Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2016 Oct 18;9:753–757. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.10.005

Data from three prospective longitudinal human cohorts of prenatal marijuana exposure and offspring outcomes from the fetal period through young adulthood

Gabrielle L McLemore a,, Kimberlei A Richardson b
PMCID: PMC5096595  PMID: 27833935

Abstract

This article includes data from three prospective longitudinal human cohorts of prenatal marijuana exposure (PME) and offspring outcomes from the fetal period through young adulthood. The table herein contains an overview of the major adverse effects associated with PME from the following human cohorts: (1) The Ottawa Prenatal Prospective Study (OPPS); (2) The Maternal Health Practices and Child Development Study (MHPCD); and (3) The Generation R Study (Gen R). In the OPPS, fetal gestational age was measured and age-appropriate standardized neuropsychological instruments were used to assess neonatal responses, and infant–child and adolescent–young adult cognitive and behavioral skills. In the MHPCD, birth length and weight, neonatal body length, and infant–child sleep, cognition, and behavioral parameters were measured. In the Gen R, birth weight and growth were measured, as were infant–child attention and aggression. The data in this article are in support of our report entitled “Prenatal Cannabis Exposure - The "First Hit" to the Endocannabinoid System” (K.A. Richardson, A.K. Hester, G.L. McLemore, 2016) [13].

Keywords: Prospective longitudinal human cohorts, Prenatal marijuana exposure (PME), Offspring outcomes, Fetal period, Young adulthood, Ottawa Prenatal Prospective Study (OPPS), Maternal Health Practices and Child Development Study (MHPCD), The Generation R Study (Gen R), Cognitive skills, Psychological skills, Behavioral skills


Specifications Table

Subject area Biology
More specific subject area Prenatal marijuana exposure and the first hit to the endogenous cannabinoid system[13]
Type of data Table
How data was acquired Prospective longitudinal human cohort data derived from the OPPS, MHPCD, and Gen R investigations with follow-up assessments of offspring from the fetal period through young adulthood
Data format Formatted
Experimental factors Prenatal marijuana exposure and offspring outcomes from the fetal period through young adulthood
Experimental features The OPPS assessed the effects of prenatal tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana exposure in low-risk, middle-class, Caucasian Canadian women. The MHPCD assessed the effects of prenatal alcohol and marijuana exposure in Caucasian and African American women of low socioeconomic status. The Gen R assessed the effects of prenatal marijuana exposure in a multi-ethnic cohort of women in Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Data source location N/A
Data accessibility Data is within this article.

Value of the data

  • This dataset is of value to the scientific community because it can serve as a reference for other researchers interested in the adverse effects of prenatal marijuana use on offspring outcomes from the fetal period through young adulthood.

  • These data are of value to the scientific community because they can open doors for new collaborative research efforts between physician-scientists (neonatologists), psychiatrists, drug addiction counselors, and/or basic drug abuse and addiction research scientists.

  • These data highlight the need for more extensive basic, clinical, and translational research on the impact of prenatal marijuana exposure on the development of cognitive and psychological processes in exposed offspring.

  • These data highlight the need for researchers to develop novel strategies for improving the health of and healthcare for pregnant women and their children.

1. Data

The data described herein are adapted from three articles [1], [10], [15]. This table highlights the cognitive, psychological, and behavioral effects of prenatal marijuana exposure with follow-up assessments of offspring outcomes from the fetal period through young adulthood (Table 1).

Table 1.

Three human prospective longitudinal cohorts of prenatal marijuana exposed offspring from the fetal period through young adulthood.

Study Fetus Neonate Infant–Child Adolescence–Young adult
  • Ottawa Prenatal Prospective Study (OPPS)

  • [6], [7], [8]

↓ Gestational age
  • ↓ Response to light

  • ↑ Startle response

  • ↑ Tremors

  • 3 years:

  • ↑ Motor skills

  • 4 years:

  • ↓ Memory

  • ↓ Verbal scores

  • 6 years:

  • ↓ Attention

  • ↑ Impulsivity

  • ↑ Hyperactivity

  • 9-12 years:

  • ↓ Visual perception

  • ↑ Impulsivity

  • 13-16 years:

  • ↓ Concentration

  • ↓ Visual memory

  • ↓ Verbal reasoning

  • 18-22 years:

  • ↓ Response inhibition

  • Response inhibition as measured via fMRI:

  • ↓ Cerebellum activity

  • ↑ Bilateral PFC activity

  • ↑ Premotor cortexactivity

  • Working memory as measured via fMRI:

  • ↓ Medial PFC activity

  • ↓ Dorsolateral PFC activity

  • ↓ Ventrolateral PFC activity

  • ↑ Left medial PFC activity

  • ↑ Inferior frontal gyrus activity

  • ↑ Left cerebellum activity

  • Maternal Health Practices and Child Development Study (MHPCD)

  • [2], [3]

  • ↓ Birth length (after 1st trimester exposure only)

  • ↑ Birth weight (after 3rd trimester exposure)

  • ↓ Body length

  • Subpopulation:

  • slight changes in EEG traces

  • 9 months:

  • ↓ Mental development

  • ↓ BSID scores

  • 3 years:

  • ↓ Short-term memory

  • ↓ Verbal reasoning (African Americans only)

  • 3 years:

  • ↓ Sleep efficiency

  • ↑ Nocturnal arousals

  • ↑ Wake-time after sleep onset

  • 6 years:

  • ↓ Concentration

  • ↓ Overall IQ score

  • ↓ Verbal reasoning

  • ↓ Quantitative reasoning

  • ↓ Short-term memory

  • ↑ Impulsivity

  • ↑ Hyperactivity

  • ↑ Delinquency

  • 10 years:

  • ↓ Abstract reasoning

  • ↓ Visual reasoning

  • ↓ Concentration

  • ↓ Internalization (Implosion)

  • ↓Learning and memory

  • ↓ IQ score

  • ↑ Externalization (Explosion)

  • ↑ Depression

  • ↑ Impulsivity

  • ↑ Hyperactivity

  • ↑ Delinquency

  • 14 years:

  • ↑ Delinquency

  • 16 years:

  • slight ↓ in fine motor coordination

  • slight ↑ in visual-motor coordination

Subsample of the Generation R Study, the Generation R Focus Study[5,9,11,12]
  • ↓ Birth weight

  • ↑ Growth (from 2nd trimester to parturition)

  • 18 months:

  • ↓ Attention

  • ↑ Aggression (for girls only)

Adapted from Calvigioni et al. [1], Huizink [10], and Wu et al. [15].

↑ - Increased; ↓ - Decreased; BSID - Bayley Scales of Infant Development; fMRI - Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Response inhibition - an indicator of executive control, refers to one’s ability to suppress inappropriate actions or impulses, which undergird goal-oriented and adaptable responses to dynamic surroundings [14].

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

The OPPS assessed the effects of prenatal tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana exposure in a low-risk, middle-class, mostly Caucasian, and predominantly Canadian cohort of women. The offspring of participants were followed until the age of 18–22 years [6], [7], [8].

The MHPCD assessed the effects of prenatal alcohol and marijuana exposure in a cohort of Caucasian (43%) and African American (57%) women of low socioeconomic status who were predominantly single (71%) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. Follow-up assessment data of offspring have been reported up to age 14 [2], [3].

The Gen R is an ongoing, population-based, large-scaled, multi-ethnic prospective cohort investigation of prenatal marijuana exposed offspring from the fetal period to early childhood in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. [4], [5], [9], [11], [12].

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2016.10.005.

Contributor Information

Gabrielle L. McLemore, Email: Gabrielle.McLemore@morgan.edu.

Kimberlei A. Richardson, Email: Kimberlei.Richardson@howard.edu.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (88.8KB, pdf)

.

References

  • 1.Calvigioni D., Hurd Y.L., Harkany T., Keimpema E. Neuronal substrates and functional consequences of prenatal cannabis exposure. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 2014;23(10):931–941. doi: 10.1007/s00787-014-0550-y. [Epub 2014 May 3. Review. PubMed PMID: 24793873; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4459494] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Day N.L., Richardson G.A. Prenatal marijuana use: epidemiology, methodologic issues, and infant outcome. Clin. Perinatol. 1991;18(1):77–91. [Review. PubMed PMID: 2040119] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Day N., Sambamoorthi U., Taylor P., Richardson G., Robles N., Jhon Y., Scher M., Stoffer D., Cornelius M., Jasperse D. Prenatal marijuana use and neonatal outcome. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 1991;13(3):329–334. doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(91)90079-c. [PubMed PMID: 1886543] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.El Marroun H., Hudziak J.J., Tiemeier H., Creemers H., Steegers E.A., Jaddoe V.W., Hofman A., Verhulst F.C., van den Brink W., Huizink A.C. Intrauterine cannabis exposure leads to more aggressive behavior and attention problems in 18-month-old girls. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;118(2-3):470–474. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.03.004. [Epub 2011 Apr 5. PubMed PMID: 21470799] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.El Marroun H., Tiemeier H., Steegers E.A., Jaddoe V.W., Hofman A., Verhulst F.C., vanden Brink W., Huizink A.C. Intrauterine cannabis exposure affects fetal growth trajectories: the generation R study. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 2009;48(12):1173–1181. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181bfa8ee. [PubMed PMID: 19858757] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fried P.A. Marihuana use by pregnant women: neurobehavioral effects in neonates. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1980;6(6):415–424. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(80)90023-x. [PubMed PMID: 7472153] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fried P.A., Watkinson B. 12- and 24-month neurobehavioural follow-up of children prenatally exposed to marihuana, cigarettes and alcohol. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 1988;10(4):305–313. doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(88)90032-3. [PubMed PMID: 3226373] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fried P.A., Watkinson B., Gray R. Differential effects on cognitive functioning in 9- to 12-year olds prenatally exposed to cigarettes and marihuana. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 1998;20(3):293–306. doi: 10.1016/s0892-0362(97)00091-3. [PubMed: 9638687] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hofman A., Jaddoe V.W., Mackenbach J.P., Moll H.A., Snijders R.F., Steegers E.A., Verhulst F.C., Witteman J.C., Büller H.A. Growth, development and health from early fetal life until young adulthood: the Generation R Study. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2004;18(1):61–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2003.00521.x. [PubMed PMID: 14738548] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huizink A.C. Prenatal cannabis exposure and infant outcomes: overview of studies. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2014;52:45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.09.014. [Epub 2013 Sep 27. Review. PubMed PMID: 24075896] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jaddoe V.W., van Duijn C.M., van der Heijden A.J., Mackenbach J.P., Moll H.A., Steegers E.A., Tiemeier H., Uitterlinden A.G., Verhulst F.C., Hofman A. The generation R study: design and cohort update 2010. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2010;25(11):823–841. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9516-7. [Epub 2010 Oct 22. PubMed PMID: 20967563; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2991548] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jaddoe V.W., van Duijn C.M., Franco O.H., van der Heijden A.J., van Iizendoorn M.H., de Jongste J.C., van der Lugt A., Mackenbach J.P., Moll H.A., Raat H., Rivadeneira F., Steegers E.A., Tiemeier H., Uitterlinden A.G., Verhulst F.C., Hofman A. The generation R study: design and cohort update 2012. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2012;27(9):739–756. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9735-1. [Epub 2012 Oct 20. PubMed PMID: 23086283] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Richardson K.A., Hester A.K., McLemore G.L. Prenatal cannabis exposure - The "First Hit" to the endocannabinoid system. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2016.08.003. [Epub ahead of print][Review. PubMed PMID: 27567698] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Verbruggen F., Logan G.D. Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008;12(11):418–424. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005. [Review. PubMed PMID: 18799345; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2709177] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wu C.S., Jew C.P., Lu H.C. Lasting impacts of prenatal cannabis exposure and the role of endogenous cannabinoids in the developing brain. Future Neurol. 2011;6(4):459–480. doi: 10.2217/fnl.11.27. [PubMed PMID: 22229018; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3252200] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (88.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES