Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the frequency of behavioral disorders in children with significant refractive error and to compare the results with those of emmetropic children.
Methods
In this prospective, comparative study from January to September 2013, refractive errors of all 5–12-year-old children who referred to a general eye clinic were recorded. A validated Persian version of the Rutter A scale was filled out by the parents for the evaluation of the child's behavioral disorders. The Rutter A scale scores of children with significant refractive error were compared with those of emmetropic eyes. Student t test, Chi square test, and Fisher's exact test were used for analysis. Differences with a P value less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
One hundred eighty-three patients, including 101 patients with significant refractive error and 82 emmetropic subjects, were studied. Overall, 44 patients (24%) had behavioral disorders, according to the Rutter A scale scores. Thirty patients (29.7%) with significant refractive error and 14 emmetropic subjects (16.9%) had behavioral disorders (P = 0.043). The prevalence of behavioral disorders were 37.5% in hyperopia, 35.7% in hyperopia-astigmatism, 21.4% in simple astigmatism, 16.7% in myopia-astigmatism, and 14.3% in myopia. Compared with emmetropic subjects, the prevalence of behavioral disorders was statistically significantly higher only in patients with hyperopia and hyperopia-astigmatism (P = 0.019 and P = 0.040).
Conclusion
The prevalence of behavioral disorders is higher in children with hyperopia and hyperopia-astigmatism.
Keywords: Refractive errors, Behavioral disorder, Hyperopia, Hyperopia astigmatism
Introduction
Childhood behavioral disorders consist of a large group of behavior and mental conditions with reported incidence of 10–26% in different parts of the world.1 Pediatric behavioral disorders have a negative effect on education and social functioning and may end in premature termination of education, anti-social behaviors, and substance abuse.2, 3 Environmental and biological factors may have a causative and predisposing role for childhood behavioral disorders, and higher incidences have been shown in some physical diseases and disabilities.4, 5
High refractive errors in children may be associated with blurred vision, eye strain, ocular pain, headache, and even amblyopia and strabismus.6 Children with high refractive errors may have intellectual disabilities, incompatibility in school and society, and less interest for education.6, 7 Previous studies have reported a higher incidence of child behavioral disorders in visually impaired children and those with convergence insufficiency.5, 7, 8 To the best of our knowledge, there is no report on the incidence of behavioral disorders in school children with significant refractive errors.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of behavioral disorders in 5–12-year-old children who have significant refractive errors.
Methods
In this case–control study between January to September 2013, all 5–12-years old children who were examined in a private general eye clinic in Tehran were evaluated. The study was approved by the Iran University of Medical Sciences Eye Research Center Ethics Committee, and informed consents were obtained.
Complete ophthalmic examination including evaluation of best corrected visual acuity, manifest and cycloplegic refraction, ocular motility, and slit lamp and dilated fundus examination was performed. Children with chronic systemic or ocular diseases, psychiatric drug use, or history of trauma were excluded. Also, patients with any structural ocular disease were excluded.
For cycloplegic refraction, one drop of cyclopentolate 1% was instilled in both eyes and repeated after 5 min. After 45 min, the average of at least 3 auto-refraction of each eye was recorded using a Topcon 7000 A autorefractometer (Topcon Inc. Japan).
Significant refractive error was defined according to the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) Vision Screening Committee criteria.9 Based on cyclorefraction, the hyperopic group consisted of the spherical equivalent of ≥ +3.50 diopters (D), the myopic group was considered as eyes with a spherical equivalent ≤ −3.00 D, and the astigmatic group consisted of eyes with the astigmatism more than 1.50D in vertical meridian (90′±20) or horizontal meridian (180′±20) or more than 1.00 D in oblique meridian (20′-70′ or 110′-160′). The eyes were considered emmetropic if spherical equivalent of refractive error or astigmatism were between −1.00D and +1.00 D. Included eyes should have bilaterally the same type of significant refractive errors.
For each child, one of the parents completed a validated Persian translation of Rutter's children's behavior questionnaire for evaluation (Rutter A Scale). Rutter A Scale has 31 questions in total and is divided into three sections. The first section has eight questions about somatic problems and truancy from school; the second section has five questions about difficulties in speech, eating, and sleeping; and the third section consists of 18 descriptions of abnormal behaviors. The parents were asked to indicate ‘0 = does not apply’ or ‘1 = applies somewhat’ or ‘2 = definitely applies” for each question. The total scores were calculated, and scores greater than 13 indicated behavioral disorder.10 Validity of this translated questionnaire has been previously shown in Iran.11
Data were analyzed using SPSSs software (version 21, SPSS, IBM Inc., Chicago, IL). Student t test, Chi square test, and Fisher's exact test were used for analysis. Differences with a P value less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Overall, 183 subjects including 101 cases with significant refractive error (refractive group) and 82 emmetropic cases (emmetropic group) were evaluated. Table 1 shows characteristics of the subjects. The sex and age were statistically similar between the two groups (P = 0.558 and P = 0.318, respectively).
Table 1.
All cases | Significant refractive error group | Emmetropic group | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number | 183 | 101 | 82 | – |
Age (year)a | 8.26 ± 2.21 | 8.41 ± 2.39 | 8.08 ± 1.97 | 0.318b |
Sex (male/female) | 105/78 | 56/45 | 49/33 | 0.558c |
Spherical equivalent refractive error (Diopters)a | 0.55 ± 0.49 | 2.10 ± 3.49 | 0.25 ± 0.30 | <0.001b |
Rutter A Scale scorea | 8.60 ± 6.89 | 9.53 ± 7.15 | 7.45 ± 9.53 | 0.039b |
Abnormal Rutter A Scale score | 44 (23.9%) | 30 (29.7%) | 14 (17.1%) | 0.043c |
Mean ± standard deviation.
t test.
Chi square test.
Based on the Rutter A Scale scores, 44 children (24%) had behavioral disorders (Table 1). Of these, 30 cases (68.2%) were in the refractive group, and 14 cases (31.8%) in the emmetropic group (P = 0.043, odds ratio 2.05 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.003–4.201).
Subgroup analysis revealed behavioral disorders in 1 of 7 myopic (14.3%), 12 of 32 hyperopic (37.5%), 6 of 28 simple astigmatic (21.4%), 1 of 6 myopia-astigmatic (16.7%), and 10 of 28 hyperopia-astigmatic (35.7%) subjects. The difference was statistically significant for hyperopia and hyperopia-astigmatic groups (P = 0.019 and P = 0.040, respectively, Table 2).
Table 2.
Hyperopic group | Myopic group | Simple astigmatic group | Myopia astigmatic group | Hyperopia astigmatic group | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | 32 | 7 | 28 | 6 | 28 |
Age (year)a | 8.34 ± 2.45 | 8.85 ± 2.85 | 8.71 ± 2.53 | 8.00 ± 1.26 | 8.07 ± 1.97 |
P = 0.567b | P = 0.341b | P = 0.180b | P = 0.917b | P = 0.838b | |
Sex (male/female) | 21/11 | 4/3 | 15/13 | 2/4 | 14/14 |
P = 0.560c | P = 0.960d | P = 0.571c | P = 0.210d | P = 0.372c | |
Refractive error (diopters)a | 4.50 ± 1.42 | −3.31 ± 0.77 | −0.11 ± 1.07 | −5.11 ± 1.67 | 4.68 ± 1.68 |
Rutter A Scale scorea | 10.19 ± 7.87 | 10.44 ± 5.44 | 7.57 ± 6.35 | 7.65 ± 5.70 | 10.93 ± 7.60 |
P = 0.058b | P = 0.237b | P = 0.932b | P = 0.936b | P = 0.020b | |
Abnormal Rutter A Scale score | 12 (37.5%) | 1 (14.3%) | 6 (21.4%) | 1 (16.7%) | 10 (35.7%) |
P = 0.019c | P = 0.852d | P = 0.610c | P = 0.980d | P = 0.040c |
Mean ± standard deviation.
t test.
Chi square test.
Fisher's exact test.
Discussion
Our study showed that the rate of behavioral disorder based on the Rutter A scale questionnaire is higher in children with significant refractive error. The Rutter questionnaires consist of two sets of questions which give an index of behavioral disorders in children. The Rutter scale questionnaire “A” was completed by one of the parents, and the scale “B” was completed by the teacher. In our clinic, children referred from different parts of the city, and access to the teachers was difficult. Therefore, we chose scale A for evaluation of the child's behavioral disorders. Several studies confirmed the validity of the questionnaire in different countries, including Iran.10, 11, 12 We found a rate of 17% for behavioral disorders in emmetropic children. This rate is similar to the rate reported by previous screening studies in different countries (4–23%).1, 13, 14, 15, 16 The rate of behavioral disorders in our study was higher in the hyperopic and hyperopia-astigmatic groups (37.5% and 35.7%, respectively).
Two studies reported refractive error of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (a subtype of behavior disorder) and yielded conflicting results. Mezer and Wygnanski-Jaffe17 evaluated ocular features in a series of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and reported significant ametropia in 42 children (83%). Conversely, Fabian et al.18 reported children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder had similar refractive errors as normal subjects.
There is no clear explanation for the higher rates of behavior disorders in children with significant refractive error, especially those with hyperopia and hyperopia-astigmatism. It is known that various brain centers and cortical networks control both visual function and behavior. Dysfunction of a part of the brain may affect other functions, such as attention, through unknown center and pathways.19 Alternatively, behavioral disorders and refractive error may have a common genetic predisposition.19, 20, 21
The present study has several limitations. The sample size is small, and the study population may not represent the true urban population. The small number of children in some subgroups may explain the statistically non-significant results. The Rutter questionnaire is a screening tool and has not been designed to detect a specific behavioral disorder such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, etc. Clinical examination is the standard of care for the detection of the specific behavioral disorder. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm the findings of our study.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology.
None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.
References
- 1.Akpan M.U., Ojinnaka N.C., Ekanem E. Behavioural problems among schoolchildren in Nigeria. South Africa J Pediatr. 2010;16:50–55. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Simonoff E., Elander J., Holmshaw J. Predictors of antisocial personality continuities from childhood to adult life. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;184:118–127. doi: 10.1192/bjp.184.2.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stein D.S., Blum N.J., Barbaresi W.J. Developmental and behavioral disorders through the life span. Pediatrics. 2011;128:364–373. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eaves L.J., Silberg J.L., Meyer J.M. Genetics and developmental psychopathology: 2. The main effects of genes and environment on behavioral problems in the Virginia twin study of adolescent behavioral development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997;38:965–980. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01614.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Termote J., Schalij-Delfos N.E., Donders A.R., Cats B.P. The incidence of visually impaired children with retinopathy of prematurity and their concomitant disabilities. J AAPOS. 2003;7:131–136. doi: 10.1016/mpa.2003.S1091853102420083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Arsen A., Ozgur O., OzlemHekim B. Refractive errors and ocular findings in children with intellectual disability: A controlled study. J AAPOS. 2008;12:477–481. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zaba J.N. Social, emotional, and educational consequences of undetected children's vision problems. J Behav Optom. 2001;12(3):66–70. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Granet D.B., Gomi C.F., Ventura R., Miller-Scholte A. The relationship between convergence insufficiency and ADHD. Strabismus. 2005;13:163–168. doi: 10.1080/09273970500455436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Donahue S.P., Arnold R.W., Ruben J.B. Preschool vision screening: what should we be detecting and how should we report it? Uniform guidelines for reporting results of preschool vision screening studies. J AAPOS. 2003;7:314–316. doi: 10.1016/s1091-8531(03)00182-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Elander J., Rutter M. Use and development of the Rutter parents' and teachers' scales. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1996;6:63–78. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Parvaresh N., Bahramnezhad A. Post-traumatic stress disorder in bam-survived students who immigrated to Kerman, four months after the earthquake. Arch Iran Med. 2009;12:244–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wong C.K. The rutter parent scale A2 and teacher scale B2 in Chinese. I. Translation study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1988;77(6):724–728. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1988.tb05194.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Costello E., Mustillo S., Erkanli A., Keeler G., Angold A. Prevalence and development of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(8):837–844. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.8.837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alavi A., Mohammadi M.R., Joshaghani N., Mahmoudi-Gharaei J. Frequency of psychological disorders amongst children in urban areas of tehran. Iran J Psychiatry. 2010;5(2):55–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Eapen V., al-Gazali L., Bin-Othman S., Abou-Saleh M. Mental health problems among schoolchildren in United Arab Emirates: prevalence and risk factors. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998;37:880–886. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199808000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Eapen V., Swadi H., Sabri S., Abou-Saleh M. Childhood behavioural disturbance in a community sample in Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates. East Mediterr Health J. 2001;7:428–434. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mezer E., Wygnanski-Jaffe T. Do children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder have ocular abnormalities? Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22:931–935. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fabian I.D., Kinori M., Ancri O. The possible association of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with undiagnosed refractive errors. J AAPOS. 2013;17:507–551. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kaplan S. Uniting behavioral optometry with neurology and genetics. J Behav Optom. 1998;9:93–98. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stambolian D. Genetic susceptibility and mechanisms for refractive error. Clin Genet. 2013;84(2):102–108. doi: 10.1111/cge.12180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Comings D.E. Genetic aspects of childhood behavioral disorders. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1997;27(3):139–150. doi: 10.1007/BF02353694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]