Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 14;8(10):638. doi: 10.3390/nu8100638

Table 4.

Variety of items consumed from each food group and dietitians rating of diet and nutrition knowledge based on gender and reason for requesting assistance.

Variety of Items from Each Food Group & TOTAL Median (Range) Gender Median (Range) Reason for Consultation Median (Range)
Female (n = 18) Male (n = 26) Making Weight or Weight Loss (n = 26) Weight Gain (n = 4) Performance (n = 9) Clinical # (n = 5)
Grains 2 (0–6) 2 (0–5) 2 (0–6) 2 (0–5) 2.5 (2–5) 3 (1–6) 2 (0–3)
Vegetables 2 (0–9) 2 (0–9) 2 (0–8) 2 (0–9) 4 (2–8) 4 (0–5) 2 (0–8)
Fruit * 3 (0–8) 3 (0–8) 1.5 (0–4) 2 (0–7) 1.5 (0–2) 2 (0–8) 4 (3–7)
Dairy 1 (0–2) 1 (0–2) 1 (0–2) 1 (0–2) 1 (1–2) 1 (0–2) 1 (0–2)
Meats 2 (0–7) 2 (0–6) 2 (0–7) 2 (0–7) 2.5 (2–4) 3 (1–6) 2 (1–2)
Discretionary ^ 3 (0–7) 3 (1–7) 3 (0–6) 3 (0–7) 4.5 (3–6) 2 (0–6) 3 (1–3)
TOTAL 15 (4–49) 16.5 (7–29) 13.5 (4–24) 13 (4–21) 15 .5 (14–24) 16 (8–29) 15 (9–22)

# Clinical consultations included coeliac disease, corn allergy, nut allergy, and reflux; ^ Discretionary foods included: cakes/biscuits/muffin/pastries, pizza, coco-pops™, soft drinks, ice cream, desserts, and chocolate spread; * Significant difference in fruit variety between genders (Mann–Whitney U test p = 0.001) and reason for consultation (Kruskal–Wallis test, p = 0.038).