Skip to main content
Urology Annals logoLink to Urology Annals
. 2016 Oct-Dec;8(4):444–448. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.192111

Presentation and prognosis of female acute urinary retention: Analysis of an unusual clinical condition in outpatients

Bora Özveren 1,, Selçuk Keskin 1
PMCID: PMC5100150  PMID: 28057989

Abstract

Objectives:

Acute urinary retention (AUR) in females is a poorly defined condition with undetermined epidemiology. This study aimed to evaluate female AUR in an outpatient population.

Patients and Methods:

One hundred and thirty-eight adult female outpatients who presented to the emergency room with symptoms of urinary retention were retrospectively analyzed. The women who were ultimately diagnosed with true, complete AUR were systematically reviewed for clinical characteristics and management.

Results:

In this outpatient cohort with urinary retention complaints, only 23% of the patients were diagnosed with objective AUR. Detailed medical and urological history in addition to urogenital, neurological, and pelvic examinations was essential; urine analysis and pelvic ultrasonography were necessary as baseline investigations. Further radiological and urodynamic tests were required in a minority. Specific etiology was established in 77% of the patients, whereas there was more than one probable cause in 16% of the patients, and no specific cause was found in 6.5% of the patients. Bladder decompression and correction of the underlying cause helped 92.6% of the reviewed patients to eventually achieve spontaneous micturition.

Conclusions:

The proportion of true, complete AUR among female outpatients presenting to the emergency department was 23% following urological evaluation. Acute condition was resolved by urgent catheterization in all, and the majority of women had eventually resumed spontaneous voiding.

Key Words: Acute urinary retention, female, urethral catheterization, voiding dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

The epidemiology and clinical features of acute urinary retention (AUR) in females have not been well documented. A former study has estimated that female AUR occurs 1 in 100,000 every year, and female-to-male incidence rate is 1:13.[1] There is another study that is frequently cited reports on the incidence of AUR as 0.07/1000 inhabitants per year, with half of the cases occurring after surgery or parturition.[2] The etiology of acute disability to empty the bladder is multifactorial including anatomic or functional bladder outlet obstruction and bladder dysfunction. In females, however, urinary retention is a more complex issue than its counterpart in males. The obstructive complaints may be associated with a myriad of conditions such as infections, overactive bladder, chronic retention, dehydration, or even psychological conditions.[4] The condition is empirically regarded as transient and may easily be attributed to a particular triggering cause such as in cases of postpartum or postoperative retention.[3,4] On the other hand, the complaints of some women suggesting “urinary retention” may not necessarily indicate true, complete AUR such as in mimicking cases of urinary infections, lower ureter stones, and dehydration. The International Continence Society (ICS) defines AUR as “a painful, palpable, or percussible bladder, when the patient is unable to pass any urine.”[5]

Literature on the evaluation of symptomatic female AUR in an emergency outpatient setting is lacking. Most studies mention AUR after anti-incontinence surgeries or at early postpartum period.[1,2] Our investigation focuses on the female outpatient population and acute presentation with urinary retention. We aimed to investigate the etiological factors, clinical characteristics, diagnostic assessment, and management of female patients who presented to the emergency clinic with complaints of inability to urinate and referred to urology department for the evaluation of AUR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The electronic records of adult female patients who presented to the emergency department with the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision-coded diagnoses of “R33 - retention of urine” or “R39.1 - other difficulties with micturition” from 2000 to 2015 were reviewed in this retrospective descriptive study. Ethical approval was attained from the Local Institutional Committee with assurance of confidentiality of the data. All female outpatients who presented to the emergency room with symptoms of urinary retention and consulted by a urology specialist were included in this analysis. The patients complaining of “urinary retention” but whose symptoms or findings did not meet the requirements of clinical AUR were excluded from this analysis. Those who were finally diagnosed with AUR and therefore needed urgent catheterization were systematically chart-reviewed for the clinical characteristics, diagnostic and treatment procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 138 referred patients were assessed for urgent complaints of “inability to urinate or empty the bladder and suprapubic/lower abdominal pain or fullness” following initial assessment in the emergency room. Differential diagnostic evaluation determined that 107 patients did not meet the criteria for complete AUR. Even though these patients had some form of acute micturition difficulty, they did not have a high volume of retained urine or absolute inability to void. A diagnosis of AUR was reached by physical findings and radiological demonstration of residual urine. Retention of urine was verified either by abdominal ultrasonography or BladderScan® measurement.

The mean age of women was 54 (range 25–94). There were nine patients over the age of 65, whereas 11 were younger than 40 years.

Detailed urological evaluation and radiological investigations consequently confirmed AUR in 31 patients (23%) of all presented to the emergency room with subjective inability to void. These cases comprised seven patients in their early postoperative period (two orthopedic surgeries, one abdominoplasty, and four anti-incontinence operations). In addition, there were two postpartum women who visited the emergency room for urinary retention. Table 1 displays data of the remaining 22 cases of complete AUR (postoperative and postpartum cases are omitted). In all, specific etiology could not be distinguished in two patients (6.5%). Apparently, there was more than one probable cause in five (16%) patients.

Table 1.

Clinical data of patients with acute urinary retention, excluding postoperative, and postpartum patients

graphic file with name UA-8-444-g001.jpg

Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were the most frequent diseases encountered in medical history of the patients. Nine (40.9%) had a diagnosis of hypertension, including four having diabetes as well. Among patients with a history of diabetes, only 1 [number 21 in Table 1] had uncontrolled hyperglycemia at the time of AUR diagnosis. Medical history was not remarkable in 12 (54.6%) women.

All AUR patients, except two, were initially managed by urethral catheterization. The exceptions were one patient (cauda equina syndrome [CES] due to thoracic spinal arteriovenous malformation) who refused catheterization and another (urethral meatal stenosis) who required urethral dilatation before catheterization. Six patients (one pelvic organ prolapse, one uterine neoplasm, one idiopathic, and three postoperative) were managed by single intermittent catheterization. In addition, two patients (one pregnancy and one genital herpes simplex virus infection) agreed to drain the bladder by regular self-clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) after initial decompression. Twenty-three patients (74.2%) were catheterized for at least 1 day (range 1–14 days). Of these, four patients were discharged with their catheter, but the information on their catheterization interval could not be retrieved from the electronic records.

The average volume of urine drained by immediate catheterization was 746 ml (range 220–2000, median 600 ml). Among all patients who were unable to void spontaneously, nine patients had drained volumes of <500 ml.

Urodynamic studies were conducted in four women (12.9%). Those patients were two with CES, one with large ovarian neoplasm who had 1000 residual urine, and one with ischium-pubis fracture who later had recurrent AUR episodes and catheterizations. Cystometric studies revealed large (>600 ml) capacity, over-compliant, and hypocontractile with reduced or absent sensation bladders in three women while the patient with ischium-pubis fracture had a 370 ml capacity bladder with decreased compliance and terminal detrusor overactivity. One young patient [number 14 in Table 1] refused further urodynamic investigation when resumed voiding spontaneously following 1 day-long catheterization. The clinical presentation of this patient was suggestive of Fowler's Syndrome, however the diagnosis remained undefined due to lack of cystometric and sphincter electromyogram (EMG) studies.

The prognosis of micturition was ascertained from patient records in 27 women. Four patients were lost to follow-up. One patient who had a diagnosis of CES due to herniated lumbar disc continued with self-CIC after surgery. One patient, an 82-year-old woman with Grade 35 pelvic organ prolapse, refused definitive treatment by surgery. Her later records revealed that she was followed up with a diagnosis of chronic retention and urinary incontinence. In total, 92.6% (25/27) of the female AUR patients achieved spontaneous micturition following specific treatment or catheter removal.

DISCUSSION

The current investigation attempted to elucidate “true” AUR among female outpatients presenting to the emergency clinic with symptoms of inability to void. In this cohort of women with urgent complaints suggesting urinary retention, we observed that only 23% were diagnosed with objective AUR after urological evaluation. While the emergency medical condition was taken care by immediate urethral catheterization, majority of them ultimately achieved spontaneous micturition.

Female AUR is an uncommon clinical condition which is usually transient and also clinically ill-defined in some cases. A patient-observed situation of “inability to pass urine” may not necessarily indicate a clinically defined “acute retention.” As the diagnostic criteria by ICS proposes, painful or palpably distended bladder may not aid in differential diagnosis of AUR in females.[5,6] ICS comments that “the retention volume in AUR should be significantly greater than the expected normal bladder capacity.” Yet, it is unclear whether this refers to a functional, cystometric, or anatomic capacity.[7,8] Ramsey and Palmer define AUR as an inability to void, with a retained urine volume of 200 ml or greater.[9] The data of drained urine volumes are usually not reported in similar studies. Our results show that women may seek urgent medical attention for sudden and complete inability to void with retained urine volumes lower than expected bladder capacities as well. Especially, if the underlying pathology is an outlet obstruction, a clinical diagnosis of AUR is justified despite low volumes of retained urine. On the other hand, we did not observe any adverse impact of a high volume of catheterized urine on the clinical prognosis of patients.

Temporary postoperative urinary retention is a common event. Its incidence in hospitalized women is lower as compared to men (2.9% vs. 4.7%).[10] Estimates of urinary retention rates after incontinence and prolapse surgery range from 2.5 to 24%.[11] Postpartum retention occurs in a range of 0.1–14.1% after vaginal delivery and up to 24.1% after cesarean delivery.[12,13,14] We observed that postoperative and postpartum patients may still be prone to AUR following discharge. The therapeutic approach to such emergencies is straightforward and usually does not necessitate further diagnostic evaluations.

Our results confirm the previous findings that cardiovascular disorders and diabetes mellitus are the most common medical conditions associated to urinary retention.[15,16] Urine analysis appeared as the most useful laboratory test. Although infection of the urinary tract has been reported among underlying factors for urinary retention, its role as a cause or a concurrence in AUR remains uncertain. Thorough abdominopelvic examination and ultrasonography of the pelvis remained as the most valuable tools for elucidating etiology in our analysis. Genital dermatological examination was decisive for detecting rare causes such as herpes simplex or zoster infection.

When evaluating AUR, invasive diagnostic tests may be deferred if evident and transient causes are present. Urodynamic studies and sphincter EMG are reserved for persistent, recurrent, or unexplained cases. Based on a previous evidence, the underlying disorder in female AUR is usually detrusor failure rather than outflow obstruction.[17,18,19] Painless, acute retention of high volumes of urine is likely to be associated with neurogenic bladder.[20,21] It is worth mentioning that physicians encountering acute neurologic conditions should be aware that urinary retention from neurologic causes occurs equally in men and women.[22]

The literature on female AUR involves inpatient data. A retrospective review reported the most common etiologies as urethral stenosis, urinary tract infection, nonurological postoperative retention, and clot retention, whereas no etiology was found in a third.[23] Another report on inpatient database revealed the most common causes of AUR in women as malignancy (36%) and neuropathic bladder dysfunction (16%).[24] García-Fadrique et al. studied 202 women referred to their Neurourology and Urodynamics Unit after an AUR episode and stated the most frequent causes as neurological (26%) and unknown (23%).[25] Our cohort of outpatients comprises a distinct study group in comparison to other reports. The current findings, therefore, represent unique information on the prevalence and presentation of this urological condition in emergency medical practice.

Prognosis of female AUR is rarely disclosed in previous studies. In general, timely removal of the offending cause or addressing the underlying disorder restores normal bladder function. However, neurogenic causes and conditions affecting the primary detrusor function may pose difficulties in management. In our study group, 92.6% of the patients ultimately achieved spontaneous micturition after a diagnosis of AUR.

The main limitations of this study are the small number of patients and retrospective method of investigation. Nevertheless, the uncommonness of female AUR makes it difficult to design a prospective study in an outpatient population. While the present study focuses uniquely on outpatient data, it would still be injudicious to estimate a prevalence from our data because there might have been cases of AUR that had not been referred to the urology clinic. Furthermore, the relatively small number of patients with diverse etiologies precluded a detailed statistical analysis of our data. Another shortcoming of the present study is the inadequacy of cystometric findings for some of the patients who refused urodynamic investigations. Nevertheless, our results and relevant literature confirm that invasive tests are not compulsory in the workup of all female AUR cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Among a population of outpatients presenting with acute emergency of urinary retention symptoms, the proportion of women with confirmed diagnosis of complete AUR was 23%. The causes of female AUR are diverse and may be multifactorial. Regardless of the etiology, prompt urethral catheterization with varied intervals resolved the acute emergency. The prognosis of outpatient female AUR cases in our study was generally favorable, with majority of women achieving spontaneous voiding following bladder decompression and correction of the underlying cause.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Prof. Dr. Tufan Tarcan, Marmara University School of Medicine, for critically reviewing the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Klarskov P, Andersen JT, Asmussen CF, Brenøe J, Jensen SK, Jensen IL, et al. Acute urinary retention in women: A prospective study of 18 consecutive cases. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1987;21:29–31. doi: 10.3109/00365598709180286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Van der Linden EF, Venema PL. Acute urinary retention in women. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998;142:1603–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC. Bladder outlet obstruction in women: Definition and characteristics. Neurourol Urodyn. 2000;19:213–20. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(2000)19:3<213::aid-nau2>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McCrery RJ, Appell RA. Bladder outlet obstruction in women: Iatrogenic, anatomic, and neurogenic. Curr Urol Rep. 2006;7:363–9. doi: 10.1007/s11934-006-0005-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:5–26. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0976-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Akikwala TV, Fleischman N, Nitti VW. Comparison of diagnostic criteria for female bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol. 2006;176:2093–7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:167–78. doi: 10.1002/nau.10052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pauwels E, De Wachter S, Wyndaele JJ. Normality of bladder filling studied in symptom-free middle-aged women. J Urol. 2004;171:1567–70. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000118164.39641.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ramsey S, Palmer M. The management of female urinary retention. Int Urol Nephrol. 2006;38:533–5. doi: 10.1007/s11255-005-5790-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F. Postoperative urinary retention: Anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:1139–57. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819f7aea. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Geller EJ. Prevention and management of postoperative urinary retention after urogynecologic surgery. Int J Womens Health. 2014;6:829–38. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S55383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yip SK, Sahota D, Pang MW, Chang A. Postpartum urinary retention. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:881–91. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00460.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Carley ME, Carley JM, Vasdev G, Lesnick TG, Webb MJ, Ramin KD, et al. Factors that are associated with clinically overt postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:430–3. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liang CC, Chang SD, Chang YL, Chen SH, Chueh HY, Cheng PJ. Postpartum urinary retention after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;99:229–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Patel R, Nitti V. Bladder outlet obstruction in women: Prevalence, recognition, and management. Curr Urol Rep. 2001;2:379–87. doi: 10.1007/s11934-996-0024-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mevcha A, Drake MJ. Etiology and management of urinary retention in women. Indian J Urol. 2010;26:230–5. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.65396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smith CP, Kraus SR, Boone TB. Urinary retention in the female. AUA update series. 1999;18:146–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Basson J, van der Walt CL, Heyns CF. Urinary retention in women. AJOL. 2013;31:182–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jeong SJ, Kim HJ, Lee YJ, Lee JK, Lee BK, Choo YM, et al. Prevalence and clinical features of detrusor underactivity among elderly with lower urinary tract symptoms: A comparison between men and women. Korean J Urol. 2012;53:342–8. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.5.342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Farrar DJ, Osborne JL, Stephenson TP, Whiteside CG, Weir J, Berry J, et al. A urodynamic view of bladder outflow obstruction in the female: Factors influencing the results of treatment. Br J Urol. 1975;47:815–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1975.tb04062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee CY, Kim CS, Cho WJ. Characteristics of urinary retention in female inpatients managed with medical treatments. Korean J Urol. 2015;56:817–22. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.12.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Curtis LA, Dolan TS, Cespedes RD. Acute urinary retention and urinary incontinence. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001;19:591–619. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(05)70205-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ahmad I, Krishna NS, Small DR, Conn IG. Aetiology and management of acute female urinary retention. Br J Med Surg Urol. 2009;2:27–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Van der Walt CL, Jansen van Vuuren SP, Heyns CF. Urinary retention in women: Causes and management. Afr J Urol. 2010;16:7–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.García-Fadrique G, Morales G, Arlandis S, Bonillo MA, Jiménez-Cruz JF. Causes, characteristics and mid-term course of acute urinary retention in women referred to a urodynamics unit. Actas Urol Esp. 2011;35:389–93. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2011.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Urology Annals are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES