Skip to main content
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India logoLink to Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India
. 2015 Dec 17;66(Suppl 2):666–668. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0814-6

Endometrial Ossification: An Unusual Cause of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB)

Pabashi Poddar 1,, Komal Chavan 1, Rajendra M Saraogi 1, Pramila Yadav 1
PMCID: PMC5080243  PMID: 27803539

Introduction

Endometrial ossification is a rare occurrence and has also been described as osseous metaplasia of the endometrium, ectopic intrauterine bone, and heterotopic intrauterine bone formation [1]. Most patients present between 20 and 40 years, and the common underlying factors are a history of menstrual irregularities, recurrent abortions, and endometritis. Endometrial ossification may present as secondary infertility, prolonged unexplained vaginal bleeding, or intrauterine pain.

Case Study

A 32-year-old para 2 living 2 (P2L2) came to our out-patient department (OPD) with complaints of polymenorrhagia since last child birth (13 years back). There were no complaints of dysmenorrhea, no relieving or aggravating factors, history of pill use, history of Koch’s, or use of intra-uterine contraceptive device (IUCD). On examination, vital signs were stable with no signs of pallor or any significant abnormality. On per speculum, cervix and vagina were healthy. On per-vaginum examination, uterus was bulky and fornices appeared free.

A routine pelvic ultrasonogram was done wherein uterus was 8.2 × 4.0 × 4.3 cm with multiple linear to curvilinear dense after shadows measuring 1.5 to 2 cm in submucosal region of the lower uterine segment which could represent calcified fibroids. Few subcentimeter calcific foci were noted in fundal region. Endometrial thickness (ET) was 5 mm. Rest of the study was within normal limits.

On repeat examination, during per speculum examination, after holding the anterior lip of cervix with vulsellum, a uterine sound was introduced. A hard calcified density could be felt in the posterior part of lower uterine segment. On per-vaginum examination, the calcified part could be felt through the os in the cervix area on the posterior lip toward the right side.

A repeat scan was done by senior sonologist which also showed irregular calcifications in posterior subendometrial region in lower uterine segment for a length of 4 cm with similar calcifications in fundal region. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pelvis was advised which to our surprise appeared normal.

Myomectomy was planned but keeping in mind a normal MRI scan, decision to do a diagnostic hysteroscopy first to reach the final conclusion was taken.

During hysteroscopy, after dilating the cervix, hard calcified linear densities/bands were seen in the posterior part of cervix and in the left lateral wall of uterus near and obscuring the cornu. Rest of the endometrium appeared normal.

During endometrial curetting, multiple hard bony chips with small 2-cm linear bone remnants were also extracted. The material was sent for histopathology (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Bony chips removed during curettage

On repeated retrospective questioning also, the patient denied any history of dilatation and curettage (D&C) or history of amenorrhea followed by bleeding per vaginum (PV) or history of missed periods or using any emergency contraceptive. There was no history of lactational amenorrhea or history of any abortion or twin pregnancy or intra-uterine fetal death (IUFD).

HPR Report

Endometrial glands in proliferative phase with stroma showing multiple foci of ossification (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Histo-pathological report (HPR) slide showing endometrial ossification

Discussion

Findings of bones/bone remnants inside the uterine cavity is a rare phenomenon with very few cases reported in the literature, with most of the cases reported due to infertility with a relevant history of medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) or D&C done for missed abortion.

Endometrial ossification is an uncommon finding with several suggestions been made regarding the pathogenesis of this lesion [2] like osseous metaplasia from multipotential stromal cells, usually fibroblasts, which become osteo-blasts; continuous and strong endometrial estrogenic stimulation; retention of fetal bones that secondarily promote osteogenesis in the surrounding endometrium; implantation of embryonic parts without preexisting bone after abortions at an early stage; dystrophic calcification of retained and necrotic tissues, usually after an abortion; chronic endometrial inflammation such as endometritis or pyometra; and metabolic disorders such as hypercalcemia, hypervitaminosis D or hyperphosphatemia [3]. The actual contribution of these pathogenic mechanisms is unknown.

Retained fetal bones in the uterine cavity may be subsequent to mid-trimester pregnancy termination, spontaneous intrauterine death, and missed abortion. The reported incidence of retained fetal bone is 0.15 % among diagnostic hysteroscopies. They may prevent pregnancy by an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD)—like effect. There are only a few case reports of intrauterine-retained fetal bones resulting in secondary infertility in the literature.

Prolonged retention of fetal bones may present as pelvic inflammatory disease, chronic pelvic pain, infertility, menorrhagia, irregular bleeding, offensive vaginal discharge, or passage of bony fragments per vaginum.

The differential diagnosis of such unusual findings on ultrasound examination includes intrauterine contraceptive devices, foreign bodies, calcified submucous fibroids, endometrial tuberculosis, Asherman’s syndrome, and rarities such as heterotopic bone and uterine malignant mixed mullerian tumor [4]. Hysteroscopy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of endometrial pathology [2]. However, transvaginal ultrasound is an excellent alternative, with a high sensitivity and specificity for endometrial pathology, particularly when combined with saline infusion.

Optimum treatment for such lesions is hysteroscopic removal of osseous material. Most of the cases reported had resolution of symptoms and several conceived spontaneously [5]. On follow-up the patient was started on combination oral estrogen–progesterone cyclical for 3 months and has regular cycles since then with symptoms being relieved.

Conclusion

This case report highlights endometrial ossification as a very rare and peculiar case. It is important to take a detailed past history and obstetric history and keep in mind this diagnosis while evaluating a pelvic sonogram [6, 7].

Dr. Pabashi Poddar MS, DNB OBGY

She did MS OBGY from Grant Medical College, Mumbai in 2014. She was working as Speciality Medical Officer, DR RN Cooper Hospital, Juhu, Mumbai from 2014–2015. Currently she is doing her fellowship in gynec-oncology from GCRI, Gujarat.graphic file with name 13224_2015_814_Figa_HTML.jpg

Conflict of interest

We the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

We the authors of Dr R N Cooper Hospital Juhu, Mumbai, would like to submit a rare interesting case report of endometrial ossification: an unusual cause of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). We have obtained necessary permission from the hospital to publish it.

Footnotes

Pabashi Poddar: Speciality Medical Officer; Dr. Komal Chavan, Asst Honorary, HBTMC and DR RN Cooper Hospital, Mumbai; Dr. Rajendra M. Saraogi, Honorary, HBTMC and DR RN Cooper Hospital, Mumbai; Dr. Pramila Yadav, Asst Professor, HBTMC and DR RN Cooper Hospital, Mumbai.

References

  • 1.Shimizu M, Nakayama M. Endometrial ossification in a postmenopausal woman. J Clin Pathol. 1997;50:171–172. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.2.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Basu M, Mammen C, Owen E. Bony fragments in the uterus: an association with secondary infertility. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:402–406. doi: 10.1002/uog.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rosa-e-Silva JC, Barcelos ID, Navarro PA, et al. Osseous metaplasia of the endometrium associated with infertility: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2009;3:7427. doi: 10.4076/1752-1947-3-7427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Makkar M, Pandey P, Gupta C, et al. Enodmetrial ossification: an unusual cause of infertility. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011;5(3):613–615. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chowhan AK, Rukmangadha N, Patnayak R, et al. Retained intrauterine foetal bones: a rare cause of secondary infertility leading to diagnostic dilemma. J Clin Sci Res. 2012;1(2):103–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Venkatraman J, Kotasthane D, Koteeswaran G. A rare case of endometrial ossification. Internet J Pathol. 2013;14(1):14489. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bakhshi PS, Allahabadia GN, Kaur K, et al. Hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine fetal bones. Gynecol Surg. 2004;1:159–166. doi: 10.1007/s10397-004-0033-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES