Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2016 Oct 21;11(10):e0164983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164983

Three Toxic Heavy Metals in Open-Angle Glaucoma with Low-Teen and High-Teen Intraocular Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study from South Korea

Si Hyung Lee 1,2, Eun Min Kang 1, Gyu Ah Kim 1, Seung Woo Kwak 3, Joon Mo Kim 4, Hyoung Won Bae 1, Gong Je Seong 1, Chan Yun Kim 1,*
Editor: James Fielding Hejtmancik5
PMCID: PMC5074541  PMID: 27768724

Abstract

Background

To investigate the association between heavy metal levels and open-angle glaucoma (OAG) with low- and high-teen baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) using a population-based study design.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 5,198 participants older than 19 years of age who participated in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) from 2008 to 2012 and had blood heavy metal levels available. The OAG with normal baseline IOP (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg) subjects were stratified into low-teen OAG (baseline IOP ≤ 15 mmHg) and high-teen OAG (15 mmHg < baseline IOP ≤ 21 mmHg), and the association between blood lead, mercury, and cadmium levels and glaucoma prevalence was assessed for low- and high-teen OAG.

Results

The adjusted geometric mean of blood cadmium levels was significantly higher in subjects with low-teen OAG than that of the non-glaucomatous group (P = 0.028), whereas there were no significant differences in blood lead and mercury levels. After adjusting for potential confounders, the low-teen OAG was positively associated with log-transformed blood cadmium levels (OR, 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03–1.93; P = 0.026). For high-teen OAG, log-transformed blood levels of the three heavy metals were not associated with disease prevalence. The association between log-transformed blood cadmium levels and low-teen OAG was significant only in men (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.10–2.48; P = 0.016), and not in women (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.66–1.85; P = 0.709).

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that cadmium toxicity could play a role in glaucoma pathogenesis, particularly in men and in OAG with low-teen baseline IOP.

Introduction

Glaucoma is among the leading causes of blindness worldwide [1], and open-angle glaucoma (OAG) is known to be the most prevalent form. In particular, normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), defined as OAG with an intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤ 21 mmHg, accounts for a significant fraction among all subtypes of glaucoma in Asian populations, especially in Korea and Japan [24]. Although IOP has been identified as one of the main risk factors for the development and progression of NTG, non-IOP factors have been suggested as a cause of glaucomatous optic nerve damage, particularly in patients with low-teen baseline IOP (≤15 mmHg) [59].

Heavy metals, ubiquitous environmental pollutants that typically have long biological half-lives in humans, have recently been suggested as risk factors for various chronic diseases, such as hypertension [1012], diabetes mellitus [13, 14], metabolic syndrome [15, 16], cardiovascular diseases [17, 18], and neurodegenerative diseases [19]. Moreover, a number of studies have reported that higher toxic heavy metal levels are significantly related to several ocular pathologies, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [20, 21], cataracts [2224], and pseudoexfoliation syndrome [2527]. A possible relationship between abnormal toxic heavy metal levels and optic nerve damage has also been suggested. Previous studies demonstrated an association between the body burden of lead and glaucoma [28, 29], and several experimental studies revealed that cadmium exposure induced impaired neurogenesis and axonal development [30, 31]. Although the evidence indicates that toxic heavy metals might have a role in the pathogenesis of glaucoma, their association with glaucoma remains poorly understood.

Using a population-based study design, we investigated whether blood concentrations of three toxic heavy metals (lead, mercury, and cadmium) are associated with the prevalence of OAG with normal IOP (OAG with baseline IOP ≤ 21 mmHg), low-teen OAG (OAG with baseline IOP ≤ 15 mmHg) and high-teen OAG (OAG with baseline IOP 15–21 mmHg). In addition, since previous studies revealed differences in heavy metal toxicity between men and women [16, 20, 28, 3234], we examined gender differences in the association between blood heavy metal levels and OAG prevalence.

Methods

Study population

The current study was based on data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), a nationwide, population-based, cross-sectional health examination and survey conducted by the Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, with approval from its Institutional Review Board (IRB).[35] The KNHANES adopted a multistage, stratified, probability-clustered sampling method. The target population of the survey included the civilian noninstitutional population of South Korea. The survey consisted of health records collected from a health interview, a health examination, and a nutrition survey. The interview included demographic, socioeconomic, health, and nutritional questions. Health examinations included vital signs, physiologic measurements, and basic laboratory tests. Ophthalmologic interview and examination data were available from the second half of 2008.

In this study, data from KNHANES IV (2008, 2009) and V (2010–2012) were used to investigate the association between blood lead, mercury, and cadmium levels and NTG. Among 45,811 participants, 32,949 individuals aged ≥19 years with ophthalmologic examination data were included for the study. For such population size, the calculated recommended sample size is 380 for 5% of margin of error and 95% confidence level. Among 32,949 participants, only a selected subpopulation underwent measurement of blood heavy metal concentrations. To provide nationally representative estimates, heavy metal measurements were performed in 10 randomly sampled participants from each district with age and sex stratification from the annual KNHANES databases. Three separate data sets were formed for heavy metals for statistical analyses. Participants with age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy were excluded, since these are the major causes of non-glaucomatous visual field defects and could result in the misdiagnosis of glaucoma.

The study design adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human subjects, and all survey participants provided written informed consent. IRB/Ethics Committee of Yonsei University Health System approval was obtained.

Ophthalmic survey components

The ophthalmologic examination consisted of ophthalmologic interviews, visual acuity measurements, IOP measurements, auto-refraction, slit-lamp examination, and fundus photography. The slit-lamp examination was performed to detect anterior segment abnormalities and measure anterior chamber depth using the Van Herick method. The spherical equivalent was calculated as sphere + 1/2 cylinder. IOP was measured once per eye from right to left with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (Haag-Streit model BQ-900; Haag-Streit Inc., Bern, Switzerland) by a trained ophthalmologist during the slit-lamp examination. A digital non-mydriatic retinal camera (TRC-NW6S; Topcon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and a Nikon D-80 digital camera (Nikon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) were used to obtain the digital fundus images, which were captured under physiological mydriasis. Based on the fundus images, horizontal and vertical cup-disc ratios (VCDRs) were measured, and any signs of diabetic retinopathy or age-related macular degeneration were checked.

A visual field test with frequency double technology was performed in participants who had elevated IOP (≥22 mmHg) or features indicative of glaucomatous optic disc. The indicative features of glaucomatous optic disc included: (1) horizontal or VCDR ≥ 0.5; (2) presence of optic disc hemorrhage; (3) presence of retinal nerve fiber layer defects; or (4) violation of the ISNT rule (i.e., normal eyes exhibit a characteristic configuration of neuroretinal rim thickness where: inferior > superior > nasal > temporal). Participants were considered to have OAG based on the modified International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology criteria for the Korean population. The specific diagnostic criteria are as follows. Category 1 requires both (1) a reliable visual field defect consistent with glaucoma (fixation error and false positive error ≤ 1 and the presence of at least two locations of reduced sensitivity) and (2) glaucomatous optic disc (neuroretinal rim loss with VCDR or horizontal cup-disc ratio ≥ 0.6 or the presence of optic disc hemorrhage or the presence of retinal nerve fiber layer defects or asymmetry of VCDR ≥ 0.2). Category 2, if a visual field test is not available or is unreliable (fixation error or false positive error ≥ 2), requires VCDR ≥ 0.9 or asymmetry of VCDR ≥ 0.3 or the presence of retinal nerve fiber layer defects and violation of the ISNT rule. Category 3 criteria, requiring a visual acuity ≤ 3/60 and an IOP > 21 mmHg, was not included as diagnostic criteria for glaucoma in this study. Subjects with a shallow anterior chamber (peripheral anterior chamber depth ≤ 1/4 of the central corneal thickness) were excluded. From the OAG with normal IOP group, participants were further categorized into low-teen OAG (IOP < 15 mmHg) and high-teen OAG (IOP ≥ 15 mmHg) groups.

Heavy metal levels

Blood lead and cadmium levels were measured using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (AAnalyst™ 600; Perkin-Elmer, Turku, Finland) and mercury levels were measured using the gold amalgamation method (DMA-80; Milestone, Sorisole, Italy). Blood samples were collected and stored in trace element ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for the heavy metal assays. The detection limits were 0.223, 0.087, and 0.05 μg/L for lead, cadmium, and mercury, respectively. The concentrations in all samples were higher than the detection limits. All blood analyses were carried out by the Seoul Medical Science Institute (SMSI) certified by the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. Internal and external quality control for this institute has been clearly described in a previous study [20].

Other traits

Demographic variables included age group, sex, area of residence, occupation, income, and education level, which were acquired from the health interviews. Regarding region of residence, the 16 districts of South Korea were divided into two groups: 1) urban regions, including Seoul, Gyeonggi, Busan, Daegu, Incheon, Gwangju, Daejeoun, and Ulsan; and 2) rural regions, including Gangwon, Chungbuk, Chungnam, Jeonnam, Jeonbuk, Gyeongbuk, Gyeongnam, and Jeju. Occupation was classified into three groups: 1) white collar, comprising managers, professionals, clerical support workers, and service and sales workers; 2) blue collar, including agriculture, forestry, fishery, craft, and related trade workers, plant and machine operators and assemblers, and simple labor; and 3) inoccupation, including unemployed, retired, students, and homemakers. Income status was quantified by quartile. Finally, education level was categorized as elementary school or less, middle school graduate, high school graduate, or college graduate and beyond.

The other covariates analyzed in this study were health-related behaviors as follows: smoking (ever or never); exercise (days per week); body mass index (BMI), estimated as weight/height (kg/m2), categorized into two groups: 1) BMI < 25 kg/m2 and 2) BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2; and medical comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and anemia. Blood samples were collected from all subjects by venipuncture after fasting for at least 8 h. Specimens were transported immediately to the central laboratory (Neodin Medical Institute, Seoul, Korea), where all blood samples were analyzed within 24 h. Subjects were defined as having hypertension if they had a history of taking antihypertensive medication or when the measured systolic or diastolic blood pressure was ≥140 or ≥90 mmHg, respectively. Participants who had been diagnosed with diabetes by physicians or had a fasting glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL were defined as having diabetes mellitus. Subjects were categorized as having anemia if their hemoglobin levels were <12 g/dL in non-pregnant women, <11d/gL in pregnant women, and <13 g/dL in men.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS statistical software (v. 9.3; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to account for the complex sampling design and provide nationally representative prevalence estimates. The PROC SURVEY procedures were used for each analysis, and the codes are briefly introduced in supplementary table (S1 Table). The demographic characteristics of the participants are presented as either means and standard error (SE) or proportions and SE. The Rao-Scott χ2 (for categorical variables) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) (for continuous variables) tests were used to compare participant characteristics and glaucoma diagnosis. Blood concentrations for lead, mercury, and cadmium were log-transformed because of their skewed distributions (P < 0.001; Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) (S2 Table), and geometric means and standard errors were compared using analysis of covariance after adjusting for age group, sex, region of residence, occupation, education level, smoking status, hypertension, family history of glaucoma, and intraocular pressure.

Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between the prevalence of glaucoma and blood heavy metal concentrations. For the logistic regression analyses, three models were established: model 1 used simple logistic regression; model 2 adjusted for age group and sex; and model 3 adjusted for model 2 and other potential confounding variables. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the prevalence of glaucoma were estimated for each heavy metal. In all analyses, P-values were two-tailed; P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Of the 32,949 participants aged ≥19, 9,111 participants underwent measurement of blood heavy metal concentrations and ophthalmic examination. Among these participants, we excluded participants with following criteria: IOP > 21 mmHg (n = 20), shallow peripheral angle (n = 111), any signs of diabetic retinopathy or age-related macular degeneration (n = 1,043), history of any glaucoma medical treatment (n = 27), history of glaucoma, refractive or retinal surgery (n = 242), and missing values (n = 2,470). Finally, a total of 5,198 participants were included for the analyses. These participants included 4,989 non-glaucomatous subjects and 209 subjects with OAG with normal IOP. Based on IOP level, the OAG with normal IOP group was divided into low-teen (n = 136) and high-teen (n = 73) OAG groups. The demographic characteristics according to the glaucoma diagnosis are summarized in Table 1. OAG with normal IOP subjects were older (P < 0.001), predominantly male (P = 0.009), less educated (P = 0.043), had a higher proportion of having ever smoked (P = 0.035), had a higher proportion of having hypertension (P < 0.001), and had higher levels of IOP (P = 0.044) than those without the disease.

Table 1. Demographics and general health characteristics of the normal and open-angle glaucoma (OAG) with normal intraocular pressure (IOP) populations.

Parameter Normal (n = 4,989) OAG with normal IOP (n = 209) P
Low-teen OAG (n = 136) High-teen OAG (n = 73)
Demographics
      Age groups <0.001*
        19–29 10.0 (0.4) 2.9 (1.3)* 5.0 (2.2)* 0 (0)*
        30–39 11.0 (0.4) 9.5 (2.3) 8.0 (2.8) 11.8 (4.3)
        40–49 33.6 (0.7) 24.9 (3.8) 17.8 (4.0) 35.3 (7.0)
        50–59 25.0 (0.6) 26.7 (3.6) 29.1 (4.8) 23.1 (5.8)
        60–69 11.6 (0.4) 15.1 (2.4) 16.8 (3.2) 12.6 (4.0)
        ≥70 8.8 (0.8) 20.9 (4.9) 23.3 (6.5) 17.2 (7.0)
      Female, % 51.9 (0.6) 39.2 (4.6)* 40.3 (6.0)* 34.9 (7.5)* 0.009*
Area of residence, % 0.540
      Urban region 68.0 (1.0) 70.8 (4.4) 64.6 (5.7) 79.7 (5.6)
      Rural region 32.0 (1.0) 29.2 (4.4) 35.4 (5.7) 20.3 (5.6)
Education, % 0.043*
      ≤Elementary school 22.1 (0.7) 30.9 (4.7)* 34.7 (6.4) 25.6 (7.1)
      Middle school graduate 13.1 (0.6) 14.0 (3.0) 12.8 (3.8) 15.8 (4.8)
      High school graduate 39.0 (0.9) 29.8 (3.9) 29.5 (5.0) 30.3 (6.8)
      ≥College graduate 25.8 (0.8) 25.2 (3.5) 23.0 (4.2) 28.3 (5.8)
Occupation, % 0.273
      White collar 35.6 (0.8) 30.0 (3.9) 29.1 (5.0)* 31.3 (6.5)
      Blue collar 30.6 (0.9) 29.8 (4.1) 23.2 (4.6) 39.1 (7.1)
      Inoccupation 33.8 (0.9) 40.2 (4.7) 47.7 (6.1) 29.6 (7.3)
Income, % 0.369
      Quartile 1 25.9 (0.8) 25.5 (3.9) 25.1 (5.2) 26.1 (6.3)
      Quartile 2 26.0 (0.8) 19.4 (3.6) 14.9 (3.3) 25.8 (6.9)
      Quartile 3 25.1 (0.8) 28.2 (4.5) 28.1 (6.0) 28.2 (6.3)
      Quartile 4 22.9 (0.8) 27.0 (3.9) 31.9 (5.4) 19.9 (5.7)
Smoking status, % 0.035*
      Ever 44.8 (0.8) 55.3 (4.9)* 54.5 (6.0) 56.5 (7.6)
      Never 55.2 (0.8) 44.7 (4.9) 45.5 (5.7) 43.5 (7.6)
Exercise days per week, % 0.308
      0 63.7 (0.9) 68.1 (4.3) 70.7 (5.0) 64.3 (6.9)
      1 11.0 (0.6) 10.3 (2.8) 8.9 (3.5) 12.4 (4.5)
      2 7.8 (0.5) 7.9 (2.3) 7.1 (2.5) 9.1 (4.1)
      3 7.2 (0.5) 4.1 (1.5) 6.2 (2.3) 1.1 (0.9)
      ≥4 10.3 (0.5) 9.5 (2.5) 7.1 (2.8) 13.1 (4.7)
BMI, % 0.415
      <25 kg/m2 69.0 (0.7) 72.7 (4.2) 71.2 (5.6) 72.2 (5.2)
      ≥25 kg/m2 31.0 (0.7) 28.1 (3.4) 28.3 (4.6) 27.8 (5.2)
Medical comorbidities, %
      Diabetes mellitus 7.5 (0.5) 10.4 (2.9) 12.6 (4.0) 7.2 (3.9) 0.263
      Hypertension 18.6 (0.7) 34.5 (4.3)* 38.9 (6.1)* 28.1 (6.1) <0.001*
      Hyperlipidemia 14.0 (0.6) 17.5 (3.4) 16.6 (4.2) 18.8 (5.7) 0.275
      Anemia 8.1 (0.5) 13.6 (4.0) 11.2 (4.6) 17.1 (7.2) 0.090
Laboratory tests
      Fasting glucose, mg/dL 96.9 (0.3) 98.3 (1.9) 97.1 (1.9) 100.1 (3.8) 0.459
      Ferritin, ng/mL 89.5 (1.9) 126.0 (26.3) 147.6 (43.5) 94.5 (9.4) 0.165
      Aspartate aminotransferase, U/L 22.8 (0.2) 24.7 (1.6) 25.8 (2.4) 23.1 (1.3) 0.067
      Alanine transaminase, U/L 22.6 (0.3) 23.1 (1.3) 23.5 (1.6) 22.6 (1.9) 0.681
Refractive status 0.053
      Emmetropia 54.5 (0.9) 43.9 (4.7) 47.2 (5.9) 39.1 (7.1)*
      Myopia
        Mild 21.8 (0.7) 19.0 (3.3) 16.5 (3.9) 22.7 (6.0)
        Moderate 8.4 (0.5) 15.0 (3.1) 13.0 (3.3) 17.9 (5.1)
        Severe 4.5 (0.4) 7.8 (2.1) 5.2 (2.1) 11.6 (4.4)
      Hyperopia 10.8 (0.6) 14.3 (3.2) 18.1 (4.6) 8.7 (4.3)
Family history of glaucoma 1.8 (0.2) 2.0 (1.1) 2.1 (1.5) 1.8 (1.8) 0.846
IOP, mmHg 13.8 (0.1) 14.6 (0.3)* 12.4 (0.2)* 17.7 (0.3)* 0.044*

All data are expressed as weighted means or weighted frequency with standard error (SE).

IOP, intraocular pressure; OAG, open-angle glaucoma; BMI, body mass index.

*P < 0.05 versus the normal control group.

P value between normal and OAG with normal IOP group. Rao-Scott χ2 (for categorical variables) or analysis of variance (ANOVA) (for continuous variables) tests were used.

Table 2 shows different demographic characteristics according to gender. Only age group and presence of hypertension were significantly associated with OAG with normal IOP in both men (P = 0.016 and P < 0.001, respectively) and women (P < 0.001 and P = 0.022, respectively).

Table 2. Demographics and general health characteristics of normal and OAG with the normal IOP population by gender.

Parameter Men (n = 2,573) Women (n = 2,625)
Normal (n = 2,440) OAG with normal IOP (n = 133) P Normal (n = 2,549)(n = 2,549) OAG with normal IOP (n = 76) P
Demographics
    Age groups 0.016* <0.001*
      19–29 10.7 (0.6) 3.8 (2.1)* 9.3 (0.5) 1.7 (1.0)
      30–39 11.5 (0.6) 7.6 (2.6) 10.5 (0.5) 12.5 (4.5)
      40–49 35.0 (0.9) 32.9 (5.3) 32.3 (0.9) 12.4 (4.2)
      50–59 24.8 (0.8) 30.6 (4.6) 25.2 (0.8) 20.7 (5.9)
      60–69 11.4 (0.6) 14.3 (3.0) 11.8 (0.6) 16.3 (4.3)
      ≥70 6.6 (0.8) 10.9 (3.8) 11.0 (1.2) 36.3 (9.3)
Area of residence, % 0.110 0.472
    Urban region 67.4 (1.2) 75.9 (4.7) 68.4 (1.2) 62.9 (7.9)
    Rural region 32.6 (1.2) 24.1 (4.7) 31.6 (1.2) 37.1 (7.9)
Occupation, % 0.991 0.001*
    White collar 39.9 (1.2) 39.3 (5.1) 31.7 (1.1) 15.9 (5.4)
    Blue collar 40.5 (1.3) 41.2 (5.4) 21.4 (1.2) 12.3 (4.2)
    Inoccupation 19.6 (1.0) 19.5 (4.5) 46.9 (1.3) 71.8 (6.8)
Education, % 0.791 <0.001*
    ≤Elementary school 14.2 (0.9) 11.7 (3.4) 29.5 (1.2) 60.3 (7.7)*
    Middle school graduate 12.5 (0.8) 15.6 (4.1) 13.6 (0.8) 11.6 (4.1)
    High school graduate 41.5 (1.2) 41.5 (5.2) 36.6 (1.2) 12.0 (3.9)
    ≥College graduate 31.8 (1.2) 31.2 (4.3) 20.3 (0.9) 16.0 (5.3)
Smoking status, % 0.473 0.667
    Ever 82.5 (0.9) 85.6 (3.9) 9.7 (0.8) 7.8 (4.0)
    Never 17.5 (0.8) 14.4 (3.9) 90.3 (0.8) 92.2 (4.0)
Medical comorbidities, %
    Hypertension 17.4 (0.9) 33.4 (4.9)* <0.001 19.7 (1.1) 36.2 (8.4)* 0.022*
Family history of glaucoma 1.9 (0.3) 1.4 (1.3) 0.763 1.65 (0.3) 2.84 (2.1) 0.475
IOP, mmHg 14.1 (0.1) 14.7 (0.4) 0.132 13.7 (0.07) 14.4 (0.6) 0.282

All data are expressed as weighted means or weighted frequency with SE.

OAG, open-angle glaucoma; IOP, intraocular pressure.

*P < 0.05 versus the normal control group.

Rao-Scott χ2 (for categorical variables) or ANOVA (for continuous variables) tests were used.

When the geometric means of blood lead, mercury, and cadmium concentrations adjusted for age group, sex, region of residence, occupation, education level, smoking status, hypertension, family history of glaucoma, and intraocular pressure.were compared between the non-glaucomatous and OAG with normal IOP groups, non-significant differences were noted for all three heavy metal levels (P = 0.671, P = 0.237, and P = 0.074, respectively; Table 3). When the OAG with normal IOP group was divided into low-teen and high-teen OAG groups, only the blood cadmium level was significantly higher in subjects with low-teen OAG than in the non-glaucomatous group (P = 0.028), whereas no significant differences in any of the three heavy metal levels were observed in the high-teen OAG group. In men, the significant difference between the normal and OAG with normal IOP groups was only observed for blood cadmium levels (P = 0.014), and the significant difference was also observed for low-teen OAG in subgroup analysis (P = 0.014). In women, on the other hand, the difference was not significant for all three heavy metals.

Table 3. Blood heavy metal concentrations in study subjects according to glaucoma diagnosis adjusted for confounding factors.

Heavy metal Normal OAG with normal IOP P
Low-teen OAG High-teen OAG
Total n = 4,989 n = 209 n = 136 n = 73
  Lead (μg/dL) 2.32 (2.28–2.35) 2.28 (2.13–2.44) 2.38 (2.18–2.60) 2.13 (1.92–2.37) 0.671
  Mercury (μg/L) 4.10 (4.00–4.20) 3.79 (3.34–4.30) 3.96 (3.33–4.71) 3.54 (2.97–4.22) 0.237
  Cadmium (μg/dL) 1.05 (1.03–1.07) 1.15 (1.04–1.27) 1.18 (1.06–1.30)* 1.11 (0.92–1.33) 0.074
Men n = 2,440 n = 133 n = 79 n = 54
  Lead (μg/dL) 2.75 (2.70–2.80) 2.69 (2.52–2.87) 2.78 (2.60–2.97) 2.57 (2.28–2.91) 0.501
  Mercury (μg/L) 4.99 (4.83–5.14) 5.03 (4.47–5.66) 5.41 (4.52–6.47) 4.58 (3.90–5.39) 0.891
  Cadmium (μg/dL) 0.94 (0.92–0.97) 1.10 (0.97–1.25)* 1.12 (0.98–1.28)* 1.07 (0.87–1.33) 0.014*
Women n = 2,549 n = 76 n = 57 n = 19
  Lead (μg/dL) 1.97 (1.93–2.00) 1.96 (1.71–2.25) 2.10 (1.75–2.51) 1.72 (1.43–2.06) 0.940
  Mercury (μg/L) 3.39 (3.29–3.51) 2.75 (2.16–3.48) 2.81 (2.07–3.83) 2.58 (1.80–3.73) 0.078
  Cadmium (μg/dL) 1.16 (1.13–1.19) 1.17 (1.01–1.34) 1.20 (1.04–1.38) 1.10 (0.81–1.49) 0.931

IOP, intraocular pressure; OAG, open-angle glaucoma.

Expressed as geometric mean (95% CI).

*P<0.05 compared to normal control group.

P value between normal and OAG with normal IOP group.

Adjusted for age group, sex, region of residence, occupation, education level, smoking status, hypertension, family history of glaucoma, and intraocular pressure.

The associations between the log-transformed levels of the three heavy metals and prevalence of OAG with normal IOP from multiple logistic regression analyses are shown in Table 4. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, lead and mercury did not show any significant associations with OAG with normal IOP (P = 0.701 and P = 0.239, respectively), as well as low-teen (P = 0.517 and P = 0.769, respectively) and high-teen OAG (P = 0.157 and P = 0.073, respectively). In contrast, log-transformed cadmium levels were positively associated only with prevalence of low-teen OAG (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.03–1.93; P = 0.026), while not showing any significant association with OAG with normal IOP (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.97–1.83; P = 0.073) or high-teen OAG (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.67–2.00; P = 0.592).

Table 4. Odds ratios (ORs) for the prevalence of glaucoma according to log-transformed blood lead, mercury, and cadmium levels.

Lead Mercury Cadmium
OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
OAG with normal IOP
  Model 1 1.25 0.91, 1.74 0.174 0.92 0.69, 1.21 0.536 1.37 1.07, 1.75 0.012*
  Model 2 0.93 0.66, 1.33 0.696 0.86 0.67, 1.11 0.236 1.30 0.96, 1.76 0.085
  Model 3§ 0.93 0.65, 1.34 0.701 0.86 0.66, 1.11 0.239 1.33 0.97, 1.83 0.073
Low-teen OAG
  Model 1 1.41 0.94, 2.11 0.097 0.95 0.65, 1.37 0.768 1.64 1.31, 2.05 0.001*
  Model 2 1.12 0.72, 1.76 0.616 0.93 0.67, 1.29 0.666 1.45 1.06, 1.97 0.018*
  Model 3§ 1.16 0.74, 1.83 0.517 0.95 0.67, 1.35 0.769 1.41 1.03, 1.93 0.026*
High-teen OAG
  Model 1 1.06 0.63, 1.78 0.831 0.87 0.55, 1.38 0.549 1.37 0.96, 1.97 0.391
  Model 2 0.70 0.41, 1.20 0.192 0.76 0.52, 1.11 0.156 1.12 0.67, 1.87 0.667
  Model 3§ 0.65 0.36, 1.18 0.157 0.74 0.53, 1.03 0.073 1.16 0.67, 2.00 0.592

IOP, intraocular pressure; OAG, open-angle glaucoma; CI, confidence interval.

*P < 0.05.

Model 1: crude OR.

Model 2: adjusted for age group and sex.

§Model 3: adjusted for age group, sex, region of residence, occupation, education level, smoking status, hypertension, family history of glaucoma, and IOP.

Next, we investigated gender differences in the association between prevalence of OAG with normal IOP and the log-transformed blood cadmium levels. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that only log-transformed cadmium levels were positively associated with OAG with normal IOP in fully adjusted model (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.11–2.34; P = 0.013) in men, whereas we did not find a significant relationship between blood levels of any of the three heavy metals and OAG with normal IOP in women (Table 5). Similar results were observed in the subtype analyses with low-teen OAG, where positive association with only log-transformed cadmium levels was observed (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.10–2.48; P = 0.016) in men, while no significant association was found in women for all three heavy metals. In contrast, high-teen OAG did not show significant associations with log-transformed heavy metal levels in either sex.

Table 5. Gender differences in ORs for a glaucoma diagnosis according to log-transformed blood lead, mercury, and cadmium levels.

Lead Mercury Cadmium
OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
Men
OAG with normal IOP
  Model 1 1.06 0.75, 1.51 0.750 1.05 0.83, 1.32 0.689 1.68 1.24, 2.26 0.001*
  Model 2 0.91 0.63, 1.32 0.619 1.04 0.83, 1.30 0.764 1.55 1.12, 2.16 0.009*
  Model 3§ 0.87 0.59, 1.29 0.493 1.03 0.81, 1.30 0.842 1.61 1.11, 2.34 0.013*
Low-teen OAG
  Model 1 1.15 0.79, 1.68 0.456 1.10 0.79, 1.54 0.584 1.71 1.19, 2.47 0.004*
  Model 2 1.10 0.69, 1.48 0.962 1.16 0.81, 1.53 0.497 1.61 1.10, 2.34 0.014*
  Model 3§ 1.00 0.65, 1.54 0.988 1.19 0.84, 1.70 0.323 1.65 1.10, 2.48 0.016*
High-teen OAG
  Model 1 0.95 0.50, 1.79 0.862 0.98 0.73, 1.32 0.917 1.64 0.99, 2.71 0.056
  Model 2 0.80 0.41, 1.57 0.511 0.93 0.68, 1.27 0.650 1.49 0.83, 2.66 0.179
  Model 3§ 0.66 0.29, 1.50 0.325 0.87 0.61, 1.24 0.442 1.41 0.84, 2.38 0.194
Women
OAG with normal IOP
  Model 1 1.10 0.57, 2.09 0.783 0.58 0.33, 1.04 0.067 1.19 0.80, 1.75 0.391
  Model 2 0.98 0.52, 1.87 0.952 0.62 0.35, 1.11 0.107 0.97 0.58, 1.62 0.913
  Model 3§ 0.99 0.53, 1.84 0.970 0.63 0.37, 1.08 0.091 1.00 0.60, 1.65 0.991
Low-teen OAG
  Model 1 1.49 0.62, 3.55 0.373 0.56 0.25, 1.26 0.162 1.47 0.98, 2.19 0.060
  Model 2 1.32 0.55, 3.20 0.533 0.67 0.32, 1.38 0.279 1.20 0.72, 2.00 0.479
  Model 3§ 1.44 0.67, 3.08 0.353 0.64 0.31, 1.32 0.225 1.10 0.66, 1.85 0.709
High-teen OAG
  Model 1 0.65 0.29, 1.45 0.289 0.36 0.12, 1.12 0.080 0.85 0.45, 1.61 0.621
  Model 2 0.57 0.26, 1.25 0.161 0.42 0.16, 1.12 0.084 0.68 0.27, 1.72 0.412
  Model 3§ 0.62 0.23, 1.07 0.078 0.66 0.32, 1.39 0.276 1.07 0.47, 2.43 0.877

IOP, intraocular pressure; OAG, open-angle glaucoma; CI, confidence interval.

*P < 0.05.

Model 1: crude OR.

Model 2: adjusted for age group.

§Model 3: adjusted for age group, region of residence, occupation, education level, smoking status, hypertension, family history of glaucoma, and IOP.

Discussion

This study investigated the association between three well-known toxic heavy metals (lead, mercury, and cadmium) and the prevalence of OAG with normal IOP, low-teen OAG, and high-teen OAG. We found that blood cadmium levels were associated with low-teen OAG, while no associations were found for lead or mercury. In addition, we found gender differences in the association between heavy metals and OAG with normal baseline IOP, in which the positive association was shown for men but not for women.

Cadmium is a non-essential, highly toxic metabolic element that can be found naturally in the surrounding environment. Due to rapid industrialization, there is an increasing risk of cadmium exposure from occupational and environmental sources, mainly through dietary intake or inhalation of polluted air. Cadmium toxicity in the human body has been widely investigated. It can act as an inflammatory agent, causing oxidative stress to cells, such as neurons, retinal cells, renal tubules, and vascular endothelial cells [36, 37]. Moreover, the vascular system is a critical target of cadmium toxicity, in which cadmium causes vascular remodeling and stiffening [3739], leading to an increased risk of various systemic vascular diseases, including atherosclerosis [40], myocardial infarction [18], peripheral arterial diseases [41], and hypertension [11].

In this study, blood cadmium levels were positively associated with prevalence of low-teen OAG, but not whole OAG with normal IOP or high-teen OAG, after adjusting for age group, sex, region of residence, occupation, education level, smoking status, hypertension, and intraocular pressure. The results from previous studies have indicated that different mechanisms may exist among NTG patients, and non-pressure factors might contribute to glaucoma development, especially in low-teen OAG subjects. In particular, recent studies suggested that vascular factors may play a more significant role in low-teen OAG by demonstrating more central retinal nerve fiber layer defect patterns [6], more close relationship with disc hemorrhage in progression [9], and less frequency of simultaneous venous pulsation observed in subjects with low-teen OAG when compared to those with high-teen OAG [8]. More recently, using KNHANES data, we demonstrated that low-teen OAG subjects were more closely associated with hypertension, especially those taking antihypertensive medicine [42]. Based on previous studies and the results of this study, we suggest that cadmium might influence the development of NTG via its vascular toxicity, particularly in patients with low baseline IOP. Another possible mechanism that could contribute to glaucomatous damage is direct toxicity to retinal ganglion cells, since a relationship between cadmium and neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, has been identified [19]. However, there is still minimal evidence to support that cadmium has causative effect on the development of glaucomatous optic nerve damage, and further investigations are needed to reveal the exact toxic mechanism of cadmium.

In general, women are known to have higher cadmium levels than men under similar exposure conditions due to the higher prevalence of iron deficiency and hormonal effects after menopause [34]. However, regarding the association between cadmium and OAG, higher cadmium levels were significantly associated with the prevalence of whole OAG with normal IOP and low-teen OAG only in men, not in women. Although no previous studies have demonstrated differential effects of cadmium on glaucomatous optic neuropathy by gender, several lines of evidence suggest that cadmium toxicity might differ between men and women. Consistent with our findings, using data from KNHANES, previous studies demonstrated that high blood cadmium levels were associated with AMD prevalence [20], metabolic syndrome [16], and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [43] only in Korean men. Such gender difference may be partly explained by different exposure routes of cadmium in men and women. Occupational exposure, such as the metal and mining industry, transportation, and repair services, could be important for men, whereas cadmium ingestion from dietary sources could be the main exposure route for women [44]. These differences in exposure sources could result in different effective doses, since the percentage of cadmium absorption through the respiratory tract is 10–50%, approximately twice that of the gastrointestinal tract (5–20%) [44]. In addition, different metabolic pathways of respiratory and dietary exposure could influence the severity of toxicity in body tissues. Smoking, which was significantly higher in men, might also affect the gender difference. However, in this study, the difference persisted even after adjusting for smoking status, indicating that smoking does not explain the gender difference.

Although no significant associations between blood levels of lead or mercury and glaucoma prevalence were found in the current study, toxicity from exposure to lead and mercury has been demonstrated in many studies. Especially, lead has been suggested as an associated factor for glaucoma. Yuki et al. [28] demonstrated that hair lead levels were significantly higher in women with OAG with low-teen baseline IOP compared with the normal control, while Ekinci et al. [29] reported that chronic occupational exposure of lead might lead to decreased retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Moreover, mercury is a highly toxic metallic element, and several studies have revealed toxic effects on eye and visual function. In vivo studies showed retinal toxicity of mercury [45, 46], especially to the photoreceptor layer, and other clinical studies reported visual dysfunction caused by mercury intoxication [47, 48].

Recently, Lin et al. [49] published a paper regarding the association between trace heavy metal levels and glaucoma prevalence using data from KNHANES 2008 and 2009. They revealed that blood manganese levels were negatively associated with glaucoma prevalence, while mercury had a marginally significant association with glaucoma. Conversely, we did not observe an association between blood mercury and prevalence of OAG with normal IOP. One possible reason for such discordant results is that we used log-transformed blood heavy metal levels because of the skewed distribution, while the previous study used the raw blood heavy metal level data for the analyses. Another possible reason is that the inclusion and exclusion criteria were different and the KNHANES data included for the analyses differed. These factors may have influenced the statistical analyses, leading to inconsistent results between the studies.

Several limitations should be considered when interpreting the results of this study. First, the baseline IOP measurement was performed only once, which might not have been sufficient to accurately evaluate the IOP level of each participant and define the glaucoma type. Therefore, we used term ‘OAG with normal IOP’ instead of using NTG in this study. However, most of the OAG patients with normal IOP levels in this study may be representative of NTG patients since large number of subjects was included for the analyses. Second, heavy metal exposure was evaluated using only blood samples, not bone or soft tissue samples. As a result, the measurements might not accurately reflect chronic exposure. However, it is generally accepted that blood concentrations of heavy metals can reflect daily exposure status and can be used as an indicator of the body burden of heavy metals from low environmental exposure [50]. Third, a causal relationship between heavy metal levels and OAG cannot be identified from the results of this study because of the cross-sectional study design. Further experimental and clinical studies are necessary to demonstrate the specific association. Fourth, the size of the groups, normal and OAG with normal IOP, were uneuqual, and only a subpopulation of participants underwent blood heavy metal level investigations, which may cause statistical bias. In addition, onset and duration of glaucoma suffering is not provided in the survey, which may be another important confounding factor. These limitations should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results of our study.

Overall, the results from this study suggest that higher blood cadmium levels may be associated with low-teen OAG, especially in men. Still, differences in associations with heavy metals for each OAG group hinder us to make definite conclusion on causal links between heavy metals and OAG. Future investigations are warranted to reveal and confirm the exact toxic mechanism how heavy metals affect the development of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Regardless, our results further add to the previous idea that non-pressure factors may be more contributable to the pathogenesis of low-teen OAG than to that of high-teen OAG.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. SAS codes for statistical analyses.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Distribution of blood heavy metals among study subjects.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the World Class 300 Project (10031270) of the SMBA, Republic of Korea. The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the World Class 300 Project (10031270) of the SMBA, Republic of Korea. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2004;82(11):844–51. Epub 2005/01/11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim CS, Seong GJ, Lee NH, Song KC. Prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in central South Korea the Namil study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(6):1024–30. Epub 2011/01/29. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, Yamamoto T, Abe H, Shirato S, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1641–8. Epub 2004/09/08. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.029 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yamamoto S, Sawaguchi S, Iwase A, Yamamoto T, Abe H, Tomita G, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma in a population associated with high prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma: the Kumejima Study. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(8):1558–65. Epub 2014/04/22. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.03.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yamagami J, Shirato S, Araie M. [The influence of the intraocular pressure on the visual field of low tension glaucoma]. Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi. 1990;94(5):514–8. Epub 1990/05/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim DM, Seo JH, Kim SH, Hwang SS. Comparison of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects between a low-teen intraocular pressure group and a high-teen intraocular pressure group in normal-tension glaucoma patients. Journal of glaucoma. 2007;16(3):293–6. Epub 2007/04/18. 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31803bda3d . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kim JH, Lee TY, Lee JW, Lee KW. Comparison of the thickness of the lamina cribrosa and vascular factors in early normal-tension glaucoma with low and high intraocular pressures. Korean journal of ophthalmology: KJO. 2014;28(6):473–8. Epub 2014/12/02. 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.6.473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Seo JH, Kim TW, Weinreb RN, Kim YA, Kim M. Relationship of intraocular pressure and frequency of spontaneous retinal venous pulsation in primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(11):2254–60. Epub 2012/09/18. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee J, Kong M, Kim J, Kee C. Comparison of visual field progression between relatively low and high intraocular pressure groups in normal tension glaucoma patients. Journal of glaucoma. 2014;23(8):553–60. Epub 2013/06/12. 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829484c6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tellez-Plaza M, Navas-Acien A, Crainiceanu CM, Guallar E. Cadmium exposure and hypertension in the 1999–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Environmental health perspectives. 2008;116(1):51–6. Epub 2008/01/17. 10.1289/ehp.10764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee BK, Kim Y. Association of blood cadmium with hypertension in the Korean general population: analysis of the 2008–2010 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. American journal of industrial medicine. 2012;55(11):1060–7. Epub 2012/06/14. 10.1002/ajim.22078 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen X, Wang Z, Zhu G, Liang Y, Jin T. Benchmark dose estimation of cadmium reference level for hypertension in a Chinese population. Environmental toxicology and pharmacology. 2015;39(1):208–12. Epub 2014/12/22. 10.1016/j.etap.2014.11.026 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rana SV. Perspectives in endocrine toxicity of heavy metals—a review. Biological trace element research. 2014;160(1):1–14. Epub 2014/06/06. 10.1007/s12011-014-0023-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Feng W, Cui X, Liu B, Liu C, Xiao Y, Lu W, et al. Association of urinary metal profiles with altered glucose levels and diabetes risk: a population-based study in China. PloS one. 2015;10(4):e0123742 Epub 2015/04/16. 10.1371/journal.pone.0123742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rhee SY, Hwang YC, Woo JT, Sinn DH, Chin SO, Chon S, et al. Blood lead is significantly associated with metabolic syndrome in Korean adults: an analysis based on the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 2008. Cardiovascular diabetology. 2013;12:9 Epub 2013/01/11. 10.1186/1475-2840-12-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee BK, Kim Y. Blood cadmium, mercury, and lead and metabolic syndrome in South Korea: 2005–2010 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. American journal of industrial medicine. 2013;56(6):682–92. Epub 2012/08/23. 10.1002/ajim.22107 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Alissa EM, Ferns GA. Heavy metal poisoning and cardiovascular disease. Journal of toxicology. 2011;2011:870125 Epub 2011/09/14. 10.1155/2011/870125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Everett CJ, Frithsen IL. Association of urinary cadmium and myocardial infarction. Environmental research. 2008;106(2):284–6. Epub 2007/12/07. 10.1016/j.envres.2007.10.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chin-Chan M, Navarro-Yepes J, Quintanilla-Vega B. Environmental pollutants as risk factors for neurodegenerative disorders: Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience. 2015;9:124 Epub 2015/04/29. 10.3389/fncel.2015.00124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim EC, Cho E, Jee D. Association between blood cadmium level and age-related macular degeneration in a representative Korean population. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2014;55(9):5702–10. Epub 2014/08/16. 10.1167/iovs.14-14774 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Park SJ, Lee JH, Woo SJ, Kang SW, Park KH. Five heavy metallic elements and age-related macular degeneration: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2008–2011. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(1):129–37. Epub 2014/09/17. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.039 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mosad SM, Ghanem AA, El-Fallal HM, El-Kannishy AM, El Baiomy AA, Al-Diasty AM, et al. Lens cadmium, lead, and serum vitamins C, E, and beta carotene in cataractous smoking patients. Current eye research. 2010;35(1):23–30. Epub 2009/12/22. 10.3109/02713680903362880 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kalariya NM, Nair B, Kalariya DK, Wills NK, van Kuijk FJ. Cadmium-induced induction of cell death in human lens epithelial cells: implications to smoking associated cataractogenesis. Toxicology letters. 2010;198(1):56–62. Epub 2010/05/04. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.04.021 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Neal RE, Lin C, Isom R, Vaishnav K, Zigler JS Jr. Opacification of lenses cultured in the presence of Pb. Molecular vision. 2010;16:2137–45. Epub 2010/12/09. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Panteli VS, Kanellopoulou DG, Gartaganis SP, Koutsoukos PG. Application of anodic stripping voltammetry for zinc, copper, and cadmium quantification in the aqueous humor: implications of pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Biological trace element research. 2009;132(1–3):9–18. Epub 2009/04/28. 10.1007/s12011-009-8380-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yildirim Z, Ucgun NI, Kilic N, Gursel E, Sepici-Dincel A. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome and trace elements. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2007;1100:207–12. Epub 2007/04/27. 10.1196/annals.1395.020 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ceylan OM, Can Demirdogen B, Mumcuoglu T, Aykut O. Evaluation of essential and toxic trace elements in pseudoexfoliation syndrome and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Biological trace element research. 2013;153(1–3):28–34. Epub 2013/03/21. 10.1007/s12011-013-9644-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yuki K, Dogru M, Imamura Y, Kimura I, Ohtake Y, Tsubota K. Lead accumulation as possible risk factor for primary open-angle glaucoma. Biological trace element research. 2009;132(1–3):1–8. Epub 2009/04/25. 10.1007/s12011-009-8376-z . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ekinci M, Ceylan E, Cagatay HH, Keles S, Altinkaynak H, Kartal B, et al. Occupational exposure to lead decreases macular, choroidal, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in industrial battery workers. Current eye research. 2014;39(8):853–8. Epub 2014/02/08. 10.3109/02713683.2013.877934 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Demir N, Akkoyunlu G, Yargicoglu P, Agar A, Tanriover G, Demir R. Fiber structure of optic nerve in cadmium-exposed diabetic rats: an ultrastructural study. The International journal of neuroscience. 2003;113(3):323–37. Epub 2003/06/14. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rai NK, Ashok A, Rai A, Tripathi S, Nagar GK, Mitra K, et al. Exposure to As, Cd and Pb-mixture impairs myelin and axon development in rat brain, optic nerve and retina. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 2013;273(2):242–58. Epub 2013/05/18. 10.1016/j.taap.2013.05.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vahter M, Berglund M, Akesson A, Liden C. Metals and women's health. Environmental research. 2002;88(3):145–55. Epub 2002/06/08. 10.1006/enrs.2002.4338 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Myong JP, Kim HR, Baker D, Choi B. Blood cadmium and moderate-to-severe glomerular dysfunction in Korean adults: analysis of KNHANES 2005–2008 data. International archives of occupational and environmental health. 2012;85(8):885–93. Epub 2012/01/19. 10.1007/s00420-012-0737-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee BK, Kim Y. Sex-specific Profiles of Blood Metal Levels Associated with Metal-Iron Interactions. Safety and health at work. 2014;5(3):113–7. Epub 2014/11/08. 10.1016/j.shaw.2014.06.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kweon S, Kim Y, Jang MJ, Kim K, Choi S, Chun C, et al. Data resource profile: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). International journal of epidemiology. 2014;43(1):69–77. Epub 2014/03/04. 10.1093/ije/dyt228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bertin G, Averbeck D. Cadmium: cellular effects, modifications of biomolecules, modulation of DNA repair and genotoxic consequences (a review). Biochimie. 2006;88(11):1549–59. Epub 2006/10/31. 10.1016/j.biochi.2006.10.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Prozialeck WC, Edwards JR, Woods JM. The vascular endothelium as a target of cadmium toxicity. Life sciences. 2006;79(16):1493–506. Epub 2006/06/13. 10.1016/j.lfs.2006.05.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Prozialeck WC, Edwards JR, Nebert DW, Woods JM, Barchowsky A, Atchison WD. The vascular system as a target of metal toxicity. Toxicological sciences: an official journal of the Society of Toxicology. 2008;102(2):207–18. Epub 2007/10/20. 10.1093/toxsci/kfm263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sangartit W, Kukongviriyapan U, Donpunha W, Pakdeechote P, Kukongviriyapan V, Surawattanawan P, et al. Tetrahydrocurcumin protects against cadmium-induced hypertension, raised arterial stiffness and vascular remodeling in mice. PloS one. 2014;9(12):e114908 Epub 2014/12/17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0114908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Messner B, Knoflach M, Seubert A, Ritsch A, Pfaller K, Henderson B, et al. Cadmium is a novel and independent risk factor for early atherosclerosis mechanisms and in vivo relevance. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2009;29(9):1392–8. Epub 2009/06/27. 10.1161/atvbaha.109.190082 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tellez-Plaza M, Navas-Acien A, Crainiceanu CM, Sharrett AR, Guallar E. Cadmium and peripheral arterial disease: gender differences in the 1999–2004 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. American journal of epidemiology. 2010;172(6):671–81. Epub 2010/08/10. 10.1093/aje/kwq172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee SH, Kwak SW, Kang EM, Kim GA, Lee SY, Bae HW, et al. Estimated Trans-Lamina Cribrosa Pressure Differences in Low-Teen and High-Teen Intraocular Pressure Normal Tension Glaucoma: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PloS one. 2016;11(2):e0148412 Epub 2016/02/04. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Oh CM, Oh IH, Lee JK, Park YH, Choe BK, Yoon TY, et al. Blood cadmium levels are associated with a decline in lung function in males. Environmental research. 2014;132:119–25. Epub 2014/04/29. 10.1016/j.envres.2014.04.008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nordberg GF, Nogawa K, Nordberg M, Friberg LT. Cadmium. In: Nordberg GF, Fowler BA, Nordberg M, Friberg LT, editors. Handbook on the toxicology of metals 2007. p. 445–86.
  • 45.Korbas M, Lai B, Vogt S, Gleber SC, Karunakaran C, Pickering IJ, et al. Methylmercury targets photoreceptor outer segments. ACS chemical biology. 2013;8(10):2256–63. Epub 2013/08/21. 10.1021/cb4004805 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mela M, Cambier S, Mesmer-Dudons N, Legeay A, Grotzner SR, de Oliveira Ribeiro CA, et al. Methylmercury localization in Danio rerio retina after trophic and subchronic exposure: a basis for neurotoxicology. Neurotoxicology. 2010;31(5):448–53. Epub 2010/05/11. 10.1016/j.neuro.2010.04.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.da Costa GM, dos Anjos LM, Souza GS, Gomes BD, Saito CA, Pinheiro Mda C, et al. Mercury toxicity in Amazon gold miners: visual dysfunction assessed by retinal and cortical electrophysiology. Environmental research. 2008;107(1):98–107. Epub 2007/09/25. 10.1016/j.envres.2007.08.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Saint-Amour D, Roy MS, Bastien C, Ayotte P, Dewailly E, Despres C, et al. Alterations of visual evoked potentials in preschool Inuit children exposed to methylmercury and polychlorinated biphenyls from a marine diet. Neurotoxicology. 2006;27(4):567–78. Epub 2006/04/20. 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.02.008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lin SC, Singh K. Association Between Body Levels of Trace Metals and Glaucoma Prevalence. JAMA ophthalmology. 2015;133(10):1144–50. Epub 2015/08/08. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.2438 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jarup L, Berglund M, Elinder CG, Nordberg G, Vahter M. Health effects of cadmium exposure—a review of the literature and a risk estimate. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health. 1998;24 Suppl 1:1–51. Epub 1998/05/07. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. SAS codes for statistical analyses.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Distribution of blood heavy metals among study subjects.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES