Skip to main content
American Journal of Translational Research logoLink to American Journal of Translational Research
. 2016 Oct 15;8(10):4455–4463.

VNN1 overexpression is associated with poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy and adverse prognosis in patients with rectal cancers

Chi-Yung Chai 1, Yimin Zhang 1, Junlong Song 1, Shih-Chun Lin 2, Shengrong Sun 1, I-Wei Chang 2,3
PMCID: PMC5095339  PMID: 27830030

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer is prevalent worldwide and it is also the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality. For rectal cancer, neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by radical proctectomy is gold standard treatment for patients with stage II/III rectal cancer. By data mining a public dataset of rectal cancer transcriptome (GSE35452) from Gene Expression Omnibus, National Center of Biotechnology Information (GEO, NCBI), we identified that VNN1 was the most significantly upregulated gene among those related to nitrogen compound metabolic process (GO:0006807). Therefore, we analyzed the clinicopathological correlation and prognostic impact of VNN1 protein (pantetheinase), which encoded by VNN1 gene. Methods: VNN1 immunostaining was performed in 172 rectal adenocarcinomas treated with preoperative CCRT followed by surgery, which were bisected into high- and low-expression subgroups. Furthermore, statistical analyses were performed to correlate the relationship between VNN1 immunoreactivity and clinicopathological features, as well as three survival indices: disease-specific survival (DSS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and metastasis-free survival (MeFS). Results: High VNN1 immunoexpression was significantly associated with advanced pre-treatment and post-treatment disease and poor response to CCRT (all P ≤ .026). In addition, VNN1 overexpression was linked to adverse DSS, LRFS and MeFS in univariate analysis and served as an independent prognosticator indicating worse DSS and LRFS in multivariate analysis (all P ≤ .019). Conclusion: VNN1 may play a crucial role in rectal cancer progression and responsiveness to CCRT, and serve as a novel prognostic biomarker. Additional studies to clarify the molecular pathway are essential for developing potential VNN1-targeted therapies for rectal cancer.

Keywords: CCRT, chemoradiotherapy, pantetheinase, rectal cancer, VNN1

Introduction

Colorectal adenocarcinoma is worldwide prevalent. It is ranked as the third most common cancer in men and the second in women, especially in the more developed countries [1]. The incidence also became much higher in Chinese population recently [2]. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy have been shown to have prognostic benefit for patients with rectal cancer of cT3/cT4 or nodal metastasis (stage II/III) [3,4]. Nevertheless, the five-year survival rate is still unsatisfactory for all stages of colon and rectal cancer (65%) [5]. Accordingly, research and development for more effective therapeutic regimens are necessary for these patients.

Malignant tumors feature rapid growth and demand for large amount of energy and nutrients. To support viability of tumor cells and enlarge tumor biomass size in relatively nutrient-poor microenvironment, genetic or epigenetic alterations of cellular metabolism is important for oncogenesis. Nitrogen is one of the essential nutriments for organisms. Increased demand for nitrogen is also one of the hallmarks of cancer metabolism [6]. Via data mining of a Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Bethesda, MD, USA) transcriptomic database (GSE35452) with analysis of genes associated with nitrogen compound metabolic process (GO:0006807), we identified VNN1 as the most significantly upregulated gene in non-responders compared with responders.

VNN1 gene encodes pantetheinase, human analog of mouse vanin-1, which degrades pantetheine into pantothenic acid (vitamin B5) and cysteamine [7]. VNN1 gene expression level was significantly higher in blood-based samples of patients with colorectal cancer than controls [8,9]. To the best of our knowledge, however, no study investigates the relationship between VNN1 expression and response to chemoradiotherapy or survival rates. Therefore, we conducted this research.

Materials and methods

Data mining of transcriptomic database from GEO to identify the most up-regulated gene

A transcriptomic dataset (GSE35452), comprising 46 cases of rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy from GEO, NCBI, was selected for research. The tumors were dichotomized into “responder” and “non-responder” according to the response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. In this dataset, GeneChip® Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used for analysis. After downloading the raw CEL file, Nexus Expression 3 software (BioDiscovery, El Segundo, CA, USA) was used to perform comparative analysis without filtering or preselection. Under supervision, we inspected the statistical significance of each transcript by comparing responder and nonresponder, targeting the genes associated with nitrogen compound metabolic process (GO:0006807). Those genes with P-value < .01 and expression fold change > ± .1 log2 ratio were picked out for further evaluation.

Study cohort of patients and specimens

The Institutional Review Board of E-DA Hospital approved the study. Our study cohort comprised 172 patients with primary adenocarcinoma of rectum between 1998 and 2004. All the patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by radical proctectomy. The preliminary clinical staging was determined by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT). Patients with distant metastasis at initial diagnosis, screened by chest plain film and abdominopelvic CT, were excluded. The detailed patient selection and the protocol of treatment were the same as previously described [10].

Histopathological assessment, immunohistochemical study and evaluation of VNN1 expression

Post-treatment staging was based on pathological examination of radical proctectomy according to 7th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system [11]. The grading system of tumor regression after chemoradiotherapy treatment was evaluated in accordance with the description of Dworak et al. [12]. For immunohistochemical study, tissue sections of pre-treatment tumor biopsy specimens were subjected to the routine procedures of deparaffinization, rehydration, and epitope retrieval. Subsequently, the tissue sections were proceeded to incubation with primary antibody against VNN1 (1:100, rabbit polyclonal, Cat No. ab205912, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) for one hour. Splenic tissues with or without incubation of VNN1 antibody were run in parallel as positive and negative control, respectively. We evaluated the expression of VNN1 protein by combination of the intensity and percentage of immunoreactivity in the tumor cells to produce an H-score. The equation for the H-score is as follows: H-score = ∑Pi(i + 1), in which Pi represents the percentage of stained tumor cells (0%-100%) and i represents the intensity of immunostaining (0-3+).

Statistical analyses

We used SPSS V.14.0 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for statistical analysis. The VNN1 immunoreactivity median H-score was applied as the cutoff point to bisect out patient cohort into two groups, over- and under-expression. Using Pearson’s χ2 test, we compared the relationships between VNN1 expression and miscellaneous important clinical and pathological features. Three prognostic indices, disease-specific survival (DSS), local (pelvic) recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and metastasis-free survival (MeFS) intervals, were determined from the day of surgical excision to the day patient death caused by tumor, locoregional relapse of tumor, and occurrence of distant metastatic disease, respectively. For univariate survival analyses, Kaplan-Meier survival curves with comparison by log-rank test were used. Those parameters showing statistical significance in univariate analyses were enrolled in multivariate tests by using Cox proportional hazards model (Cox model). For all analyses, only P value less than .05 was judged as statistically significant under two-tailed tests.

Results

VNN1 recognized as the most significantly upregulated gene among those belonging to nitrogen compound metabolic process (GO:0006807)

In the public transcriptomic database of rectal cancer (GSE35452) from GEO, 24 out of 46 patients showed response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (responder), the rest 22 patients belonged to non-responder. Twenty probes covering 13 transcripts associated with nitrogen compound metabolic process (GO:0006807) were found. Of these, only two probes covering VNN1 transcript demonstrated significant up-regulation in non-responders than in responders (Figure 1). The log2 ratios by comparison between non-responders and responders were 0.6644- and 1.2511-fold up-regulation (P ≤ .0022, Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Analysis of gene expression in rectal cancers with neoadjuvant CCRT by using a published transcriptome dataset (GSE35452). Conducting a clustering analysis of genes by focusing on nitrogen compound metabolic process (GO:0006807) revealed that VNN1 was the most significantly upregulated genes in non-responder comparing with responder. Tissue specimens from cancers classified as responder or non-responder are illustrated at the top of the heat map, and the upregulation and downregulation of gene expression are represented as a continuum of brightness of red or green, respectively. Specimens with unchanged transcriptional level are in black.

Table 1.

Summary of differentially expressed genes associated with nitrogen compound metabolic process (GO:0006807) in relation to response to CCRT in rectal carcinoma

Probe Comparison log ratio Comparison P-value Gene Symbol Gene Name Biological Process Molecular Function
1558549_s_at 0.6644 0.0022 VNN1 Vanin 1 Cell motility, nitrogen compound metabolic process GPI anchor binding, hydrolase activity, hydrolase activity; acting on carbon-nitrogen (but not peptide) bonds, hydrolase activity; acting on carbon-nitrogen (but not peptide) bonds; in linear amides
205844_at 1.2511 0.0002 VNN1 Vanin 1 Cell motility, nitrogen compound metabolic process GPI anchor binding, hydrolase activity, hydrolase activity; acting on carbon-nitrogen (but not peptide) bonds, hydrolase activity; acting on carbon-nitrogen (but not peptide) bonds; in linear amides

Clinical and pathological features of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma

As shown in Table 2, the majority was male (n = 108, 62.8%) and less than 70 years old (n = 106, 61.6%) in our patient cohort of rectal cancer. About the pre-treatment (Pre-Tx) tumor staging, the invasive depth of 47.1% tumors (n = 81) were up to limited to muscularis propria (cT1-2), and 52.9% (n = 91) were beyond the muscularis propria (cT3-4); 27.3% (n = 47) had nodal metastasis, and 72.7% (n = 125) didn’t. About the post-treatment (Post-Tx) tumor staging, the invasive depth of 50.0% tumors (n = 86) were up to limited to muscularis propria (ypT0-2), and 50.0% (n = 86) were beyond the muscularis propria (ypT3-4); 28.5% (n = 49) had nodal metastasis, and 71.5% (n = 123) didn’t. Vascular invasion and perineural invasion were detected in 8.7% (n = 15) and 2.9% (n = 5) tumors, respectively. The response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy varied from grade 0-1 (n = 37, 21.5%), grade 2-3 (n = 118, 68.6%) and grade 4 (n = 17, 9.9%).

Table 2.

Associations and comparisons between VNN1 expression and clinicopathological factors in 172 rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant CCRT

Parameter No. VNN1 Expression P-value

Low Exp. High Exp.
Gender Male 108 55 53 0.752
Female 64 31 33
Age < 70 106 51 55 0.531
≥ 70 66 35 31
Pre-Tx tumor status (Pre-T) cT1-cT2 81 52 29 < 0.001*
cT3-cT4 91 34 57
Pre-Tx nodal status (Pre-N) cN0 125 69 56 0.026*
cN1-cN2 47 17 30
Post-Tx tumor status (Post-T) ypT1-ypT2 86 56 30 < 0.001*
ypT3-ypT4 86 30 56
Post-Tx nodal status (Post-N) ypN0 123 65 58 0.237
ypN1-ypN2 49 21 28
Vascular invasion Absent 157 82 75 0.059
Present 15 4 11
Perineurial invasion Absent 167 85 82 0.173
Present 5 1 4
Tumor regression grade Grade 0-1 37 12 25 0.001*
Grade 2~3 118 59 59
Grade 4 17 15 2
*

statistically significant.

Association between VNN1 immunoreactivity and clinical and pathological variables

After dividing the patient cohort into VNN1 over- and under-expression subgroups with cutoff point of median H-score, we used Pearson’s χ2 test to compare the relationship between VNN1 expression and variable clinicopathological factors. As demonstrated in Table 2, VNN1 high expression was significantly associated with more advanced pre-Tx tumor invasive depth (P < .001), positive pre-Tx nodal metastasis (P = .026), more advanced post-Tx tumor invasive depth (P < .001) and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (Figure 2, P = .001).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

VNN1 immunostain on representative sections revealed (A) low VNN1 immunoreactivity was related to (B) high tumor regression grade after preoperative chemoradiotherapy; (C) high VNN1 immunoreactivity was related to (D) low tumor regression grade. Note the normal colonic mucosa with no VNN1 immunoexpression (inlet).

Survival analyses for patients with rectal cancers

The survival analysis by univariate log-rank test was summarized in Table 3. More advanced post-Tx tumor status and lower tumor regression grade were significantly associated with shorter disease-specific survival (DSS), local (pelvic) recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and metastasis-free survival (MeFS) intervals (all P value ≤ .0090). Presence of vascular invasion was negatively associated with DSS and LRFS to statistical significance only (P = .0184 and .0028, respectively). Presence of pre-Tx nodal metastasis was significantly correlated with poorer LRFS only (P = .0070). Of above-mentioned prognostic indicators, only tumor regression grade was an independent prognostic factor for MeFS in multivariate analysis (Table 4, hazard ratio = 2.347, 95% confidence interval: 1.163-4.739, P = .017).

Table 3.

Univariate log-rank analysis for important clinicopathological variables and VNN1 expression

Parameter No. of case DSS LRFS MeFS

No. of event P-value No. of event P-value No. of event P-value
Gender Male 108 20 0.9026 7 0.2250 17 0.3520
Female 64 11 20 14
Age < 70 106 19 0.8540 18 0.6615 20 0.7427
≥ 70 66 12 9 11
Pre-Tx tumor status (Pre-T) cT1-cT2 81 10 0.0776 10 0.2261 11 0.1745
cT3-cT4 91 21 17 20
Pre-Tx nodal status (Pre-N) cN0 125 19 0.0711 15 0.0070* 19 0.0973
cN1-cN2 47 21 12 12
Post-Tx tumor status (Post-T) ypT0-ypT2 86 7 0.0006* 7 0.0040* 8 0.0033*
ypT3-ypT4 86 24 20 23
Post-Tx nodal status (Post-N) ypN0 123 21 0.5998 16 0.1320 20 0.4634
ypN1-ypN2 49 10 11 11
Vascular invasion Absent 157 25 0.0184* 21 0.0028* 27 0.4470
Present 15 6 6 4
Perineurial invasion Absent 167 29 0.2559 25 0.0940 30 0.9083
Present 5 2 2 1
Tumor regression grade Grade 0-1 37 13 0.0038* 10 0.0090* 14 0.0006*
Grade 2~3 118 17 17 16
Grade 4 17 1 0 1
Down stage after CCRT Non-Sig. 150 29 0.1651 24 0.5961 30 0.0853
Sig. (≥ 2) 22 2 3 1
VNN1 expression Low Exp. 86 6 0.0001* 5 0.0001* 9 0.0106*
High Exp. 86 25 22 22

DSS, disease-specific survival; LRFS, local recurrence-free survival; MeFS, metastasis-free survival;

*

statistically significant.

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis

Parameter DSS LRFS MeFS

H.R 95% CI P-value H.R 95% CI P-value H.R 95% CI P-value
Tumor regression grade 1.908 0.943-3.861 0.072 2.105 0.967-4.566 0.061 2.347 1.163-4.739 0.017*
VNN1 expression 3.063 1.211-7.745 0.018* 3.378 1.222-9.338 0.019* 1.761 0.791-3.925 0.166
Vascular invasion 2.082 0.828-5.239 0.119 2.069 0.771-5.555 0.149 - - -
Post-Tx tumor status (Post-T) 2.267 0.942-5.455 0.068 1.778 0.729-4.340 0.206 2.012 0.862-4.697 0.106
Pre-Tx nodal status (Pre-N) - - - 1.934 0.831-4.501 0.126 - - -

DSS, disease-specific survival; LRFS, local recurrence-free survival; MeFS, metastasis-free survival;

*

statistically significant.

Prognostic impact of VNN1 expression on patients with rectal cancers

In univariate analysis, VNN1 overexpression was significantly associated with worse DSS (P = .0001), LRFS (P = .0001) and MeFS (P = .0106) (Table 3 and Figure 3). In multivariate analysis, high expression of VNN1 protein still independently predicted adverse DSS (hazard ratio = 3.063, 95% confidence interval: 1.211-7.745, P = .018) and LRFS (hazard ratio = 3.378, 95% confidence interval: 1.222-9.338, P = .019) (Table 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed significant prognostic impact of VNN1 expression on disease-specific survival (DSS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and metastasis-free survival (MeFS) (all P value ≤ 0.0106).

Discussion

Introduction of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to patients with resectable rectal cancer not only improves survival rates, but also enhance the possibility of curative and/or sphincter-preserving surgeries due to down-staging of the tumor. The important randomized controlled studies revealed that neoadjuvant CCRT improved five-year disease-free survival rate compared with adjuvant CCRT (P < 0.05). Therefore, preoperative chemoradiotherapy have been gold standard treatment for patients with clinical stage II/III (cT3/4 or node-positive) rectal cancer [13]. However, colorectal cancer is still the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality, following lung cancer, liver cancer and gastric cancer [1].

VNN1 gene belongs to Vanin gene family (VNN1-3). All of them are located on chromosome 6q23-q24, and encode similar proteins with pantetheinase activity [7,14]. Pantetheinase (vanin-1), the encoded protein of VNN1 gene (A.K.A. vanin-1 gene), was first recognized as the molecule in murine thymic stromal cell line, which was involved in pre-T cell adhesion and thymus homing [15]. Pantetheinase is a glycosylphosphatidyl inositol (GPI)-anchored protein on cell membrane and weighs 70 kDa [15]. Pantetheinase participates in synthetic pathway of pantothenic acid (vitamin B5), by cleaving pantetheine to cysteamine and pantothenic acid. The latter is a water-soluble vitamin required for synthesis of coenzyme A (CoA). Recently, pantetheinase is also considered to play a role in the regulation of inflammation. In vanin-1-/- mice, glutathione-associated resistance to oxidative stress generated by whole-body gamma-irradiation or paraquat, as well as decrease of bowel inflammatory reaction induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and Schistosoma mansoni were observed [16,17]. Production of cysteamine during the metabolic pathway of pantetheine is supposed to be the main cause of pro-inflammatory reaction. Cysteamine directly inhibits γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase, the key enzyme in the glutathione synthetic pathway [18]. Glutathione is an important antioxidant for reducing oxidative stress in organisms. On the other hand, vanin-1-deficient mice lacking cysteamine had more γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase, resulting in storage of glutathione. Hence, vanin-1-/- mice prevent the tissue from oxidative stress and inflammatory reaction because of increased glutathione [16,17]. Sustained oxidative stress would induce chronic inflammation and many chronic diseases, including cancer [19,20]. Alterations of glutathione concentration and related enzymes were also investigated in colorectal cancer and other malignancies [21-23].

Using blood sample to determine the transcriptional levels of VNN1 and other genes as a biomarker panel, all the six genes were significantly up-regulated in patients with colorectal cancers. Among them, the fold change of VNN1 was from 1.53 to 1.87, compared with control samples (P < .0001) [8,9]. Vanin-1-/- mice with azoxymethane injection, a carcinogenic compound for the induction of colon cancers, also showed remarkably reduced incidence of colorectal cancer [24]. Furthermore, VNN1 and its upstream gene, SF-1 (NR5A1, encoding steroidogenic factor 1), were also investigated in tumorigenesis of adrenocortical neoplasia [25,26]. SF-1 transgenic mice generated adrenocortical nodular hyperplasia and tumor formation rapidly. Along with the tumor progression, spreading into surrounding tissue were also observed [25]. VNN1 transcripts were also strongly up-regulated in the adrenals of SF-1 transgenic mice in the same study [25]. VNN1 has been known as the target gene of SF-1 during the development of mouse testis [27]. Therefore, in the study of Latre de Late et al., SF-1 transgenic and VNN1-null (VNN1-/-) mice develop less neoplastic lesions in the adrenal cortex, compared to SF-1 transgenic mice (P = .0058). Additionally, treatment of cysteamine to SF-1 transgenic/VNN1-/- mice could overturn the effect (P = .0046) [26]. Consequently, the oncogenic properties of VNN1 may be due to the production of cysteamine during the synthetic pathway of pantothenic acid (vitamin B5) and CoA. Cysteamine directly represses γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of glutathione. Reduced glutathione causes uncontrolled oxidative stress and leads to an increase of reactive oxygen species in the cells, which may damage DNA and activate oncogenes [26].

Conclusively, overexpression of VNN1 (pantetheinase), an enzyme involved in vitamin B5-CoA synthesis and regulation of inflammation and oxidative stress, was not only significantly associated with more advanced pre-Tx and post-Tx disease, but also poor response to neoadjuvant CCRT in rectal cancers. Furthermore, high VNN1 immunoreactivity in tumor cells predicted poor prognosis of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. VNN1 overexpression was an independent negative prognosticator forecasting worse DSS and LRFS. Additional researches to elucidate the biological and molecular pathway are urgent for developing potential new therapeutic regimens targeting VNN1.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from E-DA Hospital (EDAHP105062 and EDAHS105003).

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tao K, Yang J, Guo Z, Hu Y, Sheng H, Gao H, Yu H. Prognostic value of miR-221-3p, miR-342-3p and miR-491-5p expression in colon cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2014;6:391–401. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rödel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1731–1740. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O’Connell MJ, Yothers G, Deutsch M, Allegra CJ, Kahlenberg MS, Baez-Diaz L, Ursiny CS, Petrelli NJ, Wolmark N. Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009;27:5124–5130. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pavlova NN, Thompson CB. The Emerging Hallmarks of Cancer Metabolism. Cell Metab. 2016;23:27–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nitto T, Onodera K. Linkage between coenzyme a metabolism and inflammation: roles of pantetheinase. J Pharmacol Sci. 2013;123:1–8. doi: 10.1254/jphs.13r01cp. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Marshall KW, Mohr S, Khettabi FE, Nossova N, Chao S, Bao W, Ma J, Li XJ, Liew CC. A blood-based biomarker panel for stratifying current risk for colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010;126:1177–1186. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yip KT, Das PK, Suria D, Lim CR, Ng GH, Liew CC. A case-controlled validation study of a blood-based seven-gene biomarker panel for colorectal cancer in Malaysia. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;29:128. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lin CY, Lin CY, Chang IW, Sheu MJ, Li CF, Lee SW, Lin LC, Lee YE, He HL. Low thrombospondin 2 expression is predictive of low tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2015;7:2423–2432. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th edition. Berlin: Springer; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A. Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12:19–23. doi: 10.1007/s003840050072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Benson AB 3rd, Venook AP, Bekaii-Saab T, Chan E, Chen YJ, Cooper HS, Engstrom PF, Enzinger PC, Fenton MJ, Fuchs CS, Grem JL, Grothey A, Hochster HS, Hunt S, Kamel A, Kirilcuk N, Leong LA, Lin E, Messersmith WA, Mulcahy MF, Murphy JD, Nurkin S, Rohren E, Ryan DP, Saltz L, Sharma S, Shibata D, Skibber JM, Sofocleous CT, Stoffel EM, Stotsky-Himelfarb E, Willett CG, Gregory KM, Freedman-Cass D. Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13:719–728. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Martin F, Malergue F, Pitari G, Philippe JM, Philips S, Chabret C, Granjeaud S, Mattei MG, Mungall AJ, Naquet P, Galland F. Vanin genes are clustered (human 6q22-24 and mouse 10A2B1) and encode isoforms of pantetheinase ectoenzymes. Immunogenetics. 2001;53:296–306. doi: 10.1007/s002510100327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Aurrand-Lions M, Galland F, Bazin H, Zakharyev VM, Imhof BA, Naquet P. Vanin-1, a novel GPI-linked perivascular molecule involved in thymus homing. Immunity. 1996;5:391–405. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80496-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Berruyer C, Martin FM, Castellano R, Macone A, Malergue F, Garrido-Urbani S, Millet V, Imbert J, Duprè S, Pitari G, Naquet P, Galland F. Vanin-1-/- mice exhibit a glutathione-mediated tissue resistance to oxidative stress. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:7214–7224. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.16.7214-7224.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Martin F, Penet MF, Malergue F, Lepidi H, Dessein A, Galland F, de Reggi M, Naquet P, Gharib B. Vanin-1-/- mice show decreased NSAID- and Schistosoma-induced intestinal inflammation associated with higher glutathione stores. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:591–597. doi: 10.1172/JCI19557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Griffith OW, Larsson A, Meister A. Inhibition of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase by cystamine: an approach to a therapy of 5-oxoprolinuria (pyroglutamic aciduria) Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1977;79:919–925. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(77)91198-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Weitzman SA, Gordon LI. Inflammation and cancer: role of phagocyte-generated oxidants in carcinogenesis. Blood. 1990;76:655–663. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen YI, Wei PC, Hsu JL, Su FY, Lee WH. NPGPx (GPx7): a novel oxidative stress sensor/transmitter with multiple roles in redox homeostasis. Am J Transl Res. 2016;8:1626–1640. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gamcsik MP, Kasibhatla MS, Teeter SD, Colvin OM. Glutathione levels in human tumors. Biomarkers. 2012;17:671–691. doi: 10.3109/1354750X.2012.715672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Qin XP, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Li NN, Chen B, Yang P, Wu XT. Glutathione S-transferase T1 gene polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk: an updated analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013;37:626–635. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2013.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chang IW, Lin VC, Hung CH, Wang HP, Lin YY, Wu WJ, Huang CN, Li CC, Li WM, Wu JY, Li CF. GPX2 underexpression indicates poor prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract and urinary bladder. World J Urol. 2015;33:1777–1789. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1522-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pouyet L, Roisin-Bouffay C, Clément A, Millet V, Garcia S, Chasson L, Issaly N, Rostan A, Hofman P, Naquet P, Galland F. Epithelial vanin-1 controls inflammation-driven carcinogenesis in the colitis-associated colon cancer model. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:96–104. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Doghman M, Karpova T, Rodrigues GA, Arhatte M, De Moura J, Cavalli LR, Virolle V, Barbry P, Zambetti GP, Figueiredo BC, Heckert LL, Lalli E. Increased steroidogenic factor-1 dosage triggers adrenocortical cell proliferation and cancer. Mol Endocrinol. 2007;21:2968–2987. doi: 10.1210/me.2007-0120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Latre de Late P, El Wakil A, Jarjat M, de Krijger RR, Heckert LL, Naquet P, Lalli E. Vanin-1 inactivation antagonizes the development of adrenocortical neoplasia in Sf-1 transgenic mice. Endocrinology. 2014;155:2349–2354. doi: 10.1210/en.2014-1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wilson MJ, Jeyasuria P, Parker KL, Koopman P. The transcription factors steroidogenic factor-1 and SOX9 regulate expression of Vanin-1 during mouse testis development. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:5917–5923. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412806200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Translational Research are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES