Skip to main content
Italian Journal of Food Safety logoLink to Italian Journal of Food Safety
. 2016 Jan 28;5(1):5586. doi: 10.4081/ijfs.2016.5586

Meat Juice Serology for Toxoplasma Gondii Infection in Chickens

Alice Vismarra 1, Carlo Mangia 1, Elena Barilli 1, Franco Brindani 1, Cristina Bacci 1,, Laura Kramer 1
PMCID: PMC5076709  PMID: 27800433

Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii is an important foodborne zoonosis. Free-range chickens are at particularly high risk of infection and are also excellent indicators of soil contamination by oocysts. In the present study, hearts of 77 free-range chickens were collected at slaughter. T. gondii meat juice enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed with a commercial kit, following validation with positive controls, from experimentally infected chickens, and negative ones. Out of 77 samples, only 66 gave sufficient meat juice for serology. Of these, 24 (36.4%) were positive for T. gondii considering the 5*standard deviation values (calculated on the optical density of negative controls), while all the samples were negative considering sample/positive% values. Parasite-specific polymerase chain reaction was carried out on all samples obtained from heart tissue and none were positive for the presence of T. gondii DNA. Results would suggest that further study on the use of meat juice with a validated serological test to detect T. gondii in chickens could lead to widespread epidemiological studies in this important intermediate host. However, sample collection and test specificity require further evaluation.

Key words: Toxoplasma gondii, Serology, Meat juice, ELISA

Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii is an Apicomplexan protozoa that is considered as one of the most important food-borne parasitic zoonoses globally (Tenter et al., 2000; McAllister, 2005; Hill and Dubey, 2013). Human infection is acquired through the ingestion of infective oocysts shed by cats, which contaminate the environment, or tissue cysts present in raw or undercooked meat of the many intermediate hosts of the parasite (Dubey, 2010). Birds, including chicken, play an important role in the epidemiology of T. gondii. While raw or undercooked chicken meat as a source of infection for humans is less likely compared to other meats, chickens are an important source of infection for cats that in turn shed oocysts into the environment. Furthermore, free-range chickens are an excellent indicator of soil contamination in that they feed from the ground (Dubey et al., 2015).

Several serological tests can be used to determine T. gondii infection in poultry (Dubey et al., 1993, 2002; Casartelli-Alves et al., 2014), including the modified agglutination test (MAT), indirect immunofluorence antibody test (IFAT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Meat juice serology (MJS) has proven to be an excellent method for detection of T. gondii infection at slaughter in different species, including sheep and pigs, and has been confirmed to correlate well with serum serology (Basso et al., 2013; Meemken et al., 2014; Bacci et al., 2015). The application of meat juice serology would be ideal for large-scale investigations of T. gondii prevalence in poultry.

Thus, the aim of the present study was to determine seroprevalence for T. gondii with meat juice ELISA obtained from free-range chickens using a commercially available diagnostic kit, and to confirm the presence of the parasite with application of molecular biology techniques. Therefore a 200- to 300 fold repetitive fragment (529 bp) and a 35-fold repetitive target (B1) for amplification were used.

Materials and Methods

Animals

From April to July 2015, a total of 77 chickens were sampled: forty chickens came from a backyard farm located in the Piacenza province (northern Italy), while 37 came from a large scale industrial farm with strict biosecurity measures located in Teramo province (central Italy). All animals were raised according to free-range standards, including outdoor access for a minimum of 8 hours a day and slaughter at a minimum of 54 days. The slaughterhouses were located near the poultry farms. Hearts (medium weight around 4-5 g) of 77 animals were collected, put individually in small bags, and immediately frozen at -20°C for 18-24 hours after slaughter. After thawing, meat juice was obtained for use in serology and each heart was conserved for molecular biology, according to Bacci et al. (2015).

Kit validation

A commercial ELISA test kit (ID SCREEN® Toxoplasmosis Indirect Multi-Species; IDvet, Grabels, France) was used. However, since this kit has been developed for detection of anti-T. gondii immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in pigs, cats, ruminants and dogs, some adaptations were made for the diagnosis in chickens. Briefly, the conjugate of the kit was replaced with anti-chicken IgG (whole molecule) peroxidase conjugate (Sigma Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO, USA) and tested with positive control serum obtained from experimentally-infected chickens and negative uninfected controls (kindly provided by Dr. B. Bangoura, University of Leipzig, Germany). In order to define the best conditions for testing meat juice samples, positive controls were tested at different dilutions (1:40, 1:80, 1:160, 1:320). Negative controls were tested in toto. For each condition, the secondary antibody was used at three different concentrations (1:15,000, 1:20,000, 1:30,000). The highest optical density (OD) values for negative controls were considered as plate cut-off. We also modified the incubation temperature to 37°C, according to Sun et al. (2015). Plates were incubated for 1 h with serum samples and then for 45 min with the secondary antibody. All other conditions were met according to manufacturer’s instructions. Optical densities were read at 450 nm with a spectrophotometer (Multiskan FC Microplate Photometer; Thermo Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) and results were expressed in two ways: i) as sample/positive (S/P)% values [S/P%=(ODsample-ODnegative controls)/(ODpositive controls-ODnegative control)×100] greater than 50% (samples with S/P% ≤40% were considered negative, between 40 and 50% were considered doubtful); ii) as 5×the mean standard deviation (SD) of the mean of negative controls (5*SD). All the samples that presented an OD value higher than the value 5*SD were considered positive (Dubey et al., 2005).

Meat juice serology

All collected meat juice samples were tested in toto, according to conditions described above. Based on results of kit validation, secondary antibody was used at a dilution of 1:15,000. Positive serum controls were tested at a 1:40 dilution.

DNA extraction and Toxoplasma gondii identification with polymerase chain reaction

Hearts from all slaughtered chickens were sectioned and homogenised for DNA extraction. Briefly, hearts were surface-sterilised by submersion in 70% ethanol. All the cardiac muscle, cleaned from fat and connective tissue, was sampled and blended with the addition of 50 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Two-hundred µL of tissue were used for the DNA extraction carried out using a commercial kit (DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit; Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA).

Toxoplasma gondii presence was confirmed by a PCR targeting a 529 bp region, using the primers TOX4 and TOX5, as described by Homan et al. (2000). Amplification was performed by 2 min incubation at 94°C followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C, 1 min at 72°C and a final 10 min incubation at 72°C. A second nested-PCR protocol, to confirm or not the presence of T. gondii, was performed essentially as described by Burg et al. (1989) using the internal and external primers amplifying the B1 gene. The first round amplification was performed in a final volume of 25 µL, with 0.1 µM each primer, and 2× reaction mixture (MyTaqmix-ready-to-use; Bioline, Taunton, MA, USA). The amplification protocol foresaw a first denaturation step at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 10 sec, 57°C for 10 sec, 72°C for 30 sec. The nested amplification contained 1 µL of first-round product, 0.5 µM of each primer in a final volume of 25 µL. Nested reaction consisted of 40 cycles (after a first denaturation at 94°C for 2 min) of 94°C for 10 sec, annealing at 62.5°C for 10 sec, 72°C for 15 sec. Negative controls from first round amplification and an additional second round negative control of sterile water were included in the nested reactions. Positive controls were included in each PCR reaction.

The PCR products were fractionated on a 1.5% agarose gel, stained with SybrSafe (Life technologies) and visualized by UV transillumination; the weight of the bands were identified using a marker of molecular weight (100 bp DNA ladder; Promega, Madison, WI, USA).

Results

Of the 77 hearts collected, only 66 gave sufficient meat juice for use in ELISA. Table 1 shows the results of meat juice serology. None of the meat juice samples (0%) were positive when considering S/P% values, while 24 (36.4%) were positive if OD values were expressed as 5*SD values (positive cut-off 0.062). None of the samples was positive for the presence of T. gondii DNA following PCR with two parasite-specific primers.

Table 1.

Results of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (meat juice) and polymerase chain reaction (heart) on the samples in the two farms.

Sample farm Piacenza PCR ELISA OD value Sample farm Teramo PCR ELISA OD value
S/P% 5*SD S/P% 5*SD
1 - - + 0.1387 2 - - - 0.0489
2 - - + 0.0710 4 - - - 0.0474
3 - - + 0.0720 5 - - - 0.0513
5 - - + 0.0772 6 - - - 0.0498
6 - - + 0.1107 8 - - - 0.0515
8 - - + 0.1886 9 - - + 0.0740
11 - - + 0.0838 10 - - - 0.0529
12 - - + 0.0854 11 - - - 0.0484
13 - - + 0.0668 12 - - - 0.0487
14 - - + 0.0625 13 - - - 0.0469
15 - - + 0.1113 14 - - - 0.0519
17 - - + 0.0643 15 - - - 0,0495
18 - - - 0.0577 17 - - - 0.0503
19 - - + 0.0769 19 - - - 0.0522
20 - - + 0.0881 20 - - - 0.0513
21 - - + 0.0636 21 - - - 0.0483
22 - - - 0.0580 23 - - - 0.0500
23 - - - 0.0586 24 - - - 0.0563
24 - - - 0.0576 25 - - - 0.0542
25 - - + 0.1024 26 - - - 0.0518
26 - - + 0.1203 27 - - - 0.0570
27 - - + 0.0671 28 - - - 0.0520
28 - - + 0.0632 29 - - - 0.0500
29 - - - 0.0585 30 - - - 0.0500
30 - - - 0.0588 31 - - + 0.0631
31 - - - 0.0556 32 - - - 0.0496
32 - - - 0.0562 33 - - - 0.0500
33 - - - 0.0573 34 - - - 0.0519
34 - - - 0.0554 35 - - - 0.0497
35 - - + 0.0742 36 - - - 0.0524
36 - - + 0.0850 37 - - - 0.0597
37 - - + 0.1370
38 - - - 0.0556
39 - - - 0.0517
40 - - - 0.0574

PCR, polymerase chain reaction; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; S/P, sample/positive; SD, standard deviation; OD, optical density.

Discussion

A recent review has reported that prevalence of T. gondii in free-range chickens can be as high as 100% (Dubey, 2010), confirming their role in the epidemiology of infection and the related zoonotic risk through consumption of undercooked chicken meat.

Serum serology for T. gondii in chickens can be carried out with different methods, including MAT, IFAT and ELISA. Sensitivity and specificity vary and depend on different factors, including age, number of animals sampled, and test used. Currently, there are no available ELISA tests for T. gondii serology in chickens. However, Casartelli-Alves et al. (2014) recently reported sensitivity and specificity of 85 and 56% respectively, in naturally exposed chickens, using a commercial ELISA adapted to chicken sera. Meat juice serology (MJS) is increasingly used to determine the prevalence of various pathogens in different animal species, including T. gondii infection in pigs and sheep (Lundèn et al., 2002; Berger-Schoch et al., 2011; Glor et al., 2013; Bacci et al., 2015). There are currently no reports on the use of MJS for T. gondii infection in chickens at slaughter. Dubey et al. (2005) applied the ELISA technique to evaluate the presence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in tissue fluid obtained from retail breast meat, reporting a prevalence of 1.3%. In the present study, hearts were used for obtaining meat juice. A recent study has shown that comparison of T. gondii-specific antibody titers in meat juice and serum of pigs revealed a strong positive correlation for meat juice from heart tissue, making this the organ of choice for MJS (Wallander et al., 2015). The commercial kit used in the present survey has been validated for multiple species, but not for chickens, and the protocol was adapted by changing the species-specific conjugate and testing performance with serum from experimentally infected chickens. Serum from experimentally infected chickens was used both in toto for kit validation and at a 1:40 dilution when testing meat juice samples in order to decrease antibody concentration and to better mimic OD values in meat juice, which are consistently lower compared to serum (Wallander et al., 2015). Positive titers in meat juice collected from the hearts were established in two different ways, according to manufactures’ instructions and according to Dubey et al. (2005), resulting in a prevalence of approximately 0 and 36.4% respectively. The results obtained from the two evaluation methods were very different. If the positive control had a very high concentration of immunoglobulin Y, thus giving a high cut off OD value, samples from chickens with low antibody titres may have resulted negative with the S/P% calculation. On the other hand, five times the mean standard deviation of the mean of all samples tested may have resulted in a higher number of false positive samples. It would be necessary to further study the validation of this kit with experimentally infected birds.

Considering 5*SD values, prevalence values were notably different between the two farms, probably due to different farm management. The large scale, industrial free-range chickens are kept under strict biosecurity measures, including barriers, which inhibit access by cats, thus making soil contamination by oocysts nearly impossible. The backyard farm in northern Italy, on the contrary, is family run and the grounds are open to the surrounding countryside.

Parasite-specific PCR was negative in all the samples, thus it was not possible to verify positive serology with the presence of T. gondii in myocardial tissue of naturally exposed, free-range chickens. Hill et al. (2006) reported similar results when comparing diagnostic methods in both T. gondii-experimentally and naturally infected pigs and retail pork products. The authors cited different reasons for DNA-negative samples, including limited tissue sample size and random distribution of tissue cysts. Geuthner et al. (2014) also reported a very low prevalence of T. gondii DNA in muscle tissue from experimentally infected chickens (2.1%), suggesting that T. gondii does not persist for long periods in this species. Dubey et al. (2005) found no positive samples of retail breast meat when tissue was bioassayed in mice. The results of the present study would confirm these previous reports and would suggest that while positivity in MJS may be an indicator of infection risk, it likely does not correlate with detection in the meat.

In Italy free range farms have increased in recent years and approximately 3,500,000 chickens were raised in 2013 (www.istat.it), making Italy one of the most important producers in Europe. For its features, free-range livestock could be a source of infection of T. gondii and an indicator of contamination, even if studies on infection prevalence in Italian poultry are still limited.

Conclusions

To conclude, we have shown that MJS with a commercially available ELISA kit, adapted for chicken serum, can be considered as a promising tool for wide-scale epidemiological studies for T. gondii in poultry. The development of a valid ELISA test for use in slaughtered chickens would be extremely useful since the important role that chickens play in T. gondii epidemiology, in particular for the risk of zoonotic infection and food safety.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Damer Blake for excellent supervision of AV during her PhD training.

References

  1. Bacci C, Vismarra A, Mangia C, Bonardi S, Bruini I, Genchi M, Kramer L, Brindani F, 2015. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in free-range, organic pigs in Italy using serological and molecular methods. Int J Food Microbiol 202:54-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Basso W, Hartnack S, Pardini L, Maksimov P, Koudela B, Venturini MC, Schares G, Sidler X, Lewis FI, Deplazes P, 2013. Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of a commercial ELISA for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pigs compared with IFAT, TgSAG1-ELISA and Western blot, using a Bayesian latent class approach. Int J Parasitol 43:565-70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berger-Schoch AE, Bernet D, Doherr MG, Gottstein B, Frey CF, 2011. Toxoplasma gondii in Switzerland: a serosurvey based on meat juice analysis of slaughtered pigs, wild boar, sheep and cattle. Zoonoses Public Hlth 58:472-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burg JL, Grover CM, Pouletty P, Boothroyd JC, 1989. Direct and sensitive detection of a pathogenic protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii, by Polymerase Chain Reaction. J Clin Microbiol 27:1787-92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Casartelli-Alves L, Boechat VC, Macedo-Couto R, Ferreira LC, Nicolau JL, Neves LB, Millar PR, Vicente RT, Oliveira RV, Muniz AG, Bonna IC, Amendoeira MR, Silva RC, Langoni H, Schubach TM, Menezes RC, 2014. Sensitivity and specificity of serological tests, histopathology and immunohis-tochemistry for detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic chickens. Vet Parasitol 204:346-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dubey JP, 2010. Toxoplasma gondii infections in chickens (Gallus domesticus): prevalence, clinical disease, diagnosis and public health significance. Zoonoses Public Hlth 57:60-73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dubey JP, Graham DH, Blackston CR, Lehmann T, Gennari SM, Ragozo AMA, Nishi SM, Shen SK, Kwok OCH, Hill DE, Thulliez P, 2002. Biological and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from chickens (Gallus domesticus) from Sao Paulo, Brazil: unexpected findings. Int J Parasitol 32:99-105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dubey JP, Hill DE, Jones JL, Hightower AW, Kirkland E, Roberts JM, Marcet PL, Lehmann T, Vianna MC, Miska K, Sreekumar C, Kwok OC, Shen SK, Gamble HR, 2005. Prevalence of viable Toxoplasma gondii in beef, chicken and pork from retail meat stores in the United States: risk assessment to consumers. J Parasitol 91:1082-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dubey JP, Lehmann T, Lautner F, Kwok OC, Gamble HR, 2015. Toxoplasmosis in sentinel chickens (Gallus domesticus) in New England farms: seroconversion, distribution of tissue cysts in brain, heart, and skeletal muscle by bioassay in mice and cats. Vet Parasitol 214:55-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dubey JP, Ruff MD, Camargo ME, Shen SK, Wilkins GL, Kwok OC, Thulliez P, 1993. Serologic and parasitologic responses of domestic chickens after oral inoculation with Toxoplasma gondii oocysts. Am J Vet Res 54:1668-72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Geuthner AC, Koethe M, Ludewig M, Pott S, Schares G, Daugschies A, Bangoura B, 2014. Persistence of Toxoplasma gondii tissue stages in poultry over a conventional fattening cycle. Parasitology 141:1359-64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Glor SB, Edelhofer R, Grimm F, Deplazes P, Basso W, 2013. Evaluation of a commercial ELISA kit for detection of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii in serum, plasma and meat juice from experimentally and naturally infected sheep. Parasite Vector 6:85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hill DE, Chirukandoth S, Dubey JP, Lunney JK, Gamble HR, 2006. Comparison of detection methods for Toxoplasma gondii in naturally and experimentally infected swine. Vet Parasitol 141:9-17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hill DE, Dubey JP, 2013. Toxoplasma gondii prevalence in farm animals in the United States. Int J Parasitol 43:107-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Homan WL, Vercammen M, De Braekeleer J, Verschueren H, 2000. Identification of a 200- to 300-fold repetitive 529 bp DNA fragment in Toxoplasma gondii, and its use for diagnostic and quantitative PCR. Int J Parasitol 30:69-75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lundén A, Lind P, Engvall EO, Gustavsson K, Uggla A, Vågsholm I, 2002. Serological survey of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pigs slaughtered in Sweden. Scand J Infect Dis 34:362-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McAllister MM, 2005. A decade of discoveries in veterinary protozoology changes our concept of “subclinical” toxoplasmosis. Vet Parasitol 132:241-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Meemken D, Tangemann AH, Meermeier D, Gundlach S, Mischok D, Greiner M, Klein G, Blaha T, 2014. Establishment of serological herd profiles for zoonoses and production diseases in pigs by “meat juice multiserology”. Prev Vet Med 113:589-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sun X, Wang Z, Li J, Wei F, Liu Q, 2015. Evaluation of an indirect ELISA using recombinant granule antigen GRA1, GRA7 and soluble antigens for serodiagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection in chickens. Res Vet Sci 100:161-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tenter AM, Heckeroth AR, Weiss LM, 2000. Toxoplasma gondii: from animals to humans. Int J Parasitol 30:1217-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wallander C, Frössling J, Vågsholm I, Burrells A, Lundén A, 2015. “Meat juice” is not a homogeneous serological matrix. Foodborne Pathog Dis 12:280-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Italian Journal of Food Safety are provided here courtesy of PAGEPress

RESOURCES