Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Nov 8;6:36400. doi: 10.1038/srep36400

Chondrogenic Potential of Peripheral Blood Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Seeded on Demineralized Cancellous Bone Scaffolds

Shao-Jie Wang 1,2,*, Dong Jiang 1,*, Zheng-Zheng Zhang 1, Ai-Bing Huang 1, Yan-Song Qi 1, Hai-Jun Wang 1, Ji-Ying Zhang 1, Jia-Kuo Yu 1,a
PMCID: PMC5099580  PMID: 27821864

Abstract

As a cell source with large quantity and easy access, peripheral blood mesenchymal stem cells (PBMSCs) were isolated and seeded in porcine demineralized cancellous bone (DCB) scaffolds, cultured in chondrogenic medium and evaluated for in vitro chondrogenesis. Bone marrow MSCs (BMMSCs) and articular cartilage chondrocytes (ACCs) underwent the same process as controls. The morphology, viability and proliferation of PBMSCs in DCB scaffolds were similar to those of BMMSCs and ACCs. PBMSCs and BMMSCs showed similar chondrogenesis potential with consistent production of COL 2 and SOX 9 protein and increased COL 2 and AGC mRNA expressions at week 3 but the COL 2 protein production was still less than that of ACCs. Minimal increase of hypertrophic markers was found in all groups. Relatively higher ALP and lower COL 10 mRNA expressions were found in both MSCs groups at week 3 than that in ACCs, whereas no significant difference of COL 1 and SOX 9 mRNA and MMP 13 protein was found among all groups. To conclude, PBMSCs shared similar proliferation and chondrogenic potential with BMMSCs in DCB scaffolds and could be an alternative to BMMSCs for cartilage tissue engineering. Further optimization of chondrogenesis system is needed regardless of the promising results.

Cartilage injury due to trauma or articular inflammatory disease is one of the major causes of disability in both developing and developed countries, and has therefore become an increased social and economic burden. The injured cartilage has poor intrinsic regenerative capacity and cell-based tissue engineering present a prospective treatment strategy for cartilage lesion. Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has been developed to treat cartilage defects since 19871. However, several major concerns have been reported such as donor-site morbidity, limited number of available cells, and rapid dedifferentiation of chondrocytes when expanded in vitro2,3. Hence, alternative cell sources have been explored and the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) separated from different tissues were most popular due to their potential of proliferation and differentiation4,5,6. As the most extensively used MSCs, BMMSCs have its disadvantages such as limited available volume and invasiveness.

With the superiority of its less invasion and larger quantity for clinical settings, MSCs from peripheral blood (PBMSCs) have been isolated7, and used as an alternative to BMMSCs to repair bone and cartilage regeneration in vivo8,9. In our previous studies, PBMSCs of rats and rabbits were identified and confirmed similar proliferation and multi-lineage differentiation potential compared to BMMSCs10,11. However, those studies were mostly investigated in two dimensional monolayer culture which is significantly different from natural cell environment. Biological behavior of PBMSCs seeded on 3D porous scaffolds remains largely unknown. An in-depth understanding in this regard will provide more reliable and predicative information for in vivo cartilage tissue engineering,

The purpose of the present study was to explore the chondrogenic potential of the PBMSCs in demineralized cancellous bone (DCB), a commonly used 3D bioactive scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. In this study, xenogeneic DCB scaffolds derived from porcine were utilized due to sufficient size for transplantation and more extensive sources for clinical use comparing to the allograft. The rabbit PBMSCs were seeded on porcine DCB scaffolds and the cell morphology, proliferation, and chondrogenic potential of the PBMSCs were accessed. The BMMSCs and articular cartilage chondrocytes (ACCs) were seeded on the same scaffold as controls (schematic seen in Fig. 1.). We hypothesized that the PBMSCs might show similar results to the controls regarding proliferation and chondrogenic potential in 3D microenvironment.

Figure 1. Schematic of the general concept and strategy for this study.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

BMMSCs, PBMSCs and ACCs were isolated and expanded in vitro. The porcine-derived DCB scaffolds were seeded with three groups of cells for in vitro culture and subsequent analysis.

Results

Scaffold gross appearance, micro-morphology, pore sizes and porosity

A scaffold with 2 mm thickness and 6 mm in diameter was shown in (Fig. 2a). As revealed by SEM, DCB scaffolds exhibited natural porous structures with highly interconnected open pores ranging in size from 137.9–558.1 μm (Fig. 2b). The mean pore size of the DCB scaffolds was 332.3 μm [95% CI (69.6, 86.3)], and the mean porosity of the scaffolds was 77.9 ± 0.03%.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Representative macroscopic images of demineralized cancellous bone (DCB) scaffolds (scale bar = 5 mm). (b) Typical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image revealing that DCB scaffolds have a spongy 3D structure with open and interconnected micropores of various pore sizes (scale bar = 100 μm).

Cell attachment, distribution and viability

After 24 h of culture, SEM observation revealed that the cells of all the groups have firmly attached to the surface and micropores, forming interconnections and clusters. Similar to the BMSCs, the PBMSCs showed multiple morphologies with elongated or polygonal shape. The ACCs appeared polygonal or cobblestone-like morphology (Fig. 3a–c).

Figure 3. Representative images of attachment, distribution, viability and morphology of BMMSCs, PBMSCs, and ACCs in DCB scaffolds.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a–c) Scanning electron micrograph images of scaffolds seeded with different cells showing excellent cell attachment after 24 h of culture. (Scale bar = 100 μm); (d–f) 3D renderings of live and dead cells in 3D scaffolds after 72 h of culture (Scale bar = 300 μm). (g–i) Confocal microscopic images of Live/Dead staining demonstrated in vitro cell proliferation and viability of three groups in 3D scaffolds after 72 h of culture. Red, dead cells; green, live cells (Scale bar = 500 μm). (j–l) Immunofluorescent staining revealing cell morphology ((j): BMMSCs, k: PBMSCs, (l): ACCs) after 1 week of chodrogenic induction culture. (Red, Rhodamine phalloidin stained cytoskeleton; blue, Hoechst stained nuclei, Scale bar = 25 μm).

After 72 h of culture in growth medium, majority of seeded cells survived in the scaffolds (Fig. 3d–j). 3D rendering of the cell-seeded scaffolds showed that PBMSCs, BMMSCs and ACCs distributed evenly in both surface and inner part of the DCB scaffold. Although there was a minimal number of dead cells in the PBMSCs group, no significant difference of live cell percentage was found among the three groups (n = 5, p > 0.05, Fig. 4a).

Figure 4. In vitro cell proliferation and cartilage-specific matrix production in DCB scaffolds.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Percentage of live cells detected by LIVE/DEAD staining. (b) CCK-8 assay detected that the number of cells in the three groups increased over time. (c) Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) deposition in the scaffolds by different populations of cells was assessed by DMMB assay. (d) DNA content assessment showed increased DNA contents in various cell-seeded DCB scaffolds at various time points. (Results are expressed as mean ± 95% CI, n = 5, *P < 0.001).

After chondrogenic culturing for 1 week, cytoskeleton staining showed that the cells in DCB scaffolds of all groups displayed a similarly rounded shape (Fig. 3j–l). The both MSCs shifted from a fusiform fibroblast-like morphology to a rounded chondrocyte-like shape of groups, indicating the possible phenotype changes upon chondrogenic induction.

In vitro cell proliferation on 3D scaffolds

The Cell Counting Kit-8 assay demonstrated the proliferation of all the three groups during the first week (Fig. 4b). The number of PBMSCs and BMMSCs were initially higher than ACCs group at day 1. Thereafter, no significant difference was found among three groups at day 7 and the results were comparable to those at day 5, except the PBMSC group showed further increased proliferation.

DNA contents of all the three groups further increased during 3 weeks of culture (Fig. 4D). PBMSCs showed relatively lower DNA content at day 3 compared to BMMSCs and ACCs. However, the DNA content of both MSCs groups increased and reached a similar level at day 21, which was significantly higher than that of ACCs group (n = 5, p < 0.001).

Cartilage-specific gene expression analyses

We assessed the hyaline-cartilage specific genes SRY-related high mobility group-box gene 9 (SOX 9), aggrecan (AGC), collagen type II (COL 2), fibrous cartilage-related gene collagen type I (COL 1), and osteogenesis marker alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and collagen type X (COL 10). Significant differences in gene expression were found between day 14 and day 21 (Fig. 5). For the MSCs-seeded constructs (BMMSCs and PBMSCs), greater up-regulation of COL 2, ALP and COL 10were observed at day 21 compared to that at day 14 (n = 3, p < 0.05). For the ACCs-seeded constructs, significantly lower expression of COL 2, AGC and ALP was found at day 21 compared to day 14 (n = 3, p < 0.05). Despite an increase for both MSCs constructs and a decrease for ACCs constructs, COL 1 expression in both MSCs and ACCs constructs remained stable after 14 days of culture. SOX 9 expressions in all groups slightly increased at day 14 and then dropped at day 21 compared to that at day 0, whereas COL 10 expressions increased after 3 weeks of culture. In addition, the gene expression varies among three cell groups. Expressions of COL 2, AGC, SOX 9 and ALP by PBMSCs and BMMSCs were still significantly lower than those by ACCs at day 14 (n = 3, p < 0.05). However, at day 21, Sox 9 and AGC expressions in MSCs-seeded constructs were similar to those in ACCs-seeded constructs (n = 3, p > 0.05). Higher ALP expression level was found in both MSC groups, while higher COL 10 in ACCs-seeded constructs (n = 3, p < 0.05). It should be noted that the levels of ALP and COL 10 were minimal with only one-fold increase. In addition, the COL 1 expression level of both MSCs groups was similar to that in ACCs at week 3 (n = 3, p > 0.05).

Figure 5. Expression of the cartilage-specific genes, COL 2, AGC and SOX 9, fibrous-cartilage gene COL 1 and osteogenesis marker gene ALP and COL 10 within the scaffolds.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(Results are expressed as mean ± 95% CI, n = 3, *p < 0.001).

Extracellular matrix deposition on 3D scaffolds

GAG synthesis was initially strongest in ACCs seeded scaffold but decreased after 14 days. Both PBMSCs and BMMSCs groups showed continuously increased GAG secretion (Fig. 4C), reaching a similar level at day 14 and a higher level at day 21, compared to that of ACCs group. No significant difference of GAG content was found between PBMSCs and BMMSCs groups at all time points (n = 5, p > 0.05).

Immunoflurorescence images of the cell-scaffold constructs were shown in Figs 5 and 6. SOX 9 displayed nuclear localization and COL 2 was detected as an extracellular signal. After 3 weeks of in vitro chondrogenic culture, diffuse and robust extracellular signal around MSCs were observed, which was similar to that in the ACCs group. Majority of cells in three groups showed nuclear expression of SOX9 (Fig. 6). Strong COL 2 expression was detected for all the three groups (Fig. 7a–c). But in some confined areas, the distribution of COL 2 was uneven and scattered (Fig. 7d–f). COL 2 expression by MSCs in these areas is stronger than that in ACCs group (Fig. 7g). In terms of the percentage of COL 2 positive cells, the ACCs group showed significantly higher level than that that of the MSCs groups (Fig. 7h). These cells with limited expression of COL 2 could be a result of partially differentiated MSCs or hypertrophic ACCs or MSCs.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Immunofluorescence analysis of SOX9 expression in the scaffolds seeded with BMMSCs (a–c), PBMSCs (d–f), and ACCs (g–i) after 21 days of in vitro chondrogenic differentiation culture (Scale bar = 25 μm).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Immunoflurorescent staining of COL 2 in the scaffolds seeded with BMMSCs (a,b), PBMSCs (b,e), and ACCs (c,f) after 21 days of in vitro culture. Robust expression of COL 2 was present in three groups of cell-seeded scaffolds ((a–c), Scale bar = 100 μm). In a few areas ((d–f), Scale bar = 100 μm), MSCs of partial chondrogenensis produced more COL 2 than hypertrophic ACCs (g), while the percentage of MSCs secreting COL 2 is significantly less than that of ACCs (h). (Results are expressed as mean ± 95% CI, n = 3, *P < 0.001).

ELISA analysis was used to quantitatively evaluate the extracellular protein produced by the cells in constructs. As shown in Fig. 8a, content of COL 2 in the culture medium of both MSCs groups increased over a 3-week period of in vitro culture. The COL 2 content in the culture medium of the ACCs group gradually decreased but was still significantly higher than that in both MSCs groups at week 3. Meanwhile, hypertrophic marker matrix metallopeptidase 13 (MMP 13) in the culture medium increased over time in all groups; the level of MMP 13 peaked at week 2 in both MSCs groups, but subsequently decreased to a level similar to that in the ACCs group at week 3 (Fig. 8b). The expression of COL 2 was also evaluated by Western blotting analysis of the cell-scaffolds lysate (Fig. 8c,d). Both MSCs groups secreted markedly increased content of COL 2 after 3 weeks of chondrogenic differentiation, while COL 2 production by ACCs groups decreased in the same period. Consistent with the ELISA results, the COL 2 production was higher in ACCs group than that in MSCs groups at all time points.

Figure 8. Quantification of COL 2 and MMP 13 secretion of cell-seeded scaffolds cultured under chondrogenic conditions.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(a,b) Concentration of COL 2 and MMP 13 in culture media of cell-scaffold constructs were determined by ELISA (n = 4, *p < 0.001). Data were normalized to the DNA content of cell-scaffold constructs; (c,d) Western blotting analysis of COL 2 produced by cell-seeded scaffolds undergoing chondrogenesis culture. (Results are expressed as mean ± 95% CI, n = 3, *P < 0.001).

Discussion

Loss of cartilage remains an intractable and challenging issue for clinicians. Among a number of therapeutic strategies for promoting cartilage repair, tissue engineering may offer great promise for the regeneration of damaged cartilage. For clinical practice, compared to BMMSCs, PBMSCs present unique advantages such as less invasion, easier access, and larger quantity, in comparison with BMMSCs. In the present study, we compared the survival and chondrogenic ability of PBMSCs to those of BMMSCs and ACCs in 3D scaffolds. The results of the present study found that a) PBMSCs displayed good cell viability and proliferation potential in a 3D environment; b) PBMSCs could differentiate into chondrocyte-like cells and form cartilage-specific matrix in 3D scaffolds with minimal expression of hyperthrophic markers; c) PBMSCs exhibited similar viability and chondrogenic potential in DCB scaffolds compared to BMMSCs; d) COL 2 production of PBMSCs or BMMSCs increased with time but was still less than that of early passage ACCs in DCB scaffolds. To our knowledge, this study is the first attempt to elaborate the in vitro cellular activity of PBMSCs on xenogenic DCB scaffolds in comparison with that of BMMSCs and ACCs.

According to SEM observation, three groups of cells readily attached and spread on DCB surface and inner pores. In addition, a uniform cell distribution pattern of PBMSCs with few dead cells was observed with confocal microscopy after in vitro culture for three days, which revealed high cell viability in 3D scaffolds. Moreover, a typical morphological change from a fibroblast-like to a rounded chondrocyte-like shape occurred after MSCs upon chondrogenesis induction, suggesting the MSCs acquiring chondrocyte phenotypes. Notably, CCK-8 and DNA content assays detected gradually increased number of PBMSCs, indicating continued proliferation of PBMSCs and the biocompatibility with the DCB scaffolds.

Differentiation of MSCs into chondrocytes is associated with expression of cartilage-specific genes. These genes include cartilage extracellular matrix genes, such as COL 2, AGC, and the transcription factor SOX 9, a key regulator of chondrogenic differentiation. After being seeded in DCB scaffolds and cultured in chondrogenic condition over 3 weeks, MSCs from both PB and BM expressed increased COL 2 and AGC mRNA. At the protein level, the nuclear expression of SOX 9 and extracellular deposition of COL 2 were visualized by immunoflurorescent imaging across the scaffolds. The increased expression of COL 2 protein over time by MSCs-seeded scaffolds was quantitatively confirmed by ELISA analysis of the culture media and Western blotting analysis of cell-scaffold lysate. The abundant expression of SOX9, COL 2, and GAG confirmed the chondrogenic differentiation of the PBMSCs in 3D scaffolds.

As shown in the results, the mRNA expression of the COL 2 was found to be higher in both MSC-seeded constructs than that in ACCs-seeded constructs at day 21. In contrast, the protein level of COL 2 was lower in MSCs-seeded scaffolds than that in ACCs group. In general, protein expression level is in line with the gene expression level. The reason of the discrepancies between mRNA and protein expression in our study might be due to the posttranscriptional regulation of the mRNA which has been reported previously12. For instance, microRNAs were known to regulate the target mRNA translation either through translational silencing of the mRNA or degradation of the mRNA in osteoarthritis and chondrogenesis13,14. It should be noted that there was a tendency of increased COL 2 production of both MSCs with time, thus it is reasonable to expect the same even higher level of COL 2 of MSCs groups compared to that of ACCs with longer culturing time or in vivo transplantation.

In the present study, chondrogenic PBMSCs secreted similar amount of cartilage ECM compared to BMMSCs, which provided an in vitro evidence of our previous finding in a rabbit model that PBMSCs and BMMSCs shared the same cartilage repair capacity10,11. 3D cell culture systems can more accurately mimic the actual in vivo microenvironment than 2D cultures15,16. Cellular behaviors in DCB scaffolds are thus more reflective of in vivo cellular bioactivity. The reason for the similar chondrogenisis of MSCs from PB and BM might be that PBMSCs and BMMSCs shared the same cell origin, the bone marrow17. However, chondrogenesis of MSCs varies in different 3D scaffolds18,19, thus additional comparative studies are needed to evaluate chondrogenic capacity of PBMSCs in other 3D scaffolds besides DCB.

In addition to cartilage-related components, the gene expression analysis showed increased ALP, COL 10 and COL 1 during 3 weeks of culture, and ELISA analysis also detected increased MMP 13 level in MSCs- and ACCs-seeded scaffolds. In the meantime, the expression of SOX 9 was down-regulated at day 21. These results indicated the differentiated MSCs and ACCs underwent terminal differentiation (hypertrophy) after long time culture, which was also reported in previous studies20. The chondrogenically differentiated MSCs have been reported to have the tendency to differentiate towards a hypertrophic phenotype, leading to induction of hypertrophic and osteogenic markers, such as MMP 13, ALP, and COL 121. As shown in Fig. 7, in some confined areas, the differentiated MSCs were observed to scattered but relative more COL 2 than ACCs. These areas presented a scenario during in vitro culture where some MSCs are either not completely differentiated or becoming hyperthrophic, whereas some ACCs are losing chondrocyte phenotypes. However, the levels of ALP, COL 10 and COL 1 found in our study were relatively low compared to chondrogenic markers COL 2 and AGC. The increased MMP 13 in MSC-seeded scaffolds peaked at day 14 and decreased thereafter. It has been reported that MMP 13 play a role in physiological matrix remodeling at growth plate22, and MMP-13 is constitutively produced in human chondrocytes23. Therefore, considering minimal increase level of hyperthrophic markers during 3 weeks’ culture, majority of MSCs and ACCs seeded in DCB scaffolds still maintained chondrocyte phenotypes.

Notably, differentiated MSCs produced less COL 2 than monolayer expanded ACCs did. This was consistent with previous studies which revealed differentiated MSCs expressed lower levels of COL 2 and higher levels of hypertrophic markers compared to chondrocytes24,25. In contrast, some studies found the opposed evidence that the pre-differentiated MSC-seeded scaffolds produced enhanced or similar levels of COL 2 or AGC than chondroctyes26,27,28,29. The difference might be due to varied passage of the chondrocytes used in those studies. Primary or passages 1–2 chondrocytes were used in the studies showing superiority of chondrocytes, whereas osteoarthritic or long term expanded chondrocytes were used in studies favoring induced MSCs. According to the above data, the COL 2 production of the differentiated PBMSCs might be similar to that of osteoarthritic or in vitro expanded chondrocytes. But it is still difficult to produce MSCs-derived chondrocytes similar to primary or the early passage ACCs under the current differentiation conditions in the present study. However, in vitro simulation mimicking biochemical and biomechanical conditions of the native joints has been confirmed to promote the proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs30,31, which should be further studied in the future.

Additionally, the increased fibrocartilage and osteogenic markers could be partially attributed to the scaffold material property itself, which was believed to affect resident cells behaviors such as adhesion, growth and differentiation32. COL 1 is an organic component of bones and a component of fibrous cartilage, and has been shown to stimulate bone formation33,34. The natural DCB scaffolds used in the present study were derived from natural decellular and demineralized bone matrix and are mainly composed of COL 1. This property of the scaffold might have mediated the increased expression of COL 1 and ALP by resident cells (MSCs or ACCs), as have been reported by other studies using DCB scaffolds35,36,37,38. Therefore, maintaining chondrogenesis and preventing hypertrophy of MSCs and ACCs during in vitro culture still represent a challenge in cell-based therapies. Fortunately, there have been studies showing that hydrogels prepared from natural or synthetic polymers can mimic natural microenvironment of articular cartilage, and promote chondrogenic differentiation by encapsulated cells39,40,41. With these advances, the chondrogenic conditions and biocompatible scaffold can be tuned for optimal cell adhesion and proliferation, nutrient diffusion, and growth factor delivery to reduce hypertrophy and hopefully achieve hyaline cartilage matrix production.

In the present in vitro study, xenogeneic DCB scaffolds derived from porcine were utilized due to sufficient size for transplantation and more extensive sources for clinical use comparing to the allograft. DCB mainly contains COL 1 and does not elicit immunogenic reaction, as the antigenic surface structure of DCB is destroyed during demineralization42. The excellent biocompatibility between three cell populations and xenogeneic DCB scaffolds indicated that xenogeneic DCB scaffold is a safe and bioactive material for tissue engineering and would offer substantial benefits such as comprehensive availability and large quantities.

There are still some limitations for the present study. Firstly, the DCB scaffold used in this study was a bioactive scaffold with biological interaction with the seeded cells, which might influence the proliferation and the chondrogenic potential. So it is not appropriate to generalize the results to all the scaffolds. The chondrogenic ability of the PBMSCs in the chemical synthetic 3D porous scaffolds is still unknown. Secondly, the outcome of the in vivo transplantation was still unknown in spite of the favorable result of the adhesion, proliferation and chondrogenesis result in the present in vitro study. More studies should be needed in the future.

Conclusions

The PBMSCs successfully underwent chondrogenesis in the 3D porous xenogeneic DCB scaffolds under chondrogenic conditions. No significant difference was found between the PBMSCs and the BMMSCs in terms of the adhesion, proliferation and extracellular matrix production. PBMSCs might be an alternative to BMMSCs for cartilage tissue engineering, considering the extra advantages of absence of donor site morbidity, easy availability of PB and large quantity. Further optimization of the in vitro chondrogenesis culture system is needed to yield chondrogenic MSCs more similar to the native chondrocytes.

Materials and Methods

Isolation and culture of MSCs and ACCs

All animal experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Peking University and the methods in the current work were carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Two-month-old adult New Zealand White rabbits weighing approximately 1.5 kg were used for isolation of MSCs and ACCs. BMMSC was obtained exactly as our previous report, the isolation, culture, and identification of MSCs derived from PB were performed with modification11. Rabbit mononuclear cells (MNCs) derived from PB was obtained after mobilization by granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF, Qilu Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.) and CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100. Blood (20 mL) was collected into a sterile heparinized tube from the central artery of the ear. Each blood sample was diluted 1:1 with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then loaded into an equivalent volume of 1.077 g/mL Ficoll-PaqueTM Premium solution (GE healthcare, Sweden). The MNC fraction was obtained by gradient centrifugation at 2500 rpm for 30 min and was then resuspended in complete α-MEM with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at a density of 1 × 106 cells/mL. Complete medium was refreshed every 2 to 3 days. MSCs from BM or PB at passage 5 were used for subsequent experiments.

Chondrocytes were harvested from the knee and shoulder joints of the rabbits. First, the minced cartilage samples were digested for 6 h in 10 mL of 0.2% w/v collagenase type 2 (Gibco BRL Co. Ltd.) solutions at 37 °C. The obtained cell suspension was centrifuged and resuspended in low-glucose DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (HyCloneTM, Thermo Scientific, Australia) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin. Isolated chondrocytes were cultured in monolayer cultures in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and 21% O2. Passage 2 chondrocytes were utilized for experiments.

Fabrication of DCB scaffolds

Cancellous bone was obtained from the distal femur and proximal tibia of pigs. The surrounding soft tissues of the bone segments were removed and discarded. Parallel bone resection by an oscillating saw was employed to produce 5-mm-thick bone pieces. These bone pieces were subjected to the following procedures: (1) demineralization in 0.6 mol/L hydrochloric acid at 4 °C for 7 days; (2) defatting in 1:1 (vol/vol) methanol/chloroform solution for 48 h; and (3) deproteinization with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 4 h. The samples were freeze-dried, sterilized with 25 kGy of Co60, and then trimmed into cylinders 2 mm thick and 6 mm in diameter.

Porosity measurements

Scaffold porosity was measured with a liquid displacement technique. Ethanol was used as the substitution liquid for easy penetration into the pores of the DCB scaffolds. In brief, the DCB scaffolds were immersed in a graduated cylinder containing 15 mL of ethanol for 10 min until ethanol penetrated the pores of the scaffolds. The total volume in the graduated cylinder was recorded as V1 mL. Then the drenched scaffolds were removed, and the remaining volume of ethanol was recorded as V2 mL. Porosity was calculated by equation (1).

graphic file with name srep36400-m1.jpg

Cell seeding and cell-scaffold construct culture

DCB scaffolds (2 mm thick and 6 mm in diameter) were carefully seeded with 40 μL of concentrated cell solution (5.0 × 105 cells) using a centrifugal method, as previously reported43. The cell-seeded scaffolds were incubated for 2 h to allow initial cell attachment before the addition of 1 ml of fresh medium. Both the PBMSC- and the BMMSC-seeded scaffolds were fed with chondrogenic differentiation medium (RASMX-90041; Cyagen Biosciences Inc., Guangzhou, China) after 3 days of culture in growth medium, and ACC-seeded scaffolds were cultured in low-glucose DMEM with 10% FBS for 3 days and then maintained in the same chondrogenic induction media as used for the MSCs. The culture medium was changed every 2 to 3 days until the cell-scaffold constructs were sent for subsequent analyses.

Cell distribution, morphology and viability on scaffolds

The characteristics of the scaffolds and cell morphology were observed under Scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Cell-scaffold constructs after 24 h of culture and non-seeded scaffolds were fixed immediately in a mixture of 4 mL 25% glutaraldehyde and 96 mL 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), and then dehydrated with a gradient ethanol. Critical point drying was performed in liquid CO2 at 37 °C. The specimens were vacuum-coated with a 5-nm layer of gold in a high-vacuum gold spatter coater and then viewed by a scanning electron microscope (S-2500; Hitachi High-Technologies Co, Hitachi-Naka City, Japan). Non-seeded scaffolds were cut and sputter coated with gold and analyzed with SEM. Three scaffolds were included and the size of ten pores for each scaffold was determined by using Image-pro Plus software 6.0 (Media Cybernetics).

The assessment of cell viability in the scaffolds was evaluated using a LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit assay (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The scaffolds seeded with MSCs or ACCs were cultured in respective growth medium for 72 h. Then, the scaffolds were incubated in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. Each scaffold was immersed in 250 μL of PBS with 2 mM calcein AM and 4 mM ethidium homodimer-1 reagents before incubation for 1 h at room temperature. Excitation wavelength of 568 or 488 nm was used to detect the fluorescence of ethidium homodimer-1 (dead cells = red) or calcein AM (live cells = green). Non-seeded scaffolds were also stained as blank controls to avoid scaffold background effects.

To visualize the live and dead cells in the scaffolds, the volume data were used to create 3D renderings of the cell-seeded scaffolds using Imaris software (7.4.2; Bitplane).

The morphology of the cells in the constructs cultured in chondrogenic induction medium for 1 week were also observed by confocal microscopy. Briefly, the scaffolds were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. After penetrating the cell membrane with 1% Triton X-100, the nuclei were stained with Hoechst33258 working solution (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) for 10 min. The cytoskeleton was stained by rhodamine phalloidin (100 nM; Cytoskeleton Inc., Denver, CO, USA) for 30 min at 37 °C.

Biochemical analysis for Cell proliferation

The metabolic activity of cells was quantified using a Cell Counting Kit-8 assay (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan), following the manufacturer’s instructions. At each time point, the cell-seeded scaffolds were thoroughly washed in PBS and then submersed in 10 μL of CCK-8 working solution with 90 μL of fresh medium at 37 °C for 2 h. For the subtraction of the background from the medium, wells were filled with 10 μL of CCK-8 working solution and 90 μL of fresh medium only. The optical density was then observed at 450 nm using a plate reader. The cell content was normalized with each standard curve of cells.

Proteoglycan content was estimated from the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content using a 1, 9-dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) dye-binding assay to quantify cartilaginous matrix production by cells within the scaffolds. Total GAG was normalized to scaffold wet weight and total DNA content. Briefly, 20 μL of sample was mixed with 200 μL of DMMB reagent, and absorbance was read at 525 nm. A standard curve was established from chondroitin-6-sulfate from shark (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) to compare absorbance for the samples.

The DNA content was measured using a fluorometric assay. The specimens were weighed and then digested in a prepared papain solution (containing 0.5 M EDTA, 0.05 Mcysteine-HCl, and 1 mg/mL papain enzyme) (Sigma) at 70 °C for 48 h. Aliquots of the sample digestion were stained at 37 °C for 20 min with 200 μL of Hoechst33258 working solution (2 μg/mL). The fluorescence intensities were then detected at 360 nm for excitation and 460 nm for emission. The DNA content was normalized with a standard curve of calf thymus DNA (Sigma, St Louis, Missouri, USA).

Cartilage-specific gene expression analysis

At various time points, samples were removed from culture, briefly rinsed with PBS, and minced into small pieces. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Isolated RNA was reverse-transcribed using the MMLV Reverse kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and real-time RT-PCR analysis was performed using an ABI 7300 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The real-time PCR conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 7 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s. The disassociation curve showed no nonspecific amplification. The relative expression changes in these target genes were quantified by normalizing their expression to that of the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Relative gene expression was compared to that at day 0, the values were plotted as 2−ΔΔCT. The PCR primers are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Primer sequences used for real-time PCR.

  Forward primers (5′-3′) Reverse primers (5′-3′)
COL 1 TGGCAAGAACGGAGATGACG GCACCATCCAAACCACTGAA
COL 2 CCACGCTCAAGTCCCTCAAC AGTCACCGCTCTTCCACTCG
COL 10 AAGTGGACCGAAAGGAGACA TGGAAACCCATTCTCACCTC
SOX 9 AGTAC CGCACC TGCACA AC CGCTTCTCGCTCTCGTTC AG
ACG CGTGGTCTGGACAGGTGCTA GGTTGGGGTAGAGGTAGACG
ALP CGACACGGACAAGAAACCCT TGTTGTGAGCGTAGTCCACC
GAPDH CCATCACCATCTTCCAGGAG GATGATGACCCTTTTGGCTC
Open in a new tab

COL 1: collagen type I; COL 2: collagen type II; COL 10: collagen type X; SOX 9: SRY-related high mobility group-box gene 9; AGC: aggrecan; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Quantification of GAG and DNA content

Proteoglycan content was estimated from the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content using a 1, 9-dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) dye-binding assay to quantify cartilaginous matrix production by cells within the scaffolds. Total GAG was normalized to scaffold wet weight and total DNA content. Briefly, 20 μL of sample was mixed with 200 μL of DMMB reagent, and absorbance was read at 525 nm. A standard curve was established from chondroitin-6-sulfate from shark (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) to compare absorbance for the samples.

The DNA content was measured using a fluorometric assay. The specimens were weighed and then digested in a prepared papain solution (containing 0.5 M EDTA, 0.05 Mcysteine-HCl, and 1 mg/mL papain enzyme) (Sigma) at 70 °C for 48 h. Aliquots of the sample digestion were stained at 37 °C for 20 min with 200 μL of Hoechst33258 working solution (2 μg/mL). The fluorescence intensities were then detected at 360 nm for excitation and 460 nm for emission. The DNA content was normalized with a standard curve of calf thymus DNA (Sigma, St Louis, Missouri, USA).

COL 2 and SOX 9 production analysis by immunofluorescence

The production of COL 2 and SOX 9 proteins in cell-DCB constructs were visualized through immunofluorescence after 3 weeks of chodnrogenic culture. Briefly, constructs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and then rinsed with PBS. Then the constructs were incubated with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 60 min at 37 °C followed by incubation with mouse anti-collagen type 2 primary antibody (Calbiochem, Boston, MA, USA) or rabbit anti-SOX9 antibody (Abcam,ab185230,1:2000), for 24 h at 4 °C. After through washing with PBS, the samples were incubated with Alexa Fluor® 594 goat anti-mouse or Alexa Fluor® 488 donkey anti-rabbit IgG antibodies (Invitrogen, Life Technologies) for 1 h at room temperature. The nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33258 for confocal microscopy imaging analysis. In the areas where the intensity of COL 2 fluroresence was not evenly distributed, the amount of COL 2 was quantitatively assess expressed by calculating and normalizing the fluorescence intensity of COL 2 to the number of the cells in the immunofluorescence images. The proportion of cells expressing COL 2 was calculated using the Image-Pro Plus software (6.0; Media Cybernetics).

ELISA analysis of COL 2 and MMP 13

The culture medium of cell-DCB constructs was collected at the designated time points. Supernatant was separated from insoluble residues by centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 10 min. Rabbit MMP 13 and COL 2 ELISA Kits (Cloud-Clone, Corp., Houston, TX, USA) were used to measure the COL 2 and MMP 13 in the culture medium conditioned by the cell-DCB constructs. The assay was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The COL 2 and MMP 13 concentrations were normalized to DNA content which was determined fluorimetrically using Hoechst staining as previously described.

Western blotting analysis

The cell-seeded scaffolds were harvested at the indicated time points and rinsed in cold PBS (4 °C) before being lysed in RIPA buffer (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) supplemented with complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Protein concentration was measured by BCA protein assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) using bovine serum albumin as the standard. Proteins were run on 10% SDS polyacrylamide gels and electrotransferred to PVDF membrane (Hybond-P, GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) at 4 °C for 2 h. The bands were probed with anti-COL 2 (Calbiochem, Boston, MA, USA) at 1:400 dilutions overnight at 4 °C. The proteins were detected by Immobilon Western HRP Substrate (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). GAPDH was used as an internal control.

Statistical analysis

All values are expressed as mean ± 95% confidence intervals (CI) and represent at least three independent experiments. Evaluations of COL 2 fluorescence intensity and percentage of live cells were performed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); the other data was analyzed using a two-way ANOVA test. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. When ANOVA results were significant, post-hoc analysis was performed via Tukey’s multiple comparison test. All analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism version 6.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Wang, S.-J. et al. Chondrogenic Potential of Peripheral Blood Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Seeded on Demineralized Cancellous Bone Scaffolds. Sci. Rep. 6, 36400; doi: 10.1038/srep36400 (2016).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51273004 and 31200725).

Footnotes

Author Contributions S.J.W. and D.J. equally contributed to this study: conception and design, collection and assembly of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the article; Z.Z.Z., A.B.H. and Y.S.Q.: assistance in analysis and interpretation of data; H.J.W. and J.Y.Z.: technical support on gene analysis and interpretation. J.K.Y.: conception and design, critical revision of the article, final approval of the article.

References

  1. Peterson L. et al. Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 212–234 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beane O. S. & Darling E. M. Isolation, characterization, and differentiation of stem cells for cartilage regeneration. Annals of biomedical engineering 40, 2079–2097, doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0639-8 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Matricali G. A., Dereymaeker G. P. & Luyten F. P. Donor site morbidity after articular cartilage repair procedures: a review. Acta orthopaedica Belgica 76, 669–674 (2010). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nesic D. et al. Cartilage tissue engineering for degenerative joint disease. Advanced drug delivery reviews 58, 300–322, doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.01.012 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schlegel. Scaffold-dependent differentiation of human articular chondrocytes. Int J Mol Med, doi: 10.3892/ijmm_00000074 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stoop R. Smart biomaterials for tissue engineering of cartilage. Injury 39 Suppl 1, S77–S87, doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.01.036 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang S. J. et al. The Chondrogenic Potential of Progenitor Cells Derived from Peripheral Blood: A Systematic Review. Stem cells and development, doi: 10.1089/scd.2016.0055 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hopper N. et al. Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Enhance Cartilage Repair in in vivo Osteochondral Defect Model. Plos One 10, e0133937, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133937 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wan C., He Q. & Li G. Allogenic peripheral blood derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) enhance bone regeneration in rabbit ulna critical-sized bone defect model. Journal of orthopaedic research: official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 24, 610–618, doi: 10.1002/jor.20119 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fu W. L. et al. Comparative study of the biological characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and peripheral blood of rats. Tissue engineering. Part A 18, 1793–1803, doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0530 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fu W. L., Zhou C. Y. & Yu J. K. A new source of mesenchymal stem cells for articular cartilage repair: MSCs derived from mobilized peripheral blood share similar biological characteristics in vitro and chondrogenesis in vivo as MSCs from bone marrow in a rabbit model. The American journal of sports medicine 42, 592–601, doi: 10.1177/0363546513512778 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Caron M. M. et al. Redifferentiation of dedifferentiated human articular chondrocytes: comparison of 2D and 3D cultures. Osteoarthritis and cartilage/OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society 20, 1170–1178, doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.06.016 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Le L. T., Swingler T. E. & Clark I. M. Review: the role of microRNAs in osteoarthritis and chondrogenesis. Arthritis and rheumatism 65, 1963–1974, doi: 10.1002/art.37990 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cui X. et al. Overexpression of microRNA-634 suppresses survival and matrix synthesis of human osteoarthritis chondrocytes by targeting PIK3R1. Sci Rep 6, 23117, doi: 10.1038/srep23117 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Breyner N. M. et al. Effect of a three-dimensional chitosan porous scaffold on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into chondrocytes. Cells, tissues, organs 191, 119–128, doi: 10.1159/000231472 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Benya P. Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels. Cell 30, 215–224, doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90027-7 (1982). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rankin S. M. Impact of bone marrow on respiratory disease. Curr Opin Pharmacol 8, 236–241, doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2008.01.011 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ahmed M. et al. A combinatorial approach towards the design of nanofibrous scaffolds for chondrogenesis. Sci Rep 5, 14804, doi: 10.1038/srep14804 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jeong C. G. & Hollister S. J. Mechanical and biochemical assessments of three-dimensional poly(1,8-octanediol-co-citrate) scaffold pore shape and permeability effects on in vitro chondrogenesis using primary chondrocytes. Tissue engineering. Part A 16, 3759–3768, doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0103 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chang Y., Ueng S. W., Lin-Chao S. & Chao C. C. Involvement of Gas7 along the ERK1/2 MAP kinase and SOX9 pathway in chondrogenesis of human marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Osteoarthritis and cartilage/OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society 16, 1403–1412, doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.03.018 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pelttari K. et al. Premature induction of hypertrophy during in vitro chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells correlates with calcification and vascular invasion after ectopic transplantation in SCID mice. Arthritis and rheumatism 54, 3254–3266, doi: 10.1002/art.22136 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mathieu M. et al. Involvement of angiopoietin-like 4 in matrix remodeling during chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Biol Chem 289, 8402–8412, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.539825 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yamamoto K. et al. MMP-13 is constitutively produced in human chondrocytes and co-endocytosed with ADAMTS-5 and TIMP-3 by the endocytic receptor LRP1. Matrix biology: journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology, doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.03.007 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li S., Sengers B. G., Oreffo R. O. & Tare R. S. Chondrogenic potential of human articular chondrocytes and skeletal stem cells: a comparative study. Journal of biomaterials applications 29, 824–836, doi: 10.1177/0885328214548604 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Giavaresi G. et al. Response of human chondrocytes and mesenchymal stromal cells to a decellularized human dermis. BMC musculoskeletal disorders 14, 12, doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-12 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rackwitz L., Djouad F., Janjanin S., Noth U. & Tuan R. S. Functional cartilage repair capacity of de-differentiated, chondrocyte- and mesenchymal stem cell-laden hydrogels in vitro. Osteoarthritis and cartilage/OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society 22, 1148–1157, doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.05.019 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fernandes A. M. et al. Similar properties of chondrocytes from osteoarthritis joints and mesenchymal stem cells from healthy donors for tissue engineering of articular cartilage. Plos One 8, e62994, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062994 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Facchini A. et al. Human chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cells grown onto engineered scaffold. Biorheology 43, 471–480 (2006). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ansar M. M. et al. A comparative study of aggrecan synthesis between natural articular chondrocytes and differentiated chondrocytes from adipose derived stem cells in 3D culture. Advanced biomedical research 1, 24, doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.98145 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. O’Conor C. J., Case N. & Guilak F. Mechanical regulation of chondrogenesis. Stem Cell Res Ther 4, 1–13, doi: 10.1186/scrt211 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ghezzi C. E. et al. The role of physiological mechanical cues on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in an airway tract-like dense collagen-silk fibroin construct. Biomaterials 35, 6236–6247, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.040 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Chang H.-I. & Wang Y. In Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering - Cells and Biomaterials (ed Prof. Daniel Eberli) (2011).
  33. Xiao G., Wang D., Benson M. D., Karsenty G. & Franceschi R. T. Role of the alpha2-integrin in osteoblast-specific gene expression and activation of the Osf2 transcription factor. J Biol Chem 273, 32988–32994 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Bosnakovski D. et al. Chondrogenic differentiation of bovine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in different hydrogels: influence of collagen type II extracellular matrix on MSC chondrogenesis. Biotechnology and bioengineering 93, 1152–1163, doi: 10.1002/bit.20828 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shi Y., Niedzinski J. R., Samaniego A., Bogdansky S. & Atkinson B. L. Adipose-derived stem cells combined with a demineralized cancellous bone substrate for bone regeneration. Tissue engineering. Part A 18, 1313–1321, doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0357 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhou S., Yates K. E., Eid K. & Glowacki J. Demineralized bone promotes chondrocyte or osteoblast differentiation of human marrow stromal cells cultured in collagen sponges. Cell and tissue banking 6, 33–44, doi: 10.1007/s10561-005-4253-y (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Li X., Jin L., Balian G., Laurencin C. T. & Greg Anderson D. Demineralized bone matrix gelatin as scaffold for osteochondral tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27, 2426–2433, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.040 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang X. et al. Demineralized bone matrix combined bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, bone morphogenetic protein-2 and transforming growth factor-beta3 gene promoted pig cartilage defect repair. Plos One 9, e116061, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116061 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kim I. L., Mauck R. L. & Burdick J. A. Hydrogel design for cartilage tissue engineering: a case study with hyaluronic acid. Biomaterials 32, 8771–8782, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.073 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tibbitt M. W. & Anseth K. S. Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnology and bioengineering 103, 655–663, doi: 10.1002/bit.22361 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Spiller K. L., Maher S. A. & Lowman A. M. Hydrogels for the repair of articular cartilage defects. Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews 17, 281–299, doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2011.0077 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tuli S. M. & Singh A. D. The osteoninductive property of decalcified bone matrix. An experimental study. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume 60, 116–123 (1978). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang Z. Z. et al. Potential of centrifugal seeding method in improving cells distribution and proliferation on demineralized cancellous bone scaffolds for tissue-engineered meniscus. ACS applied materials & interfaces 7, 15294–15302, doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b03129 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES