Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: Lab Invest. 2016 Aug 22;96(11):1198–1210. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2016.89

Isolation and characterization of hepatic mast cells from cholestatic rats

Laura Hargrove 2,*, Allyson Graf-Eaton 1,*, Lindsey Kennedy 1, Jennifer Demieville 1, Jennifer Owens 1, Kyle Hodges 3, Brittany Ladd 3, Heather Francis 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC5079802  NIHMSID: NIHMS802006  PMID: 27548803

Abstract

Mast cells (MCs) are immune cells that release histamine and other mediators. MC number increases after bile duct ligation (BDL) and blocking mast cell-derived histamine decrease biliary proliferation. We aimed to isolate and characterize MCs from cholestatic livers. Rats were subjected to BDL starting at 6 hrs and up to 14 days. MC infiltration was evaluated by toluidine blue. BDL rats were perfused using standard collagenase perfusion. Following enzymatic digestion, tissue was passed through a fine gauge needle. Suspensions were incubated with MAb AA4, washed and incubated with goat anti-mouse coated Dynal® beads. MCs were stained with toluidine blue, and in isolated MCs, the expression of FCεRI and MC proteases was measured. The expression of histidine decarboxylase, histamine receptors, VEGF-receptors and TIE 1 and 2 was evaluated by qPCR. Histamine and VEGF-A secretion was measured in MC supernatants. MC purity was evaluated by CK-19, CK-8, albumin, VAP-1 and α-SMA expression. In vitro, cholangiocytes and HSCs were treated with isolated MC supernatants from BDL rats treated with either NaCl or cromolyn sodium (to block MC histamine release) and biliary proliferation and hepatic fibrosis were measured. MCs infiltrate the liver and surround bile ducts starting at day 2. We isolated a virtually pure preparation of mature, functional MCs. TEM images reveal distinct secretory granules and isolated MCs secrete histamine. MCs express FCεRI, chymase, tryptase, RMCPI and RMCPII, but were virtually void of other cell markers. Biliary proliferation and fibrosis increased following treatment with MC supernatants from BDL rats + NaCl and these parameters decreased in cells treated with MC supernatants from BDL + cromolyn sodium. In conclusion, we have isolated and characterized MCs from cholestatic livers. MCs regulate cholestatic liver injury and hepatic fibrosis. This tool provides a better understanding of the paracrine influence of mast cells on biliary/liver pathologies.

Introduction

The liver is composed of parenchymal and non-parenchymal cells and the most prominent cell type in the liver is hepatocytes that are targets of diseases such as hepatitis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis(1) and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatocytes occupy approximately 70–85% of the liver’s cytoplasmic mass and are responsible for the production of bile that is then modified by a second cell type of the liver termed cholangiocytes(2). Cholangiocytes are epithelial cells that line the bile ducts of the liver and represent approximately 3–5% of the liver’s cytoplasmic mass(3). Cholangiocytes are the target cells for diseases known collectively as cholangiopathies and include primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), biliary atresia and cholangiocarcinoma(4, 5). In addition to cholangiocytes and hepatocytes, the liver is comprised of hepatic stellate cells, Kupffer cells and sinusoidal and vascular endothelial cells. Each cell type plays a particular role in liver disease progression by both autocrine and paracrine regulatory mechanisms.

Mast cells are inflammatory cells that can be both residential to the tissue and recruited from the bone marrow during injury or in response to certain signals. Mast cells have been found within the liver during certain pathologies including PSC and PBC(68). By immunohistochemical staining it has been shown that the number of mast cells found in the liver increase during injury or disease progression when compared to normal liver tissue(7, 8). In humans, mast cells are distinguished as either mucosal- or connective tissue-derived and are marked by the proteases, chymase and tryptase(9). Chymase-positive mast cells indicate that they originate or reside in connective tissue, whereas both chymase and tryptase-positive mast cells indicate mucosal mast cells. Similar terminology is used in rodent models. Mast cells from connective tissue in rats are termed rat mast cell protease 1 (RMCP-1) and mucosal mast cells termed RMCP-2(10). Within the mast cell there is a large amount of preformed mediators including histamine, which is released upon activation of a mast cell. Traditionally, mast cell activation occurs via typical IgE/FCεRI receptor binding, however mast cells can also be triggered by the activation of the numerous ligands and G-protein coupled receptors found on their surface including histamine receptors (H1–H4)(10, 11). We have recently demonstrated that mast cell activation and chemoattraction occurs via a stem cell factor/c-kit interaction during cholangiocarcinoma progression(12).

During cholestatic liver injury cholangiocytes proliferate and secrete numerous factors including histamine and vascular endothelial growth factor(13, 14). We have shown that histamine regulates cholangiocyte proliferation via autocrine signaling, which allows for cholangiocyte homeostasis to be maintained(15). During PBC and PSC, patients have increased amounts of circulating histamine in their serum(16) and in rats subjected to bile duct ligation (to induce cholestasis), both serum and cholangiocyte histamine release is increased(14, 17). We have demonstrated that mast cells infiltrate the liver following bile duct ligation (BDL) and that blocking mast cell-derived histamine using cromolyn sodium decreases biliary mass, proliferation and histamine secretion(14). Further, human cholangiocarcinoma tumors exhibit large numbers of mast cells and cromolyn sodium decreases tumor growth(12). Based on these observations we surmise that mast cells play an important role in liver pathology and because there are no successful techniques to isolate and examine intact mast cells from mature rat livers, our aim of this study was to isolate and characterize hepatic mast cells from cholestatic rodent livers.

Materials and Methods

All chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich unless otherwise indicated. Primers and PCR reagents were obtained from Qiagen (SABiosciences, Valencia, CA) and Bio-Rad. Histamine EIA kits were obtained from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI)(14, 15). The antibody, Anti-Rat Mast Cells, clone AR32AA4 (MAb AA4) used to isolate hepatic mast cells was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA), this antibody has been used by other groups to isolate mature mast cells from bone marrow and the peritoneal cavity(18, 19).

Animal model

Because the number of mast cells in normal tissues is relatively low(14), we used male Fisher 344 rats (Charles Rivers, 150 – 175 gm) subjected to bile duct ligation (BDL). BDL surgeries were performed as previously described by us and according to full adherence to local Institutional Animal Care and Usage Committee at Baylor Scott & White Health(14, 20). Animals were sacrificed beginning at 6 hours post BDL and livers were collected at 6 and 12 hours, 1 day and up to 14 days. Liver blocks were collected from the right, left, caudate and quadrate lobes and immediately frozen or fixed in formalin prior to paraffin embedding.

Verification of the presence of hepatic mast cells following BDL

Prior to isolation of mast cells, we performed toluidine blue staining and staining in livers from normal rats and BDL rats (6 hr to 14 days post BDL) to verify the presence and localization of hepatic mast cells(12, 14). To perform toluidine blue staining, paraffin-embedded livers were sliced (4–5 μm) and deparaffanized prior to toluidine blue staining. A fresh stock solution of toluidine blue O (1 g) dissolved in 70% isopropanol (100 ml) was used to make a final working solution (pH 2.0–2.5) containing 5 ml of toluidine blue stock solution mixed with 45 ml of 1% NaCl (pH 2.3). Slides were incubated for 2–3 minutes, washed in distilled water (3×) and quickly dehydrated with 95% ethanol (ETOH) and 100% ETOH (10 dips each). After clearing with xylene (2x, 3 minutes each), slides were mounted with a coverslip and visualized using a light microscope. To determine if hepatic mast cells are in close proximity to intrahepatic bile ducts we performed both immunohistochemistry for the biliary marker, cytokeratin-19 (CK-19; 1:50)(14, 20) followed by toluidine blue staining and in selected sections performed double immunofluorescent labeling for CK-19 and the mast cell marker, MAb AA4 (1:100) as described(14). Staining was visualized using a light microscope or Leica Confocal microscope.

Isolation of mast cells

In the development of our mast cell isolation technique, we adopted numerous experimental steps from the established technique for cholangiocyte isolation (17, 20). Specifically, after incannulation of the portal vein in 14 days post BDL rats (n = 6), an enriched ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA) solution was pumped into the liver to flush out blood followed by a standard calcium/magnesium/collagenase perfusion for 20–30 minute(20). Livers (suspended in 1× hanks buffered solution (HBS)) were placed on an end-to-end rotator for 30 minutes at 4°C. Before enzymatic digestion, the biliary tree was gently scraped and parenchymal (PC) and non-parenchymal cells (NPC) were collected and saved. The biliary tree was discarded and the PC and NPC fractions were combined and digested using a mixture of DNAse (5 mg), Collagenase XI (8 mg) and Hyaluronidase (12 mg) dissolved in standard RPMI 1640 medium (25 ml/liver) for 45 minutes in a shaking water bath at 37°C. Following enzymatic digestion, any remaining tissue was passed through a 22 gauge needle 2× and a 19 gauge needle 2× and finally filtered through a 0.4 μM nylon filter. Pre-coated goat anti-mouse IgG magnetic beads were obtained from New England Bio Labs (Cat # S1431S, Ipswich, MA). The PC/NPC fraction was incubated with 40 μl of the primary antibody, Purified Mouse Anti-Rat Mast Cells; Clone: AR32AA4; Cat #: 551770 (MAb AA4, Fisher Scientific/BD Biosciences) + 1 ml of RPMI 1640 medium + a pinch of DNase (“magic”) for 30 minutes on ice with gentle agitation followed by two washes with 1xHBS. To prepare beads (anti-mouse beads), 10 μl of beads per tube were placed on the magnetic stand and washed 3× with 1XHBS and then placed in “magic” solution to allow for a total of 1 ml of bead mixture per tube. After addition of bead mixture, tubes were mixed gently and placed in ice bucket on shaker for 30 additional minutes. The number of mast cells was determined by counting the number of toluidine blue-positive mast cells in the total cell population before immunomagnetic separation and the number of toluidine blue-positive mast cells after separation. Counting was performed manually using a light microscope. This method allows for the identification of immature, mature and very mature mast cells without inducing mast cell degranulation. Supplemental Figure 1 depicts the workflow performed to isolate hepatic mast cells from rat livers.

Morphological evaluation of hepatic mast cells

Toluidine Blue Staining

Following magnetic bead binding, cell smears were made from by placing 100 μl of cells onto a glass slide and allowed to air dry. Cells were fixed with cold acetone (10 dips) prior to toluidine blue staining as described above. After clearing with xylene (2x, 3 minutes each), slides were mounted with a coverslip and visualized using a light microscope.

Transmission Electron Microscopy

Cell isolates were prepared for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) by being gently pelleted in a 1 ml Eppendorf tube and resuspended in the following fixative: 2% paraformaldehyde/2.5% glutaraldehyde/100mM phosphate buffer (all EM grade). Cells were fixed for 1 hr at room temperature with gentle rocking. After fixation, cells were pelleted and resuspended and centrifuged. Fixed cells were sent to Dr. Wandy Beatty (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) for TEM analysis and image collection. The morphological changes of cell and mitochondria were observed by TEM. A total of 1Å~106 of cells were collected and subjected to fixation with 3% fresh glutaraldehyde and 1.5% paraformaldehyde solution at 4°C for 1 h, next to post-fixation with 1% osmium tetroxide and 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide solution at 4°C for 1.5 h, then to dehydration with a graded series of ethanol solution, and finally to embed in Epon-618 after dehydration. Ultrathin sections were cut to stain with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and observed under TEM (EM- 208 type, Phillips, WI, USA). The morphology of isolated hepatic mast cells was compared to cultured mast cells obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) that were fixed as described above.

Characterization of hepatic mast cells

Cell isolates were evaluated for typical markers of mast cells markers and both parenchymal and non-parenchymal cells by quantitative RT-PCR(12, 14). We measured the expression of the specific mast cell markers including c-kit, FCεR1, rat mast cell protease 1 (RMCP-I) and -II, chymase and tryptase(12, 14). Immunofluorescence was performed in cell smears from isolated mast cells for the following: FcεR1, chymase and tryptase. Further characterization of mast cells was performed by measuring the expression of the following cellular markers: histidine decarboxylase (HDC), histamine receptors (H1–H4), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors, VEGFR2/R3 and angiopoietin receptors, Tie-1 and Tie-2 by real-time PCR or RT-PCR(12, 14, 15). Other cellular markers measured included the cholangiocyte marker, cytokeratin-19 (CK-19), the hepatocyte marker, CK-8, vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) and α-SMA (hepatic stellate cell marker). Real-time PCR was performed as described in 1 μg of total RNA; GAPDH was used as a housekeeping gene. The expression of all markers in isolated hepatic mast cells was compared to total liver RNA. Immunofluorescence was performed as previously described in cell smears from isolated mast cells for CK-19 and CK-8 and visualized on a Leica Confocal Microscope.

Evaluation of histamine and VEGF secretion from isolated mast cell supernatants

To determine if isolated mast cells are functionally active we treated mast cells with T-Cell Culture Supplement with conA (T-STIM, 100 μl/ml) to induce degranulation and incubated cells at 37° for 60 minutes prior to collecting supernatants. Histamine release was measured by enzyme immuno-linked assays (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI,)(14, 15). Activated mast cells release numerous factors including growth factors like VEGF(21), therefore, we also evaluated VEGF secretion by EIA (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) in our isolated mast cells treated cells with T-Cell Culture Supplement with ConA (T-STIM, 100 μl/ml) and incubated at 37° for 60 minutes.

Detection of mast cells in other models of liver injury

Toluidine blue was performed as described in liver sections from normal rats subjected to 70% partial hepatectomy (PH) at 3 days and in normal rats fed taurocholic acid for 1 week(14, 22, 23). In human tissues from late stage PSC patients with cirrhosis we performed toluidine blue to detect mast cell infiltration.

In vitro evaluation of mast cell-derived histamine on biliary proliferation and fibrosis

Finally, to demonstrate that mast cells and mast cell-derived histamine can alter cholangiocyte response, cultured cholangiocytes were treated with isolated mast cell supernatants obtained from 14 day BDL rats treated with either sodium chloride (NaCl) or cromolyn sodium (to block mast cell histamine release)(12, 14) and we measured (i) proliferation by MTS assay and inflammatory cytokine expression for IL-10 and TGF–β1 by real-time PCR. Further, to demonstrate that mast cells trigger the fibrogenic response, human hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) were treated with isolated mast cell supernatants obtained from 14 day BDL rats treated with either sodium chloride (NaCl) or cromolyn sodium and the expression of fibrosis markers such as fibronectin, c and α-SMA were evaluated by real-time PCR.

Results

Hepatic mast cell numbers are increased following BDL and found in close proximity to bile ducts

Following BDL, hepatic mast cells infiltrate the liver starting at day 2 and peaking at day 7. After a peak at 7 days post BDL, a steady number of hepatic mast cells are found that continues from day 8 through day 14. Representative images of mast cell infiltration are found in Figure 1 beginning at 6 hours through day 14. Hepatic mast cells (red arrows) are found in close proximity to bile ducts (black arrows). Interestingly, mast cells do not appear until bile ducts begin to develop and this is coupled with an increase in ductal mass suggesting that mast cells infiltrate the damaged liver to support the increased demand of the proliferating biliary epithelium. Supplemental Figure 2 graphically demonstrates the number of toluidine blue-positive mast cells both as average per lobe (4 lobes counted) and in total mast cell number in all 4 lobes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Mast cell infiltration in normal rats subjected to BDL. By toluidine blue staining mast cell infiltration was tracked from 6 hrs to 14 days post-BDL. Mast cells were counted in right, left, caudate and quadrate liver lobes and were found in close proximity to bile ducts. Representative images for each time point collected are shown. Red arrows indicate mast cells and black arrows depict bile ducts. Images are 10× magnification.

In BDL day 14 liver sections we performed immunofluorescent staining for AA4 and CK-19 (Figure 2A) and immunohistochemistry for CK-19 coupled with toluidine blue staining (Figure 2B) and found that mast cells were in close proximity to bile ducts, but are not found within the hepatocyte parenchyma. These data demonstrate that mast cells infiltrate the liver following BDL and further provide the rationale to isolate hepatic mast cells from BDL rodent livers.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Localization of hepatic mast cells at BDL day 14. By immunofluorescence (A) and immunohistochemistry for CK-19 coupled with toluidine blue staining (B), mast cells are found in close proximity to bile ducts and not within the hepatocyte parenchyma. (A) Triple labeled immunofluorescence was performed in BDL 14 liver sections for CK-19 (green), AA4 (red) and DAPI (blue); and mast cells are marked by white arrows. (B) Immunohistochemistry for CK-19 and subsequent toluidine blue staining show that mast cells are in close proximity to bile ducts and not found near hepatocytes (circled area is enlarged in the box). (Images are 40× (immunofluorescence) and 10× (CK-19/toluidine blue) magnification.

Hepatic mast cells are isolated from liver digests with MAb AA4

Isolated mast cells were obtained from BDL rats at day 14 since this appears to be a time when the influx of mast cells has stabilized and the wound has healed in the bile duct and bile duct mass is steady. After enzymatic digestion and incubation with the specific mast cell antibody, MAb AA4, we isolated a population of intact mast cells as shown in Figure 3 by toluidine blue staining. The technique allows for the isolation of intact mast cells as noted by the multiple granules found within the mast cells (marked by black arrows, magnetic beads are marked by red arrows). The purity, number, and size of isolated mast cells obtained from BDL 14 day rats are provided in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Isolation of hepatic mast cells from BDL post 14 days. By enzymatic digestion and magnetic bead binding a virtually pure population of mast cells was obtained from BDL rat liver day 14. Toluidine blue staining indicates a population of mature mast cells as shown by intact granules (black arrows, beads are indicated by red arrows). Image is 20× magnification. The purity of isolated mast cells (~95%) was determined by counting toluidine positive blue mast cells prior to bead attachment and after. The total number of isolated mast cells totaled 2.12 million/ml and the average size was 8.2 μM.

Characterization of hepatic mast cells

By TEM, isolated hepatic mast cells have a similar morphology when compared to cultured mast cells. Isolated mast cells (Figure 4, right image) display typical membrane folds (outlined in blue) indicated by the green arrows. Further, intact granules are found both within and outside of the membrane and are indicated by the red arrows.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Characterization of isolated hepatic mast cells by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM was performed in both cultured mast cells (left image) and isolated mast cell preparations (right image). Typical membrane folds (green) and granules (red) that are found in mature mast cells are seen in the isolated mast cell preparations.

Isolated mast cell populations were further verified by immunofluorescent staining for FCεR1, chymase and tryptase as shown in Figure 5A. By real-time PCR we found that isolated mast cells from rats with BDL 14 days expressed large amounts of mast cell markers including c-kit, FCεR1, chymase, tryptase, RMCP-I and RMCP-II when compared to total liver RNA (Figure 5B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Characterization of isolated hepatic mast cells by (A) immunofluorescence and (B) real-time PCR for mast cell markers. (A) Double immunofluorescence was performed in cell smears from isolated mast cell preparations for the following markers: FCεR1, chymase and tryptase along with DAPI. Isolated mast cell preparations express FCεR1, chymase and tryptase. (B) By real-time PCR the expression of c-kit, FCεR1, chymase, tryptase, RMCP-I and RMCP-II are upregulated in isolated mast cells compared to total liver RNA. Images were obtained on a Leica Confocal Microscope and are 20× magnification. Data are mean ± SE of 6 experiments. *p<0.05 versus total liver.

Next we examined our isolated mast cells for markers of histamine, VEGF and angiopoietin receptors by real-time PCR. The expression of histidine decarboxylase (HDC), H1HR, H2HR and H4HR are upregulated in isolated mast cell RNA compared to total liver (Figure 6A). There was no significant change in H3HR between isolated mast cell RNA and total liver. Markers for VEGF-R2, VEGF-R3, TIE 1and TIE 2 were increased in isolated mast cells compared to total liver demonstrating that isolated hepatic mast cells have machinery for the production of growth factors (Figure 6B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Characterization of isolated hepatic mast cells by real-time PCR for mast cell markers and other receptor ligands. Real-time PCR was performed in total liver and isolated mast cell preparations for HDC and the histamine receptors, H1–H4 HR (A) along with VEGF-R2, VEGF-R3, TIE 1 and TIE 2 (B). Isolated mast cells express significantly higher levels of mast cell markers, HDC, HRs (except H3HR), VEGF-R2, VEGF-R3, TIE 1 and TIE 2 when compared to total liver RNA. Data are mean ± SE of 8 experiments. *p<0.05 versus total liver.

Mast cells primarily contain histamine in their granules and, upon activation, release large amounts of histamine. In addition, mast cells secrete many factors including VEGF. Histamine secretion is significantly increased in mast cell supernatants following T-stim stimulation (to induce degranulation) when compared to un-stimulated cells (Figure 7A), whereas although our isolated mast cells express VEGF receptors (Figure 6B), VEGF secretion was relatively unchanged in our isolated hepatic mast cell supernatants (Figure 7B).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Evaluation of secretions released from mast cells by EIA. Isolated mast cells were incubated with T-stim to induce degranulation prior to the evaluation of histamine and VEGF-A. (A) Histamine release is increased in isolated mast cells stimulated with T-stim compared to un-stimulated cells; whereas (B) VEGF-A levels are unchanged. Data are mean ± SE of 12 experiments. *p<0.05 versus –T-stim.

To determine if our isolated mast cells are pure we measured the expression of CK-19, albumin, CK-8, VAP-1 and α-SMA in total liver and isolated mast cell RNA by real-time PCR. We found little to no expression (less than “1” in all genes evaluated) of these markers in our isolated mast cells when compared to total liver (Figure 8A). Further, the expression of the biliary marker, CK-19 (red) is absent in isolated mast cells as demonstrated by immunofluorescence for CK-19 and FCεR1 (green) shown in Figure 8B. Similarly, the hepatocyte marker, CK-8 (red) is also absent in isolated mast cells shown by immunofluorescence (Figure 8C). Taken together, these results demonstrate that our isolated mast cells are virtually pure as they are void of other cellular markers.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Measurement of parenchymal and non-parenchymal proteins. (A) The gene expression of CK-19, albumin, CK-8, VAP-1, α-SMA was measured by real-time PCR. Isolated mast cells express very small amounts of these markers compared to total liver. (B) By immunofluorescence isolated mast cells were void of CK-19 and CK-8 protein. Cells were labeled for FCεR1 (green), CK-19 or CK-8 (red) and DAPI (blue). Data are mean ± SE of 3 experiments. *p<0.05 versus total liver. Images were obtained on a Leica Confocal Microscope and are 20× magnification.

Mast cell infiltration in other liver injury models

Hepatic mast cells were detected in various models of liver injury including 70% PH, Mdr2−/− mice and in human tissues from PSC patients. In Figure 9, toluidine blue positive mast cells are found in normal rat liver following 70% PH at 3 days (Figure 9A) and in normal rats fed the bile acid, taurocholate for 1 week (Figure 9B). In human PSC, mast cells are present as indicated by the red arrows (Figure 9C). These data support the concept that mast cells infiltrate in models of rodent and human liver damage and injury and presumably play a detrimental role in these pathologies.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

By toluidine blue and immunohistochemistry we identified mast cells in other models of liver injury. (A) Toluidine blue positive mast cells are found in the rat liver following 70% PH (3 days) and in normal rats fed taurocholic acid for 1 week (B). (C) In human livers from patients with PSC coupled with cirrhosis mast cells are shown by toluidine blue staining. Red arrows mark mast cells. Images are 20× and 10× magnification.

Effect of mast cells on cholangiocyte proliferation in vitro

To demonstrate that hepatic mast cells play a role in the biliary responses seen after liver injury, we examined the paracrine effect that mast cells and mast cell-derived histamine have on cholangiocyte proliferation and inflammation, in vitro (Figure 10A). When cholangiocytes were stimulated with isolated mast cell supernatants collected from BDL 14 day rats treated with NaCl, cholangiocyte proliferation and the expression of IL-10 and TGF-β1 significantly increased compared to untreated cholangiocytes (Figure 10B). However, when cholangiocytes were treated with isolated mast cell supernatants from BDL + cromolyn sodium rats (blocking mast cell-derived histamine release), biliary proliferation and pro-inflammatory cytokines were significantly decreased (Figure 10B) suggesting that mast cells and mast cell-derived histamine regulate biliary proliferation and response. To demonstrate that mast cell-derived histamine is critical to fibrosis progression, cultured HSCs were also treated with mast cell supernatants from BDL rats, which induced an increase in fibronectin, collagen type-1a, and α-SMA gene expression. These markers were decreased when HSCs were stimulated with mast cell supernatants from BDL rats treated with cromolyn sodium blocking mast cell-derived histamine (Figure 10C). These data strongly implicate mast cells in the regulation of biliary proliferation, inflammation and hepatic fibrosis.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

In vitro studies were performed in cultured cholangiocytes and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). (A) Mast cells were isolated BDL rats treated with saline or cromolyn sodium and supernatants were obtained. Cultured cholangiocytes or HSCs were then treated with 0.1% BSA (basal) or isolated mast cell supernatants from the two groups and proliferation, inflammation and fibrosis markers were measured. (B) Cholangiocyte proliferation and IL-10 and TGF-β1 expression was increased following stimulation with isolated mast cell supernatants from BDL rats compared to basal treatment and in cholangiocytes stimulated with isolated mast cell supernatants from BDL rats treated with cromolyn sodium, biliary proliferation and the pro-inflammatory cytokines were significantly decreased. (C) Fibrosis markers, fibronectin, collagen type-1a and α-SMA expression were increased in HSCs following stimulation with isolated mast cell supernatants from BDL rats compared to basal treatment and in HSCs stimulated with isolated mast cell supernatants from BDL rats treated with cromolyn sodium, fibronectin, collagen type-1a and α-SMA were significantly decreased. Data are mean ± SE of 6 experiments for MTS assay and 3 experiments for real-time PCR. *p<0.05 versus 0.1% BSA, #p<0.05 versus treatment with MC supernatant BDL 14 day NaCl.

Discussion

Mast cells have notoriously been thought of as the “allergy-mediating” cell that regulates the histaminergic responses when activated; however, it is now more recognized that mast cells contribute to a larger area of pathologies including liver diseases(2426). To date, there are no protocols for the selection and isolation of mast cells from mature rodent livers. Our technique has been modified from established techniques used for isolating mast cells from fetal liver, peritoneal cavities and bone marrow(18, 19). Since our work and others have demonstrated that mast cells are found in the liver following injury or during repair(1, 8, 12, 14), development of this tool is warranted and our technique successfully isolates mature hepatic mast cells.

Since mast cells are low in number in tissues during a homeostatic state, we induced injury to the liver by performing BDL at different time points starting at 6 hrs and up to 14 days. BDL induces ductal proliferation in response to the injured duct(20, 27), and subsequently there is an infiltration of mast cells beginning approximately 2–3 days post-BDL shown in Figure 1. In support of our findings, mast cells are also found in other models of liver injury and repair including following carbon tetrachloride treatment(28), alcohol feeding(29) and during liver regeneration(30). Since mast cells do not mature and differentiate until they reach their tissue of destination, the contents of mast cells may differ between the liver and other organs(25). The hepatic mast cells that we have isolated from BDL rat livers are positive for both RMCP-I and RMCP-II demonstrating that their origin is both mucosal and connective-tissue derived. By PCR and immunofluorescence, we found that the isolated mast cells were void of parenchymal and non-parenchymal cell markers as well as mesenchymal cell markers demonstrating that these cells are a pure population of mast cells.

Mast cells typically migrate to the origin of a wound or damage and therefore it is not surprising to see hepatic mast cells surrounding the reactive, proliferating bile ducts in rats following BDL. We did not detect mast cells in the periphery of the liver or around hepatocytes and this is consistent with other work demonstrating the presence of mast cells around bile ducts and vessel walls(7, 11, 31). The locality of mast cells is important to demonstrate since, upon activation, they will release numerous pre-formed mediators and other components into the local tissue environment thus inducing a paracrine effect on the resident cell types(32). The paracrine effects of mast cell migration and activation has been demonstrated to occur via stem cell factor (SCF)-related signaling(33) and our previous studies have shown that treatment with mast cell stabilizers like cromolyn sodium reduces the bile duct and cholangiocyte proliferative responses, thereby identifying mast cells as a paracrine regulator of cholangiocyte hyperplasia(14).

The surface of mast cells is coated with numerous receptor-binding sites with FcεR1 being the most abundant(26). Numerous studies have demonstrated that the surface of mast cells also contains receptors for growth factors and G-protein coupled receptors, which upon binding can induce the degranulation of mast cells(11, 34). Our studies demonstrate that our isolated hepatic mast cells express typical mast cell markers including c-kit, FcεR1, chymase, tryptase and the histamine receptors, H1–H4. In addition we found non-traditional receptors including VEGF-R2/R3 and TIE1/2, which is supported by studies demonstrating that other tissue-specific mast cells express these growth factor receptors. Human mast cells have been shown to express VEGF-A, VEGF-C and VEGF-D along with VEGF receptor type 1 and 2(35, 36). Further, in human mast cells, migration has been found to be TIE-1 mediated and both basophils and mast cells express this receptor(37). In our study we demonstrated that our isolation technique yields a relatively pure population of functionally active hepatic mast cells. To verify this we measured the expression of several other typical liver cell markers including CK-19, CK-8 and α-SMA that were highly upregulated in total liver (containing cholangiocytes, hepatocytes, sinusoidal cells and hepatic stellate cells), but were almost void in the isolated mast cell RNA.

Mast cells are composed primarily of granules (seen visibly in both Figures 3 and 4) that contain preformed mediators like histamine, serotonin, tryptase and heparin(38). In addition, newly formed lipid mediators can also be released from mast cells including prostaglandin D2 and platelet-activating factor as well as cytokines and chemokines(11, 38). Many of these factors can induce paracrine alterations on the resident cells and tissue/organ response. The primary mediator released is histamine, which plays an important role in not only allergic responses, but also in liver diseases as we have previously demonstrated(12, 14, 15, 17, 20). Histamine is secreted in small amounts from cholangiocytes (that contain the machinery for histamine synthesis), which induces an autocrine regulation of hyperplastic and neoplastic growth(14, 15, 17). Here we found that our isolated mast cells release large amounts of histamine following degranulation with T-stim; however, the levels of VEGF were unchanged in our isolated mast cells which was surprising since the expression of VEGF receptors was upregulated on isolated mast cells. While our isolated mast cells did not release VEGF, it has been shown that VEGF is secreted from bone marrow in vitro-derived mast cells when stimulated with IgE(39). Further, in human mast cells challenged with coricotropin-releasing hormone there was increased VEGF release(40). In our study we challenged our mast cells with T-STIM to induce degranulation and our mast cells were taken ex vivo from rat livers, thus potentially explaining the differences in our findings. In support of this, it has been demonstrated that the contents of mast cells may differ between the liver and other organs as well as compounds used to challenge mast cells(25).

Hepatic mast cells can be found in numerous models of liver injury or repair. Besides our work demonstrating that mast cells infiltrate the liver following BDL and during cholangiocarcinoma progression(12, 14), here we demonstrate that mast cells are present (i) during liver regeneration as shown in the 70% PH model; (ii) in rats fed the bile acid, taurocholate for 1 week; and (iii) in liver sections from human PSC associated with cirrhosis. It has also been noted that mast cells may play a role in allograft rejection during liver resection or transplantation. In this study, the authors found that a crosstalk exists between mast cells other cells including hepatocytes and induction of mast cell degranulation induces hepatocyte proliferation, thus contributing positively to cellular repopulation and liver regeneration(30). Similar to our findings, mast cells have been noted to increase in number during PSC progression(7, 33) in both rodent models and human tissues. In humans, increased stem cell factor (SCF) from cholangiocytes may induce infiltration of c-kit positive mast cells inducing a paracrine stimulation of fibrosis-promoting cells. Further, mast cells may begin to synthesize and express fibrogenic factors such as TGF-β thus promoting hepatic fibrosis(33). This work correlates with our study regarding mast cell infiltration into cholangiocarcinoma tumors via SCF/c-kit interactions(12). Taken together, mast cells should be considered as a relevant and important player in liver disease and progression.

Since we have demonstrated that mast cells infiltrate the liver following BDL and that treatment with cromolyn sodium decreases both mast cell infiltration and mast cell histamine release, we lastly set out to determine the direct effects of isolated mast cells on biliary proliferation and fibrosis. In cholangiocytes stimulated with mast cell supernatants collected from BDL rats, biliary proliferation increased significantly compared to untreated cholangiocytes. More interesting, when cholangiocytes were treated with mast cell supernatants collected from BDL rats treated with cromolyn sodium, these factors decreased suggesting that mast cell-derived histamine directly contributes to the proliferative response of cholangiocytes. Further, we found that HSCs were also altered by stimulation with isolated mast cell supernatants. Specifically, HSC collagen content and fibronectin expression is decreased following treatment with mast cell supernatants from BDL rats treated with cromolyn sodium compared to HSCs stimulated with mast cells from BDL rats treated with NaCl. This data is supported by the findings from Tsuneyama, et al. showing that mast cells induce fibrogenic factors(33). In addition, an in vitro study has demonstrated that when HSCs were treated with cromolyn sodium there was a significant reduction in collagen accumulation and TGF-β associated EMT and hepatocyte senescence suggesting that cromolyn sodium may be a strong therapeutic target for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis(41).

In summary, we have developed a technique to isolate a pure population of hepatic mast cells from rat livers that are functionally active. It is becoming increasingly evident that mast cells are key regulators and target cells in a number of cholangiopathies and fibrotic-driven pathologies within the liver. Thus, this protocol will enhance our study and evaluation of the effects that mast cells induce in liver diseases. Further, by using this technique we can fully investigate the paracrine role that mast cells play during liver disease along with their potential effects on other liver cell types including cholangiocytes and hepatic stellate cells, as we have shown in our study. This could be taken further to also study the role of mast cells with regards to hepatocytes or vascular and sinusoidal endothelial cells. Since it’s not completely understood if infiltrated mast cells in the liver are “good” or “bad” cells, this tool will enable our future studies to answer this question and increase our knowledge of the functional role that mast cells play during hepatic disease progression.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3

Acknowledgments

Financial support: Portions of this work were supported by (i) a VA Merit Award (1I01BX003031) from the United States Department of Veteran’s affairs, Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service and an RO1 from NIH NIDDK (1R01DK108959) (HF); (ii) funds from the PSC Partners Seeking a Cure (HF); (iii) a Scott and White Research Mentor Award (HF) and (ii) the Dr. Nicholas C. Hightower Centennial Chair of Gastroenterology from Scott & White Health. This research was supported in part by the Veterans Health Administration. The contents do not represent the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

Abbreviations

α-SMA

alpha smooth muscle actin

BDL

bile duct ligation

CK-19

cytokeratin-19

CK-8

cytokeratin 8

ETOH

ethanol

HDC

histidine decarboxylase

HR

histamine receptor

MAb AA4

Anti-Rat Mast Cells, clone AR32AA4

MTS

MTT 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

MC

mast cell

NaCl

sodium chloride

NPC

nonparenchymal cell

PBC

primary biliary cholangitis

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

PC

parenchymal cell

PSC

primary sclerosing cholangitis

RMCP

rat mast cell protease

RNA

ribonucleic acid

T-STIM

T-Cell Culture Supplement with ConA

TEM

transmission electron microscopy

VAP-1

vascular adhesion protein

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplemental material is available on Laboratory Investigation’s web site.

References

  • 1.Machado MV, Diehl AM. Pathogenesis of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2016 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tanimizu N, Mitaka T. Morphogenesis of liver epithelial cells. Hepatol Res. 2016 doi: 10.1111/hepr.12654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alpini G, Prall RT, LaRusso NF. The pathobiology of biliary epithelia. In: Arias IM, Boyer JL, Chisari FV, Fausto N, Jakoby W, Schachter D, Shafritz DAD, editors. The Liver; Biology & Pathobiology, 4E. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. pp. 421–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lazaridis KN, LaRusso NF. The Cholangiopathies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(6):791–800. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.O’Hara SP, Tabibian JH, Splinter PL, LaRusso NF. The dynamic biliary epithelia: molecules, pathways, and disease. J Hepatol. 2013;58(3):575–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Farrell DJ, Hines JE, Walls AF, Kelly PJ, Bennett MK, Burt AD. Intrahepatic mast cells in chronic liver diseases. Hepatology. 1995;22(4 Pt 1):1175–81. doi: 10.1016/0270-9139(95)90627-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ishii M, Iwai M, Harada Y, Morikawa T, Okanoue T, Kishikawa T, et al. A role of mast cells for hepatic fibrosis in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatol Res. 2005;31(3):127–31. doi: 10.1016/j.hepres.2005.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Satomura K, Yin M, Shimizu S, Kato Y, Nagano T, Komeichi H, et al. Increased chymase in livers with autoimmune disease: colocalization with fibrosis. Journal of Nippon Medical School = Nippon Ika Daigaku zasshi. 2003;70(6):490–5. doi: 10.1272/jnms.70.490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ranieri G, Ammendola M, Patruno R, Celano G, Zito FA, Montemurro S, et al. Tryptase-positive mast cells correlate with angiogenesis in early breast cancer patients. Int J Oncol. 2009;35(1):115–20. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hakim-Rad K, Metz M, Maurer M. Mast cells: makers and breakers of allergic inflammation. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;9(5):427–30. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32832e9af1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Halova I, Draberova L, Draber P. Mast cell chemotaxis - chemoattractants and signaling pathways. Frontiers in immunology. 2012;3:119. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Johnson C, Huynh V, Hargrove L, Kennedy L, Graf-Eaton A, Owens J, et al. Inhibition of Mast Cell-Derived Histamine Decreases Human Cholangiocarcinoma Growth and Differentiation via c-Kit/Stem Cell Factor-Dependent Signaling. Am J Pathol. 2016;186(1):123–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gaudio E, Barbaro B, Alvaro D, Glaser S, Francis H, Ueno Y, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates rat cholangiocyte proliferation via an autocrine mechanism. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(4):1270–82. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kennedy LL, Hargrove LA, Graf AB, Francis TC, Hodges KM, Nguyen QP, et al. Inhibition of mast cell-derived histamine secretion by cromolyn sodium treatment decreases biliary hyperplasia in cholestatic rodents. Lab Invest. 2014;94(12):1406–18. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2014.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Francis H, DeMorrow S, Venter J, Onori P, White M, Gaudio E, et al. Inhibition of histidine decarboxylase ablates the autocrine tumorigenic effects of histamine in human cholangiocarcinoma. Gut. 2012;61(5):753–64. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gittlen SD, Schulman ES, Maddrey WC. Raised histamine concentrations in chronic cholestatic liver disease. Gut. 1990;31:96–9. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.1.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Francis HL, DeMorrow S, Franchitto A, Venter JK, Mancinelli RA, White MA, et al. Histamine stimulates the proliferation of small and large cholangiocytes by activation of both IP(3)/Ca(2+) and cAMP-dependent signaling mechanisms. Lab Invest. 2012;92(2):282–94. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2011.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jamur MC, Grodzki AC, Moreno AN, de de Mello LF, Pastor MV, Berenstein EH, et al. Identification and isolation of rat bone marrow-derived mast cells using the mast cell-specific monoclonal antibody AA4. J Histochem Cytochem. 2001;49(2):219–28. doi: 10.1177/002215540104900209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jamur MC, Grodzki AC, Moreno AN, Swaim WD, Siraganian RP, Oliver C. Immunomagnetic isolation of rat bone marrow-derived and peritoneal mast cells. J Histochem Cytochem. 1997;45(12):1715–22. doi: 10.1177/002215549704501215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Francis H, Franchitto A, Ueno Y, Glaser S, DeMorrow S, Venter J, et al. H3 histamine receptor agonist inhibits biliary growth of BDL rats by downregulation of the cAMP-dependent PKA/ERK1/2/ELK-1 pathway. Lab Invest. 2007;87(5):473–87. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ribatti D, Guidolin D, Marzullo A, Nico B, Annese T, Benagiano V, et al. Mast cells and angiogenesis in gastric carcinoma. Int J Exp Pathol. 2010;91(4):350–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2010.00714.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lesage G, Glaser SS, Gubba S, Robertson WE, Phinizy JL, Lasater J, et al. Regrowth of the rat biliary tree after 70% partial hepatectomy is coupled to increased secretin-induced ductal secretion. Gastroenterology. 1996;111(6):1633–44. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(96)70027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mancinelli R, Onori P, Gaudio E, Franchitto A, Carpino G, Ueno Y, et al. Taurocholate feeding to bile duct ligated rats prevents caffeic acid-induced bile duct damage by changes in cholangiocyte VEGF expression. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2009;234(4):462–74. doi: 10.3181/0808-RM-255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bachelet I, Levi-Schaffer F, Mekori YA. Mast cells: not only in allergy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2006;26(3):407–25. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2006.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Beaven MA. Our perception of the mast cell from Paul Ehrlich to now. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:11–25. doi: 10.1002/eji.200838899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Boyce JA. Mast cells: beyond IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111(1):24–32. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marzioni M, Glaser SS, Francis H, Phinizy JL, LeSage G, Alpini G. Functional heterogeneity of cholangiocytes. Semin Liver Dis. 2002;22(3):227–40. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Akiyoshi H, Terada T. Mast cell, myofibroblast and nerve terminal complexes in carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhotic rat livers. J Hepatol. 1998;29(1):112–9. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(98)80185-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wimberly AL, Forsyth CB, Khan MW, Pemberton A, Khazaie K, Keshavarzian A. Ethanol-induced mast cell-mediated inflammation leads to increased susceptibility of intestinal tumorigenesis in the APC Delta468 min mouse model of colon cancer. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37(Suppl 1):E199–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01894.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nakano T, Lai CY, Goto S, Hsu LW, Kawamoto S, Ono K, et al. Immunological and regenerative aspects of hepatic mast cells in liver allograft rejection and tolerance. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Koda W, Harada K, Tsuneyama K, Kono N, Sasaki M, Matsui O, et al. Evidence of the participation of peribiliary mast cells in regulation of the peribiliary vascular plexus along the intrahepatic biliary tree. Lab Invest. 2000;80(7):1007–17. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lorentz A, Sellge G, Bischoff SC. Isolation and characterization of human intestinal mast cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1220:163–77. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1568-2_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tsuneyama K, Kono N, Yamashiro M, Kouda W, Sabit A, Sasaki M, et al. Aberrant expression of stem cell factor on biliary epithelial cells and peribiliary infiltration of c-kit-expressing mast cells in hepatolithiasis and primary sclerosing cholangitis: a possible contribution to bile duct fibrosis. J Pathol. 1999;189(4):609–14. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199912)189:4<609::AID-PATH474>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hugle T, Hogan V, White KE, van Laar JM. Mast cells are a source of transforming growth factor beta in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(3):795–9. doi: 10.1002/art.30190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Detoraki A, Staiano RI, Granata F, Giannattasio G, Prevete N, de Paulis A, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factors synthesized by human lung mast cells exert angiogenic effects. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123(5):1142–9. 9 e1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.01.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Marone G, Varricchi G, Loffredo S, Granata F. Mast cells and basophils in inflammatory and tumor angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Prevete N, Staiano RI, Granata F, Detoraki A, Necchi V, Ricci V, et al. Expression and function of Angiopoietins and their tie receptors in human basophils and mast cells. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2013;27(3):827–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Boyce JA. The biology of the mast cell. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2004;25(1):27–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boesiger J, Tsai M, Maurer M, Yamaguchi M, Brown LF, Claffey KP, et al. Mast cells can secrete vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial cell growth factor and exhibit enhanced release after immunoglobulin E-dependent upregulation of fc epsilon receptor I expression. J Exp Med. 1998;188(6):1135–45. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.6.1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Asadi S, Theoharides TC. Corticotropin-releasing hormone and extracellular mitochondria augment IgE-stimulated human mast-cell vascular endothelial growth factor release, which is inhibited by luteolin. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:85. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Choi JS, Kim JK, Yang YJ, Kim Y, Kim P, Park SG, et al. Identification of cromolyn sodium as an anti-fibrotic agent targeting both hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells. Pharmacol Res. 2015;102:176–83. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3

RESOURCES