Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 24.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2016 Sep 27;17(1):165–178. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.078

Wnt regulates proliferation and neurogenic potential of Müller glial cells through a Lin28/let-7 miRNA-dependent pathway in adult mammalian retina

Kai Yao 1, Suo Qiu 1,4, Lin Tian 5, William D Snider 6, John G Flannery 7, David V Schaffer 7,8, Bo Chen 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC5076887  NIHMSID: NIHMS813655  PMID: 27681429

Abstract

In cold-blooded vertebrates such as zebrafish, Müller glial cells (MGs) readily proliferate to replenish lost retinal neurons. In mammals, however, MGs lack regenerative capability as they do not spontaneously re-enter the cell cycle unless the retina is injured. Here, we show that gene transfer of β-catenin in adult mouse retina activates Wnt signaling and MG proliferation without retinal injury. Upstream of Wnt, deletion of GSK3β stabilizes β-catenin and activates MG proliferation. Downstream of Wnt, β-catenin binds to the Lin28 promoter and activates transcription. Deletion of Lin28 abolishes β-catenin-mediated effects on MG proliferation, and Lin28 gene transfer stimulates MG proliferation. We further demonstrate that let-7 miRNAs are critically involved in Wnt/Lin28-regulated MG proliferation. Intriguingly, a subset of cell cycle reactivated MGs express markers for amacrine cells. Together, these results reveal a key role of Wnt-Lin28-let7 miRNA signaling in regulating proliferation and neurogenic potential of MGs in adult mammalian retina.

In Brief

Müller glial cells (MGs) are a source of retinal stem cells. To overcome proliferation quiescence of MGs in adult mammalian retina, Yao et al. report that modulation of Wnt/Lin28/let-7 miRNA signaling stimulates MG proliferation without retinal injury. A subset of cell cycle reactivated MGs express markers for retinal interneurons.

graphic file with name nihms813655u1.jpg

Introduction

Müller glial cells (MGs) are the primary glial cell type in the vertebrate retina, serving to provide structural support and maintain homeostasis for retinal neurons (Vecino et al., 2015). In cold-blooded vertebrates such as zebrafish, MGs are a source of retinal stem cells to replenish lost retinal neurons (Bernardos et al., 2007; Fausett and Goldman, 2006; Fimbel et al., 2007; Qin et al., 2009; Ramachandran et al., 2010b; Thummel et al., 2008). In mammals, however, MGs do not spontaneously re-enter the cell cycle and therefore they lack regenerative capability (Sahel et al., 1991). Recent studies suggest that the regenerative machinery exists in adult mammalian retina, but injury is required to restore the stem cell status of MGs (Close et al., 2006; Dyer and Cepko, 2000; Karl et al., 2008; Ooto et al., 2004), which is counterproductive for regeneration as it massively kills retinal neurons (Dyer and Cepko, 2000; Karl et al., 2008; Ooto et al., 2004). The molecular nature of injury-induced signals that stimulates MG proliferation in mammals remains poorly understood. We hypothesized that retinal injury may induce signaling events to stimulate MG proliferation and that direct activation of these pathways could allow MGs to re-enter the cell cycle in the absence of injury. Wnt signaling regulates proliferation of adult hippocampal stem cells (Lie et al., 2005). In the adult mammalian retina, injury enhances Wnt signaling and Wnt activation promotes injury-induced MG proliferation (Das et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2013). Canonical Wnt signaling involves the binding of Wnt proteins to Frizzled receptors and activation of Dishevelled, leading to the stabilization and nuclear accumulation of β-catenin, a key effector of Wnt signaling that regulates gene transcription (Logan and Nusse, 2004).

The serine/threonine kinase GSK3 (glycogen synthase kinase 3) regulates Wnt signaling as inhibition of GSK3 leads to increased β-catenin levels (Doble and Woodgett, 2003). Pharmacological studies have implicated GSK3 in the regulation of self-renewal of embryonic stem cells (Sato et al., 2004; Ying et al., 2008). In the developing nervous system, deletion of GSK3 causes excessive proliferation of early neural progenitors while the generation of intermediate neural progenitors and postmitotic neurons is largely suppressed (Kim et al., 2009). Genetic evidence is needed to examine the role of GSK3 in regulating the proliferation of MGs in adult mammalian retina.

Lin28, a RNA-binding protein consisting of Lin28a and Lin28b, has emerged as a master regulator for cell proliferation through inhibition of the biogenesis of let-7 miRNA (microRNA) in embryonic stem cells and cancer cells (Shyh-Chang and Daley, 2013). Several signals upstream of Lin28 have been discovered, including regulation of Lin28a expression by Sox2 based on single-cell expression data analysis during cellular reprogramming (Buganim et al., 2012), and transactivation of Lin28b by c-Myc and NF-κ B in transformed cancer cells (Chang et al., 2009; Iliopoulos et al., 2009). Interestingly, a recent study showed that β-catenin activates the transcription of Lin28a, but not Lin28b, by directly binding to the Lin28a promoter in breast cancer cells (Cai et al., 2013), providing evidence that Wnt signaling may directly regulate Lin28a expression to control cancer cell proliferation. Beyond the studies in cancer cells, how Wnt/β-catenin signaling might interact with Lin28/let-7 to regulate cell proliferation in progenitor/stem cells is largely unknown.

In the present study, we characterized Wnt as an injury-induced signaling event for stimulating the proliferative response of MGs in the adult mammalian retina. Cell-type-specific gene transfer of β-catenin is sufficient to stimulate MG proliferation in vivo without retinal injury. GSK3β regulates Wnt signaling through phosphorylation of β-catenin, targeting it for proteasome degradation (Cohen and Frame, 2001). Deletion of GSK3β resulted in β-catenin stabilization and MG proliferation without retinal injury. Importantly, we found that β-catenin activates the transcription of Lin28a and Lin28b by binding to the cis-regulatory elements of their promoters, and that Lin28/let-7 miRNAs play an important role downstream of Wnt in regulating MG proliferation. Intriguingly, after gene transfer of β-catenin or Lin28, a subset of cell cycle reactivated MGs express markers for amacrine cells, a type of retinal interneurons.

Results

Neurotoxic injury leads to transient proliferation of MGs in adult mouse retina

To examine MG proliferation induced by neurotoxic injury in the adult mammalian retina, we injected 200 nmol NMDA into the vitreous chamber of the mouse retina at 4 weeks of age. This NMDA dose results in retinal injury and MG proliferation in adult rat and mouse retina (Karl et al., 2008; Ooto et al., 2004). We used anti-HuC/D immunohistochemistry to assay the time course of NMDA-induced cell death in the ganglion cell layer (GCL). Retinal ganglion and amacrine cells were progressively lost with only ~45% of HuC/D+ cells remaining 36 hours post-injury (Figure S1). To assay cell proliferation, we injected 1μl of 1 mg/ml of EdU into the vitreous chamber 5 hours before tissue collection at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 96 hours post-NMDA injection, and quantified the number of EdU+ cells/mm2 in retinal flatmount preparations. No EdU incorporation was detected at 24 hours until a small number (4.7 ± 0.8) of EdU+ cells appeared 36 hours post-NMDA injection. This number continued to increase, reaching 264.5 ± 8.4 at 60 hours, before it was reduced to 5.8 ± 1.1 at 72 hours post-NMDA injection (Figure 1A). The EdU+ cells were also CyclinD3 and p27kip1 positive (Figure 1B), MG-specific nuclear antigens (Dyer and Cepko, 2000). Our results indicate that NMDA-induced neurotoxic injury transiently stimulated MG proliferation in a time window of 36–72 hours after injury.

Figure 1. Neurotoxic injury activates Wnt signaling and MG proliferation.

Figure 1

(A) A time course analysis of MG proliferation by scoring the number of EdU+ cells/mm2 on retinal flatmount preparations following NMDA-induced neurotoxic injury. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. (B) Representative images of EdU detection/anti-CyclinD3 or EdU detection/anti-p27kip1 immunohistochemistry at each time point. Arrow heads: EdU+ cells were double positive for CyclinD3 or p27kip1 immunoreactivity. Scale bar: 25 μm. (C) A time course analysis of the RNA levels for Wnt genes, Wnt antagonists Dkk1 and WIF-1, and (D) Wnt target genes following NMDA-induced neurotoxic injury. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. (E) MGs are visualized as tdTomato+ cells in Rosa26-tdTomato reporter mice. ONL: outer nuclear layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; GCL: ganglion cell layer. (F) The RNA levels for Wnt genes, Wnt antagonists Dkk1 and WIF-1 in FACS-purified MGs and non-MGs at 18 hours after neurotoxic injury. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ***p<0.001, Student’s t test. (G) The RNA levels for Wnt target genes in FACS-purified MGs and non-MGs at 18 hours after neurotoxic injury. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, Student’s t test. (H, I) Inhibition of Wnt signaling suppresses neurotoxic injury-induced MG proliferation. In comparison to NMDA treatment alone, Wnt inhibitor XAV939 treatment significantly reduced the number of EdU+ 60 hours after NMDA injection. Scale bar: 50 μm. (J) Quantification of EdU+ cells after XAV939 treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. ***p<0.001, Student’s t test.

Neurotoxic injury activates Wnt signaling leading to MG proliferation

To examine whether Wnt signaling is activated by NMDA-induced neurotoxic injury, we performed quantitative PCR to assay the RNA levels of Wnt genes at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 hours post-NMDA injection, relative to the PBS injected retina as a control. Several Wnt genes, including Wnt2b, Wnt8a, Wnt8b, Wnt9a, and Wnt10a, were upregulated at least 3-fold between 6–24 hours post-injury (Figure 1C). Dkk1, a Wnt signaling antagonist, was downregulated to 13.2 ± 0.6% of the control 24 hours post-injury (Figure 1C). The RNA levels for WIF-1, a secreted protein that binds to Wnt proteins and inhibits their activities (Hsieh et al., 1999), were also reduced to 1.6 ± 0.2% of the control 12 hours post-injury (Figure 1C). The upregulation of Wnt genes and concomitant downregulation of WIF-1 and Dkk1 would predict activation of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Indeed, 24 hours post-injury, we detected a 3.4-fold upregulation of CyclinD1 (Ccnd1, Figure 1D), a target gene of Wnt signaling (Shtutman et al., 1999; Tetsu and McCormick, 1999) and key regulator of the cell cycle progression from the G1 to S phase (Resnitzky et al., 1994). We also detected significant upregulation of Lef1 and Axin2 (Figure 1D), two other Wnt target genes (Filali et al., 2002; Hovanes et al., 2001). Our results indicate that NMDA-induced neurotoxic injury led to activation of Wnt signaling, which preceded MG proliferation.

To examine whether NMDA-induced Wnt activation is a cell-autonomous response of MGs, we generated a MG-specific reporter mouse line by crossing the GFAP-Cre line to the Rosa26-tdTomato reporter line (Kuzmanovic et al., 2003; Madisen et al., 2010), resulting in cell-type-specific labeling of MGs with tdTomato (Figure 1E), and used fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to isolate tdTomato+ MGs after NMDA treatment. The RNA levels for Wnt genes and Wnt antagonists were assayed in tdTomato+ MGs and the non-MG population at 18 hours post-injury. While the RNAs levels for Wnt genes (Wnt2b, Wnt8a, Wnt8b, Wnt9a, and Wnt10a) and Wnt antagonists (Dkk1 and WIF-1) remained largely unchanged in the non-MG group, even greater fold changes were detected for these genes in MGs (Figure 1F). Robust activation of Wnt target genes (CyclinD1, Lef1, and Axin2) was also detected in MGs (Figure 1G).

We next examined whether inhibition of Wnt signaling could suppress NMDA-induced MG proliferation. We co-injected NMDA with XAV939, a selective Wnt signaling antagonist (Huang et al., 2009), and quantified the number of EdU+ cells per mm2 in retinal flatmount preparations 60 hours post-injection, when the maximum number of EdU+ cells were detected (Figure 1A). The number of EdU+ cells was significantly reduced when Wnt signaling was inhibited by XAV939 relative to NMDA injection alone (Figures 1H–1J). Taken together, our results indicate that Wnt is an injury-induced signal to stimulate MG proliferation.

Gene transfer of β-catenin stimulates MG proliferation without retinal injury

To develop a MG-specific gene transfer method, we modified an adeno-associated virus (AAV) variant, known as ShH10 (Klimczak et al., 2009; Koerber et al., 2009), by replacing the ubiquitous CAG promoter with the MG-specific promoter GFAP (Kuzmanovic et al., 2003). ShH10-CAG-mediated gene transfer of the green fluorescence protein (GFP), via intravitreal injections in adult mice, resulted in transgene expression predominantly in MGs as well as a subset of retinal ganglion cells and amacrine cells labeled by NeuN immunoreactivity (Figures S2A–S2C). By contrast, ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer was highly specific for MGs as GFP expression was not detected in retinal ganglion cells or amacrine cells (Figures S2D–S2F). In addition, ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer was highly efficient to transduce many MGs (Figures S2G–S2O). We further dissociated ShH10-GFAP-GFP infected retinas into single cells and analyze the percentage of GFP+ cells that express MG-specific nuclear antigens CyclinD3 and p27kip1. Out of 524 GFP+ cells analyzed from 6 retinas, all of them (100%) were immunoreactive for CyclinD3 or p27kip1 (data not shown), indicating that ShH10-GFAP may only transduce MGs.

Previous reports indicate that retinal injury is a prerequisite to stimulate the proliferative response of MGs in adult mammalian retina. We next examined whether activation of Wnt signaling, without retinal injury, is sufficient to stimulate MG proliferation using ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer of wild-type β-catenin. To assess the activation of the canonical Wnt pathway, we made a ShH10-Wnt reporter in which the GFP reporter gene is driven by Tcf/Lef-mediated transcriptional activation. Two weeks after viral infection in the adult mouse retina, significant activation of the reporter gene was observed in MGs co-infected with ShH10-GFAP-β-catenin, in comparison to those infected with the ShH10-Wnt reporter alone (Figures S3A and S3B). A time course study showed that Wnt target genes were activated following gene transfer of β-catenin in MGs in comparison to ShH10-GFAP-GFP infected retinas as a control (Figure S3C). To examine whether Wnt activation leads to MG proliferation, we analyzed EdU incorporation following ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer of wild-type β-catenin in adult mouse retina at 4 weeks of age. Intravitreal injection of EdU was performed 10 days post-viral infection, and the treated retinas were collected 4 days later for analysis. EdU+ cells were detected in retinal sections co-labeled by immunohistochemistry for MG-specific antigens including glutamine synthetase (Figures 2A–2F), CyclinD3 (Figures 2G–2L), and p27kip1 (Figures 2M–2R). Many EdU+ cells were detected following β-catenin gene transfer, indicating that these cells re-entered the cell cycle. The nuclear-localizing EdU signals were surrounded by the MG cytoplasm labeled by glutamine synthetase immunoreactivity (Figure 2F), and were co-localized with MG nuclear antigens CyclinD3 (Figure 2L) or p27kip1 (Figure 2R). In these co-labeling experiments, all EdU+ cells were positive for MG-specific antigens, indicating that the proliferating cells were MGs. Noticeably, when MGs re-entered the cell cycle, their somas migrated along their radial processes instead of being localized in the middle of the inner nuclear layer (INL) as they normally do. A quantitative analysis (Figure 2Y) showed that the EdU+ cells were unevenly distributed in retinal layers, with a majority of them (66.2 ± 2.1%) migrating to the outer nuclear layer (ONL) where photoreceptors are localized. The migration of cell cycle reactivated MGs to the ONL was further confirmed by ShH10-GFAP-β-catenin infection in the MG-specific reporter mice (Figure 1E), where EdU signals were detected in the tdTomato+ MGs in the ONL (Figures 2S–2X). As a result of Wnt-induced cell proliferation, more CyclinD3+ MGs were present relative to the untreated retina (Figure 2Z).

Figure 2. MGs re-enter the cell cycle following ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer of β-catenin without retinal injury.

Figure 2

(A–R) Analysis of EdU incorporation by immunohistochemistry co-labeling for MG-specific antigens: glutamine synthase (GS in A–F), CyclinD3 (G–L), and p27kip1 (M–R). The boxed areas in (B), (H), and (N) are enlarged in (D–F), (J–L), and (P–R), respectively. Arrow heads in (F), (L), and (R) show that EdU signals were detected specifically in MGs. (S–X) EdU incorporation in the MG- specific reporter mice. The boxed area in (T) is enlarged in (V–X). Arrow heads in (X) show that the EdU signals were detected in the tdTomato-labeled MGs in the ONL. (Y) Distribution of EdU+ cells in retinal layers. ONL: outer nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; IPL: inner plexiform layer; GCL: ganglion cell layer. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 38. (Z) Anti-CyclinD3 immunohistochemistry in untreated and β-catenin treated retinas at 2 weeks after viral infection. The number of CyclinD3+ cells was quantified per 100μm in retinal sections. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. Scale bars in (C, O, I, and U): 25 μm; Scale bars in (F, R, L, and X): 10 μm. Scale bars in (Z): 20 μm.

Characterization of cell cycle progression, distribution and efficiency of MG proliferation following β-catenin gene transfer

EdU is incorporated into the newly synthesized DNA during the S phase of the cell cycle. To examine the progression of EdU-labeled MGs through other active phases of the cell cycle, we performed co-labeling experiments (Figure S4) for EdU detection and immunohistochemical analysis of cell proliferation antigens: Ki67 (Figures S4A–S4D) and phosphohistone H3 (PH3) (Figures S4E–S4H), expressed in the active phases (G1, S, G2, and Mitosis) of the cell cycle for Ki67 (Scholzen and Gerdes, 2000), and late G2 and the actual phases of Mitosis for PH3 (Hendzel et al., 1997). We quantified the percentage of Ki67 or PH3 positive cells that were also EdU positive, and vice versa (Figure S4I). While the vast majority of Ki67 or PH3 positive cells were EdU positive, only a small portion of EdU positive cells were positive for Ki67 or PH3, indicating that most EdU+ MGs did not proceed to the later phases of the cell cycle in the 4-day time frame between EdU injection and tissue collection.

To further analyze the efficiency and distribution pattern of MG proliferation following β-catenin gene transfer, we examined EdU-labeled cells in retinal flatmount preparations. In the ShH10-GFAP-GFP infected retina as a control, neither the viral infection nor the injection procedure itself led to cell proliferation (Figures 3A and 3B). By contrast, many MGs re-entered the cell cycle in the β-catenin treated retina, labeled by ShH10-GFAP-GFP co-infection (Figures 3C and 3D). We quantified the number of EdU+ cells/mm2 in four retinal quadrants (dorsal, ventral, temporal, and nasal) at three distances (700, 1400, and 2100 μm) from the center of the retina (Figure 3E). Although the number of EdU+ cells in each of the four quadrants was not significantly different from one another as long as their distance from the center remained the same, it appeared that there was a slight gradient of an increasing number of EdU+ cells from the center to the periphery (Figure 3F). Our results show that Wnt activation was highly efficient to stimulate MG proliferation in an uninjured retina.

Figure 3. ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer of β-catenin is highly efficient to stimulate MG proliferation in adult mouse retina.

Figure 3

(A, B) ShH10-GFAP-GFP infection itself did not lead to detection of EdU+ cells in the whole retina. (C, D) Many MGs reentered the cell cycle two weeks after ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer of β-catenin and GFP (co-infection marker). (E) The number of EdU+ cells/mm2 in each of the four retinal quadrants (Dorsal, Ventral, Nasal, and Temporal) was quantified at 700 μm, 1400 μm, and 2100 μm from the center of the retina. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 21. (F) Quantification of the number of EdU+ cells/mm2 at different distances from the center of the retina. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 21. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001, Student’s t test. Scale bar: 1 mm. (G-I) Two weeks after ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer of β-catenin and GFP (co-infection marker), retinas were dissociated for EdU incorporation analysis. Arrowheads: GFP+ cells that were also EdU+. Scale bar: 20 μm.

EdU incorporation assay can only label a small fraction of cell cycle reactivated MGs when they are proceeding through the S phase of the cell cycle at the time of EdU injection. After retinal dissociation, we quantified the number of EdU+ cells as a percentage of all Wnt-activated MGs labeled by ShH10-GFAP-GFP co-infection (Figures 3G–3I). As expected, all EdU+ cells were GFP+. However, only ~8% of GFP+ cells were labeled by EdU, indicating that the majority of Wnt-activated MGs were not at the S phase of the cell cycle at the time of EdU injection. Interestingly, gene transfer of a dominant active form of β-catenin did not result in a significant increase in MG proliferation relative to wild-type β-catenin (data not shown).

GSK3β deletion stimulates MG proliferation without retinal injury

GSK3β regulates Wnt signaling by phosphorylation of β-catenin, resulting in its degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (Logan and Nusse, 2004). To investigate whether GSK3β plays a role in regulating Wnt signaling and MG proliferation in adult mammalian retina, we deleted GSk3β by infecting GSK3βloxp/loxp mice at 4 weeks of age with ShH10-GFAP-Cre. In comparison to GSK3βloxp/loxp mice infected with ShH10-GFAP-tdTomato as a control (Figures S5A–S5F), deletion of GSK3β resulted in stabilization and nuclear accumulation of β-catenin in MGs, labeled by ShH10-GFAP-tdTomato co-infection (Figures S5G–S5L). To further assess whether GSK3β deletion activates Wnt signaling, we infected GSK3βloxp/loxp mouse retina with ShH10-GFAP-Cre and the ShH10-Wnt reporter. In comparison to GSK3βloxp/loxp mice infected with the ShH10-Wnt reporter alone (Figure S5M), significant activation of the reporter gene was observed 2 weeks after ShH10-GFAP-Cre co-injection (Figure S5N).

In zebrafish, pharmacological inhibition of GSK3β leads to β-catenin stabilization and MG proliferation (Ramachandran et al., 2011). In cultured mouse retinal explants, GSK3 inhibitor treatment enhances MG proliferation in SvJ129 mice (Suga et al., 2014). To investigate whether GSK3β deletion is sufficient to stimulate MG proliferation without retinal injury, we assayed EdU incorporation in the GSK3βloxp/loxp mouse retina infected with ShH10-GFAP-Cre at 4 weeks of age. While no EdU signal was detected in the GSK3βloxp/loxp mouse retina with sham injection (Figures S6A–S6C and S6G–S6I), many EdU+ cells were detected two weeks after ShH10-GFAP-Cre injection, co-labeled by immunohistochemistry for CyclinD3 (Figures S6D–S6F) and p27kip1 (Figures S6J–S6L). Our results demonstrate that GSK3β deletion is sufficient to stimulate MG proliferation without retinal injury.

Wnt regulates Lin28 expression through transcriptional activation in MGs

The pluripotency factor Lin28 is highly expressed in mammalian embryonic stem cells and cancer cells (Moss and Tang, 2003). Lin28 was used together with Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog to reprogram human somatic fibroblasts to pluripotent stem cells (Yu et al., 2007). In zebrafish, Lin28 regulates MG proliferation in response to retinal injury (Ramachandran et al., 2010a). To determine the role of Lin28 in MG proliferation in mammals, we first examined whether Wnt signaling regulates Lin28 expression by analyzing Lin28 RNA levels following gene transfer of β-catenin in adult mouse retina. In comparison to ShH10-GFAP-GFP infection as a control, the RNA levels for both Lin28a and Lin28b were significantly upregulated at two weeks after ShH10-GFAP-β-catenin infection (Figure S7A). We further assessed Lin28 protein levels using immunohistochemistry in retinal sections. In the ShH10-GFAP-GFP infected retina as a control, Lin28a (Figures S7B-S7D) or Lin28b (Figures S7H–S7J) was not detected. By contrast, ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer of β-catenin resulted in detection of Lin28a (Figures S7E–S7G) and Lin28b (Figures S7K–S7M) in MGs, labeled by ShH10-GFAP-GFP co-infection. Our results indicate that Wnt activation induces the expression of both Lin28a and Lin28b in adult mouse MGs.

To determine whether Lin28 is a direct transcriptional target of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, we cloned a 3kb promoter sequence of the mouse Lin28 to drive the expression of a GFP reporter, namely Lin28a-GFP and Lin28b-GFP. We first tested the promoter activity in HEK293T cells transfected with Lin28a-GFP or Lin28b-GFP and CAG-tdTomato (a transfection marker), with or without a Flag-tagged β-catenin. In the absence of β-catenin, the reporter gene expression was barely detectable for either Lin28a-GFP (Figures S8A–S8C) or Lin28b-GFP (Figures S8J–S8L). In the presence of β-catenin, however, the reporter gene expression markedly increased for both Lin28a (Figures S8D–S8F) and Lin28b (Figures S8M–S8O). To further examine whether β-Catenin activates Lin28a and Lin28b transcription by direct binding to their promoters as a co-activator of LEF/TCF in the canonical Wnt/β-Catenin pathway, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays in HEK293T cells transfected with an expression vector encoding a Flag-tagged β-catenin or a Flag-tagged GFP as a control, together with the Lin28 promoter construct. Analysis of multiple independent clones from the ChIP assay using an anti-Flag antibody revealed β-catenin-specific binding to both Lin28a and Lin28b promoters, proximally located within 500 bp upstream of the ATG start codon. Examination of the proximal promoter sequences using MatInspector (Cartharius et al., 2005) led to the identification of two putative β-catenin binding sites for Lin28a (Figure S8S) and Lin28b (Figure S8T), which were confirmed by additional ChIP assay experiments using primers flanking the putative binding sites for Lin28a (Figure S8U) and Lin28b (Figure S8V). To further validate these binding sites, we generated Lin28-GFP reporter constructs with the binding sites mutated (Figures S8S and S8T), dubbed Lin28amut-GFP and Lin28bmut-GFP. Mutation of these binding sites abolished β-catenin-activated reporter gene expression for Lin28a (Figures S8G–S8I and S8W) and Lin28b (Figures S8P–S8R and S8X). Taken together, our results demonstrate that β-catenin activates the transcription of Lin28a and Lin28b through binding to the cis-regulatory elements of their promoters.

To further test whether β-catenin activates the promoters of Lin28a and Lin28b in MGs, we infected adult mouse retinas at 4 weeks of age with ShH10-Lin28a-GFP or ShH10-Lin28b-GFP, in the presence or absence of ShH10-GFAP-β-catenin co-infection. Two weeks after viral infection, the reporter gene expression was detected only in the presence of β-catenin for Lin28a (Figures 4A–4F) and Lin28b (Figures 4J–4O). Mutation of the β-catenin binding sites abolished the reporter gene expression for Lin28a (Figures 4G–4I) and Lin28b (Figures 4P–4R). The binding of β-catenin to the Lin28 promoters was further confirmed by ChIP assays using viral infected retinal tissues for Lin28a (Figure 4S) and Lin28b (Figure 4T).

Figure 4. Wnt/β-Catenin transactivates Lin28a and Lin28b in MGs in adult mouse retina.

Figure 4

(A-F) Lin28a-GFP reporter analysis in retinas infected with ShH10-GFAP-tdTomato (infection marker), in the absence (A–C) or presence (D–F) of ShH10-GFAP-β-catenin co-infection. (G–I) Mutation of the β-catenin binding sites in the Lin28a promoter abolished the reporter activity. (J–O) Lin28b-GFP reporter analysis in retinas infected with ShH10-GFAP-tdTomato (infection marker), in the absence (J–L) or presence (M–O) of ShH10-GFAP-β-catenin co-infection. (P–R) Mutation of the β-catenin binding sites on the Lin28b promoter abolished the reporter activity. Scale bars: 20 μm. (S, T) ChIP analysis reveals direct binding of β-catenin to the Lin28a (S) or the Lin28b (T) promoter. Adult mouse retinas were infected with ShH10-Lin28-GFP or Lin28mut-GFP, in the presence or absence of ShH10-GFAP-β-Catenin co-infection. Chromatin, immunoprecipitated with an antibody specific to β-Catenin, was assayed by PCR with primers flanking the putative β-catenin binding sites 1 and 2.

Lin28 plays an essential role in controlling MG proliferation via let-7 miRNAs

As a direct transcriptional target of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, we decided to examine the role of Lin28 in MG proliferation. To determine whether gene transfer of Lin28 is sufficient to stimulate MG proliferation without retinal injury, we performed EdU incorporation analysis of adult mouse retinas infected with ShH10-GFAP-Lin28a (Figure 5A) or ShH10-GFAP-Lin28b (Figure 5B). Two weeks after viral infection, many MGs reentered the cell cycle with greater than 1000 EdU+ cells per mm2 at 1400 μm from the retinal center in Lin28a or Lin28b infected retinas, a robust effect relative to β-catenin gene transfer or GSK3β deletion (Figure 5C). We next investigated whether Lin28 is required for β-catenin-induced MG proliferation by co-deletion of Lin28a and Lin28b in Lin28aloxp/loxp; Lin28bloxp/loxp double floxed mice. MG proliferation induced by gene transfer of β-catenin was largely neutralized in ShH10-GFAP-Cre infected retinas (Figures 5D–5F). We next examined whether Lin28 plays a role in NMDA-induced MG proliferation. Lin28aloxp/loxp; Lin28bloxp/loxp double floxed mice were infected with ShH10-GFAP-Cre two weeks before NMDA injection. EdU was administered 5 hours before tissue collection at 60 hours post-NMDA injection. The number of EdU+ MGs induced by NMDA damage was largely reduced when Lin28a and Lin28b were co-deleted (Figures 5G–5I). These results demonstrate that Lin28 serves as a key molecular switch downstream of the canonical Wnt pathway to regulate MG proliferation in both injured and uninjured retinas.

Figure 5. Lin28 plays an essential role in MG proliferation in adult mouse retina.

Figure 5

(A–C) Lin28 is sufficient to stimulate MG proliferation without retinal injury. ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer of Lin28a (A) or Lin28b (B) led to proliferative response of MGs, analyzed by EdU incorporation and quantified (C) in comparison to β-catenin gene transfer and GSK3β deletion. (D–F) Co-deletion of Lin28a and Lin28b abolishes β-catenin-induced MG proliferation, Lin28aloxp/loxp; Lin28bloxp/loxp double floxed mice were infected with ShH10-GFAP-β-catenin, in the absence (D) or presence (E) of ShH10-GFAP-Cre co-infection. MG proliferation was analyzed and quantified (F) by EdU incorporation. (G-I) Co-deletion of Lin28a and Lin28b largely suppresses NMDA-induced MG proliferation. Lin28aloxp/loxp; Lin28bloxp/loxp double floxed mice were infected with ShH10-GFAP-GFP (G) or ShH10-GFAP-Cre (H) two weeks before NMDA damage. MG proliferation was analyzed and quantified (I) by EdU incorporation. Scale bars: 50 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. ***p<0.001, Student’s t test.

Lin28 plays a central role in regulating proliferative growth of cancer cells and embryonic stem cells through inhibition of posttranscriptional maturation of let-7 miRNAs (Heo et al., 2008; Newman et al., 2008; Rybak et al., 2008; Viswanathan et al., 2008). let-7 miRNAs suppress cell proliferation pathways through mRNA degradation or translation inhibition of a network of cell-cycle regulators (Shyh-Chang and Daley, 2013). Therefore, Lin28 promotes cell proliferation through let-7 repression (Viswanathan et al., 2009). As a further downstream effector of Wnt signaling, we first examined whether Wnt activation regulate let-7 miRNA levels using quantitative PCR assays. As expected, ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer of Lin28a or Lin28b in the adult mouse retina, compared to ShH10-GFAP-GFP infection as a control, led to a significant reduction in let-7a, 7b, and 7f miRNA levels two weeks after viral infection (Figure 6A). Significantly, a marked decrease in let-7a, 7b, and 7f miRNA levels was also observed in retinas infected by ShH10-GFAP-β-catenin (Figure 6A). To determine whether β-catenin-induced downregulation of let-7 miRNAs is mediated by Lin28, we co-deleted Lin28a and Lin28b by injection of ShH10-GFAP-Cre together with ShH10-GFAP-β-catenin in Lin28aloxp/loxp; Lin28bloxp/loxp double floxed mice. Co-deletion of Lin28a and Lin28b largely neutralized β-catenin-mediated effects on let-7 miRNA downregulation (Figure 6B), indicating that Wnt/β-catenin acts through Lin28 to regulate let-7 miRNA expression. To determine whether Wnt/Lin28-regulated let-7 miRNA expression occurs in MGs, we constructed a let-7 miRNA-responsive GFP sensor, with 3 perfectly complementary let-7 binding sites inserted in the 3’-UTR of the GFP sensor (Cimadamore et al., 2013; Rybak et al., 2008), and packaged it into ShH10-GFAP for MG-specific delivery. In the viral transduction area labeled by ShH10-GFAP-tdTomato co-infection, the GFP sensor expression was barely detectable, indicating a high level of let-7 miRNAs in MGs to suppress proliferation under normal conditions (Figures S9A–S9C). As expected, co-infection with ShH10-GFAP-Lin28a (Figures S9D–S9F) or ShH10-GFAP-Lin28b (Figures S9G–S9I) activated the GFP sensor in MGs. Significantly, ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer of β-catenin also activated the GFP senor in MGs (Figures S9J–S9L).

Figure 6. Wnt/β-catenin acts through let-7 miRNAs to regulate MG proliferation.

Figure 6

(A) ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer of β-catenin downregulates let-7a, let-7b, and let-7f miRNA levels in the adult mouse retina. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ***p<0.001, Student’s t test. (B) Co-deletion of Lin28a and Lin28b largely neutralizes β-catenin-induced suppression of let-7a, let-7b, and let-7f miRNAs. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ***p<0.001, One-way ANOVA analysis. (C–E) Co-expression of let-7b miRNA abolishes β-Catenin-mediated effects on MG proliferation, analyzed and quantified (E) by EdU incorporation. Scale bar: 25 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. ***p<0.001, Student’s t test.

To examine whether let-7 miRNA is critically involved in Wnt/β-catenin-mediated effects on MG proliferation, we co-expressed let-7b miRNA with β-catenin in MGs using ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer in the adult mouse retina at 4 weeks of age, and observed that β-catenin-induced MG proliferation was largely suppressed (Figures 6C–6E). Taken together, our results delineate a key role of the Wnt/Lin28/let-7 signaling module in regulating the proliferative response of MGs in adult mouse retina.

Neurogenic potential of cell cycle reactivated MGs

To analyze the fates of cell cycle reactivated MGs, we injected EdU at 10 days after ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer of β-catenin, Lin28a, or Lin28b in the 4-week-old adult mouse retina, and quantified the number of EdU+ at 4, 7, and 10 days after EdU injection. Although many EdU+ cells were scored per mm2 in retinas treated with β-catenin (970.3 ± 40), Lin28a (1325.3 ± 64.4), or Lin28b (1177.3 ± 94.2) at 4 days after EdU injection, the number of EdU+ cells declined over time for all three treatment groups with only a small number of EdU+ cells remaining at 10 days after EdU injection (Figure S10). Our results are consistent with the previous report that the majority of cell cycle reactivated MGs die, resulting in a time-dependent decrease in the number of BrdU labeled cells (Ooto et al., 2004). To examine the neurogenic potential of cell cycle reactivated MGs, we analyzed whether EdU+ cells express cell-type-specific markers after retinal dissociation at 4 days after EdU injection in retinas infected with ShH10-GFAP-β-catenin, Lin28a, or Lin28b. We did not detect the expression of markers for rods (rhodopsin), cones (red/green or blue cone opsins), bipolar cells (PKCα), and ganglion cells (Tuj1 or Brn3) in EdU+ cells in the three treatment groups (data not shown). Intriguingly, a small number of EdU+ cells were immunoreactive for amacrine cell markers (Figure 7). In β-catenin-treated retinas (Figures 7A–7C and 7J), 33.1 ± 4.3% of EdU+ cells were positive for Pax6 (progenitors and amacrine cells), 6.5 ± 1.5% were positive for Syntaxin1 (amacrine cells), and 6.0 ± 0.9% were positive for NeuN (amacrine and ganglion cells). In Lin28a-treated retinas (Figures 7D–7F and 7J), 51.0 ± 4.0% of EdU+ cells were positive for Pax6, 6.1 ± 1.1% were positive for Syntaxin1, and 5.1 ± 1.0% were positive for NeuN. In Lin28b-treated retinas (Figures, 7G-7I and 7J), 49.5 ± 2.6% of EdU+ cells were positive for Pax6, 5.5 ± 0.9% were positive for Syntaxin1, and 5.9 ± 2.0% were positive for NeuN. Using confocal microscopy in intact retina, we further confirmed the expression of amacrine cell markers in a small subset of cell cycle reactivated MGs located in the lower part of the inner nuclear layer where amacrine cell somas are located, following ShH10-GFAP-mediated gene transfer of β-catenin, Lin28a, or Lin28b (Figure S11). Our results signify neurogenic potential of Wnt/Lin28-activated MGs in adult mammalian retina.

Figure 7. A subset of cell cycle reactivated MGs express markers for amacrine cells.

Figure 7

Adult mouse retinas were treated with EdU at 10 days after infection with ShH10-GFAP-β-Catenin, Lin28a, or Lin28b. Treated retinas were dissociated 4 days after EdU treatment and analyzed for EdU incorporation and immunohistochemistry for amacrine cell markers: Pax6, Syntaxin1, and NeuN. (A–C) Co-detection of EdU and the expression of amacrine cell markers in ShH10-GFAP-β-catenin infected retinas. (D–F) Co-detection of EdU and the expression of amacrine cell markers in ShH10-GFAP- Lin28a infected retinas. (G–I) Co-detection of EdU and the expression of amacrine cell markers in ShH10-GFAP-Lin28b infected retinas. Arrows: EdU positive but marker negative cells. Arrow heads: cells double positive for EdU and marker. Scale bars: 40 μm. (J) Statistical analysis of the percentage of EdU+ cells that were also Pax6+, Syntaxin1+ or NeuN+. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4.

Discussion

Previous studies have indicated that retinal injury is required for restoring the stem/progenitor cell status of adult mammalian MGs, evidenced by cell cycle re-entry (Close et al., 2006; Dyer and Cepko, 2000; Karl et al., 2008; Osakada et al., 2007; Takeda et al., 2008; Wan et al., 2008; Wan et al., 2007). However, neurotoxin-induced retinal injury inevitably causes death of amacrine and ganglion cells, and therefore is counterproductive to the aim of restoring regenerative capabilities in the mammalian retina. An injury-free strategy that would not necessitate inflicting a further damage to a diseased retina is highly desirable. We found that retinal injury elicited a transient activation of Wnt signaling, prior to the proliferative response of MGs. Activation of Wnt signaling was manifested by an upregulation of multiple Wnt genes, downregulation of Wnt antagonists Dkk1 and WIF-1, and transcriptional activation of Wnt target genes (Ccnd1, Lef1, and Axin2). Furthermore, Pharmacological Inhibition of Wnt signaling by XAV939 significantly reduced injury-induced MG proliferation. Consistent with studies in zebrafish that demonstrate that Wnt plays an indispensable role in injury-induced proliferation of MG-derived retinal progenitors (Ramachandran et al., 2011; Wan et al., 2014), our results indicate that Wnt is a conserved pathway for MG proliferation in mammals.

To directly activate Wnt signaling without retinal injury, we developed a MG-specific gene transfer tool (ShH10-GFAP) to deliver wild-type β-catenin and observed a robust proliferative response of MGs that was equivalent to retinal injury in combination with mitogenic growth factor treatment (Karl et al., 2008). In addition to the high efficiency in stimulating MG proliferation, targeting the intracellular signaling pathway(s) of MGs also eliminates the need for a global treatment of the entire retina with growth factors, which could cause undesirable side effects from untargeted cells. GSK3 regulates Wnt signaling by promoting β-catenin degradation. GSK3 plays an important role in the maintenance and self-renewal of human and mouse embryonic stem cells (Bone et al., 2009; Sato et al., 2004; Ying et al., 2008). Genetic evidence is required to determine whether GSK3 participates in regulating the progenitor/stem cell status of MGs in mammals. Our study showed that deletion of GSK3β resulted in β-catenin stabilization and MG proliferation without injury. Controlling GSK3β kinase activity appears to be an additional regulatory mechanism that tunes the proliferative response of MGs in adult mammalian retina.

Lin28 has emerged as a master control gene that defines “stemness” in multiple tissue lineages (Shyh-Chang and Daley, 2013). As an RNA-binding protein, Lin28 represses let-7 miRNA biogenesis, and thus regulates the self-renewal of mammalian embryonic stem cells. Upstream factors regulating Lin28 remain largely unexplored relative to the effectors and targets downstream of Lin28/let-7 miRNAs. In breast cancer cells, Wnt/β-catenin binds to the promoter of Lin28a, but not Lin28b, and activates its transcription (Cai et al., 2013). We found that gene transfer of β-catenin in MGs induced the expression of both Lin28a and Lin28b. Using ChIP assays, we identified distinct β-catenin binding sites in the proximal region of Lin28a and Lin28b promoters that are critical for transcriptional activation. Mutation of these binding sites abolished β-catenin-induced Lin28a and Lin28b promoter activity. Interestingly, the two β-catenin binding sites in the Lin28a promoter we identified are different from the one reported for augmenting cancer cell expansion (Cai et al., 2013), suggesting that distinct β-catenin binding sites may be used to drive Lin28a transcription in progenitor/stem cells. We further demonstrate that Lin28a and Lin28b are essential factors in regulating MG proliferation in vivo, as gene transfer of Lin28a or Lin28b was sufficient to stimulate MG proliferation; and co-deletion of Lin28a and Lin28b abolished β-catenin-induced MG proliferation. Navigating downstream, β-catenin suppressed let-7 miRNA expression, and co-deletion of Lin28a and Lin28b neutralized β-catenin-mediated effects on let-7 miRNA expression, indicating that Wnt/β-catenin acts through Lin28 to suppress let-7 miRNA biogenesis. Importantly, let-7 miRNA regulation is functionally relevant for Wnt-activated MG proliferation as β-catenin-mediated proliferation effects were suppressed by let-7b miRNA co-expression.

Previous studies in mice used retinal injury, in combination with growth factor treatment (Karl et al., 2008) or transgenic expression of the proneural transcription factor Ascl1 (Ueki et al., 2015), to stimulate MG proliferation, reprogramming these cells to a neurogenic competent state. The neurogenic competence of cell cycle reactivated MGs after injury decreases in an age-dependent manner (Loffler et al., 2015). Without retinal injury, a subset of MGs migrated to the lower part of the inner nuclear layer and expressed amacrine cell markers after gene transfer of β-catenin, Lin28a, or Lin28b. Taken together, our results provide compelling evidence that GSK3-Wnt-Lin28-let-7miRNA constitutes a central signaling axis in regulating proliferation and neurogenic potential of MGs in adult mammalian retina.

Experimental Procedures

Animals

All procedures involving the use of animals in this study were performed in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines implemented by the Yale University Animal Care and Use Committee. Wild-type mice (strain C57BL/6J), Rosa26-tdTomato reporter mice (strain B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm14(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J) and Lin28aflox/flox; Lin28bflox/flox mice (strain Lin28atm2.1Gqda Lin28btm2.1Gqda/J) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). GSK3βflox/flox mice were kindly provided by Dr. James R Woodgett (McMaster University, Ontario, Canada).

AAV production and intravitreal injection

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) was produced by plasmid co-transfection and iodixanol gradient ultracentrifugation. Purified AAVs were concentrated with Amicon Ultra-15 Filter Units (Millipore, Bedford, MA) to a final titer of 1.0–5.0 X 1013 genome copies/mL. Intravitreal injection was performed using a microsyringe equipped with a 33 gauge needle. The tip of the needle was passed through the sclera, at the equator and next to the dorsal limbus of the eye, into the vitreous cavity. Injection volume was I μl per eye for AAVs or other chemicals including NMDA (Acros Organics, 100 mM) and XAV939 (Sigma, 10 μM).

Retinal cell dissociation and Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)

Retinal dissection was performed in HBSS. Dissected retinas were incubated at 37°C for 20 min in the activated Papain mix composed of 40 μl Papain (Worthington, 500 U/mL), 40 μl Cysteine/EDTA mix (25m M cysteine + 5 mM EDTA, pH 6~7) and 320 μl HBSS/HEPES (normal HBSS + 10 mM HEPES). Cell pellet was collected after centrifugation for 3 min at 3000 rpm, and treated with 10 μl DNase I (Roche, 10 U/ μl) in 400 μl HBSS at room temperature for 3 min with gentle trituration. Dissociated cells were resuspended in an appropriate volume of HBSS for further experiments. To purify tdTomato+ MGs, retinas were isolated from MG-specific reporter mice. After retinal dissociation, cells were washed in DPBS before cell sorting using a BD FACS Aria cell sorter. After cell sorting, both tdTomato+ MGs and non-MGs were subject to RNA isolation and reverse transcription.

Immunohistochemistry and Imaging

Retinas were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at room temperature, and sectioned at the thickness of 20 μm. Sample slides were washed with PBS before incubation with a blocking buffer containing 5% normal donkey serum, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 0.1% NaN3 in PBS for 2 hours at room temperature. Primary antibodies were added for overnight incubation at 4°C. Primary anti bodies used: CyclinD3 (Thermo Scientific), Rhodopsin (Thermo Scientific), NeuN (Millipore), p27kip1 (BD Transduction Laboratories), GS (Millipore), Ki67 (Thermo Scientific), phospho-histone H3 (PH3) (Millipore), HuC/D (Thermo Scientific), Pax6 (BioLegend), and Syntaxin1 (Santa Cruz). Sections were washed with PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 2 hours at room temperature. Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma). Confocal Images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM 510 EXCITER microscope.

RNA isolation, RT-PCR, and Real-Time qPCR

Total RNA was extracted from retinas using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) according to manufacture’s instructions. Reverse transcription (RT) was performed at 42°C for 2 hours in a volume of 20 μl containing 0.5 μg of oligo(dT), 1 X RT buffer, 0.5 mM each deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, and 200 U of Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY). Real-Time quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed in triplicate with SsoFastTM EvaGreen supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) using an iCycler real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The amplification protocol was 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 56°C, and 30 s at 72°C, with a signal detection period of 7 s at 80°C. A melt curve analysis was performed at the end of the reaction to check the reaction specificity. Results were obtained after normalization to the expression level of β-actin. All experiments were performed at least twice to ensure repeatable results.

EdU injection and incorporation assay

EdU solution (1ul) was intravitreally injected into the vitreous chamber at the concentration of 1 mg/ml. Analysis of EdU incorporation was performed using Click-iT EdU Kit (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY). In brief, retinal sections or flatmount preparations were washed in PBS for l0min and then washed twice in PBS containing 3% BSA, followed by permeabilization in PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 for 20 min. EdU detection components were resuspended according to manufacturer’s instructions and applied directly to the samples. The EdU reaction solution contains 215 μl 1X Click-iT reaction buffer, 10 μl CuSO4, 0.6 μl Alexa Fluor azide, and 25 μl 1X Reaction buffer additive. After incubation in the reaction solution for 30min at room temperature, samples were washed with PBS and mounted for detection.

miRNA analysis

Small RNAs were extracted with the mirVanaTM miRNA Isolation Kit and reverse transcribed using TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using specific primers and probes for snoRNA-202, has-let-7a, 7b, and 7f supplied in Taqman MicroRNA Assay Kits (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY). Fold changes were determined using the Δ(ΔCT) method after normalization to mouse snoRNA-202 endogenous controls.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays

HEK293T cells were transfected with the corresponding promoter and expression constructs using PEI (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA). Cells were fixed 48 hours after transfection using 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature. Cross-linking reactions were terminated by adding glycine to a final concentration of 0.125 M. ChIP assays were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX). In brief, cells were resuspended in 6 ml Lysis Buffer. Crude nuclear extract was collected after centrifugation and resuspended in 1.9 ml Lysis Buffer High Salt. After sonication, the supernatant was pre-cleared by protein A/G PLUS-Agrose beads and then incubated with the primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. After incubation with beads for 2 hours at 4 °C, beads we re washed twice with 1 ml Lysis Buffer High Salt and Wash Buffer and resuspended in 400 μl Elution Buffer, followed by incubation overnight at 65 °C for reverse cross-lin king. DNA was isolated using Qiagen Qiaquick PCR purification Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and analyzed by PCR.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical differences between different experimental groups were analyzed by a Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA test using Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. A value of p < 0.05 is considered significant.

Supplementary Material

1
2

Highlights.

  • Retinal injury activates Wnt signaling in MGs

  • Wnt/Lin28/let-7 miRNA signaling regulates MG proliferation

  • Gene transfer of β-catenin or Lin28 stimulates MG proliferation without injury

  • Cell cycle reactivated MGs show neurogenic potential

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. James R Woodgett (McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) for providing GSK3βflox/flox mice. This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01 EY024986, Pew Scholars Program in the Biomedical Sciences, a gift from Dr. Daniel F. Rosberger made through the Foundation for Ophthalmology Research and Education International Inc., and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness to Yale University.

Footnotes

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

B.C. conceived the project. K.Y. and S.Q. performed experiments and analyzed data. L.T., W.D.S., J.G.F., and D.V.S. provided important reagents and discussion. K.Y. and B.C. wrote the paper.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Bernardos RL, Barthel LK, Meyers JR, Raymond PA. Late-stage neuronal progenitors in the retina are radial Muller glia that function as retinal stem cells. J Neurosci. 2007;27:7028–7040. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1624-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bone HK, Damiano T, Bartlett S, Perry A, Letchford J, Ripoll YS, Nelson AS, Welham MJ. Involvement of GSK-3 in regulation of murine embryonic stem cell self-renewal revealed by a series of bisindolylmaleimides. Chem Biol. 2009;16:15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buganim Y, Faddah DA, Cheng AW, Itskovich E, Markoulaki S, Ganz K, Klemm SL, van Oudenaarden A, Jaenisch R. Single-cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase. Cell. 2012;150:1209–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cai WY, Wei TZ, Luo QC, Wu QW, Liu QF, Yang M, Ye GD, Wu JF, Chen YY, Sun GB, et al. The Wnt-beta-catenin pathway represses let-7 microRNA expression through transactivation of Lin28 to augment breast cancer stem cell expansion. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:2877–2889. doi: 10.1242/jcs.123810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cartharius K, Frech K, Grote K, Klocke B, Haltmeier M, Klingenhoff A, Frisch M, Bayerlein M, Werner T. MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:2933–2942. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang TC, Zeitels LR, Hwang HW, Chivukula RR, Wentzel EA, Dews M, Jung J, Gao P, Dang CV, Beer MA, et al. Lin-28B transactivation is necessary for Myc-mediated let-7 repression and proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:3384–3389. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808300106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cimadamore F, Amador-Arjona A, Chen C, Huang CT, Terskikh AV. SOX2-LIN28/let-7 pathway regulates proliferation and neurogenesis in neural precursors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E3017–3026. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220176110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Close JL, Liu J, Gumuscu B, Reh TA. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression regulates proliferation in the postnatal rat retina. Glia. 2006;54:94–104. doi: 10.1002/glia.20361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen P, Frame S. The renaissance of GSK3. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:769–776. doi: 10.1038/35096075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Das AV, Mallya KB, Zhao X, Ahmad F, Bhattacharya S, Thoreson WB, Hegde GV, Ahmad I. Neural stem cell properties of Muller glia in the mammalian retina: regulation by Notch and Wnt signaling. Dev Biol. 2006;299:283–302. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Doble BW, Woodgett JR. GSK-3: tricks of the trade for a multi-tasking kinase. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1175–1186. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dyer MA, Cepko CL. Control of Muller glial cell proliferation and activation following retinal injury. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:873–880. doi: 10.1038/78774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fausett BV, Goldman D. A role for alpha1 tubulin-expressing Muller glia in regeneration of the injured zebrafish retina. J Neurosci. 2006;26:6303–6313. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0332-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Filali M, Cheng N, Abbott D, Leontiev V, Engelhardt JF. Wnt-3A/beta-catenin signaling induces transcription from the LEF-1 promoter. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:33398–33410. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107977200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fimbel SM, Montgomery JE, Burket CT, Hyde DR. Regeneration of inner retinal neurons after intravitreal injection of ouabain in zebrafish. J Neurosci. 2007;27:1712–1724. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5317-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hendzel MJ, Wei Y, Mancini MA, Van Hooser A, Ranalli T, Brinkley BR, Bazett-Jones DP, Allis CD. Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation. Chromosoma. 1997;106:348–360. doi: 10.1007/s004120050256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Heo I, Joo C, Cho J, Ha M, Han J, Kim VN. Lin28 mediates the terminal uridylation of let-7 precursor MicroRNA. Mol Cell. 2008;32:276–284. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hovanes K, Li TW, Munguia JE, Truong T, Milovanovic T, Lawrence Marsh J, Holcombe RF, Waterman ML. Beta-catenin-sensitive isoforms of lymphoid enhancer factor-1 are selectively expressed in colon cancer. Nat Genet. 2001;28:53–57. doi: 10.1038/ng0501-53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hsieh JC, Kodjabachian L, Rebbert ML, Rattner A, Smallwood PM, Samos CH, Nusse R, Dawid IB, Nathans J. A new secreted protein that binds to Wnt proteins and inhibits their activities. Nature. 1999;398:431–436. doi: 10.1038/18899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang SM, Mishina YM, Liu S, Cheung A, Stegmeier F, Michaud GA, Charlat O, Wiellette E, Zhang Y, Wiessner S, et al. Tankyrase inhibition stabilizes axin and antagonizes Wnt signalling. Nature. 2009;461:614–620. doi: 10.1038/nature08356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Iliopoulos D, Hirsch HA, Struhl K. An epigenetic switch involving NF-kappaB, Lin28, Let-7 MicroRNA, and IL6 links inflammation to cell transformation. Cell. 2009;139:693–706. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Karl MO, Hayes S, Nelson BR, Tan K, Buckingham B, Reh TA. Stimulation of neural regeneration in the mouse retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:19508–19513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807453105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim WY, Wang X, Wu Y, Doble BW, Patel S, Woodgett JR, Snider WD. GSK-3 is a master regulator of neural progenitor homeostasis. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:1390–1397. doi: 10.1038/nn.2408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Klimczak RR, Koerber JT, Dalkara D, Flannery JG, Schaffer DV. A novel adeno-associated viral variant for efficient and selective intravitreal transduction of rat Muller cells. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Koerber JT, Klimczak R, Jang JH, Dalkara D, Flannery JG, Schaffer DV. Molecular evolution of adeno-associated virus for enhanced glial gene delivery. Mol Ther. 2009;17:2088–2095. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuzmanovic M, Dudley VJ, Sarthy VP. GFAP promoter drives Muller cell-specific expression in transgenic mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3606–3613. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lie DC, Colamarino SA, Song HJ, Desire L, Mira H, Consiglio A, Lein ES, Jessberger S, Lansford H, Dearie AR, et al. Wnt signalling regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Nature. 2005;437:1370–1375. doi: 10.1038/nature04108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu B, Hunter DJ, Rooker S, Chan A, Paulus YM, Leucht P, Nusse Y, Nomoto H, Helms JA. Wnt signaling promotes Muller cell proliferation and survival after injury. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:444–453. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Loffler K, Schafer P, Volkner M, Holdt T, Karl MO. Age-dependent Muller glia neurogenic competence in the mouse retina. Glia. 2015;63:1809–1824. doi: 10.1002/glia.22846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Logan CY, Nusse R. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:781–810. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.113126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, Oh SW, Zariwala HA, Gu H, Ng LL, Palmiter RD, Hawrylycz MJ, Jones AR, et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:133–140. doi: 10.1038/nn.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Moss EG, Tang L. Conservation of the heterochronic regulator Lin-28, its developmental expression and microRNA complementary sites. Dev Biol. 2003;258:432–442. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00126-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Newman MA, Thomson JM, Hammond SM. Lin-28 interaction with the Let-7 precursor loop mediates regulated microRNA processing. RNA. 2008;14:1539–1549. doi: 10.1261/rna.1155108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ooto S, Akagi T, Kageyama R, Akita J, Mandai M, Honda Y, Takahashi M. Potential for neural regeneration after neurotoxic injury in the adult mammalian retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:13654–13659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402129101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Osakada F, Ooto S, Akagi T, Mandai M, Akaike A, Takahashi M. Wnt signaling promotes regeneration in the retina of adult mammals. J Neurosci. 2007;27:4210–4219. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4193-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Qin Z, Barthel LK, Raymond PA. Genetic evidence for shared mechanisms of epimorphic regeneration in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:9310–9315. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811186106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ramachandran R, Fausett BV, Goldman D. Ascl1a regulates Muller glia dedifferentiation and retinal regeneration through a Lin-28-dependent, let-7 microRNA signalling pathway. Nat Cell Biol. 2010a;12:1101–1107. doi: 10.1038/ncb2115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ramachandran R, Reifler A, Parent JM, Goldman D. Conditional gene expression and lineage tracing of tuba1a expressing cells during zebrafish development and retina regeneration. J Comp Neurol. 2010b;518:4196–4212. doi: 10.1002/cne.22448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ramachandran R, Zhao XF, Goldman D. Ascl1a/Dkk/beta-catenin signaling pathway is necessary and glycogen synthase kinase-3beta inhibition is sufficient for zebrafish retina regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:15858–15863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107220108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Resnitzky D, Gossen M, Bujard H, Reed SI. Acceleration of the G1/S phase transition by expression of cyclins D1 and E with an inducible system. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:1669–1679. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.3.1669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rybak A, Fuchs H, Smirnova L, Brandt C, Pohl EE, Nitsch R, Wulczyn FG. A feedback loop comprising lin-28 and let-7 controls pre-let-7 maturation during neural stem-cell commitment. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:987–993. doi: 10.1038/ncb1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sahel JA, Albert DM, Lessell S, Adler H, McGee TL, Konrad-Rastegar J. Mitogenic effects of excitatory amino acids in the adult rat retina. Exp Eye Res. 1991;53:657–664. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(91)90226-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sato N, Meijer L, Skaltsounis L, Greengard P, Brivanlou AH. Maintenance of pluripotency in human and mouse embryonic stem cells through activation of Wnt signaling by a pharmacological GSK-3-specific inhibitor. Nat Med. 2004;10:55–63. doi: 10.1038/nm979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Scholzen T, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol. 2000;182:311–322. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200003)182:3<311::AID-JCP1>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Shtutman M, Zhurinsky J, Simcha I, Albanese C, D'Amico M, Pestell R, Ben-Ze'ev A. The cyclin D1 gene is a target of the beta-catenin/LEF-1 pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:5522–5527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Shyh-Chang N, Daley GQ. Lin28: primal regulator of growth and metabolism in stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:395–406. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Suga A, Sadamoto K, Fujii M, Mandai M, Takahashi M. Proliferation potential of Muller glia after retinal damage varies between mouse strains. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Takeda M, Takamiya A, Jiao JW, Cho KS, Trevino SG, Matsuda T, Chen DF. alpha-Aminoadipate induces progenitor cell properties of Muller glia in adult mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1142–1150. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tetsu O, McCormick F. Beta-catenin regulates expression of cyclin D1 in colon carcinoma cells. Nature. 1999;398:422–426. doi: 10.1038/18884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Thummel R, Kassen SC, Montgomery JE, Enright JM, Hyde DR. Inhibition of Muller glial cell division blocks regeneration of the light-damaged zebrafish retina. Dev Neurobiol. 2008;68:392–408. doi: 10.1002/dneu.20596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ueki Y, Wilken MS, Cox KE, Chipman L, Jorstad N, Sternhagen K, Simic M, Ullom K, Nakafuku M, Reh TA. Transgenic expression of the proneural transcription factor Ascl1 in Muller glia stimulates retinal regeneration in young mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:13717–13722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510595112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Vecino E, Rodriguez FD, Ruzafa N, Pereiro X, Sharma SC. Glia-neuron interactions in the mammalian retina. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Viswanathan SR, Daley GQ, Gregory RI. Selective blockade of microRNA processing by Lin28. Science. 2008;320:97–100. doi: 10.1126/science.1154040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Viswanathan SR, Powers JT, Einhorn W, Hoshida Y, Ng TL, Toffanin S, O'Sullivan M, Lu J, Phillips LA, Lockhart VL, et al. Lin28 promotes transformation and is associated with advanced human malignancies. Nat Genet. 2009;41:843–848. doi: 10.1038/ng.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wan J, Zhao XF, Vojtek A, Goldman D. Retinal injury, growth factors, and cytokines converge on beta-catenin and pStat3 signaling to stimulate retina regeneration. Cell Rep. 2014;9:285–297. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wan J, Zheng H, Chen ZL, Xiao HL, Shen ZJ, Zhou GM. Preferential regeneration of photoreceptor from Muller glia after retinal degeneration in adult rat. Vision Res. 2008;48:223–234. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wan J, Zheng H, Xiao HL, She ZJ, Zhou GM. Sonic hedgehog promotes stem-cell potential of Muller glia in the mammalian retina. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;363:347–354. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.08.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ying QL, Wray J, Nichols J, Batlle-Morera L, Doble B, Woodgett J, Cohen P, Smith A. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature. 2008;453:519–523. doi: 10.1038/nature06968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007;318:1917–1920. doi: 10.1126/science.1151526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2

RESOURCES