Skip to main content
The Journal of Reproduction and Development logoLink to The Journal of Reproduction and Development
. 2016 Jun 18;62(5):487–493. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2016-009

Disrupting the circadian photo-period alters the release of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, progesterone, and estradiol in maternal and fetal sheep

Qinqin GAO 1,*, Juanxiu LV 1,*, Weisheng LI 1, Pengjie ZHANG 1, Jianying TAO 1, Zhice XU 1,2
PMCID: PMC5081736  PMID: 27319751

Abstract

Although a large number of studies show that photo-period disruption potentially affects hormone secretion in mammals, information about the effects of circadian photo-period disruption during pregnancy on fetal blood reproductive hormone levels is scarce. This study used ewes and their fetuses to determine the effects of circadian photo-period disruption (deprivation of darkness) on follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and progesterone in maternal and fetal circulation at late gestation. Pregnant ewes (gestational age: 135 ± 3 days) were randomly placed into control and dark deprivation groups. The control (N = 5) and dark deprivation (N = 5) groups were exposed to a fixed 12 h light/12 h dark cycle and a 24 h constant light cycle, respectively, for 2 days. Dark deprivation up-regulated follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol levels and down-regulated progesterone levels in both maternal and fetal circulation, and up-regulated luteinizing hormone levels in fetal but not maternal circulation. These results provide new information about how circadian photo-period disruption during pregnancy could alter the release of certain reproductive hormones into fetal blood, which may influence the development of fetal organs in utero, as well as long-term health.

Keywords: Fetuses, Photo-period disruption, Reproductive hormones


In mammals, the photo-period is a crucial environmental cue that drives the circadian time-keeping system in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus. Circadian photo-period is vital to many animals, since a number of physiological activities are related to photo-period signals [1,2,3]. For example, in mammals, disrupting circadian photo-period could alter the secretion of numerous hormones [4,5,6,7,8,9,10], and recent studies on dairy heifers and sheep showed that prolactin concentrations were changed by photo-period manipulation [4, 5]. The circadian photo-period is also involved in regulating the secretion of many important reproductive hormones including luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol, and progesterone in non-pregnant mammals [6,7,8,9,10]. In addition, recent studies have shown that expression of the clock and clock-controlled ovarian stromal genes synchronized by the environmental photo-period play a role in ovarian hormone synthesis, suggesting that the circadian photo-period manipulates hormone secretion, potentially via the molecular clockwork mechanism [11, 12]. While it has been confirmed that circadian photo-period can manipulate hormone secretion, the exact mechanism(s) remains unknown.

Previous studies have shown dynamic changes in reproductive hormones in pregnant women [13, 14]. Pulsatile secretion of LH and FSH in maternal circulation suggested these hormones might be involved in maintaining pregnancy. In the absence of pregnancy, estradiol and progesterone are produced in high amounts in mammalian ovaries. In pregnant women and sheep, estradiol and progesterone are increased because of placental secretion [15, 16]. The concentration of estradiol and progesterone in the peripheral plasma of maternal and fetal sheep gradually increases during pregnancy progression [17, 18]. Studies on baboons and humans have demonstrated that estradiol also promotes uterine blood flow, cervical softening at term and that it is essential for initiating labor in the third trimester of pregnancy [19, 20]. In addition, studies on pregnant women have indicated that a decrease in progesterone levels is critical for the initiation of labor [21, 22]. Together, the pulsatile secretion of these reproductive hormones seems to play an important role in pregnancy.

In mammals, hormone secretion throughout pregnancy is also closely related to the circadian photo-period [23, 24]. For example, disrupting the circadian photo-period in sheep perturbs glucose metabolism and prolactin secretion during pregnancy [23, 24]. However, to date, there is limited information regarding the effects of photo-period disruption in pregnancy on maternal and fetal reproductive hormone secretion. This study aimed to determine the changes in FSH, LH, estradiol, and progesterone levels upon disruption of the circadian photo-period in both maternal and fetal sheep. The findings provide new information regarding the relationship between circadian photo-period and fetal hormone secretion in utero in late pregnancy.

Materials and Methods

Animals

All of the pregnant ewes (gestational age: 121–136 days, term: 147 ± 3 days, all singleton) used in this study had histories of normal pregnancy and healthy offspring. The ewes were housed in a light-controlled room with standard food and water, and allowed to rest for 2 days prior to surgery. All surgical and experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, and conformed to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Surgical operation

Pregnant sheep were given general anesthesia, which was initiated by intramuscular administration of 20 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride and maintained with 1 l/min of oxygen and 3% isoflurane. Polyethylene catheters were inserted into the maternal femoral artery and vein, and subsequently tunneled to an incision on the left flank. The uterus was opened via a small hysterotomy to provide access to a fetal hindlimb. After insertion of polyethylene catheters into the femoral artery of female fetuses, the uterine incisions were closed in layers with silk sutures. All polyethylene catheters were tunneled to the flank incision and placed in a cloth pouch attached to the flank of the ewe. After surgery, pregnant sheep were allowed to recover for a minimum of 4–5 days before experimental manipulation of environmental light. During post-surgery recovery, a daily dose of antibiotics was administered intravenously to both the ewes (70 mg gentamicin and 1g oxacillin) and the fetuses (10 mg gentamicin and 20 mg oxacillin).

Experimental design

The pregnant ewes (gestational age: 135 ± 3 days) were randomly placed into the control and dark deprivation groups. The control (N = 5, LD) were kept indoors and exposed to a fixed cycle of 12 h light (0800–2000 h) and 12 h dark (2000–0800 h). The dark deprivation group (N = 5, LL) was exposed to constant light from 0800 h of the first day to 2000 h of third day, having been deprived of two nights. Blood samples were collected from 2100 h on the second day until 1800 h on the third day. Maternal (4 ml for each sample) and fetal (3 ml for each sample) arterial blood samples were collected in test tubes with anticoagulant from the implanted catheters every 3 h. Blood samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min, and plasma was transferred to new tubes, shock frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C until further analysis. For the control group, blood samples were collected in the night using a flashlight covered with red cloth. Figure 1 shows the pattern of light-dark cycling and the timing of blood sampling for the two groups.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Pattern of the light-dark cycle and timing of blood collection (black arrows) for the control (LD) and dark deprivation (LL) groups. Maternal and fetal blood samples were collected every 3 h from 2100 h of the second day to 1800 h of the third day.

Blood values analysis

Blood samples (1 ml for each sampling) were withdrawn from the fetal and maternal arterial catheters to measure blood oxygen partial pressure (PO2), carbon dioxide partial pressure (PCO2), lactate (Lac), hematocrit (Hct), electrolyte concentrations (Na+, K+ and Ca++), and pH on a blood gas analyzer GEM Premier 3000 (Instrumentation Laboratory Company, Lexington, U.S.A.). All experiments were performed on the animals with fetal blood at pH ≥ 7.30.

Radioimmunoassay

A radioimmunoassay (RIA) was used to measure plasma hormone concentrations. Plasma levels of LH, FSH, progesterone, and estradiol were determined by double antibody RIA using a RIA kit (HY-10286, HY-10176, HY-10028 and HY-10029), according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Beijing Huaying Biotechnology Research Institute, China). Sensitivity for FSH, LH, progesterone, and estradiol was 0.01 mIU/ml, 0.01 mIU/ml, 0.05 ng/ml, and 0.01 pg/ml, respectively. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficient of variation (CV) were approximately 3.0–6.7% and 7.5–9.9%, respectively. The samples and data were handled in a blind manner.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were conducted using Graph Pad Prism 5 (Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Significance (P < 0.05) was determined by t-test or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), where appropriate. The effects of dark deprivation and time on maternal and fetal reproductive hormones between the LD and LL groups were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-tests. The mean values of maternal or fetal reproductive hormones in “Day” and “Night” between the two groups were also analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-tests. The mean values of maternal or fetal reproductive hormones over 24 h were compared between the two groups using t-tests. Maternal and fetal blood values were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-tests. Statistical significance was accepted when P < 0.05. All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Results

Maternal and fetal arterial blood values

There was no significant difference in the maternal and fetal arterial blood values (including PO2, PCO2, Lac, Hct, Na+, K+, Ca++, and pH) between the control and dark deprivation groups (Tables 1 and 2, N = 10, all P > 0.05). There was also no significant change in maternal and fetal arterial blood values at various time points. All maternal and fetal arterial values were within normal ranges and did not vary significantly between the control and dark deprivation groups (all P > 0.05).

Table 1. Maternal blood values.

2400 h
0600 h
1200 h
1800 h
LL LD LL LD LL LD LL LD
pH 7.42 ± 0.03 7.40 ± 0.02 7.45 ± 0.02 7.45 ± 0.03 7.46 ± 0.02 7.45 ± 0.03 7.40 ± 0.02 7.43 ± 0.02
PCO2 (mmHg) 25.03 ± 3.12 24.20 ± 3.52 25.08 ± 4.32 24.43 ± 4.20 23.80 ± 5.00 25.00 ± 3.30 23.46 ± 4.00 24.17 ± 4.08
PO2 (mmHg) 118.00 ± 4.00 116.00 ± 3.00 117.00 ± 3.00 119.00 ± 2.00 119.00 ± 4.00 119.00 ± 4.00 120.00 ± 2.00 121.00 ± 2.00
Na+ (mmol/l) 142.00 ± 3.00 141.00 ± 3.00 143.00 ± 5.00 140.00 ± 5.00 141.00 ± 4.00 140.00 ± 3.00 144.00 ± 3.00 143.00 ± 3.00
K+ (mmol/l) 3.92 ± 0.30 3.84 ± 0.32 4.07 ± 0.41 3.82 ± 0.52 3.81 ± 0.48 3.90 ± 0.20 3.88 ± 0.26 3.98 ± 0.28
Ca++ (mmol/l) 1.99 ± 0.06 1.97 ± 0.05 1.97 ± 0.05 1.94 ± 0.06 1.96 ± 0.05 1.98 ± 0.05 1.92 ± 0.04 1.98 ± 0.03
Lac (mmol/l) 1.33 ± 0.30 1.40 ± 0.29 1.31 ± 0.22 1.33 ± 0.31 1.28 ± 0.47 1.29 ± 0.42 1.34 ± 0.45 1.36 ± 0.42
Hct (%) 35.43 ± 4.86 34.67 ± 4.78 33.28 ± 6.12 35.15 ± 6.09 34.12 ± 4.56 35.20 ± 3.34 35.30 ± 5.09 33.87 ± 4.28

Table 2. Fetal blood values.

2400 h
0600 h
1200 h
1800 h
LL LD LL LD LL LD LL LD
pH 7.38 ± 0.03 7.36 ± 0.02 7.36 ± 0.01 7.37 ± 0.02 7.35 ± 0.02 7.36 ± 0.02 7.37 ± 0.03 7.35 ± 0.03
PCO2 (mmHg) 53.50 ± 4.08 54.30 ± 3.15 53.50 ± 3.59 52.80 ± 4.62 52.92 ± 4.03 52.71 ± 4.34 53.11 ± 3.17 53.06 ± 4.90
PO2 (mmHg) 22.45 ± 3.19 20.30 ± 4.06 21.80 ± 3.68 22.42 ± 2.80 22.30 ± 3.59 22.55 ± 2.78 21.82 ± 3.05 23.16 ± 5.09
Na+ (mmol/l) 142.00 ± 2.00 145.00 ± 3.00 143.00 ± 4.00 145.00 ± 3.00 144.00 ± 2.00 144.00 ± 3.00 143.00 ± 3.00 142.00 ± 3.00
K+ (mmol/l) 3.74 ± 0.32 3.80 ± 0.39 3.90 ± 0.28 3.99 ± 0.29 3.80 ± 0.36 3.89 ± 0.20 3.87 ± 0.27 3.84 ± 0.20
Ca++ (mmol/l) 1.29 ± 0.05 1.32 ± 0.04 1.29 ± 0.04 1.29 ± 0.05 1.28 ± 0.05 1.31 ± 0.04 1.28 ± 0.04 1.29 ± 0.05
Lac (mmol/l) 2.24 ± 0.28 2.10 ± 0.34 1.99 ± 0.44 1.80 ± 0.20 2.20 ± 0.39 2.10 ± 0.43 1.90 ± 0.43 2.07 ± 0.27
Hct (%) 25.15 ± 3.45 24.08 ± 3.56 23.20 ± 4.71 25.39 ± 5.42 24.28 ± 3.64 25.28 ± 3.09 23.50 ± 4.17 24.45 ± 5.10

Effect of night deprivation on maternal and fetal FSH levels

Although FSH levels were not significantly increased at each testing point in both maternal and fetal blood (Fig. 2(A) and (D), P > 0.05), mean FSH levels over 24 h were significantly higher in the dark deprivation group than in the control group (Fig. 2(C), P < 0.05; Fig. 2(F), P < 0.01). FSH levels in both the maternal ewes and fetuses during “Day” or “Night” periods were not significantly different between the LD and LL groups (Fig. 2(B) and (E), P > 0.05).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Effect of dark deprivation on both maternal and fetal blood FSH levels (A–C), and on fetal blood FSH levels (D–F). “Day” and “Night” refer to 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness for the LD group, and two 12 h periods of light for the LL group. N = 10; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

Effect of night deprivation on maternal and fetal LH levels

In females, LH is necessary to maintain luteal functions and it acts synergistically with FSH to regulate estrogen levels. Here, there were no significant differences in maternal blood LH levels at each time point, during “Day” and “Night”, or over a 24 h period between the control and dark deprivation groups (Fig. 3(A), (B) and (C), P > 0.05). However, compared with the control group, fetal blood LH was significantly increased at 2100 h (P < 0.01), 0300 h (P < 0.05), and 1800 h (P < 0.05) in the dark deprivation group (Fig. 3(D)). LH levels in the fetuses were increased during the “Night” phase (Fig. 3(E), P < 0.05), as well as over a 24 h period (Fig. 3(F), P < 0.01).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Effect of dark deprivation on both maternal and fetal blood LH levels (A–C) and on fetal blood LH levels (D–F). N = 10; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

Effect of night deprivation on maternal and fetal estradiol levels

Compared with the control group, maternal blood estradiol levels in the dark deprivation group were significantly increased at 0300 h, 0600 h, and 0900 h (Fig 4(A), all P < 0.05). Fetal blood estradiol levels were also significantly elevated in the dark deprivation group at 0300 h (Fig. 4(D), P < 0.01) and 1200 h (Fig. 4(D), P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in maternal and fetal blood estradiol levels during “Day” or “Night” periods (Fig. 4(B) and (E), P > 0.05) between the two groups. Maternal and fetal blood estradiol levels were elevated over a 24 h period in the dark deprivation group (Fig. 4(C) and (F), P < 0.05).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Effect of dark deprivation on both maternal and fetal blood estradiol (E2) levels (A–C) and on fetal blood estradiol levels (D–F). N = 10; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.

Effect of night deprivation on blood progesterone levels

Plasma progesterone levels were markedly changed in both ewes and fetuses in the LL group (Fig. 5). Compared with the control group, maternal blood progesterone levels were significantly decreased at 2100 h (P < 0.001), 0300 h (P < 0.05), and 0600 h (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5(A)). Dark-deprived fetal blood progesterone levels were also significantly decreased at 2100 h (P < 0.001), 2400 h (P < 0.001), 0300 h (P < 0.01), 0600 h (P < 0.001), and 0900 h (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5(D)). Fig. 5(B) and (C) show that in the dark deprivation group, maternal blood progesterone was decreased during the “Night” period, and the average of progesterone levels were lower over a 24 h period than that of the control group. Fetal blood progesterone was also decreased during the “Night” period (Fig. 5(E), P < 0.001), as well as over a 24 h period (Fig. 5(F), P < 0.01) in the dark deprivation group.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Effect of dark deprivation on both maternal and fetal blood progesterone (P) levels (A–C), and on fetal blood progesterone levels (D–F). N = 10; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Discussion

Although disruption of circadian photo-period has been reported to affect hormone secretion in mammals, little is known about the effects of circadian photo-period disruption during pregnancy on the secretion of reproductive hormones in fetal blood. Deprivation of darkness resulted in FSH and estradiol up-regulation, and down-regulation of progesterone levels in both maternal and fetal circulation. Dark deprivation also up-regulated LH levels in fetal blood, but did not influence maternal LH levels. This study indicates that disruption of normal environmental light patterns during pregnancy alters the release of some reproductive hormones in maternal and/or fetal circulation.

In this study, there was no significant change in maternal and fetal arterial blood values throughout the various time points. These remained at a stable physiological status, demonstrating that manipulation of photo-period during pregnancy had no effect on basic arterial values. However, in the dark deprivation group, mean fetal FSH and LH levels and maternal LH levels were significantly increased over 24 h, suggesting that the release of FSH and/or LH may be regulated by the circadian photo-period. This was the first study to demonstrate the effect of circadian photo-period disruption on FSH and/or LH release in maternal and fetal sheep during pregnancy, although other works have studied this in non-pregnant mammals [25, 26]. Although the actions of fetal FSH and LH during pregnancy are not fully understood, these disrupted photo-period-induced changes may have adverse effects on maternal and fetal endocrine system homeostasis, as well as the development of fetal organs in the third trimester of pregnancy. Notably, evidence accumulated in last three decades has demonstrated that prenatal insults may increase the risk of developing disease in later life [27, 28]. Therefore, the novel data in this study may not only increase our understanding of environmental or maternal influence on fetal reproductive system development related to circadian regulation, but also offer new avenues for further investigation of diseases with fetal origins.

In mammals, estradiol is important in regulating female reproductive cycles, and in the development and maintenance of female reproductive functions. In both pregnant women and sheep, plasma estradiol concentrations increase significantly, peaking during late pregnancy [15, 16, 29]. In late pregnancy, estradiol may promote uterine blood flow, stimulate cervical softening at term, and be essential for initiation of labor [19,20,21]. Estradiol also plays an important role in regulating fetal ovarian development in baboons [30]. In this study, mean estradiol levels in the circulation of ewes and fetuses over 24 h were significantly increased following dark deprivation. This suggests that photo-period disruption in late gestation may promote the initiation of labor via changes in estradiol levels, influencing fetal reproductive organ development and function.

Like estradiol, progesterone is also involved in the menstrual cycle, successful conception, embryogenesis, and continuation of pregnancy in humans and other species. Plasma concentrations of progesterone increase abruptly in the early weeks of pregnancy and remain at high levels throughout pregnancy [15, 16, 29]. Recent studies have suggested that a reduction in progesterone is critical for the initiation of labor [21, 22]. Progesterone also plays an important role in regulating fetal development [31]. In this study, both maternal and fetal plasma progesterone levels were remarkably decreased during the “Night” period in the dark deprivation group. This suggests that disruption of environmental photo-period in late gestation alters hormone concentrations in a way that may impact fetal development in utero potentially by promoting initiation of labor, resulting in preterm birth.

Although factors and mechanisms governing estradiol and progesterone secretion and release are complex during pregnancy, concentrations of these hormones in maternal and fetal blood may partially reflect placental functions, since previous studies have demonstrated that the placenta produces these hormones [15, 16]. Here, both estradiol and progesterone levels were altered by dark deprivation. The altered levels of these hormones in circulation may reflect the effect of dark deprivation on placental functions if there was a proportion of estradiol and progesterone originating from the placenta in the blood. Our study suggests that disrupting the photo-period may lead to placental endocrine dysfunctions, which may have adverse effects on maintenance of pregnancy and fetal development in utero.

Notably, accumulating evidence has shown that the circadian photo-period is initiated in the fetus in utero [32, 33]. Surgical disconnection of the fetal hypothalamus and pituitary result in abolished daily fetal plasma melatonin and prolactin rhythms [34]. Although it is difficult to discern whether the circulation of reproductive hormones in fetuses originated from the ewes, the placenta, or the fetus itself, the hormone curve similarities between the ewes and fetuses in both the control and experimental groups suggests that the main influence is maternal.

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this study was the first to show that dark deprivation not only influenced FSH and LH levels, but also affected estradiol and progesterone secretion at late gestation in fetal sheep, indicating that disruption of the photo-period during pregnancy could influence fetal reproductive hormone secretion. Further investigation is needed to determine whether those changes during pregnancy cause problems in fetal development as well as long-term health or the development of disease.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported partly by Grants 2013BAI04B05 and 2012CB947600, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81320108006, 81401244, and 81370714), Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation (BK20140292), and Suzhou science and technology support program (SYS201210 and SYS201451).

References

  • 1.Amaral FG, Castrucci AM, Cipolla-Neto J, Poletini MO, Mendez N, Richter HG, Sellix MT. Environmental control of biological rhythms: effects on development, fertility and metabolism. J Neuroendocrinol 2014; 26: 603–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ortavant R, Bocquier F, Pelletier J, Ravault JP, Thimonier J, Volland-Nail P. Seasonality of reproduction in sheep and its control by photoperiod. Aust J Biol Sci 1988; 41: 69–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Benstaali C, Bogdan A, Touitou Y. Effect of a short photoperiod on circadian rhythms of body temperature and motor activity in old rats. Pflugers Arch 2002; 444: 73–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lacasse P, Vinet CM, Petitclerc D. Effect of prepartum photoperiod and melatonin feeding on milk production and prolactin concentration in dairy heifers and cows. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97: 3589–3598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jin J, Yaegashi T, Hashizume T. Effects of photoperiod on the secretion of growth hormone and prolactin during nighttime in female goats. Anim Sci J 2013; 84: 130–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pelletier J, Ortavant R. Photoperiodic control of LH release in the ram. II. Light-androgens interaction. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1975; 78: 442–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sanford LM, Voglmayr JK, Vale WW, Robaire B. Photoperiod-mediated increases in serum concentrations of inhibin, follicle-stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone are accentuated in adult shortened-scrotum rams without corresponding decreases in testosterone and estradiol. Biol Reprod 1993; 49: 365–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lincoln GA, Baker BI. Seasonal and photoperiod-induced changes in the secretion of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone in Soay sheep: temporal relationships with changes in beta-endorphin, prolactin, follicle-stimulating hormone, activity of the gonads and growth of wool and horns. J Endocrinol 1995; 144: 471–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Langford GA, Ainsworth L, Marcus GJ, Shrestha JN. Photoperiod entrainment of testosterone, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and prolactin cycles in rams in relation to testis size and semen quality. Biol Reprod 1987; 37: 489–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Galas J, Słomczyńska M, Pierściński A. Effect of photoperiod on the distribution patterns of androgen receptors and steroid hormone concentrations in ovaries of bank voles. Acta Histochem 2003; 105: 175–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Murphy BA, Blake CM, Brown JA, Martin AM, Forde N, Sweeney LM, Evans AC. Evidence of a molecular clock in the ovine ovary and the influence of photoperiod. Theriogenology 2015; 84: 208–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gómez-Brunet A, Santiago-Moreno J, del Campo A, Malpaux B, Chemineau P, Tortonese DJ, Gonzalez-Bulnes A, López-Sebastián A. Endogenous circannual cycles of ovarian activity and changes in prolactin and melatonin secretion in wild and domestic female sheep maintained under a long-day photoperiod. Biol Reprod 2008; 78: 552–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hirano M, Igarashi A, Suzuki M. Dynamic changes of serum LH and FSH during pregnancy and puerperium. Tohoku J Exp Med 1976; 118: 275–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kauppila A, Kivelä A, Kontula K, Tuimala R. Serum progesterone, estradiol, and estriol before and during induced labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137: 462–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Barrera D, Avila E, Hernández G, Halhali A, Biruete B, Larrea F, Díaz L. Estradiol and progesterone synthesis in human placenta is stimulated by calcitriol. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2007; 103: 529–532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Weems YS, Kim L, Tsuda V, Yin C, Weems CW. What regulates placental steroidogenesis in 90-day pregnant ewes? Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 2007; 84: 54–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vonnahme KA, Neville TL, Perry GA, Redmer DA, Reynolds LP, Caton JS. Maternal dietary intake alters organ mass and endocrine and metabolic profiles in pregnant ewe lambs. Anim Reprod Sci 2013; 141: 131–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lemley CO, Meyer AM, Neville TL, Hallford DM, Camacho LE, Maddock-Carlin KR, Wilmoth TA, Wilson ME, Perry GA, Redmer DA, Reynolds LP, Caton JS, Vonnahme KA. Dietary selenium and nutritional plane alter specific aspects of maternal endocrine status during pregnancy and lactation. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2014; 46: 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Aberdeen GW, Baschat AA, Harman CR, Weiner CP, Langenberg PW, Pepe GJ, Albrecht ED. Uterine and fetal blood flow indexes and fetal growth assessment after chronic estrogen suppression in the second half of baboon pregnancy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2010; 298: H881–H889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Aberdeen GW, Bonagura TW, Harman CR, Pepe GJ, Albrecht ED. Suppression of trophoblast uterine spiral artery remodeling by estrogen during baboon pregnancy: impact on uterine and fetal blood flow dynamics. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2012; 302: H1936–H1944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Konopka CK, Morais EN, Naidon D, Pereira AM, Rubin MA, Oliveira JF, Mello CF. Maternal serum progesterone, estradiol and estriol levels in successful dinoprostone-induced labor. Braz J Med Biol Res 2013; 46: 91–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Smith R, Smith JI, Shen X, Engel PJ, Bowman ME, McGrath SA, Bisits AM, McElduff P, Giles WB, Smith DW. Patterns of plasma corticotropin-releasing hormone, progesterone, estradiol, and estriol change and the onset of human labor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94: 2066–2074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Parraguez VH, Valenzuela GJ, Vergara M, Ducsay CA, Yellon SM, Serón-Ferré M. Effect of constant light on fetal and maternal prolactin rhythms in sheep. Endocrinology 1996; 137: 2355–2361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Varcoe TJ, Gatford KL, Voultsios A, Salkeld MD, Boden MJ, Rattanatray L, Kennaway DJ. Rapidly alternating photoperiods disrupt central and peripheral rhythmicity and decrease plasma glucose, but do not affect glucose tolerance or insulin secretion in sheep. Exp Physiol 2014; 99: 1214–1228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Oxender WD, Noden PA, Hafs HD. Estrus, ovulation, and serum progesterone, estradiol, and LH concentrations in mares after an increased photoperiod during winter. Am J Vet Res 1977; 38: 203–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chandrashekar V, Majumdar SS, Bartke A. Assessment of the role of follicle-stimulating hormone and prolactin in the control of testicular endocrine function in adult djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) exposed to either short or long photoperiod. Biol Reprod 1994; 50: 82–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bo L, Jiang L, Zhou A, Wu C, Li J, Gao Q, Zhang P, Lv J, Li N, Gu X, Zhu Z, Mao C, Xu Z. Maternal high-salt diets affected pressor responses and microvasoconstriction via PKC/BK channel signaling pathways in rat offspring. Mol Nutr Food Res 2015; 59: 1190–1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tang J, Zhu Z, Xia S, Li N, Chen N, Gao Q, Li L, Zhou X, Li D, Zhu X, Tu Q, Li W, Wu C, Li J, Zhong Y, Li X, Mao C, Xu Z. Chronic hypoxia in pregnancy affected vascular tone of renal interlobar arteries in the offspring. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 9723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kandiel MM, Watanabe G, Sosa GA, Abou El-Roos ME, Abdel-Ghaffar AE, Li JY, Manabe N, El Azab AS, Taya K. Profiles of circulating steroid hormones, gonadotropins, immunoreactive inhibin and prolactin during pregnancy in goats and immunolocalization of inhibin subunits, steroidogenic enzymes and prolactin in the corpus luteum and placenta. J Reprod Dev 2010; 56: 243–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pepe GJ, Lynch TJ, Albrecht ED. Regulation of baboon fetal ovarian development by placental estrogen: onset of puberty is delayed in offspring deprived of estrogen in utero. Biol Reprod 2013; 89: 132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.van Marthens E, Zamenhof S, Firestone C. The effect of progesterone on fetal and placental development in normal and protein-energy-restricted rats. Nutr Metab 1979; 23: 438–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Serón-Ferré M, Torres-Farfán C, Forcelledo ML, Valenzuela GJ. The development of circadian rhythms in the fetus and neonate. Semin Perinatol 2001; 25: 363–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stark RI, Garland M, Daniel SS, Tropper P, Myers MM. Diurnal rhythms of fetal and maternal heart rate in the baboon. Early Hum Dev 1999; 55: 195–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Houghton DC, Young IR, McMillen IC. Evidence for hypothalamic control of the diurnal rhythms in prolactin and melatonin in the fetal sheep during late gestation. Endocrinology 1995; 136: 218–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Reproduction and Development are provided here courtesy of The Society for Reproduction and Development

RESOURCES