Abstract
Evolutionary frozen, genetically sterile and globally iconic fruit “Banana” remained untouched by the green revolution and, as of today, researchers face intrinsic impediments for its varietal improvement. Recently, this wonder crop entered the genomics era with decoding of structural genome of double haploid Pahang (AA genome constitution) genotype of Musa acuminata. Its complex genome decoded by hybrid sequencing strategies revealed panoply of genes and transcription factors involved in the process of sucrose conversion that imparts sweetness to its fruit. Historically, banana has faced the wrath of pandemic bacterial, fungal, and viral diseases and multitude of abiotic stresses that has ruined the livelihood of small/marginal farmers’ and destroyed commercial plantations. Decoding structural genome of this climacteric fruit has given impetus to a deeper understanding of the repertoire of genes involved in disease resistance, understanding the mechanism of dwarfing to develop an ideal plant type, unraveling the process of parthenocarpy, and fruit ripening for better fruit quality. Further, injunction of comparative genomics will usher in integration of information from its decoded genome and other monocots into field applications in banana related but not limited to yield enhancement, food security, livelihood assurance, and energy sustainability. In this mini review, we discuss pre- and post-genomic discoveries and highlight accomplishments in structural genomics, genetic engineering and forward genetic accomplishments with an aim to target genes and transcription factors for translational research in banana.
Keywords: Banana/plantain, evolution, structural genome, disease resistance, parthenocarpy, dwarfism, biotic and abiotic stress, comparative genomics
Introduction
Banana is a unique and iconic fruit among global consumers. The fruit has numerous health benefits such as subsiding appetite, sugar craving, fighting obesity, improving muscle endurance, and reducing bad cholesterol in humans. Along with its related clade plantain, it is grown as a cash crop1 around the world with more than 85% for local consumption (Sharrock and Frison, 1998). Predominantly, it is cultivated in tropical and sub-tropical countries (van Asten et al., 2011) and is an important source of livelihood of marginal farmers of Asia and South-east Asia (Figure 1a,b,c) (Sreedharan et al., 2013). It ranks second to mango as the most consumed fruit in the world and is a source of food security in many developing countries (Martin et al., 2013). This fruit has a unique yellow peel and sweet flesh which makes it popular as a part of healthy diet in industrialized countries as well. The canoe shaped fruit is usually fried, roasted, or boiled when green, while special fruit types of the East African highland plantain cultivar are preferentially brewed. It ranks next to rice, wheat and maize (Perrier et al., 2011) in terms of its importance as source of staple starch with global annual production of 106 MT in which Asia contributes 60 MT (WBF: Statistics and data, 2012).
Banana Biology, Origin and Evolution
Taxonomically, bananas and plantains are monocotyledonous plants in the genus Musa (Family: Musaceae; Order: Zingiberales) that comprises “Eumusa” with 22 chromosomes and “Australimusa” with 20 chromosome sets (Perrier et al., 2009, 2011). Though, botanically it is a monocotyledonous perennial herb (Uma et al., 2008), the presence of the unique tall order pseudo-stem apparently attributes it the tree phenotype (approximately 2.0–3.5 m). However, absence of typical traits of tree stems such as lignification and secondary thickening of the pseudo-stem differentiates them from trees (Wu et al., 2016).
Banana is considered to have originated in Asiatic region (Simmonds, 1962) with South-east Asia covering India to Polynesia as the primary center of origin; while the tropical rainforest of Malaysia–Indonesia is considered as the center of diversity with occurrence of diverse endemic wild banana species (Figure 1d). As per the International Classification System (ICS) Musa has five major sections, viz., Eumusa, Rhodochlamys, Callimusa, Australimusa and Incertae sedis. Of these sections, Eumusa contributes to the wide diversity for wild and cultivated types. There are 11 wild species reported across the globe of which six species are prevalent in India. M. acuminata and M. balbisiana are the major progenitors of present day bananas and have a wider distribution throughout the banana growing states including Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
Plantains and bananas (Musa spp. section Eumusa) originated from intra and inter-specific hybridization between two wild species namely M. acuminata Colla (A genome) and M. balbisiana Colla (B genome). Polyploidy and hybridization have given rise to a number of diploid, triploid, and tetraploid clones with different combinations of A and B genomes like AA, AB, AAA, AAB, ABB, AABB, AAAB, ABBB (Saraswathi, 2011; Vanhove et al., 2012; Davey, 2013). Dessert and highland bananas are classified mainly as AAA, plantains are AAB, and cooking bananas are ABB. The first and most crucial step in evolution of edible bananas was the development and selection for parthenocarpy and seed sterility in M. acuminata, giving rise to the edible diploid (AA) cultivars. It is believed that chromosome restitution at meiosis in M. acuminata gave rise to edible triploid AAA (acuminata) bananas. Though not clear, using variation in anthocyanin pigments as a marker, it is assumed that three different subspecies such as malaccensis, banksii, and zebrina (Horry and Jay, 1990) were involved in the evolution of triploid edible bananas.
Banana Diversity and Use
Till 1970, the delicious ‘Gros’ Michel or ‘Big Mike’ bananas were the globally accepted varieties for consumption. However, after out-break of the “Panama disease,” they were replaced by the yellow Cavendish variety (Heslop-Harrison and Schwarzacher, 2007) which were resistant to Panama wilt. Currently, more than 90% of the bananas sold in the market are of Cavendish type. ‘Robusta’ (AAA), a Cavendish cultivar of banana, ripens without changing to yellow (green ripe) and has good shelf-life with mild taste and mushy texture of typical Cavendish. ‘Nendran’ type banana (AAB) is preferred for cooking and making chips while ‘Peyan’ (ABB) is a dessert banana. ‘Poovan’ (AAB) and ‘Njalipoovan’ are sweet dessert banana with small fingers, thin skin and delicate flavor but exhibit poor keeping quality thus reducing the marketable value. Currently, a handful of other prized types are available such as ‘red’ (AAA) - a delicious banana that has a sweet taste and creamy texture. The ‘Burro’ varieties grown in Mexico have a sweet-and-sour taste but are stubbier and fatter than the Cavendish type. ‘Manzano’ variety is native to Central and South America and possesses a firmer texture than Cavendish with complex scent and taste, marked by a strong tart-apple aroma that gives sweetness after chewing. Another variety named as ‘Baby’ for their miniature size (Malaysian origin) and is sweet in taste after complete ripening. A different clade called ‘Plantain’ is usually cooked for consumption and serves as an economical but delicious substitute for potatoes/rice in Latin American cuisines.
Banana Genomics
Genetically, banana is a triploid crop and comprises of both A (M. acuminata) and B (M. balbisiana) genomes. The triploid genetic constitution of banana posed a huge challenge to the sequencing and assembly of its genome. Therefore, a double haploid (PH-Pahang) M. acuminata was generated and sequencing was accomplished in 2012 by a team of researchers (D’Hont et al., 2012) under the framework of Global Musa Genomics Consortium. The genome size of Musa ranges from 554 megabase (Mb) in M. balbisiana to 523 Mb in M. acuminata. The genome is two/three times larger than the genomes of cultivated rice (Oryza sativa, 250 Mb) or Arabidopsis (150 Mb) but still is much smaller than the Triticeae cereals such as wheat (17,000 Mb), barley (5,500 Mb) and rye (9000 Mb; D’Hont et al., 2012). Nonetheless, the 523 Mb genome of banana was precisely sequenced with a combination of Sanger, 454 and Illumina technologies and 90% assembled into 7000 scaffolds with contiguity on par with other plant genomes (1.3 Mb scaffold N50). Further, 70% of the assembly anchored to 11 Pahang chromosomes with 250 scaffolds covering 92% of the annotated genes. Sequencing information further revealed that banana genome contained approximately 36,000 genes which were mostly located in the distal-end of the chromosomes. It was also observed that like most plant genomes (Singh et al., 2012; Varshney et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012), the Musa genome consists of repetitive DNA (about 50%) comprising of transposable elements.
Interestingly, the number of transcription factors (TFs) identified in Musa (3,155) is highest among all sequenced plants. Of these, 759 TFs were specific to banana and belonged to the MYB and AP2/ERF transcription factor families that plays a role in fruit architecture and ripening (D’Hont et al., 2012). Expression profiling study in response to ethylene treatment identified a cassette of transcription factors (597) speculated to contribute to the unique climacteric character of ripening in banana. Genes encoding cell-wall modifying enzymes and β-amylase were found to be up-regulated in contrast to three starch synthase genes which were down regulated during ripening. In addition, two vacuolar invertase genes involved in sucrose conversion, work in reverse tandem to maintain soluble sugar homeostasis that imparts sweetness to ripening bananas.
Disease Epidemics and Resistance in Cultivated Banana
Cultivated bananas are propagated through vegetative suckers and this clonal method of propagation makes banana particularly vulnerable to diseases. Historically, Panama disease (Figure 1e) caused by the fungus Fusarium oxysporum sp. cubense has inflicted major devastation to the banana plantations (Moore et al., 1995). A virulent form of this pathogen, ‘Tropical Race 4,’ has caused substantial losses in Asia and other regions of the world to both subsistence farmers and commercial growers (Hwang and Ko, 2004). Exploring for genetic resistance in banana germplasm has led to the identification of a number of varieties (Ortiz, 1995) that could be potentially utilized as resistance gene donors for breeding or gene transfer programs. However, the genetically sterile nature of banana is an impediment to resistance breeding. Therefore, utilizing forward genetics tool of induced mutagenesis, a resistant cultivar of Rasthali (Silk, AAB) has been developed to combat fusarium wilt (Saraswathi et al., 2016). The putative resistant plants showed promising results with completely clean corm (disease score 1) that had no vascular discoloration (zero disease manifestation). Further, the double haploid Pahang, used for genome sequencing, was found to be highly resistant to F. oxysporum race-4. Functional genomics studies on Pahang would unravel the genes underlying this inherent resistance.
Another fungal disease of banana which has acquired importance is black Sigatoka leaf spot disease (Figure 1f), caused by Mycosphaerella fijiensis which results in more than 50% crop losses (Ferreira and Silva, 2004). A triple gene construct from heterologous sources viz.(i) endochitinase gene ThEn-42 from Trichoderma harzianum, (ii) grape stilbene synthase (StSy), and (iii) superoxide dismutase Cu, Zn-SOD from tomato were used to transform Grand Nain banana (Vishnevetsky et al., 2011). Repeated field trials of this transgenic exhibited tolerance not only to Sigatoka but also to ‘Gray mold/ blossom blight’ – another fungal disease of banana caused by Botrytis cinerea.
Viruses form a minority amongst the pathogens afflicting banana (Hull, 2002). However, banana streak virus (BSV) formed an extreme case of parasitism before its genome sequence uncovered the molecular facts. Genome sequence assembly data allocated the endogenous viral sequences integrated at 24 loci spanning 10 chromosomes in Pahang genome. Molecular characterization identified them to belong to badnavirus group that differed from the endogenous BSV species (eBSV) found in M. Balbisiana, which are known to be capable of vertical transmission. Further, it was observed that these viral sequences in banana genome have lost their original form and integrity and, therefore, can not seemingly form free infectious particles leading to disease. Conclusion from recent genomic study refuted the earlier understanding that integrated viral elements in banana genome are capable of expression and can give rise to de novo viral infection (Harper et al., 2002; Iskra-Caruana et al., 2010) leading to disease pandemism.
Mechanism of Dwarfing in Banana
Commercially cultivated bananas are tall order plants measuring more than two meter in height. The taller canopy makes them vulnerable to high velocity wind, low/high cyclonic typhoons that break the pseudo-stem and ushers irreparable loss to commercial plantations. Therefore, dwarf variety of banana is the desirable ideotype to reap the advantages of efficient agronomic procedures like high density planting and timely cultural practices. Genetically, it has been shown that dwarfism in plants is associated with the reduction of bio-available gibberellic acid (GA). The famous high-yielding semi-dwarf variety of rice (IR8) which ushered in the ‘Green Revolution’ was accomplished due to a mutation in the sd1 gene. This gene is involved in the biosynthesis of gibberellin and the mutation attenuates the GA biosynthesis there by making the rice plant semi-dwarf. Thus, identification of dwarfism related genes in banana was of paramount importance. Recently, a mutant of ‘Williams’ variety of banana was developed (Chen et al., 2016) that exhibited reduced height (approximately 1.7 m) and their pseudo-stem showed better mechanical strength compared to its progenitor. Using the information from banana genome, it was elucidated that gibberellic acid plays a pivotal role in its dwarfism. Genome-wide screening using contrasting banana genotypes further revealed that 36 genes are involved in GA metabolism in banana. While dwarf banana had differential expression of genes involved in GA homeostasis, the young fruits were observed to be the sites of GA metabolism that contribute to fruit length. Identification of GA metabolism genes will expedite application of molecular techniques such as CRISPR/CAS9 (Cong et al., 2013; Li et al., 2013) to tinker GA homeostasis to develop dwarf banana.
Parthenocarpy
Banana garners huge demand in human consumption due to its seedless fleshy fruit. The ability of plants to bear seed-less fruit (without pollination and fertilization) is due to the phenomenon known as “Parthenocarpy.” Additionally, female sterility is also hypothesized to be the cause of parthenocarpy in many fruits including banana (Dodds and Simmonds, 1948; Simmonds, 1953, 1962). Parthenocarpy in banana is believed to be the manifestation of A genome (Simmonds, 1962). Growth promoting phytohormones such as auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins and absiscic acid are also reported to be involved in parthenocarpy in melon (Talon et al., 1992) and tomato (Fos et al., 2000; Ding et al., 2013). Though intrinsic mechanism of natural parthenocarpy in plants is still unresolved, it is observed that natural parthenocarpic fruits such as banana (Khalifah, 1966) and mandarin (Talon et al., 1990, 1992) record increase in auxin and gibberellins level while levels of ABA declines (Talon et al., 1990). Genetically, parthenocarpy may happen due to a single partially dominant gene as in cucurbits (Kim et al., 1992; Menezes et al., 2005) or due to a single recessive gene as in sweet pepper (Tiwari et al., 2011) or due pleiotropy of major and minor genes as in brinjal/eggplant (Miyatake et al., 2012). In case of banana, parthenocarpy is hypothesized (Sardos et al., 2016) to be due to a major dominant gene (P or P1) interacting with minor ones (Simmonds, 1953). With decoding of structural genome of banana, discovery of the precise mechanism of parthenocarpy will give a boost to quality fruit production in commercial plantation.
Banana Ripening
Ripening in fruits is a natural phenomenon by which they taste sweeter and gain palatability. Biochemically, it begins with concomitant increase in acidity till a level (brix-acid ratio) when fruits taste/smell tarter. Being a climacteric fruit, ripening in banana is an important phenological event. Edible cultivated bananas are triploids with AAA, AAB and ABB genomic composition of which the A-genome (M. balbisiana) has been associated with banana pre-harvest development and post-harvest ripening (Davey, 2013). Cultivars possessing more of A-genome exhibit high yield, long fingers, and long-term storage (Hu et al., 2015) an attribute of best fruit quality. Post-genomic research has strongly indicated role of the bZIP transcription factors in fruit development process in many crops (Levi et al., 2006; Costa and Alba, 2010; Rohrmann et al., 2011). Recently, extensive involvement of bZIPs and WRKY in fruit development and post-harvest ripening has been demonstrated (Goel et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2016a) by comparing its expression pattern at different stages of banana development. The high expression levels of MabZIPs in fruit developmental and ripening is postulated to control the fruit quality of banana. Another transcription factor MaDEAR1 (repressor) is reported to be negatively involved in cell wall modification and softening of banana (Fan et al., 2016). With development of suitable transformation/regeneration techniques (Uma et al., 2011, 2012) these TFs will be targets of modulation in banana for best quality looms.
Abiotic Stress Tolerance
Due to inherent rapid rate of growth, shallow root system and permanent green canopy, banana requires abundant supply of water (van Asten et al., 2011) for optimum yield potential. The B-genome of banana has been the target for breeding programs (Davey, 2013; Hu et al., 2015) as it imparts intrinsic tolerances to both biotic and abiotic stresses. In M. balbisiana the B-genome imparts (i) resistance to infection of Xanthomonas and (ii) tolerance to drought/water stress (Tripathi et al., 2007; Vanhove et al., 2012; Davey, 2013). At molecular level, it has been reported that multiple bZIP transcription factors are involved in imparting tolerance against cold, drought and salt stress in banana (van Asten et al., 2011), beans (Rodriguez-Uribe and O’Connell, 2006), brachypodium (Liu and Chu, 2015) and rice (Liu et al., 2012). In fact, the cultivars containing the B-genome has been reported to exhibit higher tolerance to abiotic stresses (Hu et al., 2015). Gene expression analysis in banana showed 74% bZIP genes had increased transcription levels under cold, drought, and salt stresses. Commensurate increase in transcription levels was also observed in other plants such as cassava (Hu et al., 2016b), Brachypodium distachyon (Liu and Chu, 2015) and maize (Wei et al., 2012). Post-genomic discovery of bZIPs (Hu et al., 2016a), microRNAs (Chai et al., 2015) along with key metabolites (Pandey et al., 2016) is expected to expedite the molecular breeding process by ushering in, understanding the role, these transcription factors in signal transduction, developmental processes and responses to abiotic stress in banana.
Conclusion and Future Perspective
Banana has remained practically untouched by the ‘Green Revolution’ because of the difficulties encountered in conventional breeding programs in this genetically sterile triploid crop. Inter alia, being the most consumed fruit banana has immense capability to contribute to food security through higher and stable yields. It has been a challenge for banana breeders to produce disease resistant polyploid hybrids through genetic recombination. Like other crops (Dash et al., 2014), availability of structural genome information has opened up vistas to saturate the genome with molecular markers which would enable banana researchers to select good plant type at an early stage in commercial plantation. Structural genomics of banana has further delineated molecular mechanisms of dwarfing, imparting disease resistance, role of phyto-hormones in parthenocarpy and pivotal role of transcription factors in formation of this iconic fruit. Now, it will provide impetus to Musa researchers to apply functional genomics and comparative genome analysis to identify, clone, and characterize genes responsible for key agronomic traits as well as biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. As of today, the mechanism of action and the inter-connection of various signaling cascades remain largely unknown in banana. Functional analysis to unravel regulatory details small-, micro-, and si-RNAs and their role in the stress responses and hormone signaling will provide useful information for translational research in banana. As our molecular understanding advances, biotechnological interventions such as gene discovery, genetic engineering, targeted transformation/regeneration, and progressive bioinformatic tools (Martin et al., 2016) coupled with validated markers (Backiyarani et al., 2013) will accelerate breeding and super-domestication of banana will be a reality soon.
Author Contributions
PD planned, collected information, organized, and prepared the manuscript. RR designed and contributed for writing and reviewing the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Todd P. Michael, Monsanto (USA) and Dr. Rohini Sreevathsa for giving initial input and critical reading of the MS. We sincerely apologize to those researchers whose work could not be cited due to space limitations.
Footnotes
References
- Backiyarani S., Uma S., Varathraja P., Saraswathi M. (2013). Mining of EST-SSR markers of Musa and their transferability studies among the members of order the Zingiberales. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 169 228–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chai J., Feng R., Shi H., Ren M., Zhang Y., Wang J. (2015). Bioinformatic identification and expression analysis of banana microRNAs and their targets. PLoS ONE 10:e0123083 10.1371/journal.pone.0123083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J., Xie J., Duan Y., Hu H., Hu Y., Li W. (2016). Genome-wide identification and expression profiling reveal tissue-specific expression and differentially-regulated genes involved in gibberellin metabolism between Williams banana and its dwarf mutant. BMC Plant Biol. 16:123 10.1186/s12870-016-0809-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cong L., Ran F. A., Cox D., Lin S., Barretto R., Habib N., et al. (2013). Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339 819–823. 10.1126/science.1231143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costa F., Alba R. (2010). Use of homologous and heterologous gene expression profiling tools to characterize transcription dynamics during apple fruit maturation and ripening. BMC Plant Biol. 10:229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dash P. K., Cao Y., Jailani A. K., Gupta P., Venglat P., Xiang D., et al. (2014). Genome-wide analysis of drought induced gene expression changes in flax (Linum usitatissimum). GM Crops Food 5 106–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davey M. (2013). A draft Musa balbisiana genome sequence for molecular genetics in polyploid, inter-and intra-specific Musa hybrids. BMC Genomics 14:683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D’Hont A., Denoeud F., Aury J.-M., Baurens F.-C., Carreel F., Garsmeur O., et al. (2012). The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants. Nature 488 213–217. 10.1038/nature11241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ding J., Chen B., Xia X., Mao W., Shi K., Zhou Y., et al. (2013). Cytokinin-induced parthenocarpic fruit development in tomato is partly dependent on enhanced gibberellin and auxin biosynthesis. PLoS ONE 8:e70080 10.1371/journal.pone.0070080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dodds K. S., Simmonds N. W. (1948). Sterility and parthenocarpy in diploid hybrids of Musa. Heredity (Edinb.) 2 101–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fan Z., Kuang J., Fu C., Shan W., Han Y., Xiao Y., et al. (2016). The banana transcriptional repressor MaDEAR1 negatively regulates cell wall-modifying genes involved in fruit Ripening. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1201 10.3389/fpls.2016.01021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira C., Silva S. (2004). Molecular characterization of banana (AA) diploids with contrasting levels of black and yellow sigatoka resistance. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 1 276–278. [Google Scholar]
- Fos M., Nuez F., García-Martínez J. L. (2000). The gene pat-2 which induces natural parthenocarpy, alters the gibberellin content in unpollinated tomato ovaries. Plant Physiol. 122 471–480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goel R., Pandey A., Trivedi P. K., Asif M. H. (2016). Genome-wide analysis of the Musa WRKY gene family: evolution and differential expression during development and stress. Front. Plant Sci. 7:299 10.3389/fpls.2016.00299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harper G., Hull R., Lockhart B., Olszewski N. (2002). Viral sequences integrated into plant genomes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 40 119–136. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heslop-Harrison J. S., Schwarzacher T. (2007). Domestication, genomics and the future for banana. Ann. Bot. 100 1073–1084. 10.1093/aob/mcm191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horry J. P., Jay M. (1990). “An evolutionary background of bananas as deduced from flavonoids diversification in Identification of genetic diversity in the genus,” in Proceedings of an International Workshop, Los Banos, Philippines ed. Jarret R. L. (Montpellier: INIBAP; ) 5–10. [Google Scholar]
- Hu W., Wang L., Tie W., Yan Y., Ding Z., Liu J., et al. (2016a). Genome-wide analyses of the bZIP family reveal their involvement in the development, ripening and abiotic stress response in banana. Sci. Rep. 6:30203 10.1038/srep30203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu W., Yang H., Yan Y., Wei Y., Tie W., Ding Z., et al. (2016b). Genome-wide characterization and analysis of bZIP transcription factor gene family related to abiotic stress in cassava. Sci. Rep. 6:22783 10.1038/srep22783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu W., Zuo J., Hou X., Yan Y., Wei Y., Liu J., et al. (2015). The auxin response factor gene family in banana: genome-wide identification and expression analyses during development, ripening, and abiotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 6:742 10.3389/fpls.2015.00742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hull R. (2002). Matthews Plant Virology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 743–812. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang S., Ko W. (2004). Cavendish banana cultivars resistant to Fusarium wilt acquired through somaclonal variation in Taiwan. Plant Dis. 88 580–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iskra-Caruana M.-L., Baurens F.-C., Gayral P., Chabannes M. (2010). A four-partner plant–virus interaction: enemies can also come from within. Mol. Plant. Microbe Interact. 23 1394–1402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khalifah R. A. (1966). Gibberellin-like substances from the developing banana fruit. Plant Physiol. 41 771–773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim I. S., Okubo H., Fujieda K. (1992). Endogenous levels of IAA in relation to parthenocarpy in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam) 52 1–8. 10.1016/0304-4238(92)90002-T [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Levi A., Davis A., Hernandez A., Wechter P., Thimmapuram J., Trebitsh T., et al. (2006). Genes expressed during the development and ripening of watermelon fruit. Plant Cell Rep. 25 1233–1245. 10.1007/s00299-006-0163-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li J.-F., Norville J. E., Aach J., McCormack M., Zhang D., Bush J., et al. (2013). Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 31 688–691. 10.1038/nbt.2654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu C., Wu Y., Wang X. (2012). bZIP transcription factor OsbZIP52/RISBZ5: a potential negative regulator of cold and drought stress response in rice. Planta 235 1157–1169. 10.1007/s00425-011-1564-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X., Chu Z. (2015). Genome-wide evolutionary characterization and analysis of bZIP transcription factors and their expression profiles in response to multiple abiotic stresses in Brachypodium distachyon. BMC Genomics 16:227 10.1186/s12864-015-1457-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin G., Baurens F.-C., Cardi C., Aury J.-M., D’Hont A. (2013). The complete chloroplast genome of banana (Musa acuminata, Zingiberales): insight into plastid monocotyledon evolution. PLoS ONE 8:e67350 10.1371/journal.pone.0067350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin G., Baurens F.-C., Droc G., Rouard M., Cenci A., Kilian A., et al. (2016). Improvement of the banana “Musa acuminata” reference sequence using NGS data and semi-automated bioinformatics methods. BMC Genomics 17:243 10.1186/s12864-016-2579-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menezes C. B., de Maluf W. R., Azevedo S. M., de Faria M. V., Nascimento I. R., Nogueira D. W., et al. (2005). Inheritance of parthenocarpy in summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.). Genet. Mol. Res. 4 39–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miyatake K., Saito T., Negoro S., Yamaguchi H., Nunome T., Ohyama A., et al. (2012). Development of selective markers linked to a major QTL for parthenocarpy in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 124 1403–1413. 10.1007/s00122-012-1796-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore N., Bentley S., Pegg K., Jones D. (1995). Musa Disease Fact Sheet No 5. Disease Banana. Montpellier: INIBAP. [Google Scholar]
- Ortiz R. (1995). Factors influencing seed set in triploid Musa spp. L. and production of euploid hybrids. Ann. Bot. 75 151–155. 10.1006/anbo.1995.1006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pandey A., Alok A., Lakhwani D., Singh J., Asif M. H., Trivedi P. K. (2016). Genome-wide expression analysis and metabolite profiling elucidate transcriptional regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis and modulation under abiotic stresses in banana. Sci. Rep. 6:31361 10.1038/srep31361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perrier X., Bakry F., Carreel F., Jenny C., Horry J.-P., Lebot V., et al. (2009). Combining biological approaches to shed light on the evolution of edible bananas. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 7 199–216. [Google Scholar]
- Perrier X., De Langhe E., Donohue M., Lentfer C., Vrydaghs L., Bakry F., et al. (2011). Multidisciplinary perspectives on banana (Musa spp.) domestication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 11311–11318. 10.1073/pnas.1102001108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez-Uribe L., O’Connell M. A. (2006). A root-specific bZIP transcription factor is responsive to water deficit stress in tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) and common bean (P. vulgaris). J. Exp. Bot. 57 1391–1398. 10.1093/jxb/erj118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rohrmann J., Tohge T., Alba R., Osorio S., Caldana C., McQuinn R., et al. (2011). Combined transcription factor profiling, microarray analysis and metabolite profiling reveals the transcriptional control of metabolic shifts occurring during tomato fruit development. Plant J. 68 999–1013. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04750.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saraswathi M. (2011). Assessing the robustness of IRAP and RAPD marker systems to study intra-group diversity among Cavendish (AAA) clones of banana. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 86 7–12. [Google Scholar]
- Saraswathi M. S., Kannan G., Uma S., Thangavelu R., Backiyarani S. (2016). Improvement of banana cv. Rasthali (Silk, AAB) against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense (VCG 0124/5) through induced mutagenesis: determination of LD50 specific to mutagen, explants, toxins and in vitro and in vivo screening for Fusarium wilt resistance. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 54 345–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sardos J., Rouard M., Hueber Y., Cenci A., Hyma K. E., Van Den Houwe I., et al. (2016). A genome-wide association study on the seedless phenotype in banana (Musa spp.) reveals the potential of a selected panel to detect candidate genes in a vegetatively propagated crop. PLoS ONE 11:e01 10.1371/journal.pone.0154448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharrock S., Frison E. (1998). Musa production around the world-trends, varieties and regional importance. INIBAP Annu. Rep. 1998 42–47. [Google Scholar]
- Simmonds N. (1962). The Evolution of the Bananas. London: Longmans; 170. [Google Scholar]
- Simmonds N. W. (1953). The development of the banana fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 4 87–105. 10.1093/jxb/4.1.87 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Singh N. K., Gupta D. K., Jayaswal P. K., Mahato A. K., Dutta S., Singh S., et al. (2012). The first draft of the pigeonpea genome sequence. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 21 98–112. 10.1007/s13562-011-0088-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sreedharan S., Shekhawat U. K. S., Ganapathi T. R. (2013). Transgenic banana plants overexpressing a native plasma membrane aquaporin MusaPIP1;2 display high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11 942–952. 10.1111/pbi.12086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Talon M., Zacarias L., Primo-Millo E. (1990). Hormonal changes associated with fruit set and development in mandarins differing in their parthenocarpic ability. Physiol. Plant. 79 400–406. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1990.tb06759.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Talon M., Zacarias L., Primo-Millo E. (1992). Gibberellins and parthenocarpic ability in developing ovaries of seedless mandarins. Plant Physiol. 99 1575–1581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tiwari A., Vivian-Smith A., Voorrips R. E., Habets M. E. J., Xue L. B., Offringa R., et al. (2011). Parthenocarpic potential in Capsicum annuum L. is enhanced by carpelloid structures and controlled by a single recessive gene. BMC Plant Biol. 11:143 10.1186/1471-2229-11-143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tripathi L., Odipio J., Tripathi J. N., Tusiime G. (2007). A rapid technique for screening banana cultivars for resistance to Xanthomonas wilt. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 121 9–19. 10.1007/s10658-007-9235-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Uma S., Lakshmi S., Saraswathi M. (2011). Embryo rescue and plant regeneration in banana (Musa spp.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 105 105–111. [Google Scholar]
- Uma S., Lakshmi S., Saraswathi M. (2012). Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from immature and mature zygotic embryos of Musa acuminata ssp. burmannica. Invitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 48 539–545. [Google Scholar]
- Uma S., Saraswathi M., Siva S. A., Dhivya Vandana M. S., Manickavasagam M., Durai P., et al. (2008). Diversity and phylogenetic relationships among wild and cultivated bananas (Silk-AAB) revealed by SSR markers. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 83 239–245. [Google Scholar]
- van Asten P. J. A., Fermont A. M., Taulya G. (2011). Drought is a major yield loss factor for rainfed East African highland banana. Agric. Water Manag. 98 541–552. 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vanhove A.-C., Vermaelen W., Panis B., Swennen R., Carpentier S. C. (2012). Screening the banana biodiversity for drought tolerance: can an in vitro growth model and proteomics be used as a tool to discover tolerant varieties and understand homeostasis. Front. Plant Sci. 3:176 10.3389/fpls.2012.00176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Varshney R. K., Chen W., Li Y., Bharti A. K., Saxena R. K., Schlueter J. A., et al. (2012). Draft genome sequence of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), an orphan legume crop of resource-poor farmers. Nat. Biotechnol. 30 83–89. 10.1038/nbt.2022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vishnevetsky J., White T. L., Palmateer A. J., Flaishman M., Cohen Y., Elad Y., et al. (2011). Improved tolerance toward fungal diseases in transgenic Cavendish banana (Musa spp. AAA group) cv. Grand Nain. Transgenic Res. 20 61–72. 10.1007/s11248-010-9392-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z., Hobson N., Galindo L., Zhu S., Shi D., McDill J., et al. (2012). The genome of flax (Linum usitatissimum) assembled de novo from short shotgun sequence reads. Plant J. 72 461–473. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05093.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WBF: Statistics and data (2012). Banana Statistics and Data. Available at: http://www.fao.org/economic/worldbananaforum/statistics/en/ [Google Scholar]
- Wei K., Chen J., Wang Y., Chen Y., Chen S., Lin Y., et al. (2012). Genome-wide analysis of bZIP-encoding genes in maize. DNA Res. 19 463–476. 10.1093/dnares/dss026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu W., Yang Y.-L., He W.-M., Rouard M., Li W.-M., Xu M., et al. (2016). Whole genome sequencing of a banana wild relative Musa itinerans provides insights into lineage-specific diversification of the Musa genus. Sci. Rep. 6:31586 10.1038/srep31586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]