Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated low‐dose human recombinant erythropoietin (rhEPO) in the improvement of neurological outcomes in very preterm infants.
Methods
A total of 800 infants of ≤32‐week gestational age who had been in an intensive care unit within 72 hours after birth were included in the trial between January 2009 and June 2013. Preterm infants were randomly assigned to receive rhEPO (500IU/kg; n = 366) or placebo (n = 377) intravenously within 72 hours after birth and then once every other day for 2 weeks. The primary outcome was death or moderate to severe neurological disability assessed at 18 months of corrected age.
Results
Death and moderate/severe neurological disability occurred in 91 of 338 very preterm infants (26.9%) in the placebo group and in 43 of 330 very preterm infants (13.0%) in the rhEPO treatment group (relative risk [RR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.27–0.59, p < 0.001) at 18 months of corrected age. The rate of moderate/severe neurological disability in the rhEPO group (22 of 309, 7.1%) was significantly lower compared to the placebo group (57 of 304, 18.8%; RR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.19–0.55, p < 0.001), and no excess adverse events were observed.
Interpretation
Repeated low‐dose rhEPO treatment reduced the risk of long‐term neurological disability in very preterm infants with no obvious adverse effects. Ann Neurol 2016;80:24–34
Preterm and very preterm births have increased globally, and the survival rate of very preterm infants has increased with the progress of prenatal and neonatal intensive care. 1 However, very preterm infants have a high risk of severe short‐term complications such as intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and long‐term neurodevelopmental disorders such as cerebral palsy, intellectual disabilities, and hearing and vision impairment,2, 3 and prematurity is still a leading cause of neonatal death. Although active perinatal care has improved neurodevelopmental outcomes in extremely preterm infants, the most extremely preterm infants continue to have high rates of neurological disabilities.3, 4 These neurological disabilities are still a significant burden on families and society, and the current therapy for preterm brain injury is mainly supportive and seeks to maintain physiological parameters. There is, therefore, a pressing need for interventions to prevent injury or enhance injury repair and to improve long‐term neurological outcome.5
Erythropoietin (EPO) was first recognized for its hematopoietic properties; recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) has been used to treat a number of anemic states, including early and late anemia of prematurity, and it has been found to be safe and to reduce the need for blood transfusions.6 EPO produced in the central nervous system7 is upregulated after insult and plays a role in neuroprotection.8, 9, 10, 11 Experimental studies have reported that rhEPO possesses neuroprotective properties in different neonatal brain injury animal models,12, 13 and clinical studies have shown that rhEPO treatment reduces brain injury and the incidence of neurological disabilities in infants.8, 14, 15, 16, 17 In addition, improved neurodevelopmental outcomes have been observed in preterm infants with anemia after rhEPO treatment.17, 18, 19, 20 The neuroprotective effect of rhEPO was suggested to be through acting against apoptosis, inflammation, and neurotoxicity and by acting as an antioxidant in protecting white matter from injury and in promoting neural regeneration, injury repair, and normal development.5
It has been shown that serum rhEPO concentrations are positively correlated with the degree of maturation during mental development in preterm infants,21 and high‐dose rhEPO (2,500U/kg) is well tolerated by preterm infants, causing no excess morbidity or mortality.14, 20 However, it is still a significant concern to use high‐dose rhEPO in very preterm infants because this might increase the potential risk of ROP.19, 22, 23 Based on previously observed neurodevelopmental improvement in very preterm infants who received low‐dose rhEPO treatment for anemia prevention—and our own previous study, where repeated low‐dose rhEPO (300–500U/kg) treatment of hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy in term infants improved long‐term neurological outcomes—we tested the hypothesis that early repeated low‐dose rhEPO (500U/kg) treatment started within 72 hours after birth and then once every other day for 2 weeks will reduce early severe complications and improve long‐term neurological outcomes in very preterm infants. This study provides important evidence that early repeated low‐dose rhEPO treatment improves long‐term neurological outcomes in very preterm infants and without obvious adverse effects.
Subjects and Methods
Patient Population
Between January 2009 and June 2013, a total of 800 preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Zhengzhou Children's Hospital within 72 hours after birth and with gestational age ≤ 32 weeks were deemed eligible for the study. The sample size was determined based on the assumption that 30% of the selected preterm infants would develop adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in the control group at 18 months of corrected age.24 If the relative risk (RR) were to be reduced by 40% with rhEPO treatment, then 363 patients would need to be recruited for each group for a significance level of 5% with 95% power and 10% loss to follow‐up. Infants with genetic metabolic diseases, congenital abnormalities, polycythemia, severe infection (infection‐induced multiple organ failure), unstable vital signs (multiple organ failure such as respiration or circulation failure), or grade III/IV intracranial hemorrhage before randomization were excluded from the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents, and the infants were assigned randomly to rhEPO treatment or placebo. This study was approved by the Life Science Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University and Henan Medical Academy in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02036073).
Study Design and Treatment Procedures
For infants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, their mothers' complete obstetric histories were obtained, including chorioamnionitis, maternal hypertension, premature rupture of membrane, and mode of delivery. A simple randomization plan was established in the Department of Medical Documentation of each center before the start of the trial. Each patient was randomly assigned to rhEPO or placebo in a 1:1 allocation using a computer‐based random‐number generator. The resulting group assignment for each consecutive patient was concealed in sealed envelopes before the patients' inclusion. In the rhEPO treatment group, patients were given rhEPO at 500U/kg intravenously every other day for 2 weeks (a cumulative dose of 3,500U/kg over the course of 7 separate intravenous injections regardless of gestational age), starting with the first dose within 72 hours after birth. Patients in the placebo group received an equivalent volume of saline with the same treatment procedure as the rhEPO group. The supportive care, including keeping warm, parenteral nutrition, feeding, and other treatments according to different clinical symptoms were identical between the two treatment groups. Blood transfusion criteria followed strict clinical criteria.25
Discontinuation was defined as infants who were lost to follow‐up, who did not complete the treatment, or who suffered serious side effects. Criteria for withholding or stopping the study drug included major venous thrombosis, polycythemia (hematocrit > 60% or hematocrit increase ≥ 15% not due to transfusion), hypertension (systemic blood pressure >95mmHg at 0–7 days of age, > 100mmHg at 8–14 days, or >105mmHg at over 2 weeks), and unexpected death (not caused by defined disorders acquired in the neonatal period due to prematurity).
Data Collection
Blood pressure and body weight of the very preterm infants were recorded daily for the first 2 weeks of life. In addition, weekly complete blood cell counts and the number and volume of blood transfusions during hospitalization were recorded. Routine blood tests were obtained before and after rhEPO treatment. Renal and liver function tests were obtained weekly. If infants had blood transfusions, blood samples were collected at least 3 days after that. Head ultrasound was performed on all patients within 3 days after birth and then weekly until discharge (at least 4 sessions of ultrasonography were performed, which depended on the gestational age), and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at 40 weeks of corrected age to determine the presence and extent of brain injury, hemorrhage, or thrombosis.26 Data regarding complications of prematurity, including ICH, PVL, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), sepsis, and ROP, were recorded.
ICH was classified as grade I to IV according to Papile et al.27 PVL, including cystic PVL and diffuse PVL, was diagnosed by ultrasound and MRI.28, 29 BPD was determined by an oxygen reduction test at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age, and the severity was further judged using criteria adapted from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.30 NEC was determined by symptoms and x‐ray examination and classified according to Berman and Moss.31 ROP screening was performed in accordance with Chinese guidelines with both eyes examined by an experienced ophthalmologist. The severity of ROP was graded according to the international classification of ROP.32
Outcome Measures
All surviving infants were regularly evaluated every 3 months through a standardized nervous system examination, and a final examination at 18 months of corrected age was performed to evaluate motor functions and mental developmental index (MDI) using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (2nd edition). Hearing status was determined from parental reports and supplemented with auditory brainstem response measurements. Deafness was defined as a hearing disability that required amplification.33 Blindness was defined as a corrected visual acuity of <20/200.33 Moderate or severe disabilities were defined as survival with at least 1 of the following complications: cerebral palsy, MDI < 70, deafness, or blindness.
In this study, the investigators enrolled the participants. The investigators performing the short‐term and long‐term outcome assessments and the parents were blinded to the patients' group allocation, although the doctors and nurses responsible for treatment were not blinded according to the rules of medical procedure in China. The final evaluation at 18 months of corrected age was performed by doctors from the Child Growth and Development Department, who were blinded to the treatment protocol and not allowed to have access to the treatment history of the infants.
Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY). Quantitative data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The gestational age, birth weight, blood cell counts, alanine aminotransferase level, serum creatinine level, and numbers of blood transfusions between the two groups were compared using Student t test. The differences between the two groups for sex ratio, obstetric history, asphyxia, and surfactant administration were compared using the chi‐square test. Neonatal complications and outcomes at 18 months of corrected age between the two groups were compared using the univariate logistic regression test. Interaction analysis in subgroups was performed with Mantel–Haenszel tests. Risk factors of adverse neurological outcome were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The level of statistical significance was set at 2‐sided α = 0.05.
Results
Baseline Characteristics and Follow‐up
A total of 800 very preterm infants of ≤32 weeks of gestational age were admitted to the NICU during the observation period (Fig 1). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups (Table 1).
Figure 1.
Study flow. Schematic flowchart shows the numbers of infants who were screened for eligibility, randomly assigned to recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) or placebo groups, and followed up to 18 months of corrected age. Lost to follow‐up means that contact with the family was lost during the follow‐up period. ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; NEC = necrotizing enterocolitis.
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo, n = 377 | rhEPO, n = 366 | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age, wk | 30.40 ± 1.46 | 30.39 ± 1.38 | 0.906 |
| Birth weight, g | 1,396 ± 239 | 1,372 ± 209 | 0.153 |
| Male, No. (%) | 261 (69.2) | 251 (68.6) | 0.848 |
| Female, No. (%) | 116 (30.8) | 115 (31.4) | 0.848 |
| Premature rupture of membrane, No. (%) | 63 (16.7) | 79 (21.6) | 0.081 |
| Maternal hypertension, No. (%) | 53 (14.1) | 62 (16.9) | 0.255 |
| Twins/multiple births, No. (%) | 46 (12.2) | 32 (8.7) | 0.115 |
| Caesarean section, No. (%) | 205 (54.3) | 198 (54.1) | 0.972 |
| 1‐minute Apgar < 3′, No. (%) | 9 (2.4) | 8 (2.2) | 0.990 |
| 5‐minute Apgar < 7′, No. (%) | 6 (1.6) | 5 (1.4) | 0.811 |
| Surfactant administration, No. (%) | 229 (60.7) | 227 (62.0) | 0.700 |
| Mechanical ventilation > 7 days, No. (%) | 28 (7.4) | 19 (5.2) | 0.224 |
Probability value is for placebo group versus recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) group using Student t test or chi‐square test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Neurological Outcomes at 18 Months of Corrected Age
For analysis of long‐term outcomes, there were 613 of 668 surviving very preterm infants who completed the follow‐up at 18 months of corrected age, including 304 in the placebo group and 309 in the rhEPO group (see Fig). Regarding the primary outcomes, death or moderate/severe neurological disability occurred in 91 of the 338 very preterm infants (26.9%) in the placebo group and in 43 of the 330 very preterm infants (13.0%) in the rhEPO treatment group (RR = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.27–0.59, p < 0.001; Table 2) at 18 months of corrected age. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the two groups (p = 0.077).
Table 2.
Outcomes at 18 Months of Corrected Age
| Outcome | Placebo | rhEPO | Relative Risk [95% CI] | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary outcomes | ||||
| Death, No. (%) | 34/338 (10.1) | 21/330 (6.4) | 0.60 [0.34–1.06] | 0.077 |
| Disability, No. (%) | 57/304 (18.8) | 22/309 (7.1) | 0.32 [0.19–0.55] | <0.001a |
| Death + disability, No. (%) | 91/338 (26.9) | 43/330 (13.0) | 0.40 [0.27–0.59] | <0.001a |
| Secondary outcomes | ||||
| Cerebral palsy, No. (%) | 16/304 (5.3) | 7/309 (2.3) | 0.43 [0.17–1.06] | 0.065 |
| MDI < 70, No. (%) | 49/304 (16.1) | 19/309 (6.1) | 0.33 [0.19–0.58] | <0.001a |
| Deafness, No. (%) | 8/304 (2.6) | 1/309 (0.3) | 0.12 [0.02–0.99] | 0.019a |
| Blindness, No. (%) | 3/304 (1.0) | 2/309 (0.6) | 0.67 [0.11–4.04] | 0.662 |
Probability value is for placebo group versus rhEPO group using univariate logistic regression. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Disability indicates the incidence of moderate or severe disability, which is defined as survival with at least 1 of the following complications: cerebral palsy, MDI < 70, deafness, or blindness.
Statistically significant.
CI = confidence interval; MDI = mental developmental index; rhEPO = recombinant human erythropoietin.
The total number of patients with moderate or severe neurological disability at 18 months of corrected age was 57 (57 of 304, 18.8%) infants from the placebo group and 22 (22 of 309, 7.1%) infants from the rhEPO treatment group (RR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.19–0.55, p < 0.001; see Table 2). The median MDI value was significantly lower in the placebo group (90.00, range = 63–106) compared to the rhEPO group (100.00, range = 68–117; p < 0.001). The median psychomotor development index value was significantly lower in the placebo group (90.00, range = 62–109) compared to the rhEPO group (99.00, range = 66–112; p < 0.001). The incidence of MDI < 70 was 16.1% in the infants from the placebo group (84.1 ± 12.1, median = 90.0, range = 63.0–106.0) versus 6.1% in the infants from the rhEPO treatment group (95.2 ± 12.5, median = 100, range = 68–117; RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.19–0.58, p < 0.001). The incidence of deafness was significantly lower in infants from the rhEPO group compared to infants in the placebo group (0.3% vs 2.6%, respectively; RR = 0.12, 95% CI =0.02–0.99, p = 0.019). The incidences of cerebral palsy (p = 0.065) and blindness (p = 0.662) were similar between infants from the rhEPO treatment and the placebo group (see Table 2).
Subgroup analyses were performed based on gestational age (<28 weeks, 28–296/7 weeks, 30–32 weeks), birth weight (<1,000g, 1,000–1,499g, ≥1,500g), and sex. Moderate or severe disability, including MDI < 70 at 18 months of corrected age, was associated with gestational age and birth weight (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively; Table 3). rhEPO treatment significantly reduced the incidence of moderate or severe disability, including MDI < 70 in the gestational age 28–296/7 weeks and 30–32 weeks groups, in the birth weight 1,000–1,499g group, and in boys (p < 0.01; see Table 3). There was no significant interaction between rhEPO and any subgroup in preterm infants with disability at 18 months of corrected age (Table 4).
Table 3.
Outcomes at 18 Months of Corrected Age in Subgroups
| Characteristic | CP, No. (%) | MDI < 70, No. (%) | Blindness, No. (%) | Deafness, No. (%) | Disability, No. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age | |||||
| <28 weeks | |||||
| Total, n = 25 | 5 (20) | 10 (40) | 4 (16) | 0 | 12 (48) |
| Placebo, n = 13 | 3 (23) | 6 (46) | 2 (15.4) | 0 | 6 (46.2) |
| rhEPO, n = 12 | 2 (16.7) | 4 (33.3) | 2 (16.7) | 0 | 6 (50) |
| 28–296/7 weeks | |||||
| Total, n = 172 | 10 (5.8) | 20 (11.6) | 1 (0.6) | 4 (2.3) | 26 (15.1) |
| Placebo, n = 77 | 7 (9.1) | 15 (19.5) | 1 (1.3) | 3 (3.9) | 20 (26) |
| rhEPO, n = 95 | 3 (3.2) | 5 (5.3)a | 0 | 1 (1.1) | 6 (6.3)a |
| 30–32 weeks | |||||
| Total, n = 416 | 8 (1.9)b | 38 (9.1)b | 0 | 5 (1.2) | 41 (9.9)b |
| Placebo, n = 214 | 6 (2.8) | 28 (13.1) | 0 | 5 (2.3) | 31 (14.5) |
| rhEPO, n = 202 | 2 (1) | 10 (5)a | 0 | 0 | 10 (5)a |
| Birth weight | |||||
| <1,000g | |||||
| Total, n = 27 | 2 (7.4) | 6 (22.2) | 2 (7.4) | 0 | 7 (25.9) |
| Placebo, n = 14 | 2 (14.3) | 5 (35.7) | 1 (7.1) | 0 | 5 (35.7) |
| rhEPO, n = 13 | 0 | 1 (7.7) | 1 (7.7) | 0 | 2 (15.4) |
| 1,000–1,499g | |||||
| Total, n = 363 | 17 (4.7) | 49 (13.5) | 3 (0.8) | 9 (2.5) | 59 (16.3) |
| Placebo, n = 172 | 11 (6.4) | 34 (19.8) | 2 (1.2) | 8 (4.7) | 42 (24.4) |
| rhEPO, n = 191 | 6 (3.1) | 15 (7.9)a | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5)c | 17 (8.9)a |
| ≥1,500g | |||||
| Total, n = 213 | 4 (1.9) | 13 (6.1)d | 0 | 0 | 13 (6.1)b |
| Placebo, n = 118 | 3 (2.5) | 10 (8.5) | 0 | 0 | 10 (8.5) |
| rhEPO, n = 105 | 1 (1) | 3 (2.9) | 0 | 0 | 3 (2.9) |
| Sex | |||||
| Boys | |||||
| Total, n = 428 | 16 (3.7) | 49 (11.4) | 4 (0.9) | 7 (1.6) | 60 (14.0) |
| Placebo, n = 216 | 10 (4.6) | 36 (16.7) | 2 (0.9) | 7 (3.2) | 44 (20.3) |
| rhEPO, n = 212 | 6 (2.8) | 13 (6.1)a | 2 (0.9) | 1 (0.5)c | 16 (7.5)a |
| Girls | |||||
| Total, n = 185 | 7 (3.8) | 19 (10.2) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 19 (10.3) |
| Placebo, n = 88 | 6 (6.8) | 13 (14.8) | 1 (1.1) | 1 (1.1) | 13 (14.8) |
| rhEPO, n = 97 | 1 (1.0) | 6 (6.2) | 0 | 0 | 6 (6.2) |
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
p < 0.01, placebo group versus rhEPO group using Fisher exact test in each stratum.
p < 0.01, comparing poor outcome with gestational age, birth weight, and sex using Fisher exact test.
p < 0.05, placebo group versus rhEPO group using Fisher exact test in each stratum.
p < 0.05, comparing poor outcome with gestational age, birth weight, and sex using Fisher exact test.
CP = cerebral palsy; rhEPO = recombinant human erythropoietin.
Table 4.
Subgroup Interaction Analyses in Preterm Infants with Disability at 18 Months of Corrected Age
| Subgroup | rhEPO, n = 22, No. (%) | Placebo, n = 57, No. (%) | Relative Risk [95% CI] | Interaction p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Boys | 16/212 (7.5) | 44/216 (20.4) | 0.31 [0.17–0.57] | |
| Girls | 6/97 (6.2) | 13/88 (14.8) | 0.37 [0.14–1.03] | |
| Total | 0.32 [0.19–0.55] | 0.76 | ||
| Gestational age | ||||
| <28 weeks | 6/12 (50) | 6/13 (46.2) | 1.17 [0.24–5.62] | |
| 28–296/7 weeks | 6/95 (6.3) | 20/77 (26) | 0.19 [0.07–0.51] | |
| 30–32 weeks | 10/202 (5) | 31/214 (14.5) | 0.30 [0.14–0.63] | |
| Total | 0.32 [0.19–0.55] | 0.15 | ||
| Birth weight | ||||
| <1,000g | 2/13 (15.4) | 5/14 (35.7) | 0.33 [0.05–2.11] | |
| 1,000–1,499g | 17/191 (8.9) | 42/172 (24.4) | 0.30 [0.17–0.56] | |
| ≥1,500g | 3/105 (2.9) | 10/118 (8.5) | 0.29 [0.08–1.10] | |
| Total | 0.32 [0.19–0.54] | 0.99 |
Probability value is for interaction analysis in subgroups using the Mantel–Haenszel test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
CI = confidence interval; rhEPO = recombinant human erythropoietin.
Multivariate Analysis for Adverse Neurological Outcome
Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for moderate/severe neurological disability at 18 months of corrected age was performed using 16 items, including gestation, birth weight, sex, severe asphyxia, ventilation > 7 days, severe anemia, PVL, ICH III–IV, sepsis, BPD, NEC, cholestasis syndrome, respiratory distress syndrome, EPO treatment, pneumonia, and persistent hypoglycemia. We found that PVL, ICH III–IV, ventilation > 7 days, and gestation age of 28–296/7 weeks were risk factors for poor neurological outcome. EPO treatment was a protective factor against adverse neurological outcome (Table 5).
Table 5.
Logistic Regression Analysis of Risk Factors for Adverse Neurological Outcome
| 95% CI Exp (B) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | B | SE | Wald | df | p | Exp (B) | Lower | Upper |
| Ventilation > 7 days | 3.079 | 1.126 | 7.481 | 1 | 0.006a | 21.728 | 2.393 | 197.286 |
| PVL | 2.205 | 0.746 | 8.729 | 1 | 0.003a | 9.073 | 2.101 | 39.184 |
| ICH, III–IV | 3.990 | 1.331 | 8.993 | 1 | 0.003a | 54.062 | 3.984 | 733.596 |
| rhEPO | −1.385 | 0.606 | 5.219 | 1 | 0.022a | 0.250 | 0.076 | 0.821 |
| Gestational age | ||||||||
| <28 weeks | 6.137 | 2 | 0.046a | |||||
| 28–296/7 weeks | 2.334 | 0.943 | 6.119 | 1 | 0.013a | 10.315 | 1.624 | 65.529 |
| Constant | −3.564 | 1.181 | 9.110 | 1 | 0.003a | 0.028 | ||
CI = confidence interval; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; PVL = periventricular leukomalacia; rhEPO = recombinant human erythropoietin; SE = standard error; Wald = Wald test.
Statistically significant.
Neonatal Complications
The incidence of PVL and grade III–IV ICH in the infants from the rhEPO treatment group was significantly lower compared to the infants from the placebo treatment group (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.35–0.79, p = 0.002 and RR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.23–0.62, p < 0.001, respectively; Table 6). Similarly, the occurrence of NEC and sepsis was significantly lower in the rhEPO‐treated infants than in the placebo treatment group (RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.27–0.73, p = 0.001 and RR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.46–0.92, p = 0.015, respectively). Further analysis showed the rate of NEC stage I (RR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.22–0.68, p = 0.001), but not stage II (RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.13–1.44, p = 0.165) or III (RR = 1.52, 95% CI = 0.25–9.13, p = 0.685), was significantly decreased in the rhEPO group. The occurrence of ROP did not show significant differences between the two groups of infants (p = 0.196), and there were no significant differences in the occurrence of BPD between the two groups of infants (p = 0.168; see Table 6).
Table 6.
Neonatal Complications and rhEPO Treatment
| Complication | Placebo, n = 377, No. (%) | rhEPO, n = 366, No. (%) | Relative Risk [95% CI] | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICH, III‐IV | 60 (15.9) | 24 (6.6) | 0.38 [0.23–0.62] | <0.001 |
| PVL | 74 (19.6) | 41 (11.2) | 0.52 [0.35–0.79] | 0.002 |
| ROP | 97 (25.7) | 79 (21.6) | 0.80 [0.57–1.12] | 0.196 |
| NEC | 54 (14.3) | 25 (6.8) | 0.44 [0.27–0.73] | 0.001 |
| BPD | 51 (13.5) | 37 (10.1) | 0.73 [0.46–1.14] | 0.168 |
| Sepsis | 99 (26.3) | 71 (19.4) | 0.65 [0.46–0.92] | 0.015 |
Probability value is for the placebo group versus rhEPO group using univariate logistic regression. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
BPD = bronchopulmonary dysplasia; CI = confidence interval; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; NEC = necrotizing enterocolitis; PVL = periventricular leukomalacia; rhEPO = recombinant human erythropoietin; ROP = retinopathy of prematurity.
Safety Analysis
The red blood cell counts (p = 0.567), hemoglobin levels (p = 0.849), hematocrit (p = 0.725), and blood platelet counts (p = 0.309) were similar between the two groups of infants before rhEPO treatment (Table 7). At 2 weeks after treatment, there were significantly higher red blood cell counts (p = 0.001), hemoglobin levels (p < 0.001), and hematocrit (p = 0.004) in the rhEPO‐treated infants compared to the infants who received placebo. The total number of blood transfusions was significantly decreased in the rhEPO‐treated infants compared to the infants in the placebo group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences regarding the blood platelet count, alanine aminotransferase levels, or serum creatinine levels between the infants in the two treatment groups (see Table 7). No other obvious side effects such as thrombosis, hypertension, polycythemia, or polyplastocytosis were observed in the rhEPO treatment group or the placebo group.
Table 7.
Blood Analysis before and after Treatment during Hospitalization
| Blood Analysis | Placebo, n = 377 | rhEPO, n = 366 | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | |||
| RBC, 1012/l | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 3.8 ± 0.6 | 0.567 |
| Hemoglobin, g/l | 139 ± 29 | 140 ± 28 | 0.849 |
| Hematocrit, % | 42.3 ± 9.1 | 42.8 ± 8.7 | 0.725 |
| Platelet, 109/l | 236 ± 113 | 247 ± 110 | 0.309 |
| ALT | 7.6 ± 5.3 | 7.8 ± 3.5 | 0.299 |
| SCR | 62.3 ± 33.1 | 53.5 ± 22.3 | 0.195 |
| After treatment | |||
| RBC, 1012/l | 2.9 ± 0.6 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 0.001 |
| Hemoglobin, g/l | 98 ± 18 | 109 ± 15 | <0.001 |
| Hematocrit, % | 28.6 ± 6.3 | 33.3 ± 4.6 | 0.004 |
| Platelet, 109/l | 267 ± 126 | 270 ± 111 | 0.823 |
| ALT | 11.5 ± 5.1 | 9.8 ± 8.2 | 0.428 |
| SCR | 41.5 ± 10.5 | 37.2 ± 14.8 | 0.522 |
| Transfusions | 2.2 ± 1.7 | 1.1 ± 1.2 | <0.001 |
Probability value is for the erythropoietin group versus the control group using Student t test. p < 0.05 means a significant difference.
ALT = alanine aminotransferase; RBC = red blood cell; rhEPO = recombinant human erythropoietin; SCR = serum creatinine.
Discussion
Very preterm infants are at high risk for brain injury and subsequent neurodevelopmental disabilities such as cerebral palsy and neurocognitive deficits, and there are no widely accepted preventive or therapeutic strategies for preterm brain injury and neurological sequelae. Recent experimental34, 35 and clinical17, 36, 37, 38 studies indicate that rhEPO is a promising candidate for very preterm infants with brain injury and that it improves neurodevelopment and reduces the risk of neurodevelopmental disability. However, the safe dose range, timing, and duration of rhEPO administration still require careful exploration and consideration. In this study, we found that repeated administration of low‐dose rhEPO (500U/kg) for 2 weeks significantly reduced the incidence of brain injuries, including ICH and PVL. This suggests that rhEPO treatment confers short‐term neuroprotection in very preterm infants. In addition, the incidence of neurological disabilities was significantly reduced after rhEPO treatment. This rhEPO treatment protocol did not increase the incidence of ROP, and no adverse side effects were observed. Overall, our study demonstrated that repeated low‐dose rhEPO affords both short‐term and long‐term neuroprotection and suggests that rhEPO is a promising preventive and therapeutic option for very preterm infants. The subgroup analysis showed that rhEPO improved long‐term outcomes for very preterm infants of different gestational ages, birth weights, and sex. In this study, we also observed that the incidence of neurological disabilities was associated with gestational age and birth weight. The earlier the preterm birth, or the lower the birth body weight, the higher the chances of suffering from neurological disability, and this is in agreement with previous findings.39
The current study has some limitations. First, the number of subjects lost to follow‐up was relatively high. This was probably related to the high cost of hospitalization and lack of health insurance or poor prognosis. The migration of some families might be another important reason, because many young people frequently change their work in China. Second, although the rate of enrollment was highly dependent on the parents' understanding and trust in the intervention, the number of the very preterm infants in the gestational age < 28 weeks subgroup and the birth weight < 1,000g subgroup was low, and this might be why we did not observe any difference between rhEPO and vehicle‐treated very preterm infants in these subgroups. In addition, we would likely need more infants in the birth weight ≥ 1,500g subgroup to see a significant difference because the incidence of neurological disabilities decreases with increasing birth weight. Third, there were more boys than girls in this study, and such an imbalance in sex ratio has been reported in other studies in Chinese populations.40 Male preterm infants have a higher risk of abnormal neurological outcome than female preterm infants,41 and more boys in the current study might have influenced the incidence of neurological disability and the effects of rhEPO treatment. Fourth, a subsequent follow‐up for 5 years42 or until the children start school43 might further help determine whether early administration of rhEPO to very preterm infants improves neurodevelopmental outcomes.rhEPO was originally used at a low dose to prevent anemia in preterm infants, and it is now widely accepted as a routine application for all preterm infants as a substitute for blood transfusion, although the dose, duration, and route of rhEPO administration has been modified and is different from its original usage.23, 25, 44 Animal experiments showed that high‐dose rhEPO (10,000–30,000U/kg) decreases both short‐term and long‐term brain injury, but it must be given at the time of, or very soon after, brain injury.12, 45 This high‐dose rhEPO in rodents was equivalent to that in preterm infants given at a high dose of 1,000 to 2,500U/kg.20 Based on those results from neonatal rodent brain injury models, clinical studies showed that high‐dose rhEPO (2,500–3,000U/kg) administered after birth was well tolerated in preterm and term infants14, 20, 33, 37, 42 and conferred neuroprotection.16, 36 In a previous study using low‐dose rhEPO to prevent anemia in preterm infants, it was observed that preterm infants with rhEPO treatment also had significant neurodevelopmental improvement.38 Another previous study using low‐dose rhEPO (250–400U/kg, 3 times a week for 6 weeks) to prevent anemia in premature infants of birth weight < 1,500g found that the neurodevelopmental outcome improvement was related to the total cumulative dose of rhEPO,46 suggesting that repeated low‐dose rhEPO treatment could be beneficial. Repeated administration of as low as 500U/kg of rhEPO for 2 weeks in the present study proved to be neuroprotective.
With the increasing number of premature infants, rhEPO is increasingly being used in neonatal medicine as a substitute for blood transfusions in preterm infants. The side effects of rhEPO in very preterm infants have drawn much concern, especially because rhEPO has been reported to promote angiogenesis and ROP.47 However, studies in the current literature show conflicting results with regard to ROP being associated with the use of rhEPO in preterm infants.17, 20, 22, 23, 48 In a recent review of 27 studies with a total of 2,209 preterm infants, early administration of rhEPO reduced the risk associated with increased blood transfusion, but there was a tendency, although not significant, for an increase in the risk of ROP. The rates for mortality and morbidities, including ICH and NEC, were not significantly changed by early rhEPO treatment.23 Other recent studies showed that early high‐dose rhEPO (2,500–3,000U/kg) administered once in very preterm infants did not increase the incidence or severity of ROP.20, 37 In the current study, low‐dose rhEPO (500U/kg) treatment decreased the risk of NEC and sepsis and did not increase the risk of ROP or BPD. The mechanisms behind the reduced incidence of NEC and sepsis are not fully understood; however, rhEPO protects epithelial barrier function and protects intestine from excessive autophagy and apoptosis, and this, as well as rhEPO's immunomodulation actions, might provide beneficial effects in preventing NEC and sepsis.49, 50 Furthermore, there were no adverse effects such as thrombosis, hypertension, polycythemia, or polyplastocytosis observed, which is in line with previous reports,20, 37 suggesting that the current protocol of repeated low‐dose rhEPO treatment in this study is protective and safe.
In summary, this study provides important evidence for a safe and beneficial effect of rhEPO on improving the short‐term and long‐term outcomes in very preterm infants who received repeated low doses of rhEPO. No signs of adverse effects of this early rhEPO treatment in very preterm infants were identified. We speculate, therefore, that rhEPO treatment could be an important preventive and therapeutic option for very preterm infants with brain injury. Future research on the neuroprotective effect of rhEPO will focus on very preterm infants of gestational age < 28 weeks by increasing the sample size and prolonging the treatment time up to 32 weeks collective age. A subsequent follow‐up to 5 years will be performed in the future to determine whether early administration of rhEPO to very preterm infants improves neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Author Contributions
J.S. and H.S. contributed equally to this work. Concept and study design: C.Z., X.W., H.S., and J.S. Data acquisition and analysis: all authors. Drafting the manuscript and the figures: J.S., C.Z., H.S., and X.W.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Nothing to report.
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by the Department of Health of Henan Province (201201002); the Department of Science and Technology of Henan Province (134200510023); the Science and Technology Bureau of Zhengzhou (131PCXTD621), China; the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271152, C.Z.); the Swedish Research Council (521‐2011‐2855, 2015‐02845, C.Z.; 2013‐2475, X.W.); government of Sweden grants to scientists working in health care (ALFGBG‐429271, C.Z.; ALFGBG‐429801, X.W.); and the VINNMER–Marie Curie international qualification (2011–03458, X.W.; 2015‐04780, C.Z.).
We thank the parents for allowing their very preterm infants to take part in this study; and the Research Centers of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Zhengzhou Children's Hospital for their assistance.
References
- 1. Kinney MV, Lawn JE, Howson CP, Belizan J. 15 Million preterm births annually: what has changed this year? Reprod Health 2012;9:28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet 2012;379:2151–2161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Serenius F, Kallen K, Blennow M, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely preterm infants at 2.5 years after active perinatal care in Sweden. JAMA 2013;309:1810–1820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Wilson‐Costello DE, et al. Early‐childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes are not improving for infants born at <25 weeks' gestational age. Pediatrics 2011;127:62–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Juul SE, Ferriero DM. Pharmacologic neuroprotective strategies in neonatal brain injury. Clin Perinatol 2014;41:119–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Maier RF, Obladen M, Muller‐Hansen I, et al. Early treatment with erythropoietin beta ameliorates anemia and reduces transfusion requirements in infants with birth weights below 1000 g. J Pediatr 2002;141:8–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Sargin D, El‐Kordi A, Agarwal A, et al. Expression of constitutively active erythropoietin receptor in pyramidal neurons of cortex and hippocampus boosts higher cognitive functions in mice. BMC Biol 2011;9:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zhu C, Kang W, Xu F, et al. Erythropoietin improved neurologic outcomes in newborns with hypoxic‐ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics 2009;124:e218–e226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Traudt CM, McPherson RJ, Bauer LA, et al. Concurrent erythropoietin and hypothermia treatment improve outcomes in a term nonhuman primate model of perinatal asphyxia. Dev Neurosci 2013;35:491–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hellstrom‐Westas L, Rosen I. Continuous brain‐function monitoring: state of the art in clinical practice. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;11:503–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Siren AL, Knerlich F, Poser W, et al. Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor in human ischemic/hypoxic brain. Acta Neuropathol 2001;101:271–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wang X, Zhu C, Wang X, et al. The nonerythropoietic asialoerythropoietin protects against neonatal hypoxia‐ischemia as potently as erythropoietin. J Neurochem 2004;91:900–910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Leist M, Ghezzi P, Grasso G, et al. Derivatives of erythropoietin that are tissue protective but not erythropoietic. Science 2004;305:239–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wu YW, Bauer LA, Ballard RA, et al. Erythropoietin for neuroprotection in neonatal encephalopathy: safety and pharmacokinetics. Pediatrics 2012;130:683–691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Elmahdy H, El‐Mashad AR, El‐Bahrawy H, et al. Human recombinant erythropoietin in asphyxia neonatorum: pilot trial. Pediatrics 2010;125:e1135–e1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Leuchter RH, Gui L, Poncet A, et al. Association between early administration of high‐dose erythropoietin in preterm infants and brain MRI abnormality at term‐equivalent age. JAMA 2014;312:817–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Neubauer AP, Voss W, Wachtendorf M, Jungmann T. Erythropoietin improves neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely preterm infants. Ann Neurol 2010;67:657–666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rosebraugh MR, Widness JA, Nalbant D, et al. Pharmacodynamically optimized erythropoietin treatment combined with phlebotomy reduction predicted to eliminate blood transfusions in selected preterm infants. Pediatr Res 2014;75:336–342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Aher SM, Ohlsson A. Early versus late erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;10:CD004865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Juul SE, McPherson RJ, Bauer LA, et al. A phase I/II trial of high‐dose erythropoietin in extremely low birth weight infants: pharmacokinetics and safety. Pediatrics 2008;122:383–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Bierer R, Peceny MC, Hartenberger CH, Ohls RK. Erythropoietin concentrations and neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2006;118:e635–e640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kandasamy Y, Kumar P, Hartley L. The effect of erythropoietin on the severity of retinopathy of prematurity. Eye 2014;28:814–818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ohlsson A, Aher SM. Early erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;4:CD004863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ballot DE, Potterton J, Chirwa T, et al. Developmental outcome of very low birth weight infants in a developing country. BMC Pediatr 2012;12:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Vazquez Lopez MA, Llamas MA, Galera R, et al. Comparison between one and three doses a week of recombinant erythropoietin in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 2011;31:118–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Song J, Xu F, Wang L, et al. Early amplitude‐integrated electroencephalography predicts brain injury and neurological outcome in very preterm infants. Sci Rep 2015;5:13810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr 1978;92:529–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. de Vries LS, Eken P, Dubowitz LM. The spectrum of leukomalacia using cranial ultrasound. Behav Brain Res 1992;49:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Smyser CD, Snyder AZ, Shimony JS, et al. Effects of white matter injury on resting state fMRI measures in prematurely born infants. PLoS One 2013;8:e68098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ehrenkranz RA, Walsh MC, Vohr BR, et al. Validation of the National Institutes of Health consensus definition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics 2005;116:1353–1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Berman L, Moss RL. Necrotizing enterocolitis: an update. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;16:145–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Yu XD, Branch DW, Karumanchi SA, Zhang J. Preeclampsia and retinopathy of prematurity in preterm births. Pediatrics 2012;130:e101–e107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. McAdams RM, McPherson RJ, Mayock DE, Juul SE. Outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants given early high‐dose erythropoietin. J Perinatol 2013;33:226–230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Fan X, Heijnen CJ, van der KM, et al. Beneficial effect of erythropoietin on sensorimotor function and white matter after hypoxia‐ischemia in neonatal mice. Pediatr Res 2011;69:56–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Liu W, Shen Y, Plane JM, et al. Neuroprotective potential of erythropoietin and its derivative carbamylated erythropoietin in periventricular leukomalacia. Exp Neurol 2011;230:227–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. O'Gorman RL, Bucher HU, Held U, et al. Tract‐based spatial statistics to assess the neuroprotective effect of early erythropoietin on white matter development in preterm infants. Brain 2015;138(pt 2):388–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Fauchere JC, Dame C, Vonthein R, et al. An approach to using recombinant erythropoietin for neuroprotection in very preterm infants. Pediatrics 2008;122:375–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ohls RK, Kamath‐Rayne BD, Christensen RD, et al. Cognitive outcomes of preterm infants randomized to darbepoetin, erythropoietin, or placebo. Pediatrics 2014;133:1023–1030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Larroque B, Ancel PY, Marret S, et al. Neurodevelopmental disabilities and special care of 5‐year‐old children born before 33 weeks of gestation (the EPIPAGE study): a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet 2008;371:813–820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Xia L, Sun L, Wang X, et al. Changes in the incidence of congenital anomalies in Henan Province, China, from 1997 to 2011. PLoS One 2015;10:e0131874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Peacock JL, Marston L, Marlow N, et al. Neonatal and infant outcome in boys and girls born very prematurely. Pediatr Res 2012;71:305–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Fauchere JC, Koller BM, Tschopp A, et al. Safety of early high‐dose recombinant erythropoietin for neuroprotection in very preterm infants. J Pediatr 2015;167:52–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Marlow N, Morris T, Brocklehurst P, et al. A randomised trial of granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor for neonatal sepsis: childhood outcomes at 5 years. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015;100:F320–F326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Ohls RK, Roohi M, Peceny HM, et al. A randomized, masked study of weekly erythropoietin dosing in preterm infants. J Pediatr 2012;160:790–795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kellert BA, McPherson RJ, Juul SE. A comparison of high‐dose recombinant erythropoietin treatment regimens in brain‐injured neonatal rats. Pediatr Res 2007;61:451–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Brown MS, Eichorst D, Lala‐Black B, Gonzalez R. Higher cumulative doses of erythropoietin and developmental outcomes in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2009;124:e681–e687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Watanabe D, Suzuma K, Matsui S, et al. Erythropoietin as a retinal angiogenic factor in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med 2005;353:782–792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Schneider JK, Gardner DK, Cordero L. Use of recombinant human erythropoietin and risk of severe retinopathy in extremely low‐birth‐weight infants. Pharmacotherapy 2008;28:1335–1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Shiou SR, Yu Y, Chen S, et al. Erythropoietin protects intestinal epithelial barrier function and lowers the incidence of experimental neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. J Biol Chem 2011;286:12123–12132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Vollmar B, Eipel C, Menger MD. Therapeutic effects of erythropoietin in murine models of endotoxin shock. Crit Care Med 2010;38:340–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]