Skip to main content
Applications in Plant Sciences logoLink to Applications in Plant Sciences
. 2016 Oct 14;4(10):apps.1600064. doi: 10.3732/apps.1600064

Isolation and identification of EST-SSR markers in Chunia bucklandioides (Hamamelidaceae)1

Kaikai Meng 2, Mingwan Li 2, Qiang Fan 2, Weizheng Tan 2, Jian Sun 2, Wenbo Liao 2, Sufang Chen 2,3
PMCID: PMC5077281  PMID: 27785382

Abstract

Premise of the study:

Chunia bucklandioides (Hamamelidaceae), endemic to Hainan, China, is listed as threatened in the IUCN Red List and is now only found on Mt. Diaoluo and Mt. Jianfeng. Thus, microsatellite markers were developed for future conservation genetic studies of this species.

Methods and Results:

A total of 115 primers were designed on the basis of the transcriptome data of C. bucklandioides. Of them, 59 successfully amplified in C. bucklandioides and polymorphisms were detected in 11; the number of alleles per locus varied from two to five, the observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.000 to 0.941, and the expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.000 to 0.699. A total of 13 primers amplified in Mytilaria laosensis, and five primers amplified in Exbucklandia tonkinensis and E. populnea.

Conclusions:

The markers screened here provide a basis to assess genetic structure and further establish conservation strategies for C. bucklandioides.

Keywords: Chunia bucklandioides, Hamamelidaceae, microsatellite markers, transcriptome


Hamamelidaceae, a family of woody plants ranging from tall trees to small shrubs, is an ancient family of approximately 26 genera and 100 species (Endress, 1993). The genera in this family are small: 14 are monotypic, six contain only two to three species, and others are composed of five to 14 species. Furthermore, most species in this family are narrow endemics or are very restricted in their distribution mostly due to past climatic changes (Endress, 1993). Fourteen species of Hamamelidaceae are currently listed as threatened in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN, 2015). To date, only sporadic studies have emphasized the genetic study and conservation of these species (Yu et al., 2014; Hatmaker et al., 2015).

Chunia bucklandioides H. T. Chang (Hamamelidaceae), the only species in Chunia H. T. Chang, was listed as threatened in the IUCN Red List in 1997. It is a tall tree endemic to Hainan, China, and the wood can be applied in agricultural implements, furniture, and construction. However, it is now found only on Mt. Diaoluo and Mt. Jianfeng (IUCN, 2015). Here, we developed and characterized 11 polymorphic expressed sequence tag–simple sequence repeat (EST-SSR) markers and tested their cross-transferability in three related species—Mytilaria laosensis Lecomte, Exbucklandia tonkinensis (Lecomte) H. T. Chang, and E. populnea (R. Br. ex Griff.) R. W. Brown—on the basis of the phylogenetic tree of Hamamelidaceae (Shi et al., 1999). We expect that these markers will be useful for future conservation genetic studies of the species.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The total RNAs were extracted from the fresh leaves of one individual of C. bucklandioides (Mt. Diaoluo; Appendix 1) using the optimized cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Gambino et al., 2008). A normalized cDNA library was constructed and sequenced using the HiSeq 2000 system (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA). A total of 55.34 million 100-bp paired-end reads were produced and de novo assembled into 88,011 contigs (N50: 1056 bp) using Trinity (Grabherr et al., 2011). With the MISA tool (Thiel et al., 2003; http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa), 11,100 SSRs were detected in 9456 contigs. Of them, dinucleotide repeat motifs (72.73%) were the most common, followed by tri- (24.69%), tetra- (2.23%), penta- (0.19%), and hexanucleotide (0.16%) repeats. Using Primer3 (Rozen and Skaletsky, 1999), 115 paired primers were designed on the basis of randomly selected contigs containing SSR loci, which were deposited in GenBank (Appendix S1).

A total of 48 individuals of C. bucklandioides representing two populations were used to evaluate the polymorphisms of the target SSR loci, and 28 individuals of M. laosensis, E. tonkinensis, and E. populnea were used to test their transferability (Appendix 1). Total genomic DNA was extracted from silica-dried leaves of these individuals using the modified CTAB method (Doyle, 1987). Voucher specimens of these species were deposited at the Herbarium of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

The PCR amplification trials were performed on two individuals from each of the two C. bucklandioides populations according to Fan et al. (2013), with appropriate annealing temperature (52–55°C; Table 1). For the 59 primer pairs that showed clear peaks with expected allele size, six individuals from each population were selected to tentatively assess their size polymorphism. The products were inspected with the Fragment Analyzer Automated CE System (Advanced Analytical Technologies [AATI], Ames, Iowa, USA) using the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Reagent Kit (35–500 bp; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). The raw data were further processed to obtain allele size and number using PROSize version 2.0 software (AATI). The results showed that 11 loci were polymorphic in C. bucklandioides, and 48 loci were monomorphic. Further PCR amplification was performed on 48 individuals of C. bucklandioides with these 11 polymorphic primer pairs. The statistical parameters, including the number of alleles per locus (A), observed heterozygosity (Ho), and expected heterozygosity (He), were calculated with GenAlEx version 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012). GENEPOP 4.3 was used to measure the departure from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (Rousset, 2008). The results showed that A varied from two to five, and Ho and He ranged from 0.000 to 0.941 and from 0.000 to 0.699, respectively. Four and six loci showed significant deviation from HWE in the Mt. Diaoluo and Mt. Jianfeng populations, respectively (see Table 2).

Table 1.

Characteristics of 19 microsatellite loci isolated from Chunia bucklandioides that showed polymorphism in C. bucklandioides or that could be amplified in closely related taxa.

Locus Primer sequences (5′–3′) Repeat motif Expected allele size (bp) Ta (°C) GenBank accession no. Putative function [organism]a
N31 F: ATTAGTCCATAACGGCTAGT (CTA)5 161 52 KX254740
R: CCAAGAGAAGACAATGAACC
N34 F: GCTTCCTCGTCCTTCTCT (GAC)6 311 52 KX254743 PREDICTED: RING-H2 finger protein ATL67-like [Nelumbo nucifera]
R: CGGCATCATTCTAATCATCTC
N50 F: TGAGCATCTGATTACGAAGA (TTGT)6 204 52 KX254759 Conserved hypothetical protein [Ricinus communis]
R: CCAATCTCCGATACGACTT
N54 F: CGGGAGATGATAAAGGATACA (AT)8 237 52 KX254763 Hypothetical protein ZeamMp042 [Zea mays subsp. mays]
R: GGATCGGAGAAGCATTCG
N91 F: GCTACCTGACCTCTTCTTC (CT)6 361 55 KX254800 Uncharacterized protein LOC100854009 [Vitis vinifera]
R: GATTACTCGGACGGTGAC
N1 F: ATCGCCATTCTTGCTCTC (AG)6 300 52 KX254710
R: GCTCCAATACACGCCATA
N6 F: GCCTCCGTTAATTGTGTAC (AT)6 317 52 KX254715 Hypothetical protein, partial (mitochondrion) [Nicotiana tabacum]
R: AGCCTTCGATGTAGTGATG
N49 F: GGAACAACCACGAAGAAGA (AAG)7 219 52 KX254758 PREDICTED: nucleolar protein 56-like [Vitis vinifera]
R: GTCTACTCTGCCACAACTATA
N65 F: TCACTTCTACCTCGCAATG (CTT)5 187 52 KX254774 Uncharacterized protein LOC100262883 [Vitis vinifera]
R: ACAGTCTTCTCTTCAATGGA
N89 F: CCGCAACAATATCGTCATT (TCA)5 257 52 KX254798 Uncharacterized protein LOC100262883 [Vitis vinifera]
R: GGAAGAAGGTGGAGAACAT
N90 F: ATAGATAGACACTGGTGGATAG (GGT)5 163 52 KX254799
R: AACAGGCTCACATTACATCA
N97 F: CGTAAGGTGTGCGATTCT (AAC)5 305 52 KX254806 Uncharacterized protein LOC105794361 [Gossypium raimondii]
R: AGAGTTGCCAACAGAGATG
N98 F: GCAGCAGTGAGTCAAGTG (GAG)5 242 52 KX254807 Uncharacterized protein LOC105111436 [Populus euphratica]
R: CCTATCCTCCATCTCATCCA
N23 F: TTGGAGTGATGGTTGAGG (AC)6 194 55 KX254732
R: GTTCGGAGAAGAGGAAAGTA
N43 F: ATTCAACGGAGTTAGGACAT (TA)7 147 52 KX254752
R: GATTGACGAGAACACATCAT
N45 F: CCTGATTACAATGAAGTCTTGG (GA)7 189 52 KX254754 Tau class glutathione transferase GSTU43 [Theobroma cacao]
R: AGTAGTTCTGCCTTGAAGTT
N64 F: TGACGGTGGTAAGAAGGTA (AT)9 199 52 KX254773
R: GAACGCAACAGGCATCTA
N84 F: CCTTGTCTCCTCATTGTCTT (AT)7 270 52 KX254793 PREDICTED: serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 1 [Gossypium raimondii]
R: GCTCTGCTGTTGCTTACT
N114 F: ACCAGACGACCACTACAG (AGATG)5 149 52 KX254823
R: CGAAGCATAAGGAGATTGGA

Note: Ta = annealing temperature.

a

E-value < 10−6.

Table 2.

Amplification and polymorphism of 19 microsatellite loci in populations of the four species.a

Chunia bucklandioides
Mt. Diaoluo (N = 24) Jianfengling (N = 24) Mytilaria laosensis (N = 16) Exbucklandia tonkinensis (N = 9) and E. populnea (N = 3)
Locus A Ho Heb A Ho Heb Allele size (bp) A Ho Heb Allele size (bp) Allele size (bp)
N31 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 161 1 0.000 0.000 161 161
N34 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 309 1 0.000 0.000 315 315
N50 2 0.435 0.340 3 0.000 0.169*** 187–204 1 0.000 0.000 195 195
N54 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 234 1 0.000 0.000 238 218
N91 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 359 1 0.000 0.000 364 364
N1 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 300 1 0.000 0.000 296
N6 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 317 1 0.000 0.000 317
N49 1 0.000 0.000 2 0.083 0.080 211–226 3 0.200 0.380* 284–311
N65 1 0.000 0.000 5 0.091 0.504*** 167–187 3 0.375 0.537 155–173
N89 2 0.773 0.474 2 0.941 0.524 257–266 1 0.000 0.000 257
N90 2 0.217 0.258** 2 0.174 0.159 145–164 2 0.125 0.375* 161–164
N97 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 305 1 0.000 0.000 308
N98 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 242 1 0.000 0.000 203
N23 4 0.565 0.699 4 0.304 0.521* 187–199
N43 2 0.500 0.486** 2 0.200 0.420 133–147
N45 2 0.000 0.423*** 2 0.217 0.496** 181–189
N64 2 0.130 0.122 3 0.095 0.459*** 184–199
N84 2 0.227 0.416** 2 0.059 0.327*** 266–272
N114 2 0.087 0.083 1 0.000 0.000 140–150

Note: — = no amplification; A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; N = sampled individuals from each population.

a

Population and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.

b

Significant deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium after sequential Bonferroni corrections: *** represents significance at the 0.1% nominal level; ** represents significance at the 1% nominal level; * represents significance at the 5% nominal level.

Finally, the cross-amplification of the 59 primers that successfully amplified in C. bucklandioides was also tested in M. laosensis, E. tonkinensis, and E. populnea. Of them, 13 amplified in M. laosensis, and five amplified in E. tonkinensis and E. populnea (Table 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we isolated and characterized a set of 11 polymorphic EST-SSR markers, which may be useful for future conservation genetic studies of C. bucklandioides. The cross-genus amplification and polymorphism were also tested in three related species.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material 1

Appendix 1.

Voucher specimen information for populations used in this study. Specimens are deposited at the Herbarium of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

Species Voucher no. Collection localitya Geographic coordinates N
Chunia bucklandioides H. T. Chang Fan and Li 13194 Jianfengling, Hainan 18°44′58.90″N, 108°55′07.20″E 24
Fan and Li 13040 Mt. Diaoluo, Hainan 18°41′40.22″N, 109°50′39.28″E 24
Mytilaria laosensis Lecomte Fan, Li and Liu 13481 Heishiding, Guangdong 23°27′13.81″N, 111°52′19.63″E 4
Fan, Li and Liu 13497 Tongledashan, Guangxi 23°12′28.00″N, 111°24′13.00″E 4
Fan, Li and Liu 13502 Xinyi, Guangdong 22°24′12.62″N, 111°30′38.26″E 4
Fan, Li and Liu 13528 Yangchun, Guangdong 21°54′23.95″N, 111°30′32.71″E 4
Exbucklandia tonkinensis (Lecomte) H. T. Chang Liu Lxp-09-6584 Taoyuandong, Hunan 26°34′06.32″N, 114°04′46.71″E 3
Fan, Li and Liu 13484 Heishiding, Guangdong 23°25′52.00″N, 111°52′43.89″E 3
Fan, Li and Liu 13540 Yangchun, Guangdong 21°51′31.73″N, 111°25′18.75″E 3
Exbucklandia populnea (R. Br. ex Griff.) R. W. Brown Fan 13585 Malipo, Yunnan 23°11′20.52″N, 104°49′17.23″E 3

Note: N = number of individuals sampled.

a

City and province in China.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Doyle J. J. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissues. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  2. Endress P. K. 1993. Hamamelidaceae. In K. Kubitzki [ed.], The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. 2, 322–331. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fan Q., Chen S. F., Li M. L., He S. Y., Zhou R. C., Liao W. B. 2013. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers from the transcriptome of Firmiana danxiaensis (Malvaceae s.l.). Applications in Plant Sciences 1: 1300047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gambino G., Perrone I., Gribaudo I. 2008. A rapid and effective method for RNA extraction from different tissues of grapevine and other woody plants. Phytochemical Analysis 19: 520–525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grabherr M. G., Haas B. J., Yassour M., Levin J. Z., Thompson D. A., Amit I., Adiconis X., et al. 2011. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnology 29: 644–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hatmaker E. A., Wadl P. A., Mantooth K., Scheffler B. E., Ownley B. H., Trigiano R. N. 2015. Development of microsatellites from Fothergilla ×intermedia (Hamamelidaceae) and cross transfer to four other genera within Hamamelidaceae. Applications in Plant Sciences 3: 1400123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). 2015. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Website http://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 12 September 2016].
  8. Peakall R., Smouse P. E. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 28: 2537–2539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rousset F. 2008. GENEPOP’007: A complete reimplementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 103–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rozen S., Skaletsky H. 1999. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Misener and S. A. Krawetz [eds.], Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132: Bioinformatics methods and protocols, 365–386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shi S. H., Huang Y. L., Zhang Q., Qu L. H., Zhang H. D. 1999. The phylogenetic relationships between Mytilarioideae and the other subfamilies of Hamamelidaceae inferred from the ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni 38: 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  12. Thiel T., Michalek W., Varshney R. K., Graner A. 2003. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 10: 411–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yu Y., Fan Q., Shen R. J., Guo W., Jian J. H., Cui D. F., Liao W. B. 2014. Genetic variability and population structure of Disanthus cercidifolius subsp. longipes (Hamamelidaceae) based on AFLP analysis. PLoS ONE 9: e107769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1

Articles from Applications in Plant Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES