To the Editor: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a protozoan disease transmitted by sand flies that usually runs a relatively mild course. Classic CL starts as a red papule at the place of the insect bite; it gradually enlarges into a painless nodule or plaque-like lesion, which eventually becomes encrusted. When the crust falls off, a typical ulcer with raised and indurated border becomes apparent. CL can cause considerable illness and may leave disfiguring and disabling scars after healing. The interplay between Leishmania species and host immune response is complex, and, as a result, disease manifestations may vary substantially among species as well as among infected persons (1,2). An estimated 0.7–1.2 million new CL cases occur annually in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. CL is currently endemic in >98 countries worldwide; Afghanistan, Algeria, Colombia, Brazil, Iran, Syria, Ethiopia, North Sudan, Costa Rica, and Peru together account for up to 75% of global estimated CL incidence (3).
We report 3 travel companions from the Netherlands who all acquired CL after they participated in a short-term study course in Israel during September–October 2015. The travelers visited several places in the Negev Desert in southern Israel. All cases were confirmed by PCR with additional sequence analysis of the mini-exon locus and the 3′ untranslated region of the HSP70 locus, demonstrating L. major as the causative species (4).
The first case-patient was a 55-year-old man who observed red papules on his head and shoulder 1 month after he returned to the Netherlands. Gradually, these papules increased in size, and number and showed a tendency to ulcerate. On examination at the Institute for Tropical Diseases in Rotterdam, 12 painless, hyperkeratotic, plaquelike, sharply demarcated lesions were identified, some partially ulcerated, located on the head, shoulders, arms, legs, and across the chest. Histopathologic examination on skin biopsy specimens acquired from 1 lesion revealed Leishmania amastigotes, consistent with a diagnosis of CL. The patient was treated with miltefosine (50 mg orally 3×/d for 28). Clinical recovery followed gradually.
The second case-patient, a 52-year-old woman, noticed some red papules on both legs that gradually increased in size and ulcerated in the 2 months after return to the Netherlands. She was initially treated by a general practitioner for a presumed bacterial skin infection but did not show a clinical response to antibiotic treatment. On examination, also at the Institute for Tropical Diseases, 6 painless ulcers were seen on her legs. CL was suspected after taking into account the clinical manifestations and the recent diagnosis of CL in her travel companion. She was successfully treated with miltefosine after the diagnosis was confirmed.
A third case-patient, a 52-year-old woman, was diagnosed with CL after she sought treatment for a single small, sharply demarcated, painless pretibial plaquelike skin lesion on her arm that had been present for 2 months after her return to the Netherlands. Repeated PCRs of skin biopsy specimens confirmed the diagnosis of L. major CL. She preferred a “wait and see” policy over treatment.
The 3 patients with CL, a cluster of travel companions, were conceivably infected in the Negev Desert. Only 1 previous report has documented a traveler returning from Israel who was diagnosed with CL at the Institute for Tropical Diseases during 2007–2016 (Table). Most cases originated from the New World, in particular from South America, followed by Central America (Table). Few of these cases originated from the Old World, where most of the global effects of CL occur. CL is more frequently diagnosed among long-term travelers such as military personnel, adventure travelers, photographers, and researchers, rather than among short-term travelers (5).
Table. Characteristics of 3 travel companions to Israel and a cohort of patients with imported cutaneous leishmaniasis previously diagnosed at the Institute for Tropical Diseases, Harbour Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 2007–2016.
Characteristics | Case-patient 1 | Case-patient 2 | Case-patient 3 | Cohort, n = 27* |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age, y (SD) |
55.2 |
52.6 |
52.3 |
45.4 (15.2) |
Sex |
M |
F |
F |
M: 19 (70.4); F: 8 (29.6) |
New World/Old World |
Old World |
Old World |
Old World |
New World: 18 (66.7); Old World: 9 (33.3) |
Country of acquisition |
Israel |
Israel |
Israel |
Argentina: 1 (3.7); Brazil; 2 (7.4); Costa Rica: 2 (7.4); Ecuador: 3 (11.1); Ethiopia: 1 (3.7); French-Guyana: 1 (3.7); Israel: 1 (3.7); Mexico: 1 (3.7); Morocco: 4 (14.8); Peru: 1 (3.7); Spain: 2 (7.4); Suriname: 6 (22.2); Trinidad and Tobago: 1 (3.7); Turkey: 1 (3.7) |
Reason for visit |
Tourism |
Tourism |
Tourism |
Tourism: 18 (66.7); work-related visit: 2 (7.4); family visit: 6 (22.2); unknown: 1 (3.4) |
Clinical manifestation |
Ulceration/plaque-like lesion |
Ulceration |
Plaque-like lesion |
Erythematous papule: 1 (3.7); nodule/plaquelike lesion: 9 (33.3); ulceration: 17 (63.0) |
Mean no. skin lesions |
12 |
6 |
1 |
1.6 (median 1.0, range 1.0–5.0) |
Localization |
≥1 localization |
≥1 localization |
Lower leg |
Face: 4 (14.8); upper arm: 3 (11.1); lower arm: 10 (37.0); upper leg: 0; lower leg: 6 (22.2); trunk or neck: 1 (3.7); ≥1 localization: 3 (11.1) |
Diagnostic method |
Histology/PCR |
Histology/PCR |
Histology/PCR |
Histology: 0; PCR: 19 (70.3); histology/PCR: 8 (29.7) |
Leishmania spp. |
L. major
|
L. major
|
L. major
|
L. major: 2 (7.4); L. tropica: 1 (3.7); L. infantum: 4 (14.8); L. donovani: 1 (3.7); L. mexicana: 1 (3.7); L .braziliensis: 7 (25.9); L. guyanensis: 4 (14.8); L. panamensis: 1 (3.7); L. lainsoni: 1 (3.7); Unknown: 5 (18.5) |
Treatment | Miltefosine | Miltefosine | Wait and see | Cryotherapy: 2 (7.4); topical paromomycin/methylbenzethoniumchloride: 1 (3.7); theurapeutic excision: 1 (3.7); fluconazole: 1 (3.7); pentamidineisethionate: 2 (7.4); systemic stibogluconate: 3 (11.1); miltefosine: 17 (63.0) |
*Values are no. (%) except as indicated.
Recent reports have described a 7-fold increase in L. major CL cases among inhabitants of the Negev Desert (6), with urban expansion into CL-endemic foci and changes in land use currently regarded as the most probable causes for this increase in incidence (6,7). A concurrent increase among travelers has not occurred so far, although the aforementioned cases might indicate that the increasing risk of contracting CL in the Negev Desert is not only restricted to its inhabitants but may also pose a risk to short-term travelers.
The spectrum of disease of CL is highly variable, even among persons infected with the same Leishmania species (1,2,8), as illustrated by this cluster of L. major CL cases among persons who traveled together to Israel. Because L. major CL might mimic other infectious and inflammatory diseases, physicians assessing travelers with painless and persistent skin ulcers after their return from CL-endemic countries should therefore consider CL in their differential diagnosis. In conclusion, awareness should be raised among physicians and healthcare workers that CL is not exclusively limited to tropical countries but may also be acquired by short-term travelers to more temperate regions, such as southern Europe and the Levant (Syria, Lebanon, Israel, and Jordan) (3,9).
Footnotes
Suggested citation for this article: Kuilder JS, Wismans PJ, Baerveldt EM, van Hellemond JJ, de Mendonça Melo M, van Genderen PJJ. Leishmania major cutaneous leishmaniasis in 3 travelers returning from Israel to the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Nov [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2211.161154
References
- 1.Farrar J, Kang G, Hotez PJ, White NJ, Junghanss T, Lalloo D. Manson’s tropical diseases, 23rd edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organization. Control of the leishmaniases. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2010;949(xii-xiii):1e186 [cited 2016 Sep 12]. whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_949_eng.pdf [PubMed]
- 3.World Health Organization. Leishmaniasis: epidemiology and access to medicines. Geneva: the Organization; 2012. [cited 2016 Jul 4]. http://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/
- 4.Van der Auwera G, Ravel C, Verweij JJ, Bart A, Schönian G, Felger I. Evaluation of four single-locus markers for Leishmania species discrimination by sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:1098–104. 10.1128/JCM.02936-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mansueto P, Seidita A, Vitale G, Cascio A. Leishmaniasis in travelers: a literature review. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2014;12(6 Pt A):563–81. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2014.09.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ben-Shimol S, Sagi O, Codish S, Novack V, Barrett C, Fruchtman Y, et al. Dramatic increase in laboratory-diagnosed human cutaneous leishmaniasis cases in southern Israel, 2007–2013. Infect Dis (Lond). 2015;47:161–7. 10.3109/00365548.2014.977342 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Gandacu D, Glazer Y, Anis E, Karakis I, Warshavsky B, Slater P, et al. Resurgence of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Israel, 2001-2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:1605–11. 10.3201/eid2010.140182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Solomon M, Greenberger S, Baum S, Pavlotsky F, Barzilai A, Schwartz E. Unusual forms of cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania major. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:1171–5. 10.1111/jdv.13220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ehehalt U, Schunk M, Jensenius M, van Genderen PJ, Gkrania-Klotsas E, Chappuis F, et al. Leishmaniasis acquired by travellers to endemic regions in Europe: a EuroTravNet multi-centre study. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2014;12:167–72. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2013.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]