Abstract
Although abnormal metabolic regulation is a critical determinant of cancer cell behavior, it is still unclear how an altered balance between ATP production and consumption contributes to malignancy. Here we show that disruption of this energy balance efficiently suppresses aggressive malignant gliomas driven by mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) hyperactivation. In a mouse glioma model, mTORC1 hyperactivation induced by conditional Tsc1 deletion increased numbers of glioma-initiating cells (GICs) in vitro and in vivo. Metabolic analysis revealed that mTORC1 hyperactivation enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis, as evidenced by elevations in oxygen consumption rate and ATP production. Inhibition of mitochondrial ATP synthetase was more effective in repressing sphere formation by Tsc1-deficient glioma cells than that by Tsc1-competent glioma cells, indicating a crucial function for mitochondrial bioenergetic capacity in GIC expansion. To translate this observation into the development of novel therapeutics targeting malignant gliomas, we screened drug libraries for small molecule compounds showing greater efficacy in inhibiting the proliferation/survival of Tsc1-deficient cells compared with controls. We identified several compounds able to preferentially inhibit mitochondrial activity, dramatically reducing ATP levels and blocking glioma sphere formation. In human patient-derived glioma cells, nigericin, which reportedly suppresses cancer stem cell properties, induced AMPK phosphorylation that was associated with mTORC1 inactivation and induction of autophagy and led to a marked decrease in sphere formation with loss of GIC marker expression. Furthermore, malignant characteristics of human glioma cells were markedly suppressed by nigericin treatment in vivo. Thus, targeting mTORC1-driven processes, particularly those involved in maintaining a cancer cell's energy balance, may be an effective therapeutic strategy for glioma patients.
Keywords: ATP, brain tumor, drug screening, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), mitochondria
Introduction
Abnormal metabolic regulation is critical for malignant transformation leading to cancer (1, 2). In particular, a tumor cell must maintain a proper energy balance between ATP production and its consumption to support the cell's heightened proliferation, survival, and undifferentiated status. Historically, it has been believed that, even in the presence of oxygen, cancer cells generate energy mainly by glycolysis rather than through mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS),6 a concept known as the Warburg effect (3). However, several previous studies using tumor cells lacking mitochondrial DNA challenged the Warburg hypothesis, because these data showed that tumors depend on mitochondrial respiration for the maintenance of fully transformed malignant phenotypes (4–7). Supporting this idea, recent studies have demonstrated that mitochondrial activity is essential for malignant properties, such as metastasis and multidrug resistance (8–10). Accordingly, several small molecule compounds targeting mitochondrial function have been investigated for their anti-cancer effects (11). For example, numerous clinical studies of metformin, which inhibits mitochondrial complex I, have established the efficacy of this agent for cancer treatment. Other compounds that decrease mitochondrial bioenergetic capacity also have anti-tumor effects; therefore, targeting mitochondrial energetics is deemed to be a promising basis for new cancer therapies.
The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a serine/threonine protein kinase that belongs to the PI3K-related protein kinase family. mTOR participates in two complexes, designated mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and 2 (mTORC2), both of which phosphorylate multiple substrates (12–14). Activation of PI3K via receptor tyrosine kinases leads to activation of AKT. AKT phosphorylates tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2) and blocks the GAP activity of the TSC. The TSC exhibits GAP activity toward the small G protein Rheb and inhibits its ability; therefore, TSC is a negative regulator of mTORC1. Among the substrates of mTORC1 are the p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinases (p70S6Ks), eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF), 4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs), Ulk1, Lipin1, and growth factor receptor-bound protein 10 (Grb10). Phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 by mTORC1 leads to its dissociation from eIF4E, allowing recruitment of eIF4G to the 5′ cap and translation initiation. p70S6Ks phosphorylate ribosomal protein S6, eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2 kinase (eEF2K), cap-binding protein 80 (CBP80), and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4B (eIF4B), all of which stimulate protein synthesis. On one hand, mTORC1 activation induces aerobic glycolysis by up-regulating pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2 (PKM2). On the other hand, mTORC1 activation stimulates several pathways that contribute to mitochondrial activation and OXPHOS. For example, mTORC1 is crucial for the mitochondrial activation mediated by PPAR-γ coactivator 1α (PGC1α) and the transcription factor Ying-Yang 1 (YY1) (15, 16). Another study has demonstrated that mTORC1 stimulates the synthesis of nucleus-encoded mitochondrial proteins via 4E-BPs, resulting in increased mitochondrial ATP production (17). Because mRNA translation is the most energy-consuming process in the cell, mTORC1 coordinates both energy consumption and production, contributing to malignant progression.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common high grade malignant glioma in humans. GBM is categorized as a World Health Organization grade IV astrocytoma, a very aggressive, invasive, and destructive brain tumor (18). Numerous studies have identified a tumor cell population that can initiate glioma development. These cells are called glioma-initiating cells (GICs) and are conceptually recognized as “glioma stem cells” (19). It is the behavior of these GICs that determines the malignant phenotypes of GBM. Alterations in several signaling cascades are known to affect gliomagenesis, including the receptor tyrosine kinase/RAS/PI3K pathway (EGFR, PDGF receptor, Nf1, and PTEN), the p53 pathway (p53, CDKN2A/ARF, and MDM2), and the RB pathway (RB1, CDKN2A/p16INK4A, CDKN2B, and CDKN2C) (20). Consistent with the fact that activation of most of oncogenic signals triggers mTORC1 activation, the phosphorylation status of substrates of mTORC1 is a prognostic indicator for glioma patients (21–23). However, although the mTORC1 pathway is clearly a major player in gliomagenesis and malignant progression, mTORC1 inhibitors, such as rapamycin and its analogs, have failed to successfully treat GBM patients in the clinic. It is speculated that a feedback loop may exist in which mTOR inhibition by the allosteric inhibitors stimulates PI3K activation, supporting survival of tumor cells. Moreover, although mTOR ATP-competitive inhibitors and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors that fully inhibit substrate phosphorylation have been developed (24), these compounds are likely to have unwanted side effects and may cause serious damage to normal tissues. Therefore, there is a pressing need to devise novel approaches to providing effective GBM therapy.
Previously, we reported that hyperactivation of mTORC1 in a murine inducible Tsc1 gene deletion resulted in early tumor onset in an EGFRvIII-driven mouse glioma model (p16Ink4ap19Arf-deficient background) (25). In this glioma model, Tsc1 deletion increased tumor mass and enhanced microvascular formation, leading to intracranial hemorrhage, indicating that mTORC1 hyperactivation promotes malignant phenotypes of glioma in vivo. In the present study, we further investigate the molecular mechanism by which mTORC1 hyperactivation causes the malignant phenotypes of glioma cells. We show that mTORC1 hyperactivation promotes mitochondrial energy production, which in turn supports GIC expansion. Importantly, we use our unique mTORC1-driven glioma model and drug screening system to identify small molecule compounds that may be effective for GBM therapy.
Results
mTORC1 Hyperactivation Expands Mouse GICs in Vitro and in Vivo
To investigate the role of mTORC1 in GIC expansion, we used our previously described mouse glioma model in which mTORC1 is activated by a tamoxifen (TAM)-inducible system (25). Briefly, we infected neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) of Tsc1f/f; Rosa26-CreERT2 mice (p16Ink4a−/− p19Arf−/− background) with retrovirus carrying EGFRvIII gene plus the huKO gene as a marker and injected these infected cells into the basal ganglia of immunocompromised mice. To activate mTORC1 in glioma tissue in vivo, we administrated TAM to NSPC-bearing recipient mice on day 5 post-transplantation. After gliomas had developed (at about 3 weeks post-transplantation), we collected huKO+ cells from digested brain tissues of recipient mice and isolated glioma cells by flow cytometry (Fig. 1A). Efficient deletion of the Tsc1 gene in this system has been confirmed previously by genomic DNA analysis (25). To determine whether Tsc1 deficiency affected sphere formation, we cultured huKO+ cells in ultra-low attachment dishes under standard NSPC culture conditions (i.e. in the absence of serum but in the presence of the growth factors EGF and FGF2). Tsc1 deficiency significantly increased the number of spheres formed (Fig. 1B), indicating that the sphere-forming cells had expanded upon mTORC1 activation. To evaluate the tumor-initiating capacity of glioma cells in vivo, we inoculated recipient mice with 100, 1,000, or 10,000 freshly isolated huKO+ glioma cells. We found that Tsc1 deficiency promoted tumor development and accelerated the death of recipients compared with Tsc1-competent glioma cells (Fig. 1C). When as few as 10 huKO+ cells were transplanted, only Tsc1-deficient glioma cells were capable of producing gliomas and not control cells. Thus, GIC frequency is increased in vivo by mTORC1 activation.
FIGURE 1.
Tsc1 deletion leads to GIC expansion. A, left, bright field view of a representative coronal section of a brain of a recipient mouse that was inoculated with huKO+ NSPCs (Tsc1f/f; Rosa-CreERT2) (see “Experimental Procedures”). Middle, fluorescence microscopy to detect huKO fluorescence in brain sections in the left panel. Inset, tumor region in the brain in the left panel. Right, flow cytometric isolation of huKO+ glioma cells from the inset region. B, quantitation of sphere formation by huKO+ cells isolated from recipient mice that had been treated with (Tsc1Δ/Δ) or without (control) TAM to delete Tsc1. Data are the mean sphere number ± S.D. (error bars). C, Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival of recipient mice inoculated with 100, 1,000, or 10,000 huKO+ cells that had been treated with (Tsc1Δ/Δ) or without (control) TAM. **, p < 0.01.
mTORC1 Activation Causes Growth Factor-independent Proliferation of Mouse GICs
To investigate how mTORC1 activation affects the proliferation and survival of murine GICs, we analyzed the effect of Tsc1 deletion on sphere formation in vitro. We allowed Tsc1f/f; Rosa26-CreERT2 glioma cells to form spheres in culture and then added 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) to delete the Tsc1 gene. First, we confirmed that 4-OHT efficiently induced Tsc1 deletion in these sphere cells, as evidenced by the disappearance of TSC1 protein from lysates of sphere cells that had been cultured with 4-OHT (Fig. 2A). However, unexpectedly, there was no difference in the number of spheres formed by control and Tsc1-deficient cells cultured in the presence of EGF + FGF2 (Fig. 2B). This discrepancy may be due to differences between culture conditions in vitro and microenvironmental conditions in vivo. Although the level of phosphorylation in 4E-BP1 was slightly up-regulated, those of S6 and p70S6K were almost normal in Tsc1-deficient glioma cells cultured under these conditions (Fig. 2A). We speculated that mTORC1 is fully activated when cytokines are abundant and that levels of these factors are much higher in vitro than in vivo; therefore, Tsc1 deletion might not be able to further enhance such signaling in this culture condition. When we cultured control and Tsc1-deficient glioma cells in the absence of EGF + FGF2, the size and number of spheres formed in these control glioma cell cultures was decreased compared with those in control cultures containing growth factors; however, Tsc1-deficient glioma cells showed comparable sphere-forming capacity in the presence and absence of these growth factors (Fig. 2B). Thus, mTORC1 hyperactivation maintains sphere-forming capacity even when growth factors are withdrawn. Consistent with this observation, although levels of S6 and 4E-BP phosphorylation in control glioma cells cultured without growth factors were lower than those with growth factors, such down-regulation of phosphorylation due to growth factor depletion was not observed in Tsc1-deficient cells (Fig. 2A). Because we did not observe a remarkable change in the expression of Olig2, a glioma stem cell marker, in Tsc1-deficient glioma cells (Fig. 2C), we assume that Tsc1 deficiency promotes the proliferation and/or survival of GICs. Finally, whereas the addition of gefitinib, an EGFR inhibitor, inhibited sphere formation by control cells, it had much less effect on sphere formation of Tsc1-deficient cells (Fig. 2D). Thus, mTORC1 hyperactivation induces GIC expansion that is independent of growth factors.
FIGURE 2.
Expansion of GICs induced by Tsc1 deletion is independent of growth factors. A, Western blotting to detect the indicated proteins in control and Tsc1Δ/Δ cells. Deletion of the Tsc1 gene in vitro was induced with 4-OHT treatment to prepare Tsc1Δ/Δ cells (see “Experimental Procedures”). Lysates were prepared from control and Tsc1Δ/Δ cells treated with/without EGF + FGF2 for 24 h. Actin was a loading control. B, quantitation of sphere formation of control and Tsc1Δ/Δ cells cultured with/without EGF + FGF2. Data are the mean sphere number (left) and size (right) ± S.D. (error bars). C, Western blotting to detect Olig2 in control and Tsc1Δ/Δ cells cultured without EGF + FGF2 for 5 days. D, quantitation of sphere formation by control and Tsc1-deficient huKO+ cells cultured with EGF + FGF2 and treated with/without the indicated concentrations of the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib. Data are the mean ± S.D. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Increased Sensitivity of Tsc1-deficient Glioma Cells to Glucose Depletion
We next wanted to dissect the mechanism by which mTORC1 activation affects GIC growth in our mouse glioma model. Although the metabolic status of whole glioma cells might not necessarily be identical to that of GICs due to tumor heterogeneity, we assessed metabolite levels in control and Tsc1-deficient glioma cells in culture in vitro using capillary electrophoresis TOF-MS (26, 27). Several metabolites in the glycolytic pathway, including glucose 6-phosphate (G-6-P), fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (F-1,6-BP), glycerophosphate, 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PGA), and phosphoenol pyruvate (PEP), were significantly up-regulated (Fig. 3A). The same was true for components of the pentose phosphate pathway, including 6-phosphogluconolactone (6-PGL), ribulose 5-phosphate (Ru-5-P), and sedoheptulose 7-phosphate (S-7-P) (Fig. 3A). These findings suggested that glucose metabolism might be stimulated in Tsc1-deficient cells. When we analyzed gene expression levels, we found that mRNAs encoding glycolytic enzymes, such as glucose transporter 1 (Glut1), hexokinase 2 (Hk2), and pyruvate kinase M2 (Pkm2), were all elevated by mTORC1 activation (Fig. 3B). Consistent with the observed increase in Glut1 expression, glucose uptake, which was evaluated by incorporation of the fluorescent glucose analog 2-NBDG, was promoted by Tsc1 deficiency (Fig. 3C). In addition, Tsc1-deficient cells were markedly more sensitive to glucose deprivation compared with controls and showed decreased viability (Fig. 3D). In contrast, a reduction in glutamine, which is an alternative carbon source utilized by several cancer cell types, had a comparable effect on the viability in both control and Tsc1-deficient cells (Fig. 3E). These data indicate that mouse glioma cells experiencing mTORC1 hyperactivation show increased dependence on glucose for survival.
FIGURE 3.
Effects of Tsc1 deficiency on glucose metabolism in mouse glioma cells. A, scheme showing quantitation of changes to metabolites in the pentose phosphate and glycolysis pathways that were associated with Tsc1 deletion in huKO+ cells. Control and Tsc1-deficient cells were cultured without EGF + FGF2 and subjected to quantification of metabolites. Data for each metabolite are the mean ratio ± S.D. (error bars) relative to the value in control cells. B, qRT-PCR analysis of Glut1, Hk2, and Pkm2 mRNA levels in the control and Tsc1-deficient cells in A. Data were normalized to β-actin and are presented as the mean -fold change ± S.D. relative to control cells. C, representative analysis of glucose uptake by control and Tsc1-deficient cells that were treated with 2-NBDG and analyzed by flow cytometry. D and E, quantitation of ratios of viable cells in control and Tsc1-deficient cultures that received the indicated concentrations of glucose (D) or glutamine (E) for 48 h. Cell viability was assessed by a WST-8 assay. Data are the mean ± S.D. and are expressed as the percentage of the value of control cells cultured with 3.15 g/liter glucose (D) or 2.5 mm glutamine (E). **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Enhanced Mitochondrial ATP Production Supports mTORC1-driven GIC Expansion
Our metabolomic analysis showed that lactate levels in glioma cells were not significantly affected by Tsc1 deletion (Fig. 3A). These data suggested that the increased glucose uptake exhibited by Tsc1-deficient cells might contribute to enhanced mitochondrial OXPHOS rather than to the production of lactate via typical glycolysis. To determine OXPHOS in these cells, we evaluated the OCR and found that it was significantly increased in Tsc1-deficient glioma cells (Fig. 4A). In addition, the mitochondrial copy number (Fig. 4B) and expression levels of mitochondria-associated genes were up-regulated by Tsc1 deletion (Fig. 4C). Consistent with this enhanced mitochondrial activity, ATP levels were increased in Tsc1-deficient cells compared with controls (Fig. 4D, left). To assess whether this increase in ATP in Tsc1-deficient cells was in fact due to enhanced OXPHOS, we treated the cells with oligomycin, an ATP synthetase inhibitor. Interestingly, whereas oligomycin had only a modest effect on ATP levels in control cells, it dramatically reduced ATP levels in Tsc1-deficient cells (Fig. 4D, right). Glucose starvation also led to a striking reduction in ATP in Tsc1-deficient cells but not in control cells (Fig. 4E), indicating that mTORC1 hyperactivation drives reliance on mitochondrial activity as the cell's primary energy source. Consistent with the marked ATP reduction in oligomycin-treated Tsc1-deficient glioma cells, oligomycin also profoundly suppressed sphere formation by Tsc1-deficient cells compared with controls (Fig. 4F). These results indicate that mTORC1 hyperactivation stimulates mitochondrial ATP production that is vital for the vigorous expansion of GICs.
FIGURE 4.
Effects of Tsc1 deficiency on mitochondrial function and sphere formation in mouse glioma cells. A, quantitation of OCR by control and Tsc1-deficient cells cultured without EGF + FGF2. Data are the mean ± S.D. (error bars). B, qRT-PCR analysis of mitochondrial DNA content in the cells in A. Data were normalized to genomic DNA and are presented as the mean -fold change ± S.D. relative to control cells. C, qRT-PCR analysis of Atp5g1, Cox5a1, and cytochrome c mRNA levels in the cells in A. Data are the mean -fold change ± S.D. relative to control cells. D and E, quantitation of intracellular ATP levels in control and Tsc1-deficient cells that were cultured without EGF + FGF2 and treated with the ATP synthetase inhibitor oligomycin (D) or glucose withdrawal (E) for 12 h. Data are the mean -fold change ± S.D. relative to control cells. F, quantitation of sphere formation by control and Tsc1-deficient cells that were cultured without EGF + FGF2 and treated with the indicated concentrations of oligomycin. Data are the mean ± S.D. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Drug Screening to Identify Small Molecule Compounds That Can Suppress Sphere Formation by Tsc1-deficient Mouse Glioma Cells
The new application of a known drug, called drug repositioning or drug repurposing, has been a beneficial approach for developing novel therapies for human diseases. With this in mind, we assessed whether our mouse glioma model would be useful for drug screening to identify known compounds able to specifically inhibit the aggressive phenotypes of glioma cells. To this end, we evaluated the effects of numerous small molecule compounds from commercially available existing drug libraries (a total of 1,301 compounds) on the proliferation/survival of control and Tsc1-deficient mouse glioma cells. To compare the efficacy of an individual compound on control versus Tsc1-deficient cells, we first estimated the inhibitory effect of each compound on both types of cells and then calculated the ratio of the inhibitory effect on Tsc1-deficient cells compared with its effect on control cells; we termed this ratio the “index for drug sensitivity of Tsc1-deficient cells” (see “Experimental Procedures”). Most compounds screened exhibited an index of about 1.0 ± 0.5 (Fig. 5A), indicating that they had equal effects on control and Tsc1-deficient cells. Several compounds showed low Index values, suggesting that these drugs were less effective in inhibiting the growth of Tsc1-deficient cells than that of control cells. For example, we found that the EGFR inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib showed less efficacy in Tsc1-deficient cells than in control cells (Fig. 5B, left) (data not shown), consistent with our findings in Fig. 2D. Several genotoxic reagents, including mitoxantrone and topotecan, were also less efficacious in Tsc1-deficient cells (Fig. 5B, right) (data not shown), suggesting that mTORC1 hyperactivation allows glioma cells to resist conventional chemotherapy. In contrast to the above, we identified several compounds that were highly effective in inhibiting the growth of Tsc1-deficient glioma cells compared with that of control cells (Fig. 5C). From our first screening, we selected 13 drugs (nigericin, amoxapine, A23187, auranofin, rottlerin, valinomycin, minocycline, nifedipine, pentamidine, cyclosporine, clodronic acid, clindamycin, and moxifloxacin) that showed reproducible increased efficacy in Tsc1-deficient cells compared with controls. The concentrations of these compounds used in this screening were approximately 0.5–30 μm.
FIGURE 5.
Drug screening for small molecule compounds that have a greater growth-inhibitory effect on Tsc1-deficient glioma cells than on control cells. A, the index for drug sensitivity of Tsc1-deficient glioma cells (see “Experimental Procedures”) for 1,301 compounds is shown. Control and Tsc1-deficient cells were treated with the indicated small molecule compounds, followed by analysis of cell viability 48 h later (1:500 (□), 1:2,000 (○), or 1:10,000 (■) dilution). B and C, quantitation of relative viability of control or Tsc1-deficient cells that were cultured without EGF + FGF2 and treated with the indicated concentrations of the indicated drugs. Data are expressed as the mean percentage of cell viability relative to untreated controls. Examples of “drug-resistant” and “drug-sensitive” profiles are shown in B and C, respectively.
Next, we screened our selected compounds for those that caused a greater reduction in intracellular ATP levels in Tsc1-deficient cells, based on our observation that oligomycin treatment or glucose starvation triggered a significant reduction in ATP in the former. We found that five drugs (nigericin, A23187, auranofin, rottlerin, and valinomycin) clearly reduced intracellular ATP levels when used at less than 20 μm (Fig. 6A). Most of these drugs showed greater inhibitory effects on Tsc1-deficient cells than on control cells, although there were differences in efficacy among these compounds. We confirmed that these five compounds also had a greater suppressive effect on sphere formation by Tsc1-deficient glioma cells than on that by control cells (Fig. 6B), suggesting that our screening system could efficiently identify drug candidates in a therapeutic approach for mTORC1-driven glioma.
FIGURE 6.
Effect of selected small molecule compounds on ATP levels and sphere-forming ability of Tsc1-deficient glioma cells. A and B, quantitation of the effects of the indicated small molecule compounds on ATP levels (A) and sphere formation (B) by control and Tsc1-deficient cells that were treated with the indicated compounds at the indicated concentrations. For A, treatment of cells (6 h) was followed by analysis of intracellular ATP levels. Data are the mean ratios ± S.D. (error bars) relative to untreated control cells. Statistical analyses were performed to detect differences between control and Tsc1-deficient cells at each drug concentration. For B, cells were cultured to allow sphere formation. Data are the mean sphere number ± S.D. Statistical analyses were performed to detect differences between treated and untreated cells at each drug concentration. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
To investigate whether our selected compounds could affect the behavior of human GBM cells as well as mouse Tsc1-deficient glioma cells, we applied each agent to human patient-derived GBM cell lines (TGS-01 and TSG-04 cells). Although it is unclear exactly which GBM subtype these cells represent, they appear to have characteristics similar to the proneural type (rather than to the mesenchymal type) because they express relatively high levels of CD133, which is a proneural subtype marker (28). A recent proteomics analysis has demonstrated that, compared with mesenchymal GBMs, proneural GBMs show elevated expression and activation of elements of the PI3K-AKT-mTORC1 pathway (20). Therefore, like our Tsc1-deficient mouse glioma cells, human TGS-01 and TSG-04 GBM cells may exhibit relatively high levels of mTORC1. We found that all five of our drug compounds reduced ATP in TGS-01 cells compared with untreated GBM cells (Fig. 7A). All compounds also induced abnormality in mitochondrial membrane potential (Fig. 7B). Nigericin (a K+/H+ ion exchanger) induced mitochondrial membrane hyperpolarization, as previously reported (29), whereas A23187 (Ca2+ ionophore), rottlerin (K+ ionophore), and valinomycin (K+ ionophore) triggered depolarization (Fig. 7B), indicating that an abnormality of ion channels causes mitochondrial dysfunction. Cells exposed to auranofin, a gold(I)-phosphine derivative used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, also showed depolarization, because this agent reportedly induces the mitochondrial membrane permeability transition, which is manifested as mitochondrial swelling and loss of membrane potential (30). Therefore, we speculated that treatment with most of these selected compounds might drive down intracellular ATP levels by interfering with mitochondrial ATP production.
FIGURE 7.
Effects of selected small molecule compounds on mitochondrial functions. A, quantitation of intracellular ATP levels in human GBM patient-derived TGS-01 cells that were treated with the indicated concentrations of the indicated compounds for 6 h. Data are the mean -fold change ± S.D. (error bars) relative to untreated control cells. B, analysis of mitochondrial membrane potential in TGS-01 cells that were treated for 30 min with the indicated concentrations of the indicated compounds, followed by determination of mitochondrial membrane potential using JC-10. Representative flow cytometric data for cells with (red line) or without (blue line) drug treatment are shown. C, quantitation of changes in OCR in AGS cells that were treated first with oligomycin to inhibit ATP synthetase activity and then with DMSO (vehicle control), nigericin (1 μm), or valinomycin (1 μm) (n = 3). Data are mean ± S.D. percent of OCR (n = 3). **, p < 0.01; ****, p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Because it was previously reported that nigericin and valinomycin affect mitochondrial respiratory chain (31), we attempted to confirm their effects. After down-regulation of OCR by ATP synthase inhibition (oligomycin treatment), it was recovered by valinomycin (as expected), because valinomycin is an uncoupler (Fig. 7C). In contrast, nigericin treatment blocked the respiratory chain and maintained its suppression even after the addition of carbonyl cyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (an uncoupler), indicating that nigericin is an efficient inhibitor of mitochondrial bioenergetics. Thus, compounds selected by a combination of our “index for drug sensitivity in Tsc1-deficient mouse glioma cells” and their effects on ATP levels induce mitochondrial dysfunction. These data demonstrate that our drug screening system can efficiently select small molecule compounds capable of disrupting a glioma cell's energy balance.
Nigericin Suppresses Malignant Phenotypes of Human Patient-derived GBM Cells
We next investigated whether our selected compounds might have therapeutic potential for human GBM. Among our candidates, nigericin has previously been selected by a drug screening program as being capable of targeting cancer stem cell properties, which are induced by the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Therefore, we focused on nigericin to determine whether this compound could have an advantage in suppression of malignant phenotypes of human GBM cells in vitro and in vivo. We found that nigericin could indeed effectively reduce sphere formation by human GBM cells in culture (Fig. 8A). Whereas nigericin treatment blocked the cell cycle, specifically S-phase entry, as determined by BrdU incorporation (Fig. 8B), it did not induce significant apoptosis (data not shown). Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) were up-regulated in glioma cells, as detected by MitoSOX (Fig. 8C), indicating that nigericin induces mitochondrial dysfunction. Moreover, expression levels of the glioma stem cell markers, Olig2 and CD133, were dramatically down-regulated during culture with nigericin (Fig. 8, D and E). These data indicate that nigericin suppresses proliferation of GBM cells, associated with the loss of stem cell properties. Interestingly, nigericin clearly triggered AMPK phosphorylation that was associated with marked inhibition of phosphorylated S6K and 4E-BP1 (Fig. 8F), suggesting that down-regulation of ATP levels stimulates an anti-tumor signaling cascade that includes AMPK activation and mTORC1 inactivation. mTOR inhibition and AMPK activation are both known to induce autophagy (12), and, as expected, nigericin dramatically induced autophagy in glioma cells, as determined by an observed increase in the LC3-II/LC3-I ratio (Fig. 8F). To investigate whether nigericin inhibits sphere formation due to abnormality in energy control, we increased the concentration of sodium pyruvate in culture media, because pyruvic acid supplies energy to cells through the OXPHOS in the presence of oxygen. As a result, the addition of sodium pyruvate mitigated the inhibitory effect of a low concentration, but not a higher concentration (>0.1 μm), of nigericin on sphere formation (Fig. 8G). These data suggest that a low dose of nigericin inhibits sphere formation due to partial, not complete, impairment of mitochondrial energy production. Although remarkable changes of energy signals were not observed with such a low dose of nigericin, presumably due to subtle changes below detectable limits, these data support the idea that energy imbalance causes dysfunction of GICs.
FIGURE 8.
Therapeutic potential of nigericin for treatment of human GBM in vitro. A, quantitation of sphere formation by TGS-01 (left) and TGS-04 (right) human patient-derived GBM cells that were treated with the indicated concentrations of nigericin. Data are the mean sphere number ± S.D. (error bars). B, cell cycle analysis of TGS-01 cells that were treated with 5 μm nigericin for 3 h. Data are the mean percentage of cells ± S.D. in the indicated stages of the cell cycle. C, representative MitoSOX flow cytometric analysis of mitochondrial ROS in TGS-01 cells that were treated with 1 μm nigericin for 6 h. Gray line, no staining; black dashed line, DMSO control; black solid line, nigericin. D and E, expression of GIC markers of TGS-01 cells that were treated with 0.1 (D) or 0.5 μm (D and E) nigericin in adherent cell culture condition for 4 days. D, Western blotting to detect the indicated proteins. E, representative flow cytometric analysis of CD133 expression. Gray line, no staining; black dashed line, DMSO control; black solid line, nigericin. F, Western blotting to detect the indicated proteins in TGS-01 cells that were treated with 5 μm nigericin for 0, 1, or 3 h. G, quantitation of sphere formation by TGS-01 cells that were treated with nigericin in culture medium containing normal (0.5 mm) or high concentration (1.5 mm) of sodium pyruvate. N, normal concentration; H, high concentration. Data are the mean ratios of sphere number ± S.D. relative to untreated cells with normal concentration of sodium pyruvate. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Last, we determined whether nigericin administration could inhibit glioma growth in vivo. Immunocompromised mice were injected with human GBM cells, and tumor development was monitored. Indeed, tumor volume was greatly reduced in nigericin-treated recipient mice (Fig. 9A). Histological analyses showed that important histological hallmarks for GBM malignancy, such as remarkable vasculature formation and pseudopalisading necrosis, were observed in control tumor tissues (Fig. 9B). In contrast, these malignant characteristics dramatically disappeared, associated with down-regulation of Ki67 staining, by nigericin treatment in vivo (Fig. 9B). When we evaluated the effect of nigericin on tumor cell growth in recipient mice bearing Tsc1Δ/Δ or control mouse glioma cells, we found that nigericin profoundly suppressed the growth of Tsc1-deficient tumors in vivo, consistent with our in vitro results (Fig. 9C). In addition, when we evaluated the effects of our other candidate agents on human GBM cells, we found that all of these compounds suppressed sphere formation (data not shown). We selected auranofin to perform an in vivo experiment because this agent has been clinically approved for treatment of rheumatoid disease, as mentioned above. We found that auranofin treatment of glioma-bearing mice resulted in a significant reduction in GBM growth in vivo (Fig. 9D). These data clearly indicate that our screening system based on an mTORC1-driven glioma model is useful for selecting compounds able to target aggressive malignant gliomas.
FIGURE 9.
Therapeutic potential of nigericin and auranofin for treatment of human GBM in vivo. A, quantitation of volumes of tumors in mice that had been subcutaneously inoculated with TGS-01 cells and treated with DMSO (control) or nigericin. Data are the mean volume ± S.D. (error bars) for tumors from control (n = 6) and nigericin-treated (n = 8) mice. Statistical analyses were performed to detect differences between treated and untreated mice. B, immunohistochemistry analyses of tumors that were isolated from the mice in A and subjected to H&E staining or immunostaining with Ki67 antibody. Data are representative of 6 tumors examined/group. Scale bars, 50 μm. V and N, vasculature and necrotic area, respectively. C, quantitation of volumes of tumors in mice subcutaneously inoculated with huKO+ glioma cells (Tsc1f/f; Rosa-CreERT2) and treated with/without TAM, which was administrated on day 1 after tumor cell inoculation. Nigericin (4 mg/kg/day, i.p. injection, every 2 days) was administered on day 6 postinoculation. Data are the mean volume ± S.D. for tumors from control (n = 10) and nigericin-treated (n = 6) mice at 16 days after tumor cell inoculation. D, quantitation of volumes of tumors in the mice that had been subcutaneously inoculated with TGS-01 cells and treated with/without auranofin. Data are the mean volume ± S.D. for tumors from control (n = 10) and auranofin-treated (n = 8) mice. Statistical analyses were performed to detect differences between treated and untreated mice. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Discussion
There is much debate over the metabolic status of cancer stem cells in several types of tumors, including gliomas. One study reported that GICs are primarily glycolytic and that pharmaceutical inhibition of glycolysis decreases the tumorigenicity of these cells (32). However, another study found that undifferentiated glioma cells show predominantly mitochondrial activity (33). These discrepancies may be due to fact that metabolic status is dynamic and easily influenced by factors critical for the determination of cancer cell fate (e.g. the cell of origin of the tumor, the types of gene mutations it bears, and the nutrient conditions in the surrounding microenvironment). This complexity makes it difficult to precisely define the role of metabolic regulation in a given cancer. In our study, we focused on the relationship between metabolic status and mTOR signaling in glioma because mTORC1 hyperactivation correlates well with GBM patient prognosis (21–23). We found that mTORC1 hyperactivation increased energy dependence by mitochondrial OXPHOS. Although hyperactivation of mTORC1 is known to stimulate not only mitochondrial activity but also the metabolism of lipids, nucleotides, and other cellular components, our data clearly indicate that enhanced bioenergetic capacity is crucial for expansion of GICs, supporting glioma malignancy.
Previously, Gupta et al. (34) developed a drug screening system to select specific inhibitors of breast cancer stem cells. In that study, mammalian epithelial cells were induced to transdifferentiate into a mesenchymal cell type by knockdown of E-cadherin. These cells acquired cancer stem cell properties, including a CD44+/CD24− surface marker pattern, enhanced sphere formation capacity, and therapeutic resistance. Chemical screening for compounds that selectively killed mammalian epithelial cells exhibiting E-cadherin knockdown revealed that salinomycin (a K+ ionophore) suppressed mammary tumor growth and induced epithelial differentiation. Nigericin was also selected in that screening, although the effects of this agent were not fully characterized. Nigericin is a K+ ionophore that causes hyperpolarization of mitochondria, respiratory chain abnormalities, and reduced ATP production (31, 35). In addition, in a nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell line, nigericin treatment down-regulated expression of Bim1, a critical molecule supporting stem cell properties (36). Thus, like salinomycin, nigericin appears to have selective effects on cancer stem cells. Our identification of nigericin as an agent blocking the growth of mTORC1-driven mouse glioma cells demonstrates that our drug screening system is useful for isolating small molecule compounds capable of targeting cancer stem cells.
We speculated that a therapeutic approach based on the specific targeting of mitochondrial ATP production would trigger a dramatic energy imbalance in mTOR-driven glioma cells. Because enhanced protein synthesis stimulated by mTORC1 activation induces an increase in ATP consumption due to heightened mRNA translation, disruption of this altered balance between ATP production and consumption by small molecule compounds such as oligomycin might lead to an energy crisis in mTORC1-driven glioma cells. It remains possible that nigericin and the other drug candidates selected by our screening process have effects in addition to their reduction of ATP levels that result in suppression of mTORC1-driven malignant phenotypes. For example, nigericin reportedly affects inflammasome activation (37), and such additional effects could conceivably contribute to suppression of tumor growth in vivo. Although we are not currently able to exclude this possibility for individual agents, the fact that our system efficiently selected several compounds that induce mitochondrial abnormalities supports our hypothesis that targeting the altered energy balance in glioma cells has the potential to bring therapeutic benefits to glioma patients.
The biguanide metformin was originally used for treatment of diabetes mellitus but was recently found to have a potent tumor-suppressive effect that is independent of its anti-hyperglycemic function (11). A key outcome of metformin treatment is inhibition of mitochondrial complex I in the electron transport chain, which leads to an increase in the AMP/ATP ratio. This imbalance in turn induces activation of AMPK, a critical energy sensor that integrates multiple signaling pathways. In our study, we found that, like metformin, nigericin induces AMPK activation associated with mTORC1 inhibition. We also uncovered the interesting possibility that disruption of a cell's energy balance may induce glioma cell differentiation mediated by AMPK activation. On the other hand, more detailed evaluations of our observations are required for their translational application because nigericin administration did not greatly extend the survival of recipient mice bearing human GBM cells in the brain (data not shown), presumably due to the inability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Therefore, the characterization of individual compounds for their pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in brain tissues is also important for any drug repositioning or drug repurposing designed to treat GBM patients. Further investigation is required to determine how these compounds exert tumor suppression and to develop efficient anticancer therapeutics.
Experimental Procedures
Mice
Rosa26-CreERT2 mice were the kind gift of Dr. Tyler Jacks (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). p16Ink4a+/− p19Arf+/− mice were obtained from the Mouse Models of Human Cancers Consortium of NCI-Frederick, National Institutes of Health (38, 39). Tsc1f/f mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. For transplantation experiments using mouse and human glioma cells, BALB/c nu/nu mice (4-week-old females) were purchased from Sankyo Laboratory Service. All animal experiments were approved by the Committee on Animal Experimentation of Kanazawa University and performed following the university's guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.
Mouse Glioma Model
Glioma-bearing mice were established as described previously (25). Briefly, primary NSPCs were isolated from subventricular zone regions of Tsc1f/f; Rosa26-CreERT2 mice (p16Ink4a−/−p19Arf−/− background) and cultured in Coaster Ultra-low attachment plates (Corning Inc.) in serum-free NSPC medium, which contained DMEM/F-12, B27, and 50 units/ml penicillin, 0.5% streptomycin (all from Life Technologies), plus 20 ng/ml human FGF2 (Wako) and 20 ng/ml human EGF (Sigma). For preparation of retrovirus carrying EGFRvIII, Plat-E cells, provided by Dr. Toshio Kitamura (Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo), were transfected with pGCDN-EGFRvIII-IRES- humanized Kusabira-Orange (huKO), provided by Dr. Masafumi Onodera, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development (40). Retrovirus-containing supernatants were concentrated by centrifugation at 6,000 × g for 16 h. Cultured primary NSPCs were infected with pGCDN-EGFRvIII-IRES-huKO-expressing retroviruses for 24 h and maintained in culture until transplantation. EGFRvIII-transduced NSPCs were dissociated into single cells and resuspended in 5% FBS/PBS, and 1 × 104 cells were inoculated into the brains of anesthetized BALB/c nu/nu mice. For nigericin treatment in vivo, 1 × 106 huKO+ cells (Tsc1f/f; Rosa-CreERT2) were subcutaneously transplanted into female BALB/c nu/nu mice. To delete the Tsc1 gene in tumor cells in vivo, recipient mice were injected i.p. with 1 mg/day TAM (Sigma) or vehicle control (corn oil, Sigma) for 4 days. To isolate glioma cells, tumor tissues were dissociated with the Brain Tumor Dissociation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec), and huKO+ cells were sorted using a BD FACSAria III instrument (BD Biosciences). For transplantation of glioma cells, 100, 1,000, or 10,000 huKO+ cells were inoculated into the brains of recipient mice.
Cell Culture
To delete the Tsc1 gene in mouse glioma cells in vitro, huKO+ cells (Tsc1f/f; Rosa-CreERT2) were cultured for 3 days in complete NSPC medium (containing EGF + FGF2) plus 0.1 μm 4-OHT (Sigma). Cultures were washed clean of 4-OHT and cultured for another 2 days in complete NSPC medium. For sphere formation assays, single-cell suspensions were prepared using Accutase (Innovative Cell Technologies, Inc.) and filtered through a 40-μm cell strainer (BD Biosciences), followed by culture for 7 days in NSPC medium with or without EGF + FGF2 and containing 1% methylcellulose (Wako). Human patient-derived GBM cells, termed TGS-01 and TGS-04, were established as described previously (41). Use of these human materials and protocols was approved by the ethics committees of Kanazawa University and the University of Tokyo. For glucose or glutamine starvation assays, cells were cultured in DMEM/F-12 without glucose (Nacalai Tesque, Inc.) or glutamine (Life Technologies) containing B27 and penicillin/streptomycin, plus glucose (Sigma) or glutamine (Life Technologies) added at the concentrations specified in the figures. To increase pyruvic acid level in glioma cells, sodium pyruvate stock solution (100 mm, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added to normal NSPC medium (final concentration was increased from 0.5 to 1.5 mm). To determine CD133 expression in the human glioma TGS-01 cell line, filtered cells were stained with anti-CD133 antibody (Ab) (Miltenyi Biotec, 130-098-129), incubated on ice for 30 min, and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Drug Screening
Libraries used for drug screening were as follows: Food and Drug Administration-approved drug library (ENZO; CB-BML-2841J0100), ICCB known bioactives library (ENZO; CB-BML-2840J0100), kinase inhibitor library (ENZO; CB-BML-2832J0100), fatty acid library (ENZO; CB-BML-2803J0100), and phosphatase inhibitor library (ENZO; CB-BML-2834J0100). To confirm the effects of individual compounds, we assayed nigericin (Sigma-Aldrich), amoxapine (Wako), A23187 (Sigma-Aldrich), valinomycin (Sigma-Aldrich), rottlerin (Abcam), auranofin (Abcam), clodronic acid (Cayman), moxifloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich), nifidipine (Sigma-Aldrich), minocycline (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), clindamycin (Sigma-Aldrich), and pentamidine (Sigma-Aldrich). Briefly, control and Tsc1-deficient glioma cells were treated with a compound at three doses (1:500, 1:2,000, and 1:10,000 dilution of provided compounds in the library) in 384-well plates (Corning) for 48 h, followed by analysis of cell viability as mentioned below. The “index for drug sensitivity of Tsc1-deficient glioma cells” was calculated as the ratio of value 2/value 1 at a specific dose of a compound, where value 1 was for the drug efficacy in Tsc1-deficient glioma cells (e.g. 0.2 means 80% reduction), and value 2 was for the drug efficacy in control cells (e.g. 0.8 means 20% reduction). An index >1.0 means that Tsc1-deficient glioma cells were more sensitive than control glioma cells to the drug. An index <1.0 means that loss of Tsc1 induced drug resistance.
Western Blotting
Proteins were extracted with lysis buffer (0.1 m Tris (pH 6.7), 4% SDS, phosphatase inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific), complete mini (Roche Applied Science)) and quantified using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Proteins (5 μg) were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto 0.45-mm PVDF membranes (Millipore). Membranes were blocked in 5% (w/v) BSA, 0.02% (v/v) Tween 20, PBS and incubated with primary Abs overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary Abs (GE Healthcare) and detection with ECL Prime (GE Healthcare). Primary Abs recognizing the following proteins were used: Tsc1 (catalog no. 4906), pp70S6K (Thr-389) (catalog no. 9234), p70S6K (catalog no. 2708), pS6 (Ser-235/236) (catalog no. 4858), S6 (catalog no. 2217), p4E-BP1 (Thr-37/46) (catalog no. 2855), 4E-BP1 (catalog no. 9644), pAMPK α (Thr-172) (catalog no. 2535), AMPK α (catalog no. 2532) (all from Cell Signaling Technologies; 1:1,000), actin (Sigma-Aldrich, A5441; 1:2,000), Nestin (Millipore, AB5922; 1:500), Olig2 (IBL, 18953; 1:500), GFAP (BD Biosciences, 556328; 1:1,000), TuJ1 (Covance, MMS-435P; 1:1,000), and LC3 (NanoTools clone 5F10, 0231; 1:200).
PCR
Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy minikit (Qiagen). Total RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using SuperScript reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.). Genomic and mitochondrial DNAs were extracted with 50 mm NaOH followed by neutralization with 1 m Tris-HCl. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed with Mx3000P (Stratagene). The following cycle parameters were used: denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s at 58 °C, and elongation for 30 s at 72 °C. Sequences of sense and antisense primers used were as follows: Slc2a1 sense, 5′-CAGTTCGGCTATAACACTGGTG-3′; Slc2a1 antisense, 5′-GCCCCCGACAGAGAAGATG-3′; Hk2 sense, 5′-TGATCGCCTGCTTATTCACGG-3′; Hk2 antisense, 5′-AACCGCCTAGAAATCTCCAGA-3′; Pkm2 sense, 5′-GCCGCCTGGACATTGACTC-3′; Pkm2 antisense, 5′-CCATGAGAGAAATTCAGCCGAG-3′; Atp5g1 sense, 5′-CCAGAGGCCCCATCTAAGC-3′; Atp5g1 antisense, 5′-CCCCAGAATGGCATAGGAGAAG-3′; Cox5a1 sense, 5′-GCCGCTGTCTGTTCCATTC-3′; Cox5a1 antisense, 5′-GCATCAATGTCTGGCTTGTTGAA-3′; Cycs sense, 5′-CCAAATCTCCACGGTCTGTTC-3′; Cycs antisense, 5′-ATCAGGGTATCCTCTCCCCAG-3′; Actb sense, 5′-GGCTGTATTCCCCTCCATCG-3′; Actb antisense, 5′-CCAGTTGGTAACAATGCCATGT-3′; mitochondrial DNA (Cytb) sense, 5′-TATTCCTTCATGTCGGACGA-3′; mitochondrial DNA (Cytb) antisense, 5′-AAATGCTGTGGCTATGACTG-3′, genomic DNA (Gapdh) sense, 5′-CAAGGTCATCCATGACAACTTTG-3′; genomic DNA (Gapdh) antisense, 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCACTGCCA-3′.
Intracellular ATP Quantification
Intracellular ATP levels were quantified using the CellTiter-Glo luminescent cell viability assay (Promega) following the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were cultured in 96- or 384-well ultralow attachment plates (Corning), and the luminescence representing the ATP level was measured by an Infinite Pro 200 reader (Tecan).
Glucose Uptake Analysis
Cells were pulsed with 25 μm 2-NBDG (Life Technologies) in NSPC medium without EGF + FGF2 for 1 h. Cells were resuspended in 5% FBS, 1× PBS(−), and 2-NBDG+ cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.
Cell Viability Assay
Cell viability was assessed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo) following the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were incubated with WST-8 reagent for 3 h, and absorbance at 450 nm was compared using an Infinite Pro 200 reader (Tecan).
Quantification of Metabolites
For capillary electrophoresis TOF-MS analysis, three independent samples of control or Tsc1-deficient mouse glioma cells (3 × 106) that had been cultured in NSPC medium without EGF + FGF2 were lysed with methanol (1 ml) containing 25 μm internal standards (L-methionine sulfone (Wako), 2-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid, monohydrate (MES) (Dojindo), D-camphor-10-sulfonic acid sodium salt (CSA) (Wako)) and homogenized to inactivate enzymes. The sample (400 μl) was transferred to a fresh tube, and 200 μl of chloroform was added. The mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 3 min at 4 °C, and 400 μl of the upper aqueous layer was centrifugally filtered through a Millipore 5-kDa cut-off filter to remove proteins. The filtrate samples (320 μl) were lyophilized and dissolved in 25 μl of Milli-Q water containing 200 μm reference compounds (3-aminopyrrolidine, Aldrich, and trimesate, Wako) before capillary electrophoresis TOF-MS analysis (26, 27).
Mitochondrial Membrane Potential and ROS Generation
To determine mitochondrial membrane potential, cells were treated for 30 min with small molecule compounds at the concentrations indicated in the figure legends, followed by incubation with JC-10 dye buffer (Abcam) for 30 min at 37 °C in 5% CO2. For analysis of mitochondria-derived ROS, cells were treated with 1 μm nigericin for 6 h, incubated with 5 μm MitoSOX Red (Life Technologies) for 30 min, washed twice with 5% FBS/PBS, and stained with 7-aminoactinomycin D (BD Biosciences) to exclude dead cells. Measurements of membrane potential and ROS were performed by flow cytometry.
Oxygen Consumption Assay
The OCR was measured using an XF24 extracellular flux analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For analysis of the effects of small molecule compounds on OCR, AGS cells (a human gastric cancer cell line, from ATCC) were seeded at 4 × 104 cells/well in 500 μl of supplemented culture medium (DMEM, Seahorse Bioscience, 102365). OCR was measured at preset time intervals while the instrument automatically carried out preprogrammed additions of oligomycin (1 μm; Cell Signaling Technology, 9996), carbonyl cyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (400 nm; Sigma, C2920), and antimycin A (1 μm; Sigma, A8674).
Cell Cycle Analysis
Cell cycle analysis was performed as described previously (42). Briefly, BrdU (10 μm) was added to the cultures, and incubation continued at 37 °C for 30 min. Cells were collected and washed with PBS, followed by the addition of 70% EtOH (−30 °C) for 16 h. Cells were then incubated with 2 n HCl, 0.5% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature, followed by treatment with 0.1 m borax buffer (10 mm borax, 50 mm boric acid) for 2 min at room temperature. Cells were stained with anti-BrdU-FITC Ab (BD Biosciences) for 1 h at room temperature while avoiding light. Labeled cells were resuspended in PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 7-aminoactinomycin D (BD Biosciences), followed by cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry.
Tumor Xenografts
Cells (1 × 106/100 μl/inoculation site) were mixed with Matrigel matrix (Fisher, 356234) (1:1.4 ratio) and subcutaneously transplanted into each of the two flanks of anesthetized female BALB/c nu/nu mice. Nigericin (4 mg/ml) or auranofin (12 mg/ml) dissolved in DMSO was mixed with corn oil (1:4 ratio). Nigericin (4 mg/kg/day, i.p. injection, every 2 days) or auranofin (12 mg/kg/day for 2 days, i.p. injection) was administered on day 1 after inoculation of TGS-01 cells. Tumor volume was measured using a conventional formula, volume (V) = (W2 × L)/2, where W is width and L is length.
Immunohistochemistry
Tumors derived from xenografted patient-derived GBM cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C overnight and embedded in paraffin. Sections were stained with H&E. For immunostaining, sections were treated with target retrieval solution (Dako) and stained with anti-Ki67 (BD Biosciences, 550609; 1:100), followed by visualization with an HRP-conjugated secondary Ab (GE Healthcare) and the DAB Peroxidase Substrate Kit (Vector Laboratories). Stained sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and viewed using a microscope (Axio ImagerA1, Carl Zeiss).
Statistical Analyses
Student's t test was used when comparing two groups, and one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test was used when comparing more than two groups. For the survival analysis in Fig. 1C, differences in survival rate were analyzed by the log-rank test. Calculations of significance were performed using Prism6 software: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001.
Author Contributions
A. H. conceived and designed the research; A. M. H., D. Y., M. K., S. K., M. A. E., K. O., M. U., and Y. T. performed the experiments; Y. I. and T. T. prepared human glioma samples; T. T., T. S., C. T., and A. H. analyzed the data; and A. M. H., D. Y., M. K., and A. H. wrote the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Tyler Jacks for providing Rosa26-CreERT2 mice; Dr. Masafumi Onodera for the pGCDNsam-ires-eGFP vector; Dr. Toshio Kitamura for Plat-E retroviral packaging cells; and Eri Azechi and Kazue Sawa for expert technical support.
This work was supported by a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (A) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan, and Project for Development of Innovative Research on Cancer Therapeutics (P-DIRECT)/Project for Cancer Research and Therapeutic Evolution (P-CREATE) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
- OXPHOS
- oxidative phosphorylation
- 2NBDG
- 2-N-7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl amino-2-deoxyglucose
- OCR
- oxygen consumption rate
- mTOR
- mammalian target of rapamycin
- TSC
- tuberous sclerosis complex
- p70S6K
- p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase
- eIF
- eukaryotic initiation factor
- 4E-BP
- 4E-binding protein
- PKM2
- pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2
- GBM
- glioblastoma
- GIC
- glioma-initiating cell
- EGFR
- EGF receptor
- NSPC
- neural stem/progenitor cell
- TAM
- tamoxifen
- hKO
- humanized Kusabira Orange
- 4-OHT
- 4-hydroxytamoxifen
- ROS
- reactive oxygen species
- Ab
- antibody
- qRT-PCR
- quantitative RT-PCR.
References
- 1. Cantor J. R., and Sabatini D. M. (2012) Cancer cell metabolism: one hallmark, many faces. Cancer Discov. 2, 881–898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Boroughs L. K., and DeBerardinis R. J. (2015) Metabolic pathways promoting cancer cell survival and growth. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 351–359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Vander Heiden M. G., Cantley L. C., and Thompson C. B. (2009) Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324, 1029–1033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hayashi J., Takemitsu M., and Nonaka I. (1992) Recovery of the missing tumorigenicity in mitochondrial DNA-less HeLa cells by introduction of mitochondrial DNA from normal human cells. Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 18, 123–129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cavalli L. R., Varella-Garcia M., and Liang B. C. (1997) Diminished tumorigenic phenotype after depletion of mitochondrial DNA. Cell Growth Differ. 8, 1189–1198 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Morais R., Zinkewich-Péotti K., Parent M., Wang H., Babai F., and Zollinger M. (1994) Tumor-forming ability in athymic nude mice of human cell lines devoid of mitochondrial DNA. Cancer Res. 54, 3889–3896 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Tan A. S., Baty J. W., Dong L. F., Bezawork-Geleta A., Endaya B., Goodwin J., Bajzikova M., Kovarova J., Peterka M., Yan B., Pesdar E. A., Sobol M., Filimonenko A., Stuart S., Vondrusova M., Kluckova K., Sachaphibulkij K., Rohlena J., Hozak P., Truksa J., Eccles D., Haupt L. M., Griffiths L. R., Neuzil J., and Berridge M. V. (2015) Mitochondrial genome acquisition restores respiratory function and tumorigenic potential of cancer cells without mitochondrial DNA. Cell Metab. 21, 81–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. LeBleu V. S., O'Connell J. T., Gonzalez Herrera K. N., Wikman H., Pantel K., Haigis M. C., de Carvalho F. M., Damascena A., Domingos Chinen L. T., Rocha R. M., Asara J. M., and Kalluri R. (2014) PGC-1α mediates mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative phosphorylation in cancer cells to promote metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 992–1003, 1–15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Viale A., Pettazzoni P., Lyssiotis C. A., Ying H., Sánchez N., Marchesini M., Carugo A., Green T., Seth S., Giuliani V., Kost-Alimova M., Muller F., Colla S., Nezi L., Genovese G., et al. (2014) Oncogene ablation-resistant pancreatic cancer cells depend on mitochondrial function. Nature 514, 628–632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Roesch A., Vultur A., Bogeski I., Wang H., Zimmermann K. M., Speicher D., Körbel C., Laschke M. W., Gimotty P. A., Philipp S. E., Krause E., Pätzold S., Villanueva J., Krepler C., Fukunaga-Kalabis M., et al. (2013) Overcoming intrinsic multidrug resistance in melanoma by blocking the mitochondrial respiratory chain of slow-cycling JARID1B(high) cells. Cancer Cell 23, 811–825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Foretz M., Guigas B., Bertrand L., Pollak M., and Viollet B. (2014) Metformin: from mechanisms of action to therapies. Cell Metab. 20, 953–966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Laplante M., and Sabatini D. M. (2012) mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell 149, 274–293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wullschleger S., Loewith R., and Hall M. N. (2006) TOR signaling in growth and metabolism. Cell 124, 471–484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hoshii T., Matsuda S., and Hirao A. (2014) Pleiotropic roles of mTOR complexes in haemato-lymphopoiesis and leukemogenesis. J. Biochem. 156, 73–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ramanathan A., and Schreiber S. L. (2009) Direct control of mitochondrial function by mTOR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 22229–22232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Cunningham J. T., Rodgers J. T., Arlow D. H., Vazquez F., Mootha V. K., and Puigserver P. (2007) mTOR controls mitochondrial oxidative function through a YY1-PGC-1α transcriptional complex. Nature 450, 736–740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Morita M., Gravel S. P., Chénard V., Sikström K., Zheng L., Alain T., Gandin V., Avizonis D., Arguello M., Zakaria C., McLaughlan S., Nouet Y., Pause A., Pollak M., Gottlieb E., et al. (2013) mTORC1 controls mitochondrial activity and biogenesis through 4E-BP-dependent translational regulation. Cell Metab. 18, 698–711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Louis D. N., Ohgaki H., Wiestler O. D., and Cavenee W. K. (2007) WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System, 4th Ed (Louis D. N., Ohgaki H., Wiestler O. D., and Cavenee W. K., eds) World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland [Google Scholar]
- 19. Singh S. K., Hawkins C., Clarke I. D., Squire J. A., Bayani J., Hide T., Henkelman R. M., Cusimano M. D., and Dirks P. B. (2004) Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature 432, 396–401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Brennan C. W., Verhaak R. G., McKenna A., Campos B., Noushmehr H., Salama S. R., Zheng S., Chakravarty D., Sanborn J. Z., Berman S. H., Beroukhim R., Bernard B., Wu C. J., Genovese G., Shmulevich I., et al. (2013) The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. Cell 155, 462–477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Chakravarti A., Zhai G., Suzuki Y., Sarkesh S., Black P. M., Muzikansky A., and Loeffler J. S. (2004) The prognostic significance of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway activation in human gliomas. J. Clin. Oncol 22, 1926–1933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yang J., Liao D., Wang Z., Liu F., and Wu G. (2011) Mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway contributes to glioma progression and patients' prognosis. J. Surg. Res. 168, 97–102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Korkolopoulou P., Levidou G., El-Habr E. A., Piperi C., Adamopoulos C., Samaras V., Boviatsis E., Thymara I., Trigka E. A., Sakellariou S., Kavantzas N., Patsouris E., and Saetta A. A. (2012) Phosphorylated 4E-binding protein 1 (p-4E-BP1): a novel prognostic marker in human astrocytomas. Histopathology 61, 293–305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Thoreen C. C., Kang S. A., Chang J. W., Liu Q., Zhang J., Gao Y., Reichling L. J., Sim T., Sabatini D. M., and Gray N. S. (2009) An ATP-competitive mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor reveals rapamycin-resistant functions of mTORC1. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 8023–8032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Yamada D., Hoshii T., Tanaka S., Hegazy A. M., Kobayashi M., Tadokoro Y., Ohta K., Ueno M., Ali M. A., and Hirao A. (2014) Loss of Tsc1 accelerates malignant gliomagenesis when combined with oncogenic signals. J. Biochem. 155, 227–233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Soga T., Ohashi Y., Ueno Y., Naraoka H., Tomita M., and Nishioka T. (2003) Quantitative metabolome analysis using capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2, 488–494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Soga T., Baran R., Suematsu M., Ueno Y., Ikeda S., Sakurakawa T., Kakazu Y., Ishikawa T., Robert M., Nishioka T., and Tomita M. (2006) Differential metabolomics reveals ophthalmic acid as an oxidative stress biomarker indicating hepatic glutathione consumption. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 16768–16776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Tanaka S., Nakada M., Yamada D., Nakano I., Todo T., Ino Y., Hoshii T., Tadokoro Y., Ohta K., Ali M. A., Hayashi Y., Hamada J., and Hirao A. (2015) Strong therapeutic potential of γ-secretase inhibitor MRK003 for CD44-high and CD133-low glioblastoma initiating cells. J. Neurooncol. 121, 239–250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Nicholls D. G. (2006) Simultaneous monitoring of ionophore- and inhibitor-mediated plasma and mitochondrial membrane potential changes in cultured neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 14864–14874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Rigobello M. P., Scutari G., Boscolo R., and Bindoli A. (2002) Induction of mitochondrial permeability transition by auranofin, a gold(I)-phosphine derivative. Br. J. Pharmacol. 136, 1162–1168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Managò A., Leanza L., Carraretto L., Sassi N., Grancara S., Quintana-Cabrera R., Trimarco V., Toninello A., Scorrano L., Trentin L., Semenzato G., Gulbins E., Zoratti M., and Szabò I. (2015) Early effects of the antineoplastic agent salinomycin on mitochondrial function. Cell Death Dis. 6, e1930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Zhou Y., Zhou Y., Shingu T., Feng L., Chen Z., Ogasawara M., Keating M. J., Kondo S., and Huang P. (2011) Metabolic alterations in highly tumorigenic glioblastoma cells: preference for hypoxia and high dependency on glycolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 32843–32853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Vlashi E., Lagadec C., Vergnes L., Matsutani T., Masui K., Poulou M., Popescu R., Della Donna L., Evers P., Dekmezian C., Reue K., Christofk H., Mischel P. S., and Pajonk F. (2011) Metabolic state of glioma stem cells and nontumorigenic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 16062–16067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Gupta P. B., Onder T. T., Jiang G., Tao K., Kuperwasser C., Weinberg R. A., and Lander E. S. (2009) Identification of selective inhibitors of cancer stem cells by high-throughput screening. Cell 138, 645–659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Heid M. E., Keyel P. A., Kamga C., Shiva S., Watkins S. C., and Salter R. D. (2013) Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species induces NLRP3-dependent lysosomal damage and inflammasome activation. J. Immunol. 191, 5230–5238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Deng C. C., Liang Y., Wu M. S., Feng F. T., Hu W. R., Chen L. Z., Feng Q. S., Bei J. X., and Zeng Y. X. (2013) Nigericin selectively targets cancer stem cells in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 45, 1997–2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Muñoz-Planillo R., Kuffa P., Martínez-Colon G., Smith B. L., Rajendiran T. M., and Núñez G. (2013) K+ efflux is the common trigger of NLRP3 inflammasome activation by bacterial toxins and particulate matter. Immunity 38, 1142–1153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Tuveson D. A., Shaw A. T., Willis N. A., Silver D. P., Jackson E. L., Chang S., Mercer K. L., Grochow R., Hock H., Crowley D., Hingorani S. R., Zaks T., King C., Jacobetz M. A., Wang L., Bronson R. T., Orkin S. H., DePinho R. A., and Jacks T. (2004) Endogenous oncogenic K-ras(G12D) stimulates proliferation and widespread neoplastic and developmental defects. Cancer Cell 5, 375–387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Serrano M., Lee H., Chin L., Cordon-Cardo C., Beach D., and DePinho R. A. (1996) Role of the INK4a locus in tumor suppression and cell mortality. Cell 85, 27–37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Tamase A., Muraguchi T., Naka K., Tanaka S., Kinoshita M., Hoshii T., Ohmura M., Shugo H., Ooshio T., Nakada M., Sawamoto K., Onodera M., Matsumoto K., Oshima M., Asano M., et al. (2009) Identification of tumor-initiating cells in a highly aggressive brain tumor using promoter activity of nucleostemin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 17163–17168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ikushima H., Todo T., Ino Y., Takahashi M., Miyazawa K., and Miyazono K. (2009) Autocrine TGF-β signaling maintains tumorigenicity of glioma-initiating cells through Sry-related HMG-box factors. Cell Stem Cell 5, 504–514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Hoshii T., Tadokoro Y., Naka K., Ooshio T., Muraguchi T., Sugiyama N., Soga T., Araki K., Yamamura K., and Hirao A. (2012) mTORC1 is essential for leukemia propagation but not stem cell self-renewal. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 2114–2129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]









