Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Oct 31;6:36132. doi: 10.1038/srep36132

A dual specificity kinase, DYRK1A, as a potential therapeutic target for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Aneesha Radhakrishnan 1,2, Vishalakshi Nanjappa 1,3, Remya Raja 1, Gajanan Sathe 1,4, Vinuth N Puttamallesh 1,3, Ankit P Jain 1,5, Sneha M Pinto 1, Sai A Balaji 6, Sandip Chavan 1,4, Nandini A Sahasrabuddhe 1, Premendu P Mathur 2,5, Mahesh M Kumar 7, T S Keshava Prasad 1,3,8, Vani Santosh 9, Geethanjali Sukumar 1, Joseph A Califano 10,11, Annapoorni Rangarajan 6, David Sidransky 11, Akhilesh Pandey 12,13,14,15, Harsha Gowda 1,8,a, Aditi Chatterjee 1,8,b
PMCID: PMC5086852  PMID: 27796319

Abstract

Despite advances in clinical management, 5-year survival rate in patients with late-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has not improved significantly over the past decade. Targeted therapies have emerged as one of the most promising approaches to treat several malignancies. Though tyrosine phosphorylation accounts for a minority of total phosphorylation, it is critical for activation of signaling pathways and plays a significant role in driving cancers. To identify activated tyrosine kinase signaling pathways in HNSCC, we compared the phosphotyrosine profiles of a panel of HNSCC cell lines to a normal oral keratinocyte cell line. Dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) was one of the kinases hyperphosphorylated at Tyr-321 in all HNSCC cell lines. Inhibition of DYRK1A resulted in an increased apoptosis and decrease in invasion and colony formation ability of HNSCC cell lines. Further, administration of the small molecular inhibitor against DYRK1A in mice bearing HNSCC xenograft tumors induced regression of tumor growth. Immunohistochemical labeling of DYRK1A in primary tumor tissues using tissue microarrays revealed strong to moderate staining of DYRK1A in 97.5% (39/40) of HNSCC tissues analyzed. Taken together our results suggest that DYRK1A could be a novel therapeutic target in HNSCC.

Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) is a common malignancy worldwide arising from various regions of upper-aero digestive tract and oral cavity. It is the sixth most common cancer worldwide1. Approximately more than 500,000 new cases and 12,000 deaths are estimated annually in United States for head and neck cancer2. The major risk factors in HNSCC include smoking, alcohol consumption and human papillomavirus (HPV) infections. Despite all the treatment strategies, therapeutic resistance/failure and tumor recurrence still exists making the five-year survival rate, sub-optimal3. Hence it is important to understand the molecular events associated with HNSCC for the identification of novel therapeutic targets.

Protein kinases are the key regulators of signal transduction pathways in many cellular processes. Aberrant activation of kinase driven pathways has been reported to play a crucial role in multiple cellular processes that leads to cancer progression. Such alterations can be assessed by studying the proteome through analysis of the phosphoproteome. In recent years, kinases have become one of the most intensively studied groups of proteins as drug targets. To date, 28 small molecule kinase inhibitors have been approved by FDA for cancer therapy4. Identification of imatinib, a small molecule inhibitor against BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, by Druker and colleagues revolutionized the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia5,6. Although targeted therapy using EGFR specific antibody cetuximab, is used in the treatment of HNSCC; non-responsiveness and development of resistance is a common hindrance7. Protein kinases not only play a central role in cell signaling networks but also serve as excellent therapeutic targets. Phosphoproteome profiling to identify activated kinase pathways is an established approach to identify novel therapeutic targets in cancer8. To achieve this, we studied the activation of signaling molecules in a panel of HNSCC cell lines and a normal oral keratinocyte cell line (OKF6/TERT1) using phosphoproteomics approach. We identified a total of 38 proteins which included multiple kinases which were found to be differentially phosphorylated in all the HNSCC cell lines compared to the normal oral keratinocyte cell line, OKF6/TERT1. Dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) was one of the identified kinases which showed hyperphosphorylation (fold change ≥1.5) in all the 6 HNSCC cell lines compared to normal oral keratinocytes.

DYRK1A belongs to dual specificity tyrosine (Y) phosphorylation regulated kinase (DYRK) family which is known to be activated through autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the activation loop and phosphorylates their substrates on serine and threonine residues9. Other members of this family include DYRK1B, DYRK2, DYRK3, DYRK4A and DYRK4B. Studies have revealed that DYRK family kinases play an important role in regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis10,11. DYRK1A has been reported to be strongly expressed in the brain and known to regulate various functions in brain12. However, studies by other groups have reported overexpression of DYRK1A, and its closest member DYRK1B, in various tumors including glioblastoma, ovarian cancer, lung cancer, colon cancer and pancreatic cancer13,14,15,16,17 suggesting a role of this molecule in tumorigenesis. A study by Pozo et al., showed that inhibition of DYRK1A stimulated EGFR degradation and reduced EGFR-dependent tumor growth in glioblastoma13. DYRK1A plays an important role in cell survival by phosphorylating caspase 9 at Thr-125 and inhibiting its action in apoptosis11. Taken together these studies indicate that DYRK1A plays a significant role in mediating survival of cancer cells. Although the role of DYRK1A in cancers has been characterized, its role in HNSCC is not defined. In this study, we have assessed the role of DYRK1A as a potential therapeutic target in HNSCC.

Results

Quantitative phosphotyrosine analysis of HNSCC

We employed tandem mass tag (TMT)-based labeling technology coupled with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody-based enrichment approach to identify differentially phosphorylated proteins between normal oral keratinocyte OKF6/TERT1, and a panel of HNSCC cell lines (JHU-O11, JHU-O22, JHU-O28, JHU-O29, FaDu and CAL 27) (Supplementary Fig. 1). We identified a total of 51 phosphosites in 38 proteins in the HNSCC cells compared to OKF6/TERT1. Amongst the hyperphosphorylated proteins, we identified molecules including protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 11 (PTPN11), myelin protein zero-like 1 (MPZL1) and tyrosine kinases such as LYN proto-oncogene (LYN), EPH receptor A2 (EPHA2) and DYRK1A. The overexpression of PTPN11, LYN and EPHA2 has been reported in head and neck cancer18,19,20. Tyr-321 is the known activation site of DYRK1A21. We identified hyperphosphorylation of DYRK1A at Tyr-321 in all HNSCC cell lines. As expected, protein phosphorylation pattern was heterogeneous across HNSCC cell lines (Table 1). Western blot analysis revealed overexpression of DYRK1A in HNSCC cell lines compared to OKF6/TERT1 (Fig. 1a).

Table 1. A partial list of hyperphosphorylated proteins in at least four cell lines.

Gene Symbol Phosphopeptide Sequence Protein Description PhosphoSite (Protein) JHU-O28/OKF6/TERT1 JHU-O11/OKF6/TERT1 FaDu/OKF6/TERT1 CAL 27/OKF6/TERT1 JHU-O22/OKF6/TERT1 JHU-O29/OKF6/TERT1
CDK1 IGEGtyGVVYK Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 T14; Y15 26.6 8.4 11.8 8.3 16.3 13.2
CAV1 YVDSEGHLyTVPIR Caveolin-1 Y14 1.2 1.7 2.9 3.7 1.1 1.8
LYN VIEDNEYtAR Tyrosine-protein kinase Lyn T377 1.8 2.6 9.7 6.6 4.4 6.9
EGFR GSTAENAEyLR Epidermal growth factor receptor Y1197 1.0 1.6 5.7 19.9 3.7 7.1
MPZL1 SESVVyADIR Myelin protein zero like protein 1 Y113 6.4 1.5 3.2 2.1 1.1 4.1
EPHA2 TYVDPHTyEDPNQAVLK Ephrin type-A receptor 2 Y594 6.7 5.1 3.2 6.7 4.3 7.3
PTPN11 GHEyTNIK Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 11 Y542 2.9 1.4 2.3 3.1 2.5 2.8
DYRK1A IYQyIQSR Dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A Y321 1.8 2.7 3.8 2.1 2.9 3.8
CTNND1 SLDNNySTPNER Catenin delta-1 Y797 0.2 1.2 4.3 3.6 1.7 7.0
ANXA2 SYSPyDMLESIR Annexin A2 Y238 0.6 1.6 7.7 0.9 1.8 3.2
Open in a new tab

Figure 1. Inhibition of DYRK1A reduces cellular proliferation in HNSCC.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Western blot analysis shows the expression profile of DYRK1A in a panel of HNSCC cell lines – JHU-O11, JHU-O22, JHU-O28, JHU-O29, FaDu and CAL 27 compared to normal oral keratinocytes OKF6/TERT1. (b) Immunohistochemical validation of DYRK1A in HNSCC tissue - representative sections from normal and HNSCC cases were stained with anti-DYRK1A antibody. (c) Western blot analysis depicting DYRK1A expression in HNSCC cell lines upon transfection with DYRK1A siRNA. β-actin was used as a loading control. (d) Cellular proliferation of HNSCC cells upon siRNA mediated silencing of DYRK1A (*p < 0.05).

Immunohistochemical validation of DYRK1A in HNSCC tissue

Our western blot results revealed overexpression of DYRK1A in HNSCC cell lines. We checked the expression of DYRK1A in primary HNSCC tissues. Tissue microarray-based immunohistochemical validation was carried out using 40 HNSCC tissues. A variable staining pattern was noted across cases of HNSCC. 97.5% (39 of 40) of HNSCC cases showed moderate to strong staining (1+ to 2+) while 2.5% (1 of 40) of the cases showed negative staining. A Chi-square test clearly indicated a significant overexpression of DYRK1A in HNSCC cases (p-value = 0.0076). The results of the immunohistochemical validation are provided in Table 2. The representative staining patterns for DYRK1A in HNSCC and adjacent normal tissues are illustrated in Fig. 1b.

Table 2. Summary of the immunohistochemical validation of DYRK1A in HNSCC and normal tissues.

Staining Intensity Tumor cases Normal cases
Strong 25 1
Moderate 14 5
Negative 1 2
p-value of significant difference between tumor and normal groups (Chi-square test) 0.0076
Open in a new tab

Inhibition of DYRK1A reduces cellular proliferation in HNSCC

Since DYRK1A was found to be overexpressed in all the HNSCC cell lines, we next studied the role of DYRK1A in cell proliferation. Cellular proliferation for the panel of HNSCC cell lines was studied after silencing of endogenous expression of DYRK1A using its specific siRNA. Western blot analysis confirmed efficient knockdown of DYRK1A in all HNSCC cells (Fig. 1c). We further assessed the effect of DYRK1A silencing on cell proliferation of HNSCC cell lines. A decrease in cellular proliferation of HNSCC cells was observed upon silencing of DYRK1A (Fig. 1d). Akin to siRNA results, inhibition of DYRK1A using its specific inhibitor harmine22 also led to decrease in the cellular proliferation of majority of the HNSCC cells (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Inhibition of DYRK1A reduces the colony forming ability of HNSCC cells

Having observed that DYRK1A plays an essential role in cellular proliferation, we next studied the role of DYRK1A in the colony forming ability of the HNSCC cells. siRNA mediated silencing of DYRK1A resulted in a decrease in the colony forming ability of the HNSCC cells (Fig. 2a,b). In concordance with the siRNA results, inhibition of DYRK1A using harmine in HNSCC cell lines resulted in a significant decrease in the colony formation ability of the cells (Fig. 2c,d).

Figure 2. Inhibition of DYRK1A affects the colony forming ability of the HNSCC cells.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Colony formation assay following siRNA mediated knockdown of DYRK1A or control siRNA in a panel of HNSCC cell lines, as indicated. Colonies formed were visualized after staining with methylene blue. (b) A graphical representation of the colony forming ability of the HNSCC cells upon DYRK1A silencing (*p < 0.05). (c) Colony forming ability of the HNSCC cells upon inhibition of DYRK1A using harmine or control (DMSO), in the indicated panel of HNSCC cells. (d) A graphical representation of the colony forming ability of HNSCC cells upon harmine treatment (*p < 0.05). Representative images were photographed at a magnification (2.5x).

Inhibition of DYRK1A reduces the invasive ability of the HNSCC cells

Since inhibition of DYRK1A led to a decrease in the colony formation ability of the HNSCC cell lines, we next studied if DYRK1A has a potential role in HNSCC invasiveness. We investigated the in vitro invasive capabilities of the HNSCC cells using Matrigel invasion assay. siRNA mediated silencing of DYRK1A, showed decrease in invasive property of all the HNSCC cells (Fig. 3a,b). In agreement with the siRNA results, inhibition of DYRK1A with harmine, resulted in a significant decrease in the invasive property of all the HNSCC cells (Fig. 3c,d). Taken together, our results indicate that DYRK1A may play an essential role in HNSCC metastasis.

Figure 3. Inhibition of DYRK1A reduces the invasive ability of the HNSCC cells.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) HNSCC cells were transfected with DYRK1A specific siRNA and/or scramble siRNA and invasion assays were carried out using in a transwell system using Matrigel-coated filters and the number of cells that migrated to the lower chamber was counted. Cells that migrated are visualized following methylene blue staining in a panel of HNSCC cell lines as indicated and invaded cells were photographed. (b) Graphical representation of invasive ability of HNSCC cells upon DYRK1A silencing (*p < 0.05). (c) HNSCC cells were treated with DYRK1A inhibitor (harmine) or vehicle control (DMSO) and invaded cells were photographed. (d) Graphical representation of invasive ability of DYRK1A upon inhibition with harmine (*p < 0.05). Representative images were photographed at a magnification (10x).

Inhibition of DYRK1A suppresses tumor growth in vivo

Having observed DYRK1A affects both HNSCC cellular proliferation and invasive potential in vitro, we next studied the oncogenic potential of DYRK1A by targeting DYRK1A in vivo. Athymic nude mice were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) with CAL 27 cells. At day 7, when the tumors reached the size of approximately 50 mm3, mice were randomized into two groups of five animals each and treated with either vehicle alone (DMSO) or harmine (15 mg/kg/injection, every 3 days till 3 weeks) intraperitoneally (i.p.). Tumor size was measured every 3 days and the mean tumor volume was calculated. We observed significant differences in tumor growth between vehicle control and harmine treated group over a 25-day experimental period (Fig. 4a). The mice were sacrificed at the end of 25 days and tumors extracted from harmine treated group had significant lower tumor mass compared to vehicle group (Fig. 4b,c). Further we examined the expression of proliferation marker, Ki67 in xenograft sections using immunofluorescence. The data revealed a decrease in expression of Ki67 in harmine treated xenograft tissue compared to vehicle treated tissue (Fig. 4d).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Inhibition of DYRK1A suppresses tumor growth in vivo (a) CAL 27 (2 × 106) cells were injected into the flanks of female nude mice (n = 10) and tumor growth kinetics is represented for a period of 25 days. *p = 0.02 (b) Representative pictures of tumors from vehicle and harmine treated groups. (c) Bar graph representing the tumor weights (**p < 0.05). (d) Expression of Ki67 (Alexa Fluor 594) in xenograft tissue sections was determined by immunofluorescence. Cell nuclei were stained blue with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI).

Inhibition of DYRK1A induces apoptosis in vitro and in vivo

Next we studied the role of inhibition DYRK1A in apoptosis in HNSCC cells. CAL 27 and JHU – O28 were treated with harmine or DMSO (control) and apoptosis was determined by staining cells using annexin V fluorescein isothiocyanate and propidium iodide (PI). Harmine treatment induced 14.8% late apoptosis (both annexin V and PI positive) in CAL 27 cells, with 6.0% of cells undergoing early apoptosis (annexin V positive and PI negative), compared to 3.7% late apoptotic cells and 1.7% of early apoptotic cells in the control (DMSO treated) cells (Fig. 5a). In JHU-O28 cells harmine treatment induced 10.8% and 1.7% of late and early apoptosis respectively compared to 5.5% and 1.1% late and early apoptotic cells respectively in the control (DMSO) treated cells (Fig. 5b). In addition, we examined the expression of pro and anti-apoptotic proteins upon inhibition of DYRK1A in CAL 27 and JHU-O28 cells. Western blot analyses revealed a decrease in BCL-xL and an increased expression of BAX upon inhibition of DYRK1A with harmine (Fig. 5c). Treatment with harmine also resulted in the activation of CASP9 (Caspase-9) and PARP (Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase) in both CAL 27 and JHU-O28 cells (Fig. 5c). Further we studied the expression of pro and anti-apoptotic proteins in the xenograft tissue treated with either vehicle control (DMSO) or harmine. Western blot analysis revealed a decrease in the expression of both BCL-xL and BCL2 and an increased expression of pro-apoptotic protein BAX (Fig. 5d). In vivo treatment with harmine also promoted the activation of CASP9, CASP3 (Caspase 3) and PARP indicating induction of apoptosis (Fig. 5d). These results indicate that inhibition of DYRK1A leads to induction of apoptosis in HNSCC cells.

Figure 5. Inhibition of DYRK1A induces apoptosis in vitro and in vivo.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Apoptosis was measured in CAL 27 (a) and JHU-O28 (b) cells using Annexin V/PI staining. (c) Western blot analysis was carried out for the indicated proteins using CAL 27 and JHU-O28 cells treated with harmine or DMSO (control). β-actin was used as a loading control. (d) Western blot analysis was carried out using cellular lysates of xenograft tissue (Harmine and DMSO treated) for the indicated proteins. β-actin was used as a loading control.

Inhibition of DYRK1A leads to activation of FOXO3A in HNSCC

Since our in vitro and in vivo results showed that DYRK1A plays an essential role in the oncogenic potential of HNSCC, we sought to study the signaling mechanisms of DYRK1A in HNSCC. Previous studies have shown activation of AKT and MAPKs in the brain of DYRK1A-overexpressing mice23. It has also been reported that DYRK1A phosphorylates forkhead transcription factors and mediates cell survival24,25. FOXO3A is a known substrate of AKT and MAPK and studies have shown that phosphorylation of FOXO3A by AKT and MAPKs are inhibitory and helps in the survival of cancer cells26,27. Inhibition of DYRK1A using harmine decreased p-AKT levels without affecting the total AKT levels in three of the HNSCC cell lines studied (Fig. 6a,b). As AKT is reported to phosphorylate FOXO3A on Ser25328, we examined the effect of DYRK1A-AKT pathway on FOXO3A phosphorylation. Inhibition of DYRK1A decreased phosphorylation of FOXO3A on Ser253 in all HNSCC cell lines (Fig. 6a,b). Western blot analysis of the xenograft tissue (treated with harmine) also showed a decreased expression of p-AKT and p-FOXO3A (Fig. 6b). We further analysed the levels of p-AKT (Ser473) and p-FOXO3A (Ser253) in CAL 27 cell line treated with DYRK1A siRNA. We observed a decreased phosphorylation of both p-AKT (Ser473) and p-FOXO3A (Ser253) in the siRNA treated cells (Fig. 6c). These results indicate that DYRK1A inhibition leads to activation of FOXO3A (decrease in phosphorylation) in HNSCC cells.

Figure 6. Inhibition of DYRK1A leads to activation of FOXO3A in HNSCC.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

HNSCC cell lines JHU-O28, FaDu, JHU-O11, JHU-O29 (a) and CAL 27 (b) were treated with DYRK1A inhibitor harmine. Immunoblot analysis of p-AKT (Ser473), Total AKT, p-FOXO3A (Ser253) and Total FOXO3A was performed. β-actin was used as loading control. (b) Western blot analysis was performed using cellular lysates from xenograft tissue (Harmine and DMSO treated) for AKT (Ser473), Total AKT, p-FOXO3A (Ser253) and Total FOXO3A. (c) CAL 27 cells were treated with DYRK1A siRNA or control siRNA and Western blot analysis was carried for the indicated proteins.

Discussion

We and others have demonstrated that phosphoproteomics is an effective technique to study aberrantly activated kinase signaling pathways in multiple malignancies8,29,30. There is substantial literature indicating that protein kinases are most frequently involved in tumorigenesis31. It is now well established that most cancers are heterogeneous and that specific kinases are hyperactive in at least a subset of a given cancers and drive their progression. Studies by us and others suggest that these activated kinases can serve as both surrogate markers for monitoring responses and also serve as potential therapeutic targets32,33.

To identify novel therapeutic targets in HNSCC, we studied the phosphotyrosine signaling in a panel of HNSCC cell lines and normal oral keratinocyte cell line OKF6/TERT1. This led to the identification of hyperphosphorylated kinases such as YES proto-oncogene 1, Src family tyrosine kinase (YES1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), LYN proto-oncogene (LYN), EPH receptor A2 (EPHA2) and DYRK1A in the HNSCC cell lines. DYRK1A is a member of the conserved family of DYRKs that autophosphorylate tyrosine in their activation loop34. Depending upon the cellular context, DYRK1A is known to function both as a tumor suppressor and an oncogene35. Recent studies have indicated the role of DYRKs in regulation of mitotic transition and apoptosis induced by DNA damage36. Various members of DYRK family have been reported to play key role in cell proliferation and survival in cancer cell lines. Pharmacological inhibition of DYRK1A in mouse xenograft based studies has demonstrated it as a potential target in Glioblastoma13. DYRK1A has been shown to play role in quiescence by the assembly of DREAM complex and inhibits cell proliferation37. Our data illustrates the role of DYRK1A in both proliferation and metastatic potential in HNSCC. Silencing and/or inhibition of DYRK1A using siRNA or inhibitor (harmine) showed an increased apoptosis with significant reduction in cellular proliferation, invasion and colony forming ability of the HNSCC cells. We observed a significant decrease in tumor load in mouse xenografts upon DYRK1A inhibition. Our immunohistochemical studies indicate strong to moderate expression of DYRK1A in 97.5% of HNSCC primary tissue. These results suggest that DYRK1A has the potential to become a novel therapeutic target for HNSCC.

It has been reported that DYRK1A activates PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways in conditions such as hyperhomocystenimia23, however the connecting link between these major signaling pathways and DYRK1A remains unclear in cancer. It has been reported that FOXO transcription factors can be targeted by DYRK kinases24. FOXO transcription factors are known to play a role in regulating genes responsible for apoptosis and cell cycle progression38. They are mainly regulated by phosphorylation, acetylation and ubiquitination. Previous studies have shown that phosphorylation of FOXO3A by AKT and MAPK1/2 promotes cellular survival26,27. We studied the effect of DYRK1A inhibition in HNSCC cell lines. Our study demonstrates that inhibition of DYRK1A led to cell death via decrease in phosphorylation of FOXO3A which is both dependent and independent on AKT signaling in HNSCC cells. Taken together our data suggest the role of DYRK1A signaling in promoting cellular survival in HNSCC.

In summary this study shows that DYRK1A was hyperphosphorylated and overexpressed in HNSCC cells. We showed a decrease in oncogenic characteristics including proliferation, invasion and migration of cells by inhibition of DYRK1A using in vitro assays. Inhibition of DYRK1A in vivo also resulted in a reduction in tumor growth. Our results indicate that DYRK1A plays a crucial role in regulating major signaling pathways in HNSCC. These results suggest that DYRK1A plays an important role in carcinogenesis and can serve as a potential therapeutic target in HNSCC. Future investigations in larger patient cohorts are required to confirm our findings in clinical settings. Our work provides a scaffold for future studies to systematically investigate the role of DYRK1A in HNSCC.

Methods

Cell culture

FaDu and CAL 27 were purchased from ATCC. Normal oral keratinocyte OKF6/TERT1 was a gift from Dr. James Rheinwald at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, MA. JHU-O11, JHU-O22, JHU-O28, JHU-O29 and FaDu were cultured in RPM1-1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. CAL 27 cells were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. OKF6/TERT1 was cultured and maintained in KSFM (keratinocyte-serum free media) (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with bovine pituitary extract (25 mg/ml), calcium chloride (0.4 mM), epidermal growth factor (0.2 ng/ml) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. All cell lines were grown in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The cell lines used for the study were authenticated by short tandem repeat analysis at the Genetic Resources Core Facility of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Sample Preparation for LC-MS/MS analysis

Protein isolation and digestion

Each cell line was grown to 70% confluence and then maintained in serum free medium for 12 h before the cells were harvested for protein isolation. The cells were lysed in lysis buffer (2% SDS, 5mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1mM sodium orthovanadate in 50mM Triethyl ammonium bicarbonate (TEABC)). Protein concentration was estimated using BCA (Pierce, Waltham, MA) assays. Equal amount of protein from each cell line was used for protein digestion. We employed filter aided sample preparation (FASP) protocol using 30kDa filters to reduce the amount of SDS in the lysate39. The protein sample was reduced and alkylated as described previously40. Trypsin digestion was carried using TPCK treated trypsin (1: 20) for 12–16 h at 37 °C.

TMT labeling and phosphopeptide enrichment

Peptide samples were labeled using TMT 10 plex reagents (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) as described previously41. Peptides derived from all OKF6/TERT1 were labeled with TMT tag 127N, JHU-O28 with 128C, JHU-O11 with 129N, FaDu with 129C, CAL 27 with 130N, JHU-O22 with 130C and JHU-O29 with 131. The labeled samples were pooled and loaded on to a Sep-Pak C18 (Waters) column equilibrated with 0.1% TFA. The column was further washed with 0.1% TFA and the peptides were eluted in 6 ml of 40% ACN with 0.1% TFA. Peptides were lyophilized and subjected to phosphopeptide enrichment. The enrichment of tyrosine phosphorylated peptides from TMT labeled lysates was carried out using Phosphoscan Kit (P-Tyr-1000, Cell signaling technology, Danvers, MA) as described previously29.

LC-MS/MS analysis

LTQ-Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer interfaced with Proxeon Easy nLC system (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) was used for the analysis of TMT-labeled samples. The MS parameters used for analysis were followed as described previously40. Briefly, precursor MS scan (from m/z 350–1,700) and MS/MS was acquired with a mass resolution of 60,000 and 30,000 at 400 m/z in orbitrap mass analyzer. In each duty cycle ten most intense peaks were selected for MS/MS fragmentation using higher-energy collision dissociation mode at 45% normalized collision energy and isolation width was set to 1.9 m/z.

Data analysis

The Proteome Discoverer (Version 1.4.1.14) software suite (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) was used to carry out protein identification and quantitation. Mass spectrometry data was searched against NCBI Human RefSeq protein database (Version 65) supplemented with common contaminants using Mascot (version 2.2.0) and SEQUEST search algorithms. The search parameters included trypsin as the protease with maximum of 2 missed cleavage allowed; oxidation of methionine and phosphorylation of tyrosine, serine and threonine was set as dynamic modifications while static modifications included carbamidomethylation at cysteine and TMT modification at N-terminus of the peptide and lysine. Precursor mass tolerance was set to 10 ppm and fragment mass tolerance was set to 0.05 Da. The false discovery rate (FDR) was calculated by carrying out decoy database searches and peptides scoring better than 1% FDR score cut-off were considered for further analysis42. The ratios were calculated by the quantitation node and the phosphorylation probability was calculated using phosphoRS node in Proteome Discoverer.

Data availability

The mass spectrometry data is publicly available and accessible to other researchers. The complete mass spectrometry data generated from this study has been deposited to the ProteomeXchange (http://www.proteomexchange.org) via PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD002132. The immunohistochemistry data was submitted to Human Proteinpedia43 and can be visualized with the link http://www.humanproteinpedia.org/Experimental_details?exp_id=TE-552658 for adjacent non-neoplastic tissue and http://www.humanproteinpedia.org/Experimental_details?can_id=105424 for tumor tissues.

siRNA Transfection

ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool control siRNA and DYRK1A siRNA were purchased from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO) and cells were transfected with control and DYRK1A siRNA using RNAiMAX reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Cell proliferation assays

Cell proliferation assays was carried out as described previously with minor modifications40. The HNSCC cells were seeded at a density of 8000 cells/well into 96-well plate and treated with DYRK1A siRNA or its inhibitor harmine (20 μM) for 72 h. Cell proliferation was determined using MTT (3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assays as described44. Absorbance was measured at 570 nm and 650 nm. All experiments were carried out in triplicates.

Colony formation assays

Colony formation assays were carried out as described previously with minor modifications45. HNSCC cell lines were seeded at a cell density of 8000 cells per well of a 6-well plate and transfected with either DYRK1A siRNA or control siRNA. After 48 h of transfection, cells were seeded into 6 well plates. Cell colonies were allowed to grow for 10–14 days. The colonies formed were fixed with methanol and stained with 4% methylene blue. Similarly, colony formation was done in the presence of harmine, DYRK1A inhibitor. Colonies formed was counted for ten randomly selected viewing fields and representative images were photographed at 2.5x magnification. All experiments were carried out in triplicate.

Cell invasion assays

Invasion assays were performed in a transwell system (BD Biosciences) with Matrigel-coated filters, and cellular invasion was evaluated after 48 h as described previously45. Briefly, invasiveness of the cells was assayed in the membrane invasion culture system using polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane (8-μm pore size) in the upper compartment of a transwell coated with Matrigel (BD BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber; BD Biosciences). The cells were transfected with either control or DYRK1A siRNA and seeded at 2.0 × 104 cells per 500 μl of media on the Matrigel-coated PET membrane in the upper compartment. The lower compartment was filled with complete growth media and the plates were maintained at 37 °C for 48 h. At the end of the incubation time, the upper surface of the membrane was wiped with a cotton-tip applicator to remove non migratory cells. Cells that migrated to bottom side of membrane were fixed and stained using 4% methylene blue. The number of cells that penetrated was counted for ten randomly selected viewing fields at 10x magnification. Similarly, invasion assay was carried out in the presence of harmine. Each measurement was performed in duplicate and experiments were repeated three times.

In vivo studies

Subcutaneous xenografts were generated in 6-week-old athymic nu/nu female nude mice with CAL 27 (2 × 106) cells in both the flanks of mice. One week following tumor cell inoculation, ten mice with successfully engrafted CAL 27 xenografts (50 mm3) were randomized into two cohorts of five animals per group and were treated with either DMSO (Vehicle) or harmine (15 mg/kg/injection, every 3 days) intraperitoneally (i.p.). Harmine dosage was selected based on previous study13. Tumor size was measured after every 3 days using digital calipers (Fisher Scientific) upto four weeks and the mean tumor volume was calculated using the formula (π/6(d1xd2)3/2)46. All the animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Indian Institute of Sciences, Bangalore, India. All the experiments were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Immunohistochemical assays

Immunohistochemical analysis using commercially available tissue microarray was carried out for DYRK1A. TMAs obtained commercially were processed and immunohistochemical staining was carried out as described previously47. Briefly, the formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections were deparaffinised prior to antigen retrieval by addition of antigen retrieval buffer (citrate buffer) for 20 min. Action of endogenous peroxidases was quenched using blocking solution (methanol and H2O2 mixed at 3:1 ratio) and then washed with wash buffer (phosphate buffered saline). Polyclonal rabbit anti-DYRK1A antibody (Cat #: sc-28899, Santa cruz biotechnology, Santa cruz, CA) was used as a primary antibody at a dilution of 1:50. The sections were incubated overnight with primary antibody at 4 °C. Then the sections were rinsed with wash buffer followed by incubation with rabbit secondary antibody conjugated horseradish peroxidase (Merck-Banglore Genei, India). The staining was developed for 5 min using DAB chromogen (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin (Nice Chemicals, Kochi, India). The tissue sections were then examined under the microscope by pathologist and the immunohistochemical labeling was assessed to score the intensity of staining. The staining was scored on a scale of 0–2, where 0 represented absent staining, +1 represented faint staining and +2 represented intense staining. Cases that were +2 were considered as highly stained cases. A chi-square test was carried out to determine the significance of the immunohistochemistry results. Xenograft tissue sections were examined for the expression of Ki67 marker by immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis.

Western blot analysis

Cells were cultured to 70% confluency and the proteins were harvested in RIPA lysis buffer (10 mM Tris pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton-X-100, 0.1% SDS containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails) and sonicated. Western blot analysis was carried out as described previously45,48. Polyclonal rabbit anti-DYRK1A antibody was obtained from Santa cruz (Santa cruz biotechnology). Anti- FOXO3A, anti-AKT, anti-phospho FOXO3A (Ser 253) and anti-phospho-AKT (Ser 473) antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA). Beta-actin antibody was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).

Annexin V/PI staining

Apoptosis was determined by staining cells with annexin Vfluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and PI labeling as per manufacturer’s instructions (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Briefly, JHU-O28 and CAL 27 cells were treated with or without harmine. The prepared cells were washed twice with cold PBS, resuspended in 1 ml of binding buffer. 100 ul of the resuspended culture is stained with Annexin V and PI. The cells were analyzed on the BD FACSVerseTM flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Data analysis was done using “FlowJo” software.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Radhakrishnan, A. et al. A dual specificity kinase, DYRK1A, as a potential therapeutic target for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 6, 36132; doi: 10.1038/srep36132 (2016).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep36132-s1.pdf (943.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India for research support to the Institute of Bioinformatics (IOB), Bangalore. We thank the “Infosys Foundation” for research support to IOB. AC was supported by Department of Science and Technology (DST) grants (SERC/LS-439/2011 and SR/SO/HS/0208/2013). IOB is supported by DBT Program Support on Neuroproteomics and infrastructure for proteomic data analysis (BT/01/COE/08/05). AR, GS and SC are recipients of Senior Research Fellowship from Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India. RR is a recipient of research associateship from DBT. We thank Dr. S. K. Shankar and Dr. Anita Mahadevan of National Institute of Mental Health and Neurological Sciences (NIMHANS), for providing access to the microscopy imaging facility. We thank Dr. V. Ravi for providing access to advanced FACS facility in NIMHANS. We thank Ms. Neha Deshpande for technical inputs with fluorescence imaging.

Footnotes

Author Contributions A.C., H.G. and A.P. designed the study. D.S. and J.A.C. provided cell lines and scientific inputs. A.Rad, V.N., R.R., S.M.P., V.N.P., A.P.J., N.A.S. and S.A.B. performed the experiments. G.Sat and S.C. carried out LC-MS/MS analysis. M.M.K. did the flow cytometry analysis. A.Rad and A.C. prepared the manuscript. V.S. scored the tissue microarrays. P.P.M., T.S.K.P., G.Suk, A.Ran, A.P., H.G. and A.C. edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

References

  1. Leemans C. R., Braakhuis B. J. & Brakenhoff R. H. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 11, 9–22, 10.1038/nrc2982 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Siegel R., Ma J., Zou Z. & Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 64, 9–29, 10.3322/caac.21208 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Machiels J. P. et al. Advances in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. F1000Prime Rep 6, 44, 10.12703/P6-44 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu P., Nielsen T. E. & Clausen M. H. FDA-approved small-molecule kinase inhibitors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 36, 422–439, 10.1016/j.tips.2015.04.005 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Druker B. J. et al. Activity of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome. N Engl J Med 344, 1038–1042, MJBA-441402 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Druker B. J. et al. Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr-Abl positive cells. Nat Med 2, 561–566 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen R. B. Current challenges and clinical investigations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)- and ErbB family-targeted agents in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Cancer Treat Rev 40, 567–577, 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.10.002 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harsha H. C. & Pandey A. Phosphoproteomics in cancer. Mol Oncol 4, 482–495, 10.1016/j.molonc.2010.09.004 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Walte A. et al. Mechanism of dual specificity kinase activity of DYRK1A. FEBS J 280, 4495–4511, 10.1111/febs.12411 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu Q. et al. Tumor suppressor DYRK1A effects on proliferation and chemoresistance of AML cells by downregulating c-Myc. PLoS One 9, e98853, 10.1371/journal.pone.0098853 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Seifert A., Allan L. A. & Clarke P. R. DYRK1A phosphorylates caspase 9 at an inhibitory site and is potently inhibited in human cells by harmine. FEBS J 275, 6268–6280, 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06751.x (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marti E. et al. Dyrk1A expression pattern supports specific roles of this kinase in the adult central nervous system. Brain Res 964, 250–263, S0006899302040696 [pii] (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pozo N. et al. Inhibition of DYRK1A destabilizes EGFR and reduces EGFR-dependent glioblastoma growth. J Clin Invest 123, 2475–2487, 10.1172/JCI63623 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao J. et al. The involvement of FoxO in cell survival and chemosensitivity mediated by Mirk/Dyrk1B in ovarian cancer. Int J Oncol 40, 1203–1209, 10.3892/ijo.2011.1293 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gao J. et al. Mirk/Dyrk1B, a novel therapeutic target, mediates cell survival in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther 8, 1671–1679, 9322 [pii] (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Deng X. et al. The kinase Mirk/Dyrk1B mediates cell survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 66, 4149–4158, 66/8/4149 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ewton D. Z. et al. Inactivation of mirk/dyrk1b kinase targets quiescent pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 10, 2104–2114, 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0498 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Leibowitz M. S. et al. SHP2 is overexpressed and inhibits pSTAT1-mediated APM component expression, T-cell attracting chemokine secretion, and CTL recognition in head and neck cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 19, 798–808, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1517 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wheeler S. E. et al. Lyn kinase mediates cell motility and tumor growth in EGFRvIII-expressing head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res 18, 2850–2860, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2486 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu Z. et al. Quantitative chemical proteomics reveals new potential drug targets in head and neck cancer. Mol Cell Proteomics 10, M111 011635, 10.1074/mcp.M111.011635 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Himpel S. et al. Identification of the autophosphorylation sites and characterization of their effects in the protein kinase DYRK1A. Biochem J 359, 497–505 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Adayev T., Wegiel J. & Hwang Y. W. Harmine is an ATP-competitive inhibitor for dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (Dyrk1A). Arch Biochem Biophys 507, 212–218, 10.1016/j.abb.2010.12.024 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Abekhoukh S. et al. Dyrk1A, a serine/threonine kinase, is involved in ERK and Akt activation in the brain of hyperhomocysteinemic mice. Mol Neurobiol 47, 105–116, 10.1007/s12035-012-8326-1 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Woods Y. L. et al. The kinase DYRK1A phosphorylates the transcription factor FKHR at Ser329 in vitro, a novel in vivo phosphorylation site. Biochem J 355, 597–607 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Burgering B. M. & Medema R. H. Decisions on life and death: FOXO Forkhead transcription factors are in command when PKB/Akt is off duty. J Leukoc Biol 73, 689–701 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang J. Y. et al. ERK promotes tumorigenesis by inhibiting FOXO3a via MDM2-mediated degradation. Nat Cell Biol 10, 138–148, 10.1038/ncb1676 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Brunet A. et al. Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a Forkhead transcription factor. Cell 96, 857–868, S0092-8674(00)80595-4 [pii] (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zheng W. H., Kar S. & Quirion R. Insulin-like growth factor-1-induced phosphorylation of the forkhead family transcription factor FKHRL1 is mediated by Akt kinase in PC12 cells. J Biol Chem 275, 39152–39158, 10.1074/jbc.M002417200 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Syed N. et al. Phosphotyrosine profiling identifies ephrin receptor A2 as a potential therapeutic target in esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Proteomics 15, 374–382, 10.1002/pmic.201400379 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Johnson H., Lescarbeau R. S., Gutierrez J. A. & White F. M. Phosphotyrosine profiling of NSCLC cells in response to EGF and HGF reveals network specific mediators of invasion. J Proteome Res 12, 1856–1867, 10.1021/pr301192t (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang J., Yang P. L. & Gray N. S. Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 9, 28–39, 10.1038/nrc2559 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Harsha H. C. et al. Activated epidermal growth factor receptor as a novel target in pancreatic cancer therapy. J Proteome Res 7, 4651–4658, 10.1021/pr800139r (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hector A. et al. The Axl receptor tyrosine kinase is an adverse prognostic factor and a therapeutic target in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther 10, 1009–1018, 10.4161/cbt.10.10.13248 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Becker W. et al. Sequence characteristics, subcellular localization, and substrate specificity of DYRK-related kinases, a novel family of dual specificity protein kinases. J Biol Chem 273, 25893–25902 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Fernandez-Martinez P., Zahonero C. & Sanchez-Gomez P. DYRK1A: the double-edged kinase as a protagonist in cell growth and tumorigenesis. Mol Cell Oncol 2, e970048, 10.4161/23723548.2014.970048 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Taira N., Nihira K., Yamaguchi T., Miki Y. & Yoshida K. DYRK2 is targeted to the nucleus and controls p53 via Ser46 phosphorylation in the apoptotic response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 25, 725–738, S1097-2765(07)00087-1 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Litovchick L., Florens L. A., Swanson S. K., Washburn M. P. & DeCaprio J. A. DYRK1A protein kinase promotes quiescence and senescence through DREAM complex assembly. Genes Dev 25, 801–813, 10.1101/gad.2034211(2011) . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Stahl M. et al. The forkhead transcription factor FoxO regulates transcription of p27Kip1 and Bim in response to IL-2. J Immunol 168, 5024–5031 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kim M. S. et al. A draft map of the human proteome. Nature 509, 575–581, 10.1038/nature13302 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Syed N. et al. Silencing of high-mobility group box 2 (HMGB2) modulates cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil sensitivity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Proteomics 15, 383–393, 10.1002/pmic.201400338 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nirujogi R. S. et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals compensatory effects in the piriform cortex of VX nerve agent exposed rats. Proteomics 15, 487–499, 10.1002/pmic.201400371 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kandasamy K., Pandey A. & Molina H. Evaluation of several MS/MS search algorithms for analysis of spectra derived from electron transfer dissociation experiments. Anal Chem 81, 7170–7180, 10.1021/ac9006107 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mathivanan S. et al. Human Proteinpedia enables sharing of human protein data. Nat Biotechnol 26, 164–167, 10.1038/nbt0208-164 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Chatterjee A., Mambo E., Zhang Y., Deweese T. & Sidransky D. Targeting of mutant hogg1 in mammalian mitochondria and nucleus: effect on cellular survival upon oxidative stress. BMC Cancer 6, 235, 1471-2407-6-235 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Subbannayya Y. et al. Calcium calmodulin dependent kinase kinase 2 - a novel therapeutic target for gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther 16, 336–345, 10.4161/15384047.2014.972264 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Raja R. et al. Hypoxia-driven osteopontin contributes to breast tumor growth through modulation of HIF1alpha-mediated VEGF-dependent angiogenesis. Oncogene 33, 2053–2064, 10.1038/onc.2013.171 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kashyap M. K. et al. Genomewide mRNA profiling of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for identification of cancer biomarkers. Cancer Biol Ther 8, 36–46, 7090 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Chang X. et al. Adenylate kinase 3 sensitizes cells to cigarette smoke condensate vapor induced cisplatin resistance. PLoS One 6, e20806, 10.1371/journal.pone.0020806 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep36132-s1.pdf (943.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The mass spectrometry data is publicly available and accessible to other researchers. The complete mass spectrometry data generated from this study has been deposited to the ProteomeXchange (http://www.proteomexchange.org) via PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD002132. The immunohistochemistry data was submitted to Human Proteinpedia43 and can be visualized with the link http://www.humanproteinpedia.org/Experimental_details?exp_id=TE-552658 for adjacent non-neoplastic tissue and http://www.humanproteinpedia.org/Experimental_details?can_id=105424 for tumor tissues.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES