Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2016 Jul 18;9(10):777–778. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-16-0173

Deciphering the Effect of Metformin on Prostate Cancer Risk by Ethnicity

Edward Uchio 1, Frank L Meyskens 2, Ping H Wang 3,*
PMCID: PMC5098894  NIHMSID: NIHMS804890  PMID: 27432345

Prostate cancer still remains the most common malignancy in American men. In this issue, C-P Wang et al. studied the effect of metformin on prostate cancer incidence in the Veterans Administration Health Care System (1). According to their analyses, metformin had a protective effect on prostate cancer risk in the Hispanic Americans but not in Non-Hispanic White Americans, African Americans, or Asian Americans. The scope of prostate cancer apparently varies by race, with African American men reported to have a higher incidence, more advanced anatomic stage at time of diagnosis, and higher cancer-specific mortality. Potential biological explanations for these disparities include racial differences in tumor biology and responsiveness to treatment; potential extrinsic explanations include differences in access to care, patterns of screening, and treatments received. However, when these men of varying race were cared for in an equal-access health care system, differential outcomes most likely reflected variations in underlying biological factors.

Metformin has been widely used as a first-line therapy for Type 2 Diabetes, but its exact mechanism is not completely understood. The pharmaceutical effects of metformin are mediated through the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling, as well as AMPK-independent pathways (2). AMPK plays a key role in sensing and regulating ATP-AMP homeostasis. AMPK increases ATP production through fatty acid and glucose metabolism, promotes catabolism, and attenuates oxidative stress and inflammation. Dysfunction of AMPK signaling has been implicated in the development of cancers, but there were conflicting opinions regarding the roles of AMPK signaling in cancer cells (3, 4). The positive action of AMPK signaling on cell growth and its anti-oxidative stress effect suggested a tumor-promoting effect, whereas the tumor suppressor LKB1 could phosphorylate AMPK-alpha subunit and loss of LKB1/APMK signaling might aggravate tumor progression (3, 4). This makes AMPK seem like the two-faced Roman god Janus in cancer biology. There is evidence that metformin has AMPK-independent pharmacological actions. Metformin may modulate mitochondria oxidative phosphorylation, oxidative stress, and inflammation in the absence of AMPK. However, it is not entirely clear how AMPK-independent actions of metformin regulate cancer biology.

Glycerin-N-methyltransferase (GNMT) is expressed at high levels in prostate and pancreas. GNMT plays a critical role in the development of prostate cancer by catalyzing transfer of methyl group to DNA and histones that eventually transforms neoplastic gene programming (5). Metformin suppressed DNA methylation in pancreatic islet cells (6). Although whether the anti-cancer effect of metformin in prostate involves this mechanism is not known, GNMT genotyping data raised the possibility that the impact of genetic variations can be divergent in different races. In European Americans, GNMT rs1094859 allele variations were associated with increased risk for non-aggressive prostate cancer but not aggressive cancer (7). However, the same allele was not associated with non-aggressive prostate cancer risk and had a protective association against aggressive prostate cancer in Taiwanese men (8). For diabetes control, there is also evidence that the efficacy of metformin for glycemic control is not uniform across different ethnic groups. For example, African Americans appeared to be more responsive to metformin than Caucasians (9). Further study is needed to analyze the effect of metformin on prostate cancer risk in the context of genetic polymorphism across different ethnicities.

The effect of metformin on cancer risk and prognosis has not been consistent in previous studies (10). The anti-cancer action of metformin may vary under different genetic backgrounds, anti-neoplastic drugs, and metabolic status. Metformin can modulate hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, which had been linked to higher prostate cancer risk (11). But the status of hyperinsulinemia was rarely investigated in the context of metformin and prostate cancer in epidemiology studies. Mitochondria is a target of metformin actions, and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis plays a key role in prostate cancer response to non-surgical treatments. Diverse mitochondrial DNA haplogroups have been recognized in different female inheritance lineage through human evolution and dates back to the human ancestor in Africa and subsequent migration around the world (12). Each ethnic group and subgroup retains unique mitochondria genetic signatures. Specific haplogroups had been associated with human cancer and metabolic diseases (12, 13). It will be interesting to analyze whether differential effects of metformin on prostate cancer in different ethnicity can be explained by mitochondria genetics or the genetics of nuclear genes that modulate mitochondria function.

Metformin is one of the most prescribed medications in the United States, and prostate cancer is the most common male malignancy. To clarify the effect of metformin on prostate cancer in future studies, there is a need to better integrate race-specific genetics and metabolic profile in a mechanistic carcinogenesis model with cancer incidence and survival.

References

  • 1.Wang C-P, Lehman DM, Lam YWF, Kuhn LG, Mahalingam D, Weitman S, et al. Metformin for Reducing Racial/Ethnic Difference in Prostate Cancer Incidence for Men with Type 2 Diabetes. Cancer Prev Res. 2016;9:XXX–XXX. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pernicova I, Korbonits M. Metformin–mode of action and clinical implications for diabetes and cancer. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10:143–56. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lin R, Elf S, Shan C, Kang HB, Ji Q, Zhou L, et al. 6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase links oxidative PPP, lipogenesis and tumour growth by inhibiting LKB1-AMPK signalling. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17:1484–96. doi: 10.1038/ncb3255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Monteverde T, Muthalagu N, Port J, Murphy DJ. Evidence of cancer-promoting roles for AMPK and related kinases. FEBS J. 2015;282:4658–71. doi: 10.1111/febs.13534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Song YH, Shiota M, Kuroiwa K, Naito S, Oda Y. The important role of glycine N-methyltransferase in the carcinogenesis and progression of prostate cancer. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:1272–80. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ishikawa K, Tsunekawa S, Ikeniwa M, Izumoto T, Iida A, Ogata H, et al. Long-term pancreatic beta cell exposure to high levels of glucose but not palmitate induces DNA methylation within the insulin gene promoter and represses transcriptional activity. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0115350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen M, Huang YL, Huang YC, Shui IM, Giovannucci E, Chen YC, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of the glycine N-methyltransferase and prostate cancer risk in the health professionals follow-up study. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Huang YC, Lee CM, Chen M, Chung MY, Chang YH, Huang WJ, et al. Haplotypes, loss of heterozygosity, and expression levels of glycine N-methyltransferase in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1412–20. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Florez JC. It’s not black and white: individualizing metformin treatment in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:3125–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Foretz M, Guigas B, Bertrand L, Pollak M, Viollet B. Metformin: from mechanisms of action to therapies. Cell Metab. 2014;20:953–66. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Albanes D, Weinstein SJ, Wright ME, Männistö S, Limburg PJ, Snyder K, et al. Serum insulin, glucose, indices of insulin resistance, and risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1272–9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wallace DC, Chalkia D. Mitochondrial DNA genetics and the heteroplasmy conundrum in evolution and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5:a021220. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a021220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wallace DC. Mitochondria and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:685–98. doi: 10.1038/nrc3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES