison nebulizer (BGI, Waltham, MA) controlled by the AeroMP bioaerosol exposure system (Biaera Technologies, Hagerstown, MD) in a head-only exposure chamber (CH Technologies, Westwood, NJ) within a class III biologic safety cabinet (Baker, Sanford, ME). After infection, all marmosets were clinically monitored for signs of infection according to previously published methods,3,15 and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography–CT (PET–CT) scans were performed monthly, as previously described.5,6,22 Marmosets were euthanized when they lost more than 20% of their preinfection body weight or when they exhibited substantial clinical signs of disease (for example, lethargy and anorexia). At necropsy, a gross pathology score for each marmoset was determined according to our published scoring system,15 which evaluates tuberculosis-specific disease in all lung lobes, thoracic lymph nodes, and extrapulmonary sites. Overall bacterial burden scores and cfu counts for individual granulomas, regions of complex pathology (for example, tuberculosis pneumonia), and thoracic lymph nodes were quantified and calculated as previously described.14,15 Briefly, multiple individual tissue samples in each marmoset were identified by using PET–CT imaging as a guide, excised, and plated at necropsy, and bacterial colonies were counted 21 d after necropsy. The cfu score for each animal was determined by summation of each tissue's log-transformation of bacterial burden, thus providing a relative comparator for all marmosets. In comparison, the total cfu count was the sum of the actual number of bacilli in all samples taken from the animal, and thus provided a more accurate representation of the bacterial burden.
Results
Host outcome and survival after M. tuberculosis infection in marmosets.
To determine the clinical progression and disease pathology of very low-dose infection, 9 marmosets were challenged with 2 different strains of M. tuberculosis at doses of 1 to 12 cfu (Table 1). Inocula were determined by plating at the time of challenge. All but one of the marmosets in this study were infected by direct instillation of bacteria into the airways by using a bronchoscope. The marmoset that received 12 cfu of the Erdman strain (animal no. 3012) was infected through aerosol dispersion. All marmosets infected with the Erdman strain (dose range, 1 to 12 cfu, with most animals infected with 2 cfu) presented with rapidly progressing disease regardless of dose. Clinically, all of these marmosets exhibited physical signs of illness, including inactivity, reclusiveness, and diminished appetite. The animals exhibited precipitous weight loss after infection and arrived at the weight-loss threshold of 20% by 45 d after infection (median, 39 d), requiring euthanasia (Figure 1). Coughing was observed in a subset of animals (marmosets 13210, 13310, 13410, 13610, 13710, and 3412). At necropsy, all animals infected with strain Erdman had gross pathology scores that exceeded 30 (median score, 41; Table 1).
Table 1.
Animal no. | Bacterial strain | Infection dose (no. of cfu) | Survival (d) | Gross pathology score | CFU score | % of tissue samples containing bacteria |
13210 | Erdman | 2 | 39 | 49 | 142 | 100 |
13310 | 2 | 35 | 56 | 164 | 100 | |
13410 | 2 | 37 | 41 | 158 | 100 | |
13610 | 2 | 38 | 31 | 123 | 100 | |
13710 | 2 | 40 | 33 | 137 | 95.2 | |
3012 | 12 | 32 | 53 | 144 | 100 | |
3412 | 1 | 43 | 33 | 107 | 100 | |
3713 | CDC1551 | 1 | 307 | 25 | 26 | 32 |
3913 | 7 | 89 | 66 | 53 | 100 |
By contrast, the 2 marmosets challenged with strain CDC1551 (dose, 1 or 7 cfu) had divergent outcomes associated with dose but demonstrated reduced overall disease compared with that of marmosets infected with strain Erdman. The marmoset that received 7 cfu of the CDC1551 strain (animal no. 3913) had mild to moderate disease progression and steady weight loss and survived to 89 d (Table 1 and Figure 1). Surprisingly, the marmoset that received 1 cfu of CDC1551 (animal no. 3713) had mild disease progression, with a sustained period of weight loss in this animal beginning on day 76 that was not accompanied by any other clinical signs of disease. By day 174, this marmoset was regaining weight and returned to its initial weight by day 282 (Figure 1). This marmoset was euthanized after the conclusion of the study on day 307; euthanasia was not due to weight loss or clinical morbidity. The marmoset inoculated with 7 cfu had a gross pathology score of 66, whereas the marmoset inoculated with 1 CFU had a score of 25 (Table 1).
In vivo PET–CT imaging.
To compare in vivo disease progression between strains and doses, all marmosets were followed by using serial PET–CT imaging;5,6 we here present 2 representative animals from each cohort for comparison. For strain Erdman, 2 marmosets (nos. 3012 and 3412) were imaged and compared with 2 animals infected with CDC1551 (nos. 3913 and 3713). Both sets of animals represented the highest and lowest dose administered for each strain (Table 1). In agreement with clinical and weight observations, these marmosets had differing rates of disease progression, as demonstrated by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. Relative to their baseline scans, both Erdman-infected marmosets had activity indicative of pulmonary and lymphatic disease on their 4-wk postinfection PET–CT scans (Figure 2, yellow arrows), whereas the 2 animals challenged with CDC1551 had normal scans without disease, thus reflecting the slower progression associated with this strain. The prenecropsy scan for each animal was obtained just a few days prior to euthanasia. Given the rapid loss of body weight that necessitated early euthanasia in the 2 Erdman-infected marmosets, the 4-wk scans served as their prenecropsy scans. By contrast, the disease in the CDC1551-infected marmosets progressed more slowly (prenecropsy scans at weeks 12 and 44). In particular, marmoset 3913 had significant disease in the right lower lung lobe and thoracic lymph nodes (Figure 2, yellow arrows), and marmoset 3713 (dose, 1 cfu of CDC1551) had very little 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake during his prenecropsy scan at 300 d after infection.
Overall bacterial burden and extent of dissemination.
Comparisons of bacterial burden (cfu scores)15 and the number of bacteria per tissue sample (granuloma, lymph node, tuberculosis pneumonia)14 revealed strain- and dose-dependent differences dependent (Table 1 and Figure 3). All of the Erdman-infected marmosets (including the one that received a dose of 1 cfu) had cfu scores above 100 (median, 142) and more than 95% of the tissues cultured were positive for M. tuberculosis (Table 1), indicative of prominent and widespread disease. By contrast, the 2 marmosets challenged with 7 and 1 cfu of CDC1551 had cfu scores of 53 and 26, respectively, supporting the finding that bacterial burden is related to dose for this strain (Figure 3 A). The inoculation dose of 7 cfu of CDC1551 resulted in 100% of tissues that were positive for tubercular bacilli, whereas the infection due to the 1-cfu dose was contained to a much greater extent, with only 32% of tissues positive for bacteria (Table 1). Two marmosets from the Erdman group (no. 3012, inoculated with 12 cfu, and no. 3412, which received 1 cfu) were selected for more precise comparison of tissue burden with the 2 animals infected with CDC1551 (marmosets 3913 and 3713). Comparisons of each animal's cumulative bacterial burden (total cfu counts among all lung and lymph node samples) revealed that 3 of the marmosets had cumulative burdens that exceeded 5 × 106 cfu, with little difference between the lung and lymph-node compartments (Figure 3 B). In contrast, the total bacterial load in the marmoset infected with 1 cfu of CDC1551 (no. 3713) was nearly 100-fold lower than that in the other 3 (Figure 3 B), with the vast majority of the burden contributed by infected thoracic lymph nodes (Figure 3 C). Assessing each tissue separately revealed that the median lung or lymph node bacterial burden was higher in the 2 animals that received the higher dose within each strain (Figure 3 C). Lymph nodes had the greatest variability across the different tissues, and the highest burdens occurred in regions of lung tuberculosis pneumonia. Most notably, the tissue bacterial burden in the marmoset that received 1 cfu of CDC1551 ranged from primarily sterile sites to the moderately infected superior pretracheal lymph node, which had 6.4 × 104 cfu.
Gross and histologic disease pathology after challenge with very low doses of M. tuberculosis.
Comparison of gross pathology at necropsy (Figure 4) revealed marked differences in the magnitude and extent of disease progression. For example, marmoset 3412, which was infected with 1 cfu of the Erdman strain, demonstrated pulmonary disease that was grossly limited to the left lower lung (Figure 4 A), with concomitant enlargement and effacement of the left thoracic lymph nodes (Figure 4 B). The left lower lobe showed extensive tuberculous pneumonia, with a central focal area of severe necrotizing consolidation (2 cm); the lobe completely lacked any normal, aerated lung parenchyma. Gross examination of the spleen and liver revealed enlargement of both organs, with numerous (20 or more) granulomas (diameter, pinpoint to 1 mm or greater) throughout (Figure 4 C).
By contrast, gross examination of tissues from the marmoset infected with 1 cfu of CDC1551 (no. 3713) revealed 2 relatively well-circumscribed lesions in the left (lesion diameter, 1.5 mm) and right (10 mm) lower lobes (Figure 4 D); there were 4 additional discrete lesions (diameter, 2 mm or less) in the right lower lobe. The inferior and superior pretracheal lymph nodes were both enlarged, with significant effacement in the superior node (Figure 4 E). The liver (Figure 4 F) and spleen had no readily identifiable gross lesions. The liver was markedly enlarged, extending several centimeters below the costal region, and had an accentuated lobular appearance, with several large, irregular, superficial regions of parenchymal pallor. This discoloration was likely due to differential blood settling, euthanasia-solution–induced hepatocellular artifact, or glycogenation; there was no gross indication of tuberculosis throughout this organ.
Histopathology of lung, thoracic lymph nodes, spleen, and liver largely confirmed the findings at necropsy. For the marmoset challenged with 1 cfu of the Erdman strain (animal 3412), the region of tuberculosis pneumonia in the left lower lobe consisted of extremely neutrophil-rich inflammatory infiltrate, extending from alveolus to alveolus. Centrally, there was a large area of coagulative necrosis with near total effacement of all recognizable tissue architecture. There was minimal evidence of the formation of architecturally organized granuloma structures per se within the entirety of the large necrotizing region (Figure 5 A). The left cranial hilar lymph node displayed extensive nodal effacement, with regions of necrotizing and nonnecrotizing inflammation with poor structural organization (Figure 5 B). Examination of the spleen (Figure 5 C) and liver (Figure 5 D) revealed multiple regions of caseous and nonnecrotizing granulomas, indicative of widespread disseminated disease.
In the marmoset challenged with 1 cfu of CDC1551 (animal 3713), the left lower lung lobe contained a single, caseous granuloma that was well circumscribed and had a prominent lymphocytic cuff (Figure 5 D). In contrast to lung, the superior pretracheal lymph node had prominent coalescing and effacing caseous granulomas, with evidence of early collagen fibril formation within the necrotic matrix (Figure 5 E). Despite the lack of gross disease at necropsy, this marmoset had microscopic evidence of splenic tuberculosis, with multiple, small minimally necrotizing granulomas (Figure 5 F). In addition, sections of liver exhibited several focal areas containing caseous granulomas and small, nonnecrotizing sinusoidal granulomas (Figure 5 F).
Overall, the gross and microscopy pathology mirrored the clinical differences in these 2 marmosets and reiterate the distinction between the 2 strains, even at very low doses. Similar extensive gross and microscopic disease was present in all marmosets infected with the Erdman strain as well as in the animal infected with 7 cfu of strain CDC1551. Importantly, despite the marked difference in the general histologic appearance between the 2 CDC1551-infected animals and the more immunologically contained response in the marmoset challenged with 1 cfu, this marmoset had numerous microscopic findings that suggested that the disease was entering a more widely disseminating stage. The presence of numerous small nonnecrotizing granulomas and epithelioid cell aggregates within thoracic lymph nodes as well as the microscopic granulomas in the hepatic and splenic parenchyma indicated the onset of more fulminant and progressive disease prior to necropsy.
Discussion
Here we report the diverse disease progression and host outcome patterns that occurred after the infection of common marmosets with very low doses (1 to 12 cfu) of 2 strains of M. tuberculosis. The susceptibility of marmosets to the Erdman strain was unrelated to dose or route. However, the inoculation dose may be an important determinant of outcome after challenge with the less virulent CDC1551 strain. All of the marmosets challenged with low doses of strain Erdman presented with fulminant, disseminating active tuberculosis, had a median survival time of 39 d, and had evidence of invasive necrotizing alveolitis and tuberculosis pneumonia, with little evidence of well-circumscribed granulomas. In contrast, infection with CDC1551 promoted a more slowly progressing infection overall; the marmoset that received 7 cfu survived to 89 d, and the animal given 1 cfu survived more than 300 d. To our knowledge, this is the first reported instance of apparent recovery, stabilization, and survival beyond 300 d of a marmoset infected with a strain of M. tuberculosis.
Our initial findings recapitulated those reported by our colleagues, who also described differential disease progression between several strains within the M. tuberculosis complex.22 This previous study compared CDC1551, M. africanum N0091, and a Beijing K04 isolate at doses of 25 and 250 cfu; all 3 strains at both doses produced fulminant disease and prompted euthanasia by 80 d after infection due to weight loss.22 The rapid disease progression, high bacterial burden, and invasive necrotizing pathology associated with the Beijing K04 isolate is very similar to the disease evolution, bacterial load, and disease presentation in our marmosets that were infected with the virulent Erdman strain. The median survival time in the previous study was 37 d,22 similar to the 39 d for Erdman-infected marmosets in the current study. Moreover, the higher dose of the K04 isolate was the only case for which the rate of weight loss was significantly increased. Likewise, among the Erdman-infected marmosets in our study, the animal that received 12 cfu had the most rapid weight decline and was euthanized 32 d after infection. In contrast, infection with CDC1551 resulted in the slowest disease progression among the 3 strains evaluated previously and yielded a median survival time of 59 d.22 Notably, half of the marmosets infected with the CDC1551 strain previously developed cavitary lesions, a particular manifestation of human tuberculosis that is associated with erosion of lung parenchyma into the airway, facilitating bacterial transmission.19 In agreement with these findings, our marmoset that received 7 cfu of CDC1551 (no. 3913) demonstrated several sites of cavitation. A separate study performed by these collaborators21,22 followed marmosets infected with various low aerosol doses of CDC1551 for weight loss in infected animals prior to drug treatment at 7 wk. Little to no weight loss was seen in the animals exposed to 1 to 2 CFU, whereas infection with higher doses significantly increased weight loss percentage (data not shown) suggesting that the route of infection was not directly responsible for the difference observed in the marmoset infected with 1 CFU of CDC1551 presented here.
Extending the published findings, we present data supportive of long-term control of infection in a single marmoset. Infection with approximately 1 cfu of CDC 1551 presented as 2 primary lesions, one in each of the lower lung lobes, as determined by PET–CT imaging5,6 (Figure 2). Except for a period of transient weight loss beginning at day 76 after infection, this marmoset showed no other sign of clinical morbidity. Close observation by PET–CT imaging revealed that the lesion in the right lower lobe gradually increased in tracer uptake, whereas the signal in the lesion in the opposite lobe gradually decreased, suggesting at least partial immunologic control and disease resolution. This apparent discrepancy between the 2 individual lesions is characteristic of the independent nature of granulomas even within the same NHP host.6,14 These results were confirmed at necropsy, in that the lesion in the left lower lobe was sterile (that is, yielded no organisms by plating), whereas the lesion in the right lower lobe had approximately 2.6 × 103 bacteria. However, the microscopic pathology in the nodal lymph nodes and the presence of microscopic granulomas in the liver and spleen suggest that the infection may have been entering a more invasive stage, albeit at a slower rate than reported for all other marmosets to date. The histologic characteristics of the 2 lung lesions from this animal were distinct from the granulomas excised from the marmoset infected with 7 cfu of the same strain and from any of marmosets challenged with the Erdman strain. The left lower lobe lesion was an archetypical caseous granuloma with a well-circumscribed lymphocytic cuff, whereas the right lower lobe lesion had areas of tuberculosis pneumonia and nonnecrotizing granulomas. All of the Erdman-infected animals had a predominance of invasive, neutrophil-rich granulomatous alveolitis in their pulmonary sites that exhibited occasional organization and circumcision but did not form traditional defined granulomatous structures. Overall, the recovery of body weight and the lack of clinical manifestations coupled with the postmortem observations of decreased total cfu counts, diminished bacterial dissemination, and less extensive gross pathology suggest that the marmoset's greater capacity to limit disease progression was likely due to the reduced virulence of CDC1551 and the very low infection dose.
The primary limitation of our study is that the stable but chronic infection phenotype has only been observed in the single marmoset described. However, we found a strong relationship between the infectious dose of CDC1551 and weight loss in marmosets. Further infections with 1 to 3 cfu of CDC1551 are warranted in this small animal model to better define the mechanisms of control of low-dose infection. If this NHP species does exhibit relative resistance to M. tuberculosis in a persistent manner, it would broaden their applicability as a small animal model of tuberculosis to include chronic infection studies yet retain their inherent benefits as a NHP model that offers decreased cost, small size,17 dizygotic twinning,1 pliability for drug studies,21 and the ability to replicate aspects of human disease.17,22 In addition, marmosets might be developed as a model for vaccine-induced protection against tuberculosis.
In conclusion, optimizing the common marmoset (C. jacchus) model of M. tuberculosis infection requires identification of the range of host outcomes for this NHP species. In the current study, we noted variable disease progression in marmosets challenged with very low doses (1 to 12 cfu) of 2 strains of M. tuberculosis. Both the dose and strain of M. tuberculosis influenced the outcomes after challenge. Very low-dose challenge with the virulent Erdman strain did not ameliorate the rate of disease progression, because all of these marmosets (even those infected with 1 to 2 cfu) presented with rapidly disseminating active disease, resulting in clinical decline that prompted euthanasia by 43 d after inoculation. Infection with the less virulent CDC1551 strain resulted in delayed disease progression that was somewhat dependent on the inoculation dose. One of the most striking findings was that challenge with approximately 1 cfu of CDC1551 produced one case in which a marmoset effectively controlled the M. tuberculosis infection in a subclinical state for more than 300 d. At necropsy, this marmoset had reduced bacterial burden in its involved lymph nodes and lungs, reduced tissue dissemination, less overt gross pathology, and mildly progressing histology. These findings are in stark contrast to all previously reported M. tuberculosis infections of common marmosets, thus potentially extending this small-animal model beyond studies of acute infection while maintaining the clinical spectrum observed in the human disease.
Acknowledgments
We thank Mark Rodgers, Carolyn Bigbee, Catherine Cochran, and Charles Scanga for technical assistance. We also thank Daniel Filmore for veterinary and animal assistance. We gratefully acknowledge Pauline Maiello and Teresa Coleman for imaging support and Danielle Weiner, Daniel Schimel, and Manny Dayao for veterinary assistance at NIAID. These studies were funded in part by a NIH training grant (T32 AI089443 [to AMC]), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (grant no. OPP1034408 [to JLF]), and the intramural research program of NIAID, NIH (to LEV).
References
- 1.Abbott DH, Barnett DK, Colman RJ, Yamamoto ME, Schultz-Darken NJ. 2003. Aspects of common marmoset basic biology and life history important for biomedical research. Comp Med 53:339–350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Animal Welfare Act as Amended. 2008. 7 USC §2131–2156.
- 3.Capuano SV, 3rd, Croix DA, Pawar S, Zinovik A, Myers A, Lin PL, Bissel S, Fuhrman C, Klein E, Flynn JL. 2003. Experimental mycobacterium tuberculosis infection of cynomolgus macaques closely resembles the various manifestations of human m. tuberculosis infection. Infect Immun 71:5831–5844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen CY, Huang D, Wang RC, Shen L, Zeng G, Yao S, Shen Y, Halliday L, Fortman J, McAllister M, Estep J, Hunt R, Vasconcelos D, Du G, Porcelli SA, Larsen MH, Jacobs WR, Jr, Haynes BF, Letvin NL, Chen ZW. 2009. A critical role for CD8 T cells in a nonhuman primate model of tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Coleman MT, Chen RY, Lee M, Lin PL, Dodd LE, Maiello P, Via LE, Kim Y, Marriner G, Dartois V, Scanga C, Janssen C, Wang J, Klein E, Cho SN, Barry CE, 3rd, Flynn JL. 2014. PET/CT imaging reveals a therapeutic response to oxazolidinones in macaques and humans with tuberculosis. Sci Transl Med 6:265ra167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Coleman MT, Maiello P, Tomko J, Frye LJ, Fillmore D, Janssen C, Klein E, Lin PL. 2014. Early changes by (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography coregistered with computed tomography predict outcome after Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in cynomolgus macaques. Infect Immun 82:2400–2404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dormans J, Burger M, Aguilar D, Hernandez-Pando R, Kremer K, Roholl P, Arend SM, van Soolingen D. 2004. Correlation of virulence, lung pathology, bacterial load and delayed type hypersensitivity responses after infection with different Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypes in a BALB/c mouse model. Clin Exp Immunol 137:460–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Flynn JL. 2006. Lessons from experimental Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections. Microbes Infect 8:1179–1188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Flynn JL, Chan J, Lin PL. 2011. Macrophages and control of granulomatous inflammation in tuberculosis. Mucosal Immunol 4:271–278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hernandez-Pando R, Marquina-Castillo B, Barrios-Payan J, Mata-Espinosa D. 2012. Use of mouse models to study the variability in virulence associated with specific genotypic lineages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Genet Evol 12:725–731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. 2011. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, 8th ed Washington (DC): National Academies Press. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kaushal D, Mehra S, Didier PJ, Lackner AA. 2012. The nonhuman primate model of tuberculosis. J Med Primatol.41:191–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lin PL, Flynn JL. 2010. Understanding latent tuberculosis: a moving target. J Immunol 185:15–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lin PL, Ford CB, Coleman MT, Myers AJ, Gawande R, Ioerger T, Sacchettini J, Fortune SM, Flynn JL. 2014. Sterilization of granulomas is common in active and latent tuberculosis despite within-host variability in bacterial killing. Nat Med 20:75–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lin PL, Rodgers M, Smith L, Bigbee M, Myers A, Bigbee C, Chiosea I, Capuano SV, Fuhrman C, Klein E, Flynn JL. 2009. Quantitative comparison of active and latent tuberculosis in the cynomolgus macaque model. Infect Immun 77:4631–4642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Manabe YC, Dannenberg AM, Tyagi SK, Hatem CL, Yoder M, Woolwine SC, Zook BC, Pitt MLM, Bishai WR. 2003. Different strains of mycobacterium tuberculosis cause various spectrums of disease in the rabbit model of tuberculosis. Infect Immun 71:6004–6011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mansfield K. 2003. Marmoset models commonly used in biomedical research. Comp Med 53:383–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.O'Garra A, Redford PS, McNab FW, Bloom CI, Wilkinson RJ, Berry MP. 2013. The immune response in tuberculosis. Annu Rev Immunol 31:475–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ong CW, Elkington PT, Friedland JS. 2014. Tuberculosis, pulmonary cavitation, and matrix metalloproteinases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 190:9–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Verreck FA, Vervenne RA, Kondova I, van Kralingen KW, Remarque EJ, Braskamp G, van der Werff NM, Kersbergen A, Ottenhoff TH, Heidt PJ, Gilbert SC, Gicquel B, Hill AV, Martin C, McShane H, Thomas AW. 2009. MVA.85A boosting of BCG and an attenuated, phoP deficient M. tuberculosis vaccine both show protective efficacy against tuberculosis in rhesus macaques. PLoS One 4:e5264 Erratum in: Plos One 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Via LE, England K, Weiner DM, Schimel D, Zimmerman MD, Dayao E, Chen RY, Dodd LE, Richardson M, Robbins KK, Cai Y, Hammoud D, Herscovitch P, Dartois V, Flynn JL, Barry CE., 3rd 2015. A sterilizing tuberculosis treatment regimen is associated with faster clearance of bacteria in cavitary lesions in marmosets. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:4181–4189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Via LE, Weiner DM, Schimel D, Lin PL, Dayao E, Tankersley SL, Cai Y, Coleman MT, Tomko J, Paripati P, Orandle M, Kastenmayer RJ, Tartakovsky M, Rosenthal A, Portevin D, Eum SY, Lahouar S, Gagneux S, Young DB, Flynn JL, Barry CE., 3rd 2013. Differential virulence and disease progression following mycobacterium tuberculosis complex infection of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Infect Immun 81:2909–2919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zumla A, George A, Sharma V, Herbert RH, Baroness Masham of Ilton. Oxley A, Oliver M. 2015. The WHO 2014 global tuberculosis report–further to go. Lancet Glob Health 3:e10–e12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]