Abstract
Platelets are anucleate cell fragments known for their central role in coagulation and vascular integrity. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that platelets contribute to diverse immunological processes extending beyond the traditional view of platelets as fragmentary mediators of hemostasis and thrombosis. There is recent evidence that platelets participate in: 1) intervention against microbial threats; 2) recruitment and promotion of innate effector cell functions; 3) modulating antigen presentation; and 4) enhancement of adaptive immune responses. In this way, platelets should be viewed as the underappreciated orchestrator of the immune system. This review will discuss recent and historical evidence regarding how platelets influence both innate and adaptive immune responses.
Keywords: platelets, innate immunity, adaptive immunity, hemostasis
INTRODUCTION
The classical role attributed to platelets has been in the prevention of bleeding and the initiation of wound healing. However, platelets are now recognized for their activities independent of thrombosis (reviewed in [1]). Platelets are the second most abundant blood cell only outnumbered by erythrocytes in the circulation (approximately 1.5–4.0 × 1011 platelets per liter of blood in healthy adult humans). In addition to their extremely high numbers, they are capable of storing and releasing bioactive mediators and express a wide range of functional immunoreceptors. Platelets store these bioactive molecules in three types of intracellular storage granules namely dense (δ−) granules, alpha (α−) granules, and lysosomal (λ−) granules that are released into the circulation or translocated to the surface upon platelet activation [1, 2]. The list of proteins housed in each type of granules is summarized in table 1. It is suggested that platelets package these various bioactive molecules discriminately into distinct granule subpopulations and undergo differential patterns of release in order to respond to different types of tissue damage or threats in a specific and selective manner [3–6]. These unique properties are suggested to position platelets to play an important role in effectively communicating with and modulating the function of other cells and to perform sentinel tasks in regulating immunity [6].
Table 1.
Platelet products, location and immune function.
Storage location | Molecule | Function |
---|---|---|
δ (dense) granule | ||
• Bioactive amines | Histamine | Proinflammatory modulator of endothelial cells, leukocytes and lymphocytes. |
Serotonin | Modulate proinflammatory responses and activation of monocytes and T cells. |
|
• Bioactive Ions | Ca2+, PO3− | Cell adhesion. |
• Nucleotides | ADP, ATP, GTP | Activation of purinergic receptors on immune cells. |
α granule | ||
• Adhesion molecules | Fibrinogen | |
VWF | Promote adhesion and interactions of leukocytes with platelets and endothelial cells. |
|
P-selectin | ||
GPIIb-IIIa | Promote platelet aggregation and interaction with endothelial cells and leukocytes. |
|
PMN recruitment. | ||
• Chemokines | CXCL-1 (GROα) | PMN recruitment, monocytes differentiation. |
CXCL-4 (PF4) | ||
CXCL-5 (ENA-78) | ||
CXCL-7 (NAP-2) | ||
CXCL-8 (IL-8) | ||
CCL-2 (MCP-1) | Recruitment and activation of various leukocytes and lymphocytes. |
|
CCL-3 (MIP-1- α) | ||
CCL-5 (RANTES) | Recruit and modulate the activity of various leukocytes, monocytes and lymphocytes. |
|
• Cytokines | IL-1β | Enhance antigen presentation by DC, B cell-class switching. |
sCD40 ligand | ||
Regulate growth, promotes wound healing. | ||
• Growth factors | PDGF | Immune modulator, immunosuppression. |
TGFβ | ||
Antimicrobial peptides. | ||
• Microbicidal proteins | Kinocidins | Antimicrobial peptides. |
Thrombocidins (1 and 2) |
Antimicrobial peptides. | |
Defensins (1 and 2) thymosin β4 |
Antimicrobial peptides. | |
λ (lysosome) granule | ||
• Proteases | ||
• Glycosidases | ||
Plasma membrane | ||
• Proinflamatory lipids | Thromboxane A2 | Procoagulant, promotes inflammation. |
PAF | Procoagulant, promotes inflammation. | |
• PRR | TLR1-7 | Detection of pathogens. |
TREM1 ligand | Detection of pathogens. | |
• Co-stimulatory | CD40 ligand * | Enhance antigen presentation by DC, B cell-class switching. |
CD40L can be found in both membrane-bound and soluble forms.
Although they contribute to diverse immunological processes, the immune functions of platelets have been underappreciated. The issue of platelet cellularity and the recognition of platelets as ‘immune cells’ have been controversial. However, platelet immune functions have become increasingly accepted now that their molecular make-up supports viewing these “cells” as unique and essential components of innate immunity [7]. Platelets engage the immune system by interacting with various immune cells [8, 9] and participating in both innate and adaptive immune responses [6]. In this review, we will discuss the recognized role for platelets in both innate and adaptive immunity.
Platelets in innate immunity
The capacity of platelets to participate in innate immunity is largely due to their ability to release a myriad of inflammatory and bioactive molecules stored within granules or synthesized upon activation. These mediators attract and modulate the effector cells of the innate immune system. In addition, platelets themselves demonstrate direct effector function and therefore are regarded as effector cells in innate immunity.
Platelets as effector cells in innate immunity
Platelets are among the first cells to detect endothelial injury and microbial pathogens as they gain access or invade the bloodstream or tissues [10, 11]. Injured endothelium exposes collagen and other membrane proteins which allow platelets to adhere. Stable adhesion to collagen leads to platelet aggregation and promotes the release of such platelet agonists as ADP, thrombin, and vWF, leading to activation and further platelet recruitment to the sites of tissue damage and infection [6]. This serves a two-fold purpose: 1) hemostasis where blood loss is greatest; and 2) frontline host defense against microbial infection. In addition, platelets express CC and CXC chemokine receptors such as CCR1, CCR3, CCR4 and CXCR4 [12] which detect signals for all four classes of chemokines (C, CC, CXC and CX3C) generated at sites of infection, resulting in rapid accumulation of platelets to the site of infection [2].
Platelets also express pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) [13, 14] which detect pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [13, 14]. The detection of PAMPs is an efficient host defense feature of platelets to ensure a rapid response to that particular threat. It was shown that human platelet TLRs can recognize and discern various isoforms of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) via TLRs and respond differentially to distinct PAMP by releasing different cytokine profiles and effector peptides [15, 16].
Antimicrobial host defense
Platelets interact with bacteria, viruses, fungi and protozoa and demonstrate anti-microbial functions [17, 18]. The mechanism of platelet-bacteria interactions are complex due to the diversity of platelet receptors involved in the recognition of bacteria. Platelets express a wide range of bacterial receptors, including complement receptors, FcγRIIa, TLRs, GPIIb-IIIa, and GPIb, and the interaction of platelets and bacteria is mediated through direct or indirect binding to these receptors [19]. Upon contact with certain bacteria, platelets can become activated, aggregate and degranulate. Activated platelets release over 300 known secretory products including anti-microbial products (collectively known as platelet microbicidal proteins (PMPs)) [20]. Four families of PMPs have been shown to be released from platelets which include kinocidins (CXCL4, CXCL7 and CCL5), defensins (human β defensin 2), thymosin β4, and derivatives of PMPs (thrombocidins and fibrinopeptide A or B) [2]. Recently, a study demonstrated the expression of β defensin 1 in human platelets and its novel antibacterial activity [21]. It was observed that activated platelets surround Staphylococcus aureus and force the pathogens into clusters which reduce growth rate. Platelet-derived β defensin 1 not only impaired the growth of S. aureus, but also triggered neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. Interestingly, platelets released β defensin 1 after being stimulated with S. aureus α-toxin, but not by agonists that induce granular secretion.
In addition to the anti-microbial mechanisms as discussed above, platelets can internalize bacteria and viruses. Specifically, platelets have been shown to engulf S. aureus and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) thus promoting pathogen clearance from blood stream and tissues [22]. In fact, platelets are capable of not only internalizing targets but also the killing of various internalized bacterial species including Escherichia coli and S. aureus [23, 24]. Whether this entitles platelets a potential phagocytic role needs further investigation. Furthermore, platelets generate and release hydrogen peroxide and other reactive oxygen species to mediate other anti-microbial effects in response to stimuli [25, 26].
Platelets have the ability to affect immune responses and kill pathogens; however, pathogens have also evolved mechanisms to evade platelet immune activities. For example, the gram-positive S. aureus is well known to manipulate multiple aspects of platelet activation. S. aureus expresses von Willebrand binding protein (vWbp) which binds von Willebrand factor (vWF) and can also activate prothrombin leading to fibrin production resulting in clot formation [27]. The bacteria can then use the formation of clots and exposure of vWF as an anchoring for colonization of tissue leading to complications such as infective endocarditis [28]. S. aureus can also utilize fibrinogen to crosslink platelets and cause their activation via the GPIIb-IIIa integrin making S. aureus/platelet/fibrin complexes leading to platelet activation [29–31].
Streptococcal species have also been widely studied in relation to platelet activation. Similarly to S. aureus, S. pyogenes M1 protein can bind fibrinogen leading to ligation and crosslinking of the GPIIb-IIIa integrin and subsequent platelet activation and aggregation. However, S. pyogenes does not create stable aggregates and it has been shown that the bacteria can then escape from the formed aggregate [32]. S. pneumoniae can activate platelets through TLR2 signaling [33], and other Streptococcal species can directly bind to the vWF receptor GP1ba [34]. Platelet interactions with bacteria are not limited to gram positive species. In a model of Klebsiella pneumoniae, platelet depletion led to accelerated mortality in mice; however, in the follow up article the authors revealed that this was not due to lack of platelet TLR4 signaling (through exclusion of MyD88 signaling) [35, 36].
In parallel to their interactions with and response to bacterial pathogens, platelets encounter protozoa, parasites, and viruses. Specific molecular and immune events are induced upon the encounter and in response to different classes of pathogens [37]. For example, after protozoal Leishmania infection in vertebrates, within one minute of blood contact, platelets adhere to Leishmania promastigotes which rapidly evolved into large Leishmania-platelet aggregates and this is believed as a key mechanism to enhance their phagocytosis and clearance from blood [38]. Off course, this is not a general response mechanism common to all protozoans. Human platelets kill Toxoplasma gondii via a mechanism that involves thromboxane A2 synthesis [39], another example of their defensive role in protozoal infections as well as their unique response to different pathogens.
Earlier observations demonstrated that human platelets inhibit the growth of the known malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, in vitro [40] whereas a later study reported that human platelets kill Plasmodium in infected human red blood cells and mediate survival to infection [41]. In either case, the results from both studies suggested a protective function for platelets only in the early stages of erythrocytic infection. Interestingly, this is distinct from their role in cerebral malaria (CM) as platelets are known to have an adverse role and significantly contribute to the pathogenesis of CM. There are several reports demonstrating different mechanistic roles for platelets in driving the pathology associated with CM [42–48]. These contradictory adverse versus protective effects of platelets in CM and in the early stages of malaria indicates the complexity of the implicated role of platelets in CM. However, a recent study attributed this complex role to the timing of platelet activation during infection [49]. The results show that platelets are activated very early in experimental CM (ECM) and induce the acute phase response to blood stage infection which in turn limits parasite growth early post infection and protect mice from ECM, whereas continued platelet activation as the disease progress contributes to ECM associated inflammation.
Platelets also contribute to antiviral immunity. They encounter and interact with viruses as demonstrated by experimental and clinical models of viral infections from HIV [50], influenza virus [51], dengue virus [52] and hepatitis C virus [53]. Platelets show a direct interaction with HIV-1 through different mechanisms such as binding, engulfment, and internalization, all of which play a role in host defense during HIV-1 infection, by limiting viral spread and probably by inactivating viral particles [50]. It was shown that supernatants from activated platelets suppressed HIV-1 infection of T cells and that the inhibitory activity was attributed to platelet-derived CXCL4 suggesting that the granule content might exert antiviral activity [54]. In a murine model of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection, platelets prevented lethal hemorrhage by promoting cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)-dependent clearance of the virus [55]. Animals depleted of platelets had reduced viral clearance and impaired virus-specific CTL response. The protective immune response of platelets to LCMV was also demonstrated by preventing splenic necrosis [56]. It is important to note that not all platelet-viral interactions are beneficial. Some interactions alter morphology and hemostatic properties of platelets leading to immune-pathological consequences such as thrombocytopenia as seen in dengue infection [57]. In the instance of dengue virus (DENV) infection in vitro, not only do platelets bind to DENV directly, they also release active virions indicating that they can actively spread the infection [58, 59]. This illustrates that the encounter of viruses by platelets are complex and that both host defense and injury can result. This complexity in platelet-pathogen interactions that result in pathogen clearance or host damage depend on the biologic context and platelet interactions with other host immune effector cells [37].
Platelets participate in tissue immunity
Although platelets are mostly located intravascularly, they can greatly affect leukocyte recruitment to areas of inflammation in many tissues, but we limit our discussion to lung, skin and kidney as examples with many overlapping mechanisms. Platelet-leukocyte interactions have been broadly studied in the lung, especially during both sterile and non-sterile inflammation [35, 60–62]. Importantly, studies overwhelmingly show that platelets seem to play an important role in regulation of lung injury due to granulocyte infiltration [63]. For example, in a murine model of ovalbumin (OVA)-stimulated lung inflammation, depletion of platelets using both the busulfan method and anti-platelet serum significantly decreased eosinophil and leukocyte recruitment to the lung tissue [62]. Furthermore, this effect was found to be due to lack of P-selectin on platelets and not on endothelial cells. Thrombocytopenia abrogated eosinophil recruitment and it was only restored when mice were transfused with platelets that were treated with thrombin and then fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde [62]. Not only is the surface receptor P-selectin involved in allergic inflammation, but the purinergic P2Y1 (not P2Y12) receptor has also recently been implicated in recruitment of leukocytes in allergic inflammation [64]. Using specific inhibitors to all purinergic receptors on the platelet surface, inhibition of leukocyte and granulocyte recruitment was only observed with P2Y1 antagonists, showing specificity and possible targets for intervention [64]. Importantly, during allergic inflammation in both rodents and patients, there is an increase in circulating platelet-leukocyte complexes which could lead to increased infiltration to the lung due to platelets binding the inflamed endothelium leading to leukocyte binding and extravasation [65, 66]. Not only do platelets affect granulocytes in allergic inflammation, they induce activation of dendritic cells during allergic inflammation and possibly contribute to antigen presentation by professional antigen presenting cells (APCs) [67].
In patients with atopic dermatitis, a type of allergic inflammation that leads to formation of red patches on the skin mediated by IgE, markers of platelet activation (PF4, soluble P-selectin) are significantly elevated in the blood [68, 69]. Once the skin lesions have cleared, platelet activity returns to normal levels [70]. Similarly, in patients with psoriasis, a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory condition of the skin, platelet aggregation in response to agonist is amplified and elevated plasma P-selectin levels have been reported [71, 72]. Using murine models of acute and chronic skin inflammation, it is clear that platelets play a role in recruitment of leukocytes leading to increased severity of these conditions, due to mechanisms involving P-selectin [60, 73, 74]. In atopic dermatitis platelet depletion showed a decrease in leukocyte recruitment to the dermis which lead to less severity of the disease [73, 74]. In models of contact dermatitis, a condition involving an inflammatory response to a chemical allergen directly on the skin, platelets are also responsible for regulation of hemorrhage and edema by causing leukocyte infiltration. In both of these allergic skin models of inflammation platelet P-selectin appears to be the most important factor. The findings are similar with cutaneous arthus reaction mediated by immune complexes, which also showed that platelet P-selectin plays a major role in leukocyte recruitment [74].
Acute kidney injury (AKI) can occur from multiple mechanisms ranging from ischemic injury to injury from infection. AKI has a high mortality rate, and is characterized by platelet-dependent neutrophil infiltration leading to damage to the organ [75]. Platelet P-selectin is again implicated in the recruitment of neutrophils to the inflamed kidney [75, 76]. Interestingly, it was also shown that neutrophils are required for platelet recruitment to inflamed glomeruli [77]. Activated platelets can release soluble CD40L and are responsible for approximately 95% of the sCD40L in circulation. CD40L is an essential cytokine that leads to activation of a broad spectrum of immune cells [78–82]. Importantly, the receptor for CD40L, CD40, exhibits increased expression in the injured or inflamed kidney [83, 84]. It has been shown that the interaction of sCD40L and CD40 in the kidney is an important factor in mediating both acute and chronic kidney injury [85].
Platelets manipulate leukocytes
Platelets are known to influence the innate immune response through regulation of both the maturation and activation of such innate immune cells as macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells [79, 86, 87]. First shown in vitro using co-culture studies, platelets can induce maturation of monocytes into macrophages [88]. Further studies have elaborated on specific platelet components that are responsible for differentiation of monocytes to macrophages. Although platelet cytokines such as RANTES and IL-1β have been shown to activate monocytes, the chemokine CXCL4 plays a major role in this differentiation process from monocyte to macrophage (reviewed in [89]). When platelets are activated or undergo apoptosis they release platelet microparticles (PMPs) which can affect macrophage differentiation and neutrophil activities [90, 91].
Neutrophils are the first line of defense during a bacterial infection. These cells are lethal to bacteria due to their ability to trap them using a neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) [92]. These NETs are composed of the nucleus of the neutrophil and other intracellular contents, which are then used to ensnare and kill bacteria [93]. NETosis (formation of NETs) is an essential mechanism of killing for neutrophils, and inhibition of NETosis leads to increased risk of developing opportunistic infections. Importantly, it has been shown that platelets play an essential role in the development of NETs. Platelet activation via TLR4 was shown not only to induce platelet binding to neutrophils, but subsequent induction of NETs [94]. Platelets release numerous factors when activated, and it has been found that an important factor in the induction of NET formation is hBD-1 [95]. It has also been shown that major cytokines released from platelets contribute to NET formation from neutrophils, which then can lead to their recruitment in a model of sterile inflammation. Further studies revealed that not only are components of platelet releasate important, but even engagement of integrins on the platelet surface can induce NET formation. Platelet α2bβ3 integrin interacts with neutrophil Mac-1 which has been shown to have different effects not just on diapedesis, but on NET formation [79].
Platelets have also been implicated in the maturation and activation of dendritic cells (DCs), indicating platelets can help bridge the innate and adaptive immune systems. Platelets have already been shown to recruit DCs through JAM-C/Mac-1 interaction leading to DC activation [96]. Platelets can also induce activation of naïve DCs through sCD40L after stimulation with thrombin [88]. Interestingly, another report described that platelets need not be in contact with immature DCs to activate them and that sCD40L from platelets was not causative of activation [34]. Dendritic cells are considered professional phagocytes and are critical in bridging the innate and adaptive immune systems. Maturation and activation of dendritic cells lead to presentation of antigen to T cells and induction of the adaptive immune response.
Platelets in adaptive immunity
The role of platelets in innate immune responses has been recognized for at least four decades. However, the role of platelets in adaptive immune response is emerging and has not been clearly elucidated [97]. Growing evidence suggests that platelets and their derived products influence adaptive immunity and play significant roles in shaping the immune response. For example, it was shown that platelets express functional CD154 (CD40L) [98], a molecule critical to the modulation of the adaptive immune response [99, 100].
The role of CD40L in adaptive immunity has been well documented. Ligation of T cell CD40L to CD40 on dendritic cells promotes DC activation and increases expression of co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules which collectively enhance antigen presentation [101]. Effective antigen presentation is central to the development of adaptive immunity to invading pathogens, and consequently the absence of CD40L affects both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. It was shown that primary and memory T cell responses are impaired in CD40L-deficient mice [102–104]. Additionally, the expression of CD40L on activated CD4 T cells provides the second signal necessary for T-cell-dependent B lymphocyte activation, subsequent isotype switching, and B cell differentiation and proliferation [105–107]. The established importance of CD40L for the adaptive immune response, combined with the abundance of platelets indicates that platelets are a great source of such critical molecules and highlights the role platelets can play in adaptive immunity.
Platelets enhance antigen presentation by APCs
Effective antigen presentation is central to the development of adaptive immunity to invading pathogens. DCs are the most powerful antigen presenting cells. The effect of platelets on dendritic cell activation/maturation state has been widely reported. Having discussed above the significance of CD40L and the potential role of platelet-derived CD40L in adaptive immunity, many reports have demonstrated in vitro that activated platelets induce DC maturation in a CD40L-dependent manner [108–111]. The activation and maturation of DCs were revealed by increased expression of co-stimulatory molecules B7.1 and B7.2 along with other cell surface markers, such as ICAM-1 and enhancement of IL-6 and IL-12 production. In contrast, a different study attributed the induction of DC maturation to soluble protein factors expressed by activated platelets other than through CD40L [112]. The discrepancy of these results might be due to different experimental set up such as the ratio of platelets to DC and the agonist used to activate platelets. However, it may also indicate the involvement of other mediators expressed or secreted by platelets. Nonetheless, the role of platelets in DC activation whether by surface contact or by secreted soluble mediators promotes and enhances antigen presentation by DC.
Platelets are also capable of delivering antigens to antigen presenting cells. A recent study showed that platelets shuttle blood-borne bacteria to CD8α+ DC [113]. In this study, Listeria monocytogenes associated with platelets in the bloodstream in a manner dependent on GPIb and complement C3, which target the bacterium to splenic CD8α+ DC. This association with platelets was not a unique feature of L. monocytogenes, but rather a common feature among gram-positive bacteria. The study concluded that this active shuttling mechanism for systemic bacteria by platelets diverts bacteria from complete clearance by other phagocytes and thus effectively serves as a balance between maintaining sterility of the circulation and induction of the antibacterial adaptive immune responses.
In addition to their role in antigen presentation, enhancement of the immune response by capturing and delivering blood-borne pathogens to splenic DC, by direct interaction via CD40L, and activation of DC, platelets themselves can process and present antigens. A recent study has shown that platelets present antigen in the context of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) [114]. This is an interesting finding as platelets possess the molecular machinery needed for antigen processing and presentation. For example, platelets express MHC I molecules necessary for antigen presentation and have an active proteasome, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, and associated proteins such as calnexin, calreticulin, TAP1 and ERp57, involved in processing, production and assembly of MHC I and the antigenic peptide to be presented [114–119]. Although platelets do not express MHC class II molecules under normal conditions, it is important to note that platelets have been reported to express MHC II in some disease states [120, 121]. Furthermore, platelets, like other antigen presenting cells, express T cell co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules including B7.2, ICOSL, CD40, CD44, ICAM-2, and DC-SIGN [114, 122–125] that are critical for optimal antigen presentation and T cell activation [106,114–117].
Role of platelets in adaptive T cell response
Platelets not only play a role in antigen presentation, but also influence T cell responses. The ability of platelets to participate in T cell immunity was investigated upon the discovery that activated platelets express functional CD40L as discussed above. An early study showed that platelets via CD40L augmented CD8 T cell responses and enhanced protective secondary immune responses against viral infection [108]. Similarly, platelets promote cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity [55] and seem to interact with CD8 T cells to facilitate the targeting of virally infected host cells required for viral reservoir clearance [126]. In the absence of platelets during viral hepatitis, liver inflammation is reduced but viral titers are increased due to lack of CD8 cells. In the presence of platelets, liver inflammation is increased due to CD8 cell infiltration but viral titers are reduced. In this acute viral hepatitis mouse model, transfusion of normal platelets into platelet-depleted mice restored CTL accumulation and targeting of virally infected hepatic cells.
Likewise, platelets enable T cell priming and protection against bacterial pathogens [127, 128]. The mechanism how platelet-derived CD40L coordinates the T cell response is unknown. It is thought that this is due to the maturation signal delivered to DC by platelet CD40L which leads to better antigen presentation and thus better T cell activation. However, it could also be through direct antigen presentation and direct interaction with T cells as was demonstrated recently in an experimental cerebral malaria mouse model [114].
In addition to platelet-derived CD40L-dependent modulation of T cell responses, platelets can also coordinate T cell immunity via cytokine secretion. One report has shown that platelets regulate the differentiation of CD4 T cells indirectly though secretion of chemokines and through direct cell-cell contact. In this study, platelets promote polarization of Th1, Th17, and Treg, but not Th2, and enhance the production of cytokine profiles needed for the polarization of these subtypes of CD4 T cells [129]. The mechanism by which platelets regulate the dynamic of CD4 T cell responses was further investigated. The study concluded that: I) platelets constantly promote Treg cell responses but exert a biphasic regulation of Th1/Th17 activation, namely a transient enhancement followed by a secondary suppression phase, II) platelets are the primary actor in the secondary suppressive phase rather than Treg cells, and III) the distinct regulations are achieved by selective inhibition of FoxP3(−) T-cell proliferation by platelet-derived cytokine TGF β [130]. These results might be inconsistent with the idea that platelet-derived RANTES [131] enhances, while platelet-derived TGF β [132] inhibits, Th1 differentiation and function. It also agrees with previous findings in which platelets seem to modulate the balance between regulatory and non-regulatory T cells by which PF4, a platelet-specific chemokine, attenuates Th1 [133] but enhances Treg cell responses [134]. Collectively, the data presented indicates that platelets regulate CD4 T cell responses in a complex manner. This differential regulation of CD4 T cell subsets suggest that platelets, in response to inflammatory stimuli, promote CD4 T cells for robust pro and anti-inflammatory responses.
Role of platelets in adaptive B cell response
Platelets also modulate B cell adaptive responses to microbial pathogens. As discussed above, it is well established that CD40L on activated CD4 T cells trigger B cell CD40 providing the second signal necessary for T-cell-dependent B lymphocyte activation, subsequent isotype switching, and B cell differentiation and proliferation [105–107]. This role of platelets in mobilizing B cell humoral immune responses was clearly observed through the use of the murine CD40L−/− mouse model. In this model, transfusion of activated wild-type platelets, but not CD40L−/− platelets, was sufficient to induce B cell isotype switching [108]. This study also demonstrated that depletion of platelets in wild-type mice compromised their ability to mount an efficient IgG response. A subsequent report also demonstrated that adaptively transferred wild-type CD4 T cells alone into CD40L−/− mice failed to generate efficient B cell germinal center and antibody responses to adenovirus, but were able to significantly increase germinal center formation and IgG production upon transfusion along with wild-type platelets [135]. These results were observed under limiting conditions of CD4 T cells or antigen dose which resemble the physiological setting at the time of an initial antigen encounter. However, platelets did not add to the mounted response to high dose adenovirus or upon the transfusion of high number of CD4 T cells. Collectively, these results may suggest that platelets augment T cell-dependent B cell responses through linking T cell and B cell interaction via CD40-CD40L.
SUMMARY
Although platelets were discovered by Bizzozero over 100 years ago, they continue to display activities which should no longer be surprising. For example, platelets have recently been shown to chemotax in response to specific stimuli [136–138] and produce microparticles capable of initiating both thrombosis and inflammation (reviewed in [139]). The vast role of platelets is a world still open to exploration and will provide a continuous source of amazement into the capabilities of these anucleate cells.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH/NHLBI RO1 HL 122401 (to R.G.W.).
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
REFERENCES
- 1.Smyth SS, McEver RP, Weyrich AS, Morrell CN, Hoffman MR, Arepally GM, French PA, Dauerman HL, Becker RC. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2009;7:1759. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03586.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yeaman MR. Nat. Rev. Micro. 2014;12:426. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sehgal S, Storrie B. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2007;5:2009. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.White GC, Rompietti R. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2007;5:2006. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02731.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Italiano JE, Richardson JL, Patel-Hett S, Battinelli E, Zaslavsky A, Short S, Ryeom S, Folkman J, Klement GL. Blood. 2008;111:1227. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-09-113837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Semple JW, Italiano JE, Freedman J. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011;11:264. doi: 10.1038/nri2956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Garraud O, Cognasse F. Front. Immunol. 2015;6:70. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ghasemzadeh M, Hosseini E. Thromb. Res. 2013;131:191. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li N. J. Leuk. Biol. 2008;83:1069. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0907615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Al Dieri R, de Laat B, Hemker HC. Blood Reviews. 2012;26:197. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2012.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gardiner EE, Andrews RK. J. Infec. Dis. 2013;208:871. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Clemetson KJ, Clemetson JM, Proudfoot AEI, Power CA, Baggiolini M, Wells TNC. Blood. 2000;96:4046. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cognasse F, Hamzeh H, Chavarin P, Acquart S, Genin C, Garraud O. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2005;83:196. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1711.2005.01314.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Aslam R, Speck ER, Kim M, Crow AR, Bang KW, Nestel FP, Ni H, Lazarus AH, Freedman J, Semple JW. Blood. 2006;107:637. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cognasse F, Hamzeh-Cognasse H, Lafarge S, Delezay O, Pozzetto B, McNicol A, Garraud O. Br. J. Haematol. 2008;141:84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.06999.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Berthet J, Damien P, Hamzeh-Cognasse H, Arthaud C-A, Eyraud M-A, Zéni F, Pozzetto B, McNicol A, Garraud O, Cognasse F. Clin. Immunol. 2012;145:189. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2012.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Klinger MHF. Anat. Embryol. 1997;196:1. doi: 10.1007/s004290050075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yeaman MR. Clin. Inf. Dis. 1997;25:951. doi: 10.1086/516120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hamzeh-Cognasse H, Damien P, Chabert A, Pozzetto B, Cognasse F, Garraud O. Front. Immunol. 2015;6:82. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Coppinger JA, Cagney G, Toomey S, Kislinger T, Belton O, McRedmond JP, Cahill DJ, Emili A, Fitzgerald DJ, Maguire PB. Blood. 2003;103:2096. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-08-2804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kraemer BF, Campbell RA, Schwertz H, Cody MJ, Franks Z, Tolley ND, Kahr WHA, Lindemann S, Seizer P, Yost CC, Zimmerman GA, Weyrich AS. PLoS Pathogens. 2011;7:e1002355. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Youssefian T, Drouin A, Massé J-M, Guichard J, Cramer EM. Blood. 2002;99:4021. doi: 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Antczak AJ, Vieth JA, Singh N, Worth RG. Clin. Vac. Immunol. 2011;18:210. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00296-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Riaz AH, Tasma BE, Woodman ME, Wooten RM, Worth RG. Fems Immunol. Med. Micro. 2012;65:78. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00945.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chakrabarti S, Varghese S, Vitseva O, Tanriverdi K, Freedman JE. Arterio. Thromb. and Vasc. Biol. 2005;25:2428. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000184765.59207.f3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zander DMW, Klinger M. Biotech. J. 2009;4:914. doi: 10.1002/biot.200800362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Claes J, Vanassche T, Peetermans M, Liesenborghs L, Vandenbriele C, Vanhoorelbeke K, Missiakas D, Schneewind O, Hoylaerts MF, Heying R, Verhamme P. Blood. 2014;124:1669. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-02-558890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Flick MJ, Du X, Prasad JM, Raghu H, Palumbo JS, Smeds E, Hook M, Degen JL. Blood. 2013;121:1783. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-453894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Arman M, Krauel K, Tilley DO, Weber C, Cox D, Greinacher A, Kerrigan SW, Watson SP. Blood. 2014;123:3166. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-540526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nguyen T, Ghebrehiwet B, Peerschke EI. Inf. Immun. 2000;68:2061. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.4.2061-2068.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vanassche T, Kauskot A, Verhaegen J, Peetermans WE, van Ryn J, Schneewind O, Hoylaerts MF, Verhamme P. Thromb. Haemost. 2012;107:1107. doi: 10.1160/TH11-12-0891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Svensson L, Baumgarten M, Morgelin M, Shannon O. Inf. Immun. 2014;82:4307. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02020-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Keane C, Tilley D, Cunningham A, Smolenski A, Kadioglu A, Cox D, Jenkinson HF, Kerrigan SW. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2010;8:2757. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hamzeh-Cognasse H, Cognasse F, Palle S, Chavarin P, Olivier T, Delezay O, Pozzetto B, Garraud O. BMC Immunol. 2008;9:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-9-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.de Stoppelaar SF, van 't Veer C, Claushuis TA, Albersen BJ, Roelofs JJ, van der Poll T. Blood. 2014;124:3781. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-573915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.de Stoppelaar SF, Claushuis TA, Jansen MP, Hou B, Roelofs JJ, van 't Veer C, van der Poll T. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2015;13:1709. doi: 10.1111/jth.13048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vieira-de-Abreu A, Campbell RA, Weyrich AS, Zimmerman GA. Sem. Immunopath. 2012;34:5. doi: 10.1007/s00281-011-0286-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Domínguez M, Toraño A. Parasite Immunol. 2001;23:259. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3024.2001.00380.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yong EC, Chi EY, Fritsche TR, Henderson WR. J. Exp. Med. 1991;173:65. doi: 10.1084/jem.173.1.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Peyron F, Polack B, Lamotte D, Kolodie L, Ambroise-Thomas P. Parasitology. 1989;99:317. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000059011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McMorran BJ, Marshall VM, de Graaf C, Drysdale KE, Shabbar M, Smyth GK, Corbin JE, Alexander WS, Foote SJ. Science. 2009;323:797. doi: 10.1126/science.1166296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pain A, Ferguson DJP, Kai O, Urban BC, Lowe B, Marsh K, Roberts DJ. PNAS. 2001;98:1805. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Grau GE, Mackenzie CD, Carr RA, Redard M, Pizzolato G, Allasia C, Cataldo C, Taylor TE, Molyneux ME. J. Infec. Dis. 2003;187:461. doi: 10.1086/367960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.van der Heyde HC, Gramaglia I, Sun G, Woods C. Blood. 2005;105:1956. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wassmer SC, Combes V, Candal FJ, Juhan-Vague I, Grau GE. Inf. Immun. 2006;74:645. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.1.645-653.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.van der Heyde HC, Nolan J, Combes V, Gramaglia I, Grau GE. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22:503. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Srivastava K, Cockburn IA, Swaim A, Thompson LE, Tripathi A, Fletcher CA, Shirk EM, Sun H, Kowalska MA, Fox-Talbot K, Sullivan D, Zavala F, Morrell CN. Cell Host & Microbe. 2008;4:179. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cox D, McConkey S. Cell and Mol. Life Sci. 2010;67:557. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0211-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Aggrey AA, Srivastava K, Field DJ, Morrell CN. J. Immunol. 2013;190:4685. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Torre D, Pugliese A. Current HIV Research. 2008;6:411. doi: 10.2174/157016208785861140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Terada H, Baldini M, Ebbe S, Madoff MA. Blood. 1966;28:213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ghosh K, Gangodkar S, Jain P, Shetty S, Ramjee S, Poddar P, Basu A. J. Elec. Micro. 2008;57:113. doi: 10.1093/jmicro/dfn007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zahn A, Jennings N, Ouwehand WH, Allain J-P. J. Gen. Vir. 2006;87:2243. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81826-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Solomon Tsegaye T, Gnirß K, Rahe-Meyer N, Kiene M, Krämer-Kühl A, Behrens G, Münch J, Pöhlmann S. Retrovirology. 2013;10:48. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-10-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Iannacone M, Sitia G, Isogawa M, Whitmire JK, Marchese P, Chisari FV, Ruggeri ZM, Guidotti LG. PNAS. 2008;105:629. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711200105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Loria GD, Romagnoli PA, Moseley NB, Rucavado A, Altman JD. Blood. 2013;121:940. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-376822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hottz E, Tolley ND, Zimmerman GA, Weyrich AS, Bozza FA. Drug Discovery Today: Disease Mechanisms. 2011;8:e33. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rondina MT, Weyrich AS. Blood. 2015;126:286–287. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-647362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Simon AY, Sutherland MR, Pryzdial EL. Blood. 2015;126:378. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-09-598029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Duerschmied D, Suidan GL, Demers M, Herr N, Carbo C, Brill A, Cifuni SM, Mauler M, Cicko S, Bader M, Idzko M, Bode C, Wagner DD. Blood. 2013;121:1008. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-06-437392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rossaint J, Herter JM, Van Aken H, Napirei M, Doring Y, Weber C, Soehnlein O, Zarbock A. Blood. 2014;123:2573. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-07-516484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pitchford SC, Momi S, Giannini S, Casali L, Spina D, Page CP, Gresele P. Blood. 2005;105:2074. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lellouch-Tubiana A, Lefort J, Pirotzky E, Vargaftig BB, Pfister A. Br. J. Exp. Path. 1985;66:345. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Amison RT, Momi S, Morris A, Manni G, Keir S, Gresele P, Page CP, Pitchford SC. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015;135:528. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mine S, Fujisaki T, Suematsu M, Tanaka Y. Internal Medicine. 2001;40:1085. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.40.1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Page C, Pitchford S. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2014;44:901. doi: 10.1111/cea.12322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Durk T, Duerschmied D, Muller T, Grimm M, Reuter S, Vieira RP, Ayata K, Cicko S, Sorichter S, Walther DJ, Virchow JC, Taube C, Idzko M. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013;187:476. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1440OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kasperska-Zajac A, Nowakowski M, Rogala B. Inflammation. 2004;28:299. doi: 10.1007/s10753-004-6054-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tamagawa-Mineoka R, Katoh N, Ueda E, Masuda K, Kishimoto S. Clin. Immunol. 2009;131:495. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2009.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kasperska-Zajac A. Platelets. 2010;21:522. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2010.493247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Garbaraviciene J, Diehl S, Varwig D, Bylaite M, Ackermann H, Ludwig RJ, Boehncke WH. Exp. Dermatol. 2010;19:736. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2010.01095.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Berrettini M, Parise P, Constantini V, Grasselli S, Nenci GG. Thromb. Haemost. 1985;53:195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tamagawa-Mineoka R, Katoh N, Ueda E, Takenaka H, Kita M, Kishimoto S. Am. J. Pathol. 2007;170:2019. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hara T, Shimizu K, Ogawa F, Yanaba K, Iwata Y, Muroi E, Takenaka M, Komura K, Hasegawa M, Fujimoto M, Sato S. Am. J. Pathol. 2010;176:259. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.081117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Singbartl K, Forlow SB, Ley K. FASEB J. 2001;15:2337. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0199com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kuligowski MP, Kitching AR, Hickey MJ. J. Immunol. 2006;176:6991. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.11.6991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Devi S, Kuligowski MP, Kwan RY, Westein E, Jackson SP, Kitching AR, Hickey MJ. Am. J. Pathol. 2010;177:1131. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Cognasse F, Hamzeh-Cognasse H, Lafarge S, Chavarin P, Cogne M, Richard Y, Garraud O. Exp. Hematol. 2007;35:1376. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2007.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Jin R, Yu S, Song Z, Zhu X, Wang C, Yan J, Wu F, Nanda A, Granger DN, Li G. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Li G, Sanders JM, Bevard MH, Sun Z, Chumley JW, Galkina EV, Ley K, Sarembock IJ. Am. J. Pathol. 2008;172:1141. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Martinson J, Bae J, Klingemann HG, Tam Y. Cytotherapy. 2004;6:487. doi: 10.1080/14653240410005249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Setianto BY, Hartopo AB, Gharini PP, Anggrahini DW, Irawan B. Heart and Vessels. 2010;25:282. doi: 10.1007/s00380-009-1199-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Laxmanan S, Datta D, Geehan C, Briscoe DM, Pal S. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005;16:2714. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005010045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.van Kooten C, van der Linde X, Woltman AM, van Es LA, Daha MR. Kidney International. 1999;56:41. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Haller ST, Kalra PA, Ritchie JP, Chrysochou T, Brewster P, He W, Yu H, Shapiro JI, Cooper CJ. Hypertension. 2013;61:894. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gudbrandsdottir S, Hasselbalch HC, Nielsen CH. J. Immunol. 2013;191:4059. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ruf A, Schlenk RF, Maras A, Morgenstern E, Patscheke H. Blood. 1992;80:1238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Kaneider NC, Kaser A, Tilg H, Ricevuti G, Wiedermann CJ. Int. J. Immunopath. and Pharmacol. 2003;16:225. doi: 10.1177/039463200301600307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Gear AR, Camerini D. Microcirculation. 2003;10:335. doi: 10.1038/sj.mn.7800198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Lo SC, Hung CY, Lin DT, Peng HC, Huang TF. J. Biomed. Sci. 2006;13:787. doi: 10.1007/s11373-006-9107-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Vasina EM, Cauwenberghs S, Feijge MA, Heemskerk JW, Weber C, Koenen RR. Cell Death & Disease. 2011;2:e211. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2011.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.McDonald B, Urrutia R, Yipp BG, Jenne CN, Kubes P. Cell Host & Microbe. 2012;12:324. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, Weinrauch Y, Zychlinsky A. Science. 2004;303:1532. doi: 10.1126/science.1092385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Clark SR, Ma AC, Tavener SA, McDonald B, Goodarzi Z, Kelly MM, Patel KD, Chakrabarti S, McAvoy E, Sinclair GD, Keys EM, Allen-Vercoe E, Devinney R, Doig CJ, Green FH, Kubes P. Nat. Med. 2007;13:463. doi: 10.1038/nm1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kraemer BF, Campbell RA, Schwertz H, Cody MJ, Franks Z, Tolley ND, Kahr WH, Lindemann S, Seizer P, Yost CC, Zimmerman GA, Weyrich AS. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002355. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Langer HF, Daub K, Braun G, Schonberger T, May AE, Schaller M, Stein GM, Stellos K, Bueltmann A, Siegel-Axel D, Wendel HP, Aebert H, Roecken M, Seizer P, Santoso S, Wesselborg S, Brossart P, Gawaz M. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007;27:1463. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.141515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Elzey BD, Sprague DL, Ratliff TL. Cellular Immunology. 2005;238:1. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2005.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Henn V, Slupsky JR, Grafe M, Anagnostopoulos I, Forster R, Muller-Berghaus G, Kroczek RA. Nature. 1998;391:591. doi: 10.1038/35393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Banchereau J, Briere F, Caux C, Davoust J, Lebecque S, Liu Y-J, Pulendran B, Palucka K. Ann. Rev. Immuno. 2000;18:767. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.van Kooten C, Banchereau J. J. Leuko. Bio. 2000;67:2. doi: 10.1002/jlb.67.1.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Caux C, Massacrier C, Vanbervliet B, Dubois B, Van Kooten C, Durand I, Banchereau J. J. Exp. Med. 1994;180:1263. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.4.1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Borrow P, Tishon A, Lee S, Xu J, Grewal IS, Oldstone MB, Flavell RA. J. Exp. Med. 1996;183:2129. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.5.2129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Schoenberger SP, Toes REM, van der Voort EIH, Offringa R, Melief CJM. Nature. 1998;393:480. doi: 10.1038/31002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Bennett SRM, Carbone FR, Karamalis F, Flavell RA, Miller JFAP, Heath WR. Nature. 1998;393:478. doi: 10.1038/30996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Renshaw BR, Fanslow WC, Armitage RJ, Campbell KA, Liggitt D, Wright B, Davison BL, Maliszewski CR. J. Exp. Med. 1994;180:1889. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.5.1889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Yang Y, Su Q, Grewal IS, Schilz R, Flavell RA, Wilson JM. J. Virol. 1996;70:6370. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.9.6370-6377.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Han S, Hathcock K, Zheng B, Kepler TB, Hodes R, Kelsoe G. J. Immuno. 1995;155:556. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Elzey BD, Tian J, Jensen RJ, Swanson AK, Lees JR, Lentz SR, Stein CS, Nieswandt B, Wang Y, Davidson BL, Ratliff TL. Immunity. 2003;19:9. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00177-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Kaneider NC, Kaser A, Tilg H, Ricevuti G, Wiedermann CJ. Int. J. Immunopath. and Pharm. 2003;16:225. doi: 10.1177/039463200301600307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Martinson JA, Bae J, Klingemann HG, Tam YK. Cytotherapy. 2004;6:487. doi: 10.1080/14653240410005249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Czapiga M, Kirk AD, Lekstrom-Himes J. Exp. Hematol. 2004;32:135. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2003.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Hagihara M, Higuchi A, Tamura N, Ueda Y, Hirabayashi K, Ikeda Y, Kato S, Sakamoto S, Hotta T, Handa S, Goto S. J. Immuno. 2004;172:5297. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.9.5297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Verschoor A, Neuenhahn M, Navarini AA, Graef P, Plaumann A, Seidlmeier A, Nieswandt B, Massberg S, Zinkernagel RM, Hengartner H, Busch DH. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12:1194. doi: 10.1038/ni.2140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Chapman LM, Aggrey AA, Field DJ, Srivastava K, Ture S, Yui K, Topham DJ, Baldwin WM, Morrell CN. J. Immuno. 2012;189:916. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Han SS, Baker BL. The Anatomical Record. 1964;149:251. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091490208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Elton CM, Smethurst PA, Eggleton P, Farndale RW. Thrombo. Haemo. 2002;88:648. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Schulz C, Leuschen NV, Fröhlich T, Lorenz M, Pfeiler S, Gleissner CA, Kremmer E, Kessler M, Khandoga AG, Engelmann B, Ley K, Massberg S, Arnold GJ. Blood. 2010;115:4102. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-230268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Rowley JW, Oler AJ, Tolley ND, Hunter BN, Low EN, Nix DA, Yost CC, Zimmerman GA, Weyrich AS. Blood. 2011;118:e101. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-339705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Mitchell WB, Li J, French DL, Coller BS. Blood. 2006;107:2713. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-07-2990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Boshkov LK, Kelton JG, Halloran PF. Br. J. Haemat. 1992;81:552. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1992.tb02991.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Semple JW, Milev Y, Cosgrave D, Mody M, Hornstein A, Blanchette V, Freedman J. Blood. 1996;87:4245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Inwald DP, McDowall A, Peters MJ, Callard RE, Klein NJ. Circ. Res. 2003;92:1041. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000070111.98158.6C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Weber KC, Alon R, Klickstein L. Inflammation. 2004;28:177. doi: 10.1023/b:ifla.0000049042.73926.eb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Chaipan C, Soilleux EJ, Simpson P, Hofmann H, Gramberg T, Marzi A, Geier M, Stewart EA, Eisemann J, Steinkasserer A, Suzuki-Inoue K, Fuller GL, Pearce AC, Watson SP, Hoxie JA, Baribaud F, Pöhlmann S. J. Virol. 2006;80:8951. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00136-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Koshiishi I, Shizari M, Underhill CB. Blood. 1994;84:390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Iannacone M, Sitia G, Isogawa M, Marchese P, Castro MG, Lowenstein PR, Chisari FV, Ruggeri ZM, Guidotti LG. Nat. Med. 2005;11:1167. doi: 10.1038/nm1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Elzey BD, Schmidt NW, Crist SA, Kresowik TP, Harty JT, Nieswandt B, Ratliff TL. Blood. 2008;111:3684. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-091728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Sowa J, Crist S, Ratliff T, Elzey B. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2009;57:235. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0032-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Gerdes N, Zhu L, Ersoy M, Hermansson A, Hjemdahl P, Hu H, Hansson GK, Li N. Thromb. Haem. 2011;106:353. doi: 10.1160/TH11-01-0020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Zhu L, Huang Z, Stålesen R, Hansson GK, Li N. J. Thromb. Haemos. 2014;12:1156. doi: 10.1111/jth.12612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Taub DD, Turcovski-Corrales SM, Key ML, Longo DL, Murphy WJ. J. Immunol. 1996;156:2095. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Gojova A, Brun V, Esposito B, Cottrez F, Gourdy P, Ardouin P, Tedgui A, Mallat Z, Groux H. Blood. 2003;102:4052. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Fleischer J, Grage-Griebenow E, Kasper B, Heine H, Ernst M, Brandt E, Flad H-D, Petersen F. J. Immunol. 2002;169:770. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.2.770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Liu CY, Battaglia M, Lee SH, Sun Q-H, Aster RH, Visentin GP. J. Immunol. 2005;174:2680. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.5.2680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Elzey BD, Grant JF, Sinn HW, Nieswandt B, Waldschmidt TJ, Ratliff TL. J. Leuko. Biol. 2005;78:80. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1104669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Valone FH, Austen KF, Goetzl EJ. J. Clin. Invest. 1974;54:1100–1106. doi: 10.1172/JCI107854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Lowenhaupt RW, Silberstein EB, Sperling MI, Mayfield G. Blood. 1982;60:1345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Czapiga M, Gao JL, Kirk A, Lekstrom-Himes J. Exp. Hematol. 2005;33:73. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2004.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Varon D, Shai E. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2015;13(Suppl 1):S40–S46. doi: 10.1111/jth.12976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]