Skip to main content
Autophagy logoLink to Autophagy
editorial
. 2016 Jul 20;12(9):1429–1430. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1203489

Alternative autophagy, brefeldin A and viral trafficking pathways

Charles Grose a,, Daniel J Klionsky b
PMCID: PMC5082769  PMID: 27439673

ABSTRACT

Two topics that have attracted recent attention in the field of autophagy concern the source of the membrane that is used to form the autophagosome during macroautophagy and the role of noncanonical autophagic pathways. The 2 topics may converge when considering the intersection of autophagy with viral infection. We suggest that noncanonical autophagy, which is sensitive to treatment with brefeldin A, may converge with the infectious cycles of certain DNA and RNA viruses that utilize membrane from the ER and cis-Golgi.

KEYWORDS: autophagy, Beclin 1, brefeldin A, coronavirus, Ebola virus, herpesvirus


Alternative macroautophagy/autophagy is being reported in an increasing number of papers since it was first described.1-3 Two forms of alternative autophagy are called (i) noncanonical BECN1-independent autophagy and (ii) ATG5- and ATG7-independent autophagy. In canonical autophagy, autophagosome biogenesis is initiated at the ER-derived omegasome and/or via a phagophore, although the precise mechanism has not been defined and the source of the membrane donor is the cause of an ongoing debate. Evidence points to the Golgi apparatus as an important membrane source for autophagosome formation. One distinctive feature common to both forms of alternative autophagy, however, is its inhibition by the 16-carbon lactone brefeldin A (BFA), which exerts its disruptive effect at the cis-Golgi, further demarcating a contribution of the Golgi with regard to autophagosome biogenesis;4,5 in prior studies, canonical autophagy was not inhibited by BFA treatment.6,7

The ATG5- and ATG7-independent but BECN1-dependent autophagy pathway was first documented in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) that lack ATG5.2 Treatment with the stressor etoposide leads to equal numbers of autophagosomes per cell in ATG5+ and ATG5 MEFs. Furthermore, treatment of both ATG5+ and ATG5 MEFs with 3-methyladenine suppresses autophagosome formation. However, examination of the autophagosomes in the ATG5 cells disclosed an absence of LC3-II modification. Furthermore, treatment with BFA inhibits autophagy in the ATG5 cells but not in the ATG5+ cells. Similar results are obtained in ATG7 MEFs.

The noncanonical BECN1-independent autophagy pathway is stimulated by the monounsaturated fatty acid oleate.8 The original study compared autophagy induction by oleate to that which occurs in response to the saturated fatty acid palmitate. Depletion of ATG5 and ATG7 inhibits autophagic induction by both fatty acids. However, autophagic induction by oleate does not require BECN1. As with the ATG5- and ATG7-independent pathway, treatment with BFA inhibits oleate-induced noncanonical autophagy. Note that a BECN1-independent type of autophagy was previously reported in response to mitochondrial damage, but the sensitivity to BFA was not determined.1

As described above, a feature common to both forms of alternative autophagy is inhibition by BFA. BFA was first characterized in 1968 during a survey of antiviral activity of compounds extracted from the fungus Penicillium brefeldianum. BFA inhibits 2 different viruses, including a DNA virus, herpes simplex virus, and a RNA virus, Newcastle disease virus (similar to mumps virus). BFA was subsequently determined to inhibit a subset of GTP-exchange factors that catalyze the activation of a small GTPase called ARF1, a member of the RAS superfamily, which is responsible for the recruitment of coat proteins for vesicular trafficking between the ER and Golgi.5

Virologists have used BFA extensively for decades because the compound can inhibit entry of some viruses and egress of others. The entry of human papillomavirus and polyomavirus is blocked by BFA treatment, whereas the number of cytoplasmic replication compartments of coronavirus is reduced by BFA.9,10 Likewise the egress of enveloped viruses, such as herpes viruses and paramyxoviruses (Newcastle disease virus), is blocked by BFA.4 The mechanism of the original 1968 antiviral observation has been revealed: Biosynthesis of viral glycoproteins of enveloped viruses requires their transfer from the ER to the cis-Golgi during processing of their glycans, a step inhibited by BFA, before envelopment and final egress of a mature viral particle.11 Ebola virus, an enveloped RNA virus, also appears to fall into the latter category.12

Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites that appropriate (or hijack) cellular organelles and trafficking pathways during their infectious cycles. The numerous roles of canonical autophagy during viral infectious cycles have been reviewed.13,14 As is apparent from the above discussion, multiple disparate viruses require components within the region of the ER/cis-Golgi during their infectious cycle, the same region disrupted by treatment with BFA. Not only does this region overlap with the site of autophagosome formation during alternative autophagy, but this region may correspond to one of the membrane donors for canonical autophagy; for example, in vitro evidence suggests a role for the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment,15 while genetic data support the involvement of the conserved oligomeric Golgi complex16 in the latter pathway.

The RNA and DNA viruses that utilize this region proceed toward a productive infection, whereas the alternative autophagy pathway proceeds toward eventual formation of an autolysosome with degradation of its contents. Although there is no evidence that this site of geographical intersection between alternative autophagy and viral trafficking pathways predicts any other commonality between the 2 processes, we do not yet know whether viral infection may interfere with alternative autophagy within an infected cell, whether some viruses rely on noncanonical autophagic pathways for replication, or whether alternative autophagic pathways may play a role in some antimicrobial responses. Thus, researchers studying viral trafficking pathways following entry or during egress will need to consider potential consequences of intersections with both canonical and alternative autophagy pathways.

Abbreviations

ARF1

ADP ribosylation factor 1

ATG

autophagy related

BECN1

Beclin 1

BFA

brefeldin A

ER

endoplasmic reticulum

GTP

guanosine triphosphate

LC3

microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3

MEF

mouse embryo fibroblast

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Funding

This work was supported by NIH grants AI089716 to CG and GM053396 to DJK.

References

  • [1].Zhu JH, Horbinski C, Guo F, Watkins S, Uchiyama Y, Chu CT. Regulation of autophagy by extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases during 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced cell death. Am J Pathol 2007; 170:75-86; PMID:17200184; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Nishida Y, Arakawa S, Fujitani K, Yamaguchi H, Mizuta T, Kanaseki T, Komatsu M, Otsu K, Tsujimoto Y, Shimizu S. Discovery of Atg5/Atg7-independent alternative macroautophagy. Nature 2009; 461:654-8; PMID:19794493; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature08455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Klionsky DJ, Lane JD. Alternative macroautophagy. Autophagy 2010; 6:201; PMID:20083899; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/auto.6.2.11151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Tamura G, Ando K, Suzuki S, Takatsuki A, Arima K. Antiviral activity of brefeldin A and verrucarin A. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1968; 21:160-1; PMID:4299889; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.7164/antibiotics.21.160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Zeghouf M, Guibert B, Zeeh JC, Cherfils J. Arf, Sec7 and Brefeldin A: a model towards the therapeutic inhibition of guanine nucleotide-exchange factors. Biochem Soc Trans 2005; 33:1265-8; PMID:16246094; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1042/BST0331265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Purhonen P, Pursiainen K, Reunanen H. Effects of brefeldin A on autophagy in cultured rat fibroblasts. Eur J Cell Biol 1997; 74:63-7; PMID:9309391 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Ding WX, Ni HM, Gao W, Hou YF, Melan MA, Chen X, Stolz DB, Shao ZM, Yin XM. Differential effects of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced autophagy on cell survival. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:4702-10; PMID:17135238; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M609267200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Niso-Santano M, Malik SA, Pietrocola F, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Marino G, Cianfanelli V, Ben-Younès A, Troncoso R, Markaki M, Sica V, et al.. Unsaturated fatty acids induce non-canonical autophagy. EMBO J 2015; 34:1025-41; PMID:25586377; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.15252/embj.201489363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Laniosz V, Dabydeen SA, Havens MA, Meneses PI. Human papillomavirus type 16 infection of human keratinocytes requires clathrin and caveolin-1 and is brefeldin a sensitive. J Virol 2009; 83:8221-32; PMID:19494002; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/JVI.00576-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Verheije MH, Raaben M, Mari M, Te Lintelo EG, Reggiori F, van Kuppeveld FJ, Rottier PJ, de Haan CA. Mouse hepatitis coronavirus RNA replication depends on GBF1-mediated ARF1 activation. PLoS Pathog 2008; 4:e1000088; PMID:18551169; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Whealy ME, Card JP, Meade RP, Robbins AK, Enquist LW. Effect of brefeldin A on alphaherpesvirus membrane protein glycosylation and virus egress. J Virol 1991; 65:1066-81; PMID:1847436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Yamayoshi S, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y. Role of the GTPase Rab1b in ebolavirus particle formation. J Virol 2010; 84:4816-20; PMID:20164217; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/JVI.00010-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Jackson WT. Viruses and the autophagy pathway. Virology 2015; 479–480:450-6; PMID:25858140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Grose C, Buckingham EM, Jackson W, Carpenter JE. The pros and cons of autophagic flux among herpesviruses. Autophagy 2015; 11:716-7; PMID:25905782; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/15548627.2015.1017223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Ge L, Melville D, Zhang M, Schekman R. The ER-Golgi intermediate compartment is a key membrane source for the LC3 lipidation step of autophagosome biogenesis. Elife 2013; 2:e00947; PMID:23930225; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.7554/eLife.00947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Yen W-L, Shintani T, Nair U, Cao Y, Richardson BC, Li Z, Hughson FM, Baba M, Klionsky DJ. The conserved oligomeric Golgi complex is involved in double-membrane vesicle formation during autophagy. J Cell Biol 2010; 188:101-14; PMID:20065092; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1083/jcb.200904075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Autophagy are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES