Imaging to optimize liver tumor ablation

Abstract

Surgical resection remains the ideal treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma and metastasis to the liver. Many alternatives are available for treatment of nonsurgical candidates. Regardless of treatment, optimizing imaging in the pretreatment, treatment and post-treatment settings is critical in order to lower the rates of local tumor progression and maximize the effectiveness of treatment that may result in prolonged survival. This article summarizes some basic imaging techniques of primary and metastatic liver tumors with a focus on how to optimize their treatment with ablation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal metastases to the liver are the most common primary and secondary cancers of the liver. While the mainstay of curative treatment is surgery, only 10–20% of patients with HCC and 20–25% of patients with colorectal liver metastasis are resectable at the time of detection [1,2]. Resectability is often limited by location size or number of lesions, inadequate liver remnant, extrahepatic metastasis, as well as medical comorbidities that preclude open surgery. Various locoregional and systemic therapies have been investigated to target this large group of unresectable patients, including systemic chemo therapy, regional chemotherapy (hepatic artery infusion pump), transarterial therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), bland embolization and Yttrium 90 radioembolization, as well as ablative therapies (radiofrequency [RF] ablation, cryoablation, microwave ablation). Regardless of treatment modality, imaging characteristics of the tumor before, during and after treatment is important. Determination of tumor characteristics before treatment will allow the choice of the safest and most efficacious treatment. An understanding of tumor characteristics and its relationship to adjacent structures will allow optimization of treatment, decreasing the likelihood of local tumor progression (LTP; recurrence) and minimizing risks. Knowledge of the expected post-treatment changes and the imaging evolution of the treated tumor will allow early detection of LTP to facilitate early retreatment.

This article will focus on the utilization of imaging in the preprocedural and procedural phase of treatment of liver tumors with RF ablation and combination therapies. The postablation appearance of liver tumors has been discussed extensively elsewhere [3]. These imaging techniques are applicable to most ablative technologies; however, due to the widespread usage of RF ablation, this will be discussed primarily.

RF ablation

Radiofrequency ablation utilizes heat generated by frictional energy secondary to oscillating tissue ions, which are created by passing an alternating current through them. This current is created across an electrode placed within the target lesion and dispersive pads placed across the patient's skin. When tissues are heated, protein denaturation and cellular apoptosis occur leading to irreversible cell death in the form of coagulation necrosis in a zone around the electrode. These changes are time and temperature dependent with coagulation necrosis occurring when tissues are heated to 50°C for approximately 5 min, instantaneous cell death occurring at temperatures above 60°C and charring occurring at temperatures in the range of 100 to 110°C [4].

Radiofrequency ablation can be accomplished percutaneously, during an open surgical procedure or laparoscopically, and each has its advantages and disadvantages. Early surgical literature suggested that performing RF ablation open and laparoscopically increases the opportunity to detect previously unknown intrahepatic or extrahepatic disease [5]. Ablation has been used to treat lesions that are detected during surgery (utilizing intraoperative sonography) that are not resectable. This approach has improved the clinical outcomes after resection of liver tumors [6].

Imaging HCCs

Most patients will undergo a tri-phasic CT (nonenhanced, arterial and portal-equilibrium phases) evaluation prior to any therapy. Since the most efficacious treatment of HCC (percutaneous or open) as well as treatment of postsurgical recurrences have yet to be defined, imaging is directed initially to assess for operative candidacy [7,8]. Tumors limited to a single lobe with adequate residual hepatic reserve after resection and without findings of cirrhosis or portal hypertension, are considered ideal operative candidates. In addition to tumor burden, it is important to determine involvement and proximity to vasculature. Tumors that are close to or abut the porta hepatis may preclude complete surgical resection. For the most part, curative surgical management depends on whether a complete surgical resection with a clear margin (R0 resection) is achievable. Tumors that are deemed unresectable are then further evaluated for other potential treatments. Alternatives to surgical resection include systemic and regional chemotherapy, transarterial therapy, ablative techniques and combination therapy. The utilization of RF ablation alone in the treatment of HCC remains a much debated topic [9]. Size and number of HCC lesions is linked with efficacy, and should be the first characteristic evaluated on preprocedural CT. Survival rates at 5 years of up to 64% have been reported in treating solitary lesions of less than 3.5 cm or in treatment of less than three lesions that are each smaller than 3.0 cm in size [10]. In fact, two randomized controlled studies have demonstrated that percutaneous RF ablation may yield similar overall and disease-free survival to partial hepatectomy [11–13].

While size and number of lesions are important characteristics, additional characteristics such as proximity to large vascular structures, vessel patency, vascular supply to the tumor and associated bile duct obstruction should be assessed. Ablation of tumors abutting major vascular structures has been shown to be feasible, however, this location allows the flowing blood within the nearby vessel to carry the ablative energy away from the tumor, thus acting like a ‘heat sink’, diminishing the efficacy of the ablation and resulting in a higher local tumor recurrence rate (Figure 1). Mulier et al., in a meta-analysis, demonstrated that tumors that are at least 5 mm away from a large vessel had a significantly lower LTP rate (6.3%) compared with those that were less than 5 mm from a large vessel (37%) [14]. Lu et al. demonstrated that vessel size is also a factor, suggesting that peritumoral vessels larger than 3 mm were associated with incomplete tumor destruction [15]. Owing to the inherent nature of this technology, it is not simply a matter of increasing the power (watt-seconds) of the ablation to increase the zone of coagulation necrosis to compensate; with many investigators looking at ways to fine-tune the ablation protocol to increase ablative effectiveness [16,17]. As a matter of fact, thermal damage can rarely lead to damage and thrombosis in even large vessels, such as the main portal vein, if blood flow within that vessel is decreased [18]. Recently microwave technology and irreversible electroporation have been used and at least in vitro and in animal models, these modalities appear to be less or not at all influenced by the heat sink phenomenon.

Figure 1. Heat sink effect.

(A) Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrating a low-density region adjacent to surgical clips in the right hepatic lobe compatible with local tumor recurrence. Note the vessel (white arrow) along the deeper margin. (B) Contrast-enhanced CT and (C) PET demonstrating tumor recurrence adjacent to the vessel (arrows).

Assessment of the relationship between the biliary tree and target tumor is important since RF ablation may damage a bile duct leading to biliary stenosis with secondary dilatation of the peripheral biliary tree [19]. Stenosis and dilatation of these peripherally located ducts may progress to biloma formation, which are generally sub-clinical. Periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis is prudent to prevent secondary infection. While it has been shown that the central biliary tree may be protected by the heat sink effect of adjacent large vascular structures such as the portal vein, care should be taken [20].

The dramatic differences in outcomes and LTP in patients who have received ‘optimal’ RF ablation highlight the importance of proper imaging to determine both electrode positioning and ablation margins (Figure 2). Indeed, some studies have demonstrated that operator experience is associated with fewer local recurrences, and we surmise, that this may be related at least partly to comfort with imaging appearances during ablation (Figure 3) [21,22].

Figure 2. Confirming radiofrequency ablation probe location.

(A) Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrating an ideal lesion for ablation. The proximity of the lesion to the hepatic veins is more than 1 cm, allowing ablation with a good margin. Two intraprocedural CT images demonstrating deployment of a multitined radiofrequency electrode. Care is taken to demonstrate adequate coverage of the target lesion. (B) Ultrasound confirms targeting in real time and allows the monitoring of the created hyperechoic ablation zone that slowly covers the hypoechoic lesion.

Figure 3. Preablation as well as follow-up imaging in treatment of the patient in Figure 2.

(A) Preablation images demonstrate a low-density lesion in the right hepatic lobe that was treated with radiofrequency ablation (one electrode). (B) 24-h postablation image demonstrates a larger low-density area surrounding the ablated lesion with a greater than 1 cm ablation margin. (C) 1-year follow-up image demonstrates decreased density of the ablated liver parenchyma, which is also decreased in size since the immediate 24-h postablation image. Note that the ablated region is circular with adjacent low density, which reflects the ablated electrode tract. An ablation tail (open white arrow) represents changes from ablation of the electrode tract; extension of this tract to the liver capsule should be avoided.

Proper RF ablation requires intimate knowledge of the equipment being utilized. It is important to understand the different RF electrodes being used and their respective ablation size as well as shape. Earlier electrodes consisted of a single insulated needle design with a non-insulated tip. These electrodes produced either a spherical or oblong ablation zone. Newer probes, some of which are multi-tined, allow for a more reproducible shaped spherical ablation zone, with some internally cooled probes found in animal studies to produce a larger ablation zone [23]. Utilization of this newer technology has also been shown to translate to lower local tumor recurrence rates [24].

Percutaneous placement of the RF ablation electrode, unlike that of open placement, is heavily dependent upon imaging. One of the advantages of ultrasound is its capability for real-time imaging. Ultrasound-guided placement of the RF electrode allows the operator to avoid large vessels as well as compensate for respiratory variation of the target lesion. Disadvantages of ultrasound include its limited utility in targeting superficial lesions and its dependence on air-less interfaces. Adjacent air-filled structures (such as bowel and lungs) result in artifact and limits visualization of structures deep to this air interface. This is often where CT-guided placement of the RF electrode is necessary. Most interventional radiology departments (including ours) have both CT and ultrasound guidance ability. The use of both modalities can increase accurate targeting and monitoring of the ablation zone in order to provide the best possible outcome (Figure 2).

Although CT is not a real-time modality (if CT fluoroscopy is not employed), it offers a wider field of view and is not operator dependent. The current ability to create multiplanar reconstruction on CT also allows for improved placement of the RF electrode, which, in turn will likely result in a more complete ablation. Multiplanar imaging has been found to be helpful for assessing the ablation zone in the postprocedural setting. A recent study demonstrated that 2D imaging of the ablation zone in porcine livers may underestimate its size, and that 3D imaging with volumetric measurements may be of benefit [25]. This ability improves accuracy and allows the operator to ablate, in the same session, areas that may not have the desired ‘ablation margin’.

As alluded to earlier, each RF electrode is limited by the size of the effective ablation zone it can create. Charring within the ablation area decreases the ability for the current to be conducted, thus limiting effectiveness at the periphery. It has been determined that LTP occurs at the periphery of the ablation zone [26]. In fact, inadequate ablation margin, rather than subcapsular location and proximity to vascular structures, has been shown to be the strongest predictor of LTP [27]. Tumors that are larger than the known ‘effective’ ablation diameter or are irregular in shape often require multiple ablations to cover the entire area. This technique is often named ‘overlapping ablations/electrodes’. Secondary to technological limitations, multiple RF electrodes cannot be ‘on’ or ablating simultaneously. Therefore, careful preprocedural planning in the placement of one electrode performing multiple burns or of a cluster of electrodes prior to ablation is important. Anatomy and imaging appearance of the lesion changes secondary to bleeding or the normal postablation changes, making successive ablations and electrode positioning challenging during the same treatment session.

Similar to adequate surgical margins, ‘adequate’ ablation margins have been studied. An ablative margin of at least 5 mm has been associated with decreased LTP rates [28]. At our institution, we generally strive to achieve an ablation margin of 1 cm, which can be considered an ‘A0’ ablation, likened to a R0 resection for hepatectomy where no tumor is noted at surgical margins.

Large & multiple HCC lesions

Secondary to studies demonstrating increased LTP rates as high as 20% in treating tumors greater than 3.5 cm with RF ablation alone and poor tumor necrosis in treatment of lesions larger than 5.0 cm, alternative and combined therapies have been suggested [29,30]. Large and multiple lesions, in addition to being assessed for basic imaging characteristics, need to be assessed for tumor arterial supply. A characteristic of HCC is its highly vascular nature with preferential blood supply from the hepatic artery, making them suitable to transarterial therapies such as TACE, bland transarterial embolization (TAE) and combined transarterial therapy and ablation. Standard hepatic anatomy may not be found in many patients, underscoring the importance of an appropriate preprocedural imaging workup. One study demonstrated that in 350 HCCs, up to 11.9% of patients derived hepatic arterial supply from the superior mesenteric artery [31]. Collateral arterial feeders to HCC lesions may also be found and treated accordingly to improve treatment effectiveness [32].

Transarterial therapies such as TACE and TAE have been studied extensively in treatment of large HCC, certain HCC subtypes as well as in treatment of recurrent HCC after resection [33–35]. While the superiority of TACE over TAE remains controversial [36,37], several studies have demonstrated that combination of either TACE or TAE with RF ablation is superior to either therapy alone. Sugimori et al. demonstrated in an animal model that TAE in combination with RF ablation resulted in a larger region of coagulative necrosis [38]. In fact, a small study has shown some potential survival benefit in combination therapy in HCCs larger than 5.0 cm [39]. For the treatment of lesions that are refractory to TACE/TAE or with arterial anatomy not amendable to transarterial therapy, percutaneous ethanol injection or ablation can be utilized. Prior studies demonstrated that RF ablation is associated with better outcomes when compared with ethanol injection for lesions up to 4 cm in diameter [40,41]. Similar to other combination therapies, the combination of RF ablation-percutaneous ethanol injection has been shown to be more effective than either alone [42].

Imaging in colorectal metastasis

Preprocedural imaging of colorectal metastasis usually commences with a contrast-enhanced CT. However, we advocate the use of triphasic CT (similar to HCC). Although the arterial phase may not be as important as it is in the treatment planning for HCC, the noncontrast phase of the scan is important to identify the tumor in a similar manner to which it is going to be visualized by the CT used for guidance in the ablation procedure. Metastasis in different phases of growth, as well as partially treated meta stasis, may demonstrate different phases of vascular enhancement. Reminiscent of HCC imaging, assessment of the size and number of colorectal metastasis, proximity to vasculature and arterial supply are important. Several studies have demon strated that MRI, paricularly with liver-specific contrast, is more sensitive in detecting colorectal metastasis [43].

A preprocedural PET/CT should also be performed to determine if extrahepatic disease is present, which could alter treatment strategy (Figure 4). PET/CT has been shown to be more sensitive in detecting extrahepatic metastasis than traditional contrast-enhanced CT [44]. This same study also demonstrated that a manganese dipyridoxyl diphosphate liver MRI can be more effective in detecting intrahepatic disease than PET/CT. Studies comparing treatment of colorectal metastasis to the liver are varied [45]. In evaluation of the role of RF ablation in the treatment of colorectal cancers, a recent retrospective study asserts that hepatic resection should remain the mainstay of therapy for patients with solitary liver metastasis and RF ablation can be used in nonsurgical candidates with tumors less than 3 cm [46]. Additional studies would appear to confirm this, and as techniques for RF ablation advance, survival rates in patients treated with RF ablation are expected to improve [47]. In the meta-analysis by Mulier et al. it appears that overall survival after RF ablation is similar to that of resection, despite the fact that the ablation series included the patients that were not candidates for surgery. LTP rates remain higher after RF ablation when compared with surgery and this justifies the current recommendation of surgery as the gold standard [14].

Figure 4. Proper preprocedural workup is essential.

Traditional metastatic workup with contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates two metastatic lesions (A & B) (black arrows). PET/CT demonstrated additional lesions (black arrowheads), making the patient no longer a candidate for radiofrequency ablation (C).

Recently, a ‘test of time’ paradigm has been used in treatment of patients with metastatic disease to the liver [48]. In this model, patients are first treated with RF ablation and followed for a short interval. For those that demonstrate LTP, these patients can be treated with either follow-up RF ablation or resection. For those that are cured with RF ablation, these patients have been spared surgery. For those with multiple new sites of metastasis, they have been spared the potential morbidity associated with noncurative surgery. This series determined that 59% of patients were spared unnecessary surgery, either because they were free of disease after RF ablation (44%) or they developed multiple new sites of disease within a short period of time, which would have made them unsuitable for resection (56%).

A recent meta-analysis of 763 colorectal tumors metastatic to the liver demonstrated that, similar to HCC, tumor size, tumor distance from large vessels and adequate treatment margins were associated with decreased local recurrence rates [14]. Tumors treated with percutaneous RF ablation that were less than 3 cm in size had a 16.0% recurrence rate, while treated tumors that were 3–5 cm in size or larger than 5 cm had reported recurrence rates of 25.9 and 60.0%, respectively.

Similar to the treatment of HCC, large or multiple colorectal metastases may be treated with TACE, hepatic chemoperfusion (utilizing a hepatic arterial infusion pump) or radioembolization therapy with Yttrium 90 microspheres. The superiority of chemoperfusion over TACE is under debate [49].

Preparation of a patient for Yttrium 90 radio-embolization requires a meticulous assessment of tumor vasculature. Since these particles are impregnated with a pure β-emitter and lodged in their target organ, a very intense local radio-therapeutic effect is created. Assessment of arteries feeding the tumor and potential branches is important to reduce nontarget embolization. Evidence of uncorrectable flow to the GI tract at angiography or on technetium-88m macro aggregated albumin scintigraphy is a contraindication to this procedure [50].

Other metastases

Evaluation of other, less common, metastases to the liver is directed at determining stage (often with PET/CT) as well as vascularity. Knowledge of the primary tumor is also important as certain metastases are better detected using certain imaging modalities. Highly vascular tumors such as neuroendocrine, renal cell, thyroid and gastrointenstinal stromal tumor metastases will be better visualized on a triphasic CT, making these tumors more amenable to transarterial therapies. It must be noted that advanced localization techniques can also be used if RF ablation is the treatment of choice for a highly vascular lesion. As demonstrated in Figure 5, an initial arterial phase CT can be used to localize the lesion using local landmarks, allowing for placement of an initial localizing needle. Through this needle, contrast can be injected to make the target lesion more conspicuous for ablation.

Figure 5. Assisted targeting with contrast.

(A) Demonstrates a lesion within the right inferior hepatic lobe (open white arrow) that becomes more conspicuous with arterial phase imaging (B). (C) Initial targeting needle is placed in the region of the lesion (open white arrow). (D) Contrast is now injected into the initial targeting needle to increase conspicuity of the lesion (open white arrow) for ablation. (E) Targeting needle is removed and a larger bore ablation probe is placed and deployed. (F) Postablation image demonstrates a well-defined ablation zone (open white arrow).

Less vascular tumors such as breast cancer metastasis can simply be treated with ablative therapies such as RF ablation. In fact, our group and others have demonstrated that RF ablation is both safe and efficacious in controlling breast metastasis to the liver in selected patients with limited liver metastases and stable or no extrahepatic disease [51–53]. For these patients, PET/CT may be the most sensitive imaging modality to detect hepatic and extrahepatic lesions and should be used for staging and procedure planning prior to ablation.

Adjunctive imaging & techniques

Recent advances in sonography have given operators the ability to merge CT images with that of sonography. This ability will allow real-time placement of an RF electrode in lesions that may not be well visualized by ultrasound alone. Patients may undergo a contrast-enhanced or triphasic CT that shows the target lesions and these images may be seen in conjuction with ultrasound images, which will aid in targeting. In a similar fashion, newer fusion PET techniques may be utilized to target F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose avid lesions that do not demonstrate an obvious CT abnormality. Knowledge of the location of the tumor in relation to the liver capsule as well as adjacent organs also aids in planning of ablation. As discussed previously, an air-gap created by the lungs or bowel may hinder visualization during ultrasound-guided placement of the RF ablation electrode. Additionally, tumors adjacent to the diaphragm and bowel may risk injury to these organs if a complete ablation is sought after. Various investigators have proposed and shown feasibility of different isolation techniques that solve both problems with ultrasound visualization and nontarget organ insulation. Some of these measures include placement of fluid into the pleural space to improve ultrasound visualization, as well as hydrodissection, where fluid is introduced into the peritoneal space to separate a peripheral hepatic lesion from either the diaphragm, an adjacent organ or the GI tract [54,55]. While most early studies utilized saline as an infusate, recent studies suggest that 5% dextrose in water may act as a better buffer and in a small series, has been shown to decrease procedural pain and length of hospital stay (Figure 6) [56,57].

Figure 6. Protective hydrodissection allows ablation with clear margin without injury to the adjacent colon.

(A) Preablation noncontrast CT demonstrates a low-density lesion in the right inferior hepatic lobe (white arrows). The liver in this region is nearly adjacent to the hepatic flexure of the right colon (white line). (B) Post-electrode placement CT again demonstrates close proximity of the right colon to the liver. (C) After hydrodissection, the colon is pushed away by fluid density infusate (white arrow), allowing for safer ablation.

Future perspective

As the role of thermal ablation increases in the treatment of liver tumors, it is imperative for all those treating these patients to understand the importance of imaging in the diagnosis/planning phase as well as during the actual treatment and follow-up. Traditional approaches, such as hepatectomy, affords the operator direct visualization of the treatment field in 3D space. This allows the surgeon to continue resection until the entire tumor is removed and until he receives pathologic confirmation of a clear margin (whenever feasible). Additionally, open techniques allow for manipulation of the target organ to more advantageous positions, akin to what hydrodissection is striving to achieve. Surgery also has the advantage of pathologically evaluating the resected tumor in order to confirm that no residual tumor remains and that the resection has achieved a clear margin. Although the entire tumor cannot be examined in the case of locoregional treatments, tissue may be found on the electrodes and may be used to identify patients at risk for LTP. In a recent study we demonstrated that identification of prolific marker ki-67-positive cells on the RF electrode after ablation of liver malignancies up to 5 cm in diameter, is associated with overall six-times higher risk for LTP when compared with those tumors where only coagulation necrosis was found. This risk is ten-times higher for tumors under 3 cm [58].

Percutaneous approaches rely solely on imaging appearances. Advanced imaging techniques, such as multiplanar imaging, must be utilized to close the gap between open surgery and percutaneous techniques. It is important to evaluate the ablation margin at the end of each procedure in order to confirm that it encompasses the tumor with a clear margin. To that effect we strongly advocate the performance of immediate post-ablation contrast-enhanced CT that may identify part of the tumor being inadequately treated. In such a case additional ablation should be performed. This immediate CT should, however, not be used as the imaging study to evaluate the success of the ablation. Technical success should be evaluated on a contrast-enhanced CT (we again advocate a triphasic examination), as detailed in the reporting standards in image guided tumor ablation described by Goldberg et al., within 4–12 weeks after the ablation [59].

Similar to that for surgery, risk of liver failure and postprocedural morbidity and mortality for RF ablation is linked to the degree of preprocedural hepatic cirrhosis, as measured by the Child-Pugh classification. While further research will be required to better correlate imaging with clinical classification of liver disease, and thus better prediction of post-treatment liver function, several preliminary studies appear promising. Koda et al. determined that liver parenchymal function is only transiently decreased in patients with a low Child-Pugh score (<8) by RF ablation or combined TACE-ablation, whereas patients with high Child-Pugh scores (≥8) had an increased risk of serious postprocedural complications, with refractory ascites only seen in this group of patients [60]. This underscores the importance of evaluating not only the target lesion on either MRI or CT, but the residual liver parenchyma and signs of cirrhosis or portal hypertension.

Executive summary.

• ■ Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal metastasis to the liver are the most common primary and secondary cancers of the liver, respectively.

• ■ Treatments for primary and secondary liver tumors vary, however, regardless of treatment, pretreatment imaging is of the utmost importance to identify relationships of the tumor to vital structures and depict tumor characteristics that can guide treatment.

Radiofrequency ablation

• ■ Radiofrequency (RF) ablation utilizes heat generated by frictional energy to cause irreversible cell death.

• ■ Radiofrequency ablation can be accomplished both via an open surgical approach and percutaneously.

Imaging HCCs

• ■ Patients should undergo preprocedure triphasic liver CT.

• ■ Imaging is used to determine:

  • – Operative candidacy
  • – Tumors proximity to the porta or other vital structures may preclude surgery
  • – Determine best treatment if not an operative candidate
  • – RF ablation

    • – Size and number: treatment of solitary lesions less than 3.5 cm and fewer than three lesions smaller than 3.0 cm are associated with improved survival
    • – Proximity to vascular structures: peritumoral vessels larger than 3 mm may be associated with incomplete tumor destruction
    • – Proximity to bile ducts: there is a small risk of biliary stenosis or biloma formation in treatment of lesions close to the peripheral biliary tree

• ■ Equipment: many different RF electrodes are now available, all of which differ in profile and ablation size/shape. Knowledge of this equipment is important.

• ■ Probe placement: CT versus ultrasound.

  • – While ultrasound placement allows for real-time guidance, CT affords better visualization of adjacent structures and has the ability to easily create multiplanar reformats, which in turn may allow better electrode placement and a more accurate ablation
  • – Ablation margin of at least 5 mm has been associated with decreased local tumor progression (LTP)
  • – Large and multiple HCC lesions

• ■ RF ablation of large HCC lesions is associated with increased LTP rates and poor tumor necrosis.

• ■ Combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transarterial embolization and RF ablation for treatment of large HCC lesions shows promise.

Imaging in colorectal metastasis

• ■ Triphasic CT is also recommended for evaluation of colorectal metastasis to the liver. The noncontrast phase shows the tumor as it will be seen on the CT prior to ablation. The arterial phase may be helpful if ablation is not indicated and another treatment such Yttrium 90 radioembolization is considered.

• ■ PET/CT should also be performed to determine additional intrahepatic or extrahepatic disease (it has been shown to be more sensitive than traditional contrast-enhanced CT for detection of tumors).

• ■ Currently, studies suggest that hepatic resection remains the first line of treatment of patients with metastasis and ablation is a good option in nonsurgical candidates with small tumors that can be ablated with a clear margin.

• ■ Test of time paradigm

  • – Treat all patients with RF ablation first and follow for a short interval. Some patients will develop multiple metastasis, and these patients would have been spared potentially unnecessary surgery. Other patients will be free of disease and will be successfully maintained with RF ablation. Prior RF ablation does not preclude subsequent surgery
  • – This approach can be used in a consideration of ablation as the first treatment for tumors that can be ablated with a clear margin

• ■ Similar to treatment of HCC, tumor size, proximity to vessels and treatment margins are associated with LTP.

• ■ Alternatives to hepatic resection for metastasis include: ablation, TACE, hepatic chemoperfusion (utilizing hepatic artery infusion pumps), Yttrium 90 radioembolization and combination therapy.

Other metastasis

• ■ Knowledge of tumor vascularity is important as some tumors may be more effectively treated with RF ablation versus TACE and vice versa.

Adjunctive imaging & techniques

• ■ Fusion CT and ultrasound may help real-time placement of RF electrode.

• ■ Fusion PET techniques may benefit targeting tumors with only F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose abnormalities.

• ■ Tumor isolation techniques: hydrodissection.

Comments

• ■ Traditionally, surgery offers the advantage of pathologically evaluating the resected tumor. New studies have demonstrated that tissue from the RF electrode may also be evaluated in a similar fashion to determine patient risk for LTP.

• ■ Further research may help better understand the role of ablation and in what clinical circumstances it may be considered as the first treatment option for liver malignancies.