Abstract
Background
Accurate determination of regional areas of arrhythmic triggers is of key interest to diagnose arrhythmias and optimize their treatment. Electromechanical wave imaging (EWI) is an ultrasound technique that can image the transient deformation in the myocardium following electrical activation and therefore has the potential to detect and characterize location of triggers of arrhythmias.
Objectives
The objectives of this study are to investigate the relationship between electromechanical and electrical activation of the left-ventricular (LV) endocardial surface during epicardial and endocardial pacing as well as during sinus rhythm and also to investigate the distribution of electromechanical delays.
Methods
In this study, six canines were investigated. Two external electrodes were sutured onto the epicardial surface of the left ventricle (LV). A 64-electrode basket catheter was inserted through the apex of the LV. Ultrasound channel data were acquired at 2000 frames/s during epicardial and endocardial pacing as well as during sinus rhythm. Electromechanical and electrical activation maps were synchronously obtained from the ultrasound data and the basket catheter respectively.
Results
The mean correlation coefficient between electromechanical and electrical activation was R=0.81 for epicardial anterior pacing, R=0.79 for epicardial lateral pacing, R=0.69 for endocardial pacing and R=0.56 for sinus rhythm.
Conclusions
The electromechanical activation sequence determined by EWI follows the electrical activation sequence and more specifically in the case of pacing. This finding is of key interest in the role that EWI can play in the detection of the anatomical source of arrhythmias and the planning of pacing therapies such as cardiovascular resynchronization therapy.
Keywords: Arrhythmias, Electromechanical activation, Electrical mapping, Ultrasound, Noninvasive imaging, Pacing, Canine model
Introduction
Cardiac arrhythmia is experienced by approximately 5.8 million people per year in the United Sates1. Electrocardiography (ECG) is widely used to non-invasively detect and diagnose cardiac arrhythmia. However, ECG has a low spatial resolution and cannot always accurately determine the location of the regions triggering arrhythmia. Surgical ablation of arrhythmias involves catheterization of the heart and detailed endocardial mapping to determine the source of the arrhythmia, which may be time consuming, operator dependent and limited by accessibility of the tissue. Once the source of the arrhythmia is found, radiofrequency (RF) ablation can be used to terminate the arrhythmia. However, the procedure is highly dependent on the ability of the clinician to accurately determine the location of the arrhythmogenic source. A time-effective and non-invasive method to identify the candidate regions for ablation could significantly decrease the duration of the procedure. Electrocardiographic imaging has been developed to map the electrical activity of the heart at high spatial resolution noninvasively2. However, this technique requires special hardware as well as Computed Tomography and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging scans.
Electromechanical wave imaging (EWI) is an ultrasound-based technique that can non-invasively map the minute deformation of the myocardium resulting from local electrical activation at high temporal resolution. The terminology “EWI” is preferred to “mechanical wave imaging” to avoid possible confusion with other mechanical waves propagating in the myocardium resulting from mitral or aortic valve closure3 or to blood-wall interaction and to be distinguished from time to peak strain4. Previous feasibility studies have shown that EWI is capable of transmurally mapping the electromechanical activation sequence during sinus rhythm and pacing, localizing pacing sites5, 6, characterizing arrhythmias in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and in atrial flutter patients7 and mapping the electromechanical activation during re-entrant and focal arrhythmias8. It has been reported that 20–40% of patients do not respond to CRT9. Several studies reported a strong influence of the pacing lead placement on the CRT response10. Therefore, EWI could prove to be of key interest in providing assistance in optimizing lead placement by mapping the electromechanical activity of the heart during the procedure.
In the myocardium, local electrical activation is followed by a localized minute muscle contraction after a delay in the order of tens of milliseconds11. It is hypothesized that EWI can detect the onset of contraction due to its high axial and temporal resolution. This technique is different from onset of shortening obtained from the strain curves with speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) or tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)12, 13. For STE, envelope-detected signals are used with a frame rate typically of 50–70 Hz14 although for both STE and TDI higher frame rates can be obtained at the cost of a reduced field of view. In this study, EWI is performed with interframe strain obtained from RF signals which preserve the phase information and at a frame rate of 2000 Hz with a full field of view, which allows for capturing the onset of contraction in response to electrical activation. Previous studies from our group reported a good correlation between electromechanical activation determined by EWI and electrical activation measured by epicardial or endocardial electrodes sutured on the heart5, 6. These previous initial feasibility studies, however, were limited to a low number of subjects and limited recording sites and imaging planes. A dedicated validation study with different pacing configurations and a higher number of subjects, recording sites and imaging planes has yet to be carried out. Multiple ultrasound imaging planes and higher density electrical mapping of the endocardial surface allow for better rendering of the electromechanical and electrical activation of the endocardial surface respectively. This would also allow for mapping of the distribution of electromechanical delays. The objectives of this study are to investigate the relationship between the electromechanical and the electrical activation of the endocardial surface of the canine left ventricle during epicardial and endocardial pacing and sinus rhythm as well as map the distribution of electromechanical delays.
Methods
Animal preparation
The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Columbia University and conforms to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Six canines (24.1±0.4 kg) were premedicated with diazepam (0.5–1 mg/kg) injected intravenously and subsequently anesthetized with an intravenous injection of propofol (2–5 ml/kg). The canines were mechanically ventilated with a rate- and volume-regulated ventilator on a mixture of oxygen and titrated 0.5–5% isoflurane. Lidocaine (50 μg/kg/min) was injected intravenously throughout the procedure and until the end of the experiment to minimize occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia. A left lateral thoracotomy was performed with electrocautery and one rib was removed to expose the heart. Two external bipolar electrodes were sutured onto the epicardial surface of the left ventricle (LV) in the vicinity of the anterior and lateral regions (Figure 1). A 38 mm diameter 64-electrode basket catheter (Constellation, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) with eight flexible splines and eight equally spaced (3 mm) electrodes per spline was introduced inside the LV through the apex. The basket was carefully positioned inside the LV to optimize electrode contact with the myocardium. A suture was attached beforehand to one spline of the basket catheter to serve as a landmark in order to determine the location of the splines with B-mode imaging. The thoracic cavity was filled with saline for acoustic impedance matching during ultrasound data acquisition.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of the methodology of synchronous acquisition of the electrical and electromechanical activation maps during epicardial and endocardial pacing as well as sinus rhythm, in the left ventricle of a canine. Regions in blue indicate early activation and regions in red indicate late activation.
Pacing protocol
The epicardial electrodes were connected to a data acquisition system (DAQ #1) (NI USB-6259, National Instruments, Austin, TX) which could send a 10 V amplitude, 2 ms pulse width and 500 ms cycle length pacing signal. The pacing signal was also acquired by the data acquisition system.
Endocardial pacing was also achieved by pacing from any electrode on the basket using an Arduino board equipped with a microcontroller (Arduino Mega 2560). An electrode with good contact with the endocardial wall was used for pacing. Only one electrode at a time was used for pacing. Epicardial or endocardial pacing was sustained until all echocardiographic views were acquired.
Ultrasound data acquisition
Ultrasound data were acquired either during sinus rhythm or during epicardial or endocardial pacing. Four different apical views were acquired: the standard 4-, 2- and 3-chamber views as well as the 3.5-chamber view, which is located between the 4- and the 2-chamber views. A 2.5-MHz center frequency phased array (P4-2, ATL/Philips, Andover, MA) operated by a Verasonics ultrasound system (V-1, Verasonics, Kirkland, WA) was used to acquire RF channel data at 2000 frames/s using diverging wave imaging. The ECG signal was acquired synchronously with ultrasound data using an ECG unit (77804A, HP, Palo Alto, CA) connected to another data acquisition system (DAQ #2) (NI USB-6210, National Instruments, Austin, TX) and triggered by the Verasonics. A standard delay-and-sum method was used to reconstruct the entire image for each single diverging beam transmitted. Conventional B-mode images were also acquired at 30 frames/s to assist myocardial segmentation. Axial displacements in the myocardium were estimated between consecutive RF frames using normalized 1-D cross-correlation15 with a window length of 6.2 mm and 90% overlap. Interframe axial strains were estimated from the interframe axial displacements using a least square estimator implemented with a Savitzky-Golay filter with a 5-mm kernel. Positive strains in the longitudinal direction indicate longitudinal lengthening whereas negative strains indicate longitudinal shortening. During ventricular contraction, there is longitudinal shortening. Therefore, the electromechanical activation time-point at a given location was defined when the temporal curve of interframe axial strain changed sign, i.e. as the first zero-crossing5, after the onset of electrical activation defined below. Isochrones of the electromechanical activation were obtained for each echocardiographic view. Electromechanical activation times were obtained on the endocardial surface in the vicinity of each electrode of the basket catheter. Conventional B-mode images were used to assist for the location of the electrodes which could be seen due to their high echogenicity (Figure 2). For each ultrasound view, we tried to angle the ultrasound transducer so that the electrodes on the splines were visible on the ultrasound image. Manual selection was performed on the endocardial surface of the LV at mid-distance between each pair of electrodes to determine the electromechanical activation times to be correlated with the electrical activation times. Regions for which no clear zero-crossing was observed or for which the catheter was pushing on the myocardium during contraction and therefore giving non physiological deformation were excluded.
Figure 2.

B-mode image of the apical four-chamber view with the basket inserted in the left ventricle (LV). The electrodes of the basket can be distinguished as bright spots due to their high echogenicity and are indicated by blue arrows at the septal and lateral walls. RV indicates right ventricle.
Electrical data acquisition
The basket catheter was connected to four custom-built acquisition boards (two splines per acquisition board). Bipolar electrograms were obtained from adjacent electrodes on the same spline. Bipolar signals were preferred over unipolar ones since they reduce far field effects16. Fifty six bipolar electrograms (seven bipolar electrograms per spline) were multiplexed and output to DAQ #1, which was controlled using Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, MA). Each bipolar electrogram was sampled at 1 kHz. The trigger of the Verasonics ultrasound system was also connected to DAQ #1 in order to acquire the electrograms synchronously with the ultrasound data. The electrograms were high-pass-filtered with a 0.5 Hz cutoff frequency and then low-pass filtered with a 100 Hz cutoff frequency. The maximum peak of each of the 56 electrograms regardless of polarity was determined using parabolic interpolation and defined the electrical activation times which were associated with the depolarization of the myocardium. Some electrograms were excluded due to poor electrode contact with the endocardium or to damaged electrodes and were thus discarded. Peaks outside the range of ±0.5 mV were discarded.
Statistical analysis
Regions where the electromechanical or the electrical activation time could not be determined were linearly interpolated. A linear regression was performed between the electromechanical and the electrical activation times; the correlation coefficient, the associated p-value, the slope and the intercept were obtained.
Ellipsoidal rendering of activation time
Electromechanical and electrical activation times on the endocardial surface of the left ventricle were obtained for four different echocardiographic views. The electromechanical and electrical activation times were then linearly interpolated onto an ellipsoid of the same geometry as the basket catheter to represent the isochrones on the endocardial surface. It was assumed that the spacing between neighboring splines remained identical and constant after insertion in the left ventricle. The propagation of the electromechanical and of the electrical activation was illustrated by depicting activated regions as a function of time on the ellipsoid.
Results
Electromechanical and electrical activation maps were obtained in the LV of six canines during epicardial and endocardial pacing as well as during sinus rhythm.
Epicardial pacing
Electrical and electromechanical activation times as well as the corresponding linear regression during epicardial pacing around the anterior region of the LV are shown in Figure 3.A for one canine. Early activation regions are displayed in blue whereas late activated regions are displayed in red. Both the electrical and electromechanical activation maps show that the first activated regions are located in the anterior region and the last regions activated are located approximately in the posterior region. Electrical and electromechanical activation times as well as the corresponding linear regression were also obtained during epicardial pacing around the lateral region of the LV and are shown in Figure 3.B for one canine. The electrical and the electromechanical activation maps show that the first activated regions are located approximately in the lateral region whereas the septal region is the activated last. Good agreement was observed between the electrical and electromechanical activation times for both anterior and lateral epicardial pacing. The correlation coefficient, slope and intercept for all six canines are given in Table 1. The mean correlation coefficient across all canines during epicardial lateral pacing was 0.79, the mean slope was 2.2 and the mean intercept was 29 ms. During epicardial anterior pacing, the mean correlation coefficient was 0.81, the mean slope was 1.8 and the mean intercept was 32 ms.
Figure 3.
Electrical and electromechanical activation times in a canine left ventricle during epicardial anterior (A), epicardial lateral (B) and endocardial (C) pacing as well as during sinus rhythm (D). The electrical and the electromechanical (EWI) maps show similar pattern in each case. A linear regression between electromechanical and electrical activation times is performed. The lightening cartoon indicates the paced region. R = correlation coefficient, Sept = septum, Post = posterior and Lat = lateral.
Table 1.
Linear regression results between the electromechanical and the electrical activation times in six canines during epicardial and endocardial pacing as well as during sinus rhythm.
| Dog #1 | Dog #2 | Dog #3 | Dog #4 | Dog #5 | Dog #6 | Mean value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epicardial lateral pacing | R=0.87*** s=3.6 i=19ms |
R=0.80*** s=2.5 i=12ms |
R=0.91*** s=1.6 i=24ms |
R=0.94*** s=1.9 i=47ms |
R=0.47*** s=1.9 i=39ms |
R=0.89*** s=1.5 i=34ms |
R=0.79 s=2.2 i=29ms |
| Epicardial anterior pacing | N.A. | R=0.76*** s=1.5 i=54ms |
R=0.63*** s=1.7 i=31ms |
R=0.89*** s=2.3 i=16ms |
R=0.88*** s=2.3 i=13 ms |
R=0.80*** s=1.4 i=44 ms |
R=0.81 s=1.8 i=32ms |
| Endocardial pacing | R=0.84*** s=1.9 i=47ms |
R=0.74*** s=1.8 i=22ms |
R=0.63*** s=1.6 i=33ms |
N.A. | R=0.61*** s=0.9 i=52ms |
R=0.61*** s=0.9 i=50ms |
R=0.69 s=1.4 i=41 ms |
| Sinus rhythm | R=0.61*** s=2.7 i=34ms |
R=0.43*** s=1.2 i=23ms |
R=0.76*** s=2.4 i=60ms |
R=0.78*** s=2.1 i=40ms |
R=0.39** s=2.7 i=33ms |
R=0.41** s=1.9 i=46ms |
R=0.56 s=2.2 i=39ms |
The table indicates for each case the correlation coefficient (R), the slope (s) and the intercept (i) of the regression. In two cases, the data were not available (N.A.).
p<0.01,
p<0.001
Endocardial pacing
Electrical and electromechanical activation times as well as the corresponding linear regressions were also obtained during endocardial pacing from one electrode on the basket catheter and are shown in Figure 3.C for one canine. The electrical activation maps indicate that the activation starts in the paced region, subsequently propagating towards the opposite direction. The location of the paced region differed across canines due to different choices of electrodes to pace the ventricle. The electrical and electromechanical activation maps show a similar activation pattern. The mean correlation coefficient across all canines was 0.69, the mean slope was 1.4 and the mean intercept was 41 ms.
Sinus rhythm
Electrical and electromechanical activation times as well as the corresponding linear regressions during baseline acquisition (sinus rhythm) are shown in Figure 3.D for one canine. The first regions activated are located approximately in the septal region whereas the last regions activated are located approximately in the posterior-lateral region. Also, the apical region is activated before the basal region. The electrical and electromechanical activation maps show a similar activation pattern. The mean correlation coefficient across all canines was 0.56, the mean slope was 2.2 and the mean intercept was 39 ms.
Electromechanical delay
The distribution of electromechanical delays in the LV was obtained for epicardial and endocardial pacing as well as for baseline acquisitions. Figure 4 shows the distribution of electromechanical delays for epicardial anterior, epicardial lateral and endocardial pacing as well as during sinus rhythm for the same canine described in Figure 3. During epicardial and endocardial pacing the electromechanical delay is shorter near the pacing origin while it increases with distance. During sinus rhythm, the apical region presents shorter electromechanical delays whereas the basal region presents longer electromechanical delays. The regions of shortest and longest electromechanical delays for all six canines are indicated in Table 2.
Figure 4.

Electromechanical delays (EMD) in a canine during epicardial anterior (A), epicardial lateral (B) and endocardial (C) pacing as well as during sinus rhythm (D). The electromechanical delays are shorter near the first activated regions and longer for the latest activated ones. The lightening cartoon indicates the paced region.
Table 2.
Regions of shortest and longest electromechanical delays in six canines during epicardial and endocardial pacing as well as during sinus rhythm. In two cases, the data were not available (N.A.).
| Dog #1 | Dog #2 | Dog #3 | Dog #4 | Dog #5 | Dog #6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epicardial lateral pacing | Shortest Longest |
A-L P-S |
P-L P-S |
A-L P-S |
P-L A-S |
L S |
L P-S |
| Epicardial anterior pacing | Shortest Longest |
N.A. | A-L P-S |
A P-L |
A-L P-S |
A P-L |
A P-S |
| Endocardial pacing | Shortest Longest |
P-S A |
L A |
P-L A-L |
N.A. | A-L S |
P S |
| Sinus rhythm | Shortest Longest |
A-S P-L |
S A |
P-S A-L |
S P |
P-S L |
S L |
A: Anterior, P: Posterior, S: Septal, L: Lateral
Discussion
Non-invasive and efficient mapping of the electrical activity of the heart can improve the identification of the regions responsible for arrhythmia which is of paramount interest to optimize their associated therapies. Electromechanical wave imaging (EWI) is a high temporal resolution, ultrasound-based technique that can map the electromechanical activity of the heart. The aims of this study were to show how the electromechanical activation maps obtained with EWI can be associated with the electrical activation and to show that EWI can map the electromechanical activation during sinus rhythm, epicardial and endocardial pacing.
During epicardial and endocardial pacing, the electromechanical and electrical activations in the LV followed a similar pattern. It was also shown that the paced region, e.g. anterior, had early activation times, whereas regions further away from the pacing site, e.g. posterior, were electrically and electromechanically activated later which is consistent with previous studies17–19. The correlation coefficient across all canines for epicardial pacing ranged from 0.47 to 0.94 and had a mean value of 0.79, the mean slope was 2.0 and the mean intercept was 30 ms. EWI is thus shown to be a good surrogate for electrical mapping, confirming reports of other studies17, 19–21 although using different definitions of electrical and mechanical activation. For endocardial pacing, the correlation coefficient ranged from 0.61 to 0.84 and had a mean value of 0.69, a mean slope of 1.4 and a mean intercept of 41 ms. The electrograms during endocardial pacing were not as sharp as those from epicardial pacing. Therefore, the activation time derived from the electrograms may be less accurate, which can partly explain the lower correlation coefficient obtained during endocardial pacing compared to the one obtained during epicardial pacing. The electromechanical delay distribution during epicardial and endocardial pacing was not homogeneous. As mentioned in a previous study, the distribution of the electromechanical delays depends on the sequence of activation. The early activated regions have a shorter electromechanical delay than the late activated regions17, 18, 22.
For baseline acquisitions, the electromechanical and electrical activation maps also showed a similar pattern. During sinus rhythm, the activation sequence was different from that during pacing. The first regions activated were posterior-septal, septal and anterior-septal and the last regions activated were anterior-lateral, lateral and posterior-lateral. Early activation in the septal region of the LV has been previously reported18, 23. In addition, the apical region was activated before the basal region. This apex to base propagation is also consistent with previous studies18, 23, 24. The correlation coefficient across all canines ranged from 0.39 to 0.78 and had a mean value of 0.56. This indicates that the electromechanical activity depicted by EWI is associated with the electrical activity obtained by endocardial electrical mapping. The mean slope of the linear regression of electromechanical activation times versus electrical activation times was 2.2, which is superior to 1 and indicates electrical activation was followed by electromechanical activation. More specifically, depolarization was followed by the contraction with an increasing delay. The mean intercept was 39 ms, indicating that the electromechanical delay in the first activated region in the ventricle was 39 ms on average. The map of the electromechanical delays was obtained by representing the difference between electromechanical and electrical activation times. The distribution of electromechanical delays in the LV during sinus rhythm was different from the paced distribution. The apical region had shorter electromechanical delays compared to the basal region. This observation is consistent with a previous study from Gurev et al. in a simulation study using an electromechanical model18.
Although similar electromechanical and electrical activation maps were found, this study presents several limitations that may affect the quantitative aspects reported herein. The orientation of the splines of the basket inside the LV was determined by the specular reflection from a suture attached to one of the splines using conventional B-mode imaging. Although the reflection from the suture was not always easily identifiable, the activation maps obtained from the basket by pacing from epicardial electrodes sutured at a known location were in good agreement with the expected earliest activated spline. In addition, although significant efforts to align the splines of the basket with the echocardiographic views were made, the alignment was imperfect. Therefore, the anatomical locations corresponding to electrical and electromechanical activation times used for the correlation analysis may not optimally match. The activation propagates throughout the entire volume of the myocardium. However, the electromechanical maps were obtained from 2-D echocardiographic views and the electrical measurements are obtained from 56 bipolar endocardial electrograms.
As shown in Table 1, the linear regression analysis could not be performed in two cases: for one canine, during epicardial pacing, ultrasound data were not saved properly and could not be processed and for another canine, endocardial pacing was not performed.
For this basket catheter, the electrode spacing was 3 mm. Considering a conduction velocity of 0.4–0.7 m/s at the endocardium25, the time delay between two neighboring electrodes would be 4.3–7.5 ms for a propagation along the axis defined by the two electrodes. In that case, two temporally separated depolarization peaks can be detected on the bipolar electrograms and this can yield an uncertainty in the order of the time delay between those two peaks for the determination of the electrical activation times.
The electromechanical activation times were defined at the zero-crossings on the strain curves. The zero-crossings indicate the time when the myocardium locally transitions from relaxation to contraction. However, some regions may start to contract later than other regions due to distinct loading conditions or prestretched regions22. Therefore, although a contraction force may start to develop locally after electrical excitation, the shortening of muscles may take additional time in prestretched myocardial regions. This may partly be explained by the distribution of the electromechanical delays and result in a slope greater than one for the regression analysis between electromechanical and electrical activation times.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study shows that the electromechanical activation sequence determined by EWI follows the electrical activation sequence during epicardial and endocardial pacing as well as during sinus rhythm. A higher correlation between electrical and electromechanical activation times was obtained during pacing than during sinus rhythm. These findings indicate that EWI has great potential to non-invasively characterize and identify regions responsible for arrhythmias as well as to provide assistance during cardiac ablation and pacing therapy. Futures studies will include 3-D mapping of the electromechanical activation sequence.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health R01-EB006042 and R01-HL114358.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: None
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Tang DH, Gilligan AM, Romero K. Economic burden and disparities in healthcare resource use among adult patients with cardiac arrhythmia. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12:59–71. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0070-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang Y, Cuculich PS, Zhang J, Desouza KA, Vijayakumar R, Chen J, Faddis MN, Lindsay BD, Smith TW, Rudy Y. Noninvasive electroanatomic mapping of human ventricular arrhythmias with electrocardiographic imaging. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:98ra84. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Remme EW, Lyseggen E, Helle-Valle T, Opdahl A, Pettersen E, Vartdal T, Ragnarsson A, Ljosland M, Ihlen H, Edvardsen T, Smiseth OA. Mechanisms of preejection and postejection velocity spikes in left ventricular myocardium: interaction between wall deformation and valve events. Circulation. 2008;118:373–380. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.748491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kanzaki H, Bazaz R, Schwartzman D, Dohi K, Sade LE, Gorcsan J., 3rd A mechanism for immediate reduction in mitral regurgitation after cardiac resynchronization therapy: insights from mechanical activation strain mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1619–1625. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Provost J, Lee WN, Fujikura K, Konofagou EE. Imaging the electromechanical activity of the heart in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:8565–8570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011688108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Provost J, Nguyen VT, Legrand D, Okrasinski S, Costet A, Gambhir A, Garan H, Konofagou EE. Electromechanical wave imaging for arrhythmias. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:L1–11. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/22/F01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Provost J, Gambhir A, Vest J, Garan H, Konofagou EE. A clinical feasibility study of atrial and ventricular electromechanical wave imaging. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:856–862. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.02.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Provost J, Costet A, Wan E, Gambhir A, Whang W, Garan H, Konofagou EE. Assessing the atrial electromechanical coupling during atrial focal tachycardia, flutter, and fibrillation using electromechanical wave imaging in humans. Comput Biol Med. 2015;65:161–167. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ypenburg C, Westenberg JJ, Bleeker GB, VANdV N, Marsan NA, Henneman MM, van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ, Abraham TP, Barold SS, Bax JJ. Noninvasive imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy--part 1: selection of patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008;31:1475–1499. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01212.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ypenburg C, van Bommel RJ, Delgado V, Mollema SA, Bleeker GB, Boersma E, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. Optimal left ventricular lead position predicts reverse remodeling and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1402–1409. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cordeiro JM, Greene L, Heilmann C, Antzelevitch D, Antzelevitch C. Transmural heterogeneity of calcium activity and mechanical function in the canine left ventricle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286:H1471–1479. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00748.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sengupta PP, Krishnamoorthy VK, Korinek J, Narula J, Vannan MA, Lester SJ, Tajik JA, Seward JB, Khandheria BK, Belohlavek M. Left ventricular form and function revisited: applied translational science to cardiovascular ultrasound imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:539–551. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Voigt JU, Schneider TM, Korder S, Szulik M, Gurel E, Daniel WG, Rademakers F, Flachskampf FA. Apical transverse motion as surrogate parameter to determine regional left ventricular function inhomogeneities: a new, integrative approach to left ventricular asynchrony assessment. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:959–968. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Teske AJ, De Boeck BWL, Melman PG, Sieswerda GT, Doevendans PA, Cramer MJM. Echocardiographic quantification of myocardial function using tissue deformation imaging, a guide to image acquisition and analysis using tissue Doppler and speckle tracking. Cardiovascular Ultrasound. 2007;5:27–27. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-5-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Luo J, Konofagou E. A fast normalized cross-correlation calculation method for motion estimation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2010;57:1347–1357. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gepstein L, Evans SJ. Electroanatomical mapping of the heart: basic concepts and implications for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21:1268–1278. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00187.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Badke FR, Boinay P, Covell JW. Effects of ventricular pacing on regional left ventricular performance in the dog. Am J Physiol. 1980;238:H858–867. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1980.238.6.H858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gurev V, Constantino J, Rice JJ, Trayanova NA. Distribution of electromechanical delay in the heart: insights from a three-dimensional electromechanical model. Biophys J. 2010;99:745–754. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.05.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wyman BT, Hunter WC, Prinzen FW, McVeigh ER. Mapping propagation of mechanical activation in the paced heart with MRI tagging. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:H881–891. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1999.276.3.H881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Faris OP, Evans FJ, Ennis DB, Helm PA, Taylor JL, Chesnick AS, Guttman MA, Ozturk C, McVeigh ER. Novel technique for cardiac electromechanical mapping with magnetic resonance imaging tagging and an epicardial electrode sock. Ann Biomed Eng. 2003;31:430–440. doi: 10.1114/1.1560618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kroon W, Lumens J, Potse M, Suerder D, Klersy C, Regoli F, Murzilli R, Moccetti T, Delhaas T, Krause R, Prinzen FW, Auricchio A. In vivo electromechanical assessment of heart failure patients with prolonged QRS duration. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1259–1267. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Prinzen FW, Augustijn CH, Allessie MA, Arts T, Delhaas T, Reneman RS. The time sequence of electrical and mechanical activation during spontaneous beating and ectopic stimulation. Eur Heart J. 1992;13:535–543. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Durrer D, van Dam RT, Freud GE, Janse MJ, Meijler FL, Arzbaecher RC. Total excitation of the isolated human heart. Circulation. 1970;41:899–912. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.41.6.899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sengupta PP, Khandheria BK, Korinek J, Wang J, Jahangir A, Seward JB, Belohlavek M. Apex-to-base dispersion in regional timing of left ventricular shortening and lengthening. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Akar FG, Spragg DD, Tunin RS, Kass DA, Tomaselli GF. Mechanisms underlying conduction slowing and arrhythmogenesis in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circ Res. 2004;95:717–725. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000144125.61927.1c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


