Abstract
Difluoroboron β–diketonates have impressive optical properties in both solution and the solid state. In particular, both fluorescence and room-temperature phosphorescence are present when the dyes are confined to a rigid matrix, such as poly(lactic acid) (PLA). To expand current knowledge and color range capabilities of this unique type of multi-emitting chromophore, a series of thienyl-substituted BF2bdk complexes have been synthesized. The photophysical properties were investigated in methylene chloride solution and in the solid state as dye/PLA blends. By varying donor ability, i.e. methyl, phenyl, methoxyl, and thienyl substituents, and by changing the dye loading in the PLA media (0.1–10% dye loading) red-shifted emission was achieved, important for biological imaging applications. In dilute CH2Cl2 solution, complexes exhibited absorptions ranging from 350 – 420 nm, solid-state fluorescence in PLA ranging from 390 – 500 nm, and oxygen sensitive phosphorescence ranging from 540 – 585 nm in PLA blends. Promising candidates as dye/PLA blends serve as models for dyepolymer conjugates for application as biological oxygen nanoprobes.
Keywords: difluoroboron β–diketonate complexes, dye/PLA blends, fluorescence, room temperature phosphorescence, thiophene
INTRODUCTION
The chemistry of boron-based materials have attracted significant interest, as tetra-coordinated boron complexes are at the forefront of advanced functional materials.1–3 Boron β–diketonates have the unique property of having strong emission in both solution and the solid state.4,5 In solution, BF2bdks display large molar extinction coefficients,6,7 two-photon cross-sections,8,9 and high quantum efficiencies.10 Because of these desirable features, these materials have shown promise as molecular probes,11,12 OLEDs,13,14 memory devices,15 and stimuli-responsive materials.16,17
To tune the emissive properties of BF2 complexes, a broad variety of chemical modifications have been investigated. One level of modification involves altering the ligand scaffold, such as extending the π-conjugation and or the addition of heavy-atoms.18 The role of changing the anciliary ligands coordinated to the boron center has also been studied; most typically phenyl,19 pentfluorophenyl,20 or cyano groups21 have been explored. Some of these modifications lead to a smaller HOMO–LUMO energy gap, providing red-shifted absorption and emission. Such optical properties can expand the utility of BF2bdks in biological applications, given deeper tissue penetration, reduced interference from auto-fluorescence, and minimal photo-damage to biological materials.22,23 However, extending the emission properties to the deep red or to the NIR region by modifying the π-conjugation has limitations, such as thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF), which makes ratiometric oxygen sensing more challenging.24 Therefore, it is imperative to investigate new fluorophore scaffolds to gain meaningful insights into the design of dual emissive materials, with the hope of finding different ways to red-shift emission.
When difluoroboron β-diketonates are confined to a rigid matrix, both fluorescence, and oxygen sensitive, room-temperature phosphorescence (RTP) are present.5,25 In particular, BF2bdks exhibit RTP in rigid poly(lactic acid) (PLA) media, a biodegradable polyester commonly used in biomedical applications. Large Stokes shifts, controllable oxygen sensitivity, and high color tunability make these single-component materials ideal candidates for oxygen sensing, especially for tumor hypoxia imaging.18,24,26,27
Current BF2bdkPLA materials have color limitations, being that they emit mainly in the blue to yellow portion of the visible spectrum.27 Thiophene-based tetra-coordinated boron complexes have promising absorption and emission properties, making them a logical extension of dual-emissive material design.28 For example, Yam et al. have reported the synthesis of a thienyl difluoroboron diketonate with near-IR photochromic properties,29 and a solution processable, dual-boron core memory device.15 Furthermore, Zhang et al. reported a synthetic strategy of forming β-diketone initiators via one-step Claisen condensation between 2-acetylthiophene and ε-caprolactone, followed by lactide polymerization from the resulting hydroxyl functionalized boron dye.30 The dye functionalized polymer thus obtained showed intense blue fluorescence (λmax = 397 nm) and green phosphorescence (λRTP = 530 nm) under vacuum. Thiophene-based materials, mainly oligo- and polythiophenes, are thought to be some of the most versatile conjugated materials.31,32 However, weak emission in these materials is typically attributed to the inclusion of the heavy sulfur atom, as well as the efficient solid-state packing characteristic for thiophene-based materials, shown by Ono et al.33,34 However, the presence of an electron-rich thienyl ring can act as an electron-donating group, and the heavy atom inclusion may assist favorable dual-emissive properties when confined to a rigid matrix.
Our investigation of boron β-diketonates and their structure-property relationships continues with a set of thienyl substituted dyes presented herein. One aromatic unit is set as a thienyl group, while the opposing side is varied (i.e. i.e. methyl, phenyl, methoxyphenyl, and thienyl substituents), analogous to previously designed dyes.35
Photophysical properties of the dyes are studied in CH2Cl2 solution and supported by computational results utilizing density functional theory (DFT). To study the dual emissive properties, thienyl dyes were blended with poly(lactic acid) (PLA). This models how a dye-PLA conjugate would behave and serves as a valuable test and precursor to dye-polymer conjugate materials. Optical properties are tuned in two ways, by varying the dye scaffold, and by varying dye loading in PLA matrices. The purpose of attaching the C12 alkyl chain is to observe variations in dye aggregation, since C12 is a good solubilizing group.7 Dual emissive properties were analyzed for all dye/PLA blends, in order to identify good candidates for dual emissive oxygen sensitive nanoprobes.36
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Materials
Solvents CH2Cl2 and THF were dried over 3 Å molecular sieves that had been activated at 300 °C.37 All other solvents were used as received without further purification. Boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (Aldrich, purified, redistilled) and other chemicals were reagent grade from Sigma Aldrich (methyl benzoate, methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate, methyl 4-methoxybenzoate, 1-bromododecane) and Alfa Aesar (2-acetylthiophene) and were used without further purification. Methyl 4-dodecyloxybenzoate was prepared via a Williamson ether synthesis as previously described.7 Ligands 1-(thiophen-2-yl)butane-1,3-dione (mtm),38 1-phenyl-3-(thiophen-2-yl)propane-1,3-dione (tbm),39 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)propane-1,3-dione (tbmOMe),40 and 1,3-di(thiophen-2-yl)propane-1,3-dione (dtm)34 have been previously reported and the 1H NMR data are in accordance with the literature. All difluoroboron β-diketonates 1–5 were obtained via the reaction of the appropriate ligand and boron trifluoride diethyl etherate in anhydrous CH2Cl2 solution, under nitrogen. Complex 5 was prepared as previously reported.34 The 1H NMR spectra of previously reported ligands and dyes are in accordance with the literature. Poly(lactic acid) (~13 kDa; PDI = 1.02) was synthesized from ethylene glycol as previously described.24
Methods
1H NMR spectra were recorded on a UnityInova 300/51 instrument (300 MHz), or Varian VMRS/600 (600 MHz) in CDCl3. Resonances were referenced to the signal for the residual protiochloroform peak at 7.26 ppm. 1H-NMR peak frequencies are reported in ppm (δ) and coupling constants in hertz (Hz). Data are reported as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, br = broad, m = multiplet), coupling constant (Hz) and integration. Mass spectroscopy was performed on a Micromass Q-TOF Ultima spectrometer using electrospray ionization (ESI) MS techniques. UV-vis spectra were recorded on a Hewlett-Packard 8452A diode-array spectrophotometer in CH2Cl2. Steady-state fluorescence emission spectra were recorded on a Horiba Fluorolog-3 model FL3–22 spectrofluorometer (double-grating excitation and double-grating emission monochromators). The data were analyzed using FluorEssence software V 2.1 also from Horiba Jobin Yvon. Phosphorescence spectra were recorded with the same instrument except that a pulsed xenon lamp (λex= 369 nm; duration <1 ms) was used for excitation, and spectra were collected with a 2 ms delay after excitation. Fluorescence lifetime measurements (time correlated single-photon counting, TCSPC) were performed with a NanoLED-370 (369 nm) excitation source and DataStation Hub as the SPC controller. Phosphorescence lifetimes were measured with a 500 ns multichannel scalar card (MCS) excited with a pulsed xenon lamp (λex =369 nm; duration <1 ms). Lifetime data were analyzed with DataStation v2.4 software from Horiba Jobin Yvon. Thin films of dye/PLA blends were prepared on the inner wall of vials by dissolving dyes and PLA in CH2Cl2 to form a homogeneous solution then evaporating the solvent by slowly rotating the vial under a stream of nitrogen. The films were dried in vacuo for 30 min before further measurements. Lifetimes were fit to single exponential decays in solution (fluorescence) and to double or triple exponential decays in solid-state films (fluorescence/total emission and phosphorescence). Fluorescence quantum yields, ΦF, were calculated versus anthracene in EtOH as a standard using the following values: ΦF (anthracene) = 0.27,41 nD20 (EtOH) = 1.361, nD20 (CH2Cl2) = 1.424.42 Optically dilute CH2Cl2 solutions of BF2 complexes 1–5 and EtOH solutions of the anthracene standard were prepared in 1 cm path length quartz cuvettes, and absorbances (A<0.1, a.u.) and emission spectra (λex = 350 nm; emission integration range: 365 – 650 nm) were recorded. BF2 complexes 1–3 were modeled using the Gaussian 09 suite of programs utilizing density functional theory (DFT).43 B3LYP/6–31+G(d) was employed for ground state geometry optimization of all compounds with a Tomasi polarized continuum for dichloromethane solvent. Single point energy calculations were used to generate the molecular orbital diagrams utilizing 6–31G(d). Time-dependent density functional theory, TD-B3LYP/6–311+G(d), was used for estimating the absorption spectra in dichloromethane at the optimized ground state geometries.44,45 Molecular orbitals were depicted by GaussView 5 software.46
Synthesis
1-(4-(dodecyloxy)phenyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)propane-1,3-dione (tbmOC12): Acetylthiophene (1.0 g, 7.92 mmol), methyl 4-dodecyloxybenzoate (3.0 g, 9.51 mmol), and THF (25 mL) were added sequentially to a 100 mL round-bottom flask. After the mixture was stirred for 10 min, a suspension containing NaH (380 mg, 15.8 mmol) in THF (20 mL) was added via cannula at room temperature under N2. The reaction was refluxed at 60 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere, and monitored by TLC. Upon consumption of the limiting reagent, 2-acetylthiophene, (21 h), the reaction mixture was removed from the heat and allowed to cool to RT and quenched with 1 M HCl (1 mL, pH = 6 – 7). The THF was removed via rotary evaporation. Organics were extracted with CH2Cl2 (20 mL × 2), washed with H2O (20 mL × 2) and brine (10 mL) then dried over Na2SO4. After a filtration, and concentration in vacuo, the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel eluting with toluene/hexanes (5:1) to give an ivory solid (1.35 g, 41%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): 16.51 (s, 1H, -OH), 7.90 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, -ArH), 7.77 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.60 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.16-7.15 (m, 1H, -ArH), 6.95 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, -ArH), 6.61 (s, 1H, -COCHCO-), 4.01 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H, -ArOCH2-), 1.82-1.77 (m, 2H, -OCH2CH2-), 1.25 (m, br, 18H, -C9H18-), 0.87 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H, -CH2CH3). HRMS (ESI, TOF) m/z calcd for C25H35O3S [M + H]+ 415.2307, found 415.2302.
All difluoroboron β-diketonates were obtained via the reaction of appropriate ligand 1–5 and boron trifluoride diethyl etherate in CH2Cl2 solution under nitrogen. A representative reaction is provided for BF2mtm (1).
BF2mtm (1)
Boron complex 1 was prepared by dissolving 1-(thiophen-2-yl)butane-1,3-dione (mtm) (80 mg, 0.48 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (25 mL) in an oven dried 50 mL round bottom flask. Boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (88 µL, 0.71 mmol) was added via syringe and the solution turned brown. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature and monitored by TLC until the ligand was consumed (20 h). The reaction mixture was filtered and the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation. The product was purified by column chromatography with hexanes:EtOAc (3:1) as the eluent. A light yellow powder was obtained: 69 mg (67%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ [ppm]: 8.01 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H, -ArH) 7.88 (d, J= 5.1 Hz, 1H, -ArH) 7.26-7.24 (br, 1H, -ArH) 6.36 (s, 1H, -COCHCO-) 2.38 (s, 3H, -COCH3). HRMS (ESI, TOF) m/z calcd for C8H7BO2FS [M - F]+ 197.0244, found 197.0244.
BF2tbm (2)
Boron complex 2 was prepared as described for 1, using1-phenyl-3-(thiophen-2-yl)propane-1,3-dione (tbm) as the ligand. The resulting complex was purified by recrystallization from hexanes to give a yellow powder: 61 mg (64%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ [ppm]: 8.14-8.10 (m, 3H, -ArH) 7.90 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H, -ArH) 7.71-7.67 (m, 1H, -ArH) 7.58-7.53 (m, 2H, -ArH) 7.30 -7.27 (m, 1H, -ArH) 6.98 (s, 1H, - COCHCO-). HRMS (ESI, TOF) m/z calcd for C13H9O2SBF [M - F]+ 259.0400, found 259.0399.
BF2tbmOMe (3)
Boron complex 3 was prepared as described for 1 using 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)propane-1,3-dione (tbmOMe) as the ligand. The product was purified by column chromatography using CH2Cl2 as the eluent to give a yellow powder: 86 mg (80%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ [ppm]: 8.12 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 2H, -ArH), 8.05 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.83 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.26-7.24 (m, 1H, -ArH), 7.03 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 2H, -ArH), 6.90 (s, 1H, -COCHCO-), 3.94 (s, 3H, -ArOCH3). HRMS (ESI, TOF) m/z calcd for C14H11BO3FS [M - F]+ 289.0506, found 289.0505.
BF2tbmOC12 (4)
The complex 4 was prepared as described for 1 using 1-(4-(dodecyloxy)phenyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)propane-1,3-dione (tbmOC12) as the ligand. The resulting complex was purified by recrystallization from hexanes to give a yellow powder: 178 mg (80%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): 8.10 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, -ArH), 8.04 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.81 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H, -ArH), 7.25 – 7.24 (m, 1H, - ArH), 7.00 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H, -ArH), 6.87 (s, 1H, -COCHCO-), 4.06 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H, - ArOCH2), 1.84-1.79 (m, 2H, -OCH2CH2-), 1.26 (m, br, 18H, -C9H18-), 0.88 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H, -CH2CH3). HRMS (ESI, TOF) m/z calcd for C25H33O3SBF [M - F]+ 443.2228, found 443.2231.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Synthesis
The complexes 1–5 were obtained via a two-step synthesis. Claisen condensation in the presence of NaH in THF generated the β-diketone ligands followed by boronation with BF2·OEt2 in CH2Cl2. All of the ligands were obtained as tan solids and the complexes, as yellow powders. 1H NMR and MS spectroscopy confirmed the structure and purity of the ligands and boron complexes.
Optical Properties in Solution
Optical properties of dyes 1–5 were first investigated in dilute CH2Cl2 solutions (10−6 M, A < 0.10) in air and at room temperature. Highly dilute solutions prevent aggregation or exciplex formation. Solution data are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1.
Table 1.
Optical Properties of Boron Complexes 1–5 in CH2Cl2.
| Sample | λabs
a (nm) |
ε b (M−1 cm−1) |
λem
c (nm) |
τF
d (ns) |
ΦF e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF2mtm | 1 | 354 | 44 000 | 392 | 0.18 | 0.04 |
| BF2tbm | 2 | 401 | 46 400 | 416 | 1.83 | 0.31 |
| BF2tbmOMe | 3 | 417 | 56 000 | 441 | 2.06 | 0.38 |
| BF2tbmOC12 | 4 | 418 | 61 900 | 445 | 2.08 | 0.71 |
| BF2dtm | 5 | 420 | 57 200 | 438 | 1.02 | 0.39 |
Absorption maxima.
Extinction coefficients calculated at the absorption maxima.
Fluorescence emission maxima excited at 369 nm (except 1, excited at 350 nm).
Fluorescence lifetime excited with a 369 nm light-emitting diode (LED) monitored at the emission maximum. All fluorescence lifetimes are fitted with single-exponential decay.
Relative quantum yield, with anthracene in EtOH as a standard.
Figure 1.
Optical properties in CH2Cl2. A) Absorption spectra in CH2Cl2 (M = 1 × 10−6). B) Image of BF2 complexes 1–5 in CH2Cl2 upon 365 nm light irradiation. C) Steady-state emission spectra in CH2Cl2.
All boron complexes absorb light in the UV to violet range. Stronger absorption and bathochromic emission were obtained with increasing donor ability. The alkyl chain length in 3 versus 4 did not significantly affect the absorption bands (417 nm and 418 nm, respectively). The absorbance trend of dyes 1–4 was similar to that observed for previously reported BF2bdks complexes.43 The exchange of a thienyl ring for a phenyl or naphthyl aromatic group resulted in red-shifted absorption, important for biological imaging. This may be assigned to the sulfur atom acting as a donor, thus raising the energy of the HOMO.
The absorbances of dyes 3 and 4, containing terminal alkoxy groups, were slightly blue-shifted compared to 5, as reported by Ono et al.34 This may suggest alkoxy-substituted phenyl rings and thiophene moieties possessed similar electron donation and molecular geometry, for example, planarity in their ground states. The thienyl complexes 1–5 have high extinction coefficients (44,000–61,900) typical for π to π* transitions, also characteristic for thiophene-based systems, such as oligothiophenes.34
The fluorescence spectra for complexes 1 – 5 exhibited violet-blue emission in CH2Cl2 ranging from 392–445 nm, and systematically displayed red-shifts with an increase of conjugation and donor ability (i.e., in CH2Cl2, λAbs : 1 = 354 nm, 2 = 401 nm, 3 = 417 nm, 4 = 418 nm, 5 = 420 nm). Thienyl (5) and alkoxy-phenyl (3 and 4) derivatives had similar optical properties in CH2Cl2, suggesting that the two rings have similar electronic character.
As shown in Table 1, the fluorescence quantum yields and lifetimes increased with increasing electron donation for dyes 1–4. The quantum yield of complex 5 (ΦF = 39.0%) was similar to the methoxy-substituted dye 3 (ΦF = 38.0%). Overall, low quantum yields were characteristic for thiophene-based materials, compared to dbm-type boron dyes, which often have intense emission and quantum yields near unity.10 This can be attributed to fluorescence quenching due to the heavy atom effect of the sulfur atom. Complexes 2–4 have fluorescence lifetimes between 1.82 and 2.08 ns, similar values to symmetrically substituted phenyl BF2bdks (~ 2.0 ns). The symmetric BF2dtm dye 5 had much shorter lifetime, 1.02 ns. The lowest quantum yield and lifetime was observed for 1, analogous to the phenyl-methyl dye.35
Computational Studies
For most compounds, the computed absorption maxima (λabs) are in good agreement with the experimental values (Tables S3–S4). The one exception to this is complex 2, for which the computed λabs is blue-shifted ~20 nm compared to the experimental value. The absorption spectra are almost entirely dominated by HOMO to LUMO transitions. Furthermore, the HOMO to LUMO transitions appeared to be π to π* corresponding to a S0 →S1 transition, with no intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) bands evident from the experimental absorption spectra. All of the dyes exhibit relatively small Stokes shifts (i.e. 900–2739 cm−1). It is typical for fluorophores with strong ICT character to exhibit large Stokes shifts corresponding to a dramatic change in excited state geometry. The computationally generated molecular orbital diagrams also support this qualitatively. Only a slight transfer of amplitude seems to occur from the aromatic rings to the difluoroboron β-diketone moiety when going from the HOMO to the LUMO of these compounds (Figure 2). This is an interesting result. In the past, we have observed transitions predominantly π to π* in character when studying BF2 complexes with symmetrical diarene ligands. However, when the compound contains an unsymmetrical diarene ligand, the HOMO to LUMO transition typically shows strong ICT. In this case, we observe unsymmetrical compounds with very little ICT character evident. Perhaps this is due to the thiophene ring being relatively similar in size and electronic character to the phenyl ring, in contrast to a napthylene or anthracene moiety, for example in previous studies.43 In the case of the thiophene-methyl compound 1, that the reason why no strong ICT is observed may be because the methyl moiety is slightly electron donating and would, therefore, be poor at accepting amplitude in any kind of charge transfer situation. As a result, we only observe a slight qualitative charge transfer in the MO diagrams from the thiophene ring to the BF2 moeity. Ono et al. have previously performed calculations on compound 5 using similar methods to our own. As would be expected for the symmetrical BF2bdk, the HOMO to LUMO transition of this compound is also π to π* in character according to their generated MO diagrams.
Figure 2.
Calculated HOMO and LUMO molecular orbitals for 1–3 indicating π to π* character.
Optical Properties of Dye/PLA Blends
Optical properties of the dyes were also analyzed in PLA matrices. Poly(lactic acid) is a biocompatible polymer commonly used in biomedical research, and creates a more rigid environment (high glass transition temperature) necessary to produce multiemissive properties from boron dyes.5,47 Solutions of dye plus PLA mixtures were coated on the inner wall of vials, and dried in vacuo overnight before the measurements were taken. The solid-state photophysical properties, both fluorescence and phosphorescence, were studied in air and nitrogen (i.e. deoxygenated) environments. The fluorescence properties are listed in Table 2, and phosphorescence properties are presented in Table 3.
Table 2.
Fluorescence Properties of Dye/PLA Blends in Air
| 1/PLA | 2/PLA | 3/PLA | 4/PLA | 5/PLA | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dye loading |
λem
a (nm) |
τpw0
b (ps/ns) |
λem
a (nm) |
τpw0
b (ns) |
λem
a (nm) |
τpw0
b (ns) |
λem
a (nm) |
τpw0
b (ns) |
λem
a (nm) |
τpw0
b (ns) |
| 0.1% | 393 | c | 415 | c | 438 | 1.23 | 435 | 2.68 | 433 | 1.06 |
| 1% | 395 | c | 433 | 0.95 | 453 | 2.24 | 441 | 2.50 | 448 | 1.32 |
| 2% | 397 | c | 438 | 0.67 | 458 | 2.00 | 464 | 2.42 | 457 | 1.23 |
| 5% | 400 | c | 440 | 0.47 | 442 | 1.00 | 469 | 2.31 | 493 | 2.68 |
Fluorescence emission maxima excited at 369 nm (except for 1/PLA excited at 350 nm).
Fluorescence lifetime excited with a 369 nm light-emitting diode (LED) monitored at the emission maximum. All fluorescence lifetimes are fitted with multi-exponential decay.
Signal too weak to be detected with current LED excitation.
Table 3.
Phosphorescence Properties for Dye/PLA Blends Under Nitrogen.
| 1/PLA | 2/PLA | 3/PLA | 4/PLA | 5/PLA | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dye loading |
λRTP (nm) |
τpw0
b (ms) |
λRTP (nm) |
τpw0
b (ms) |
λRTP (nm) |
τpw0
b (ms) |
λRTP (nm) |
τpw0
b (ms) |
λRTP (nm) |
τpw0
b (ms) |
| 0.1% | 543 | 92.6 | 557 | 109.7 | 558 | 59.6 | 567 | 73.9 | 572 | 137.0 |
| 1% | 543 | 82.8 | 555 | 105.5 | 568 | 72.4 | 560 | 38.3 | 576 | 123.2 |
| 2% | 546 | 58.2 | 569 | 77.6 | 563 | 62.9 | 567 | 26.8 | 572 | 110.9 |
| 5% | 550 | 44.7 | 571 | 60.1 | 570 | 76.4 | 562 | 3.45 | 584 | 38.8 |
Phosphorescence maxima under N2 excited at 369 nm.
Pre-exponential weighted lifetimes fitted to triple exponential decay.
As shown previously in model studies of dye/PLA mixtures, the fluorescence is highly dependent on dye loading. In dilute dye/PLA blends (0.1% or 1.0%), the fluorescence maxima are often similar to the corresponding data in CH2Cl2 (i.e. dye 3, λDCM = 441 nm, λPLA (0.1%) = 438 nm). For dye blends at higher concentration, the emission maxima were significantly more red-shifted when compared to CH2Cl2 (Figures 6 and S1–S4).9 When analyzing higher dye loadings (~10%), visible phase separation occurred and the emission became irreproducable and random. Depending on the analyzed area on the vial, the fluorescence would change colors (Figure S1). For higher dye loadings without phase separation, dye-polymer conjugates are preferable to dye/polymer blends. As shown in Figure 3, all dyes exhibited violet to blue emission, with a red shift in fluorescence wavelength with increased conjugation and donor ability (i.e., at 2% dye loading, λF: 1 = 397 nm, 2 = 438 nm, 3 = 458 nm, 4 = 464 nm, 1 = 457 nm).
Figure 3.
Dye dependent fluorescence of thienyl BF2bdks in PLA (A) Image showing emission (excitation by UV lamp) of 2% blends under ambient conditions. (B) Total emission spectrum for 2% blends (excitation = 369 nm).
Establishing structure-property relationships of BF2bdks in PLA is important for designing new dye materials. Previously, it was observed that π–conjugation played a key role in molecular weight (i.e. dye loading) color tunability. For example, difluoroboron dibenzoylmethane (BF2dbm) dyes reach a maximum blue-shift in ~20 kDa PLA polymers (~1.5 % dye),9 while difluoroboron dinaphthoylmethane (BF2dnm) dyes required ~30 kDa PLA polymers to maximally blue shift.24 The thiophene complexes 1–5 follow this trend as well. For dye 1 (BF2mtm), with a single thiophene ring, the shift in fluorescence maxima from 5% dye loading to 0.1% dye loading (Δλ) is only 7 nm (5%: λ = 400 nm, 0.1%: λ = 393 nm). In contrast, dye 5 (BF2dtm) has a Δλ of 60 nm. With larger fluorophores with a tendency to associate (e.g. π stack) the likelihood of forming different aggregation states with different colors is a possible explanation for the different color ranges among the dyes (Figure S2–S4). The presence of the alkyl chain in 4 had a surprising effect on the dye loading color tunability. Initially, we theorized that with the increased solubility of the fluorophore due to the alkyl chain, the propensity for aggregation would decrease, resulting in a blue-shifted emission. However, as seen in Figure 4, the C12 chain in 4 resulted in visible red-shifted emission, whereas the C1 derivative (3) only showed a weak red-shifted shoulder at ~600 nm. It is possible that the C12 chain acted as an organizing group within the PLA, fostering assembly and microphase separation, as was previously seen for Rhodamine B-C12 dye in PLA reported by Zhang et al. Attaching organizing groups to the fluorophore may be an important new strategy for achieving red-shifted emission within PLA matrices.
Figure 4.
Total emission spectrum for PhOMe and PhOC12 dyes 3 and 4 respectively as PLA blends showing fluorescence changes with dye loading (excitation = 369 nm).
While the fluorescence is sensitive to dye structure and dye loading, phosphorescence color is only tunable by dye structure. As previously reported, BF2bdk dyes exhibit room temperature phosphorescence (RTP) in rigid media such as poly(lactic acid) (Tg ~ 60°C).25 All complexes showed phosphorescence in a nitrogen atmosphere (deoxygenated). Data are collected in Table 3. Because the complexes do not have a halide heavy atom substituent, such as bromide of iodide typically used to enhance the phosphorescence properties of BF2bdks,24 there is little to no change in the total emission spectra when going from an oxygenated to a deoxygenated environment. In some thienyl dye/PLA blends, the total emission spectra under nitrogen revealed red shoulders and broadening peaks, attributed to phosphorescence. In dilute blends (1%) of compounds 1 and 5, phosphorescence shoulders are evident. It is possible that sulfur is acting as the heavy atom in this situation, as these two compounds have the highest percent sulfur content. However, the effect is much less dramatic when compared to halide heavy atoms, such as bromide or iodide.24 For example, 5% blends of 1–3 show noticeable red peaks and 4 shows a slight peak broadening under nitrogen. The phosphorescence properties of the thienyl dyes varied similarly to their fluorescence; with increasing conjugation length and donor ability (-OMe), the phosphorescence red-shifted (i.e., at 1% dye loading λP : 1 = 543 nm, 2 = 555 nm, 3 = 568 nm, 4 = 560 nm, 5 = 576 nm) (Figure 5). The dye/PLA blends show an impressive range of colors from green, to yellow and orange RTP, except for 1, for which the phosphorescence was faintly visible to the naked eye. However, it was readily detected via more sensitive optical instrumentaton.
Figure 5.
Room-temperature phosphorescence properties of 1% dye/PLA blends of thienyl BF2bdks. Image: (F) blends under N2 (λex = 369 nm), (RTP) picture taken with light source turned off. Spectra: total emission in air (solid lines) and N2 (dashed lines) and delayed emission spectra (gray lines). Excitation of dyes = Xenon lamp set to 369 nm, except for 1 was excited at 350 nm. Delayed emission spectra taken with a 2 ms delay.
CONCLUSIONS
A new series of thienyl-substituted BF2bdk complexes was synthesized and characterized to study the effects of conjugation and substituents on optical properties. The photophysical properties were investigated in methylene chloride solution and in the solid state as dye/PLA blends. The emission wavelengths were tuned in two ways: by varying the ligand structure (i.e. methyl, phenyl, methoxyphenyl, and thienyl substituents) and by varying dye loading in PLA matrices (0.1–10% dye loading).
In CH2Cl2 solution, all boron complexes absorb light in the UV to violet range and exhibit violet-blue emission. Stronger absorption and bathochromic emission were obtained with increasing donor ability. The absorption spectra of the boron compounds were entirely dominated by HOMO to LUMO transitions which appeared to be π to π* corresponding to a S0 →S1 transition. The fluorescence spectra in the solid state were highly sensitive to the ligand structure and dye loading. All dyes exhibited violet to blue emission, with a red shift in fluorescence wavelength with conjugation and donor ability. The most red-shifted emissions were achieved for the symmetric dye, BF2dtm (5) in PLA blends, despite the fact that in CH2Cl2 solution, substituted phenyl derivatives 3 and 4 had more red-shifted maxima.
There is little to no change in the total emission spectra for the thienyl-substituted dyes in air versus nitrogen, most likely because the complexes do not have halide, heavy atom substituents, such as Br or I.26 However, all blends showed a phosphorescence afterglow in an oxygen-free nitrogen atmosphere. The phosphorescence properties of the thienyl dyes displayed red-shifted emission with increasing conjugation length and donor ability, and showed an impressive range of colors from green to orange. Future research will be extended to a series of compounds containing bromide and iodide heavy atom substituents, to obtain materials with intense and well separated fluorescence and phosphorescence peaks for ratiometric sensing.27 Additionally, dye-polymer conjugates will be prepared.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA167250, P30 CA44579). We also thank Tristan Butler, Caroline Kerr and Margaret Daly for helpful discussions.
Footnotes
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information
Computational data of compounds 1–3, total emission spectra of 10% dye/PLA blends, and dye loading affects compounds 1, 2 and 5, are available in the supporting information.
REFERENCES
- 1.Mukherjee S, Thilagar P. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:10988–11003. doi: 10.1039/c5cc03114a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mei J, Leung NLC, Kwok RTK, Lam JWY, Tang BZ. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:11718–11940. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mukherjee S, Thilagar P. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2015 [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nagai A, Kokado K, Nagata Y, Chujo Y. Macromolecules. 2008;41:8295–8298. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang G, Chen J, Payne SJ, Kooi SE, Demas JN, Fraser CL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:8942–8943. doi: 10.1021/ja0720255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nguyen ND, Zhang G, Lu J, Sherman AE, Fraser CL. J. Mater. Chem. 2011;21:8409–8415. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang G, Singer JP, Kooi SE, Evans RE, Thomas EL, Fraser CL. J. Mater. Chem. 2011;21:8295–8299. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cogné-Laage E, Allemand J-F, Ruel O, Baudin J-B, Croquette V, Blanchard-Desce M, Jullien L. Chem. Eur. J. 2004;10:1445–1455. doi: 10.1002/chem.200305321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang G, Kooi SE, Demas JN, Fraser CL. Adv. Mater. 2008;20:2099–2104. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Morris WA, Liu T, Fraser CL. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2015;3:352–363. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pitter DRG, Brown AS, Baker JD, Wilson JN. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015;13:9477–9484. doi: 10.1039/c5ob01428j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chongzhao R, Xiaoyin X, Raymond SB, Ferrara BJ, Neal K, Bacskai BJ, Medarova Z, Moore A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:15257–15261. doi: 10.1021/ja9047043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li D, Zhang H, Wang Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42:8416–8433. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60170f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kajiwara Y, Nagai A, Tanaka K, Chujo Y. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2013;1:4437–4444. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Poon C-T, Wu D, Lam WH, Yam VW-W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;127:10715–10719. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Galer P, Korosec RC, Vidmar M, Sket B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:7383–7394. doi: 10.1021/ja501977a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang G, Lu J, Sabat M, Fraser CL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:2160–2162. doi: 10.1021/ja9097719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Samonina-Kosicka J, DeRosa CA, Morris WA, Fan Z, Fraser CL. Macromolecules. 2014;47:3736–3746. doi: 10.1021/ma5006606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang L, Wang K, Zou B, Ye K, Zhang H, Wang Y. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:2918–2922. doi: 10.1002/adma.201500589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang L, Wang K, Zhang H, Jiao C, Zou B, Ye K, Zhang H, Wang Y. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:7701–7704. doi: 10.1039/c5cc01113b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhou Y, Chen Y-Z, Cao J-H, Yang Q-Z, Wu L-Z, Tung C-H, Wu D-Y. Dyes Pigments. 2015;112:162–169. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang X, Wolfbeis OS. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:3666–3761. doi: 10.1039/c4cs00039k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Weissleder R. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001;19:316–317. doi: 10.1038/86684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.DeRosa CA, Samonina-Kosicka J, Fan Z, Hendargo HC, Weitzel DH, Palmer GM, Fraser CL. Macromolecules. 2015;48:2967–2977. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang G, Fiore GL, Clair TLS, Fraser CL. Macromolecules. 2009;42:3162–3169. [Google Scholar]
- 26.DeRosa CA, Kerr C, Fan Z, Kolpaczynska M, Mathew AS, Evans RE, Zhang G, Fraser CL. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:23633–23643. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b07126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang G, Palmer GM, Dewhirst MW, Fraser CL. Nat. Mater. 2009;8:747–751. doi: 10.1038/nmat2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kubota Y, Tanaka S, Funabiki K, Matsui M. Org. Lett. 2012;14:4682–4685. doi: 10.1021/ol302179r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Poon C-T, Lam WH, Wong H-L, Yam VW-W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:13992–13993. doi: 10.1021/ja105537j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang X, Cui M, Zhou R, Chen C, Zhang G. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014;35:566–573. doi: 10.1002/marc.201300834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yin X, Chen J, Lalancette RA, Marder TB, Jäkle F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:9761–9765. doi: 10.1002/anie.201403700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cinar ME, Ozturk T. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:3036–3140. doi: 10.1021/cr500271a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ono K, Nakashima A, Tsuji Y, Kinoshita T, Tomura M, Nishida J, Yamashita Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2010;16:13539–13546. doi: 10.1002/chem.201001185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ono K, Yoshikawa K, Tsuji Y, Yamaguchi H, Uozumi R, Tomura M, Taga K, Saito K. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:9354–9358. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Xu S, Evans RE, Liu T, Zhang G, Demas JN, Trindle CO, Fraser CL. Inorg. Chem. 2013;52:3597–3610. doi: 10.1021/ic300077g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pfister A, Zhang G, Zareno J, Horwitz AF, Fraser CL. ACS Nano. 2008;2:1252–1258. doi: 10.1021/nn7003525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Williams DBG, Lawton M. J. Org. Chem. 2010;75:8351–8354. doi: 10.1021/jo101589h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bai Y, Chen W, Chen Y, Huang H, Xiao F, Deng G-J. RSC Adv. 2015;5:8002–8005. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Deacon GB, Junk PC, Urbatsch A. Aust. J. Chem. 2012;65:802–810. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Xing L-J, Wang X-M, Li H-Y, Zhou W, Kang N, Wang P, Wang B. RSC Adv. 2014;4:26783–26786. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Heller CA, Henry RA, McLaughlin BA, Bliss DE. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 1974;19:214–219. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Riobóo RJ, Philipp M, Ramos MA, Krüger JK. Eur. PhysJE. Soft Matter. 2009;30:19–26. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2009-10496-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ. Gaussian 09. Wallingford CT: 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Becke AD. J. Chem. Phys. 1993;98:5648–5652. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG. Phys. Rev. B. Condens. Matter. 1988;37:785–789. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.37.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dennington R, Keith T, Millam J. In Shawnee Mission KS: Semichem Inc.; 2009. Vol. GaussView Version 5. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhang X, Xie T, Cui M, Yang L, Sun X, Jiang J, Zhang G. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014;6:2279–2284. doi: 10.1021/am405209w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






