Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
. 2016 Nov 2;6:143. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00143

Molecular and Phylogenetic Characterization of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Strains in China

Xiangning Bai 1,†, Bin Hu 2,†, Yanmei Xu 1, Hui Sun 1, Ailan Zhao 1, Pengbin Ba 1, Shanshan Fu 1, Ruyue Fan 1, Yujuan Jin 3, Hong Wang 4, Qiusheng Guo 5, Xuebin Xu 6, Shan Lu 1,*, Yanwen Xiong 1,*
PMCID: PMC5089976  PMID: 27853704

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) causes diarrhea and hemorrhagic colitis with life-threatening complications, such as hemolytic uremic syndrome. The aim of this study was to assess the molecular epidemiologic features of non-O157 STEC strains from different resources in China and illustrate the role of animal reservoirs or animal-derived foodstuffs in human STEC infections. A collection of 301 non-O157 STEC isolates from domestic and wild animals (i.e., cattle, goat, pig, yak, pika, and antelope), raw meats (i.e., beef, pork, mutton, chicken, and duck), diarrheal patients, and healthy carriers in different regions of China were selected in this study. Of the 301 analyzed STEC isolates, 67 serogroups, and 118 serotypes were identified; this included some predominant serogroups associated with human disease, such as O26, O45, O103, O111, and O121. Eighteen different combinations of stx subtypes were found. Eleven isolates carried the intimin gene eae, 93 isolates contained ehxA, and 73 isolates carried astA. The prevalence of other putative adhesion genes saa, paa, efa1, and toxB was 28.90% (87), 6.98% (21), 2.31% (7), and 1% (3), respectively. The phylogenetic distribution of isolates was analyzed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Ninety-four sequence types were assigned across the 301 isolates. A subset of isolates recovered from yak and pika residing in the similar wild environments, Qinghai-Tibetan plateau, showed similar genetic profiles and more tendencies to cluster together. Isolates from goat and mutton exhibited close genetic relatedness with those from human-derived isolates, providing evidence that transmission may have occurred locally within intraspecies or interspecies, and importantly, from animal reservoirs, or raw meats to humans. Comparing isolates in this study with highly virulent strains by MLST, along with serotyping and virulence profiles, it is conceivable that some of isolates from goat, yak, or raw meats may have potential to cause human diseases.

Keywords: Shiga toxin, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, non-O157 STEC, MLST, China

Introduction

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) refers to an E. coli pathotype capable of producing either Shiga toxin 1 (Stx1), Shiga toxin 2 (Stx2), or both toxins. STEC has emerged as an important enteric foodborne zoonotic pathogen causing human gastrointestinal disease and has been implicated in sporadic cases and outbreaks of diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis (HC), and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) worldwide (Smith et al., 2014). Although STEC O157:H7 has been regarded as the predominant serotype and the main cause of STEC infection worldwide since the early 1980s, recent studies have shown that non-O157 STEC are emerging as important pathogens associated with numerous human infections as well as outbreaks of food-borne illnesses (Johnson et al., 2006; Käppeli et al., 2011). It was estimated that O157 was responsible for 35.9% of STEC infections, whereas non-O157 STEC was responsible for 64.1% of STEC infections in the United States (Scallan et al., 2011). Moreover, non-O157 STEC infections are responsible for majority of total STEC infections in Canada, Australia, Latin America, and Europe (Tozzi et al., 2003; Blanco et al., 2004; Brooks et al., 2005). To date, more than 200 non-O157 STEC serotypes have been identified and associated with human illness worldwide (Johnson et al., 2006; Coombes et al., 2008). Nevertheless, most studies have been focused on the serotype O157:H7 and the top six non-O157 serogroups (i.e., O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145) (Conrad et al., 2014); this is likely because there is no standard detection method covering all non-O157 STEC serotypes due to the high genotypic and phenotypic diversity. Therefore, the public health significance of non-O157 STEC is likely to be underestimated.

Shiga toxin is derived from Shigella dysenteriae, which was first described by Kiyoshi Shiga in 1898. The production of Stx is considered to be the most important virulence factor associated with STEC. In humans, Stx binds to the glycosphingolipid Gb3, a molecule that is mostly observed in kidney epithelium and endothelium as well as microvascular endothelial cells in intestinal lamina propria, and damages intestinal epithelial cells and kidneys resulting in HC and HUS (Melton-Celsa, 2014). Stxs are classified into two major types, Stx1 and Stx2, which are encoded by the stx1 and stx2 genes, respectively. Stx1 and Stx2 are further categorized into several subtypes, according to the classification proposed by Scheutz et al. The stx1 gene consists of three subtypes, stx1a, stx1c, and stx1d; while seven stx2 subtypes (i.e., stx2a, stx2b, stx2c, stx2d, stx2e, stx2f, and stx2g) have been identified (Scheutz et al., 2012). Specific stx subtypes are associated with human infections; for example, stx2a, stx2c, and stx2d are often isolated from patients with HUS (Fuller et al., 2011; Melton-Celsa, 2014; Fruth et al., 2015). Whereas, others are related to nonhuman animal infections; for example, stx2e is associated with edema disease in pigs (Meisen et al., 2013; Tseng et al., 2014).

In addition to Stx, there are other virulence factors that contribute to the pathogenesis of STEC (Farfan and Torres, 2012). The intimin, encoded by the eae gene on the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), can lead to the formation of attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions (Elliott et al., 2000). However, the emergence of human infections linked to LEE negative STEC strains indicates that this pathogenicity island is not the only factor responsible for adherence (Galli et al., 2010). Several other proteins have been proposed to be putative adhesion factors. ToxB is a protein that is identified from a 93-kb plasmid pO157 and is required for full adherence of the O157:H7 strain Sakai (Tatsuno et al., 2001). Saa is an autoagglutinating adhesin unique to LEE-negative STEC strains (Paton et al., 2001). Efa1 is associated with STEC serotypes that are linked to epidemic and/or serious diseases (Nicholls et al., 2000; Karmali et al., 2003). Paa is involved in the intimate attachment of bacteria to enterocytes and induces typical A/E lesions in pigs (Vidotto et al., 2013). Other virulence determinants have also been identified in STEC strains; for instance, the enterohemolysin, which is encoded by the ehxA gene on a 60-MDa virulence plasmid (Jiang et al., 2015), and the enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) heat-stable enterotoxin, which is encoded by the astA gene (Nishikawa et al., 2002).

Cattle are reported to likely be the most important reservoir of non-O157 STEC strains (Bibbal et al., 2015); however, other animals, such as sheep, goats, swine, birds, wild animals, and humans, can also harbor STEC strains in their digestive tracts (Mora et al., 2012; Chandran and Mazumder, 2013; Singh et al., 2015). In our previous study, we investigated STEC in some domestic and wild animals, as well as foodstuffs of animal origin, in China (Bai et al., 2013, 2015, 2016; Meng et al., 2014). STEC strains have also been isolated from diarrheal patients in China (Xiong et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2015). However, little knowledge is available on the molecular and phylogenetic properties of non-O157 STEC from various sources in China, and the role of animal reservoirs or animal-derived foodstuffs in causing human non-O157 STEC infections remains unknown. The aim of the study was a further characterization of non-O157 STEC isolates recovered from multiple sources including domestic and wild animals (i.e., cattle, goat, pig, yak, pika, and antelope), raw meats (i.e., beef, pork, mutton, chicken, and duck), diarrheal patients, and healthy carriers in different regions of China.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

In total, 301 non-O157 STEC isolates were collected from various sources in China; of these, 54, 22, 93, and 63 were isolated from the yak, pika, pig, and raw meats sources reported in our previous studies (Bai et al., 2013, 2015, 2016; Meng et al., 2014). Additionally, 2, 12, 28, 24, and 3 strains were isolated from antelope, cattle, goat, diarrheal patients, and healthy carriers respectively (Table 1); these strains were isolated using previously described methods (Bai et al., 2016). Briefly, all samples were enriched in E. coli broth (Land Bridge, Beijing, China) and screened for stx genes by a duplex PCR assay; the primers used for detecting stx1 and stx2 genes are listed in Table 2. Enriched samples that tested positive for stx1 and/or stx2 genes were plated on CHROMagar™ ECC agar (CHROMagar, Paris, France), CHROMagar™ STEC agar (CHROMagar, Paris, France), and MacConkey agar (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) and incubated overnight at 37°C. The following colonies were picked and screened for the presence of stx1 and/or stx2 genes by single colony duplex PCR assay: blue or colorless round moist E. coli-like colonies on ECC agar; mauve colonies on STEC agar; and pink or red colonies on MacConkey agar. Each stx-positive isolate was confirmed to be E. coli by biochemical tests using the commercially available API 20E system (bioMérieux, France; http://www.biomerieux.com). The prevalence of non-O157 STEC in different sources is shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Non-O157 STEC isolates used in this study and origin of isolation.

Source Location Sampling year No. of samples No. of isolates No. MLST analyzed
Yak Yushu Tibetan 2012 728 128 54
Pika Yushu Tibetan 2012, 2013, 2015 1116 22 22
Antelope Hoh Xil 2014 –a 2 2
Cattle Heilongjiang and Shandong 2009, 2012, 2015 440 12 12
Goat Henan 2011 –a 28 28
Pig Chongqing, Beijing, and Guizhou 2011–2012 1003 93 93
Raw meat Beijing and Sichuan 2013–2014 853 63 63
Diarrheal patient Henan, Shenzhen, Shanghai, and Sichuan 2010–2014 870 24b 24
Healthy carrier Qinghai and Shenzhen 2013–2014 1058 3 3
Total 6068 375 301
Open in a new tab
a

The number of samples was not applicable.

b

Among the 24 isolates, 11 were recovered from the 870 diarrheal patients from Henan province, and 13 were obtained from local centers for disease control and prevention of Shenzhen city, Shanghai city, and Sichuan province. The number of samples was not applicable.

Table 2.

PCR primers used for the detection of STEC virulence or adherence genes (Bai et al., 2016).

Target Primer forward/Primer reverse (5′-3′) Amplicon size (bp) Annealing temperature (°C)
stx1 AAATCGCCATTCGTTGACTACTTCT/ 370a 58
TGCCATTCTGGCAACTCGCGATGCA
stx2 CAGTCGTCACTCACTGGTTTCATCA/ 283a 58
GGATATTCTCCCCACTCTGACACC
stx2 ATGAAGTGTATATTATTTAAATGG/ 1260b 55
TCAGTCATTATTAAACTGCAC
eae TCAATGCAGTTCCGTTATCAGTT/ 482 58
GTAAAGTCCGTTACCCCAACCTG
efa1 GAGACTGCCAGAGAAAG/ 479 51
GGTATTGTTGCATGTTCAG
saa CGTGATGAACAGGCTATTGC/ 119 52
ATGGACATGCCTGTGGCAAC
paa ATGAGGAAACATAATGGCAGG/ 350 60
TCTGGTCAGGTCGTCAATAC
astA CCATCAACACAGTATATCCGA/ 111 55
GGTCGCGAGTGACGGCTTTGT
ehxA GGTGCAGCAGAAAAAGTTGTAG/ 1551 57
TCTCGCCTGATAGTGTTTGGTA
toxB ATACCTACCTGCTCTGGATTGA/ 602 55
TTCTTACCTGATCTGATGCAGC
Open in a new tab
a

Primers for detection of stx1 and stx2 using duplex PCR.

b

Primers used for amplifying and sequencing the full length of stx2.

Serotyping

The O antigen was initially screened using the O-genotyping PCR method to identify and classify the E. coli O serogroups (Iguchi et al., 2015). The complete E. coli O antisera (O1-O188; Statens Serum Institut, Hillerød, Denmark) were used to confirm the PCR results. The isolates were referred as O-untypable if they did not react with any O antisera. The entire coding sequence of fliC was amplified by PCR using the primers: F-FLIC1 (5′-ATGGCACAAGTCATTAATACCCAAC-3′) and R-FLIC2 (5′-CTAACCCTGCAGCAGAGACA-3′) (Fields et al., 1997). Then, the PCR products were sequenced and compared to a publicly available CGE SerotypeFinder database (http://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/) to determine the H type of each isolate (Joensen et al., 2015). The isolate was H-untypable if fliC was negative by PCR.

stx subtyping and detection of virulence factors

The stx1 and/or stx2 subtypes of all non-O157 STEC isolates were determined by PCR-based subtyping method (Scheutz et al., 2012). The full length of stx1 and/or stx2 gene of some STEC isolates was amplified using previously reported primers (Bai et al., 2016), and the gene was sequenced to verify the PCR-based subtyping results. The neighbor-joining cluster analysis was employed to assign subtypes or variants (Scheutz et al., 2012).

Except for the stx genes, all 301 non-O157 STEC isolates were subjected to PCR for detection of the intimin-encoding gene eae, the putative adhesin genes efa1, saa, paa, and toxB, and the virulence genes ehxA and astA (Table 2).

Multilocus sequence typing

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was used to characterize phylogenetic relationships and assess the potential risks for human infection. Defined fragments of the seven housekeeping genes (i.e., adk, icd, fumC, recA, mdh, gyrB, and purA) were amplified and sequenced according to the E. coli MLST website (http://mlst.warwick.ac.uk/mlst/dbs/Ecoli). Sequences types (STs) for each isolate were assigned based on the allelic profile of the seven housekeeping genes. A neighbor-joining tree was constructed by MEGA 6 based on the concatenated sequences of the seven housekeeping genes, and was used to analyze the phylogenetic relationships among strains. STs of isolates from this study were then compared with those from highly pathogenic STEC strains, including the STs of the HUS-associated enterohemorrhagic E. coli (HUSEC) collection (www.ehec.org) (Mellmann et al., 2008), and human STEC STs of O157 and the top six non-O157 serogroups (i.e., O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145 retrieved from the E. coli MLST website). A minimum spanning tree (MST) based on these STs was generated using the BioNumerics software.

Results

Serogroups and serotypes

There were 118 distinct serotypes from the 301 isolates in this study; this included 67 O serogroups and 25 H types. Sixty-three isolates were O-untypable (ONT) and five isolates were H-untypable (HNT). The predominant were serotypes ONT:H30 and O20:H30, which accounted for 30 and 21 isolates, respectively; other prevalent serotypes were: O2:H32 (10 isolates), ONT:H21 (9 isolates), O21:H25 (9 isolates), O128:H2 (8 isolates), O103:H8 (8 isolates), O2:H45 (7 isolates), O130:H8 (6 isolates), O117:H21 (6 isolates), O8:H16 (5 isolates), and O176:H4 (5 isolates). Nine serotypes (i.e., ONT:H20, ONT:H19, O91:H4, O91:H14, O8:H9, O8:H19, O172:H30, O104:H7, and O100:H20) contained four isolates each; 11 serotypes (i.e., ONT:H8, ONT:H7, O98:H30, O81:H31, O8:H2, O78:H8, O74:H8, O26:H11, O22:H8, O117:H8, and O100:H19) contained three isolates each; 22 serotypes contained two isolates each; while 64 serotypes contained only one isolate each (Table S1).

The majority of non-O157 STEC strains that are a threat to human health are associated with six specific serogroups (i.e., O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145). In this study, four isolates from diarrheal patients were assigned to these serogroups/serotypes (three were O26:H11 and one was O111:H8). The serotypes O103:H8 and O45:H2 were detected in eight and two goat isolates, respectively; two beef isolates were assigned to serotype O103:H25, and serotype O121:H10 was found in one pork isolate. None of the STEC isolates from antelopes, pikas, yaks, pigs, cattle, or healthy carriers belonged to the six top serogroups (Table S1).

Shiga toxin and presence of other virulence genes

Of the 301 STEC strains characterized, 79 (26.25%) were stx1 positive only, 192 (63.79%) were stx2 positive only, and 30 (9.97%) were both stx1 and stx2 positive. Overall, three stx1 subtypes (i.e., stx1a, stx1c, and stx1d) and six stx2 subtypes (i.e., stx2a, stx2b, stx2c, stx2d, stx2e, and stx2g) were detected; this resulted in a total of 18 different stx1 and stx2 subtype combinations. Among these subtype combinations, stx2e was most prevalent (121 isolates), followed by stx1a (43), stx1c (35), stx2b (26), stx2d (20), stx1a, and stx2d (10), and stx2g(10); this accounted for a total of 265 strains (88.04%) (Table 3).

Table 3.

stx prevalence in relation to origin of isolation.

stx types and subtypes (no. of strains, %) No. of strains isolated from:
Yak (n = 54) Pika (n = 22) Antelope (n = 2) Cattle (n = 12) Goat (n = 28) Pig (n = 93) Raw meat (n = 63) Diarrheal patient (n = 24) Healthy carrier (n = 3) Total (n = 301)
stx1 (79, 26.25%) 11 5 2 0 19 0 20 21 1 79
stx2 (192, 63.79%) 35 14 0 10 4 93 32 3 1 192
stx1+stx2 (30, 9.97%) 8 3 0 2 5 0 11 0 1 30
stx2e (121, 41.20%) 0 0 0 0 1 93 25 2 0 121
stx1a (43, 14.29%) 11 5 2 0 9 0 6 10 0 43
stx1c (35, 11.63%) 0 0 0 0 10 0 13 11 1 35
stx2b (26, 8.64%) 20 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 26
stx2d (20, 6.64%) 5 7 0 4 2 0 1 0 1 20
stx1a+stx2d (10, 3.32%) 5 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 10
stx2g (10, 3.32%) 3 0 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 10
stx1c+stx2b (9, 2.99%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9
stx2a (8, 2.66%) 3 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 8
stx1c+stx2d (4, 1.33%) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4
stx1a+stx2a (3, 0.99%) 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3
stx1a+stx2b (3, 0.99%) 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
stx2c (3, 0.99%) 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3
stx2a+stx2c (2, 0.66%) 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
stx1d (1, 0.33%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
stx2a+stx2d (1, 0.33%) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
stx2a+stx2b (1, 0.33%) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
stx1a+stx2a+stx2b (1, 0.33%) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Open in a new tab

Isolates from yaks, pikas, goats, raw meats, and healthy carriers had different stx subtypes and combinations. All of the 107 pig-derived isolates (93 from fecal samples and 14 from pork) possessed only stx2e. Two isolates from antelope were only stx1a. The majority of cattle isolates (10/12, 83.33%) harbored only stx2; of these, stx2d and stx2g were the dominant subtypes. The isolates from diarrheal patients were largely dominated by only stx1 (21/24, 87.5%); of these, 10 were the stx1a subtype and 11 were the stx1c subtype (Table 3).

For the other virulence genes: 11 isolates from diarrheal patients (5), beef (3), cattle (1), yak (1), and mutton (1) were eae positive; all of these also had high virulent stx profiles (eight contained only stx1a, two carried only stx2c, and one harbored only stx2a). ehxA was detected in 93 isolates covering all reservoirs investigated in this study, and the 11 eae positive isolates were all positive for ehxA. Seventy-three isolates contained astA; the majority (51/73, 69.86%) of these were pig-derived. The prevalence of the adhesion-associated genes saa, paa, and efa1 was 28.90% (87), 6.98% (21), and 2.31% (7), respectively (Table 4). Notably, three isolates from diarrheal patients (STEC406, STEC411, and STEC416) assigned to the highly virulent serotype O26:H11 were toxB positive, and all of them possessed eae, ehxA, efa1, and paa (Table S1).

Table 4.

Virulence genes in non-O157 STEC isolates.

No. of isolates eae ehxA astA efa1 saa paa toxB
1 + + − + + + −
1 + + − + + − −
3 + + − + − + +
1 + + − + − + −
3 + + − − − + −
2 + + − − − − −
1 − + + − − + −
1 − + + − − − −
1 − + − + − + −
64 − + − − + − −
2 − + − − − + −
13 − + − − − − −
2 − − + − + − −
6 − − + − − + −
63 − − + − − − −
19 − − − − + − −
3 − − − − − + −
Open in a new tab

+Positive.

−Negative.

Phylogenetic analysis of non-O157 STEC by MLST

Ninety-four sequence types (STs) were obtained from the 301 non-O157 STEC isolates. ST710 (27 isolates) and ST993 (19 isolates) were most common, followed by ST155 (15 isolates), ST906 (12 isolates), ST13 (10 isolates), ST540 (10 isolates), and ST3628 (9 isolates). Three STs (ST25, ST88, and ST2514) contained eight isolates each; ST56, ST297, and ST3692 contained seven isolates each; ST446 and ST953 contained six isolates each. Further, six STs (ST33, ST40, ST206, ST1001, ST3883, and ST4441) were detected in five isolates each; five STs (ST10, ST162, ST937, ST1611, and ST3629) contained four isolates each; six STs contained three isolates each; while 12 STs contained two isolates each and 50 STs were found only once (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic tree based on concatenated sequences of seven housekeeping genes of all 301 isolates by the Neighbor−joining method using MEGA 6. Numbers on the tree indicate bootstrap values calculated for 1000 subsets for branch points >50%. For sequence types that consisted of more than one isolates, the number of isolates for individual profiles is provided in brackets. aOrigin of isolation: Y, yak; P, pika; A, antelope; C, cattle; G, goat; PG, pig; D, diarrheal patients; H, healthy carriers; RB, raw beef; RM, raw mutton; RP, raw pork; RC, raw chicken; and RD, raw duck.

Isolates from various sources or same host were widely distributed across a phylogenetic tree; this demonstrates the high genetic diversity. There were isolates recovered from yak and pika samples in the same unique ecosystem (Qinghai-Tibetan plateau) that shared same STs (i.e., ST40, ST297, ST773, ST906, ST1001, ST3686, ST3692, ST3883, and ST3885). Three subsets of STs (i.e., ST56, ST3684, ST223, and ST5741; ST737, ST297, and ST2097; ST1001 and ST3881) from both yak and pika were grouped on similar branches. Notably, four isolates of ST3692, three from yaks and one from pika, shared the same serotype (O2:H45), stx subtype (stx1a only), and virulence gene composition (Figure 1 and Table S1). ST88, ST206, ST361, ST641, ST710, and ST953 contained isolates from both pig feces and pork, all of which only carried stx2e. A subset of STs (ST1611, ST26, ST101, and ST6358) within a cluster contained isolates from cattle feces and beef. The 24 isolates from diarrheal patients assigned to 13 STs were scattered throughout the phylogenetic tree. Isolate STEC408 from a diarrheal patient sampled in Shanghai city shared the same sequence type (ST155), serotype (O21:H25), stx subtype (stx1a only) and virulence profiles with four isolates from goats sampled in Henan province (STEC012, STEC013, STEC014, and STEC021). Similarly, isolate STEC409 from a diarrheal patient in Shanghai city had the same sequence type (ST993), serotype (ONT:H30), and stx subtype (stx2e only) as 13 pig-derived isolates sampled in Beijing city and Chongqing city, all of which possessed none of the virulence genes tested (Figure 1 and Table S1). A subset of STs (ST33, ST40, and ST937) isolated from healthy carriers were also found in isolates from raw meats, goat, yak, pika and antelope. Of these, ST33 of a healthy carrier (STEC435) in Qinghai province had the same serotype O91:H14 as isolated from goat and mutton; it also had the same stx subtype as the mutton isolate STEC362. ST40 from a healthy carrier (STEC438) in Shenzhen city had the same serotype and stx subtype as a mutton isolate (STEC317) sampled in Beijing city (Figure 1 and Table S1).

Comparison of STEC isolates with highly pathogenic STEC isolates

We constructed an MST containing 94 STs of various non-O157 STEC in our study, 32 STs from the HUSEC collection, and 36 human STEC STs of O157 and the top six serogroups from the E. coli MLST database to assess the potential risk for human infection (Figure 2). Four STs (i.e., ST16, ST21, ST306, and ST342) from diarrheal patients were observed in human STECs; ST21 contained three O26:H11 isolates that carried the stx1a, eae, ehxA, toxB, efa1, and paa genes. Isolates of ST40 from healthy carrier, raw mutton, pika, and yak samples were found in the HUSEC collection. Among these, the isolate from yak (MN1205-30) carried stx1a, stx2d, ehxA, and saa; the isolate from mutton (STEC317) harbored stx1c and saa; while none of the three isolates (two from pika and one from healthy carrier) possessed any of the virulence genes tested in this study except for stx (Figure 2 and Table S1). Moreover, ST25 from the goat and raw meat (beef and mutton) isolates, ST56 from the yak isolates, ST342 and ST675 from the raw mutton isolates shared the same STs with HUSEC collection (Figure 2). The isolates from these reservoirs had variability in the presence of virulence genes; particularly, ST25 from a goat isolate (STEC006) was assigned to the pathogenic serotype O45:H2, carrying stx1c, stx2d, and ehxA genes. Five isolates from antelope (STEC477), goat (STEC007 and STEC009), healthy carrier (STEC435), and raw mutton (STEC362) had the same ST (ST33) as human STECs; four of these isolates were the serotype O91:H14, which is one of the most common serotypes in human pathogenic eae-negative STEC strains; while one isolate from antelope (STEC477) was assigned to serotype O50:H14 (Table S1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Minimum spanning tree of 94 STs from this study, 32 STs from the HUSEC collection (blue), and 36 STs from human STEC STs of serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157 in the E. coli MLST database (red). Each circle represents an ST with the size being proportional to the number of isolates. The colors for the slices of the pie represent the sources of the isolates (see labeling in the upper right corner). The numbers on the connecting lines represent the number of allelic differences between two STs.

Discussion

In this study, we performed a detailed analysis of the molecular epidemiology of non-O157 STEC in China, using a collection of 301 STEC isolates recovered from fecal samples (i.e., yak, pika, antelope, pig, cattle, goat, diarrheal patients, and healthy carriers) and raw meats. The prevalence of STEC in yak, pika, pig, cattle, and raw meats samples was 17.58, 1.99, 9.27, 2.73, and 7.4%, respectively (Bai et al., 2013, 2015, 2016; Meng et al., 2014); the number of goat and antelope samples was not applicable (Table 1). Additionally, we recovered 11 isolates from 870 diarrheal patients. These samples had a positive rate of 1.26%, which was lower than the rate for animal samples, but slightly higher than the rate reported in other studies in China (0.1–0.57%) (Chen et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2015). This is the first investigation of STEC prevalence in healthy human population in China. Only 3 isolates were recovered from 1058 fecal samples (0.28%) of healthy carriers, indicating that STEC are uncommon in the healthy human population. Notably, it was also the first report worldwide on STEC recovery from Tibetan antelopes (Pantholops hodgsonii) living on plateaus with elevations between 3500 and 5500 m, a low partial pressure of oxygen, and high ultraviolet radiation levels, and follows up on our previous studies of STEC in yak and pika residing in the similar extremely harsh wild environments (Bai et al., 2013, 2015). This is of interest as it does indicate that wild animals in these environments are natural reservoirs of STEC, and extending our knowledge of the reservoir host range of STEC.

A high diversity of serotypes was observed among isolates. Some serotypes tended to be reservoirs-specific; for example, serotypes O20:H30, O2:H32, and O100:H20 were only detected in pig isolates; serotypes O15:H21, O45:H2, and O103:H8 were only detected in goat isolates; serotypes O78:H8, and O117:H21 were only detected in yak isolates. The O serogroups could not be determined for 20.93% (63/301) of the isolates, which may represent emerging serogroups or serotypes; however, the potential for causing human infection remains unknown. Even though hundreds of non-O157 serotypes have been described, serotypes O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145 have been suggested to be the most important for human health (Brooks et al., 2005). In this study, there were isolates recovered from diarrheal patients, goat, and pork that were assigned to these highly pathogenic serogroups, including O26, O45, O103, O111, and O121. However, none of the STEC isolates from antelope, pika, yak, pig, or healthy carriers belonged to these serotypes; this implies that most animals and healthy carriers are not reservoirs of the predominant serotypes. Whereas, some of the serotypes identified in this study, including O8:H2 from pika, O8:H19 from pork and yak, O22:H8 from yak and cattle, O118:H16 from goat, O128:H2 from beef and mutton, and O163:H19 from pika have been previously isolated from human infections with hemolytic uremic syndrome (Hussein, 2007).

Shiga toxin subtypes have been implicated in severe outcome of STEC infection. Stx2 is more frequently associated with disease than Stx1, while Stx2a, Stx2c, and Stx2d are more commonly associated with HC and HUS. The remaining subtypes are only found in patients with uncomplicated diarrhea (Fuller et al., 2011; Melton-Celsa, 2014; Fruth et al., 2015). Swine STEC isolates commonly produce Stx2e, which may cause edema disease in weaned pigs (Meisen et al., 2013; Tseng et al., 2014). In this study, we found some highly pathogenic stx compositions (i.e., stx1a, stx2a, stx2c, stx2d, stx1a+stx2a, stx2a+stx2c, stx2a+stx2d, and stx1a+stx2a+stx2b) that were linked to severe human illness. Almost all animal isolates, with the exception of pig-derived isolates, support our hypothesis that pig-derived STEC isolates have a low potential for causing human disease (Meng et al., 2014). The combination of both stx and eae genes has been associated with enhanced virulence and increased severity of clinical infections in humans (Werber et al., 2003). We observed 11 isolates (five from diarrheal patients, four from raw meats, one from cattle, and one from yak) that carried eae; all were ehxA positive. Notably, toxB was detected in three O26:H11 isolates from diarrheal patients and efa1 was positive in seven isolates; these isolates belonged to the serotypes O26:H11 (3), O111:H8, O5:HNT, O5:H9, and O78:HNT. This founding supports the notion that the putative adhesion genes toxB and efa1 are present mainly in isolates of highly prevalent and pathogenic serotypes that are eae positive (Toma et al., 2004); thus, this is an indicator of high risk for human illness.

MLST has been proposed as an adequate tool for producing genetic profiles for a vast number of isolates, especially under non-epidemic circumstances (Ferdous et al., 2016). In this study, a substantial genetic diversity was observed in 301 non-O157 STEC isolates collected from various sources. Although there were no clear phylogenetic clusters for the majority of isolates and no clear correlations were either observed between ST, serotype or stx subtype, the strains did cluster based on geographic location or animal species. We observed that a subset of isolates recovered from yak and pika in the same unique ecosystem, the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau, shared same STs and were more likely to cluster together. Thus, it is possible that some isolates persist in specific environments and are transmitted locally within intraspecies and interspecies. A similar correlation was also observed in isolates derived from the same animal species regardless of whether they arise from feces or animal meat, e.g., feces of pig and pork or feces of cattle and beef, indicating that most STEC infections due to animal-derived foodstuffs might be traced back to the food producing animals as a specific source, instead of an entry from environmental or human sources along the food chain. Notably, isolates obtained from diarrheal patients did not belong to a specific phylogenetic cluster and were scattered throughout the phylogenetic tree. Furthermore, isolates from goats, pigs, and raw meats were genetically similar to those from human-derived isolates based on MLST, serotypes and virulence profiles, regardless of geographic locations. This also supports the notion of STEC transmission from livestock or raw meats to humans; nevertheless, the transmission route is still unclear and warrants further investigation.

An analysis of non-O157 STEC isolates in this study against the HUSEC collection, and human STECs of O157 and the top six serogroups revealed that some STEC isolates from diarrheal patients, healthy carriers, goats, pikas, yaks, and raw meats were closely related to pathogenic STEC isolates. Moreover, when combined with serotyping and virulence analysis, it is clear that isolates from diarrheal patients, goats, yaks, and raw meats are more likely to possess highly pathogenic serotypes that have been associated with severe diseases including O26:H11, O111:H8, O45:H2, O91:H14, and O8:H19 (Hussein, 2007; Bielaszewska et al., 2009), as well as combinations of highly pathogenic stx subtypes and virulence gene panels. These data suggest that diarrheal patients, goats, yaks, and raw meats are the important reservoirs of pathogenic STEC strains; while, isolates from antelopes, pikas, pigs, cattle, and healthy carriers likely pose low risks to human health. Given that non-O157 STEC strains are oral-fecal organisms, it is urgent to monitor the local human population for STEC infections, which may be acquired by direct contact with infected patients, wild, or domestic animals as well as consumption of contaminated animal-derived foodstuffs.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first and largest survey to systematically analyze the molecular and phylogenetic features of non-O157 STEC strains in China. Our survey indicates that non-O157 STEC are widely distributed across multiple sources and regions in China. MLST analysis, serotyping, stx subtyping, and virulence gene profiling suggest that STEC from different resources across China are highly genetically diverse, that transmission may occur within intraspecies or interspecies, and there is potential for human infections to originate from animal reservoirs or animal-derived foodstuffs. The pathogenicity varied across isolates from different sources. Further work should involve investigation of the epidemiological role of animal reservoirs and animal-derived foodstuffs in the maintenance of STEC, and the genetic markers that related to pathogenicity to determine the direction of transmission and differentiate low- and high-risk non-O157 STEC infections.

Author contributions

XB, SL and YX designed the project; XB, YX, YJ, HW, QG, BH, SL, and XX carried out the sampling work; XB, BH, YXu, AZ, HS, PB, SF, and RF carried out the experiments and generated data; XB, SL, and YX analyzed data and drafted the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81371762), the State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control (2015SKLID504), and the National Basic Research Priorities Program of China (2015CB554201).

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcimb.2016.00143/full#supplementary-material

Table S1

Characterization of 301 non−O157 STEC isolates analyzed in this study.

Click here for additional data file. (38.1KB, XLSX)

References

  1. Bai X., Wang H., Xin Y., Wei R., Tang X., Zhao A., et al. (2015). Prevalence and characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail raw meats in China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 200, 31–38. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.01.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bai X., Zhang W., Tang X., Xin Y., Xu Y., Sun H., et al. (2016). Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Plateau Pika (Ochotona curzoniae) on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Front. Microbiol. 7:375. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bai X., Zhao A., Lan R., Xin Y., Xie H., Meng Q., et al. (2013). Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in yaks (Bos grunniens) from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. PLoS ONE 8:e65537. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bibbal D., Loukiadis E., Kérourédan M., Ferré F., Dilasser F., Peytavin de Garam C., et al. (2015). Prevalence of carriage of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serotypes O157:H7, O26:H11, O103:H2, O111:H8, and O145:H28 among slaughtered adult cattle in France. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 1397–1405. 10.1128/AEM.03315-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bielaszewska M., Stoewe F., Fruth A., Zhang W., Prager R., Brockmeyer J., et al. (2009). Shiga toxin, cytolethal distending toxin, and hemolysin repertoires in clinical Escherichia coli O91 isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47, 2061–2066. 10.1128/JCM.00201-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blanco J. E., Blanco M., Alonso M. P., Mora A., Dahbi G., Coira M. A., et al. (2004). Serotypes, virulence genes, and intimin types of Shiga toxin (verotoxin)-producing Escherichia coli isolates from human patients: prevalence in Lugo, Spain, from 1992 through 1999. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42, 311–319. 10.1128/JCM.42.1.311-319.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brooks J. T., Sowers E. G., Wells J. G., Greene K. D., Griffin P. M., Hoekstra R. M., et al. (2005). Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections in the United States, 1983–2002. J. Infect. Dis. 192, 1422–1429. 10.1086/466536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chandran A., Mazumder A. (2013). Prevalence of diarrhea-associated virulence genes and genetic diversity in Escherichia coli isolates from fecal material of various animal hosts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 7371–7380. 10.1128/AEM.02653-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen Y., Chen X., Zheng S., Yu F., Kong H., Yang Q., et al. (2014). Serotypes, genotypes and antimicrobial resistance patterns of human diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli isolates circulating in southeastern China. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20, 52–58. 10.1111/1469-0691.12188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Conrad C. C., Stanford K., McAllister T. A., Thomas J., Reuter T. (2014). Further development of sample preparation and detection methods for O157 and the top 6 non-O157 STEC serogroups in cattle feces. J. Microbiol. Methods 105, 22–30. 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Coombes B. K., Wickham M. E., Mascarenhas M., Gruenheid S., Finlay B. B., Karmali M. A. (2008). Molecular analysis as an aid to assess the public health risk of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 2153–2160. 10.1128/AEM.02566-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elliott S. J., Sperandio V., Girón J. A., Shin S., Mellies J. L., Wainwright L., et al. (2000). The locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE)-encoded regulator controls expression of both LEE- and non-LEE-encoded virulence factors in enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 68, 6115–6126. 10.1128/IAI.68.11.6115-6126.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Farfan M. J., Torres A. G. (2012). Molecular mechanisms that mediate colonization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains. Infect. Immun. 80, 903–913. 10.1128/IAI.05907-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferdous M., Friedrich A. W., Grundmann H., de Boer R. F., Croughs P. D., Islam M. A., et al. (2016). Molecular characterization and phylogeny of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolates obtained from two Dutch regions using whole genome sequencing. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 22, 642.e1–642.e9. 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fields P. I., Blom K., Hughes H. J., Helsel L. O., Feng P., Swaminathan B. (1997). Molecular characterization of the gene encoding H antigen in Escherichia coli and development of a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism test for identification of E. coli O157:H7 and O157:NM. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35, 1066–1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fruth A., Prager R., Tietze E., Rabsch W., Flieger A. (2015). Molecular epidemiological view on Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli causing human disease in Germany: Diversity, prevalence, and outbreaks. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 305, 697–704. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2015.08.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fuller C. A., Pellino C. A., Flagler M. J., Strasser J. E., Weiss A. A. (2011). Shiga toxin subtypes display dramatic differences in potency. Infect. Immun. 79, 1329–1337. 10.1128/IAI.01182-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Galli L., Miliwebsky E., Irino K., Leotta G., Rivas M. (2010). Virulence profile comparison between LEE-negative Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains isolated from cattle and humans. Vet. Microbiol. 143, 307–313. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.11.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hussein H. S. (2007). Prevalence and pathogenicity of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef cattle and their products. J. Anim. Sci. 85, E63–E72. 10.2527/jas.2006-421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Iguchi A., Iyoda S., Seto K., Morita-Ishihara T., Scheutz F., Ohnishi M., et al. (2015). Escherichia coli O-Genotyping PCR: a comprehensive and practical platform for molecular O Serogrouping. J. Clin. Microbiol. 53, 2427–2432. 10.1128/JCM.00321-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiang C., An T., Wang S., Wang G., Si W., Tu Y., et al. (2015). Role of the ehxA gene from Escherichia coli serotype O82 in hemolysis, biofilm formation, and in vivo virulence. Can. J. Microbiol. 61, 335–341. 10.1139/cjm-2014-0824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Joensen K. G., Tetzschner A. M., Iguchi A., Aarestrup F. M., Scheutz F. (2015). Rapid and Easy in silico serotyping of Escherichia coli isolates by use of whole-genome sequencing data. J. Clin. Microbiol. 53, 2410–2426. 10.1128/JCM.00008-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson K. E., Thorpe C. M., Sears C. L. (2006). The emerging clinical importance of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Clin. Infect. Dis. 43, 1587–1595. 10.1086/509573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Käppeli U., Hächler H., Giezendanner N., Beutin L., Stephan R. (2011). Human infections with non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Switzerland, 2000–2009. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17, 180–185. 10.3201/eid1702.100909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Karmali M. A., Mascarenhas M., Shen S., Ziebell K., Johnson S., Reid-Smith R., et al. (2003). Association of genomic O island 122 of Escherichia coli EDL 933 with verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli seropathotypes that are linked to epidemic and/or serious disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 4930–4940. 10.1128/JCM.41.11.4930-4940.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Meisen I., Rosenbrück R., Galla H. J., Hüwel S., Kouzel I. U., Mormann M., et al. (2013). Expression of Shiga toxin 2e glycosphingolipid receptors of primary porcine brain endothelial cells and toxin-mediated breakdown of the blood-brain barrier. Glycobiology 23, 745–759. 10.1093/glycob/cwt013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mellmann A., Bielaszewska M., Köck R., Friedrich A. W., Fruth A., Middendorf B., et al. (2008). Analysis of collection of hemolytic uremic syndrome-associated enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 14, 1287–1290. 10.3201/eid1408.071082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Melton-Celsa A. R. (2014). Shiga Toxin (Stx) classification, structure, and function. Microbiol. Spectr. 2:EHEC-0024-2013. 10.1128/microbiolspec.ehec-0024-2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Meng Q., Bai X., Zhao A., Lan R., Du H., Wang T., et al. (2014). Characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from healthy pigs in China. BMC Microbiol. 14:5. 10.1186/1471-2180-14-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mora A., López C., Dhabi G., López-Beceiro A. M., Fidalgo L. E., Díaz E. A., et al. (2012). Seropathotypes, Phylogroups, Stx subtypes, and intimin types of wildlife-carried, shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains with the same characteristics as human-pathogenic isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 2578–2585. 10.1128/AEM.07520-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nicholls L., Grant T. H., Robins-Browne R. M. (2000). Identification of a novel genetic locus that is required for in vitro adhesion of a clinical isolate of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli to epithelial cells. Mol. Microbiol. 35, 275–288. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01690.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nishikawa Y., Zhou Z., Hase A., Ogasawara J., Kitase T., Abe N., et al. (2002). Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli isolated from stools of sporadic cases of diarrheal illness in Osaka City, Japan between 1997 and 2000: prevalence of enteroaggregative E. coli heat-stable enterotoxin 1 gene-possessing E. coli. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 55, 183–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Paton A. W., Srimanote P., Woodrow M. C., Paton J. C. (2001). Characterization of Saa, a novel autoagglutinating adhesin produced by locus of enterocyte effacement-negative Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli strains that are virulent for humans. Infect. Immun. 69, 6999–7009. 10.1128/IAI.69.11.6999-7009.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Scallan E., Hoekstra R. M., Angulo F. J., Tauxe R. V., Widdowson M. A., Roy S. L., et al. (2011). Foodborne illness acquired in the United States–major pathogens. Emerging Infect. Dis. 17, 7–15. 10.3201/eid1701.P11101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Scheutz F., Teel L. D., Beutin L., Piérard D., Buvens G., Karch H., et al. (2012). Multicenter evaluation of a sequence-based protocol for subtyping Shiga toxins and standardizing Stx nomenclature. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50, 2951–2963. 10.1128/JCM.00860-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Singh P., Sha Q., Lacher D. W., Del Valle J., Mosci R. E., Moore J. A., et al. (2015). Characterization of enteropathogenic and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in cattle and deer in a shared agroecosystem. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 5:29. 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith J. L., Fratamico P. M., Gunther N. W. T., IV. (2014). Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 86, 145–197. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800262-9.00003-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tatsuno I., Horie M., Abe H., Miki T., Makino K., Shinagawa H., et al. (2001). toxB gene on pO157 of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 is required for full epithelial cell adherence phenotype. Infect. Immun. 69, 6660–6669. 10.1128/IAI.69.11.6660-6669.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Toma C., Martínez Espinosa E., Song T., Miliwebsky E., Chinen I., Iyoda S., et al. (2004). Distribution of putative adhesins in different seropathotypes of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42, 4937–4946. 10.1128/JCM.42.11.4937-4946.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tozzi A. E., Caprioli A., Minelli F., Gianviti A., De Petris L., Edefonti A., et al. (2003). Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections associated with hemolytic uremic syndrome, Italy, 1988-2000. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9, 106–108. 10.3201/eid0901.020266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tseng M., Fratamico P. M., Bagi L., Delannoy S., Fach P., Manning S. D., et al. (2014). Diverse virulence gene content of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from finishing swine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 6395–6402. 10.1128/AEM.01761-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Vidotto M. C., Florian E. C., Ono M. A. (2013). Prevalence of the paa gene (porcine attaching and effacing associated) in porcine enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (PEPEC) associated with postweaning diarrhea in south Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 44, 515–517. 10.1590/S1517-83822013000200030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang X., Wang J., Sun H., Xia S., Duan R., Liang J., et al. (2015). Etiology of Childhood Infectious Diarrhea in a Developed Region of China: Compared to Childhood Diarrhea in a Developing Region and Adult Diarrhea in a Developed Region. PLoS ONE 10:e0142136. 10.1371/journal.pone.0142136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Werber D., Fruth A., Buchholz U., Prager R., Kramer M. H., Ammon A., et al. (2003). Strong association between shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 and virulence genes stx2 and eae as possible explanation for predominance of serogroup O157 in patients with haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22, 726–730. 10.1007/s10096-003-1025-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Xiong Y., Wang P., Lan R., Ye C., Wang H., Ren J., et al. (2012). A novel Escherichia coli O157:H7 clone causing a major hemolytic uremic syndrome outbreak in China. PLoS ONE 7:e36144. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yu J., Jing H., Lai S., Xu W., Li M., Wu J., et al. (2015). Etiology of diarrhea among children under the age five in China: results from a five-year surveillance. J. Infect. 71, 19–27. 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

Characterization of 301 non−O157 STEC isolates analyzed in this study.

Click here for additional data file. (38.1KB, XLSX)

Articles from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES