Skip to main content
. 2016 May 14;7(24):37238–37249. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9361

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses ZC3H15 for DFS or OS of patients(n=261).

Variables DFS OS
Hazard ratio (95% CI)* p Value Hazard ratio (95% CI)* p Value
Univariate analysis
ZC3H15(low vs high) 1.789(1.301-2.460) 0.0003 1.588(1.114-2.264) 0.0105
Gender (male vs female) 0.950(0.583-1.549) 0.8377 1.167(0.692-1.966) 0.5624
Age, years (<40 vs 40-60 vs >60) 1.065(0.834-1.359) 0.6156 0.989(0.751-1.304) 0.94
Child-Pugh Classification(A vs B) 1.580(0.978-2.551) 0.0614 1.675(0.992-2.830) 0.0538
Serum AFP, ng/ml (>20 vs≤20) 1.405(1.025-1.927) 0.0348 1.262(0.887-1.795) 0.1959
HBV (negative vs positive) 2.347(1.332-4.136) 0.0032 2.113(1.109-4.026) 0.0229
Histological grading(well vs moderate vs poorly) 1.397(0.875-2.230) 0.1616 1.219(0.726-2.046) 0.4548
Largest tumor size, cm(<3 vs 3-10 vs >10) 1.664(1.311-2.112) <0.0001 1.957(1.488-2.573) <0.0001
Presence of satellite nodules (negative vs positive) 1.212(0.860-1.708) 0.2719 1.043(0.717-1.518) 0.8254
Vascular invasion(negative vs positive) 1.669(1.221-2.282) 0.0013 1.712(1.201-2.442) 0.003
HbeAg(negative vs positive) 1.691(1.207-2.369) 0.0022 1.523(1.046-2.218) 0.0283
Tumorous number 1.334(0.927-1.920) 0.1212 1.511(1.020-2.238) 0.0394
UICC stage (I+II vs III+IV) 1.943(1.380-2.737) 0.0001 2.310(1.599-3.339) <0.0001
Multivariate analysis
ZC3H15(low vs high) 1.789(1.298-2.466) 0.0004 1.613(1.120-2.322) 0.0101
Gender (male vs female) NA
Age, years (<40 vs 40-60 vs >60) NA
Child-Pugh Classification(A vs B) NA 2.038(1.182-3.513) 0.0104*
Serum AFP, ng/ml (>20 vs≤20) NA
HBV (negative vs positive) 2.494(1.378-4.517) 0.0025 2.433(1.227-4.822) 0.0109
Histological grading(well vs moderate vs poorly) NA
Largest tumor size, cm(<3 vs 3-10 vs >10) 1.866(1.442-2.415) <0.0001 2.253(1.661-3.055) <0.0001
Presence of satellite nodules (negative vs positive) NA
Vascular invasion(negative vs positive) NA
HbeAg(negative vs positive) 1.641(1.161-2.319) 0.005
Tumorous number NA
UICC stage (I+II vs III+IV) 1.751(1.224-2.503) 0.0021 2.365(1.601-3.492) <0.0001
*

For ZC3H15, median values were used as the cut-off point for definition of subgroups (low expression and high expression groups).

Univariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression; Multivariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression; Variables were adopted in multivariate analysis for their prognostic significance by univariate analysis.