ABSTRACT
Bone remodeling is a continuous physiological process that requires constant generation of new osteoblasts from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Differentiation of MSCs to osteoblast requires a metabolic switch from glycolysis to increased mitochondrial respiration to ensure the sufficient energy supply to complete this process. As a consequence of this increased mitochondrial metabolism, the levels of endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS) rise. In the current study we analyzed the role of forkhead box O3 (FOXO3) in the control of ROS levels in human MSCs (hMSCs) during osteogenic differentiation. Treatment of hMSCs with H2O2 induced FOXO3 phosphorylation at Ser294 and nuclear translocation. This ROS-mediated activation of FOXO3 was dependent on mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 (MAPK8/JNK) activity. Upon FOXO3 downregulation, osteoblastic differentiation was impaired and hMSCs lost their ability to control elevated ROS levels. Our results also demonstrate that in response to elevated ROS levels, FOXO3 induces autophagy in hMSCs. In line with this, impairment of autophagy by autophagy-related 7 (ATG7) knockdown resulted in a reduced capacity of hMSCs to regulate elevated ROS levels, together with a reduced osteoblast differentiation. Taken together our findings are consistent with a model where in hMSCs, FOXO3 is required to induce autophagy and thereby reduce elevated ROS levels resulting from the increased mitochondrial respiration during osteoblast differentiation. These new molecular insights provide an important contribution to our better understanding of bone physiology.
KEYWORDS: autophagy, FOXO3, human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs), mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 (MAPK8/JNK), osteoblasts, reactive oxygen species (ROS)
Introduction
Adult bones undergo a continuous remodeling that starts with the resorption of mineralized bone matrix by osteoclasts followed by de novo bone formation by osteoblasts. Osteoblasts are terminally differentiated and short lived cells (approximately 3 mo), therefore bone growth and maintenance requires their constant replacement with new osteoblasts originating from pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).1,2 Commitment and differentiation of MSCs toward osteoblast starts with osteoprogenitor cells that generate pre-osteoblasts, which subsequently develop into mature osteoblasts.3 To ensure a sufficient energy supply necessary for differentiation, MSCs undergo a metabolic switch which involves lowering glycolysis and increasing mitochondrial respiration.4 The increased mitochondrial metabolism is usually accompanied by increase in the endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS), a potentially deleterious by-product of mitochondrial respiration.5,6 To prevent accumulation of ROS the differentiating MSCs activate a very efficient antioxidant defense system, which is at least partially based on upregulation of antioxidant enzymes such as manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase (SOD2/MnSOD) and catalase.4 However, mechanistic details of this antioxidant control in MSCs are poorly understood.
Forkhead box O (FOXO) transcription factors play an important role in the cellular defense against oxidative stress. The FOXO family comprises 4 members: FOXO1, FOXO3, FOXO4 and FOXO6. They can modulate the antioxidant responses through the transcriptional activation of SOD2,7 catalase8 and glutathione peroxidase, and by regulation of cell cycle, DNA repair and lifespan.9,10 In response to oxidative stress FOXOs are phosphorylated by MAPK8, mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 (MAPK14/p38 α) and serine/threonine-protein kinase 4 (STK4/MST1), which results in translocation to the nucleus and transcriptional activation of target genes. ROS-activated MAPK8 phosphorylates FOXO4 on threonine 447/threonine 451 and on threonine 223/serine 226,11,12 while MAPK14 activated by doxorubicin-induced ROS phosphorylates FOXO3 on Ser7.13 On the other hand, activation of STK4 by increased levels of ROS results in phosphorylation of FOXO1 and FOXO3 at serine 112 and serine 207 respectively, disrupting their binding to 14-3-3 protein β/α (YWHAB/14-3-3), a conserved regulatory protein, and promoting FOXO translocation to the nucleus.14
FOXOs have also been implicated in the regulation of osteoblasts differentiation and the maintenance of skeletal homeostasis.15 Conditional deletion of Foxo1, Foxo3 and Foxo4 in mice resulted in increased oxidative stress in bone, osteoblast apoptosis and a decrease in the number of osteoblasts. Conversely, overexpression of a Foxo3 transgene in mature osteoblasts decreased oxidative stress and osteoblast apoptosis and increased the rate of bone formation.16 Thus, FOXOs appear to play an important role in bone biology by modulating the oxidative defense of mature osteoblasts. However, the role of FOXOs antioxidant properties in generation of new osteoblasts remains unclear. In this study we investigated how FOXO3 maintains redox homeostasis in human MSCs during their differentiation to osteoblasts. Our data demonstrate that in hMSCs ROS induces phosphorylation of FOXO3 and its translocation to the nucleus. This novel ROS-dependent phosphorylation of FOXO3 at serine 294 is mediated by MAPK8 kinase. We also show that upon H2O2 treatment, activation of FOXO3 in hMSCs results in downregulation of ROS through the activation of autophagy. Finally, our results demonstrate the important role of autophagy in the control of oxidative stress during the osteoblastic differentiation of hMSCs.
Results
FOXO3 regulates ROS levels in hMSCs during osteoblast differentiation
To investigate the role of FOXO3 in the regulation of ROS during osteoblast differentiation of hMSCs, the expression of FOXO3 was first analyzed. FOXO3 was upregulated on both the mRNA and protein level reaching maximum expression at d 7, with a decline at d 14 of differentiation (Fig. 1A). Importantly, FOXO3 knockdown resulted in the inhibition of osteoblastic differentiation of hMSCs, as measured by levels and activity of alkaline phosphatase (ALPL), an early marker of osteoblastic activity (Fig. 1B and Fig. S1A, B, C).17 To assess the effects of FOXO3 knockdown on matrix mineralization during osteoblastic differentiation, calcium deposition was measured using Alizarin Red S staining (Fig. 1C). The amount of calcium present in the cultures at d 10 and 14 of osteogenic differentiation was strongly reduced upon FOXO3 knockdown confirming the important role of FOXO3 in this process.
To explore whether FOXO3 knockdown-mediated inhibition of osteoblast differentiation was a result of the reduced ability of MSCs to manage increased oxidative stress, hMSCs were treated with H2O2 at d 0 and 7 of differentiation, and levels of ROS were measured. In line with an increase of FOXO3 expression at d 7 (Fig. 1A), hMSCs transfected with control siRNA showed a reduction in ROS levels at this time point (Fig. 1D). In contrast, FOXO3 knockdown resulted in elevated ROS levels at d 0 and d 7 of hMSCs differentiation to osteoblasts, indicating that FOXO3 is important for the regulation of ROS in these cells (Fig. 1D). To further corroborate these results, an immortalized hMSCs cell line (hMSCs-TERT) carrying doxycycline (DOX) inducible, constitutively active FOXO3 (further referred to as hMSCs-FOXO3-(A3)) was generated. The morphology and CD marker profile of these hMSCs is highly comparable to nontransduced bone marrow derived hMSCs (Fig. S2A and B). Furthermore, hMSCs-TERT have the ability to differentiate toward osteoblasts (Fig. S2C, E-G) and adipocytes (Fig. S2H), which confirms their hMSCs identity. Likewise, hMSCs-FOXO3-(A3) are also capable of osteogenic differentiation (Fig. S2D). Importantly, induction of FOXO3-(A3) expression by doxycycline treatment in hMSCs-FOXO3-(A3) resulted in increased levels of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (CDKN1B/p27KIP1), a FOXO-transcriptional target, indicating the activation of FOXO3-mediated transcription (Fig. 1E right panel; Fig. S1D). To establish whether FOXO3 can regulate ROS levels in hMSCs, hMSCs-FOXO3-(A3) were treated with H2O2 or with H2O2 preceded by pretreatment with DOX, and ROS levels were measured. As a control, hMSCs- FOXO3-(A3) were also treated with H2O2 combined with pretreatment with the ROS scavenger N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a synthetic precursor of intracellular cysteine and glutathione.18,19 Both the induction of FOXO3-(A3) signaling and treatment with NAC resulted in significant reduction of ROS levels in hMSCs (Fig. 1E, left panel). Taken together, these data indicate that FOXO3 is important in the regulation of augmented levels of ROS during hMSCs differentiation to osteoblasts.
Activation of FOXO3 by oxidative stress is dependent on MAPK8 and MAPK11/12/14 MAP kinases
FOXO3 protein and mRNA expression is induced most prominently at d 7 and 10 of osteogenic differentiation when the highest ROS induction occurs.20 To determine whether ROS have a role in the regulation of FOXO3 activity in hMSCs, induction of high ROS levels during osteogenic differentiation was mimicked by exposing hMSCs to H2O2 for a short period of time. First, we examined the subcellular localization of FOXO3 by confocal microscopy after hMSCs were treated with H2O2 or hydroxyacid oxidase 1 (HAO1/GOX), an oxido-reductase that catalyzes the oxidation of glucose to hydrogen peroxide.21,22 Both H2O2 and HAO1 induced FOXO3 translocation to the nucleus, which could be abrogated by the pre-treatment of cells with NAC (Fig. 2A).
Phosphorylation of FOXO3 on Ser7 by the MAPK14 MAP kinase has been shown to promote its nuclear localization in response to doxorubicin,13 an anti-cancer drug that induces cytotoxicity by stimulating the production of intracellular free radicals. We therefore evaluated whether ROS-mediated nuclear translocation of FOXO3 is regulated by a similar MAP kinase-dependent mechanism in hMSCs. However, treatment of hMSCs with H2O2 or doxorubicin did not trigger FOXO3 Ser7 phosphorylation (Fig. 2B). In contrast, hMSCs doxorubicin and H2O2 induced the phosphorylation of FOXO3 at serine 294, previously identified as a target of MAPK11/12/14, MAPK8 and mitogen-activated protein kinase 1/3 (MAPK1/3, ERK1/2) MAP kinases.13 This novel ROS-dependent phosphorylation was decreased when cells were treated with NAC (Fig. 2B and Fig. S3A). To assess whether exposure to ROS has also an effect on other FOXO family members, hMSCs were treated with increasing doses of H2O2 and the phosphorylation of FOXO4 at threonine 223/serine 226, previously demonstrated to be a target of ROS-activated MAPK8 kinase,12 was evaluated. No changes in phosphorylation status of FOXO4 at this residue could be detected. Together our data show, that ROS promotes phosphorylation of FOXO3 at Ser294 and induces its translocation to the nucleus.
To identify the specific MAP kinase regulating FOXO3 Ser294 phosphorylation we analyzed the phosphorylation status of MAPK11/12/14, MAPK8 and MAPK1/3 MAP kinases after exposure of hMSCs to H2O2. H2O2 treatment induced phosphorylation of MAPK11/12/14 and MAPK8, but not MAPK1/3 (Fig. 2C; Fig. S3C), suggesting that increased ROS levels is sufficient to activate these 2 kinases in hMSCs. Next, the effect of MAPK11/12/14 or MAPK8 inhibition on ROS-mediated phosphorylation of FOXO3 on Ser294 was investigated. Phosphorylation of FOXO3 Ser294 was significantly decreased after treatment with MAPK8 kinase inhibitor (SP600125) and only moderately reduced by MAPK11/12/14 inhibition (SB203580) (Fig. 2D; Fig. S3D). In line with this, ROS-mediated translocation of FOXO3 to the nucleus was completely abrogated by treatment with MAPK8 kinase inhibitor and only partially inhibited by MAPK11/12/14 inhibitor treatment (Fig. 2E). Our results demonstrate that H2O2 can activate FOXO3 predominantly through MAPK8-induced Ser294 phosphorylation.
To determine whether inhibition of MAPK8 activity during osteoblastic differentiation affects the ability of hMSCs to control the ROS levels, hMSCs were treated with H2O2 and/or with SP600125 at d 7 of differentiation and ROS were measured. Despite the upregulated expression of FOXO3 at this time point of hMSCs differentiation (Fig 1A), MAPK8 inhibition resulted in increased ROS levels, suggesting that FOXO3 activity was compromised (Fig. 2F). Moreover, in the presence of SP600125 osteoblast differentiation was significantly less efficient (Fig. 2G; Fig. S3E-F), supporting a role for MAPK8 in this process.
H2O2 treatment induces autophagy during hMSCs differentiation to osteoblasts
Autophagy can play an antioxidant role by eliminating sources of excess ROS, which include damaged mitochondria and toxic aggregates.23 Importantly, we and others have previously demonstrated that FOXO transcription factors regulate this process.24-26 To establish whether autophagy may play a role in controlling ROS levels during osteogenic differentiation, the expression of components of the autophagy machinery known to be regulated by FOXO3 was determined.24-26 mRNA levels of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 β (MAP1LC3B/LC3B), GABA type A receptor associated protein like 1 (GABARAPL1), BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19kDa interacting protein 3 (BNIP3) and parkin RBR E3 ubiquitin protein ligase (PARK2) were all significantly upregulated in hMSCs undergoing osteogenic differentiation (Fig. 3A). However, increased expression of the autophagy machinery does not necessarily indicate an increase in autophagic flux. Therefore, autophagic turnover during osteogenic differentiation was studied by analyzing the levels of MAP1LC3B-II, a lipidated form of MAP1LC3B-I ubiquitin-like protein, which associates with autophagosomal membranes.27 An increase in MAP1LC3B-II is not a measure of autophagic flux on its own, since it can also indicate an inhibition of autophagosome clearance.28 Thus, to prevent lysosomal degradation and to block the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes, hMSCs were also treated with bafilomycin A1 (BafA1). MAP1LC3B-II was significantly upregulated during osteoblast differentiation, reaching the highest levels at d 7 and 10, which corresponds with the upregulation of FOXO3 during this process (Fig. 3B). Importantly, blocking autophagy by ATG7 knockdown, a critical component regulating the elongation and closure of the autophagosomal membrane,28,29 resulted in inhibition of osteoblast differentiation of hMSCs (Fig. 3C-D).
To investigate whether autophagy is triggered by elevated ROS levels in hMSCs, cells were treated with H2O2 for 24 h and the expression of genes critical for mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy) and autophagic flux was determined. The expression of MAP1LC3B, GABARAPL1, PARK2, BNIP3 and autophagy-related 14 (ATG14) were all significantly upregulated after exposure of hMSCs to H2O2 (Fig. 3E). Likewise, H2O2 induced accumulation of MAP1LC3B-II in the presence of BafA1 in hMSCs (Fig. 3F), indicating a ROS-dependent increase in autophagy flux. To further validate these findings, the autophagic flux of hMSCs was measured by flow cytometry (FACS) using Cyto-ID, a dye selectively labeling autophagic vacuoles.30,31 As expected, treatment of hMSCs with H2O2 increased the amount of autophagic vacuoles (Fig. 3G). Similarly, exposure to ROS combined with treatment with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), an inhibitor of lysosomal function acting in a comparable way to BafA1 (Fig. S4)27,32-35 induced a higher autophagic flux in hMSCs (Fig. 3G). To demonstrate that autophagy is indeed necessary to downregulate ROS in hMSCs, cells were treated with BafA1 in combination with H2O2 and ROS levels were then determined. hMSCs treated with Baf1A and H2O2 showed a significant increase in ROS when compared to cells exposed to H2O2 alone (Fig. 3H). Likewise, blocking autophagy by ATG7 knockdown during osteoblast differentiation resulted in increased ROS levels at d 7 of differentiation in hMSCs exposed to H2O2 (Fig. 3I). Taken together, autophagy is an important anti-oxidant mechanism utilized by hMSCs to reduce ROS levels during osteogenic differentiation.
FOXO3 reduces ROS levels by activation of autophagy in hMSCs
To investigate whether ROS-induced autophagy is FOXO-dependent, the expression of genes regulating autophagy in hMSCs was evaluated upon conditional expression of constitutively active FOXO3. FOXO target genes including MAP1LC3B, GABARAPL1 were significantly upregulated (Fig. 4A). mRNA levels of PARK2 36-38 a ubiquitin ligase indispensable for induction of mitophagy, the process important for clearance of ROS, were also significantly increased (Fig. 4A). To determine whether FOXO3 activation induces autophagic flux in hMSCs, hMSCs- FOXO3-(A3) were treated with DOX and BafA1 for 16h and MAP1LC3B-II was analyzed by western blot. Indeed, MAP1LC3B-II levels were significantly higher in hMSCs-FOXO3-(A3) treated with DOX and BafA1 when compared to cells treated with BafA1 alone (Fig. 4B; Fig. S5A). To study whether FOXO3 activation also promotes autophagosome formation, the number (spot count) and size (spot area) of MAP1LC3B-positive vesicles was analyzed by fluorescence microscopy in hMSCs-FOXO3-(A3) treated with DOX and BafA1 for 16 h27,32,33 (Fig. 4C). Conditional expression of FOXO3-(A3) increased the number and size of MAP1LC3B-positive punctate indicating increased formation of autophagosomes (Fig. 4C). Next, autophagic flux was analyzed after FOXO3 depletion. FOXO3 knockdown resulted in reduced BafA1-induced accumulation of MAP1LC3BII (Fig. 4D), further supporting the role of FOXO3 in the regulation of autophagy in hMSCs.
Finally, to validate that FOXO3 is necessary to trigger autophagy as a mechanism to reduce increased levels of ROS, we tested whether FOXO3 knockdown affects the autophagic flux in hMSCs treated with H2O2. Changes in autophagy were studied by analyzing MAP1LC3BII levels and by measuring autophagic vacuoles using Cyto-ID. Both MAP1LC3BII levels (Fig. 4E; Fig. S5B) and the number of autophagic vacuoles failed (Fig. 4F) to increase in the response to elevated ROS levels, when expression of FOXO3 was down regulated. Taken together, these data indicate that hMSCs induce FOXO3-mediated autophagy as a mechanism to reduce increased ROS levels that occur during osteoblastic differentiation.
Discussion
Differentiation of hMSCs to osteoblasts is associated with an increase in mitochondrial content and activity, requiring a metabolic shift toward augmented oxidative phosphorylation.20,39 Increased mitochondrial respiration results in elevated levels of free oxygen radicals, which mediate oxidative damage to lipid, DNA and proteins and have been demonstrated to inhibit osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs.16,40,41 To prevent the damage induced by this mitochondrial-respiration by-product, hMSCs activate antioxidant defense mechanisms.20 Here for the first time, we provide molecular details underlying this antioxidant control. We demonstrate that in hMSCs elevated levels of ROS activate FOXO3 serine 294 phosphorylation in a MAPK8-dependent manner. Our data show that FOXO3 induces autophagy as a mechanism to downregulate elevated ROS in hMSCs, which is crucial for their proper differentiation to osteoblasts.
During osteoblast differentiation FOXO3 levels are elevated, corresponding to an increased capacity of hMSCs to deal with oxidative stress. Accordingly, ablation of FOXO3 in hMSCs results in augmented levels of ROS accompanied by a reduction in osteoblast differentiation. The inhibition of the osteoblast differentiation upon FOXO3 knockdown might be a consequence of hMSCs undergoing apoptosis, and indeed we observed elevated cleaved caspase-3 (CASP3) levels under this conditions (data not shown). These findings indicate that FOXO3 provides an important antioxidant defense mechanism for hMSCs and ensures generation of new osteoblasts that are crucial for maintaining proper balance in bone renewal. This is in line with previously demonstrated role of Foxos in the regulation of redox homeostasis in mature osteoblasts in mice.16 Our results show that FOXO3 knockdown partially affects the differentiation of hMCSs toward osteoblasts. We cannot exclude that other FOXO family members present in hMSCs contribute to this process. In line with this, FOXO1 knockdown has been reported to impair osteogenic differentiation of murine pre-osteoblastic cells MC3T3-E1.42
We found that ROS activate FOXO3 in hMSCs through induction of FOXO3 Ser294 phosphorylation and promoting nuclear translocation. ROS-mediated phosphorylation seems to be specific to FOXO3 in hMSCs, as no changes in phosphorylation of Thr223/Ser226 of FOXO4 were detected, the residues previously shown to be phosphorylated upon exposure of NIH3T3 cells to elevated ROS levels12. We cannot exclude the possibility of ROS-mediated FOXO1 phosphorylation, however no residues phosphorylated by ROS were identified for this FOXO family member so far. Thus, there are no tools available to evaluate whether phosphorylation of FOXO1 is modulated by ROS in hMSCs. ROS-mediated activation of FOXO3 is predominantly dependent on MAPK8 since both FOXO3 phosphorylation and translocation to the nucleus were abolished upon the MAPK8 inhibition. Previous reports have shown ROS-dependent phosphorylation of FOXO3 at Ser7 in MCF-7 cells mediated by MAPK11/12/14 kinase.13 Our data indicate that Ser7 is not phosphorylated upon the exposure of hMSCs to ROS. However, we demonstrate that ROS also induces the phosphorylation of MAPK11/12/14 MAP kinase albeit at higher concentration ranges (100-400 µM of H2O2). Inhibition of MAPK11/12/14 kinase also partially abrogates the translocation of FOXO3 to the nucleus upon exposure of hMSCs to the oxidative stress, suggesting that MAPK11/12/14 partially contributes to the ROS-mediated activation of FOXO3. It has been shown in vitro that MAPK11/12/14 can phosphorylate FOXO3 at Ser12, Ser294, Ser344 and Ser425.13 Thus, it is possible that higher levels of free radicals activate the MAPK11/12/14 kinase to enhance antioxidant activity of FOXO3, through phosphorylation of additional serine residues. FOXO3 Ser294 has been demonstrated to be a target of Ras-MAPK1/3 signaling, which is followed by downregulation of FOXO3 activity and induction of tumorigenesis.43 Here we show that ROS do not activate MAPK1/3 in hMSCs, indicating that it is the cellular and environmental context that defines the final outcome of FOXO3-mediated transcription.
FOXO transcription factors are known regulators of autophagy, which in turn contributes to the control of ROS homeostasis.23,25,26 Increased ROS levels induced expression of autophagy-related genes in hMSCs and importantly, a majority of these genes are also FOXO3 transcriptional targets. After FOXO3 depletion, ROS-induced autophagy was impaired, indicating that FOXO3-mediated regulation of autophagy is important for antioxidant defense in hMSCs. Likewise, impairment of autophagy by ATG7 knockdown resulted in a reduced capacity of hMSCs to regulate elevated ROS levels, together with a reduced osteoblast differentiation. This is in line with a recent finding in murine MSC, where inhibition of autophagy with chloroquine promoted H2O2 induced cell death.44 One of the possible mechanisms as to how autophagy could protect hMSCs against oxidative stress is by the clearance of damaged mitochondria.23 Indeed, Yue-Hua Yang et al. have demonstrated that treatment of mouse osteoblasts with H2O2 induced mitochondrial damage, as measured by decrease in the mitochondrial membrane potential. This resulted in engulfment of mitochondria into autophagosomal vacuoles and removal of these damaged organelles by osteoblasts.45
Autophagy has been also shown to be necessary for structural remodeling such as the developmental transitions observed during erythropoiesis.46 Thus, it is possible that FOXO3 regulates autophagy not only as a mechanism to downregulate ROS levels but also for structural remodeling of hMSCs during the osteogenic differentiation. It has been shown that the suppression of autophagy by FIP200 deletion led to decreased osteoblastic colony size and decreased osteoblast nodule size in bone marrow and primary calvaria cultures, respectively.47 These data suggested an inability of osteoblasts to switch from initial proliferation to mineralization upon FIP200 deletion.47
ATG7 knockdown resulted in only a partial inhibition of osteoblast differentiation. It is likely that hMSCs utilize multiple mechanisms to scavenge any excess of free radicals. It has been demonstrated that levels of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD2 and catalase are upregulated during osteogenic differentiation.20 FOXOs are also known regulators of ROS homeostasis through the transcriptional activation of SOD27,48,49 and catalases.8,50 Indeed, our data demonstrate that both SOD2 and catalase mRNA are upregulated during osteogenic differentiation (Fig. S6A), however FOXO3 only induces expression of SOD2 and not catalase in hMSCs (Fig. S6B). It is possible that the transcriptional regulation of catalase in hMSCs is controlled by FOXO1 or FOXO4.11 Thus, FOXOs can govern the antioxidant defense of hMSCs during osteoblast differentiation through induction of antioxidant enzymes and increased autophagic flux. It would be interesting to further investigate whether autophagy and SOD2 are triggered simultaneously or if autophagy acts as an additional mechanism activated when SOD2 is not sufficient to reduce high ROS levels.
Taken together, our findings support a model where, in hMSCs, FOXO3 is required to induce autophagy and thereby reduce elevated ROS levels resulting from the increased mitochondrial respiration during osteoblast differentiation. These new molecular insights provide an important contribution to our better understanding of bone physiology. This may also serve as a basis to consider autophagy modulators as potential therapeutic treatment for diseases such as osteoporosis, where the redox homeostasis in bone is disrupted.
Materials and methods
Antibodies and reagents
The following anti-human antibodies were used: goat anti-actin from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (sc16160), mouse anti-MAP1LC3B was from Nanotools (5F10, 0231-100, recognizing the N-terminus of MAP1LC3B) and mouse anti-tubulin was from Sigma-Aldrich (T9026). Rabbit anti-Atg7 (8558), Rabbit anti-MAPK11/12/14 (9212), rabbit anti-phospho MAPK11/12/14 (9211s), rabbit anti-MAPK8 kinase (9252), rabbit anti-MAPK1/3 (9102) and rabbit anti-phospho MAPK1/3 (9101s) were from Cell Signaling Technology. Rabbit anti-phospho MAPK8 was from Millipore (559309-10T) while mouse anti-CDKN1B was from BD Biosciences (610241). A phospho-specific antibody against pSer294 of FOXO3 was generated by immunizing sheep with the peptide SKWPGpSPTSR, corresponding to residue 289-298 of FOXO3. The serum was affinity purified with the phospho-peptide and absorbed against the non-phospho peptide. It recognized the phosphorylated peptide at 250, 100 and 50 ng and not the non-phosphorylated peptide. Peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Dako. Donkey anti-mouse cy5 secondary antibody was from Jackson (715-175-150). Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), bafilomycin A1 (BafA1), H2O2,N-Acetylcystein (NAC), doxycycline (DOX), doxorubicin and glucose oxidase enzyme (HAO1) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. SB203580 (BML-EI286-0005) and SP600125 (BML-EI305-0050) were from Enzo Life Sciences.
Cell culture and hMSCs differentiation
The human bone marrow MSCs (BM-MSCs) were isolated from bone marrow aspirate collected from a 3-y-old patient for routine diagnostic purposes, as approved by the institutional medical ethics committee. The BM aspirate was filtered through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer to remove cell aggregates and fragments of bone.
BM-MSCs were cultured in α-MEM (Gibco Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% HyClone serum (Gibco Invitrogen), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Gibco Invitrogen), 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco Invitrogen), 1 µg/ml Basic human Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF) (Gibco Invitrogen) and 200 µM L-ascorbic acid phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich). hMSCs-FOXO3-(A3) were maintained in the presence of 0.5 mg/ml G418 (Gibco Invitrogen).
To knock down the expression ATG7 or FOXO3, MSC were transfected with 10 nM of human ATG7 (L-020112-00-0005) or FOXO3 (L-003007000010) RNAi from Thermo Scientific using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen). Cells were transfected 2 times with a 48 h interval between transfections. For osteogenic differentiation the culture medium was replaced with osteogenic differentiation medium 24 h after the last transfection. Where indicated, ATG7 was knockdown by lentiviral transduction using ATG7shRNA (Sigma-Aldrich).
For osteoblast differentiation, hMSCs were cultured during 14 d in DMEM (Gibco, Invitrogen) supplemented with 1% HyClone serum (Gibco Invitrogen), 200 µM L-glutamine (Invitrogen), 10 nM dihydroxyvitamin D3, 10 mM β-glycerolphosphate, 100 nM dexamethasone and 80 µg/ml ascorbic acid phosphate.51 The medium was replaced every 3-4 d.
Alkaline phosphatase staining and activity assays
For ALPL staining cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde at d 14 of differentiation. To verify the efficiency of differentiation the alkaline phosphatase was fluorescently labeled using the Vector Red Alkaline Phosphatase Substrate Kit (Vector Laboratories) according to manufacturer's instructions. To quantify the cell number, the cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. The fluorescence signal corresponding to ALPL levels and nuclear staining was measured using Cellomics ArrayScan VTI (Thermo Scientific; The Netherlands) with a 20x 0.45NA lens. The images were analyzed using Cellomics software. The average ALPL signal intensity per cell was quantified.52
For quantitative ALPL activity determination, cells were lysed in 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 min. ALPL activity was measured by conversion of the p-nitrophenyl phosphate Liquid Substrate System (Sigma-Aldrich). The absorbance was measured at 405 nm and corrected at 655 nm (Bio-rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Values were normalized to a standard ALPL measurement using serial dilutions of calf intestinal ALPI (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS. The same cell lysate used to measure ALPL was stored at −80°C and subsequently used to determine the DNA content with the Quant-It PicoGreen kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Calcium deposition
For qualitative assessment of matrix mineralization, the cell monolayer was fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde, stained for 30 minutes with 0.2% (w/v) Alizarin red S solution (pH 4.2, Sigma-Aldrich) and the images of stained monolayers were taken. To quantify the calcium deposition, 10% cetylpyridinium was added for 60 minutes to extract the calcium-bound Alizarin. Absorbance was measured at 595 nm and corrected at 655 nm.
Cell lines generation
Human bone marrow derived-MSC were immortalized through retroviral transduction with hTERT. Clonal MSC-hTERT lines were generated through limited dilution and were characterized for their morphology, proliferation, CD marker profile and in vitro differentiation potential.
To generate MSC line with inducible expression of constitutively active FOXO3 (FOXO3-A3) MSC-hTERT cells were transduced with lentiviral pInducer vector with neomycin resistance carrying FOXO3-A3. After selection the polyclonal cell population was tested for osteoblast differentiation potential.
Immunoprecipitation and western blot analysis
For immunoprecipitation experiments hMSCs were plated on 100-mm plates and grown to 80 percent confluence. All subsequent steps were performed on ice. Cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2PO4·2H2O and 2 mM KH2PO4 at pH 7.4) after the indicated treatments and incubated for 20 min with 750 μl of extraction buffer (20 mM Tris at pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0,1% SDS and 0,5% DOC) containing 10 mM NaF, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, a Halt™ Protease Inhibitor Cocktail and a Halt™ phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific). The cell lysate was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 12,000 g and the supernatant was collected. The lysate was pre-incubated with protein A–Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare) for 1 h. After the removal of the beads, the lysate was incubated with anti-FOXO3 or FOXO3-Ser294 together with fresh protein A beads for 2 h. Subsequently the beads were washed 3 times in the same extraction buffer. Dried protein A beads were boiled for 5 min with 30 μl Laemmli sample buffer. The supernatant was then collected and subjected to western blotting.
Western blot analysis was performed using standard techniques. In brief, hMSCs were lysed in Laemmli buffer (0.12 M Tris HCL pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 35 mM β–mercaptoethanol) and boiled for 5 min. Equal amounts of total lysate were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore) and incubated with the appropriate antibodies according to the manufacturer's instructions. Membranes were washed, incubated with appropriate peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and developed by ELC (Amersham Pharmacia).
Immunofluorescence analysis
MSC-TERT were plated on glass coverslips, fixed directly after the treatment in 0.1 M phosphate buffer containing 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 min. Thereafter, cells were incubated with 2% BSA for 30 min followed by 1 h incubation with a rabbit anti-FOXO3 antibody (Cell Signaling) and subsequent incubation with a goat-anti-rabbit-Ig antibody labeled with Alexa 488 (Molecular Probes). For nuclear staining DAPI was used. Images were recorded on a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope (Germany). The quantification of FOXO3 positive nuclei was done using the ImageJ Plugin the “Cell counter.” The FOXO3 positive nuclei was calculated as percentage of total nuclei labeled with DAPI.
Array scan imaging
Doxycycline inducible hMSCs- FOXO3-(A3) were plated in a 96-well plate and treated with BafA1 (20 nM) in the presence or absence of DOX (1 ug/ml). Cells were then washed twice with PBS and fixed with cold methanol for 10 min at −20°C. Subsequently, cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated for 1 h with MAP1LC3B antibody at a dilution of 1:50 in PBS with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Cells were then washed with PBS with 1% BSA and incubated for 1 h with donkey anti-mouse Cy5 secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:200 in PBS with 1% BSA. Next, cells were washed twice with PBS and stained with DAPI (1 μg/ml) for 5 min at room temperature. Fifteen images per well were captured in both DAPI and Cy5 channels on a Cellomics ArrayScan VTI (Thermo Scientific; The Netherlands) using a 20 × 0.45NA lens. Images were analyzed using the Cellomics SpotDetector V4 Bioapplication. Autofocussing was carried out on DAPI-stained nuclei. Exposure times were fixed for each individual experiment. Each nucleus was identified as a primary object in the DAPI channel, MAP1LC3B spots were detected within a 24 pixel mask defined around the nucleus. SpotCountPerObject and SpotTotalAreaPerObject were reported and used to determine changes in MAP1LC3B spot morphology.
Flow cytometry analysis
hMSCs were treated with HCQ (20 µM) and H2O2 (100 µM) or DOX (1µg/ml). Cells were then trypsinized and incubated in α-MEM with Cyto-ID Autophagy Detection dye (Enzo Life Sciences, ENZ-51031-0050) at a dilution of 1:500 for 25 min at 37°C. Subsequently, cells were washed and analyzed by flow cytometry. All data were analyzed using FlowJo software.
Reactive oxygen species measurements
hMSCs were incubated for 45 min at 37°C with 20 μM of H2DCFDA (Life Technologies) in PBS with 10% of HyClone serum. After undergoing different treatments, cells were treated with PrestoBlue (Life Technologies) according to manufacturer's protocol to determine cell viability. ROS signal per cell was measured. Measurements were performed using Specramax spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, United Kingdom).
Quantitative real-time PCR
RNA was isolated using RNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. cDNA was generated by reverse transcribing 1 μg of total RNA with SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Quantitative real time PCR was subsequently performed using a Biorad Icycler (Bio-Rad, The Netherlands) with primer pairs for the indicated gene. Quantification was performed relative to the levels of the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and normalized to time point 0 or control conditions. The data analysis was performed using the 2−ΔΔCT method.53 The primer sequences are listed in the Supplementary Table 1.
Statistical analysis
Unpaired 2-sided Student t test or one way ANOVA was used to calculate statistical differences. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Supplementary Material
Abbreviations
- ALPL
alkaline phosphatase, tissue-nonspecific isozyme
- ATG7
autophagy-related 7
- ATG14
autophagy-related 14
- BafA1
bafilomycin
- BNIP3
BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19kDa interacting protein 3
- CASP3
caspase-3
- CDKN1B
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B
- DOX
doxycycline
- FOXO
forkhead box O
- GABARAPL1
GABA type A receptor associated protein like 1
- GAPDH
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- HAO1
hydroxyacid oxidase 1
- HCQ
hydroxychloroquine
- hMSCs
human mesenchymal stem cells
- MAPK 1/3
mitogen-activated protein kinase 1/3
- MAPK8
mitogen-activated protein kinase 8
- MAPK 11/12/14
mitogen-activated protein kinase 11/12/14
- MAP1LC3B/LC3B
microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 β
- NAC
N-acetylcystein
- PARK2
parkin RBR E3 ubiquitin protein ligase
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- SOD2
superoxide dismutase 2
- STK4
serine/threonine-protein kinase 4
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Koen Schepers for help with CD marker profiling of hMSCs-TERT cells. We thank Dr. David Egan and the Cell Screening Center for help with array scan data analysis. We thank M. Croes for advice and help with ALPL activity assays and Alizarin Red S staining. We are also grateful to Dr. Tobias Dansen for useful discussions.
Funding
M.C Gomez- Puerto was supported by a grant of the Dutch Cancer Foundation. While L.P Verhagen, A.K Braat and M.J. Lorenowicz were supported by the Netherlands Institute of Regenerative Medicine.
References
- [1].Manolagas SC. Birth and death of bone cells: basic regulatory mechanisms and implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev [Internet] 2000. [cited 2015July7]; 21:115-37. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10782361; PMID:10782361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Park D, Spencer JA, Koh BI, Kobayashi T, Fujisaki J, Clemens TL, Lin CP, Kronenberg HM, Scadden DT. Endogenous bone marrow MSCs are dynamic, fate-restricted participants in bone maintenance and regeneration. Cell Stem Cell [Internet] 2012. [cited 2015June2]; 10:259-72. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1934590912000616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].James AW. Review of Signaling Pathways Governing MSC Osteogenic and Adipogenic Differentiation. Scientifica (Cairo) [Internet] 2013. [cited 2015June5]; 2013:684736 Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3874981&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Atashi F, Modarressi A, Pepper MS. The role of reactive oxygen species in mesenchymal stem cell adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation: a review. Stem Cells Dev [Internet] 2015. [cited 2015February11]; 24:1150-63. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4424969&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:25603196; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1089/scd.2014.0484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Cadenas E, Davies KJ. Mitochondrial free radical generation, oxidative stress, and aging. Free Radic Biol Med [Internet] 2000. [cited 2015August26]; 29:222-30. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11035250; PMID:11035250; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00317-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Adam-Vizi V, Chinopoulos C. Bioenergetics and the formation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Trends Pharmacol Sci [Internet] 2006. [cited 2015September11]; 27:639-45. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17056127; PMID:17056127; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tips.2006.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Kops GJPL, Dansen TB, Polderman PE, Saarloos I, Wirtz KWA, Coffer PJ, Huang T-T, Bos JL, Medema RH, Burgering BMT. Forkhead transcription factor FOXO3 protects quiescent cells from oxidative stress. Nature [Internet] 2002. [cited 2015April17]; 419:316-21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature01036; PMID:12239572; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature01036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Tan W-Q, Wang K, Lv D-Y, Li P-F. FOXO3 Inhibits Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy through Transactivating Catalase. J Biol Chem [Internet] 2008. [cited 2015June27]; 283:29730-9. Available from: http://www.jbc.org/content/283/44/29730.short; PMID:18772130; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M805514200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Salih DAM, Brunet A. FoxO transcription factors in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis during aging. Curr Opin Cell Biol [Internet] 2008. [cited 2015July6]; 20:126-36. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2387118&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:18394876; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].van der Horst A, Burgering BMT. Stressing the role of FoxO proteins in lifespan and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol [Internet] 2007. [cited 2015March12]; 8:440-50. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm2190; PMID:17522590; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm2190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Essers MAG, Weijzen S, de Vries-Smits AMM, Saarloos I, de Ruiter ND, Bos JL, Burgering BMT. FOXO transcription factor activation by oxidative stress mediated by the small GTPase Ral and MAPK8. EMBO J [Internet] 2004. [cited 2015March24]; 23:4802-12. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=535088&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:15538382; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].van den Berg MCW, van Gogh IJA, Smits AMM, van Triest M, Dansen TB, Visscher M, Polderman PE, Vliem MJ, Rehmann H, Burgering BMT. The small GTPase RALA controls c-Jun N-terminal kinase-mediated FOXO activation by regulation of a JIP1 scaffold complex. J Biol Chem [Internet] 2013. [cited 2016March8]; 288:21729-41. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3724631&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:23770673; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M113.463885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Ho K-K, McGuire VA, Koo C-Y, Muir KW, de Olano N, Maifoshie E, Kelly DJ, McGovern UB, Monteiro LJ, Gomes AR, et al.. Phosphorylation of FOXO3 on Ser-7 by MAPK11/12/14 promotes its nuclear localization in response to doxorubicin. J Biol Chem [Internet] 2012. [cited 2015July7]; 287:1545-55. Available from: http://www.jbc.org/content/287/2/1545.full; PMID:22128155; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M111.284224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Lehtinen MK, Yuan Z, Boag PR, Yang Y, Villén J, Becker EBE, DiBacco S, de la Iglesia N, Gygi S, Blackwell TK, et al.. A conserved MST-FOXO signaling pathway mediates oxidative-stress responses and extends life span. Cell [Internet] 2006. [cited 2015June30]; 125:987-1001. Available from: http://www.cell.com/article/S0092867406005599/fulltext; PMID:16751106; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Siqueira MF, Flowers S, Bhattacharya R, Faibish D, Behl Y, Kotton DN, Gerstenfeld L, Moran E, Graves DT. FOXO1 modulates osteoblast differentiation. Bone [Internet] 2011. [cited 2015June14]; 48:1043-51. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8756328211000238; PMID:21281751; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bone.2011.01.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Ambrogini E, Almeida M, Martin-Millan M, Paik J-H, Depinho RA, Han L, Goellner J, Weinstein RS, Jilka RL, O'Brien CA, et al.. FoxO-mediated defense against oxidative stress in osteoblasts is indispensable for skeletal homeostasis in mice. Cell Metab [Internet] 2010. [cited 2015April16]; 11:136-46. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2819984&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:20142101; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.12.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Leung KS, Fung KP, Sher AH, Li CK, Lee KM. Plasma bone-specific alkaline phosphatase as an indicator of osteoblastic activity. J Bone Joint Surg Br [Internet] 1993. [cited 2015June30]; 75:288-92. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8444951; PMID:8444951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Downs I, Liu J, Aw TY, Adegboyega PA, Ajuebor MN. The ROS scavenger, NAC, regulates hepatic Vα14iNKT cells signaling during Fas mAb-dependent fulminant liver failure. PLoS One [Internet] 2012. [cited 2015September3]; 7:e38051. Available from: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0038051; PMID:22701598; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0038051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].KMAPK1/3sick C, Willoughby D. The antioxidant role of glutathione and N-acetyl-cysteine supplements and exercise-induced oxidative stress. J Int Soc Sports Nutr [Internet] 2005. [cited 2015September3]; 2:38-44. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2129149&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:18500954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Chen C-T, Shih Y-R V, Kuo TK, Lee OK, Wei Y-H. Coordinated changes of mitochondrial biogenesis and antioxidant enzymes during osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells [Internet] 2008. [cited 2015July7]; 26:960-8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18218821; PMID:18218821; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Sobotta MC, Barata AG, Schmidt U, Mueller S, Millonig G, Dick TP. Exposing cells to H2O2: a quantitative comparison between continuous low-dose and one-time high-dose treatments. Free Radic Biol Med [Internet] 2013. [cited 2015September3]; 60:325-35. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23485584; PMID:23485584; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.02.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Park MK, Kim CH, Kim YM, Kang YJ, Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Seo HG, Lee JH, Chang KC. Akt-dependent heme oxygenase-1 induction by NS-398 in C6 glial cells: a potential role for CO in prevention of oxidative damage from hypoxia. Neuropharmacology [Internet] 2007. [cited 2015August9]; 53:542-51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17675106; PMID:17675106; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.06.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Filomeni G, De Zio D, Cecconi F. Oxidative stress and autophagy: the clash between damage and metabolic needs. Cell Death Differ [Internet] 2014. [cited 2015February9]; 22:377-88. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/cdd.2014.150; PMID:25257172; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/cdd.2014.150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Hariharan N, Maejima Y, Nakae J, Paik J, Depinho RA, Sadoshima J. Deacetylation of FoxO by Sirt1 plays an essential role in mediating starvation-induced autophagy in cardiac myocytes. Circ Res [Internet] 2010. [cited 2015July16]; 107:1470-82. Available from: http://circres.ahajournals.org/content/107/12/1470.short; PMID:20947830; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.227371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Sengupta A, Molkentin JD, Yutzey KE. FoxO transcription factors promote autophagy in cardiomyocytes. J Biol Chem [Internet] 2009. [cited 2015April21]; 284:28319-31. Available from: http://www.jbc.org/content/284/41/28319.short; PMID:19696026; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M109.024406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].van der Vos KE, Eliasson P, Proikas-Cezanne T, Vervoort SJ, van Boxtel R, Putker M, van Zutphen IJ, Mauthe M, Zellmer S, Pals C, et al.. Modulation of glutamine metabolism by the PI(3)K-PKB-FOXO network regulates autophagy. Nat Cell Biol [Internet] 2012. [cited 2015June23]; 14:829-37. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb2536; PMID:22820375; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb2536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Levine B. Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell [Internet] 2010. [cited 2014July16]; 140:313-26. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2852113&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:20144757; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Mizushima N. Autophagy: process and function. Genes Dev [Internet] 2007. [cited 2014July14]; 21:2861-73. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18006683; PMID:18006683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Kroemer G, Mariño G, Levine B. Autophagy and the integrated stress response. Mol Cell [Internet] 2010. [cited 2015June1]; 40:280-93. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3127250&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:20965422; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Stankov M V, El Khatib M, Kumar Thakur B, Heitmann K, Panayotova-Dimitrova D, Schoening J, Bourquin JP, Schweitzer N, LevMAPK1/3us M, Welte K, et al.. Histone deacetylase inhibitors induce apoptosis in myeloid leukemia by suppressing autophagy. Leukemia [Internet] 2014. [cited 2015July16]; 28:577-88. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3947652&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:24080946; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/leu.2013.264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].van der Burgh R, Nijhuis L, Pervolaraki K, Compeer EB, Jongeneel LH, van Gijn M, Coffer PJ, Murphy MP, Mastroberardino PG, Frenkel J, et al.. Defects in mitochondrial clearance predispose human monocytes to interleukin-1β hypersecretion. J Biol Chem [Internet] 2014. [cited 2015July16]; 289:5000-12. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3931060&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:24356959; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M113.536920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Klionsky DJ, Abdelmohsen K, Abe A, Abedin MJ, Abeliovich H, Acevedo Arozena A, Adachi H, Adams CM, Adams PD, Adeli K, et al.. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). Autophagy [Internet] 2016. [cited 2016January25]; 12:1-222. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26799652; PMID:26799652; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Klionsky DJ, Abdalla FC, Abeliovich H, Abraham RT, Acevedo-Arozena A, Adeli K, Agholme L, Agnello M, Agostinis P, Aguirre-Ghiso JA, et al.. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy [Internet] 2012. [cited 2014July10]; 8:445-544. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3404883&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Jiang P, Mizushima N. MAP1LC3B- and p62-based biochemical methods for the analysis of autophagy progression in mammalian cells. Methods [Internet] 2015. [cited 2016March8]; 75:13-8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Klionsky DJ, Elazar Z, Seglen PO, Rubinsztein DC. Does bafilomycin A1 block the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes? Autophagy [Internet] 2008. [cited 2016March8]; 4:849-50. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18758232; PMID:18758232; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/auto.6845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Geisler S, Holmström KM, Skujat D, Fiesel FC, Rothfuss OC, Kahle PJ, Springer W. PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy is dependent on VDAC1 and p62/SQSTM1. Nat Cell Biol [Internet] 2010. [cited 2015June18]; 12:119-31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb2012; PMID:20098416; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Matsuda N, Sato S, Shiba K, Okatsu K, Saisho K, Gautier CA, Sou Y-S, Saiki S, Kawajiri S, Sato F, et al.. PINK1 stabilized by mitochondrial depolarization recruits Parkin to damaged mitochondria and activates latent Parkin for mitophagy. J Cell Biol [Internet] 2010. [cited 2015May29]; 189:211-21. Available from: http://jcb.rupress.org/content/189/2/211.short; PMID:20404107; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1083/jcb.200910140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Vives-Bauza C, Zhou C, Huang Y, Cui M, de Vries RLA, Kim J, May J, Tocilescu MA, Liu W, Ko HS, et al.. PINK1-dependent recruitment of Parkin to mitochondria in mitophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet] 2010. [cited 2015March22]; 107:378-83. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/107/1/378.short; PMID:19966284; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0911187107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Wanet A, Arnould T, Najimi M, Renard P. Connecting mitochondria, metabolism and stem cell fate. Stem Cells Dev 2015; Sep 1;24(17):1957-71; PMID: 26134242; http://dx.doi.org/15734681 10.1089/scd.2015.0117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Balaban RS, Nemoto S, Finkel T. Mitochondria, oxidants, and aging. Cell [Internet] 2005. [cited 2014July9]; 120:483-95. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15734681; PMID:15734681; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Giorgio M, Trinei M, Migliaccio E, Pelicci PG. Hydrogen peroxide: a metabolic by-product or a common mediator of ageing signals? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol [Internet] 2007. [cited 2015June8]; 8:722-8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17700625; PMID:17700625; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm2240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Siqueira MF, Flowers S, Bhattacharya R, Faibish D, Behl Y, Kotton DN, Gerstenfeld L, Moran E, Graves DT. FOXO1 modulates osteoblast differentiation. Bone [Internet] 2011. [cited 2015June14]; 48:1043-51. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3109483&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:21281751; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bone.2011.01.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Yang J-Y, Zong CS, Xia W, Yamaguchi H, Ding Q, Xie X, Lang J-Y, Lai C-C, Chang C-J, Huang W-C, et al.. MAPK1/3 promotes tumorigenesis by inhibiting FOXO3 via MDM2-mediated degradation. Nat Cell Biol [Internet] 2008. [cited 2015June30]; 10:138-48. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb1676; PMID:18204439; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb1676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Liu G-Y, Jiang X-X, Zhu X, He W-Y, Kuang Y-L, Ren K, Lin Y, Gou X. ROS activates MAPK8-mediated autophagy to counteract apoptosis in mouse mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Acta Pharmacol Sin [Internet] 2015. [cited 2016February7]; 36:1473-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/aps.2015.101; PMID:26592514; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/aps.2015.101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Yang Y-H, Li B, Zheng X-F, Chen J-W, Chen K, Jiang S-D, Jiang L-S. Oxidative damage to osteoblasts can be alleviated by early autophagy through the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway–implications for the treatment of osteoporosis. Free Radic Biol Med [Internet] 2014. [cited 2015August16]; 77:10-20. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891584914004195; PMID:25224042; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.08.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Mizushima N, Levine B. Autophagy in mammalian development and differentiation. Nat Cell Biol [Internet] 2010. [cited 2015June23]; 12:823-30. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb0910-823; PMID:20811354; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb0910-823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Liu F, Fang F, Yuan H, Yang D, Chen Y, Williams L, Goldstein SA, Krebsbach PH, Guan J-L. Suppression of autophagy by FIP200 deletion leads to osteopenia in mice through the inhibition of osteoblast terminal differentiation. J Bone Miner Res [Internet] 2013. [cited 2015September3]; 28:2414-30. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3805719&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:23633228; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/jbmr.1971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Jacobs KM, Pennington JD, Bisht KS, Aykin-Burns N, Kim H-S, Mishra M, Sun L, Nguyen P, Ahn B-H, Leclerc J, et al.. SIRT3 interacts with the daf-16 homolog FOXO3 in the mitochondria, as well as increases FOXO3 dependent gene expression. Int J Biol Sci [Internet] 2008. [cited 2015August15]; 4:291-9. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2532794&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract; PMID:18781224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Li M, Chiu J-F, Mossman BT, Fukagawa NK. Down-regulation of manganese-superoxide dismutase through phosphorylation of FOXO3 by Akt in explanted vascular smooth muscle cells from old rats. J Biol Chem [Internet] 2006. [cited 2015August15]; 281:40429-39. Available from: http://www.jbc.org/content/281/52/40429.short; PMID:17079231; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M606596200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Awad H, Nolette N, Hinton M, Dakshinamurti S. AMPK and FoxO1 regulate catalase expression in hypoxic pulmonary arterial smooth muscle. Pediatr Pulmonol [Internet] 2014. [cited 2015August15]; 49:885-97. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24167160; PMID:24167160; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/ppul.22919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Pittenger MF. Multilineage Potential of Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Science (80- ) [Internet] 1999. [cited 2014July10]; 284:143-7. Available from: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/284/5411/143.short; PMID:10102814; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.284.5411.143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Prins H-J, Braat AK, Gawlitta D, Dhert WJA, Egan DA, Tijssen-Slump E, Yuan H, Coffer PJ, Rozemuller H, Martens AC. In vitro induction of alkaline phosphatase levels predicts in vivo bone forming capacity of human bone marrow stromal cells. Stem Cell Res [Internet] 2014. [cited 2015May25]; 12:428-40. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873506113001736; PMID:24384458; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.scr.2013.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods [Internet] 2001. [cited 2014July9]; 25:402-8. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202301912629; PMID:11846609; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.