Abstract
Human brucellosis is a neglected and underrecognized infection of widespread geographic distribution. Brucellosis is present on all inhabited continents and endemic in many areas of the world, including Kuwait and the Middle East. Here, we present draft genome assemblies of five Brucella melitensis strains isolated from brucellosis patients in Kuwait.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Brucellosis is a highly infectious zoonotic disease caused by the organisms of genus Brucella (1). Among the 10 known species of Brucella (2), Brucella melitensis is the most pathogenic organism and a biological threat to humans (3). Genotyping of B. melitensis isolates is important for contact tracing and epidemiological surveillance in regions endemic for the organism (4). Whole-genome sequencing, by using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, is emerging as a rapid method for the genetic characterization of B. melitensis (5, 6). NGS-based assays are capable of identifying genetic variations in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and indels (5, 6). In order to identify genetic variations in strains from Kuwait, we did whole-genome sequencing of five B. melitensis strains isolated from patients residing in Kuwait. The sequence data were analyzed to determine the number of SNPs in the genomes.
Five clinical isolates of B. melitensis were grown on culture plates, and single colonies were suspended in saline. The bacterial suspensions were heated at 95°C for 10 min, and DNA was purified using the QIAamp DNA minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The genomic DNA was sequenced using Illumina MiSeq paired-end (2 × 150 bp) sequencing technology. The data quality was checked with FastQC (7). Reads were trimmed and quality filtered using FASTX-Toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/). The de novo assembly was performed using Velvet 1.2.10 (8). The best Velvet assembly was merged with SPAdes assembly by using SPAdes 3.8 (9). Quast was used to check the assembly quality (10). After ordering the obtained contigs against B. melitensis bv. 1 strain 16M using the Mauve contig aligner (11), each draft assembly was submitted to the NCBI for annotation with PGAP 3.3. SNPs were detected relative to the genome of reference strain B. melitensis bv. 1 strain 16M (GenBank assembly accession no. GCA_000007125.1) using BioNumerics 7.6 (Applied Maths, Belgium). All the assemblies have 57.2% G+C content and 3 rRNAs. Other assembly/genome characteristics, i.e., mean coverage, N50 contig length, number of contigs, assembly size, and number of genes, tRNAs, and SNPs are provided in Table 1. In-depth comparative analyses of these genomes are under way and will be published in an upcoming manuscript.
TABLE 1 .
Summary characteristics of whole-genome assemblies of five clinical B. melitensis strains isolated in Kuwait
| Strain | Mean coverage (×) | N50 contig length (bp) | No. of contigs | Assembly size (bp) |
No. of genes | No. of tRNAs | No. of SNPs | Accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KU/RCF-03 | 43.0 | 189,106 | 43 | 3,283,635 | 3,143 | 52 | 1,042 | LDTY00000000 |
| KU/RCF-31 | 40.0 | 176,881 | 49 | 3,289,202 | 3,151 | 51 | 1,493 | LDTX00000000 |
| KU/RCF-64 | 52.6 | 268,511 | 40 | 3,290,511 | 3,154 | 52 | 1,501 | LDTW00000000 |
| KU/RCF-84 | 69.0 | 293,285 | 34 | 3,289,577 | 3,150 | 52 | 1,505 | LDTV00000000 |
| KU/RCF-96 | 67.2 | 195,560 | 41 | 3,289,620 | 3,150 | 52 | 1,487 | LAQM00000000 |
Accession number(s).
All the genome sequences were submitted to NCBI under BioProject PRJNA278809 and are available with accession numbers listed in Table 1.
Funding Statement
The funder had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or decision to submit the work for publication.
Footnotes
Citation Khan MW, Habibi N, Shaheed F, Mustafa AS. 2016. Draft genome sequences of five clinical strains of Brucella melitensis isolated from patients residing in Kuwait. Genome Announc 4(6):e01144-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01144-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ko J, Splitter GA. 2003. Molecular host-pathogen interaction in brucellosis: current understanding and future approaches to vaccine development for mice and humans. Clin Microbiol Rev 16:65–78. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.1.65-78.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.O’Callaghan D, Whatmore AM. 2011. Brucella genomics as we enter the multi-genome era. Brief Funct Genomics 10:334–341. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elr026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Godfroid J, Cloeckaert A, Liautard J-P, Kohler S, Fretin D, Walravens K, Garin-Bastuji B, Letesson J-J. 2005. From the discovery of the Malta fever’s agent to the discovery of a marine mammal reservoir, brucellosis has continuously been a re-emerging zoonosis. Vet Res 36:313–326. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2005003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jiang H, Wang H, Xu L, Hu G, Ma J, Xiao P, Fan W, Di D, Tian G, Fan M, Mi J, Yu R, Song L, Zhao H, Piao D, Cui B. 2013. MLVA genotyping of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus isolates from different animal species and humans and identification of Brucella suis vaccine strain S2 from cattle in China. PLoS One 8:e76332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Azam S, Rao SB, Jakka P, NarasimhaRao V, Bhargavi B, Gupta VK, Radhakrishnan G. 2016. Genetic characterization and comparative genome analysis of Brucella melitensis isolates from India. Int J Genomics 2016:3034756. doi: 10.1155/2016/3034756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tan KK, Tan YC, Chang LY, Lee KW, Nore SS, Yee WY, Mat Isa MN, Jafar FL, Hoh CC, AbuBakar S. 2015. Full genome SNP-based phylogenetic analysis reveals the origin and global spread of Brucella melitensis. BMC Genomics 16:93. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1294-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.
- 8.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. 2004. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 14:1394–1403. doi: 10.1101/gr.2289704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
