Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Nov 8;6:36292. doi: 10.1038/srep36292

Identification and characterization of the peroxin 1 gene MoPEX1 required for infection-related morphogenesis and pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae

Shuzhen Deng 1, Zhuokan Gu 2, Nan Yang 1, Ling Li 3, Xiaofeng Yue 1, Yawei Que 1, Guochang Sun 2, Zhengyi Wang 1,a, Jiaoyu Wang 2,b
PMCID: PMC5099783  PMID: 27824105

Abstract

Peroxisomes are required for pathogenicity in many phytopathogenic fungi, but the relationships between fungal pathogenicity and peroxisomal function are not fully understood. Here, we report the identification of a T-DNA insertional mutant C445 of Magnaporthe oryzae, which is defective in pathogenicity. Analysis of the mutation confirmed an insertion into the gene MoPEX1, which encodes a putative homologue to peroxin 1. Targeted gene deletion mutants of MoPEX1 were nonpathogenic and were impaired in vegetative growth, conidiation, and appressorium formation. ΔMopex1 mutants formed abnormal, less pigmented, and nonfunctional appressoria, but they were unable to penetrate plant cuticle. The ΔMopex1 mutants were defective in the utilization of fatty acids (e.g., olive oil and Tween-20). Moreover, deletion of MoPEX1 significantly impaired the mobilization and degradation of lipid droplets during appressorium development. Interestingly, deletion of MoPEX1 blocked the import of peroxisomal matrix proteins. Analysis of an M. oryzae strain expressing GFP-MoPEX1 and RFP-PTS1 fusions revealed that MoPex1 localizes to peroxisomes. Yeast two hybrid experiments showed that MoPex1 physically interacts with MoPex6, a peroxisomal matrix protein important for fungal morphogenesis and pathogenicity. Taken together, we conclude that MoPEX1 plays important roles in peroxisomal function and is required for infection-related morphogenesis and pathogenicity in M. oryzae.

Rice blast caused by the ascomycete Magnaporthe oryzae is one of the most serious rice diseases in most rice-growing areas worldwide. The rice blast disease is initiated when a three-cell conidium lands on the surface of a rice leaf. The conidium attaches and germinates and, subsequently forms a specialized infection structure called an appressorium at the tip of a germ tube. The appressorium attaches strongly to the rice leaf and generates enormous turgor (up to 8 MPa) by accumulating osmolytes such as glycerol, which is used to allow a narrow penetration peg to mechanically rupture the plant cuticle1,2,3. Eventually, the fungus spreads through the rice leaf cells and produces a visible necrotic lesion on the rice leaf surface after 3–5 days3,4.

Peroxisomes are organelles found in nearly all eukaryotic cells. They are single-membrane-bound, dynamic organelles that can change their number, size and protein composition in response to environmental conditions. In eukaryotic cells, various important metabolic processes occurr in peroxisomes. For instance, in yeasts, peroxisomes are required for metabolizing nonfermentable carbon sources such as methanol and oleate5,6,7,8,9. In plants, peroxisomes mediate a wide range of processes, including the glyoxylate cycle, detoxification, and the synthesis of phytohormones10. In humans, peroxisomes play an important role in numerous metabolic pathways, including the synthesis of plasmalogens, cholesterol, and bile acids11,12,13,14,15.

Peroxisomes contain two types of protein molecules, namely, membrane proteins and matrix proteins, but do not contain DNA or an independent protein synthesis machinery, so the two types of protein are encoded by nuclear genes and synthesized on free polysomes in the cytosol, which are targeted post-translationally to the peroxisomes16. Many integral membrane proteins are targeted to peroxisomes directly from the cytosol by the peroxisomal membrane targeting signal 1 (mPTS1), and some might be transported to peroxisomes indirectly through the ER, by mPTS217,18,19. However, matrix proteins are translocated to peroxisomes by the peroxisomal targeting signals (PTSs), at least including two types: PTS1 and PTS2. PTS1 is a conserved tripeptide (S/A/C) (H/R/K) (I/L/M) at the C-terminus, while PTS2 is a nonapeptide with the consensus motif (R/K) (L/V/I) X5 (H/Q) (L/A), which is located near the N-terminus or at internal locations in proteins8,20. These signals on matrix proteins are recognized in the cytosol by soluble PTS receptors, Pex5 for PTS1 proteins and Pex7 for PTS2 proteins16,20,21,22.

Proteins involved in peroxisomal biogenesis are named peroxins, which are encoded by PEX genes23. Up to date, 32 different PEX genes have been identified9. Results from several experiments have indicated that fungal peroxisomes are involved in plant infection. Kimura et al. first reported that Colletotrichum lagenarium PEX6 gene was required for peroxisomal function and virulence24. Similarly, in M. oryzae, Pex6-mediated peroxisome biogenesis is essential for appressorium-mediated plant infection25,26. Deletion mutants of the MoPEX6 gene produced significantly less conidia, formed nonfunctional appressoria, and were nonpathogenic to host plants26. Moreover, several genes associated with peroxisome metabolism, such as PTH2, MFP1, and MLS1, have also been identified and analyzed25,26,27,28. Recently, in M. oryzae, it has been demonstrated that MoPEX5 and MoPEX7 are both required for host infection, although MoPEX5 plays a predominant role29,30. In addition, deletion of MoPEX19 led to metabolic deficiency involved in peroxisomes, and consequently, failure to penetrate the host31.

Peroxisomes are important organelles in which β-oxidation occurrs32. Both mitochondrial and peroxisomal β-oxidation are present in mammals. In yeasts, however, β-oxidation appears to be solely a peroxisomal process33. It has been found that both mitochondrial and peroxisomal β-oxidation processes occur in Aspergillus nidulans34. In M. oryzae, lipid body is an important storage substance in conidia. Previous experiments have demonstrated that lipid droplets are mobilized from germinating conidia and taken up by vacuoles before degrading at the onset of turgor generation35,36.

Recently, we carried out a large-scale AtMT (Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation) in M. oryzae to identify insertional mutants and define novel genes required for pathogenicity. Several important genes required for regulating infection and related morphogenesis have been identified via the AtMT library. Here, we report the identification and characterization of MoPEX1, which putatively encodes peroxin 1 in M. oryzae. Our data shows that MoPEX1 is essential for infection-related morphogenesis and pathogenicity in the rice blast fungus.

Results

Identification of a non-pathogenic mutant C445

Recently, we performed AtMT in the M. oryzae wild-type strain Guy11 and obtained 2347 transformants. All the transformants were first screened by inoculation of 7-day-old barley leaves using a cut-leaf assay, and a non-pathogenic mutant C445 was identified (Fig. 1A,B). Consistently, the T-DNA insertional mutant C445 was unable to cause rice blast disease (Fig. 1B). To identify the T-DNA integration sites in the mutant C445, a 0.6-kb genomic DNA flanking the left side of the integration site was obtained by thermal asymmetric interlaced polymerase chain reaction (TAIL-PCR) amplification and sequenced (Fig. 1C). Bioinformatics analysis revealed that the T-DNA in C445 was integrated at position 4280958+ on supercontig 18 of chromosome I, 536 bp downstream of the predicted translational start site, in the second exon of MGG_09299 (Fig. 1D). MGG_09299 putatively encodes a protein homologous to peroxin 1 (Pex1), a protein functioning in peroxisome biosynthesis, and was thus termed as MoPEX1 in this work. MoPex1 shared 60%, 51%, and 38% amino acid identity with Pex1 homologs Fusarium graminearum FGSG_07104, Aspergillus nidulans ANIA_05991, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae YKL197C, respectively. MoPex1 is a member of the AAA-Type ATPase family. The AAA-domain comprises 200–250 amino acids and contains the Walker A and Walker B motifs, which bind and hydrolyze ATP, respectively (Fig. 1E).

Figure 1. Identification of the T-DNA targeted gene MoPEX1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(A) Colonies of the wild-type strain (Guy11) and the T-DNA insertional mutant (C445). Photographs were taken after incubating on complete medium (CM) at 25 °C for 10 days. (B) Barley (a) and rice (b) leaf segments were inoculated with mycelial plugs from Guy11 and C445, respectively. Photographs were taken at 5 days after inoculation. (C) Three round PCR amplifications of the genomic DNA flanking right site of the integration T-DNA in C445. (D) Position of the T-DNA insertion in C445 and the structure of the locus of the predicted gene MGG_09299. A red arrow indicates the T-DNA insertion position. The thick blue arrow represents the predicted exons. (E) MoPex1 contains two AAA-domains. Each domain contains a Walker A and a Walker B motifs, which bind and hydrolyze ATP, respectively.

MoPEX1 is essential for pathogenicity

To verify whether the phenotypes of C445 were truly caused by the insertion mutation, targeted deletion of MoPEX1 was carried out using the gene replacement vector pKO9299 (see Supplementary Fig. S1A). Four independent ΔMopex1 mutants (ΔMopex1-21, ΔMopex1-32, ΔMopex1-49, and ΔMopex1-57) were obtained from several transformation experiments. Southern blotting analysis confirmed that the correct gene replacement events had taken place in these mutants (see Supplementary Fig. S1B). The inactivation of transcription of MoPEX1 in the selected ΔMopex1 mutants (ΔMopex1-21 and ΔMopex1-57) was also indicated by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis (see Supplementary Fig. S1C). To further verify whether the phenotypes of the null mutants were caused by gene deletion, we conducted complementary analysis. The complemented transformant ΔMopex1-57C was obtained by transforming the genomic DNA, covering the full length MoPEX1 open reading frame (ORF) and a 2.0-kb promoter region, into the ΔMopex1 mutant (ΔMopex1-57).

To investigate the role of MoPEX1 in virulence, we carried out cut-leaf inoculation and spray-inoculation assays. Pathogenicity assays showed that both the wild-type strain and the complemented transformant caused typical rice blast lesions. Consistent with mutant C445, the ΔMopex1 mutants were nonpathogenic on rice leaves (Fig. 2A).

Figure 2. MoPEX1 is essential for pathogenicity.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) Spray-inoculation assays. Seedlings of rice were sprayed with 8 ml conidia suspension (5 × 104 conidia ml−1) of the wild-type strain (Guy11), two ΔMopex1 null mutants (ΔMopex1-21 and ΔMopex1-57) and the complemented strain (ΔMopex1-57C). (B) Conidia of each strain were inoculated onto rice leaf segments in the presence of 2.5% glucose solution at a concentration 1 × 105 conidia ml−1, 10 μl per drop. (C) Barley and rice segments were inoculated with the mycelia of the strains. a = unwounded leaf, b = abraded leaf. (D) Appressorium formation and infection hyphal development on onion and barley epidermal cells at 24 and 30 hours post inoculation (hpi). AP, appressorium; IH, infectious hypha. Bars = 20 μm. Disease lesions in (A,B,C) were examined and photographed at 5 days post inoculation.

Previously, it has been reported that peroxisomal fatty acid β-oxidation is vital for facilitating appressorium-mediated infection in M. oryzae25,26,27. One potential role for generated acetyl-CoA might be as a substrate for the glyoxylate cycle which feeds through reactions of the gluconeogenesis pathway to support glucan and chitin biosynthesis required for cell wall biosynthesis. Therefore, we performed rice pathogenicity assays using ΔMopex1 mutants in the presence of 2.5% glucose solution. The results showed that the ability to cause rice blast symptoms was partly restored to the ΔMopex1 mutants in the presence of glucose (Fig. 2B). It seems likely that addition of exogenous glucose to the ΔMopex1 mutants can partly restore the functional competence of appressoria in this fungus.

In addition, the ΔMopex1 mutants could form very limited lesions on abraded leaves (Fig. 2C), indicating cellular invasive growth was also impaired. Appressorium formation and infection hypha development were observed by dropping conidia suspensions of various strains on onion and barley epidermal cells. The ΔMopex1 mutants produced non-functional appressoria that failed to elaborate any penetration pegs or infection hyphae (Fig. 2D). The defects in appressorium-mediated penetration and pathogenicity were fully restored by reintroduction of MoPEX1 into the ΔMopex1-57 (Fig. 2). Thus, we conclude that MoPEX1 is essential for appressorium-mediated penetration and pathogenicity in M. oryzae.

MoPEX1 is required for conidiation

Deletion of MoPEX1 resulted in reduction of vegetative growth and conidiation. The ΔMopex1 mutants (ΔMopex1-21 and ΔMopex1-57) were significantly reduced in radial growth, forming colonies with diameters of 5.97 ± 0.06 cm and 5.83 ± 0.06 cm after 10-days incubation on complement medium (CM) at 25 °C, compared with 6.87 ± 0.08 cm diameter of the wild-type strain (see Supplementary Fig. S2A,B). By examining with an optical microscope, we observed that conidiophore differentiation and conidia production were severely impaired in the ΔMopex1 mutants (see Supplementary Fig. S2C). The ability to form asexual spores was further evaluated by carefully washing the surface of 10-day-old cultures of different strains. The ΔMopex1-21 and ΔMopex1-57 mutants produced 55.0 ± 8.66 × 104 and 70.0 ± 8.66 × 104 spores per plate, respectively, whereas the wild-type strain Guy11 produced 47.3 ± 0.65 × 106 spores per plate (see Supplementary Fig. S2D). The defects in colonial growth and conidiation were fully restored by reintroduction of the full-length ORF of MoPEX1 gene into the ΔMopex1 mutants (ΔMopex1-57C).

Moreover, we tested the sexual reproduction of the ΔMopex1 mutants on oatmeal agar (OMA) medium. After four weeks, numerous perithecia were observed at the junctions of the crosses, in both Guy11 × TH3 and ΔMopex1-57 × TH3 (see Supplementary Fig. S2E). These results indicated that MoPEX1 is not required for sexual reproduction by M. oryzae.

MoPEX1 is required for appressorium development

To determine whether deletion of MoPEX1 had an effect on appressorium formation, conidia from the ΔMopex1 mutants were allowed to germinate on a hydrophobic surface. After incubation for 24 h, we observed that appressoria of the ΔMopex1 mutants were abnormal under light microscopy compared to those of the wild-type strain (Fig. 3A). The appressorium formation rates of ΔMopex1-21 and ΔMopex1-57 were 58 ± 1% and 62 ± 1%, respectively, significantly lower than the rate of 96 ± 1% of the wild-type strain Guy11 (Fig. 3B). Even by 48 h, appressorium formation rates of the mutants were not significantly increased (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3. MoPEX1 is required for appressorium development by M. oryzae.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) The ΔMopex1 mutants (ΔMopex1-21 and ΔMopex1-57) formed less melanized appressoria on hydrophobic GelBond film surfaces at 24 hpi compared to the wild-type strain. Bars = 20 μm. (B) Appressorium formation rates at 24 and 48 hpi. (C,D) Cytorrhysis tests. Gradient concentrations of glycerol: 1, 2, 3, and 4 M (C); PEG8000: 25%, 30% and 35% (D). (E) Ultrastructural analysis of appressorium cell wall. Bars = 200 nm. (F) Expression levels of melanin biosynthesis-related genes. Means and standard deviations were calculated based on three independent experiments. Statistical difference is indicated by asterisks (P < 0.01).

Appressorium-mediated penetration depends on the enormous turgor generated in appressoria, which is used to breach the rice leaf cuticle. To determine whether deletion of MoPEX1 leads to alteration of appressorium turgor, we carried out cytorrhysis assays1. Conidia were allowed to form appressoria on the hydrophobic surface and then treated with different concentrations of glycerol. Surprisingly, a significant decrease in appressorial collapse was observed in the ΔMopex1 mutants compared to the wild-type strain Guy11 (Fig. 3C). We speculated that this phenomenon may be caused by the increased permeability of glycerol molecules in the mutants. Therefore, we performed a cytorrhysis assay using polyethylene glycol 8000 (PEG8000), which has larger molecular size than glycerol, in varying concentrations. As expected, more collapsed appressoria were observed in the ΔMopex1 mutants treated with PEG8000 compared to the wild-type strain Guy11 (Fig. 3D). These results suggested that glycerol, but not PEG8000, could cross the cell wall pores of the mutants. To determine whether MoPex1 is associated with regulation of cell wall integrity in M. oryzae, we exposed the ΔMopex1 mutants to agents associated with cell wall stress, including Congo Red (CR) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Compared to the wild-type Guy11, the mutants exhibited higher sensitivity to SDS and Congo red (see Supplementary Fig. S3), indicating that MoPEX1 plays an important role in the cell wall integrity. To further determine the alteration of melanization of cell walls, the factor related directly to the cell wall permeability, appressoria from the ΔMopex1 mutants were observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We found that the melanin layer of the ΔMopex1 mutants was thinner than that of the wild-type strain Guy11 (Fig. 3E). Consistently, quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis revealed that the expression levels of the genes ALB1, BUF1 and RSY1 involved in melanin synthesis were significantly reduced (Fig. 3F). These results suggested that MoPEX1 was involved in appressorial melanization and turgor generation in M. oryzae.

Taken together, we conclude that MoPEX1 is required for appressorium formation, morphology, and the cell wall integrity in M. oryzae.

Deletion of MoPEX1 blocks the import of peroxisome matrix proteins

Import of peroxisomal matrix proteins is dependent on the peroxisomal localization signal sequences: PTS1 and PTS2. To understand the roles of MoPEX1 in the import process of peroxisomal matrix proteins, green fluorescence protein (GFP) fused with a C-terminal consensus motif SKL (GFP-PTS1) and GFP containing an N-terminal PTS2 (PTS2-GFP)37 were introduced into the wild-type strain and the ΔMopex1-57 mutant, respectively. Four transformants (Guy11/GFP-PTS1, ΔMopex1/GFP-PTS1, Guy11/PTS2-GFP, and ΔMopex1/PTS2-GFP) consistent with the phenotypes of their parents, in which GFP-PTS1 or PTS2-GFP was expressed, were selected. Localization of GFP fluorescence was investigated in the conidia of each strain under a confocal microscope. When GFP-PTS1 or PTS2-GFP was expressed in the wild type, punctuate fluorescence was observed in conidia (Fig. 4), indicating that the GFP-PTS1 or PTS2-GFP is recognized correctly and transported into the peroxisomes. In contrast, the GFP fluorescence of the transformants derived from the ΔMopex1 mutant was dispersed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4), indicating that the ΔMopex1 mutant is defective in the import of peroxisome matrix proteins. These observations suggest that deletion of MoPEX1 blocks the import of peroxisome matrix proteins in M. oryzae.

Figure 4. Deletion of MoPEX1 blocked the PTS1 and PTS2 peroxisomal import pathways.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The wild-type strain Guy11 and the ΔMopex1-57 mutant were transformed with GFP-PTS1 and PTS2-GFP, respectively. Conidia from the transformants Guy11/GFP-PTS1, ΔMopex1/GFP-PTS1, Guy11/PTS2-GFP, ΔMopex1/PTS2-GFP were observed under a confocal fluorescence microscopy. Bars = 5 μm.

MoPex1 localizes to peroxisomes

In order to investigate the intracellular location of MoPex1, we performed expression analysis of the GFP-MoPex1 fusion protein. The eGFP:MoPEX1 plasmid, in which a 2.0-kb native promoter fragment and the entire MoPEX1 sequence were fused with eGFP, was constructed and then introduced into the ΔMopex1-57 mutant. The transformant NG9-3 showed similar phenotypes as the wild-type strain Guy11, suggesting that the GFP-MoPEX1 fusion gene was correctly expressed. After introducing the red fluorescence protein (RFP) construct RFP-PTS1 into the NG9-3 strain, the transformant GDW2 expressing both RFP-PTS1 and GFP-MoPEX1 was obtained. In the conidia of the GDW2 strain, GFP and RFP fluorescence showed a punctuate distribution largely at the same localization (Fig. 5A), indicating that MoPex1 localizes to peroxisomes. The temporal and spatial expression of MoPex1 was also investigated. We observed that a punctuate distribution during infection-related development including conidiation, appressorium formation, mycelial growth, and invasive growth at 30 hpi (Fig. 5B,C).

Figure 5. MoPex1 localizes to peroxisomes.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(A) Fluorescence of conidia from the co-transformant strain GDW2 expressing GFP-MoPEX1 and RFP-PTS1 was observed under a confocal microscopy. Bars = 10 μm. (B) MoPex1 expressed in the conidia, appressoria (incubated for 12 h) and vegetative hyphae. Bars = 10 μm. (C) The GFP-Mopex1 expression was observed in invasive hyphae at 30 hpi. Bars = 10 μm.

Mobilization and degradation of lipid droplets is delayed in ΔMopex1 mutants

To identify the role of MoPEX1 in lipid metabolism, Nile Red staining of intracellular lipid stores was carried out during appressorium morphogenesis of the ΔMopex1 mutant and the wild-type strain (Fig. 6). In the wild type, lipid droplets were scarcely observed in the conidium at 12 h and had been completely degraded at 24 h. However, larger lipid droplets were present in the conidium of the ΔMopex1 mutant at 24 h, indicating that mobilization of lipid droplets from conidia to appressoria was delayed in the ΔMopex1 mutant. Even at 48 h, lipid droplets were still present in the appressoria of the ΔMopex1 mutant and many lipid droplets still remained in the conidia (Fig. 6). These data suggested that translocation and degradation of lipid droplets were impaired by the deletion of MoPEX1.

Figure 6. Deletion of MoPEX1 delayed lipid mobilization and degradation during appressorium development in M. oryzae.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Conidia of the wild-type strain Guy11 and the ΔMopex1-57 mutant were incubated on the hydrophobic GelBond film surfaces and allowed to form appressoria. Samples at different time points (0, 2, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h) were stained with Nile Red and observed under a confocal microscopy. Bars = 10 μm.

MoPEX1 is required for fatty acid metabolism

In fungi, the peroxisomes are important organelles in which fatty acid β-oxidation occurs. In the Nile Red staining experiments, we observed more lipid droplets in the conidia and appressoria of the ΔMopex1-57 mutant than in those of the wild type. In order to clarify the effect of the deletion of MoPEX1 on fatty acid metabolism, vegetative growth on minimal medium (MM) with glucose (1%), sodium acetate (50 mM), olive oil (0.2%), or Tween-20 (0.5%) as the sole carbon source was assessed. After incubation for 10 days, the growth reduction rate of the ΔMopex1-57 mutant grown with sodium acetate was 8.8%, lower than the rate of 18.6% of the ΔMopex1-57 mutant grown with glucose. However, the growth of the ΔMopex1-57 mutant was significantly inhibited on the medium supplemented with olive oil or Tween-20 (Fig. 7A,B). The reduction rates of the ΔMopex1-57 mutant under olive oil or Tween-20 reached 25.1% and 65.6%, respectively. Similar results were obtained for the ΔMopex1-21 mutants under these conditions.

Figure 7. Deletion of MoPEX1 affects lipid utilization.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Lipid utilization by the wild-type strain Guy11 and the ΔMopex1-57 mutant. The strains were cultured on minimal media with glucose (1%), sodium acetate (50 mM), olive oil (0.2%) or Tween-20 (0.5%) as the sole carbon source for 10 days. (B) Growth reduction rates of colony growth on different media. (C) The wild-type strain Guy11 and the ΔMopex1-57 mutant were inoculated in liquid minimal media with different carbon sources as the sole carbon source at 28 °C for 5 days. Means and standard deviations were calculated based on three independent experiments. Statistical difference is indicated by asterisks (P < 0.01).

We further examined the dry weight of the mycelia obtained from Guy11 and the ΔMopex1 mutants by incubating them in liquid MM with glucose, sodium acetate, olive oil, or Tween-20 as the sole carbon source. After 5 days at 28 °C, there was no obvious difference in weight when grown on glucose and acetate. In contrast, the dry weight of the ΔMopex1 mutants was significantly reduced when grown under olive oil or Tween-20 as the sole carbon source (Fig. 7C), compared to Guy11, indicating that the ΔMopex1 mutants are defective in the utilization of fatty acids. Taken together, these results suggested that MoPEX1 is required for fatty acid metabolism in M. oryzae.

MoPex1 physically interacts with MoPex6

In Pichia pastoris, it has been first reported that Pex1 interacts with Pex638 and the interaction of Pex1 and Pex6 was confirmed in Homo sapiens39, Hansenula polymorpha40, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae41. To determine whether MoPex1 interacts with MoPex6 in M. oryzae, we carried out yeast two hybrid (Y2H) experiments. The cDNA of MoPEX1 was cloned into pGADT7 as the prey vector pGADT7-PEX1. The cDNA of MoPEX6 was cloned into pGBKT7 as the bait vector pGBKT7-PEX6. The resulting prey and bait vectors were co-transformed into the yeast strain AH109. The Leu+ and Trp+ yeast transformants were isolated and assayed for growth on SD/–Trp/–Leu/–His/–Ade medium. The results provided evidence that MoPex1 physically interacts with MoPex6 (Fig. 8).

Figure 8. MoPex1 interacts with MoPex6.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

The vectors pGBKT7/pGADT7 (negative control), pGBKT7-53/pGADT7-T (positive control), pGAD-Pex1/pGBKT7, pGBK-Pex6/pGADT7, pGAD-Pex1/pGBK-Pex6 were co-transformed to the yeast strain AH109, respectively. The Leu+ and Trp+ yeast transformants were assayed for growth on SD/–Trp/–Leu/–His/–Ade medium at specified concentrations 1 × 105, 1 × 104, 1 × 103, and 1 × 102 cells per 10 μl droplet.

Discussion

M. oryzae can mechanically breach the rice leaf surface using enormous turgor generated in appressoria by accumulating osmolytes such as glycerol1,2,3. The degradation of lipids during appressorium formation is an efficient means of rapidly producing glycerol and also leads to production of fatty acids for β-oxidation35, which is the principal means by which fatty acids are degraded. Previous studies have provided the evidence that either peroxisome biosynthesis or fatty acid β-oxidation is a prerequisite for appressorium-mediated plant infection in M. oryzae25,26. In this study, we identified and characterized MoPEX1, homologous to PEX1 in yeast, which is important for peroxisomal matrix protein import and the degradation of the lipid body. Although Pex1 orthologs are well conserved in filamentous ascomycetes, but, to our knowledge, none of them has been functionally characterized previously. In this study, our data showed that ΔMopex1 mutants were defective in infection-related morphogenesis and were nonpathogenic. We found that appressoria produced by the mutants were non-functional and unable to penetrate plant cuticle. Moreover, under light microscopy and TEM, appressoria of the ΔMopex1 mutants were found to be abnormal and less pigmented compared to those of the wild-type strain. Therefore, MoPEX1 is essential for appressorium-mediated penetration and pathogenicity in M. oryzae.

Deletion of MoPEX1 may impair peroxisome synthesis and fatty acid β-oxidation, as well as causing reduced acetyl CoA production. There are three possible aspects that determine plant infection behavior of the ΔMopex1 mutants. First, acetyl CoA may not be available for glyoxylate cycle and gluconeogenesis to provide glucan and chitin biosynthesis, which are required for cell wall generation4. This point is supported by the evidence that addition of exogenous glucose to appressoria of ΔMopex1 mutants partially restored their ability to cause disease (Fig. 2B). Second, deficiency of acetyl CoA may affect appressorium turgor generation in the ΔMopex1 mutants (Fig. 3C,D), because acetyl CoA from fatty acid β-oxidation can provide precursors for glycerol production through the glyoxylate cycle and gluconeogenesis. Third, lower level of the resulting acetyl CoA from β-oxidation may affect melanin biosynthesis via the dihydroxynaphthalene pathway. Appressorium melanization is essential for plant infection by M. oryzae1,2,4,42. In the ΔMopex1 mutants, appressoria showed a thinner melanin layer and the expression levels of melanin biosynthesis-related genes were significantly reduced (Fig. 3EF).

Taken together, these deficiencies caused by low levels of acetyl CoA may lead to the loss of pathogenicity in the ΔMopex1 mutants. We also noted that the ΔMopex1 mutants formed very limited lesions on wounded rice leaves compared to the wild-type strain (Fig. 2C). Therefore, MoPEX1 is important not only for initial infection but also for tissue colonization in M. oryzae.

Peroxisome matrix proteins are translocated to peroxisomes by targeting signals (PTS1 or PTS2). Analysis by GFP-PTS1 expression indicated that the PTS1-containing matrix protein import was blocked in the ΔClpex6 mutants in C. Lagenarium24. In M. oryzae, MoPEX5 and MoPEX6 had been identified to participate in PTS1 matrix protein import26,29. MoPEX7 contributes to the import of PTS2 matrix proteins30. Recently, it has been reported that the imports of PTS1- and PTS2-containing matrix proteins were impaired in the ΔMopex19 mutants31. In this study, we compared the distribution of GFP-PTS1 and PTS2-GFP in the wild-type strain and ΔMopex1 mutants. In the cells of the ΔMopex1 mutants expressing GFP-PTS1 and PTS2-GFP, diffuse fluorescence was observed throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 4). This indicated that MoPEX1, like MoPEX5, 6, 7, and 19, plays an important role in peroxisome matrix protein import in M. oryzae.

Moreover, we also transformed GFP-PMP47, a fusion representing the integral peroxisomal membrane proteins31, into the wild-type strain and ΔMopex1 mutants. Although the florescence was generally in punctate pattern, diffuse florescence could be detected in the conidia of the ΔMopex1/GFP-PMP47, in contrast to the absolute punctate pattern in the wild type. We also noted that the punctate GFP fluorescence in the hyphae was seemingly bigger compared to the wild type/GFP-PMP47 (see Supplementary Fig. S4). These results imply that peroxisome membrane protein import was also partially affected by the deletion of MoPEX1.

Degradation of lipid droplets is catalyzed by triacylglycerol lipase, producing glycerol and fatty acids for β-oxidation. Peroxisomes are important organelles wherein β-oxidation occurs. In C. lagenarium, the deficiency of peroxisomal function in the ΔClpex6 mutants leads to its inability to utilize long-chain fatty acids24,25. In M. oryzae, the peroxisome-related mutants, ΔMopex5, ΔMopex6, and ΔMopex7, were unable to utilize long-chain fatty acids as sole carbon sources and ΔMopex19 mutants showed severe growth reduction when cultured with long-chain fatty acids26,29,30,31. Moreover, yeast cells deficient in Pex1 also show a characteristic phenotype with the inability to grow on oleic acid as sole carbon source43,44. Similar to these pex mutants, ΔMopex1 mutants were also defective in lipid utilization, while the glucose and acetate utilization was unaffected in the ΔMopex1 mutants. In addition, the translocation and degradation of lipid droplets were impaired by the deletion of MoPEX1. This indicates that MoPEX1 plays an important role in fatty acids metabolism.

In yeasts, Pex1 interacts with Pex6 to form a complex that participates in Pex5 recycling45,46. Yeast two hybrid experiments (Fig. 8) indicated that MoPex1 physically interacts with MoPex6. Furthermore, the expression level of MoPEX6 in ΔMopex1 mutants were analysed by qRT-PCR. The results exhibited that the expression level of MoPEX6 in mycelia and appressoria of the ΔMopex1 mutant was up-regulated (see Supplementary Fig. S5). However, the exact relationship between MoPEX1 and MoPEX6 or other peroxisome genes will be explored in future.

Materials and Methods

Strains, growth conditions, and nucleic acid manipulation

All mutants described in this study were generated from M. oryzae wild-type strain Guy11. Standard growth and storage procedures for fungal strains were performed, as described previously47. Agrobacterium tumefaciens AGL1 was used for T-DNA insertional transformation. Escherichia coli strain DH-5α was used for routine bacterial transformations and maintenance of various plasmids in this study. All the strains used in this study were listed in Supplementary Table S1. Genomic DNAs were extracted from vegetative hyphae using the cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol48. Southern blot analysis was performed by the digoxigenin (DIG) high prime DNA labeling and Detection starter Kit II (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). General procedures for nucleic acid analysis followed standard protocols49.

Fungal growth, sporulation, and appressorium formation

Vegetative growth was assessed by measurement of colony diameter in plate cultures of M. oryzae grown on CM medium at 25 °C for 10 days. Conidial development was assessed by harvesting conidia from the surface of 10-day-old plate cultures and determining the concentration of the resulting conidial suspension using a haemocytometer (Corning). Appressorium formation was measured on hydrophobic coverslips at 25 °C for 24 h and 48 h. The percentage of appressorium formation was determined by microscopic examination of at least 100 conidia or appressoria. Each test was repeated at least three times.

Pathogenicity assay

Two-week-old seedlings of the rice cultivar ‘CO39’ and 7-day-old seedlings of the barley cultivar ‘Golden Promise’ were used for infection assays. For cut-leaf assays, the mycelial plugs from 10-day-old CM cultures were placed onto the leaf surface and placed in plastic plates containing wet filters. Wounded leaves were prepared by removing the surface cuticle by abrasion with an emery board, as described previously26. For spray-inoculation assays, conidial suspensions with a concentration of 5 × 104 conidia ml−1, diluted in 0.05% Tween-20, were spray-inoculated onto plant leaves. For inoculation of onion and barley epidermis surfaces in vitro, conidia from 10-day-old CM cultures were carefully inoculated on onion and barley epidermis surfaces with 1 × 105 conidia ml−1 and incubated at 25 °C in the dark.

Construction of vectors and fungal transformation

For generating the MoPEX1 gene replacement vector pKO9299, the 1.5-kb upstream and 1.5-kb downstream sequences of MoPEX1 were amplified with primer pairs LB F/ LB R and RB F/ RB R, respectively. The PCR products were cloned into pKOV21 vector to generate pKO9299. Then, pKO9299 was transformed into Guy11 for generating homologous recombinants.

For construction of the complementation vector (N-terminal GFP tagging vector) pGFP-MoPEX1, a 2.0-kb native promoter region and 3.8-kb full length region of the MoPEX1 gene were amplified with primer pairs 9299nGFP F/promGFP R and 9299cGFP F/9299GFP R, respectively. The 0.7-kb eGFP coding sequence was amplified with primer pairs GFP F/GFP R. Three PCR products were cloned into pCB1532 to create pNG9299, according to the manufacturer’s instructions of One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The resulting plasmid was transformed into the ΔMopex1 mutant (ΔMopex1-57).

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis and TEM

Total RNA was extracted using PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, USA) from mycelia cultured in liquid CM for 2 days or from appressoria formed on barley epidermis for 24 h. Synthesis of the first strand complementary DNA (cDNA) and qRT-PCR were performed as described previously50. The relative expression level of each gene was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method51. β-tubulin (MGG_00604) was used as an endogenous reference. All the primers used for qRT-PCR assays are listed in Supplementary Table S2. Means and standard deviations were calculated based on three independent experiments. Appressoria formed on sterile onion epidermis for 24 h were processed for TEM52.

Mobilization of lipid droplets during appressorium development

Conidia of tested M. oryzae strains were harvested from the surface of 10-day-old plate cultures. Conidial suspensions with a concentration of 5 × 104 conidia ml−1 were incubated on hydrophobic GelBond and incubated at 25 °C. Lipid droplets in the germinating conidia, germ tubes, and appressoria of Guy11 and the ΔMopex1 mutants were visualized by staining with Nile Red solution consisting 50 mM Tris-maleate buffer (pH 7.5), 20 mg ml−1 polyvinylpyrrolidone and 2.5 μg ml−1 Nile Red Oxazone35,53. Microscopy was performed using a Zeiss Lsm 780 inverted confocal laser scanning microscope at intervals.

Y2H assay

Y2H assay was carried out according to the instructions of BD Matchmaker Library Construction & Screening Kits (Clontech, PaloAlto, CA, U.S.A.). The full-length cDNAs of MoPEX1 and MoPEX6 were amplified with the primer pairs 9299 AD F/9299 AD R and PEX6 BK F/PEX6 BK R, respectively. The cDNA of MoPEX1 was cloned into pGADT7 as the prey vector pGADT7-PEX1. The cDNA of MoPEX6 was cloned into pGBKT7 as the bait vector pGBKT7-PEX6. The resulting pGADT7-MoPEX1 and each bait vector were co-transformed into yeast strain AH109. The resulting bait vector and empty prey vector were also co-transformed into yeast strain AH109. The Leu+ and Trp+ yeast transformants were isolated and assayed for growth on SD/–Trp/–Leu/–His/–Ade medium. Yeast strains for positive and negative controls were from the Kit.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Deng, S. et al. Identification and characterization of the peroxin 1 gene MoPEX1 required for infection-related morphogenesis and pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae. Sci. Rep. 6, 36292; doi: 10.1038/srep36292 (2016).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep36292-s1.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Youliang Peng of China Agricultural University for providing plasmid KOV21. This work was supported by National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China (2012CB114002) and the Natural Science Foundation of China to ZYW (Grant Nos 31370172 and 31570135) and JYW (Grant No. 31470249).

Footnotes

Author Contributions S.D., J.W., Z.W. and G.S. conceived and designed the experiments. S.D., Z.G., N.Y., L.L., X.Y. and Y.Q. performed the experiments. S.D., J.W. and Z.W. analyzed the data. S.D., J.W. and Z.W. wrote the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Howard R. J., Ferrari M. A., Roach D. H. & Money N. P. Penetration of hard substrates by a fungus employing enormous turgor pressures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88, 11281–11284 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. de Jong J. C., McCormack B. J., Smirnoff N. & Talbot N. J. Glycerol generates turgor in rice blast. Nature 389, 244–245 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  3. Talbot N. J. On the trail of a cereal killer: exploring the biology of Magnaporthe grisea. Annu Rev Microbiol. 57, 177–202 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Howard R. J. & Valent B. Breaking and entering: host penetration by the fungal rice blast pathogen Magnaporthe grisea. Annu Rev Microbiol. 50, 491–512 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hazeu W., Batenburg-Van der Vegte W. H. & Nieuwdorp P. J. The fine structure of microbodies in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Experientia. 31, 926–927 (1975). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McCollum D., Monosov E. & Subramani S. The pas8 mutant of Pichia pastoris exhibits the peroxisomal protein import deficiencies of Zellweger syndrome cells–the PAS8 protein binds to the COOH-terminal tripeptide peroxisomal targeting signal, and is a member of the TPR protein family. J Cell Biol. 121, 761–774 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gould S. J., McCollum D., Spong A. P., Heyman J. A. & Subramani S. Development of the yeast Pichia pastoris as a model organism for a genetic and molecular analysis of peroxisome assembly. Yeast. 8, 613–628 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Subramani S. Protein import into peroxisomes and biogenesis of the organelle. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 9, 445–478 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. van der Klei I. J. & Veenhuis M. Yeast and filamentous fungi as model organisms in microbody research. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1763, 1364–1373 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hu J. et al. Plant peroxisomes: biogenesis and function. Plant Cell 24, 2279–2303 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hajra A. K. & Bishop J. E. Glycerolipid biosynthesis in peroxisomes via the acyl dihydroxyacetone phosphate pathway. Ann NY Acad Sci. 386, 170–182 (1982). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nagan N. & Zoeller R. A. Plasmalogens: biosynthesis and functions. Prog Lipid Res. 40, 199–229 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Krisans S. K. The role of peroxisomes in cholesterol metabolism. Am J Resp Cell Mol. 7, 358–364 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Biardi L. & Krisans S. K. Compartmentalization of cholesterol biosynthesis. Conversion of mevalonate to farnesyl diphosphate occurs in the peroxisomes. J Biol Chem. 271, 1784–1788 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wanders R. J. & Waterham H. R. Biochemistry of mammalian peroxisomes revisited. Annu Rev Biochem. 75, 295–332 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Titorenko V. I. & Rachubinski R. A. The life cycle of the peroxisome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2, 357–368 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Imanaka T., Shiina Y., Takano T., Hashimoto T. & Osumi T. Insertion of the 70 kDa peroxisomal membrane protein into peroxisomal membranes in vivo and in vitro. J Biol Chem. 271, 3706–3713 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Diestelkötter P. & Just W. W. In vitro insertion of the 22-kD peroxisomal membrane protein into isolated rat liver peroxisomes. J Cell Biol. 123, 1717–1725 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Just W. W. & Diestelkötter P. Protein insertion into the peroxisomal membrane. Ann NY Acad Sci. 804, 60–75 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Subramani S., Koller A. & Snyder W. B. Import of peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 69, 399–418 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fujiki Y. Peroxisome biogenesis and peroxisome biogenesis disorders. FEBS Lett. 476, 42–46 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hettema E. H., Distel B. & Tabak H. F. Import of proteins into peroxisomes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1451, 17–34 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Distel B. et al. A unified nomenclature for peroxisome biogenesis factors. J Cell Biol. 135, 1–3 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kimura A., Takano Y., Furusawa I. & Okuno T. Peroxisomal metabolic function is required for appressorium-mediated plant infection by Colletotrichum lagenarium. Plant Cell 13, 1945–1957 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ramos-Pamplona M. & Naqvi N. I. Host invasion during rice-blast disease requires carnitine-dependent transport of peroxisomal acetyl-CoA. Mol Microbiol. 61, 61–75 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang Z. Y., Soanes D. M., Kershaw M. J. & Talbot N. J. Functional analysis of lipid metabolism in Magnaporthe grisea reveals a requirement for peroxisomal fatty acid β-oxidation during appressorium-mediated plant infection. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 20, 475–491 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bhambra G. K., Wang Z. Y., Soanes D. M., Wakley G. E. & Talbot N. J. Peroxisomal carnitine acetyl transferase is required for elaboration of penetration hyphae during plant infection by Magnaporthe grisea. Mol Microbiol. 61, 46–60 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Solomon P. S., Lee R. C., Wilson T. J. & Oliver R. P. Pathogenicity of Stagonospora nodorum requires malate synthase. Mol Microbiol. 53, 1065–1073 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Goh J. et al. The PEX7-mediated peroxisomal import system is required for fungal development and pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS One 6, e28220 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang J. Y. et al. PTS1 peroxisomal import pathway plays shared and distinct roles to PTS2 pathway in development and pathogenicity of Magnaporthe oryzae. PloS One 8, e55554 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Li L. et al. MoPex19, which is essential for maintenance of peroxisomal structure and woronin bodies, is required for metabolism and development in the rice blast fungus. PloS One 9, e85252 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Poirier Y., Antonenkov V. D., Glumoff T. & Hiltunen J. K. Peroxisomal β-oxidation-a metabolic pathway with multiple functions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1763, 1413–1426 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hiltunen J. K. et al. The biochemistry of peroxisomal β-oxidation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 27, 35–64 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Maggio-Hall L. A. & Keller N. P. Mitochondrial β-oxidation in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Microbiol. 54, 1173–1185 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Thines E., Weber R. W. & Talbot N. J. MAP kinase and protein kinase A-dependent mobilization of triacylglycerol and glycogen during appressorium turgor generation by Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell 12, 1703–1718 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Weber R. W. S., Wakley G. E., Thines E. & Talbot N. J. The vacuole as central element of the lytic system and sink for lipid droplets in maturing appressoria of Magnaporthe grisea. Protoplasma. 216, 101–112 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang J. Y. et al. Fluorescent co-localization of PTS1 and PTS2 and its application in analysis of the gene function and the peroxisomal dynamic in Magnaporthe oryzae. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 9, 802–810 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Faber K. N., Heyman J. A. & Subramani S. Two AAA family peroxins, PpPex1p and PpPex6p, interact with each other in an ATP-dependent manner and are associated with different subcellular membranous structures distinct from peroxisomes. Mol Cell Biol. 18, 936–943 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tamura S. et al. A cytoplasmic AAA family peroxin, Pex1p, interacts with Pex6p. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 245, 883–886 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kiel J. A. et al. Hansenula polymorpha Pex1p and Pex6p are peroxisome-associated AAA proteins that functionally and physically interact. Yeast. 15, 1059–1078 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Birschmann I., Rosenkranz K., Erdmann R. & Kunau W. H. Structural and functional analysis of the interaction of the AAA-peroxins Pex1p and Pex6p. FEBS J. 272, 47–58 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Money N. P. & Howard R. J. Confirmation of a link between fungal pigmentation, turgor pressure, and pathogenicity using a new method of turgor measurement. Fungal Genet Biol. 20, 217–227 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  43. Krause T., Kunau W-H. & Erdmann R. Effect of site-directed mutagenesis of conserved lysine residues upon Pas1 protein function in peroxisome biogenesis. Yeast. 10, 1613–1620 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Heyman J. A., Monosov E. & Subramani S. Role of the PAS1 gene of Pichia pastoris in peroxisome biogenesis. J Cell Biol. 127, 1259–1273 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Collins C. S., Kalish J. E., Morrell J. C., McCaffery J. M. & Gould S. J. The peroxisome biogenesis factors Pex4p, Pex22p, Pex1p, and Pex6p act in the terminal steps of peroxisomal matrix protein import. Mol Cell Biol. 20, 7516–7526 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Platta H. W., Grunau S., Rosenkranz K., Girzalsky W. & Erdmann R. Functional role of the AAA peroxins in dislocation of the cycling PTS1 receptor back to the cytosol. Nat Cell Biol. 7, 817–822 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Talbot N. J., Ebbole D. J. & Hamer J. E. Identification and characterization of MPG1, a gene involved in pathogenicity from the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell 5, 1575–1590 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Xu J. R. & Hamer J. E. MAP kinase and cAMP signaling regulate infection structure formation and pathogenic growth in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Genes Dev. 10, 2696–2706 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sambrook J., Fritsch E. F. & Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1989).
  50. Yue X. F. et al. ZNF1 encodes a putative C2H2 zinc finger protein essential for appressorium differentiation by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 29, 22–35 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. LivaK K. J. & Schmittgen T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitive PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Soundararajan S. et al. Woronin body function in Magnaporthe grisea is essential for efficient pathogenesis and for survival during nitrogen starvation stress. Plant Cell 16, 1564–1574 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Weber R. W., Wakley G. E. & Pitt D. Histochemical and ultrastructural characterization of vacuoles and spherosomes as components of the lytic system in hyphae of the fungus Botrytis cinerea. Histochem J. 31, 293–301 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep36292-s1.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES