Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2016 May 23;174(5):730–747. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14116

Efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alpha in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Sophie Park 1,✉, Pierre Fenaux 2, Peter Greenberg 3, Bhakti Mehta 4, Fiona Callaghan 5, Christopher Kim 4, Dianne Tomita 4, Hairong Xu 4
PMCID: PMC5089656  PMID: 27214305

Summary

We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to estimate the efficacy of darbepoetin alpha (DA) for treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)‐related anaemia. Eligible studies were prospective, interventional, and reported World Health Organization, French‐American‐British, or International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) criteria. Outcomes included erythroid response rate (primary); haemoglobin response; change in haemoglobin, transfusion status, and quality‐of‐life (QoL); and safety. Ten studies (N = 647) were analysed. Erythroid response rate range was 38–72%; median response duration range was 12–51+ months. Patients with erythropoietin (EPO) <100 iu/l had 35% [95% confidence interval (CI): 22–48%; P < 0·001) better response than patients with EPO >100 iu/l. Erythropoesis‐stimulating agent (ESA)‐naïve patients had 17% (95% CI: 3–32%; P = 0·022) greater response rate than those previously treated with ESA. Nonetheless, previously treated patients had response rates of 25–75%. Higher baseline haemoglobin levels, higher dose, transfusion‐independence and low‐risk IPSS status were reported by several studies to be associated with better response. QoL, transfusion rates and haemoglobin levels improved with treatment. Hypertension, thromboembolism and progression to acute myeloid leukaemia were reported in 2%, 1% and 1% of patients, respectively. This meta‐analysis suggests that DA treatment can be useful for improving erythroid response in MDS patients with anaemia, even among patients previously treated with ESA.

Keywords: darbepoetin alpha, myelodysplastic syndromes, systematic review, meta‐analysis

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of heterogeneous disorders characterized by one or more peripheral blood cytopenias that originate in dysfunctional clonal bone marrow stem cells with abnormal proliferation and differentiation. The incidence rate of MDS is estimated to be 5·3–13·1 cases per 100 000 people worldwide (Cogle, 2015). Patients with MDS often progress to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), particularly patients with high‐risk MDS (Steensma & Bennett, 2006). Patients are most commonly stratified into risk categories using the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) based on percentage of blasts, number of cytopenias and cytogenetics. The primary objectives of treatment in patients with low‐ or intermediate‐risk MDS are to treat the anaemia resulting from disease, reduce transfusions, improve quality of life (QoL) and prevent progression to AML or other higher‐risk disease (Garcia‐Manero, 2014).

Anaemia is a major burden for MDS patients and is associated with fatigue, weakness and shortness of breath. The symptoms of anaemia may be temporarily improved by red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, but there are safety concerns associated with repeated transfusions (Greenberg et al, 2013). Anaemia leading to transfusion dependency and iron overload is commonly observed in patients diagnosed with MDS. Transfusion dependency and iron overload have been associated with shorter survival and worse clinical outcomes among patients with MDS, including cardiac, hepatic, and endocrine dysfunction (Greenberg et al, 2013). Prevention of transfusion‐related events for MDS patients can have a substantial effect on survival, which varies by risk stratification: median survival in low‐risk patients can exceed 3 years and in high‐risk patients can be as low as 2 months (Garcia‐Manero, 2014).

Erythropoesis‐stimulating agents (ESAs) have been used to treat anaemic MDS patients in clinical practice to reduce the risk of RBC transfusion (Sekeres et al, 2008). Two retrospective studies (Spiriti et al, 2005; Park et al, 2010) and one prospective study (Greenberg et al, 2009) have suggested that use of ESA rather than transfusions improved the overall survival of MDS patients. Additionally, longer survival times have been reported in MDS patients with ESA therapy than without (Jadersten et al, 2008; Park et al, 2008).

Previous reviews reported on studies that used short‐acting epoetin alpha (EA) to treat MDS‐related anaemia (Ross et al, 2007; Moyo et al, 2008), but these reviews focused on EA and included few studies assessing long‐lasting darbepoetin alpha (DA). The number of studies that have assessed DA use has increased (Gabrilove et al, 2008; Gotlib et al, 2009; Oliva et al, 2010; Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011; Villegas et al, 2011; Kelaidi et al, 2013a; Jang et al, 2015). Studies have demonstrated efficacy and a safe profile with few reported adverse events (AEs) (Kelaidi & Fenaux, 2010); however, to our knowledge no meta‐analysis or systematic review has been conducted on these DA studies.

Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the use of DA as supportive care to treat anaemia in patients with MDS. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the erythroid response rate in MDS patients receiving DA. We also examined the response rate by baseline erythropoietin levels, DA dose, response measurement timing and transfusion history.

Methods

Literature search and data extraction

The literature search was performed by two professional independent librarians using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, BIOSIS Previews and the Current Contents/all editions for papers published until August 2015. A range of MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms and key words were used to search the relevant databases (Data S1). Additional searches of conference proceedings were conducted for the American Society of Hematology (ASH), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), MDS Foundation, European Haematology Association (EHA), International Symposium on Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Titles and abstracts of identified studies were evaluated to determine if they met eligibility criteria. Full articles were obtained and screened manually for confirmation. A manual check of the reference lists of all accepted papers and recent reviews was also performed to supplement the electronic searches described above. Screening and evaluation were conducted independently by two reviewers with resolution of disagreement by consensus or adjudication by a third reviewer. To avoid review of duplicate reports of the same study, this analysis used the most complete publication, or the most recent of multiple publications using the same patient population.

Publications were extracted if the following inclusion criteria were met: (i) prospective interventional study design of MDS patients treated with DA; (ii) at least 10 adult patients with MDS reporting either World Health Organization (WHO), French‐American‐British (FAB) criteria or IPSS status; (iii) reported at least one of the following outcomes: number and proportion of patients with erythroid response, haemoglobin change, RBC transfusions (pre‐ and post‐treatment), QoL using validated instruments [e.g., the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT), as pre‐ and post‐treatment scores or change scores], or the utilization of health resources; (iv) publication written in English, or studies reported in languages other than English with the relevant data for the analysis available from the abstract; and (v) published since 1980. Studies were excluded they if they were: (i) animal or in vitro studies; (ii) case reports, letters, news, editorials, or reviews; or (iii) study populations of other malignancies.

Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and entered into a pre‐designed data extraction form. Disagreement was resolved through discussion until consensus was achieved. Information regarding the study design and outcomes of interest were collected. In the extraction of safety data, a zero number of events was recorded only where there was a clear statement in the original study that a particular event did not occur; when no mention of an event was made, the data were treated as missing and not included in the analyses.

Analytical approach

The primary endpoint of interest of this study was the international Working Group (IWG) 2000 erythroid response rate in MDS patients receiving DA (Cheson et al, 2000), as this outcome was more commonly reported than the IWG 2006 response definition (Cheson et al, 2006) over the time period of the systematic review. Other endpoints analysed descriptively included: change in the number of units and percentage of RBC transfusions from baseline; time to response; duration of response; change in QoL measures from baseline; and numbers and percentages of AEs.

We evaluated clinical and methodological heterogeneity with respect to the study population [e.g., MDS subtype, baseline clinical characteristics including serum erythropoietin (EPO) level], participant selection method (e.g., inclusion/exclusion criteria), intervention or treatment evaluated [e.g., DA dosing regimen, addition of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF)], outcome measurements (e.g., definition of erythroid response) and analysis methods. Additional visual inspection of forest plots and statistical methods, such as the I 2 statistic (Higgins & Thompson, 2002) and Cochran's Q statistic (Hedges & Olkin, 1985), were used to assess the heterogeneity across studies and assist in the decision as to how to proceed with data synthesis. Throughout the analyses, estimates were only combined using formal meta‐analytical techniques when it was warranted, based on sample size or tests of homogeneity; otherwise results were reported descriptively or graphically only.

Publication bias (the potential for non‐significant studies to go unpublished, thereby skewing the published results toward a more favourable conclusion) was evaluated graphically using a funnel plot where proportion of response was compared against within‐study variation for each study. If no publication bias exists, a balanced scatter around the true response rate forming a triangular ‘funnel’ shape is seen, with greater variation for smaller (high‐variation) studies and less variation for larger studies. If publication bias exists, there is a tendency for negative studies to be missing (particularly the negative, small, high‐variation studies) resulting in an asymmetrical shape.

Meta‐analysis

A formal meta‐analysis was performed to estimate the erythroid response rate based on studies using IWG 2000 response definitions, although the results from studies with other response definitions were included descriptively. Furthermore, we chose outcomes that were assessed at 12–24 weeks after the initiation of treatment, taking the earliest response reported within that window when responses at multiple time points were reported for the same study. A formal meta‐analysis was not performed for other outcomes of interest.

Where combined estimates were warranted, we used random effects models based on a restricted maximum‐likelihood estimator (Raudenbush, 2009) for combined estimates and meta‐regression. All confidence intervals (CIs) for single studies were based on the asymptotic CI for a single proportion (Newcombe, 1998). For the two‐sample subgroup analyses, we used the absolute difference in response as the outcome measure because the response rate difference between the subgroups was the quantity of clinical interest. As a sensitivity analysis, we also compared subgroups using the log odds ratio. All statistical analyses were performed using the package ‘metafor’ (Viechtbauer, 2010) in the statistical software R (Venables & Smith, 2015).

Results

A total of 173 references were identified, of which 41 references were considered potentially relevant based on the abstracts according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria (Fig 1). Full texts of these articles were reviewed and 10 studies (N = 647 patients) were confirmed to meet the eligibility criteria (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Flow chart of literature search results and study selection. ASCO, American Society of Clinical Oncology; ASH, American Society of Hematology; MASCC, Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer; ESMO, European Society for Medical Oncology; EHA, European Haematology Association.

Table 1.

Studiesa, baseline clinical characteristics, MDS assessment criteria, and treatment in published studies

Study (N enrolled/N evaluated) MDS assessment Baseline clinical characteristics Treatment history
FAB, n (%) WHO, n (%) IPSS, n (%) Time from diagnosis to treatment, months Haemoglobin, g/l Serum EPO, iu/l ESA TDb, n (%)
Musto et al (2005)
(37/37) 		NA RA: 11 (29·7)
RARS: 3 (8·1)
RCMD: 12 (32·4)
RCMD‐RS: 2 (5·4)
RAEB: 8 (21·6)
5q‐: 1 (2·7) 		Low: 16 (43·2)
INT‐1: 17 (45·9)
INT‐2: 4 (10·8) 		Mean (SD):
30·4 (43·8)
Median: 20
Range: 1–240 		Mean (SD):
82 (12)
Median: 84
Range: 55–107 		Mean (SD):
303·1 (438·7)
Median: 109 Range: 19–2000 		Eight patients received rEPO for ≥12 weeks 23 (62)
Stasi et al (2005)
(53/53) 		Not stated RA: 31 (58·5),
RCMD: 10 (18·9)
RAEB‐1: 8 (15·1)
RARS: 3 (5·7)
RCMD‐RS: 1 (1·9) 		Low: 29 (54·7)
INT‐1: 24 (45·3) 		Nonresponders:
Median: 16 Range: 9–21
Responders: Median: 15·5
Range: 9–21 		Median: 79
Range: 68–93 		Median: 171
Range: 26–515 		No 46 (86·8)
Mannone et al (2006)
(66/62) 		RA: 22 (35·5)
RAEB: 18 (29·0)
RARS: 20 (32·3)
CMML: 2 (3·2) 		RA: 11 (17·7)
RCMD: 8 (12·9)
RARS: 18 (29·0)
RCMD‐RS: 2 (3·2)
RAEB‐1: 18 (29·0)
5q‐: 3 (4·8)
CMML1: 2 (3·2) 		Low: 16 (25·8)
INT‐1: 26 (41·9)
INT‐2: 8 (12·9)
Missing: 12 (19·4) 		Median: 10
Range: 0–124 		<100
(mean/median not provided) 		Median: 67
Range: 6–487 		Yes; 13 patients with failure of rEPO treatment before inclusion 41 (66·1)
Gabrilove et al (2008)
(209/206) 		RA: 119 (57·8)
RARS: 73 (35·4)
RAEB: 13 (6·3)
Missing: 1 (0·5) 		NA Low: 138 (67·0),
INT‐1: 58 (28·2)
Missing: 10 (4·9) 		NA Mean (SD):
98 (10)
ESA‐naïve:
97 (10)
ESA‐treated:
100 (11) 		<100: n = 137
100–500: n = 43
≥500: n = 21
Missing: n = 5
Median: 58·1 Range: 12–4643 		ESA‐naïve: 144
ESA previously treated: 62 		9 (4·4)
Gotlib et al (2009)
(24/24) 		RA: 10 (41·7)
RARS: 9 (37·5)
CMML: 2 (8·3)
RAEB: 3 (12·5) 		RCMD: 8 (33·3)
RCMD‐RS: 9 (37·5)
5q‐: 2 (8·3)
CMML‐1: 2 (8·3)
RAEB‐1: 3 (12·5) 		Low: 12 (50)
INT‐1: 10 (41·7)
INT‐2: 2 (8·3) 		NA Mean (SD):
92 (9)
Median: 93
Range: 71–108 		Mean (SD): 241·5 (505·5)
Median: 111
Range: 12–2556 		Yes; rEPO‐naïve or EPO tx ≤40,000 units/week for ≤4 weeks 16 (66·7)
Oliva et al (2010)
(41/40)c 		NA RA: 24 (59)
RCMD: 11 (27)
RARS: 2 (5)
RAEB1: 1 (2)
5q‐: 2 (5)
MDS‐U: 1 (2) 		Low: 29 (71)
INT‐1: 12 (29) 		Mean (SD):
25 (28) 		Mean (SD):
90 (10) 		Mean (SD):
113 (108) 		Patients on rEPO within 6 mos before enrollment excluded; 12 patients resistant to prior rEPO alpha at adequate dose 17 (41·5)
Nilsson‐Ehle et al (2011)
(36/30)d 		NA RA: 6 (16·7)
RARS: 8 (22·2)
RCMD: 12 (33·3)
RAEB: 5 (13·9)
5q‐: 3 (8·3)
MDS‐U: 1 (2·8)
CMML: 1 (2·8) 		Low: 14 (38·9)
INT‐1: 12 (33·3)
INT‐2: 3 (8·3)
Not performed: 7 (19·4) 		Median: 3·6
Range: 0–197 		Mean (SD):
93 (11·3)
Median: 91·5
Range: 74–127 		NA Patients on EPO within 8 weeks prior to study excluded 17 (47·2)
Villegas et al (2011)
(44/43) 		RA: 14 (31·8)
RARS: 27 (61·4)
RAEB: 3 (6·8) 		Not stated Low: 34 (77·3)
INT‐1: 10 (22·7) 		NA Mean (SD):
92 (8) 		Mean (SD):
120·7 (122·5) 		Patients on EPO within 4 weeks before entry excluded 12 (27)
Kelaidi et al (2013a)
(99/95) 		NA RA: 24 (25)
RARS: 31 (33)
RCMD: 15 (16)
RCMD‐RS: 7 (7)
5q‐: 2 (2)
RAEB‐1: 14 (15)
CMML: 2 (2) 		Low: 51 (54)
INT‐1: 44 (46) 		NA Median: 92
Range: 62–100 		Median: 60
Range: 3–461 		Patients on ESA in previous 8 weeks excluded 44 (46)
Jang et al (2015)
(52/50) 		RA: 33 (63·5)
RARS: 14 (26·9)
RAEB: 5 (9·6) 		RARS: 4 (7·7)
RCMD: 31 (59·6)
RAEB‐1: 5 (9·6)
5q‐: 2 (3·8)
RCUD: 4 (7·7)
MDS‐U: 6 (11·5) 		Low: 9 (17·3)
INT‐1: 43 (82·7) 		NA Mean (SD):
79·2 (9·1) 		Mean (SD): 221 (134) NA 52 (100)
Open in a new tab

CMML, chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia; EPO, erythropoietin; ESA, erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent; FAB, French‐American‐British; INT, intermediate; IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System; MDS, Myelodysplastic syndromes; MDS‐U, Myelodysplastic syndrome – unclassifiable; NA, not available; RA, refractory anaemia; RAEB, refractory anaemia with excess blasts; RARS, refractory anaemia with ring sideroblasts; RCMD, refractory cytopenias with multilineage dysplasia; RCMD‐RS, refractory cytopenias with multilineage dysplasia and ring sideroblasts; RCUD, refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia; rEPO, recombinant erythropoietin; SD, standard deviation; TD, transfusion dependent; tx, treatment; WHO, World Health Organization.

a

All studies were phase II, single‐arm, except for Musto et al (2005) (pilot study) and Jang et al (2015) (randomized controlled trial).

b

Transfusion dependence was defined as ≥1 transfusion per month.

c

Based on intent‐to‐treat sample N = 41: information on the WHO or IPSS status of the patient that left the study was not available so percentages cannot be updated for N = 40.

d

N = 30 at 16 weeks. Although the study was a 24‐week study and 27 patients completed the study, the study protocol changed after week 16 so that nonresponding patients received transfusions.

Clinical and methodological characteristics of published studies

Nine of ten studies that met the inclusion criteria were single‐arm phase II studies (Musto et al, 2005; Stasi et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Gabrilove et al, 2008; Gotlib et al, 2009; Oliva et al, 2010; Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011; Villegas et al, 2011; Kelaidi et al, 2013a), and one study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (Jang et al, 2015) that evaluated the response rate across different DA doses. When evaluating the effect of dose on response, the response rates from the three dose arms reported by Jang et al (2015) were entered into the analysis separately; for the rest of the analysis, the response rates, safety events and other outcomes from all three arms were combined. Despite the inclusion of a range of WHO or FAB classifications, most studies enrolled patients with low‐risk or intermediate‐1 IPSS risk only, with a few studies including a small proportion of patients with intermediate‐2 IPSS risk (Musto et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Gotlib et al, 2009; Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011). Most studies clearly stated that patients with other causes of anaemia were excluded (Stasi et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Gabrilove et al, 2008; Oliva et al, 2010; Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011; Villegas et al, 2011; Kelaidi et al, 2013a).

Baseline patient clinical characteristics of the original studies are summarized in Table 1. All but one of the studies (Mannone et al, 2006) reported either mean or median baseline haemoglobin levels (range of median levels: 79–93 g/l; range of mean levels: 79–98 g/l) and all studies except one (Musto et al, 2005) stated that patients were at or below a threshold haemoglobin level for inclusion. All studies except one (Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011) reported baseline serum EPO levels (range of median EPO levels: 58·1–171 iu/l; range of mean EPO levels: 113–221·1 iu/l) (Musto et al, 2005; Stasi et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Gabrilove et al, 2008; Gotlib et al, 2009; Oliva et al, 2010; Villegas et al, 2011; Kelaidi et al, 2013a; Jang et al, 2015). The duration of time from MDS diagnosis to enrolment ranged from 3·6 to 20 months (both mean and median) for the five studies that reported duration (Musto et al, 2005; Stasi et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Oliva et al, 2010; Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011). Most studies either excluded patients with previous ESA exposure (Stasi et al, 2005), or excluded patients who had received EPO within 1–6 months of the start of the study (Gotlib et al, 2009; Oliva et al, 2010; Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011; Villegas et al, 2011; Kelaidi et al, 2013a). All of the studies included some transfusion‐dependent patients (range 4–100%), although the definition of transfusion dependency varied slightly across studies.

Although treatment regimens varied, there were many commonalities (Table 2). Seven of the ten studies had an initial fixed‐dose regimen that was administered once weekly (QW), with doses ranging from 60 to 300 μg (Musto et al, 2005; Stasi et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Oliva et al, 2010; Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011; Villegas et al, 2011; Jang et al, 2015). Two studies treated patients with an initial dose of 500 μg every 2 weeks (Q2W) (Kelaidi et al, 2013a) or 3 weeks (Q3W) (Gabrilove et al, 2008). One study administered a weight‐based dose QW (Gotlib et al, 2009). Nine of the ten studies increased the initial dose, the frequency of dosing or added G‐CSF when minor response or non‐response was observed (Stasi et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Gabrilove et al, 2008; Gotlib et al, 2009; Oliva et al, 2010; Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011; Villegas et al, 2011; Kelaidi et al, 2013a; Jang et al, 2015). Two studies added G‐CSF to the treatment regimen for patients with refractory anaemia with ringed sideroblasts (RARS) from week 1 (Gotlib et al, 2009; Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011), and four studies added G‐CSF to the regimen after poor response at 8–12 weeks (Mannone et al, 2006; Gotlib et al, 2009; Villegas et al, 2011; Kelaidi et al, 2013a). In total, nine studies reported IWG 2000 results at 12–24 weeks, with total treatment periods ranging from 12 to 52 weeks. Five studies reported median follow‐up ranging from 9 to 52 months (Stasi et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Villegas et al, 2011; Kelaidi et al, 2013a; Jang et al, 2015).

Table 2.

DA treatment characteristics and erythroid response rates in published studies

Study Treatment Response criteria Treatment period Follow‐up Median (range) Response rate assessment, N (%)a Time to response Median (range) Duration of response
Week 8 Week 12 Week 16 Week 24 Other
Musto et al (2005) 150 μg QW for ≥12 weeks IWG 2000c 12 weeks NA NA 15 (41)
MaR: 13 (35)
MiR: 2 (5) 		NA NA NA 9 weeks
(2–11) 		13 patients had stable Hb after 7–22 months
Stasi et al (2005) 150 μg QW; increased to 300 μg if no/suboptimal response by week 12; dose adjusted to maintain Hb 110–130 g/l if Hb >130 g/l IWG 2000 24 weeks (primary) 9·4 mos – 20 (38)
MaR: 20 (38)
MiR: 0 (0) 		– 24 (45)
MaR: 21 (40)
MiR: 3 (6) 		– NA Median: NE
(95% CI: 51–NE)
Mannone et al (2006) 300 μg/week for 12 weeks; DA+G‐CSF for patients without response after week 12; withheld DA until Hb <130 g/l and maintained Hb 110–130 g/l IWG 2000 24 weeks 40 weeks (4–84) NA 44 (71)
MaR: 34 (55)
MiR: 10 (16) 		NA 46 (74)
MaR: 35 (56)
MiR: 11 (18) 		NA 4 weeks
(4–12) 		NA
Gabrilove et al (2008) 500 μg Q3W, increased to 500 μg Q2W at week 7 if no response; dose reduced to 300 μg if increase >100 g/l in any 2‐week period; DA withheld for patients with Hb ≥130 g/l until decreased to ≤120 g/l IWG 2000 (primary)
IWG 2006d (week 53/55 only) 		‘Test’ period: week 13
Treatment period: 27/28 weeks
Extended period: 52 weeks 		NA NA NA NA NA 13 week:
ESA‐naïve: 102 (71)
MaR: 71 (49)
MiR: 31 (22)
ESA‐treated:
27 (44)
MaR: 16 (26)
MiR: 11 (18)
53/55 week:
ESA‐naïve: 107 (74)
MaR: 85 (59)
MiR: 22 (15)
ESA‐treated:
31 (50)
MaR: 21 (34)
MiR: 10(16) 		ESA‐naïve:
11 weeks (95% CI: 9–15)
ESA‐treated: 31 weeks
(95% CI: 13–NE) 		NA
Gotlib et al (2009) Non‐RARS: DA 4·5 μg/kg/week for 6 weeks; if did not achieve Hb >20 g/l rise, increased to 9·0 μg/kg/week for 6 weeks; if no >20 g/l Hb rise added 2·5 μg/kg G‐CSF Q2W for 6 weeks
RARS: initiated DA 9·0 μg/kg/week for 6 weeks; if no >20 g/l Hb rise then addition of 2·5 μg/kg G‐CSF Q2W 		IWG 2000 (primary),
IWG 2006 (calculated) 		Non‐RARS: 18 weeks
RARS:12 weeks
All patients followed for 3 months (maintenance phase if MaR achieved) 		NA NA IWG 2000:
Non‐RARS (N = 15): 4 (27)
MaR: 4 (27);MiR: 0 (0) 		NA NA 18 week
IWG 2000 (N = 24): 16 (67)
Mar: 12 (50)
MiR: 4 (17)
IWG 2006
14 (58) 		5 weeks
(3–18) 		MaR: 12 months (4–19)
MiR: 5 months (2–7·5)
Oliva et al (2010) 150 μg QW; 300 μg QW for no response after 4 weeks in TF patients and 8 weeks in TD patients; dose escalated to 300 μg for patients without MiR at week 8 for TF or week 16 for TD. 150 μg Q3W if Hb >10 g/l during the first 2 weeks or Hb increased to >120 g/l IWG 2000 (primary),
IWG 2006
(evaluated) 		24 weeks NA NA NA NA 29 (73)
TF: 15 (65)
TD: 14 (82)
IWG 2006
23 (58)
TF: 13 (56)
TD: 10 (59) 		  8·0 weeks
(95% CI: 7·6–8·4) 		Mean: 21·9 weeks (95% CI: 19·7–24·0), median not reached
Nilsson‐Ehle et al (2011) 300 μg QW, G‐CSF added for patients with TD RARS, and nonresponders from week 9, DA dose interval increased to 14 days, further to 21 days if persistent high Hb, and then stopped until Hb <120 g/l. Pts not reaching Hb 120 g/l after week 16 also received erythrocyte transfusions for ≥8 weeks (study weeks 18–26) to maintain Hb >120 g/l Non‐IWG: Complete response (Hb ≥115 g/l and no transfusion requirement)
Partial response (increase of ≥15 g/l or transfusion independence in TD patients. 		26 weeks   – – 20 (56)
CR: 11 (31)
PR: 9 (25) 		– – NA NA
Villegas et al (2011) 300 μg QW for 8 weeks; dosing extended to Q2W for patients with MaR, or G‐CSF initiated for patients with MiR/no response. At week 16 patients without MaR withdrawn; patients with MaR on treatment at physician's discretion weeks 16–24. IWG 2000 24 weeks Median 28 weeks (95% CI: 20–NE) 31 (70)
MaR: 21 (48)
MiR: 10 (23)
TF: 23 (72)
MaR: 15 (47)
MiR: 8 (25)
TD: 8 (67)
MaR: 6 (50)
MiR: 2 (17) 		  31 (70)
MaR: 27 (61)
MiR: 4 (9)
TF: 23 (72)
MaR: 19 (59)
MiR: 4 (13)
TD: 8 (67)
MaR: 8 (67)
MiR: 0 (0) 		32 (73)
MaR: 27 (61)
MiR: 5 (11)
TF: 24 (75)
MaR: 19 (59)
MiR: 5 (16)
TD: 8 (67)
MaR: 8 (67)
MiR: 0 (0) 		NA MaR: 9 weeks (95% CI: 4–16) NA
Kelaidi et al (2013a) 500 μg Q2W for 12 weeks; G‐CSF 300 μg twice weekly added if no response for additional 12 weeks; DA discontinued if no response after 24 weeks; DA doses adjusted to maintain Hb 110–120 g/l in responders IWG 2006 (primary),
IWG 2000 (calculated) 		24 weeks 52 months NA IWG 2006:
46 (48)
IWG 2000:
57 (60)
MaR: 39 (41)
MiR: 18 (19) 		NA IWG 2006:
53 (56)
IWG 2000:
56 (59)
MaR: 47 (49)
MiR: 9 (9) 		NA 5 weeks
(1–20) 		Median duration not reached (95% CI: 30 months–undefined)
Jang et al (2015)b 60, 120, 240 μg for 16 weeks, dose adjustment allowed to 48 weeks with QW, Q2W Modified IWG 2000e 48 weeks; initial evaluation 16 weeks 316 days (1‐600) NA NA 29 (58)
MaR: 11 (22)
MiR: 18 (36) 		  Some results reported for week 17–48 but timing of responses not specified NA NA
Open in a new tab

CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; DA, darbepoetin alpha; G‐CSF, granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor; Hb, haemoglobin; MaR, major response; MiR, minor response; NA, not available; NE, not estimable; PR, partial response; QW, once weekly; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q3W, every 3 weeks; RARS, refractory anaemia with ring sideroblasts; TD, transfusion‐dependent; TF, transfusion‐free.

a

Response rate estimated based on the evaluable sample size.

b

Abstract only.

c

Cheson et al (2000).

d

Cheson et al (2006).

e

Modified International Working Group 2000 criteria: MaR: RBC transfusion‐free with an increase in Hb ≥1 g/l above baseline; MiR: ≥50% reduction in RBC transfusion compared to baseline.

Erythroid response rate and meta‐analysis

Nine studies reported response according to IWG 2000 criteria within 12–24 weeks, with response rates ranging from 38% to 72·5% (Musto et al, 2005; Stasi et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Gabrilove et al, 2008; Gotlib et al, 2009; Oliva et al, 2010; Villegas et al, 2011; Kelaidi et al, 2013a; Jang et al, 2015). The results for response rates are summarized in Table 2. Median time to response ranged from 4 to 9 weeks among responders (Musto et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Gotlib et al, 2009; Kelaidi et al, 2013a) and 8 to 9 weeks when both responders and non‐responders were included using the Kaplan–Meier estimates of response time (Oliva et al, 2010; Villegas et al, 2011). Additionally, Gabrilove et al (2008) reported a median time to response of 11 weeks for ESA‐naïve patients and 31 weeks for patients previously treated with ESAs based on responders and non‐responders (Table 2). The median duration of response was between 12 and at least 51 months (Gotlib et al, 2009; Musto et al, 2005; Oliva et al, 2010; Stasi et al, 2005b).

The response rates are also summarized in Fig 2. The responses were too heterogeneous to be combined (P < 0·001) but several subgroups were similar enough to be combined. Based on the six studies that reported results separately by baseline EPO level (Musto et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Gabrilove et al, 2008; Gotlib et al, 2009; Villegas et al, 2011; Jang et al, 2015), patients with EPO levels <100 iu/l had 38% (95% CI: 26–49%; P < 0·0001) better absolute response rate than patients with baseline EPO levels >100 iu/l (Fig 3, Fig S1). Patients with EPO levels <100 iu/l had an average response of 81% (95% CI: 74%–88%). Based on the four studies that reported response by previous ESA treatment (Musto et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Gabrilove et al, 2008; Oliva et al, 2010), patients who were ESA‐naïve at baseline had a 17% (95% CI: 3–32%; P = 0·022) improved response rate than patients who had been previously treated with an ESA (Fig 4A). Response rates for ESA‐naïve patients ranged from 45% to 73% and previously treated patients ranged from 25% to 75% (Musto et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Gabrilove et al, 2008; Oliva et al, 2010), showing that even patients previously exposed to an ESA can exhibit an erythroid response when treated with DA. Additionally, at the study level, higher mean baseline haemoglobin was associated with a greater response rate (P = 0·020) (Fig 5, Fig S2). No evidence of publication bias was seen in the funnel plot (Fig S3). Sensitivity analyses of the subgroups using log odds ratio rather than absolute difference in response yielded similar results.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Erythroid response rate reported in studies using IWG 2000 criteria (Cheson et al, 2000). Study‐level meta‐analysis of the proportion of MDS patients treated with darbepoetin alpha who achieved an erythroid response is shown. Squares represent point values, diamonds represent combined estimate point value and confidence interval, and horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals. CI, confidence interval.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Erythroid response rate by baseline serum EPO level: EPO <100 iu/l compared to EPO >200 iu/l. Study‐level meta‐analysis of the proportion of MDS patients with erythroid response by serum EPO levels <100 iu/l and >200 iu/l at baseline is shown. Squares represent point values, diamonds represent combined estimate point value and confidence interval, and horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals. EPO, erythropoietin; CI, confidence interval.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Erythroid response rates based on transfusion dependence/independence and previous ESA exposure. Study‐level meta‐analyses of the erythroid response rates in MDS patients who were (A) ESA‐naïve vs previously treated patients and (B) transfusion‐dependent and transfusion‐independent are shown. Squares represent point values, diamonds represent combined estimate point value and confidence interval, and horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals. CI, confidence interval; TD, transfusion‐dependent; TI, transfusion‐independent.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Erythroid response rate by baseline mean or median haemoglobin concentration. Study‐level meta‐analysis of the erythroid response rates in MDS patients by mean or median haemoglobin level is shown. Squares represent point values, diamonds represent combined estimate point value and confidence interval, and horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals. CI, confidence interval; Hb, haemoglobin.

Other trends were found that were suggestive but did not reach statistical significance. Patients who were transfusion‐independent at baseline tended to have a 17% (95% CI: −2–36%; P = 0·073) better response rate than patients who were transfusion‐dependent at baseline (Fig 4B) in the five studies that reported response rates by baseline transfusion status (Musto et al, 2005; Stasi et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Gotlib et al, 2009; Oliva et al, 2010). At the study level, initial mean dose tended to be associated with response: the estimated response for a mean initial dose of 150 μg QW was 57% (95% CI: 49–66%) compared to 64% (95% CI: 55–74%) for 300 μg QW (P = 0·20) (Fig 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Erythroid response rate by mean initial dose of DA. Study‐level meta‐analysis of erythroid response rates in MDS patients by DA dose is shown. Squares represent point values, diamonds represent combined estimate point value and confidence interval, and horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals. *Jang 2015 study was a three‐arm randomized controlled trial with three different dose levels. CI, confidence interval; DA, darbepoetin alpha; QW, once weekly; mcg, μg.

The two studies that initiated G‐CSF add‐on therapy for non‐RARS patients before response evaluation (Gotlib et al, 2009; Villegas et al, 2011) had response rates of 67% and 70% compared to the remaining seven studies, which had response rates ranging from 38% to 72%. Villegas et al (2011) added G‐CSF for patients with no or minor response after 8 weeks of 300 μg of DA QW. Gotlib et al (2009) doubled the weight‐based dose of DA from 4·5 μg/kg/week to 9·0 μg/kg/week at 6 weeks for patients who did not achieve an increase in their haemoglobin of greater than 20 g/l; at 12 weeks, G‐CSF was added to the regimen for patients who did not achieve an increase in their haemoglobin of greater than 20 g/l.

Qualitative results

Predictors of response

Several studies identified significant potential predictors of response. These results are summarized in Table 3. The most commonly identified predictor of response was low EPO level at baseline, which was reported in seven studies (Musto et al, 2005; Stasi et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Gotlib et al, 2009; Villegas et al, 2011; Kelaidi et al, 2013b; Jang et al, 2015). This result was confirmed in the current meta‐analysis. Five studies identified transfusion independence as a predictor of response (Musto et al, 2005; Stasi et al, 2005; Mannone et al, 2006; Gotlib et al, 2009; Kelaidi et al, 2013b). In addition to baseline EPO and transfusion‐dependent status at baseline, the most commonly identified predictors of response were: low IPSS score (Gabrilove et al, 2008; Gotlib et al, 2009; Kelaidi et al, 2013b); baseline haemoglobin (Oliva et al, 2010; Kelaidi et al, 2013b; Jang et al, 2015); no excess of blasts in bone marrow (Musto et al, 2005; Kelaidi et al, 2013b); iron status at baseline (Gabrilove et al, 2008; Jang et al, 2015); WHO classification (Kelaidi et al, 2013b); karyotype (Gotlib et al, 2009); hypoplastic bone marrow (Musto et al, 2005); and ESA‐naïve at baseline (Gabrilove et al, 2008).

Table 3.

Findings on predictors of erythroid response in published studies

Potential predictor Studies that reported statistical positive findingsa
Univariate Multivariate
WHO classification Kelaidi et al (2013a)b
IPSS Gabrilove et al (2008); Kelaidi et al (2013a); Gotlib et al (2009)
Karyotype (cytogenetic risk) Gotlib et al (2009)
Hypoplastic bone marrow Musto et al (2005)
ESA‐naïve vs ESA‐prior treated Gabrilove et al (2008)
Iron status/baseline ferritin Kelaidi et al (2013a); Jang et al (2015)
Baseline Hb Kelaidi et al (2013a)b; Oliva et al (2010); Jang et al (2015)
Baseline serum EPO Musto et al (2005); Stasi et al (2005); Mannone et al (2006); Gabrilove et al (2008); Villegas et al (2011); Kelaidi et al (2013a)b; Jang et al (2015) Musto et al (2005); Stasi et al (2005); Kelaidi et al (2013a)b
No excess of blast in bone marrow Kelaidi et al (2013a); Musto et al (2005) Musto et al (2005)
Transfusion independence Musto et al (2005); Stasi et al (2005); Mannone et al (2006); Gotlib et al (2009); Kelaidi et al (2013a)b Musto et al (2005)
Open in a new tab

EPO, erythropoetin; ESA, erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent; Hb, haemoglobin; IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System; WHO, World Health Organization.

a

P‐value <0·05 considered significant.

b

Based on International Working Group 2006 definition of response (Cheson et al, 2006).

Transfusion independence

Table S1 summarizes transfusion independence and the risk of transfusion, with transfusion requirements generally decreasing after treatment with DA. The decrease in transfusion rate was quantified in several ways. Nilsson‐Ehle et al (2011) reported that of 11 patients who were transfusion‐dependent at baseline, 5 became transfusion‐independent by the end of the study; and Jang et al (2015) reported that 14 previously transfusion‐dependent patients became transfusion‐independent during the study. Villegas et al (2011) reported the transfusion rate decreased from 27·3% at baseline to 0% at 24 weeks, and Gabrilove et al (2008) reported that their overall transfusion rate for the 52‐week treatment period was 28% for ESA‐naïve patients and 42% for patients previously treated with an ESA. In terms of numbers of units, Musto et al (2005) reported that the transfusion requirement decreased from 2·1 units per person per month at baseline to 1·6 units per person per month at 12 weeks. A further two studies reported a significant decrease in transfusion requirements from baseline (Stasi et al, 2005; Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011).

Quality of life

QoL was measured using several metrics in six of the studies, with most studies reporting that responders showed significant improvement in QoL (Table S2). For example, two studies reported that responders had a difference of between +12 and +17 points in the FACT‐Anaemia (FACT‐An) compared to non‐responders (Stasi et al, 2005; Kelaidi et al, 2013a), and a difference of between +2·4 to +5·6 points between responders and non‐responders for the FACT‐Fatigue (FACT‐F) has been reported (Gabrilove et al, 2008; Villegas et al, 2011). An increase in the FACT‐F of ≥3 points has been reported to be clinically significant (Cella et al, 2002). Increased QoL was correlated with increased haemoglobin levels in four of the six studies that reported QoL (Stasi et al, 2005; Gabrilove et al, 2008; Oliva et al, 2010; Villegas et al, 2011).

Safety

Reported AEs across the ten studies were collated and are summarized in Table 4. A total of 127 AEs were reported across the 647 patients in the ten studies, including 37 deaths (5·7%). Progression to AML was reported in eight cases (1·2%) and disease progression was reported in three cases (0·5%). The most common AEs were neoplasm (3·2%), hypertension (3·2%) and stroke (1·4%).

Table 4.

Safety of DA in patients with MDS

AE reporting N (n = 647 patients) n (%) N of studies Comment
Total number of reported AEs 127 Only includes ‘AE of interest’ from Gabrilove et al (2008)
Total all‐cause death 37/647 (5·7)
Cardiovascular/Pulmonary/Cerebrovascular
Hypertension 21 (3·2) 2 (Mannone et al, 2006; Gotlib et al, 2009); 6 (Gabrilove et al, 2008; Kelaidi et al, 2013a); 6 (Jang et al, 2015) 1 case related to treatment (Gabrilove et al, 2008)
Thromboembolism 7 (1·1) 3 (Gabrilove et al, 2008; Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011; Villegas et al, 2011) 2 cases not related to treatment (Gabrilove et al, 2008)
Pulmonary embolism 2 (0·3) 2 (Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011; Kelaidi et al, 2013a) 1 fatal, one nonfatal
Stroke 9 (1·4) 2 (Gabrilove et al, 2008; Kelaidi et al, 2013a) 1 fatal (Kelaidi et al (2013a); 7 cases unknown if related to treatment (Gabrilove et al, 2008)
Haematological
Thrombocytopenia 5 (0·8) 1 (Gotlib et al, 2009) 4 cases unknown if related to treatment
Iron deficiency 2 (0·3) 1 (Villegas et al, 2011)
Progressed disease 3 (0·5) 2 (Gotlib et al, 2009; Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011); 1 (Kelaidi et al, 2013a) 1 case progression not reported
Hyperleucocytosis 1 (0·2) 1
Progression to AML 8 (1·2) 6 (Gabrilove et al, 2008) 2 (Jang et al, 2015); 2 (Kelaidi et al, 2013a); 1 (Mannone et al, 2006); 4 (Gotlib et al, 2009) 6 cases unknown if related to treatment (Gabrilove et al, 2008)
Renal dysfunction
Renal failure 1 (0·2) 1 (Mannone et al, 2006)
Creatinine elevation 1 (0·2) 1 (Gotlib et al, 2009)
Proteinuria 1 (0·2) 1 (Gotlib et al, 2009)
Other
Neoplasm 21 (3·2) 1 (Gabrilove et al, 2008) 1 case unknown if related to treatment
Bone pain 3 (0·5) 1 (Gotlib et al, 2009)
Coma 1 (0·2) 1 (Kelaidi et al, 2013a) 1 case unknown if related to treatment
Filgrastim‐related arthralgia/myalgia 4 (0·6) 2 (Nilsson‐Ehle et al, 2011; Kelaidi et al, 2013a)
Flu 1 (0·2) 1 (Villegas et al, 2011)
Headache 1 (0·2) 1 (Villegas et al, 2011)
Immune system disorder 1 (0·1) 1 (Gabrilove et al, 2008) 1 case unknown if related to treatment
Injection site reaction 5 (0·8) 2 (Stasi et al, 2005; Kelaidi et al, 2013a)
Rash 3 (0·5) 1 (Kelaidi et al, 2013a)
Seizure 1 (0·2) 1 (Gabrilove et al, 2008) 1 case unknown if related to treatment
Open in a new tab

AE, adverse event; AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; DA, darbepoetin alpha.

Discussion

This up‐to‐date analysis comprehensively examined the published literature evaluating the efficacy and safety of DA for treating anaemia in patients with MDS. This systematic review found that patients treated with DA exhibited high haemoglobin response (38–72%) and a median duration of response ranging from 12 to at least 51 months. This compares favourably to ESAs; the most recent meta‐analysis on ESA treatment in patients with MDS reported an overall response rate of 57·6% in patients receiving ESA monotherapy (Moyo et al, 2008), and in another large study, median response to ESA therapy was approximately 2 years (Park et al, 2008).

It is important to identify patients for whom ESA treatment may be most efficacious. The meta‐analysis of studies that reported results stratified by baseline EPO levels indicated that patients with lower EPO levels (<100 iu/l) at baseline had an overall response of 81%, and on average 38% better response than patients with higher baseline EPO levels (>100 iu/l). However, EPO level is a continuous variable, with lower baseline EPO levels tending to be correlated with higher erythroid response rates. We also identified prior ESA treatment as a significant risk factor for poor response: in studies that reported results for ESA‐naïve and previously treated patients separately, ESA‐naïve patients had a 17% better response rate than previously treated patients. Although the response rate for ESA‐naïve patients was greater than for previously treated patients, 25% to 75% of patients who had been previously treated with an ESA did respond to the long‐acting DA in the four studies that reported results by ESA exposure. Where possible, we reported results separately for ESA‐naïve patients and those who had been previously treated with ESAs.

We also observed a positive association between baseline haemoglobin and response rate: higher baseline levels were correlated with improved responses. It is likely that higher endogenous EPO level (e.g., patients with refractory anaemia), or lower haemoglobin level may indicate relative non‐responsiveness of bone marrow. This may also suggest that early initiation of ESA treatment, before haemoglobin decreases to very low levels, may increase the likelihood of response. However, this result should be interpreted with caution as the study‐level mean or median baseline haemoglobin concentration may mask important information at the patient level.

Other non‐significant results were suggestive. Higher dosing regimens of DA tended to correlate with improved erythroid response, but further studies are needed. Another trend we observed was between transfusion dependence at baseline and response: in the studies that reported results stratified by transfusion dependence, transfusion‐independent patients tended to have 17% higher response rate on average.

In the qualitative review, several studies reported a significant association between IPSS and G‐CSF and response. However, most of the significant predictors of response were identified based on unadjusted estimates (univariate) rather than adjusted for other factors (multivariate). For IPSS, the vast majority of patients in the studies were classified as either low‐risk or intermediate‐1 risk, and this would make detecting a trend between IPSS risk and response difficult. Indeed, in general, the results from the meta‐regression analysis should be interpreted cautiously because of lack of individual data. More well‐designed prospective studies are needed to investigate simultaneously the effects of these factors and their interactions on response.

Five studies that examined the transfusion requirement (risk) after treatment consistently suggested that the transfusion requirements were significantly decreased after DA treatment compared to baseline. In addition, in the six studies reporting QoL using similar validated instruments, it was suggested that QoL significantly improved during treatment and was correlated with improved haemoglobin levels. However, the possibility of a confounding factor responsible for both QoL improvement and response cannot be ruled out.

As for the safety of DA, selected AEs were generally reported in less than 5% of treated patients in the published studies, mostly in single‐arm trials. As a result, it is not possible to determine whether the AEs observed in these single‐arm trials occurred at a rate that differs from the background rate. Results from an on‐going RCT should provide more insights on the efficacy and safety of DA for treating anaemia among patients with MDS.

Several limitations should be acknowledged. First, due to the amount of variation, the response rates could not be combined into a single meta‐analytic estimate. The variation in response rates may be due to the heterogeneous nature of the study populations and various treatment regimens. For example, studies reported differences in DA initiation and maintenance doses, prior ESA treatment, and rates of transfusion dependence, among other factors. Second, the total number of DA studies in MDS is relatively small, and studies are mostly single‐arm. However, it is known that, without intervention, patients are likely to deteriorate. Furthermore, a review of trials that compared ESA treatment to non‐growth factor therapy found that patients with ESA treatment do significantly better with respect to overall survival and progression‐free survival (Golshayan et al, 2007). Third, although meta‐analysis has the ability to improve the power of small or inconclusive studies, it cannot improve the quality of design and reporting of the original studies. For instance, data regarding duration of follow‐up and duration of response were limited. Fourth, the lack of primary source data from the original studies was a limitation as ecological bias may influence results. Thus, the results from our analyses should be interpreted with caution. Lastly, each study reported a different set of AEs and the reporting varied; a conclusive safety profile from the studies cannot be drawn. Thus, the safety data in this review serve to provide insight on the range of AEs reported in the literature, rather than to establish the safety evidence for use of ESAs in patients with MDS.

In summary, the present review suggests that treating low‐ to intermediate‐risk MDS patients with DA provides a clinical benefit for an otherwise debilitating chronic anaemia. Further studies are required to better identify predictors of the erythroid response, and therefore to better identify patients for whom ESA treatment may have a better opportunity of success. More RCTs are required to understand the long‐term benefit and safety of DA in patients with MDS with an appropriate risk profile.

Author contributions

S. Park contributed to the conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, and drafting of the manuscript. P. Fenaux contributed to the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of the data. P. Greenberg contributed to the conception and design of the study and the analysis and interpretation of the data. B. Mehta contributed to the conception and design of the study and analysis and interpretation of the data. F. Callaghan contributed to the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of the data. C. Kim contributed to the acquisition of data and analysis and interpretation of the data. D. Tomita contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data. H. Xu contributed to the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of the data. All authors contributed to the drafting of the manuscript, critical revisions of the manuscript for important intellectual content, and have approved the draft for publication.

Conflict‐of‐interest disclosures

S. Park has received grant/research support from Novartis International AG and Hospira, Inc., and has been a consultant to Hospira, Inc. and Celgene Corp. P. Fenaux and P. Greenberg have no conflicts to declare. B. Mehta, F. Callaghan, C. Kim, D. Tomita, and H. Xu are employees and shareholders of Amgen Inc.

Supporting information

Data S1. MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms and key words used in the systematic literature search.

Fig S1. Erythroid response rate difference for baseline EPO level: EPO <100 iu/L compared to EPO >100 IU/L. Study‐level meta‐analysis of the difference between erythroid response rates in MDS patients with baseline serum EPO levels <100 IU/L vs. >200 iu/L is shown. EPO, erythropoietin; CI, confidence interval.

Fig S2. Erythroid response rate by baseline hemoglobin levels. The proportion of patients achieving erythroid response by baseline hemoglobin level is shown for each study. Hb, hemoglobin; QW, once weekly.

Fig S3. Funnel plot for all studies. The proportion of response is compared against within‐study variation for each study; the symmetrical shape of the funnel suggested no evidence of publication bias. aStudy with non‐IWG 2000 criteria assessment.

Table S1. Transfusion independence and risk of transfusion in anemic MDS patients receiving DA in published studies

Table S2. Change in quality of life among patients with MDS receiving DA in published studies

Click here for additional data file. (432.5KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

Shawn Lee (Amgen Inc.), Brian Bradbury (Amgen Inc.), and Julia R. Gage (on behalf of Amgen Inc.) provided medical writing support.

Funding: This study was sponsored by Amgen Inc.

References

  1. Cella, D. , Lai, J.S. , Chang, C.H. , Peterman, A. & Slavin, M. (2002) Fatigue in cancer patients compared with fatigue in the general United States population. Cancer, 94, 528–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheson, B.D. , Bennett, J.M. , Kantarjian, H. , Pinto, A. , Schiffer, C.A. , Nimer, S.D. , Löwenberg, B. , Beran, M. , deWitte, T.M. , Stone, R.M. , Mittelman, M. , Sanz, G.F. , Wijermans, P.W. , Gore, S. & Greenberg, P.L. ; World Health Organization (WHO) international working group . (2000) Report of an international working group to standardize response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood, 96, 3671–3674. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheson, B.D. , Greenberg, P.L. , Bennett, J.M. , Lowenberg, B. , Wijermans, P.W. , Nimer, S.D. , Pinto, A. , Beran, M. , de Witte, T.M. , Stone, R.M. , Mittelman, M. , Sanz, G.F. , Gore, S.D. , Schiffer, C.A. & Kantarjian, H. (2006) Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood, 108, 419–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cogle, C.R. (2015) Incidence and burden of the Myelodysplastic syndromes. Currrent Hematologic Malignancy Reports, 10, 272–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gabrilove, J. , Paquette, R. , Lyons, R.M. , Mushtaq, C. , Sekeres, M.A. , Tomita, D. & Dreiling, L. (2008) Phase 2, single‐arm trial to evaluate the effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa for correcting anaemia in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. British Journal of Haematology, 142, 379–393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Garcia‐Manero, G. (2014) Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2014 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification, and management. American Journal of Hematology, 89, 97–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Golshayan, A.R. , Jin, T. , Maciejewski, J. , Fu, A.Z. , Bershadsky, B. , Kattan, M.W. , Kalaycio, M.E. & Sekeres, M.A. (2007) Efficacy of growth factors compared to other therapies for low‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes. British Journal of Haematology, 137, 125–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gotlib, J. , Lavori, P. , Quesada, S. , Stein, R.S. , Shahnia, S. & Greenberg, P.L. (2009) A Phase II intra‐patient dose‐escalation trial of weight‐based darbepoetin alfa with or without granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor in myelodysplastic syndromes. American Journal of Hematology, 84, 15–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenberg, P.L. , Sun, Z. , Miller, K.B. , Bennett, J.M. , Tallman, M.S. , Dewald, G. , Paietta, E. , van der Jagt, R. , Houston, J. , Thomas, M.L. , Cella, D. & Rowe, J.M. (2009) Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome patients with erythropoietin with or without granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor: results of a prospective randomized phase 3 trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E1996). Blood, 114, 2393–2400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenberg, P.L. , Attar, E. , Bennett, J.M. , Bloomfield, C.D. , Borate, U. , De Castro, C.M. , Deeg, H.J. , Frankfurt, O. , Gaensler, K. , Garcia‐Manero, G. , Gore, S.D. , Head, D. , Komrokji, R. , Maness, L.J. , Millenson, M. , O'Donnell, M.R. , Shami, P.J. , Stein, B.L. , Stone, R.M. , Thompson, J.E. , Westervelt, P. , Wheeler, B. , Shead, D.A. & Naganuma, M. (2013) Myelodysplastic syndromes: clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 11, 838–874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hedges, L.V. & Olkin, L. (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis, 1st edn Academic Press, Waltham, MA. [Google Scholar]
  12. Higgins, J.P. & Thompson, S.G. (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jadersten, M. , Malcovati, L. , Dybedal, I. , Della Porta, M.G. , Invernizzi, R. , Montgomery, S.M. , Pascutto, C. , Porwit, A. , Cazzola, M. & Hellstrom‐Lindberg, E. (2008) Erythropoietin and granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor treatment associated with improved survival in myelodysplastic syndrome. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 3607–3613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jang, J.H. , Harada, H. , Shibayama, H. , Shimazaki, R. , Kim, H.J. , Sawada, K. & Mitani, K. (2015) A randomized controlled trial comparing darbepoetin alfa doses in red blood cell transfusion‐dependent patients with low‐ or intermediate‐1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes. International Journal of Hematology, 102, 401–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kelaidi, C. & Fenaux, P. (2010) Darbepoetin alfa in anemia of myelodysplastic syndromes: present and beyond. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 10, 605–614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kelaidi, C. , Beyne‐Rauzy, O. , Braun, T. , Sapena, R. , Cougoul, P. , Ades, L. , Pillard, F. , Lamberto, C. , Charniot, J.C. , Guerci, A. , Choufi, B. , Stamatoullas, A. , Slama, B. , De Renzis, B. , Ame, S. , Damaj, G. , Boyer, F. , Chaury, M.P. , Legros, L. , Cheze, S. , Testu, A. , Gyan, E. , Bene, M.C. , Rose, C. , Dreyfus, F. & Fenaux, P. (2013a) High response rate and improved exercise capacity and quality of life with a new regimen of darbepoetin alfa with or without filgrastim in lower‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a phase II study by the GFM. Annals of Hematology, 92, 621–631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kelaidi, C. , Park, S. , Sapena, R. , Beyne‐Rauzy, O. , Coiteux, V. , Vey, N. , Stamatoullas, A. , Choufi, B. , Delaunay, J. , Gourin, M.P. , Cheze, S. , Ravoet, C. , Ferrant, A. , Escoffre‐Barbe, M. , Aljassem, L. , Raffoux, E. , Itzykson, R. , Ades, L. , Dreyfus, F. & Fenaux, P. (2013b) Long‐term outcome of anemic lower‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes without 5q deletion refractory to or relapsing after erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents. Leukemia, 27, 1283–1290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mannone, L. , Gardin, C. , Quarre, M. C. , Bernard, J. F. , Vassilieff, D. , Ades, L. , Park, S. , Vaultier, S. , Hamza, F. , Beyne‐rauzy, M. O. , Cheze, S. , Giraudier, S. , Agape, P. , Legros, L. , Voillat, L. , Dreyfus, F. & Fenaux, P. , Groupe Francais des Myelodysplasies . (2006) High‐dose darbepoetin alpha in the treatment of anaemia of lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome results of a phase II study. British Journal of Haematology, 133, 513–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Moyo, V. , Lefebvre, P. , Duh, M.S. , Yektashenas, B. & Mundle, S. (2008) Erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents in the treatment of anemia in myelodysplastic syndromes: a meta‐analysis. Annals of Hematology, 87, 527–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Musto, P. , Lanza, F. , Balleari, E. , Grossi, A. , Falcone, A. , Sanpaolo, G. , Bodenizza, C. , Scalzulli, P.R. , La Sala, A. , Campioni, D. , Ghio, R. , Cascavilla, N. & Carella, A.M. (2005) Darbepoetin alpha for the treatment of anaemia in low‐intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndromes. British Journal of Haematology, 128, 204–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Newcombe, R.G. (1998) Two‐sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 857–872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nilsson‐Ehle, H. , Birgegard, G. , Samuelsson, J. , Antunovic, P. , Astermark, J. , Garelius, H. , Engstrom, L.M. , Kjeldsen, L. , Nilsson, L. , Olsson, A. , Skov‐Holm, M. , Wallvik, J. , Gulbrandsen, N. & Hellstrom‐Lindberg, E. (2011) Quality of life, physical function and MRI T2* in elderly low‐risk MDS patients treated to a haemoglobin level of >/=120 g/L with darbepoetin alfa +/‐ filgrastim or erythrocyte transfusions. European Journal of Haematology, 87, 244–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Oliva, E.N. , Nobile, F. , Alimena, G. , Specchia, G. , Danova, M. , Rovati, B. , Ronco, F. , Impera, S. , Risitano, A. , Alati, C. , Breccia, M. , Carmosino, I. , Vincelli, I. & Latagliata, R. (2010) Darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia associated with myelodysplastic syndromes: efficacy and quality of life. Leukemia and Lymphoma, 51, 1007–1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Park, S. , Grabar, S. , Kelaidi, C. , Beyne‐Rauzy, O. , Picard, F. , Bardet, V. , Coiteux, V. , Leroux, G. , Lepelley, P. , Daniel, M. T. , Cheze, S. , Mahe, B. , Ferrant, A. , Ravoet, C. , Escoffre‐Barbe, M. , Ades, L. , Vey, N. , Aljassem, L. , Stamatoullas, A. , Mannone, L. , Dombret, H. , Bourgeois, K. , Greenberg, P. , Fenaux, P. & Dreyfus, F. , for the GFM group (Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies) . (2008) Predictive factors of response and survival in myelodysplastic syndrome treated with erythropoietin and G‐CSF: the GFM experience. Blood, 111, 574–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Park, S. , Kelaidi, C. , Sapena, R. , Vassilieff, D. , Beyne‐Rauzy, O. , Coiteux, V. , Vey, N. , Ravoet, C. , Cheze, S. , Rose, C. , Legros, L. , Stamatoullas, A. , Escoffre‐Barbe, M. , Guerci, A. , Chaury, M.P. , Fenaux, P. & Dreyfus, F. (2010) Early introduction of ESA in low risk MDS patients may delay the need for RBC transfusion: a retrospective analysis on 112 patients. Leukemia Research, 34, 1430–1436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Raudenbush, S. W. (2009) Analyzing effect sizes: random effects models In: The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta‐Analysis (ed. by Cooper H., Hedges L. V. & Valentine J. C.), pp. 295–315. 2nd edn Russel Sage Foundation, New York. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ross, S.D. , Allen, I.E. , Probst, C.A. , Sercus, B. , Crean, S.M. & Ranganathan, G. (2007) Efficacy and safety of erythropoiesis‐stimulating proteins in myelodysplastic syndrome: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Oncologist, 12, 1264–1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sekeres, M.A. , Schoonen, W.M. , Kantarjian, H. , List, A. , Fryzek, J. , Paquette, R. & Maciejewski, J.P. (2008) Characteristics of US patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of six cross‐sectional physician surveys. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 100, 1542–1551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Spiriti, M.A. , Latagliata, R. , Niscola, P. , Cortelezzi, A. , Francesconi, M. , Ferrari, D. , Volpe, E. , Clavio, M. , Grossi, A. , Reyes, M.T. , Musto, P. , Mitra, M.E. , Azzara, A. , Pagnini, D. , D'Arena, G. , Spadano, A. , Balleari, E. , Pecorari, P. , Capochiani, E. , De Biasi, E. , Perego, D. , Monarca, B. , Pisani, F. , Scaramella, G. & Petti, M.C. (2005) Impact of a new dosing regimen of epoetin alfa on quality of life and anemia in patients with low‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Annals of Hematology, 84, 167–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stasi, R. , Abruzzese, E. , Lanzetta, G. , Terzoli, E. & Amadori, S. (2005) Darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemic patients with low‐ and intermediate‐1‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Annals of Oncology, 16, 1921–1927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Steensma, D.P. & Bennett, J.M. (2006) The myelodysplastic syndromes: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 81, 104–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Venables, W. N. & Smith, D. M. , R Core Team . (2015) An introduction to R. Notes on R: A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics, Version 3.2.2. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-intro.pdf. Accessed 4 November 2015.
  33. Viechtbauer, W. (2010) Conducting meta‐analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48. [Google Scholar]
  34. Villegas, A. , Arrizabalaga, B. , Fernandez‐Lago, C. , Castro, M. , Mayans, J.R. , Gonzalez‐Porras, J.R. , Duarte, R.F. , Remacha, A.F. , Luno, E. & Gasquet, J.A. (2011) Darbepoetin alfa for anemia in patients with low or intermediate‐1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes and positive predictive factors of response. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 27, 951–960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data S1. MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms and key words used in the systematic literature search.

Fig S1. Erythroid response rate difference for baseline EPO level: EPO <100 iu/L compared to EPO >100 IU/L. Study‐level meta‐analysis of the difference between erythroid response rates in MDS patients with baseline serum EPO levels <100 IU/L vs. >200 iu/L is shown. EPO, erythropoietin; CI, confidence interval.

Fig S2. Erythroid response rate by baseline hemoglobin levels. The proportion of patients achieving erythroid response by baseline hemoglobin level is shown for each study. Hb, hemoglobin; QW, once weekly.

Fig S3. Funnel plot for all studies. The proportion of response is compared against within‐study variation for each study; the symmetrical shape of the funnel suggested no evidence of publication bias. aStudy with non‐IWG 2000 criteria assessment.

Table S1. Transfusion independence and risk of transfusion in anemic MDS patients receiving DA in published studies

Table S2. Change in quality of life among patients with MDS receiving DA in published studies

Click here for additional data file. (432.5KB, docx)

Articles from British Journal of Haematology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES