Skip to main content
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery logoLink to Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
. 2016 Jul 6;22(5):275–283. doi: 10.5761/atcs.ra.16-00111

Current Advancement in Multidisciplinary Treatment for Resectable cStage II/III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Japan

Satoru Matsuda 1, Hiroya Takeuchi 1,, Hirofumi Kawakubo 1, Nobutoshi Ando 2, Yuko Kitagawa 1
PMCID: PMC5088392  PMID: 27384595

Abstract

Multidisciplinary treatment comprising surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is widely used with improved prognosis. Transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) with extended lymph node (LN) dissection, known as three field LN dissection, has been recommended for ESCC using open thoracotomy or the thoracoscopic approach. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) trial (JCOG1409) is investigating the patients’ long term survival using the thoracoscopic approach that has been shown to reduce the incidence of postoperative respiratory complication. For perioperative treatment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy using cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), has been accepted as the standard of care in Japan based on the JCOG9907 trial. In Western countries, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was shown to prolong overall survival for esophageal cancer, including ESCC. Although surgery has been recognized as an initial curative treatment for esophageal cancer, definitive chemoradiotherapy is an alternative treatment for patients who are unable to undergo thoracotomy or who decline to undergo surgery. This article reviews multidisciplinary treatment advances for ESCC. However, current standard treatments are country dependent and the ongoing trial may help standardize ESCC treatment across various societies.

Keywords: esophageal cancer, esophagectomy, multidisciplinary treatment

Introduction

Esophageal cancer has high metastatic potential and a worse prognosis. Due to its abundant lymphatic flow, lymph node (LN) metastasis could occur in early stages of cancer. In patients with resectable cStage II/III esophageal cancer, surgery is the standard of care. However, postoperative recurrence has been observed in more than half of all patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE), and prognosis has not been satisfactory.1,2) Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in addition to surgery has been shown to be effective in esophageal cancer. Currently, a multidisciplinary treatment comprising of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy is widely used with improvement in prognosis. Multidisciplinary treatment is used in many countries but the combinations of modalities are country dependent. This review describes multidisciplinary treatments for resectable cStage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Japan, and reviews previous comparative trials for ESCC.

Surgical Procedure

Esophageal cancer has abundant lymphatic flow and can lead to metastasis even in the early stages. As the lymphatic flow is multidirectional, LN metastasis is widespread and random. In particular, LN metastasis of mid-thoracic esophageal cancer has been observed in the cervical to abdominal LNs.3) In order to control the LN metastasis, extended LN dissection has been recommended where mediastinal LNs with bilateral recurrent nerve LNs, and abdominal LNs including LNs around the gastric cardia and LNs along the lesser curvature of the stomach and left gastric artery are routinely dissected.4) In patients with primary tumors between the upper- and mid-thoracic esophagus, three field LN dissection (FD) was carried out in which supraclavicular LNs were dissected simultaneously. Akiyama et al. showed that patients who underwent TTE with 3 FD had significant improvement in overall survival compared to patients who underwent TTE with 2 FD.5) Furthermore, based on the efficacy index which was calculated using the metastatic rate and 5-year survival rate of patients who had metastasis, the 3 FD was shown to be effective for ESCC of the mid-thoracic esophagus.6)

TTE can be performed by open thoracotomy or the thoracoscopic approach. Open thoracotomy has been the globally used classical standard procedure. In contrast, the thoracoscopic approach was first used in 1992 by Cushieri7) and has been gaining widespread utility this past decade. In the thoracoscopic approach, a smaller wound is associated with a lesser degree of postoperative pain and based on a randomized controlled trial from the Netherlands, the incidence of postoperative respiratory complications were significantly reduced in patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy.8) However, operation durations were longer and several groups reported that postoperative complications requiring reoperation may be increased after thoracoscopic esophagectomy.911) The currently ongoing Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 1409 trial was initiated to clarify the non-inferiority of thoracoscopic esophagectomy against open thoracotomy12) by investigating the long term survival rate of patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy

In general, adjuvant chemotherapy may help eliminate residual cancer cell and micro metastasis. Because chemotherapy is preceded by surgery, patients with a high risk of cancer recurrence can be selected for therapy based on pathological findings of the surgical specimen. However, clinical response to this therapy cannot be evaluated as there is no observable lesion after curative surgery. Furthermore, a decreased dose intensity of chemotherapy might be required for postoperative morbid patients.13)

In Japan, the JCOG conducted sequential clinical trials to improve the survival for patients with ESCC (Table 1).2,12,1424) The survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in cStage II/III ESCC was investigated in the JCOG8503 study, where adjuvant radiotherapy (50 Gy) was compared with adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin (CDDP) and vindesin (VDS).15) The five year overall survival rate was 44% in the adjuvant radiotherapy group and 42% in the adjuvant chemotherapy group, indicating no difference in overall survival. At this time, because TTE with 3 FD was accepted as an effective surgical procedure in Japan, survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was compared with TTE alone. Consequently in the JCOG8806 study, adjuvant chemotherapy using CDDP and VDS combination was compared with surgery alone. The 5 year overall survival rate was 45% in the surgery group and 48% in the adjuvant chemotherapy group, and no survival benefit was achieved.16)

Table 1. Representative trials for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma which was conducted by Japan Clinical Oncology Group.

Study code Patient Study design Control Intervention

JCOG8201 Curatively resectable, SCC Phase III, superiority Neoadjuvant 30 Gy + Adjuvant 24 Gy Adjuvant 50 Gy
JCOG8503 Curatively resected, SCC Phase III, superiority Adjuvant 50 Gy Adjuvant CDDP + VDS
JCOG8806 Curatively resected, SCC Phase III, superiority Surgery alone Adjuvant CDDP + VDS
JCOG8807 Metastatic, SCC Phase II CDDP + 5-FU
JCOG8904 Small cell carcinoma Phase II CDDP + VP-16
JCOC9204 Curatively resected, SCC Phase III, superiority Surgery alone Adjuvant CDDP + 5-FU
JCOG9905-DI Metastatic, SCC Phase II Ned + 5-FU
JCOG9906 Stage II–III(non-T4), SCC Phase II CDDP + 5-FU + 60 Gy
JCOG9907 Stage II–III(non-T4), SCC Phase III, superiority Adjuvant CDDP + 5-FU Neoadjuvant CDDP + 5-FU
JCOG0303 T4 or unresectable LN, SCC Phase II/III, superiority CDDP + 5-FU + 50.4 Gy Low dose CDDP + 5-FU + 50.4 Gy
JCOG0807 Metastatic, SCC Phase I/II DTX + CDDP + 5-FU
JCOG0909 Stage II-III(non-T4), SCC Phase II CDDP + 5-FU + 50.4 Gy followed by salvage treatment
JCOG1109 Stage II-III(non-T4), SCC Phase III, superiority Neoadjuvant CDDP + 5-FU Arm 1. Neoadjuvant DTX + CDDP + 5-FU
        Arm 2. Neoadjuvant CDDP + 5-FU + 41.4 Gy
JCOG 1314 Metastatic, SCC Phase III, superiority CDDP + 5-FU DTX + CDDP + 5-FU

JCOG: Japan Clinical Oncology Group; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma; CDDP: cisplatin; VDS: vindesin; 5-FU: 5 fluorouracil; VP-16: etoposide; LN: lymph node; Ned: nedaplatin; DTX: docetaxel

In the 90’s, adjuvant chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and CDDP (CF) was compared with surgery alone in the JCOG9204 study.18) Consequently, the 5-year disease free survival was significantly extended in the CF chemotherapy group (55%) compared to the surgery alone group (45%). In subgroup analysis, the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was remarkable in patients with positive LN metastasis. Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy using CF could be a treatment option in Japan for patients with advanced esophageal cancer without neoadjuvant treatment and with positive LN metastasis after surgery.

In western society, Pouliquen reported a randomized control trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy using CF with surgery alone.25) In that study, no significant difference in survival was noted. Of interest, a meta-analysis conducted by Zhang concluded that indication of adjuvant treatment for ESCC might be determined according to pathological stage.26)

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

In general, there are several benefits of neoadjuvant treatment. First, neoadjuvant treatment can be delivered before surgery, leading to a high completion rate. Second, volume reduction of the primary tumor could lead to higher R0 rate, and control of micro metastasis might lead favorable prognosis. Third, response to chemotherapy can be evaluated based on the resected specimen, which may aid in selection of the postoperative treatment regimen. For non-responders however, tumor progression might result in a non-curative resection. Despite the benefits, it should be also noted that adverse events of neoadjuvant treatment might induce postoperative complications.

The JCOG9907 study in Japan compared the survival benefit of CF as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with CF as an adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable cStage II/III ESCC.2) In this study, the overall survival was significantly prolonged in the NAC group (p = 0.01) at the second interim analysis and patients’ accrual was stopped. Updated analyses showed that 5-year overall survival rate was 43% in adjuvant chemotherapy group and 55% in NAC group (p = 0.04). In terms of the postoperative complications, there was no remarkable difference in postoperative complications between the two groups. The mortality rate was less than 1%, with one patient in each group dying from surgery-related causes. Based on these results, NAC with CF followed by TTE with extended LN dissection has been the current standard treatment for patients with ESCC in Japan.

Table 22,2736) shows nine RCTs in which ESCC patients were included and the efficacy of NAC investigated that were reviewed. Besides the JCOG9907 trial, eight RCTs in which ESCC was included were reported, including seven from Western countries and one from Asia. Seven of these eight RCTs showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival between NAC followed by TTE and TTE alone. Sjoquist conducted a meta-analysis, using ten RCTs (Randomized control trial) for ESCC and esophageal adenocarcinoma to investigate the survival benefit of NAC.37) In the study, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) was 0.87 (0.79–0.96, p = 0.005) and indicated a survival benefit of NAC. However, a subgroup analysis by histological type for those studies where histology was available gave an HR of 0.91 (0.81–1.04, p = 0.18) for ESCC.

Table 2. Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone.

Author Treatment Histology n R0 resection rate (%) Mortality (%) MST (months) Survival rate (%) OS

Roth (1988) CDDP/VDS/BLM + Surgery + CDDP/VDS SCC 19 35 11 9 25 (3 year) NS
  Surgery alone   20 21 0 9 5 (3 year)  
Schlag (1992) 5-FU/CDDP + Surgery SCC 21 44 24 10 20 (1 year) NS
  Surgery alone   24 42 14 10 32 (1 year)  
Nygaard (1992) CDDP/BLM + Surgery SCC 56 44 15 NA 3 (3 year) NS
  Surgery alone   50 37 13 NA 9 (3 year)  
Maipang (1994) CDDP/VDS/BLM + Surgery SCC 24 NA 16.7 17 31 (3 year) NS
  Surgery alone   22 NA NA 17 36 (3 year)  
Law (1997) 5-FU/CDDP + Surgery SCC 74 67 8.3 17 44 (2 year) NS
  Surgery alone   73 35 8.7 13 31 (2 year)  
Kelsen (1998, 2007) 5-FU/CDDP + Surgery + 5-FU/CDDP AC/SCC 213 62 6 15 23 (3 year) NS
  Surgery alone   227 59 6 16 26 (3 year)  
Ancona (2001) 5-FU/CDDP + Surgery SCC 48 79 4.2 25 34 (5 year) NS
  Surgery alone   48 74 4.2 24 22 (5 year)  
MRC (2002) 5-FU/CDDP + Surgery AC/SCC 400 60 10 17 23 (5 year) p = 0.03
Allum (2009) Surgery alone   402 54 10 13 17 (5 year)  
JCOG9907 (2012) 5-FU/CDDP + Surgery SCC 166 96 0.6 NA 55 (5 year) p = 0.04
  Surgery + 5-FU/CDDP   164 91 0.6 NA 43 (5 year)  

MST: mean survival time; OS: overall survival; CDDP: cisplatin; VDS: vindesin; BLM: bleomysin; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma; NS: not significant; 5-FU: 5 fluorouracil; NA: not available; AC: adenocarcinoma; MRC: Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group; JCOG: Japan Clinical Oncology Group

In the subgroup analysis of the JCOG9907 trial, there was no significant difference in overall survival between NAC and surgery alone in patients with cStage III.2) Furthermore, in western countries, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) that shows higher efficacy in local control has been used as a standard treatment. Recently, Hara et al. reported a high response rate from triplet chemotherapy using CDDP, 5-FU, and docetaxel (DCF) and this could be another treatment option.38) In the phase II trial, treatment completion rate was 90.5% and clinical response rate was 64.3% and pathological complete response was observed in 17%. For adverse events, neutropenia (≥ Grade 3) was observed in 83% of patients but there were no cases of treatment related deaths.

From the current results, a three-arm phase III trial, JCOG1109 trial, was started in Japan to confirm the superiority of DCF over CF and the superiority of chemoradiotherapy with CF over CF as preoperative therapy for ESCC.23)

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

In NACRT, concurrent chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy less than 50 Gy is administered and curative surgery is planned after neoadjuvant treatment regardless of the response.14)

Table 3 1,29,3948) shows 12 RCTs in which patients with ESCC were included and efficacy of NACRT was investigated were reviewed. Despite differences in total radiotherapy dose and regimen of concurrent chemotherapy, most of the studies show an increase in the R0 resection rate in the NACRT group. Three of 12 trials showed significant overall survival benefit in the NACRT group. Van Hagen et al. investigated the superiority of NACRT using paclitaxel plus carboplatin with radiation of 41.4 Gy over surgery alone.1) Consequently, the median survival time was 24 months in the group with surgery alone against 49.4 months in the NACRT group, showing that NACRT significantly prolonged overall survival.1) The operative mortality rate was 3% in both groups in this trial. Shapiro et al. reported maintenance of the survival benefit in this trial in 2015.49) Sjoquist et al. conducted a meta-analysis of NACRT versus surgery alone and showed that the pooled HR for all-cause mortality for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 0.78 (0.70–0.88, p <0.0001), and the survival benefit was similar in both ESCC (HR 0.80, 0.68–0.93, p = 0.004) and adenocarcinoma (HR 0.75, 0.59–0.95, p = 0.02).37)

Table 3. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus surgery alone.

Author Treatment Histology n Resection rate (%) Mortality (%) MST (months) Survival rate (%) OS

Nygaard (1992) CDDP/BLM/35 Gy + Surgery SCC 53 55 (R0) 24 NA 23 (2 year) NS
  Surgery alone   50 37 (R0) 13 NA 13 (2 year)  
Apinop (1994) 5-FU/CDDP/40 Gy + Surgery SCC 35 NA 14 10 26 (3 year) NS
  Surgery alone   34 NA 15 7 20 (3 year)  
Le Prise (1994) 5-FU/CDDP/20 Gy + Surgery SCC 41 85 (R0) 9 11 19 (3 year) NS
  Surgery alone   45 84 (R0) 7 11 14 (3 year)  
Bosset (1997) CDDP/37 Gy + Surgery SCC 143 81 (R0) 12 19 39 (3 year) NS
  Surgery alone   139 69 (R0) 4 19 37 (3 year)  
Urba (2001) 5-FU/CDDP/VBL/45 Gy + Surgery AC/SCC 50 90 (R0) 2 17 30 (3 year) NS
  Surgery alone   50 90 (R0) 4 18 16 (3 year)  
Lee (2004) 5-FU/CDDP/46 Gy + Surgery SCC 51 69 (R0) 2 28 55 (2 year) NS
  Surgery alone   50 84 (R0) 2 27 57 (2 year)  
Burmeister (2005) 5-FU/CDDP/35 Gy + Surgery AC/SCC 128 80 (R0) 5 22 NA NS
  Surgery alone   128 59 (R0) 5 19 NA  
Natsugoe (2006) 5-FU/CDDP/40 Gy + Surgery SCC 22 NA 5 NA 57 (5year) NS
  Surgery alone   23 NA 0 NA 41 (5 year)  
Tepper (2008) 5-FU/CDDP/50.4 Gy + Surgery AC/SCC 30 86 0 54 39 (5 year) p = 0.002
  Surgery alone   26 88 4 22 16 (5 year)  
Lv (2010) PTX/CDDP/41.4 Gy + Surgery SCC 80 97 (R0) 3.8 53 44 (5 year) p = 0.005
  Surgery alone   80 80 (R0) 0 36 34 (5 year)  
Van Hagen (2012) 5-FU/CDDP/45 Gy + Surgery AC/SCC 98 94 (R0) 11.1 32 41 (5 year) NS
  Surgery alone   97 92 (R0) 3.4 41 34 (5 year)  
Mariette (2014) PTX/CBDCA/41.4 Gy + Surgery AC/SCC 175 92 (R0) 3.4 49 59 (3 year) p = 0.003
  Surgery alone   188 69 (R0) 3.8 24 44 (3 year)  

MST: mean survival time; OS: overall survival; CDDP: cisplatin; BLM: bleomysin; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma; NS: not significant; 5-FU: 5 fluorouracil; NA: not available; VL: vinblastine; AC: adenocarcinoma; PTX: paclitaxel; CBDCA: carboplatin

To date, there has been no RCT comparing NAC and NACRT in patients with ESCC. The JCOG1109 trial could encourage establishment of a standardized multidisciplinary treatment for ESCC.23)

Definitive Chemoradiotherapy

Although surgery has been recognized as an initial curative treatment for esophageal cancer, the TTE is invasive and the mortality and morbidity remains high. In patients who are unable to undergo thoracotomy or who decline to undergo surgery, definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) can be an alternative to esophagectomy. One of the curative treatment options is dCRT in which a total radiation dose of >50 Gy is combined with concurrent chemotherapy.

There were three previous randomized phase III trials which compared esophagectomy with dCRT. In the FFCD9102 study, all patients received chemoradiotherapy and patients who responded to the treatment with no contraindication were randomly assigned to surgery or continuation of chemoradiotherapy.50) Consequently, there was no significant difference in the 2 year survival rate (Surgery group, 34%; Chemoradiotherapy group, 40%) and the 3-month mortality was 9.3% in the surgery group. Similar to the FFCD9102 study, the other two RCTs reported no significant difference in survival as well.51,52)

To date, there are nine observational studies comparing dCRT with surgery.5361) Of them, five reports were submitted from Japan and in two out of nine studies, surgery was shown to significantly extend the overall survival. Consequently, dCRT has been used as an alternative to surgery in patients unable to undergo surgical treatment.

When dCRT was selected as the initial treatment with a total radiation dose of >50 Gy, salvage esophagectomy, particularly TTE, could be a treatment option. In the ongoing JCOG0909 trial for patients who refuse to undergo TTE, dCRT is conducted as the initial treatment, and salvage treatments, including TTE or endoscopic submucosal resection for residual disease or early local recurrence, are planned. In this trial, on the basis of the previous studies,62,63) the radiation protocol was set at 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions using the CT simulator with a three- or four-field technique to reduce the late radiation toxicities. Because clinical target volume was modified depending on the tumor location, the radiation field in the JCOG0909 trial was smaller than in the JCOG9906 trial.

As a future perspective, the aforementioned treatment strategy might be an ideal treatment option for patients with cStage II/III ESCC.

Conclusions

Although the advancement of multidisciplinary treatment has improved survival in patients with ESCC, the recurrence rate has been still high, particularly in locally advanced cases. Furthermore, one of the challenging issues is that there are various combinations of treatments in the world, resulting in that the current standard treatment is country dependent. As a future perspective, the ongoing Japanese trial could indicate whether the more intense neoadjuvant treatment would extend the postoperative survival in patients with resectable ESCC, particularly for clinical stage III. In patients with surgically unresectable ESCC, triplet chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy may increase the response rate, which will enable more patients to undergo curative surgery. Recently, the effectiveness of new therapeutic agents, which include immune check point inhibitors, has been reported.64) Further improvement with multidisciplinary treatment for ESCC encourages the establishment of a standardized treatment for ESCC across various countries.

Disclosure Statement

Yuko Kitagawa received a research grant from Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd. Other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1).van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Eng J Med 2012; 366: 2074-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2).Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 68-74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3).Takeuchi H, Fujii H, Ando N, et al. Validation study of radio-guided sentinel lymph node navigation in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 2009; 249: 757-63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4).Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y, et al. Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 225-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5).Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, et al. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 1994; 220: 364-72; discussion 372-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6).Udagawa H, Ueno M, Shinohara H, et al. The importance of grouping of lymph node stations and rationale of three-field lymphoadenectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2012; 106: 742-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7).Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesop­hagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992; 37: 7-11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8).Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1887-92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9).Nozaki I, Kato K, Igaki H, et al. Evaluation of safety profile of thoracoscopic esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 cancer using data from JCOG0502: a prospective multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 3519-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10).Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg 2014; 260: 259-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11).Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, et al. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 197-203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12).Kataoka K, Takeuchi H, Mizusawa J, et al. A randomized Phase III trial of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1409. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2016; 46: 174-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13).Ando N, Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy. In: Ando N. ed.; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. New York: Springer, 2015; pp 177-96. [Google Scholar]
  • 14).Iizuka T, Ide H, Kakegawa T, et al. Preoperative radioactive therapy for esophageal carcinoma: randomized evaluation trial in eight institutions. Chest 1988; 93: 1054-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15).Japanese Esophageal Oncology Group A comparison of chemotherapy and radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment to surgery for esophageal carcinoma. Chest 1993; 104: 203-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16).Ando N, Iizuka T, Kakegawa T, et al. A randomized trial of surgery with and without chemotherapy for localized squamous carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study. J Thorac Cardiovas Surg 1997; 114: 205-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17).Iizuka T, Kakegawa T, Ide H, et al. Phase II evaluation of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a Japanese Esophageal Oncology Group Trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1992; 22: 172-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18).Ando N, Iizuka T, Ide H, et al. Surgery plus chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study—JCOG9204. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 4592-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19).Kato K, Muro K, Ando N, et al. A phase II study of nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil in metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) Trial (JCOG 9905-DI). Esophagus 2014; 11: 183-8. [Google Scholar]
  • 20).Kato K, Muro K, Minashi K, et al. Phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for Stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: JCOG trial (JCOG 9906). Int J Rad Oncol Bio Phys 2011; 81: 684-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21).Shinoda M, Ando N, Kato K, et al. Randomized study of low-dose versus standard-dose chemoradiotherapy for unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (JCOG0303). Cancer Sci 2015; 106: 407-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22).Hironaka S, Tsubosa Y, Mizusawa J, et al. Phase I/II trial of 2-weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil in metastatic esophageal cancer (JCOG0807). Cancer Sci 2014; 105: 1189-95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23).Nakamura K, Kato K, Igaki H, et al. Three-arm phase III trial comparing cisplatin plus 5-FU (CF) versus docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-FU (DCF) versus radiotherapy with CF (CF-RT) as preoperative therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer (JCOG1109, NExT study). Jpn J Clin Oncol 2013; 43: 752-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24).Kataoka K, Tsushima T, Mizusawa J, et al. A randomized controlled Phase III trial comparing 2-weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil (2-weekly DCF) with cisplatin plus fluorouracil (CF) in patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal cancer: rationale, design and methods of Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1314 (MIRACLE study). Jpn J Clin Oncol 2015; 45: 494-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25).Pouliquen X, Levard H, Hay JM, et al. 5-Fluorouracil and cisplatin therapy after palliative surgical resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. A multicenter randomized trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Ann Surg 1996; 223: 127-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26).Zhang SS, Yang H, Xie X, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies. Dis Esophagus 2014; 27: 574-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27).Roth JA, Pass HI, Flanagan MM, et al. Randomized clinical trial of preoperative and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, vindesine, and bleomycin for carcinoma of the esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovas Surg 1988; 96: 242-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28).Schlag PM. Randomized trial of preoperative chemotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the esophagus. Arch Surg 1992; 127: 1446-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29).Nygaard K, Hagen S, Hansen HS, et al. Pre-operative radiotherapy prolongs survival in operable esophageal carcinoma: a randomized, multicenter study of pre-operative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. World J Surg 1992; 16: 1104-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30).Maipang T, Vasinanukorn P, Petpichetchian C, et al. Induction chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. J Surg Oncol 1994; 56: 191-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31).Law S, Fok M, Chow S, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovas Surg 1997; 114: 210-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32).Kelsen DP, Ginsberg R, Pajak TF, et al. Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer. N Eng J Med 1998; 339: 1979-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33).Kelsen DP, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, et al. Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3719-25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34).Ancona E, Ruol A, Santi S, et al. Only pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves significantly the long term survival of patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: final report of a randomized, controlled trial of preoperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone. Cancer 2001; 91: 2165-74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35).Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Worling Group Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 1727-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36).Allum WH, Stenning SP, Bancewicz J, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5062-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37).Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, et al. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 681-92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38).Hara H, Tahara M, Daiko H, et al. Phase II feasibility study of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci 2013; 104: 1455-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39).Apinop C, Puttisak P, Preecha N. A prospective study of combined therapy in esophageal cancer. Gastroenterol Hepatol 1994; 41: 391-3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40).Le Prise E, Etienne PL, Meunier B, et al. A randomized study of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery versus surgery for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer 1994; 73: 1779-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41).Bosset JF, Gignoux M, Triboulet JP, et al. Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus. N Eng J Med 1997; 337: 161-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42).Urba SG, Orringer MB, Turrisi A, et al. Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 305-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43).Lee JL, Park SI, Kim SB, et al. A single institutional phase III trial of preoperative chemotherapy with hyperfractionation radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 947-54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44).Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Gebski V, et al. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 659-68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45).Natsugoe S, Okumura H, Matsumoto M, et al. Randomized controlled study on preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for esophageal squamous cell cancer in a single institution. Dis Esophagus 2006; 19: 468-72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46).Tepper J, Krasna MJ, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 1086-92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47).Lv J, Cao XF, Zhu B, et al. Long-term efficacy of perioperative chemoradiotherapy on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 1649-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48).Mariette C, Dahan L, Mornex F, et al. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage I and II esophageal cancer: final analysis of randomized controlled phase III trial FFCD 9901. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 2416-22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49).Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 1090-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50).Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouche O, et al. Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 1160-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51).Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, et al. Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2310-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52).Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Yeung WK, et al. Long-term survival outcomes after definitive chemoradiation versus surgery in patients with resectable squamous carcinoma of the esophagus: results from a randomized controlled trial. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: 165-71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53).Chan R, Morrill S, Freeman D, et al. Bi-modality (chemo-radiation) versus tri-modality (chemo-radiation followed by surgery) treatment for carcinoma of the esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2001; 14: 202-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54).Hironaka S, Ohtsu A, Boku N, et al. Nonrandomized comparison between definitive chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery in patients with T(2-3)N(any) M(0) squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Rad Oncol Bio Phys 2003; 57: 425-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55).Nagata M, Yamamoto H, Takiguchi N, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy in resectable stage II/III (T1-3N0, 1M0) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Esophagus 2006; 3: 105-11. [Google Scholar]
  • 56).Adams R, Morgan M, Mukherjee S, et al. A prospective comparison of multidisciplinary treatment of oesophageal cancer with curative intent in a UK cancer network. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33: 307-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57).Hsu FM, Lin CC, Lee JM, et al. Improved local control by surgery and paclitaxel-based chemoradiation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results of a retrospective non-randomized study. J Surg Oncol 2008; 98: 34-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58).Yamashita H, Nakagawa K, Yamada K, et al. A single institutional non-randomized retrospective comparison between definitive chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery in 82 Japanese patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dis Esophagus 2008; 21: 430-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59).Abrams JA, Buono DL, Strauss J, et al. Esophagectomy compared with chemoradiation for early stage esophageal cancer in the elderly. Cancer 2009; 115: 4924-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60).Ariga H, Nemoto K, Miyazaki S, et al. Prospective comparison of surgery alone and chemoradiotherapy with selective surgery in resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Rad Oncol Bio Phys 2009; 75: 348-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61).Matsuda S, Tsubosa Y, Niihara M, et al. Comparison of transthoracic esophagectomy with definitive chemoradiotherapy as initial treatment for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who could tolerate transthoracic esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22: 1866-73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62).Kato K, Nakajima TE, Ito Y, et al. Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy at the dose of 50.4 Gy with elective nodal irradiation for Stage II-III esophageal carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2013; 43: 608-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63).Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, Pisansky TM, Martenson J, Komaki R, et al. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1167-74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64).Lote H, Cafferkey C, Chau I. PD-1 and PD-L1 blockade in gastrointestinal malignancies. Cancer Treat Rev 2015; 41: 893-903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery are provided here courtesy of Japanese Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (ATCS)

RESOURCES