Abstract
Cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) systems are important laboratory tools that are used for various synthetic biology applications. Here, we present a simple and inexpensive laboratory-scale method for preparing a CFPS system from E. coli. The procedure uses basic lab equipment, a minimal set of reagents, and requires less than one hour to process the bacterial cell mass into a functional S30-T7 extract. BL21(DE3) and MRE600 E. coli strains were used to prepare the S30-T7 extract. The CFPS system was used to produce a set of fluorescent and therapeutic proteins of different molecular weights (up to 66 kDa). This system was able to produce 40–150 μg-protein/ml, with variations depending on the plasmid type, expressed protein and E. coli strain. Interestingly, the BL21-based CFPS exhibited stability and increased activity at 40 and 45°C. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most rapid and affordable lab-scale protocol for preparing a cell-free protein synthesis system, with high thermal stability and efficacy in producing therapeutic proteins.
Introduction
Proteins have increasing medical, industrial and research importance, owing to their high versatility, bio-specificity and potency [1]. In accordance, there is a growing need for efficient and economical methods for producing proteins [2–4]. Expressing proteins in yeast, bacteria or mammalian cells is usually the first choice; however, for some proteins this is impossible and other expression systems are needed [5]. Protein synthesis in a cell free system can allow the production of toxic proteins, the incorporation of artificial amino acids, and high-throughput screening of proteins [6].
CFPS systems can be prepared from either a cell extract, or from a combination of purified recombinant proteins [7–9]. Currently, CFPS systems based on E. coli extracts, termed ‘S30 extracts’, are most commonly used and studied. The resulting extract contains all the molecular machineries required for coupling transcription-translation processes, while the obtained protein is encoded by the adddition of a DNA template. For protein synthesis to be efficient, energy sources, amino acids, nucleotides and salts are necessary supplements (Fig 1) [10].
Since first introduced by Pratt and cowokers, the ‘S30 extract’ platform has enabled the expression of a variety of proteins, and its composition has been improved over time [7]. Among the proteins produced with CFPS are antibacterial polypeptides and mammalian membrane proteins, which were challenging to produce in whole cell systems [11–13]. In addition, cell-free systems enable to modify the target protein by introducing disulfide bonds, and incorporating non-natural and isotope-labeled amino acids [7, 8, 14–17]. Though E. coli extracts are commercially available, they are expensive and sensitive to shipping conditions and freeze-thaw cycles, hindering wide use in academic and research labs.
Due to lengthy procedures and expensive reagents, there has been an emphasis on reducing the cost of CFPS system preparation by optimizing high-speed centrifugation, dialysis and pre-incubation steps [2, 4, 18]. Here, we present a simple, yet efficient, method to produce thermally-stable S30-T7 CFPS systems.
Materials and Methods
Materials
The DNA template encoding Renilla luciferase was obtained from the S30-T7 high yield protein expression system kit, purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). A Superfolder GFP (sfGFP) template was purchased from Sandia BioTech (Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA). This DNA template was cloned into a pET9a or a pET28a vector using restriction sites NdeI and BamHI. A pET9d plasmid encoding Tyrosinase from Bacillus megaterium was kindly provided by Prof. Ayelet Fishman [19]. Plasmid pVC45 f+t QQΔ vector was used to produce Pseudomonas exotoxin A (PE) [20]. These protein nucleotide sequences are detailed in Appendix A in S1 File.
Preparation of S30-T7 lysate
A detailed protocol for the preparation of the S30-T7 lysate is described in Table 1. Briefly, S30-T7 lysates were prepared from E. coli BL21(DE3) and MRE600 transformed with TargeTron® vector pAR1219 (Sigma-Aldrich, Rehovot, Israel). Bacteria glycerol stocks were streaked on an agar Luria Bertani (LB) plate. A single colony was used to inoculate fresh LB media, and was grown overnight at 37°C with orbital shaking of 250 rpm. This was used as a starter to inoculate fresh Terrific Broth (TB) the following day at a 1:50 starter:medium ratio. The media were sterilized and supplemented with ampicillin at 50 μg/ml. The culture was grown at 37°C to OD600≈1, upon which 0.4 mM 0.2 μm filtered Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) solution was added. The culture was further grown at 37°C until it reached OD600≈4 and was centrifuged at 7,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The pellet was re-suspended in the same volume (1:1 v/v) of cold S30 lysate buffer containing: 10mM Tris-acetate at pH = 7.4, 14mM magnesium acetate, 60 mM potassium acetate, 1 mM 0.2 μm filtered dithiothreitol (DTT) and 0.5 ml/L 2-mercaptoethanol. Subsequently, the suspension was centrifuged again and was resuspended in 15 ml of S30 lysate buffer. Then, the cells were broken by one pass through an emulsiFlex-C3 high pressure homogenizer (Avestin, Mannheim, Germany) that was pre-cooled to 4°C and at a working pressure of 15,000 psi, with an air pressure of 4 bar. One-hundred μl of 0.1 M DTT was added to each 10 ml of homogenized suspension. Finally, the suspension was centrifuged at 24,700 x g or 13,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C divided into aliquots of 200 μl, frozen by liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for further use.
Table 1. Preparation of S30-T7 lysate.
A. Materials and solutions required: | Notes: |
E. coli BL21(DE3) or MRE600 transformed with pAR1219 | |
Ampicillin stock at 50 mg/ml | |
LB agar (1.5%) plate | Should contain ampicillin at 50 μg/ml. |
LB media (20 ml) | Should be prepared and sterilized in advance. Before bacteria inoculation, ampicillin should be added to final concentration of 50 μg/ml. |
TB media (1 liter) | Should be prepared and sterilized in advance. Before bacteria inoculation, ampicillin should be added to final concentration of 50 μg/ml. |
100 mM Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) stock solution | Should be filtered using 0.2 μm filter. |
0.1M dithiothreitol (DTT) stock solution | Should be filtered using 0.2 μm filter. |
S30 lysate buffer (1.5 liters) containing:
|
The S30 lysate buffer was prepared in advance without the addition of DTT and 2-mercaptoethanol, sterilized and stored at 4°C. Prior to use, DTT and 2-mercaptoethanol were added. |
Liquid nitrogen | |
B. Equipment: | Notes: |
Sterilized Erlenmeyer flasks | 2 of 100 ml |
Sterilized Erlenmeyer flasks with baffles | 2 of 2 liters |
Floor incubator shaker | |
Centrifuge | Should enable at least 13,000 x g |
High pressure homogenizer | Should be pre-cooled to 4°C |
-80°C freezer | |
Sterilized 1.5-ml plastic tubes | |
A spectrophotometer | |
Sterilized graduated cylinder | |
Sterilized centrifuge tubes | |
Sterilized pipette tips | |
C. Procedure: | |
|
In vitro protein synthesis using cell-free system based on S30-T7 lysate
A detailed protocol for the in vitro protein synthesis reaction is described in Tables 2 and 3. Briefly, The CFPS reaction mixtures were composed of 55 mM HEPES-KOH (pH = 8), 14 mM magnesium acetate, 50 mM potassium acetate, 155mM ammonium acetate, 3% (w/v) polyethylene glycol, 40 mM D-(−)-3-Phosphoglyceric acid disodium salt, 2.5 mM of each natural amino acid (alanine, arginine, asparagine, aspartic acid, cysteine, glutamine, glutamic acid, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, proline, serine, threonine, tryptophan, tyrosine, valine), 1.2 mM ATP, 1 mM GTP, 0.8 mM UTP, and 10 μg/ml DNA template. The DNA template was transformed to E. coli BL21(DE3), produced and purified using QIAGEN Plasmid mini and maxi kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). In addition, the total protein content of the S30-T7 lysates was measured by Quick Start™ Bradford Protein Assay (BioRad) and set to 22 mg/ml. 30% (v/v) of the S30-T7 lysates were added to the reaction mixture. The reaction volume was completed with DNase-, RNase-free water and incubated at a constant temperature of 37°C (unless mentioned otherwise) for 2 hours with vigorous shaking, 1200 RPM. Reagent cost calculations were based on reagent prices obtained from the 2016 online catalogues of Sigma-Aldrich. Cost of labor was not included.
Table 2. In vitro protein synthesis using cell-free system based on S30-T7 lysate.
A. Materials and solutions required: | Notes: |
1M HEPES-KOH (pH = 8) | |
1M magnesium acetate | |
1M potassium acetate | |
5.2 M ammonium acetate | |
50% (v/v) Polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG) | |
0.5 M 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PGA) | |
50 mM of 17 amino acids | These 17 amino acids are alanine, arginine, asparagine, aspartic acid, cysteine, glutamine, glutamic acid, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, proline, serine, threonine, and valine. |
50 mM of 3 amino acids | These 3 amino acids are tryptophan, phenylalanine, and tyrosine. |
100 mM Adenine triphosphate (ATP) | |
50 mM Guanidine triphosphate (GTP) | |
100 mM Uridine triphosphate (UTP) | |
S30-T7 lysate | Prepared according to Table 1 |
DNase, RNase free H2O | |
B. Equipment: | Notes: |
Floor incubator shaker or a Thermomixer® | |
C. Procedure: | |
|
Table 3. The composition of the CFPS reaction mixture.
Cell-free reaction component | Final concentration in solution |
---|---|
HEPES-KOH (pH = 8) | 55 mM |
Magnesium acetate | 14 mM |
Potassium acetate | 50 mM |
Ammonium acetate | 155 mM |
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) | 3% (v/v) |
3-phosphoglycerate (3-PGA) | 40 mM |
20 amino acids | 2.5 mM |
Adenine triphosphate (ATP) | 1.2 mM |
Guanidine triphosphate (GTP) | 1 mM |
Uridine triphosphate (UTP) | 0.8 mM |
S30-T7 lysate | 30% (v/v) |
DNA template | 10 μg/mL |
DNase, RNase free H2O | to reaction volume |
The CFPS was used to produce Renilla luciferase, TyrBm, sfGFP and PE. Luciferase activity was evaluated by the Promega’s luciferase assay system (Madison, WI, USA); luminescence was determined. TyrBm activity was evaluated by initially precipitating insoluble components and then adding 1 mM L-Dopa and 1 mM Cu+2 to the reaction tubes. After 1 hour of incubation at 37°C, the absorbance was determined at 475 nm using a plate reader. Superfolder GFP in vitro production was carried out by incubating the reaction mixtures for 2 hours in different temperatures in the range of 25–50°C. The protein production amount was evaluated according to the fluorescence levels at excitation wavelength of 488 nm and emission of 530 nm. Purified protein was produced and used to correlate between fluorescence levels and concentration (further detailed in Appendix B in S1 File.).
Cell-free protein synthesis of PE
Western blot analysis was used to verify the in vitro production of PE. Five μl of each reaction were mixed with a SDS-PAGE sample buffer (concentrated ×4) and boiled for 10 min at 95°C. The samples were loaded onto a 12% SDS-PAGE gel. Following electrophoresis, the gels were blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes, blocked with 5% nonfat milk powder and probed for 1 hour at room temperature with anti-PE polyclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted by 1:7000. After extensive washes, the blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit, from goat origin, secondary antibody (GenScript, NJ, USA) diluted to 1:104 and developed with Clarity™ Western ECL Blotting Substrate (BioRad). The results were visualized using ImageQuant Las4000 (GE, Sweden).
PE cytotoxicity assay
The cytotoxicity of PE was determined by a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolinium bromide (MTT) assay as follows: 1×104 cells/well (200 μl) of 4T1 cell-line were seeded in 96-well plates in a RPMI 1640 medium, supplemented with 10% heat inactivated Fetal Bovine Serum (Biological Industries, Beit-Haemek, Israel), 2 mM of L-Glutamine Solution, 10 U/ml of penicillin G sodium salt and 0.01 mg/ml of streptomycin sulfate for 24 hours at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humid atmosphere. Then, the media were replaced with cell-free reactions producing PE or with various concentrations of purified PE. The cells were incubated for 12 hours at 37°C. Growth medium was replaced with fresh media for an additional 24 hours. Finally, the growth medium was vacuum drained and 100 μl/well of 1 mg/ml MTT reagent was added. Following a 2 hours incubation at 37°C, 100 μl/well of the MTT extraction buffer (containing: 10% Triton X-100, 0.1N HCl and isopropanol) were added and incubated overnight at 37°C. Cell viability was calculated from the absorbance values read at 570 nm and 690 nm (blank). The percentage of living cells was calculated with respect to the untreated controls that were processed simultaneously.
Results and Discussion
CFPS systems are used for a variety of synthetic biology applications, including protein evolution and high-throughput screening (Fig 1). To incorporate these systems as routine laboratory techniques, they should be rapid, simple and affordable [4, 21]. Here we present a S30-T7 CFPS system which can be prepared at a laboratory-scale, requiring minimal preparations and materials.
Since first introduced by Pratt [22], S30 system preparation protocols have undergone several modifications (Fig 2). Previous studies investigated the optimization of the reaction itself; incorporating different energy sources or maintaining magnesium concentration during the reaction [3, 13]. Others have focused on the lysate preparation procedure, which is time consuming with high costs, requiring special laboratory equipment [10, 22]. For example, Liu et al. presented a shortened protocol, with reduced cost of the extract preparation by performing an empty runoff procedure (incubation of the lysate in order to degrade endogenous mRNAs, without addition of other components), shortening the dialysis, and cancelling one wash step [2]. Other modifications include the incorporation of endogenous T7 RNA polymerase, or usage of different cell breakage methods including sonication and biochemical disruption [4, 16, 21–24].
S30-T7 lysate preparation
Bacteria cells were used to over-express T7 RNA polymerase. The cells were washed with a S30 lysate buffer, cracked using a high pressure homogenizer, and were further centrifuged. Then, the suspension was frozen by liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for further use. In our new method, only common equipment was used. Specifically, we used a centrifugation force lower then 30,000X g (13,000–24,700Xg), and additional time consuming steps were omitted, such as freezing the cells after harvesting, centrifugation steps, pre-incubation and dialyses. This new protocol requires less than 1 hour of labor from the point the cells have reached the required mass, which is shorter than the procedures mentioned above. For example, Pratt’s system requires more than 7 hours of preparation and Kim et al.s' procedure takes 85 minutes [4, 22].
Reducing reagent cost
Biological processes in cells have been optimized in an evolutionary manner to serve all of the cell's necessities. However, when selecting a single process, such as protein synthesis, it may be further optimized to serve the sole purpose of this specific process, without the limitation and conditions required from other unrelated processes. Accordingly, to further simplify the CFPS system, less ingredients were incorporated into the reaction mixture, as indicated by Ivanir E. [25]. Specifically, 10 instead of 17 ingredient composed the reaction mixture (Table 3): cyclic-AMP, phosphoenol pyruvate, folinic acid and tRNA were omitted [22, 25]. This resulted in a system that costs 80% less compared to Pratt's procedure: 1.1$/50 μl compared to 5$/50 μl at Pratt's protocol [22]. Thus, an affordable system can be easily prepared and applied to produce a variety of proteins.
Using the system to produce enzymes, fluorescent and luminescent proteins
Two enzymes were synthesized using the modified S30-T7 system, based on either BL21(DE3) (deficient in the lon and ompT protease genes) or MRE600 (deficient in ribonuclease I) E. coli strains. The production of the 36 kDa proteins Renilla luciferase (Fig 3A) and TyrBm (Fig 3B) were evaluated according to their enzymatic activity. Both E. coli strains generated similar protein production. The catalytic reaction of TyrBM was also observed, resulting in a darker solution which indicates on melanin formation (Fig 3C). Different E. coli strains were previously used to prepare S30 extracts. Among them are BL21(DE3), Rosetta(DE3), BL21-Star(DE3), A19 and C495 [2, 4, 18]. It was found that different preparation conditions are needed to be implemented when preparing extracts from different strains. However, it seems that in the presented S30-T7 CFPS system, when the in vitro production was carried out at 37°C, there was no difference between lysates originating from BL21 or MRE600. This system was also used for the production of the 27 kDa fluorescent protein, sfGFP (Fig 3D), which can be used as a reporter protein or as a visualization agent [26, 27]. In addition, the reactions were analyzed for the integrity of the produced proteins and for the formation of protein aggregates. It was confirmed that above 95% of the produced protein is the full-length protein however the aggregation propensity is protein dependent (further detailed in Appendixes C, and D and Fig A in S1 File).
Temperature stability
This system was able to produce up to 150 μg/ml, with variations depended on the plasmid type, produced protein, lysate batch and E. coli strain. To ensure quantification of a full and active protein, we measured the fluorescent signal from the produced sfGFP, and correlated it to the protein concentration. In addition, a fluorescence analysis of sfGFP using SDS-PAGE was performed confirming that the fluorescence was obtained from the full length product (further detailed in Appendix E and Fig B in S1 File.). We found that the incubation temperature affects the efficiency of sfGFP production (Fig 3D). While previously described CFPS reactions were incubated at 37°C, common for standard protein producing procedures based on E. coli cells or lysates, we sought to analyze the production of sfGFP in a variety of temperatures. BL21-based CFPS system exhibited higher activity in 40 and 45°C, whereas the maximal activity of the MRE600-based system was at 37 and 40°C. Interestingly, the decay in the activity between 45 and 50°C was more drastic for BL21-based system. These findings support former reports that indicate a variability in the nature of CFPS systems, originating from different E. coli strains due to differences in their genetics [2, 4, 18]. In addition, the high thermo-activity of the presented CFPS system can be implemented in processes which involve high temperatures. For example, if these system are further up-scaled while preserving their properties, they will be less sensitive to transient heat profiles, which may exist in large volume reactors. Another application in the therapeutic field is the production of proteins in an inflammation zone, which is known to involve higher temperature then 37°C [28]. We believe that the increased activity of the bacterial system at temperatures reaching 42°C may be related to the evolutionary survival needs of E. coli at physiological temperatures of infection and inflammation as well as in conditions of bacterial fermentation [29–33].
Producing therapeutic proteins with the new S30-T7 system
Further demonstration of our CFPS system applicability, was the production of PE, a protein on which many immunotoxins are based [34]. This 66 kDa toxin has been widely investigated for its use in cancer therapy [35]. The in vitro production and cytotoxic effect of PE (Fig 4A and 4B) were evaluated. The cell-free reaction resulted in high cytotoxicity on 4T1 cells due to the production of PE. Reactions based on the two lysates did not generate different observations, in compliance with Fig 3A and 3B. The cytotoxicity of a protein produced using a CFPS system against cancer cells has been presented before, however for a lower molecular weight toxic protein (12 kDa) [36]. To our knowledge, this is the first production of a large therapeutic protein using a CFPS system, emphasizing its potential to produce a variety of potent proteins and their incorporation into clinical-related uses.
Conclusions
We present here a quick, inexpensive and simple procedure for lysate preparation and in vitro protein production. This platform was used to synthesize a variety of proteins with molecular weights up to 66 kDa, which possess different functionalities, including cytotoxic activity. The system exhibited improved activity in temperatures higher than 37°C, depending on the bacteria strain, which can be an advantage for different applications.
Development of an affordable, simpler, and more accessible platform can overcome current limitations in protein production and establish a more robust use of CFPS systems, for both research and industry.
Supporting Information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the EU-FP7 Marie Curie Program (No. 333797) - Dr. Avi Schroeder, Israel Science Foundation (No. 1778/13), Israel Cancer Association (No. 20150116), Israel Ministry of Economy (No. 52752), Israel Ministry of Science, Technology and Space (3-11878), GIF (No. 1-2328-1139. 10/20), ERC (2015-STG-680242), Mallat Family Foundation, The Russell Berrie Nanotechnology Institute (RBNI) at the Technion - Dr. Avi Schroeder, The Lorry Lokey Interdisciplinary Center for Life Sciences & Engineering at the Technion - Dr. Avi Schroeder, the Alon Fellowship from the Council For Higher Education and Taub Foundation Fellowships to A.S, and the "Baroness Ariane de Rothschild Women Doctoral Program" from the Rothschild Caesarea Foundation, and The Interdisciplinary Program for Biotechnology at the Technion (Mrs. Nitzan Krinsky). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Pisal DS, Kosloski MP, Balu-Iyer SV. Delivery of therapeutic proteins. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99(6):2557–75. 10.1002/jps.22054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu DV, Zawada JF, Swartz JR. Streamlining Escherichia coli S30 extract preparation for economical cell-free protein synthesis. Biotechnol Progr. 2005;21(2):460–5. 10.1021/bp049789y . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kim TW, Keum JW, Oh IS, Choi CY, Kim HC, Kim DM. An economical and highly productive cell-free protein synthesis system utilizing fructose-1,6-bisphosphate as an energy source. J Biotechnol. 2007;130(4):389–93. WOS:000248693000008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kim TW, Keum JW, Oh IS, Choi CY, Park CG, Kim DM. Simple procedures for the construction of a robust and cost-effective cell-free protein synthesis system. J Biotechnol. 2006;126(4):554–61. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.05.014. WOS:000242651400014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jackson AM, Boutell J, Cooley N, He M. Cell-free protein synthesis for proteomics. Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics. 2004;2(4):308–19. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.He MY, He YZ, Luo Q, Wang MR. From DNA to protein: No living cells required. Process Biochem. 2011;46(3):615–20. 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.11.003. WOS:000288419900001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Carlson ED, Gan R, Hodgman CE, Jewett MC. Cell-free protein synthesis: applications come of age. Biotechnol Adv. 2012;30(5):1185–94. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.09.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rosenblum G, Cooperman BS. Engine out of the chassis: cell-free protein synthesis and its uses. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(2):261–8. 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.10.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shimizu Y, Inoue A, Tomari Y, Suzuki T, Yokogawa T, Nishikawa K, et al. Cell-free translation reconstituted with purified components. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(8):751–5. 10.1038/90802 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nirenberg MW, Matthaei JH. The dependence of cell-free protein synthesis in E. coli upon naturally occurring or synthetic polyribonucleotides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1961;47(10):1588–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Martemyanov KA, Shirokov VA, Kurnasov OV, Gudkov AT, Spirin AS. Cell-free production of biologically active polypeptides: Application to the synthesis of antibacterial peptide cecropin. Protein Expr Purif. 2001;21(3):456–61. 10.1006/prep.2001.1400. WOS:000167881900012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nguyen TA, Lieu SS, Chang G. An Escherichia coli-Based Cell-Free System for Large-Scale Production of Functional Mammalian Membrane Proteins Suitable for X-Ray Crystallography. J Mol Microb Biotech. 2010;18(2):85–91. 10.1159/000283512. WOS:000275967600003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim TW, Kim DM, Choi CY. Rapid production of milligram quantities of proteins in a batch cell-free protein synthesis system. J Biotechnol. 2006;124(2):373–80. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.12.030. WOS:000238882800005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zubay G. In vitro synthesis of protein in microbial systems. Annu Rev Genet. 1973;7:267–87. 10.1146/annurev.ge.07.120173.001411 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kigawa T, Muto Y, Yokoyama S. Cell-free synthesis and amino acid-selective stable isotope labeling of proteins for NMR analysis. J Biomol NMR. 1995;6(2):129–34. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nevin DE, Pratt JM. A coupled in vitro transcription-translation system for the exclusive synthesis of polypeptides expressed from the T7 promoter. FEBS Lett. 1991;291(2):259–63. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Goerke AR, Swartz JR. Development of cell-free protein synthesis platforms for disulfide bonded proteins. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp. 2008;99(2):351–67. 10.1002/bit.21567 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kwon YC, Jewett MC. High-throughput preparation methods of crude extract for robust cell-free protein synthesis. Sci Rep Cetacean Res. 2015;5:8663 10.1038/srep08663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shuster V, Fishman A. Isolation, cloning and characterization of a tyrosinase with improved activity in organic solvents from Bacillus megaterium. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;17(4):188–200. 10.1159/000233506 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Benhar I, Wang Q-c, FitzGerald D, Pastan I. Pseudomonas exotoxin A mutants. Replacement of surface-exposed residues in domain III with cysteine residues that can be modified with polyethylene glycol in a site-specific manner. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(18):13398–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fujiwara K, Doi N. Biochemical Preparation of Cell Extract for Cell-Free Protein Synthesis without Physical Disruption. PloS one. 2016;11(4):e0154614 10.1371/journal.pone.0154614 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pratt JM. Coupled Transcription-Translation in Prokaryotic Cell-Free Systems In: Hames BD, Higgins SJ, editors. Transcription and Translation a practical approach. Washington, DC: IRL Press; 1984. p. 179–209. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shrestha P, Holland TM, Bundy BC. Streamlined extract preparation for Escherichia coli-based cell-free protein synthesis by sonication or bead vortex mixing. BioTechniques. 2012;53(3):163–74. 10.2144/0000113924 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yang WC, Patel KG, Wong HE, Swartz JR. Simplifying and streamlining Escherichia coli-based cell-free protein synthesis. Biotechnology progress. 2012;28(2):413–20. 10.1002/btpr.1509 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ivanir E. Development of an efficient cell-free translation system: Technion—Israel Institute of Technology; 2009.
- 26.Pedelacq JD, Cabantous S, Tran T, Terwilliger TC, Waldo GS. Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein. Nature biotechnology. 2006;24(1):79–88. 10.1038/nbt1172 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gagoski D, Polinkovsky ME, Mureev S, Kunert A, Johnston W, Gambin Y, et al. Performance benchmarking of four cell-free protein expression systems. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113(2):292–300. 10.1002/bit.25814 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fairchild KD, Viscardi RM, Hester L, Singh IS, Hasday JD. Effects of hypothermia and hyperthermia on cytokine production by cultured human mononuclear phagocytes from adults and newborns. Journal of interferon & cytokine research: the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research. 2000;20(12):1049–55. 10.1089/107999000750053708 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hasan CM, Shimizu K. Effect of temperature up-shift on fermentation and metabolic characteristics in view of gene expressions in Escherichia coli. Microbial cell factories. 2008;7:35 10.1186/1475-2859-7-35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bouvet OM, Pernoud S, Grimont PA. Temperature-dependent fermentation of D-sorbitol in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Applied and environmental microbiology. 1999;65(9):4245–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ito K, Wittekind M, Nomura M, Shiba K, Yura T, Miura A, et al. A temperature-sensitive mutant of E. coli exhibiting slow processing of exported proteins. Cell. 1983;32(3):789–97. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lemaux PG, Herendeen SL, Bloch PL, Neidhardt FC. Transient rates of synthesis of individual polypeptides in E. coli following temperature shifts. Cell. 1978;13(3):427–34. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ehrlich R, Miller S, Walker RL. Relationship between Atmospheric Temperature and Survival of Airborne Bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1970;19(2):245-& WOS:A1970F465600007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.FitzGerald DJ, Willingham MC, Pastan I. Pseudomonas exotoxin—immunotoxins. Cancer Treat Res. 1988;37:161–73. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shapira A, Benhar I. Toxin-based therapeutic approaches. Toxins. 2010;2(11):2519–83. 10.3390/toxins2112519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Salehi AS, Smith MT, Bennett AM, Williams JB, Pitt WG, Bundy BC. Cell-free protein synthesis of a cytotoxic cancer therapeutic: Onconase production and a just-add-water cell-free system. Biotechnology journal. 2016;11(2):274–81. 10.1002/biot.201500237 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.