Skip to main content
Emerging Infectious Diseases logoLink to Emerging Infectious Diseases
. 2016 Nov;22(11):1978–1980. doi: 10.3201/eid2211.151450

Novel Levofloxacin-Resistant Multidrug-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Serotype 11A Isolates, South Korea

Miey Park 1, Hyun Soo Kim 1, Han-Sung Kim 1, Ji Young Park 1, Wonkeun Song 1, Hyoun Chan Cho 1, Jae-Seok Kim 1,
PMCID: PMC5088008  PMID: 27767906

Abstract

Of 608 Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical strains isolated at a hospital in South Korea during 2009–2014, sixteen (2.6%) were identified as levofloxacin resistant. The predominant serotype was 11A (9 isolates). Two novel sequence types of multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae with serotype 11A were identified, indicating continuous diversification of resistant strains.

Keywords: Streptococcus pneumoniae, multidrug-resistant, MDR, levofloxacin-resistant, serotype 11A, bacteria, South Korea, antimicrobial resistance, streptococci, respiratory infections


Streptococcus pneumoniae is a common respiratory pathogen that is the leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia (1). Although β-lactam antibiotics have long been used for the treatment of respiratory diseases, the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant S. pneumoniae strains has hampered treatment in recent decades (2,3). Resistance to fluoroquinolones has emerged in S. pneumoniae and is caused by mutations within short DNA sequences of gyrA and parC genes that encode the type II topoisomerase subunits known as quinolone-resistance determining regions (QRDRs) (1). Previous studies have shown that most of the S. pneumoniae strains with reduced susceptibility to the fluoroquinolone levofloxacin exhibit a multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotype (2,4). Levofloxacin resistance was closely associated with epidemic MDR clones (3). Although fluoroquinolone resistance rates remain low in S. pneumoniae in most countries, some extensively drug-resistant (XDR) S. pneumoniae isolates have emerged; this resistance is defined as nonsusceptibility to >1 agent in all but <2 antimicrobial categories (2,4). We examined S. pnemoniae isolates from patients in South Korea to determine antimicrobial resistance. We found novel sequence types (STs) of MDR serotype 11A S. pneumoniae that exhibit resistance to second-line antibiotics such as levofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and meropenem.

The Study

During January 2009–December 2014, we isolated 608 S. pneumoniae clinical strains at a 698-bed, university-affiliated hospital in South Korea. We determined MICs by using the broth microdilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (5). We performed antimicrobial resistance tests for levofloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin, amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, meropenem, erythromycin, clindamycin, vancomycin, linezolid, tetracycline, and tigecycline. We used S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 as a control strain. We defined MDR as resistance or intermediate resistance to >3 antimicrobial agents.

We determined serotypes by using the multiplex PCR assay recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/pcr.htm). Reactions also included an internal positive control targeting all known pneumococcal cpsA regions (6). We sequenced QRDRs of the gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes in each isolate (7). We performed multilocus sequence typing to investigate the genetic backgrounds of fluoroquinolone-resistant pneumococci (8) and assigned allele numbers and STs by using the PubMLST database (http://pubmlst.org/spneumoniae).

Of the 608 clinical S. pneumoniae isolates, 16 (2.6%) were levofloxacin resistant (MIC >8 μg/mL). We collected 1 resistant isolate in 2009, 3 in 2012, 5 in 2013, and 7 in 2014. Thirteen isolates were from sputum, and 3 isolates were from bronchial lavage. The mean age of patients was 71 years; 14 were male, and 2 were female.

Serotype 11A (n = 9) was most common among the levofloxacin-resistant isolates, followed by serotypes 13 (n = 2), 19F (n = 2), 23F (n = 2), and 6B (n = 1) (Table 1). The most common STs were ST9875 (n = 5), ST8279 (n = 3), and ST9876 (n = 3), which together accounted for 11 of the 16 levofloxacin-resistant isolates. Nine isolates of ST9875, ST9876, and ST10300 were novel STs and had not been identified before this study.

Table 1. Select characteristics of 16 levofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates identified from patients at a hospital in South Korea, 2009–2014*†.

Strain
Age, y/sex of patient
Specimen type
Respiratory disorders
Underlying disorders
Serotype
Sequence type
HM-646 36/M Sputum Pneumonia CVA 11A 9875‡
HM-669 70/M Sputum Pneumonia CVA 11A 9875‡
HM-683 77/M Sputum Pneumonia COPD 6B 3173
HM-688 81/M Sputum Pneumonia Cardiac infarction 23F 9876‡
HM-730 77/M Sputum Dyspnea with fever Cervical pain 13 189
HM-762 76/F Sputum Pneumonia Lung cancer 13 8279
HM-781 70/M Sputum Pneumonia CVA 23F 6721
HM-787 35/M Sputum Pneumonia CVA 11A 9875‡
HM-809 58/M Sputum Pneumonia CVA 11A 9875‡
HM-854 77/M BL Pneumonia Lung cancer 11A 99
HM-878 67/M BL Pneumonia ALS 11A 8279
HM-953 82/M Sputum Pneumonia COPD 11A 9875‡
HM-970 68/M Sputum Dyspnea with fever Bronchiectasis 19F 9876‡
HM-1017 85/M BL Dyspnea Lung cancer 11A 8279
HM-1050 62/M Sputum Postop atelectasis CVA 19F 9876‡
HM-1055 89/F Sputum Pneumonia CVA 11A 10300‡

*ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; BL, bronchial lavage; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder; CVA, cerebrovascular accident.
†Among the 16 isolates, 1 (HM-646) was collected in 2009; 3 (HM-669, HM-683, and HM-688) in 2012; 5 (HM-730, HM-762, HM-781, HM-787, and HM-809) in 2013; and 7 (HM-854, HM-878, HM-953, HM-970, HM-1017, HM-1050, and HM-1055) in 2014.
‡Novel sequence type found in our study.

All 16 levofloxacin-resistant isolates contained at least 2 amino acid alterations in the QRDRs of the gyrA, parC, and parE genes. Four QRDR mutations occurred with high frequency: Ser81Phe in gyrA was present in all 16 isolates; Ser79Phe and Lys137Asn in parC were present in 14 and 11 isolates, respectively; and Ile460Val in parE was found in 15 isolates. However, Lys137Asn in parC and Asp435Val and Ile460Val in parE are mutations not involved in resistance, according to previous reports (9,10). Isolate HM-854, which was penicillin susceptible, had Ser81Phe in gyrA and Asp79Asn in parC mutations. All isolates had >1 mutation in parC. The 2 isolates without the Ser79Phe mutation in parC instead carried Asp83Gly or Asp83Asn. The 4 isolates without the Lys137Asn mutation in parC instead carried the Asn91Asp mutation. Isolate HM-1017 (serotype 11A, ST-8279) had 7 QRDR mutations and exhibited the highest resistance against all antimicrobial agents, including levofloxacin (MIC 64 μg/mL). ST-8279 was associated with 2 different serotypes, 11A (n = 2) and 13 (n = 1). The 3 isolates of novel ST-9876 had the same QRDR amino acid changes but had different serotypes, 19F (n = 2) and 23F (n = 1).

The 16 levofloxacin-resistant isolates were also resistant to ofloxacin (MIC >8 μg/mL) and ciprofloxacin (MIC >8 μg/mL) (Table 2). All isolates except 3 had MICs >16 μg/mL against amoxicillin and ceftriaxone. Fourteen isolates were meropenem-resistant (MIC >1 μg/mL); all these isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid. Only 3 STs (ST-99, ST-189, and ST-3173) exhibited the lowest levofloxacin MIC (8 μg/mL); all these isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin (MIC <2 μg/mL).

Table 2. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of 16 levofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates identified from patients at a hospital in South Korea, 2009–2014*.

Strain
MIC, μg/mL (resistance)
LEV
OFL
CIP†
PEN
AMX
CRO
MER
ERY
CLI
VAN
LZD
TET
TIG†
HM-646 16 (R) 32 (R) 32 >16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 1 (S) >16 (R) 0.03
HM-669 16 (R) 32 (R) 32 >16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 8 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 1 (S) >16 (R) 0.03
HM-683 8 (R) 16 (R) 16 4 (I) 2 (S) 2 (I) 1 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 1 (S) >16 (R) 0.03
HM-688 16 (R) 32 (R) 32 >16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 8 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 1 (S) >16 (R) 0.03
HM-730 8 (R) 16 (R) 8 4 (I) 2 (S) 2 (I) 0.5 (I) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 0.5 (S) >16 (R) 0.03
HM-762 32 (R) 64 (R) 32 >16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 0.5 (S) >16 (R) 0.015
HM-781 16 (R) 32 (R) 16 16 (R) 16 (R) >16 (R) 8 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 0.5 (S) 16 (R) 0.03
HM-787 16 (R) 32 (R) 64 16 (R) 16 (R) >16 (R) 8 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 1 (S) >16 (R) 0.03
HM-809 16 (R) 32 (R) 64 16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 4 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 1 (S) >16 (R) 0.03
HM-854 8 (R) 16 (R) 16 0.06 (S) 0.06 (S) 0.5 (S) <0.015 (S) 8 (R) 0.06 (S) 0.5 (S) 1 (S) >16 (R) 0.03
HM-878 16 (R) 32 (R) 32 16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 8 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 1 (S) 4 (R) 0.03
HM-953 16 (R) 32 (R) 64 >16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 1 (S) >16 (R) 0.03
HM-970 32 (R) 64 (R) 32 >16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 1 (S) >16 (R) 0.03
HM-1017 64 (R) 128 (R) 64 >16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 1 (S) >16 (R) 0.03
HM-1050 32 (R) 64 (R) 64 >16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 1 (S) 0.5 (S) 0.03
HM-1055 16 (R) 32 (R) 128 >16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 16 (R) >16 (R) >16 (R) 0.5 (S) 1 (S) >16 (R) 0.03

*AMX, amoxicillin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CLI, clindamycin; CRO, ceftriaxone; ERY, erythromycin; I, intermediate; LEV, levofloxacin; LZD, linezolid; MER, meropenem; OFL, ofloxacin; PEN, penicillin; R, resistant; S, susceptible; TET, tetracycline; TIG, tigecycline; VAN, vancomycin.
†No susceptibility breakpoints are established for ciprofloxacin and tigecycline.

Most of the 16 isolates in our study were of serotype 11A (n = 9): 5 isolates of ST-9875, 2 of ST-8279, and 1 each of ST-10300 and ST-99. An XDR ST-8279 (serotype 13) clone described in 2014 (2) was closely related to the 9 serotype 11A isolates in our study. ST-8279 is a double-locus (aroE and xpt) variant of ST-156, which is closely related to global clone Spain9V-3 (2). Spain9V-3 is related to 3 ST-3642 isolates (serotype 11A) reported in Taiwan in 2010 (11) and to 3 MDR ST-166 isolates (serotype 11A) reported in South Korea in 2013 (12). In our study, 3 novel STs of MDR S. pneumoniae were identified (ST-9875, ST-9876, and ST-10300). All the ST-8279, ST-9875, and ST-10300 isolates in our study were serotype 11A, with the exception of 1 of the ST-8279 isolates. The ST-9875 and ST-10300 isolates were single-locus variants (in the spi and gki genes, respectively) of ST-8279. ST-9876 is a 1-locus (aroE) variant of an ST-3384 (serotype 9V) clone registered in the PubMLST database.

Serotypes 19F and 23F are included in the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine (PCV13), but serotype 11A is not included in PCV13. Serotype 11A is, however, included in the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23). The US CDC currently recommends the PPSV23 for all adults >65 years of age and all persons 2–64 years of age who are at high risk for pneumococcal disease (13). Through national vaccine programs in South Korea, since 2013, PPSV23 has been provided to all adults >65 years of age, and since 2014, 10-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine or PCV13 have been provided to young children free of charge (14).

Conclusions

In South Korea, serotype 11A was the most predominant serotype of the 16 levofloxacin-resistant and XDR S. pneumoniae isolates we found. Seven levofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains were isolated in 2014 alone; the dominant serotype was again 11A (n = 5). All except 1 of these 7 serotype 11A isolates were resistant to the 9 different antimicrobial agents tested. We identified 3 novel STs of MDR serotype 11A S. pneumoniae in our study. S. pneumoniae serotype 11A isolates with novel STs require careful monitoring to combat the increasing prevalence and diversification of MDR pneumococcal strains, especially those with resistance to fluoroquinolones, β-lactams, and third-generation cephalosporins.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Hallym University Research Fund 2015 (HURF-2015-37).

Biography

Dr. Park is a senior researcher at Hallym University’s Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital in Seoul, South Korea. Her primary research interests include clinical research on emerging infections, vaccine-preventable diseases, and foodborne pathogens.

Footnotes

Suggested citation for this article: Park M, Kim HS, Kim H-S, Park JY, Song W, Cho HC, et al. Novel levofloxacin-resistant multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 11A isolates, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Nov [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2211.151450

References

  • 1.Redgrave LS, Sutton SB, Webber MA, Piddock LJ. Fluoroquinolone resistance: mechanisms, impact on bacteria, and role in evolutionary success. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:438–45. 10.1016/j.tim.2014.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cho SY, Baek JY, Kang CI, Kim SH, Ha YE, Chung DR, et al. Extensively drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, South Korea, 2011-2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:869–71. 10.3201/eid2005.131371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim SH, Song JH, Chung DR, Thamlikitkul V, Yang Y, Wang H, et al. ; ANSORP Study Group. Changing trends in antimicrobial resistance and serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in Asian countries: an Asian Network for Surveillance of Resistant Pathogens (ANSORP) study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:1418–26. 10.1128/AAC.05658-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kang CI, Baek JY, Jeon K, Kim SH, Chung DR, Peck KR, et al. Bacteremic pneumonia caused by extensively drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:4175–7. 10.1128/JCM.01642-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty-fourth informational supplement. M100–S24. Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pai R, Gertz RE, Beall B. Sequential multiplex PCR approach for determining capsular serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:124–31. 10.1128/JCM.44.1.124-131.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pan XS, Ambler J, Mehtar S, Fisher LM. Involvement of topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase as ciprofloxacin targets in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2321–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Enright MC, Spratt BG. A multilocus sequence typing scheme for Streptococcus pneumoniae: identification of clones associated with serious invasive disease. Microbiology. 1998;144:3049–60. 10.1099/00221287-144-11-3049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Richter SS, Heilmann KP, Beekmann SE, Miller NJ, Rice CL, Doern GV. The molecular epidemiology of Streptococcus pneumoniae with quinolone resistance mutations. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:225–35. 10.1086/426817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Duesberg CB, Welte T, Pletz MW. The Lys137Asn mutation as surrogate marker for developing fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae? J Chemother. 2007;19:750–1, discussion 751–2. 10.1179/joc.2007.19.6.750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hsieh YC, Chang LY, Huang YC, Lin HC, Huang LM, Hsueh PR. Circulation of international clones of levofloxacin non-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae in Taiwan. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:973–8. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02951.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee S, Kim SH, Park M, Bae S. High prevalence of multiresistance in levofloxacin-nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in Korea. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;76:227–31. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.02.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nuorti JP, Whitney CG; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention of pneumococcal disease among infants and children - use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine - recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-11):1–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang TU, Kim E, Park YJ, Kim D, Kwon YH, Shin JK, et al. Successful introduction of an underutilized elderly pneumococcal vaccine in a national immunization program by integrating the pre-existing public health infrastructure. Vaccine. 2016;34:1623–9. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.01.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emerging Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES