Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2016 Oct 31;7:13328. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13328

Room-temperature Tamm-plasmon exciton-polaritons with a WSe2 monolayer

Nils Lundt 1,a, Sebastian Klembt 1, Evgeniia Cherotchenko 2, Simon Betzold 1, Oliver Iff 1, Anton V Nalitov 2, Martin Klaas 1, Christof P Dietrich 1, Alexey V Kavokin 2,3, Sven Höfling 1,4, Christian Schneider 1,b
PMCID: PMC5095560  PMID: 27796288

Abstract

Solid-state cavity quantum electrodynamics is a rapidly advancing field, which explores the frontiers of light–matter coupling. Metal-based approaches are of particular interest in this field, as they carry the potential to squeeze optical modes to spaces significantly below the diffraction limit. Transition metal dichalcogenides are ideally suited as the active material in cavity quantum electrodynamics, as they interact strongly with light at the ultimate monolayer limit. Here, we implement a Tamm-plasmon-polariton structure and study the coupling to a monolayer of WSe2, hosting highly stable excitons. Exciton-polariton formation at room temperature is manifested in the characteristic energy–momentum dispersion relation studied in photoluminescence, featuring an anti-crossing between the exciton and photon modes with a Rabi-splitting of 23.5 meV. Creating polaritonic quasiparticles in monolithic, compact architectures with atomic monolayers under ambient conditions is a crucial step towards the exploration of nonlinearities, macroscopic coherence and advanced spinor physics with novel, low-mass bosons.


Thanks to their strong light-matter interaction, atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides are ideal active materials for cavity quantum electrodynamics. Here, the authors embed a WSe2 monolayer within a Tamm-plasmon-polariton cavity, and observe exciton-polariton formation at room temperature.


With the first reports of atomic monolayer materials exfoliated from a graphite block, a genuine breakthrough in physics was triggered. However, from the point of view of opto-electronic applications, pristine graphene has its limitations, as it does not have a (direct) bandgap. Two-dimensional atomic crystals of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), compounds of a MX2 stoichiometry (M being a transition metal, X a chalcogenide), seem to be much more promising1,2,3,4,5,6, as monolayers of some TMDCs have a direct bandgap on the order of 1.6–2.1 eV2,7. Furthermore, the combination of large exciton-binding energies up to 550 meV2,8, large oscillator strength, the possible absence of structural disorder and intriguing spinor and polarization properties9,10,11,12 has recently placed sheets of TMDCs in the focus of solid-state cavity quantum electrodynamics and polaritonics. Polariton formation can be observed in the strong light–matter coupling regime, which becomes accessible in high quality, or ultra-compact photonic structures, such as dielectric microcavities or plasmonic architectures with embedded emitters comprising large oscillator strengths13,14. Once the light–matter coupling strength in such a system exceeds dissipation and dephasing, the hybridization of light and matter excitations leads to the formation of exciton-polaritons13. These composite quasi-particles have very appealing physical properties. Polaritons can travel over macroscopic distances at high speed (∼1% of the speed of light15) and, due to the inherited matter component, interactions between polaritons are notable. This puts them in the focus of nonlinear optics, collective bosonic phenomena and integrated photonics. Exciton-polaritons are bosons with a very low (and tailorable) effective mass and are therefore almost ideal candidates to study Bose–Einstein condensation phenomena at elevated temperatures. A serious drawback for this field, which circumvents a more efficient exploitation of polaritons, are the limited thermal stability of excitons in most of the III/V materials, strong disorder and defects in II–VI multilayer structures and exciton bleaching in organic polymers. TMDCs monolayers have the potential to overcome these drawbacks and are therefore considered as a highly promising material platform for light–matter interaction experiments1.

Recently, the physics of strong light–matter coupling between a single flake of MoS2 and a cavity resonance in a Fabry–Perot resonator structure was discussed16. However, the comparably broad photoluminescence (PL) emission of the monolayer used for these findings (60 meV16), which was grown by chemical vapour deposition, render the unambiguous identification of the full characteristic polariton dispersion relation, in particular in non-resonant PL experiments challenging. Unambiguous polariton formation with a single monolayer of MoSe2 was subsequently demonstrated at cryogenic temperatures17, enabled by its narrow linewidth (11 meV at 4 K and 35 meV at 300 K). Exfoliated WSe2 monolayers exhibit comparable linewidths and have a strongly enhanced luminescence yield under ambient conditions18, suggesting their suitability for room-temperature polaritonics. However, not even at cryogenic temperatures, strong coupling has been demonstrated in WSe2 monolayers, yet.

Here, to demonstrate strong coupling at ambient conditions, we have embedded a WSe2 monolayer in a compact Tamm-plasmon photonic microstructure19,20 composed of a dielectric distributed Bragg reflector (DBR), a polymer layer and a thin gold cap. We map out the characteristic energy–momentum dispersion relations of the upper and the lower polariton branch at ambient conditions by angle-resolved PL and reflection measurements. Our experimental findings are supported by modelling our device in a coupled oscillator framework, showing an excellent agreement between theory and experiment.

Results

Device fabrication

Figure 1a depicts a graphic illustration of our investigated device: it consists of a SiO2/TiO2 DBR (ten pairs), which supports a very high reflectivity of 99.97% in a wide spectral range between 580 and 780 nm. A single layer of WSe2, mechanically exfoliated via commercial adhesive tape (Tesa brand) from a bulk crystal was transferred onto the top SiO2 layer with a polymer stamp. The monolayer was identified by PL measurements, which also confirmed its excellent optical quality under ambient conditions (see Fig. 1b). Here we observe the characteristic profile from the A-valley exciton with a linewidth of 37.5 meV. The monolayer was capped by a 130 nm-thick layer of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and the device was completed by a 35 nm-thick gold layer (see Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Figs 1 and 2 for details on the influence of PMMA on the emission properties of the monolayer). The layer thicknesses were designed to support a Tamm-plasmon resonance at the energy of the room-temperature emission energy of the A-valley exciton (1.650 eV). Figure 1c shows the vertical optical mode profile obtained by a transfer matrix calculation, the corresponding refractive indices of the layer sequence and the resulting reflectivity spectrum (without embedded monolayer). The successful implementation of this device was confirmed by reflectivity measurements (see Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 3). This type of photonic microstructure features a strong field enhancement close to the metallic interface, which has proven to suffice for promoting polariton formation with embedded InGaAs-21, GaAs-22 and II/VI-23 based quantum well structures at cryogenic temperatures. We point out that the large refractive index difference in the dielectric Bragg reflector leads to Tamm resonances, which provide a very strong field confinement, yet quality factors on the order of 110 can be obtained, as can be seen from the simulated reflectivity spectrum in Fig. 1c.

Figure 1. Tamm-monolayer device.

Figure 1

(a) Schematic illustration of the Tamm-plasmon device with the embedded WSe2 monolayer. The monolayer is capped with PMMA, whose thickness primarily determines the frequency of the device's optical resonance. (b) PL spectrum of the WSe2 monolayer before capping, recorded under ambient conditions. The dominant emission is identified to stem from the A-valley exciton. Inset: false-colour optical microscopy image of the used WSe2 flake (monolayer in red shaded area; scale bar, 20 μm). (c) Calculation of the electromagnetic field intensity in the heterostructure and the optical resonance (inset). The Tamm-plasmon features a strongly enhanced field maximum close to the surface of the structure, which coincides with the vertical position of the monolayer in the device. The optical resonance features a quality factor on the order of 110.

Optical characterization

In the following, we will discuss the case of a device, which contains a single layer of WSe2 embedded in the resonant structure: we employ the characteristic energy–momentum dispersion relation of the vertically confined photon field in the Tamm device, to map out the coupling of the A-valley exciton of the WSe2 monolayer and the Tamm-plasmon-polariton. To cover a large emission angle, thus accessing a sizeable spectral tuning range, we use a high magnification (× 100) microscope objective with a numerical aperture of 0.7 in the PL experiment. As the polariton in-plane momentum k|| is proportional to sin(θ), with θ being the PL emission angle, this allows us to project a momentum range of up to 4.2 μm−1 onto the CCD (charge-coupled device) chip of our spectrometer in the far-field imaging configuration (see Methods section for further details). The sample is held at 300 K and the embedded monolayer is excited via a non-resonant continuous wave laser at a wavelength of 532 nm at an excitation power of 3 mW, measured in front of the microscope objective. In Fig. 2a, we plot the PL spectra extracted from our device at various in-plane momenta. At an in-plane momentum of 1.84 μm−1 (corresponding to an emission angle of 12.67°), we can observe a minimum peak distance between the two prominent features, which we identify as the lower and upper polariton branch. These two branches feature the characteristic anti-crossing behaviour with a Rabi splitting of 23.5 meV, the key signature of the strong coupling regime. We note that the strong coupling regime is primarily a result of the tight mode confinement provided by the Tamm structure24 (see Supplementary Note 3 and Supplementary Fig. 4 for details). Figure 2b depicts the fully mapped out energy–momentum dispersion relation of the two polariton resonances by plotting the corresponding peak energies as a function of the in-plane momentum. As expected from two coupled oscillators with strongly varying effective masses, we observe the characteristic potential minimum in the lower polariton branch with a modest negative detuning of Δ=ECEX=−11.7 meV. This negative detuning condition leads to an effective polariton mass of 1.45 × 10−5 me at the bottom of the lower polariton, where me is the free electron mass. We can furthermore observe the characteristic transition from a light particle close to k||=0 to a heavy, exciton-like particle at large k|| values. The corresponding Hopfield coefficients, which characterize the excitonic and photonic fraction of the lower polariton (|X|2 versus |C|2, respectively) are plotted as a function of the in-plane momentum in Fig. 2c. The potential minimum, which is formed in the lower polariton branch, is another key signature of an exciton polariton in the presence of vertically confined field. It furthermore provides a well-defined final energy state with a distinct effective mass, which is crucial for advanced parametric and stimulated scattering experiments25. A key advantage of exciton polaritons, as compared with other composite bosons (such as excitons), is the possibility to conveniently tune the depth of this attractive potential, and simultaneously the particles' effective masses and light-versus-matter composition by changing the detuning between the light and the matter oscillator. In addition, we carried out reflectivity measurements to provide further evidence that our device works in the strong coupling regime. The results are presented in Fig. 2d and were analysed and fitted the same way as for the PL data. Owing to experimental limitations (see Supplementary Note 4) we have realized a white light reflectivity measurement with a × 20 magnification objective with a numerical aperture of 0.40. Similarly, compared with the PL experiment, we observe a clear appearance of two normal modes that can be well described by a coupled oscillator model. For the sake of clarity, we have inverted the reflectivity spectra; thus, the reflection dips appear as positive signals in the graph. In Fig. 2e, we plot the extracted values of the reflection resonances as a function of the in-plane momentum, which allows us to reconstruct the polariton dispersion relation. The dispersion features the characteristic avoided crossing behaviour with a Rabi splitting of 14.7 meV. The somewhat reduced Rabi splitting measured in reflectivity is expected for a photonic structure with a modest quality factor and the slightly shifted resonance of the excitonic oscillator is most likely to be resulting from sample ageing, which is both detailed in the Supplementary Note 4.

Figure 2. Exciton-polariton formation with Tamm-plasmons.

Figure 2

(a) PL spectra recorded from the coupled device at room temperature at various in-plane momenta (depicted in a waterfall representation). Two pronounced resonances evolve in the system, which feature the characteristic anti-crossing behaviour of exciton-polaritons. (b) Energy–momentum dispersion relation of the lower and upper polariton branch at room temperature: the polariton energies are extracted by fitting spectra at various in-plane momenta (solid symbols). A coupled oscillator approach is employed to fit the data and to demonstrate excellent agreement between experiment and theory (lines). (c) Plot of the exciton and photon fraction of the lower polariton branch as a function of the in-plane momentum extracted from coupled oscillator fit. (d) Inverted reflectivity spectra at different in-plane momenta. (e) Energy–momentum dispersion relation extracted from the reflectivity spectra.

Modelling

To interpret our experimental data, we can fit the dispersions with a coupled oscillator model:

graphic file with name ncomms13328-m1.jpg

where Eph and Eex are photon and exciton energies, respectively, Δ is the detuning between the two modes, and Γph and Γex are photon and exciton mode broadening, respectively. The eigenvectors represent the weighting coefficients of exciton and photon fraction and ħΩ represents the Rabi splitting in the system. Solving the dispersion equation:

graphic file with name ncomms13328-m2.jpg

one can obtain two polariton branches. The result of this modelling is shown in Fig. 2b,e (solid lines) along with the experimental data (symbols). The fitting was carried out via solving the optimization problem with detuning, Rabi splitting and photon mass used as parameters. As the exciton mass is several orders of magnitude larger than the photon mass, it does not affect the result of the simulation and its value is taken to be 0.8 me, as defined in ref. 26. The dashed lines show photon and exciton energies as a function of the in plane wave vector k||. For details on the fitting procedure of momentum-resolved spectra see Supplementary Note 5 and Supplementary Figs 5 and 6.

We will now address the occupation of the polariton states in our device, operated under ambient conditions. The overall, momentum-resolved PL spectrum of the structure is plotted in Fig. 3a. In stark contrast to previous reports discussing polariton emission with TMDC materials at room temperature16, we observe a pronounced occupation of the low-energy states in the lower polartion branch and a reduced occupation of the excited polariton states. The following model was used to analyse the luminescence experiment: in a first approximation, owing to the comparably low particle numbers and high temperatures, we assume a Boltzmann distribution law for our particles: Ni∼exp(−Ei/kBT), where Ni and Ei denote i-state population and energy, and kB is the Boltzmann constant. The modelled PL is thus generated by a polariton gas at room temperature (T=300 K). We further assume that the emission stems from the photonic mode only and is broadened in energy according to a Lorentz distribution. This allows us to relate the PL intensity to the photonic Hopfield coefficients via:

Figure 3. Experimental and theoretical polariton dispersion relations in the studied Tamm structure.

Figure 3

(a) Room-temperature false colour intensity profile of the full polariton dispersion relation extracted from the PL measurements. (b) Model of the full dispersion by assuming a Boltzmann distribution of the quasiparticles with an effective temperature of 300 K.

graphic file with name ncomms13328-m3.jpg

where Γph is the broadening of the photonic mode and the i-index spans over the two polariton branches. We extract the value of Γph=15 meV from the experimental data. The experimental results and the theoretically calculated dispersion relation are plotted in Fig. 3a,b, respectively.

In fact, we achieve very good agreement between theory and experiment. Although our model is purely phenomenological and cannot account for any dynamic and microscopic effects in our system, it already serves as a first indicator that, despite the pronounced dissipation in our system, polariton relaxation is indeed significant. Additional simulations of our system with higher temperatures, which result in stronger luminescence from the upper polariton branch, can be found in Supplementary Note 6 and Supplementary Fig. 7 of the manuscript.

Discussion

In conclusion, we have observed clear evidence for the formation of exciton polaritons in a hybrid dielectric and polymer Tamm-plasmon-polariton device featuring an integrated single atomic layer of the TMDC WSe2. We mapped out the distinct polariton dispersion relation in angle-resolved PL and reflectivity measurements, and resolved both polariton branches including the characteristic parabolic energy minimum and the flattening towards the exciton band. Our experimental data are supported by a coupled harmonic oscillator model and we achieve very good agreement both for the energy evolution of the polariton resonances and for the population of polariton eigenstates. We believe that our work represents a significant step towards the implementation of polariton condensates and nonlinear experiments in the strong coupling regime based on single layers or stacks of several layers of TMDCs. Moreover, it will be of particular interest for TMDC polaritonic experiments to harness the unique spinor and valley physics inherited by the atomic monolayers. Combining plasmonics27,28 and two-dimensional active media in the strong light–matter coupling regime certainly carries great potential for building new architectures of highly integrated, nonlinear optical circuits and logic devices, which are operated at ultra-low powers and close to terahertz frequencies.

Methods

Sample design and fabrication

The sample was designed based on transfer matrix calculations, where the plasmon-polariton resonance was tuned to match the A exciton resonance of WSe2 monolayer at room temperature (1.650 eV). The bottom mirror consists of a commercially available DBR based on a fused silica substrate topped with ten pairs of TiO2/SiO2 layers (72/117 nm thickness, respectively, corresponding to a central stopband wavelength of 680 nm). The stopband ranges from 580 to 780 nm. The WSe2 monolayer was mechanically exfoliated onto a polymer gel film (polydimethylsiloxane) and was then transferred onto the bottom DBR. One hundred and thirty nanometres of PMMA were deposited by spin coating onto the structure. Finally, a 35 nm-thick gold layer was thermally evaporated onto the sample.

Experimental setup

We took advantage of an optical setup in which both spatially (near-field) and momentum-space (far-field)-resolved spectroscopy and imaging are accessible. PL is collected through a 0.7 numerical aperture microscope objective lens and directed into an imaging spectrometer with 1,200 groves mm−1 grating via a set of relay lenses, projecting the proper projection plane onto the monochromator's entrance slit. The system's angular resolution is ∼0.05 μm−1 (∼0.5°) and spectral resolution is ∼0.050 meV with a nitrogen-cooled Si-CCD as detector.

Analysis of the PL spectra

As the fine spectrometer grating (1,200 groves mm−1) does not cover the full spectral range of the PL signal, the angle-resolved PL spectra were taken at three different energies with ∼60% overlap and were subsequently combined. This procedure used a fast Fourier transform (FFT) smoothing algorithm to account for small-intensity offsets in the overlap regions. Finally, single spectra were fitted with a two-Gaussian fit, to deduce the peak energy.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Lundt, N. et al. Room-temperature Tamm-Plasmon exciton-polaritons with a WSe2 monolayer. Nat. Commun. 7, 13328 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13328 (2016).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-7, Supplementary Notes 1-6 and Supplementary References

ncomms13328-s1.pdf (888.7KB, pdf)
Peer Review File
ncomms13328-s2.pdf (776.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the State of Bavaria. We thank S. Tongay for providing initial samples for the project. We further thank S. Stoll and I. Kim for assistance in the exfoliation and pre-characterization of the high-quality monolayer material. Moreover, we thank A. Wolf for fabrication assistance and S. Brodbeck for assistance with the transfer matrix calculations. C.S. thanks L. Worschech for encouraging him at the very early stage of the work. A.K. and S.H. acknowledge the partial financial support from the EPSRC Hybrid Polaritonics Programme. C.S. acknowledges financial support by the European Research Council (unLiMIt-2D project).

Footnotes

Author contributions C.S and S.H. initiated the study and guided the work. N.L., C.P.D. and C.S. designed the Tamm device. N.L. and O.I. exfoliated, identified and transferred the monolayer. N.L. fabricated the Tamm structure. N.L., S.K. and M.K. performed experiments. N.L., S.K., S.B. and C.S. analysed and interpreted the experimental data, supported by all co-authors. E.C., A.V.N. and A.V.K. provided the theory. C.S., N.L., S.K. and E.C. wrote the manuscript, with input from all co-authors.

References

  1. Cao L. Two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenide materials: toward an age of atomic-scale photonics. MRS Bull. 40, 592–599 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  2. Chernikov A. et al. Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic Rydberg series in monolayer WS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 076802 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang Q. H., Kalantar-Zadeh K., Kis A., Coleman J. N. & Strano M. S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 699–712 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Xu M., Liang T., Shi M. & Chen H. Graphene-like two-dimensional materials. Chem. Rev. 113, 3766–3798 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Novoselov K. S. et al. Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10451–10453 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang Z. M. MoS2 - Materials, Physics and Devices Springer (2014). [Google Scholar]
  7. Tonndorf P. et al. Photoluminescence emission and raman response of MoS2, MoSe2, and WSe2 nanolayers. Opt. Express 21, 237–268 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ugeda M. M. et al. Giant bandgap renormalization and excitonic effects in a monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductor. Nat. Mater. 13, 1091–1095 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Xu X., Yao W., Xiao D. & Heinz T. F. Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 10, 343–350 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang G. et al. Polarization and time-resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy of excitons in MoSe2 monolayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 112101 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang G. et al. Double resonant Raman scattering and valley coherence generation in monolayer WSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 1–6 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Srivastava A. et al. Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe2. Nat. Phys. 11, 141–147 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  13. Weisbuch C., Nishioka M., Ishikawa A. & Arakawa Y. Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode splitting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3314–3317 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kavokin A. V., Baumberg J. J., Malpuech G. & Laussy F. P. Microcavities Oxford Univ. Press (2007). [Google Scholar]
  15. Amo A. et al. Collective fluid dynamics of a polariton condensate in a semiconductor microcavity. Nature 457, 291–295 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu X. et al. Strong light—matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals. Nat. Photonics 9, 30–34 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  17. Dufferwiel S. et al. Exciton-polaritons in van der Waals heterostructures embedded in tunable microcavities. Nat. Commun. 6, 8579 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang G. et al. Spin-orbit engineering in transition metal dichalcogenide alloy monolayers. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–9 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaliteevski M. A., Brand S., Chamberlain J. M., Abram R. A. & Nikolaev V. V. Effect of longitudinal excitations on surface plasmons. Solid State Commun. 144, 413–417 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  20. Sasin M. E. et al. Tamm plasmon polaritons: slow and spatially compact light. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 48–51 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  21. Symonds C., Lemàtre A., Homeyer E., Plenet J. C. & Bellessa J. Emission of Tamm plasmon/exciton polaritons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 2007–2010 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  22. Gessler J. et al. Electro optical tuning of Tamm-plasmon exciton-polaritons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 181107 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  23. Sebald K. et al. Tailoring the optical properties of wide-bandgap based microcavities via metal films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 062101 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  24. Lundt N. et al. Monolayered MoSe2: A candidate for room temperature polaritonics. Preprint at: arXiv:1603.05562 (2016).
  25. Savvidis P. G. et al. Angle-resonant stimulated polariton amplifier. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1547–1550 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vasilevskiy M. I., Santiago-Pérez D. G., Trallero-Giner C., Peres N. M. R. & Kavokin A. Exciton-polaritons in 2D dichalcogenide layers placed in a planar microcavity: tuneable interaction between two Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. B 92, 245435 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  27. Brongersma M. L. & Kik P. G. Surface Plasmon Nanophotonics Springer (2007). [Google Scholar]
  28. Barnes W. L., Dereux A. & Ebbesen T. W. Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 424, 824–830 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-7, Supplementary Notes 1-6 and Supplementary References

ncomms13328-s1.pdf (888.7KB, pdf)
Peer Review File
ncomms13328-s2.pdf (776.6KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES