Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Hosp Med. 2016 Jan 13;11(5):317–323. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2534

Aggregate and Hospital-Level Impact of National Guidelines on Diagnostic Resource Utilization for Children with Pneumonia at Children’s Hospitals

Kavita Parikh 1, Matt Hall 2, Anne Blaschke 3, Carlos G Grijalva 4, Thomas V Brogan 5, Mark I Neuman 6, Derek Williams 7, Jeffrey S Gerber 8, Adam L Hersh 3, Samir S Shah 9
PMCID: PMC5103701  NIHMSID: NIHMS777907  PMID: 26762571

Abstract

BACKGROUND

National guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children were published in 2011. These guidelines discourage most diagnostic testing for outpatients, as well as repeat testing for hospitalized patients who are improving. We sought to evaluate the temporal trends in diagnostic testing associated with guideline implementation among children with CAP.

METHODS

Children 1 – 18 years who were discharged with pneumonia after emergency department (ED) evaluation or hospitalization from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2014 at any of 32 children’s hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System were included. We excluded children with complex chronic conditions and those requiring intensive care or who underwent early pleural drainage. We compared use of diagnostic testing (blood culture, complete blood count (CBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and chest radiography (CXR)) before and after release of the guidelines and assessed for temporal trends using interrupted time series analysis. We also calculated the cost impact of these changes on diagnostic utilization, and evaluated the variability of the guidelines impact across hospitals.

RESULTS

Overall, 220,539 patients were included; 53% were male and the median age was 4 years [interquartile range, 2, 7]. For patients discharged from the ED with CAP, diagnostic utilization rates for blood culture, CBC, CRP, and CXR were higher after guideline publication compared with expected utilization rates without guidelines. In contrast, initial testing and repeat testing among patients hospitalized with CAP was lower after guideline publication. There were modest reductions in estimated costs associated with these changes. However, wide variability was observed in the impact of the guidelines across hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Publication of national pneumonia guidelines in 2011 was associated with modest changes in diagnostic testing for children with CAP. However, the changes varied across hospitals and the financial impact was modest. Local implementation efforts are warranted to ensure widespread guideline adherence.

Keywords: pneumonia, guidelines, implementation, diagnostic tests

Introduction

Overutilization of resources is a significant, yet underappreciated problem in medicine. Many interventions target under-utilization (for example, immunizations) or mis-use (for example, antibiotic prescribing for viral pharyngitis), yet overutilization remains as a significant contributor to healthcare waste.[1] In an effort to reduce waste, the Choose Wisely campaign created a work group to highlight areas of overutilization, specifically noting both diagnostic tests and therapies for common pediatric conditions with no proven benefit, and possible harm to the patient.[2] Respiratory illnesses have been a target of many quality improvement efforts, and pneumonia represents a common diagnosis in pediatrics.[3] The use of diagnostic testing for pneumonia is an area in which care can be optimized and aligned with evidence.

Laboratory testing and diagnostic imaging are routinely used for the management of children with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Several studies have documented substantial variability in the use of these resources for pneumonia management, with higher resource use associated with a higher chance of hospitalization after emergency department (ED) evaluation and a longer length of stay among those requiring hospitalization.[4, 5] This variation in diagnostic resource utilization has been attributed, at least in part, to a lack of consensus on the management of pneumonia. There is wide variability in diagnostic testing and due to potential consequences for patients presenting with pneumonia, efforts to standardize care offer an opportunity to improve health care value.

In August 2011, the first national, evidence-based consensus guidelines for the management of childhood CAP were published jointly by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA).[6] A primary focus of these guidelines was the recommendation for the use of narrow spectrum antibiotics for the management of uncomplicated pneumonia. Previous studies have assessed the impact of the publication of the PIDS/IDSA guidelines on empiric antibiotic selection for the management of pneumonia.[7, 8] In addition, the guidelines provided recommendations regarding diagnostic test utilization, in particular discouraging blood tests (e.g. complete blood counts) and radiologic studies for non-toxic, fully immunized children treated as outpatients, as well as repeat testing during for children hospitalized with CAP who are improving.

While single centers have demonstrated changes in utilization patterns based on clinical practice guidelines [912], whether these guidelines have impacted diagnostic test utilization among US children with CAP in a larger scale remains unknown. Therefore, we sought to determine the impact of the PIDS/IDSA guidelines on the use of diagnostic testing among children with CAP using a national sample of U.S. children’s hospitals. Since the guidelines discourage repeat diagnostic testing in patients who are improving, we also evaluated the association between repeat diagnostic studies and severity of illness.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used data from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) (Children’s Hospital Association, Overland Park, KS). The PHIS database contains de-identified administrative data, detailing demographic, diagnostic, procedure, and billing data from 47 freestanding, tertiary care children’s hospitals. This database accounts for approximately 20% of all annual pediatric hospitalizations in the U.S. Data quality is ensured through a joint effort between the Children’s Hospital Association and participating hospitals.

Patient Population

Data from 32 (of the 47) hospitals included in PHIS with complete inpatient and ED data were used to evaluate hospital level resource utilization for children 1 to 18 years of age discharged January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2014 with a diagnosis of pneumonia (ICD9 codes 480.x–486.x, 487.0).[13] Our goal was to identify previously healthy children with uncomplicated pneumonia, so we excluded patients with complex chronic conditions[14], billing charges for intensive care management and/or pleural drainage procedure (IDC9 codes 510.0, 510.9, 511.0, 511.1, 511.8, 511.9, 513.x) on day of admission or the next day, or prior pneumonia admission in the last 30 days. We studied two mutually exclusive populations: children with pneumonia treated in the ED (i.e., patients who were evaluated in the ED and discharged to home), and children hospitalized with pneumonia, including those admitted through the ED.

Guideline Publication and Study periods

For an exploratory before and after comparison, patients were grouped into two cohorts based on a guideline online publication date of August 1, 2011: pre guideline (January 1, 2008 to July 31, 2011) and post guideline (August 1, 2011 to June 30, 2014).

Study outcomes

The measured outcomes were the monthly proportion of pneumonia patients for whom specific diagnostic tests were performed, as determined from billing data. The diagnostic tests evaluated were complete blood count (CBC), blood culture, C-reactive protein (CRP), and chest radiograph (CXR). Standardized costs were also calculated from PHIS charges as previously described to standardize the cost of the individual tests and remove inter-hospital cost variation.[3]

Relationship of Repeat Testing and Severity of Illness

Because higher illness severity and clinical deterioration may warrant repeat testing, we also explored the association of repeat diagnostic testing for inpatients with severity of illness by using the following variables as measures of severity: length of stay (LOS), transfer to intensive care unit (ICU) or pleural drainage procedure after admission (>2 calendar days after admission). Repeat diagnostic testing was stratified by number of tests.

Statistical Analysis

The categorical demographic characteristics of the pre- and post-guideline populations were summarized using frequencies and percentages, and compared using chi-square tests. Continuous demographics were summarized with medians and inter-quartile ranges (IQR’s) and compared with the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test. Segmented regression, clustered by hospital, was used to assess trends in monthly resource utilization as well as associated standardized costs before and after guidelines publication. To estimate the impact of the guidelines overall, we compared the observed diagnostic resource use at the end of the study period with expected use projected from trends in the pre-guidelines period (i.e., if there were no new guidelines). Individual interrupted time series were also built for each hospital. From these models, we assessed which hospitals had a significant difference between the rate observed at the end of the study and that estimated from their pre-guideline trajectory. To assess the relationship between the number of positive improvements at a hospital and hospital characteristics, we used Spearman’s correlation and Kruskal-Wallis tests. All analyses were performed with SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC), and P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. In accordance with the policies of the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Institutional Review Board, this research, using a de-identified data set, was not considered human subjects research.

Results

There were 275,288 hospital admissions meeting study inclusion criteria of 1–18 years of age with diagnosis of pneumonia from 2008 to 2014. Of these, 54,749 met exclusion criteria (1874 had pleural drainage procedure on Day 0 or 1; 51,306 had complex chronic conditions; 1569 were hospitalized with pneumonia in last 30 days). Characteristics of the remaining 220,539 patients in the final sample are shown in Table 1. The median age was 4 years (IQR 2 to 7 years); a majority of the children were male (53%) and had public insurance (58%). There were 128,855 patients in the pre guideline period (January 1, 2008 to July 31, 2011) and 91,684 in the post guideline period (August 1, 2011 to Jun 30, 2014).

Table 1.

Patient Demographics

Overall Pre-Guideline Post-Guideline p
No. Discharges 220539 128855 91684
Type of Encounter ED Only 150215 (68.1) 88790 (68.9) 61425 (67) <.001
Inpt/Obs 70324 (31.9) 40065 (31.1) 30259 (33)
Age 1–4 129360 (58.7) 77802 (60.4) 51558 (56.2) <.001
5–9 58609 (26.6) 32708 (25.4) 25901 (28.3)
10–18 32570 (14.8) 18345 (14.2) 14225 (15.5)
Median [IQR] 4 [2, 7] 3 [2, 7] 4 [2, 7] <.001
Gender Male 116718 (52.9) 68319 (53) 48399 (52.8) 0.285
Female 103813 (47.1) 60532 (47) 43281 (47.2)
Race Non-Hisp White 84423 (38.3) 47327 (36.7) 37096 (40.5) <.001
Non-Hisp Black 60062 (27.2) 35870 (27.8) 24192 (26.4)
Hisp 51184 (23.2) 31167 (24.2) 20017 (21.8)
Asian 6444 (2.9) 3691 (2.9) 2753 (3)
Other 18426 (8.4) 10800 (8.4) 7626 (8.3)
Payor Gov 128047 (58.1) 70742 (54.9) 57305 (62.5) <.001
Private 73338 (33.3) 44410 (34.5) 28928 (31.6)
Other 19154 (8.7) 13703 (10.6) 5451 (5.9)
Disposition HHS 684 (0.3) 411 (0.3) 273 (0.3) <.001
Home 209710 (95.1) 123236 (95.6) 86474 (94.3)
Other 9749 (4.4) 4962 (3.9) 4787 (5.2)
SNF 396 (0.2) 246 (0.2) 150 (0.2)
Season Spring 60171 (27.3) 36709 (28.5) 23462 (25.6) <.001
Summer 29891 (13.6) 17748 (13.8) 12143 (13.2)
Fall 52161 (23.7) 28332 (22) 23829 (26)
Winter 78316 (35.5) 46066 (35.8) 32250 (35.2)
LOS 1–3 204812 (92.9) 119497 (92.7) 85315 (93.1) <.001
4–6 10454 (4.7) 6148 (4.8) 4306 (4.7)
7+ 5273 (2.4) 3210 (2.5) 2063 (2.3)
Median [IQR] 1 [1, 1] 1 [1, 1] 1 [1, 1] 0.144
Admitted Pts, Median [IQR] 2 [1, 3] 2 [1, 3] 2 [1, 3] <.001

Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; HHS, home health services; IQR, interquartile range; LOS, length of stay; SNF, skilled nursing facility.

Discharged from the ED

Throughout the study, utilization of CBC, blood cultures and CRP was <20%, whereas CXR use was >75%. In segmented regression analysis, CRP utilization was relatively stable before the guidelines publication. However, by the end of the study period, the projected estimate of CRP utilization without guidelines (expected) was 2.9% compared with 4.8% with the guidelines (observed) (p<0.05) (Figure 1). A similar pattern of higher rates of diagnostic utilization after the guidelines compared with projected estimates without the guidelines was also seen in the ED utilization of CBC, blood cultures, and CXR (Figure 1); however, these trends did not achieve statistical significance. Table 2 provides specific values. Using a standard cost of $19.52 for CRP testing, annual costs across all hospitals increased $11,783 for ED evaluation of CAP.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Utilization Patterns for Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department

Table 2.

Utilization Rates Over Study Period

Estimates at End of Study
Baseline (%) Pre-Guideline Trend Level Change at Guideline Change in Trend after Guideline Without Guideline (%) With Guideline (%) p
ED Only Encounters
Blood Culture 14.6 −0.1 −0.8 0.1 5.5 8.6 NS
CBC 19.2 −0.1 −0.4 0.1 10.7 14.0 NS
CRP 5.4 0.0 −0.6 0.1 2.9 4.8 <0.05
Chest X-Ray 85.4 −0.1 −0.1 0.0 80.9 81.1 NS
Inpatient Encounters
Blood Culture 50.6 0.0 −1.7 −0.2 49.2 41.4 <0.05
Repeat Blood Culture 6.5 0.0 −1.0 −0.1 8.9 5.8 NS
CBC 65.2 0.0 −3.1 0.0 65.0 62.2 NS
Repeat CBC 23.4 0.0 −4.2 0.0 20.8 16.0 NS
CRP 25.7 0.0 −1.1 0.0 23.8 23.5 NS
Repeat CRP 12.5 −0.1 −2.2 0.1 7.1 7.3 NS
Chest X-Ray 89.4 −0.1 −0.7 0.0 85.4 83.9 NS
Repeat Chest X-Ray 25.5 0.0 −2.0 −0.1 24.1 17.7 <0.05

Abbreviations: CBC, complete blood count; CRP, C-reactive protein; ED, emergency department; NS, not significant (P > 0.05).

*

Estimates are based on pre and post guideline trends.

Inpatient Encounters

In the segmented regression analysis of children hospitalized with CAP, guideline publication was associated with changes in the monthly use of some diagnostic tests. For example, by the end of the study period, the use of blood culture was 41.4% (observed), whereas the projected estimated use in the absence of the guidelines was 49.2% (expected) (p<0.05) (Figure 2). Table 2 includes the data for the other tests: CBC, CRP, and CXR, in which similar patterns are noted with lower utilization rates after the guidelines, compared with expected utilization rates without the guidelines; however, these trends did not achieve statistical significance. Evaluating the utilization of repeat testing for inpatients, only repeat CXR achieved statistical significance (p<0.05) with utilization rates of 17.7% with the guidelines (actual) compared with 24.1% without the guidelines (predicted).

Figure 2. Utilization Patterns for Patients Admitted to the Hospital.

Figure 2

Upper trajectory represents initial utilization, and lower trajectory represents repeat utilization.

To better understand the use of repeat testing, a comparison of severity outcomes – LOS, ICU transfer, and pleural drainage procedures – was performed between patients with no repeat testing (70%) and patients with 1 or more repeat tests (30%). Patients with repeat testing had longer LOS [no repeat testing LOS 1 [IQR 1,2] vs 1 repeat test LOS 3 [2,4] vs 2+ repeat tests LOS 5 [3,8], higher rate of ICU transfer [no repeat testing 4.6% vs 1 repeat test 14.6% vs 2+ repeat test 35.6%], and higher rate of pleural drainage [no repeat testing 0% vs 1 repeat test 0.1% vs 2+ repeat test 5.9%] (all p-value <0.001).

Using standard costs of $37.57 for blood cultures, and $73.28 for CXR, annual costs for children with CAP across all hospitals decreased $91,512 due to decreased utilization of blood cultures, and $146,840 due to decreased utilization of CXR.

Hospital-Level Variation in the Impact of the National Guideline

Figure 3 is a visual representation (“heatmap”) of the impact of the guidelines at the hospital level at the end of the study from the individual interrupted time series. Based on this heatmap (Figure 3), there was wide variability between hospitals in the impact of the guideline on each test in different settings (ED or inpatient). By diagnostic testing, 7 hospitals significantly decreased utilization of blood cultures for inpatients, and 5 hospitals significantly decreased utilization for repeat blood cultures and repeat CXR. Correlation between the number of positive improvements at a hospital and region (p=0.974), number of CAP cases (p=0.731), or percentage of public insurance (p=0.241) were all non-significant.

Figure 3. Utilization Patterns by Hospital.

Figure 3

White boxes represent no significant change between what would be expected from the pre-guideline trend, dark gray is significant decreased in diagnostic testing and light gray is significant increase in diagnostic testing

Discussion

This study complements previous assessments by evaluating the impact of the 2011 IDSA/PIDS consensus guidelines on the management of children with CAP cared for at U.S. children’s hospitals. Prior studies have shown increased use of narrow-spectrum antibiotics for children with CAP after the publication of these guidelines.[7] The current study focused on diagnostic testing for CAP before and after the publication of the 2011 guidelines. In the ED setting, use of some diagnostic tests (blood culture, CBC, CXR, CRP) was declining prior to guideline publication, but appeared to plateau and/or increase after 2011. Among children admitted with CAP, use of diagnostic testing was relatively stable prior to 2011, and use of these tests (blood culture, CBC, CXR, CRP) declined after guideline publication. Overall, changes in diagnostic resource utilization three years after publication were modest, with few changes achieving statistical significance. There was a large variability in the impact of guidelines on test use between hospitals.

For outpatients, including those managed in the ED, the PIDS/IDSA guidelines recommend limited laboratory testing in nontoxic, fully immunized patients. The guidelines discourage the use of diagnostic testing among outpatients because of their low yield (e.g., blood culture), and because test results may not impact management (e.g., CBC).[6] In the years prior to guideline publication, there was already a declining trend in testing rates, including blood cultures, CBC, and CRP, for patients in the ED. After guideline publication, the rate of blood cultures, CBC, and CRP increased, but only the increase in CRP utilization achieved statistical significance. We would not expect utilization for common diagnostic tests (for example, CBC for outpatients with CAP) to be at or close to 0% because of the complexity of clinical decision making regarding admission that factors in aspects of patient history, exam findings, and underlying risk.[15] ED utilization of blood cultures was less than 10%, CBC less than 15%, and CRP less than 5% after guideline publication, which may represent the lowest testing limit that could be achieved.

CXRs obtained in the ED did not decrease over the entire study period. The rates of CXR use (close to 80%) seen in our study are similar to prior ED studies.[5, 16] Management of children with CAP in the ED might be different than outpatient primary care management because (1) unlike primary care providers, ED providers do not have an established relationship with their patients and do not have the opportunity for follow-up and serial exams, making them less likely to tolerate diagnostic uncertainty, and (2) ED providers may see sicker patients. However, use of CXR in the ED does represent an opportunity for further study to understand if decreased utilization is feasible without adversely impacting clinical outcomes.

The CAP guidelines provide a strong recommendation to obtain blood culture in moderate to severe pneumonia. Despite this, blood culture utilization declined after guideline publication. Less than 10% of children hospitalized with uncomplicated CAP have positive blood cultures, which calls into question the utility of blood cultures for all admitted patients.[1719] The recent “Epidemiology of Pneumonia in the Community” (EPIC) study showed that a majority of children hospitalized with pneumonia do not have growth of bacteria in culture, but there may be a role for blood cultures in patients with a strong suspicion of complicated CAP or in the patient with moderate to severe disease.[20] In addition to blood cultures, the guidelines also recommend CBC and CXR in moderate to severely ill children. This observed decline in testing in CBC and CXR may be related to individual physician assessments of which patients are moderately to severely ill as the guidelines do not recommend testing for children with less severe disease. Our exclusion of patients requiring intensive care management or pleural drainage on admission might have selected children with a milder course of illness, although still requiring admission.

The guidelines discourage repeat diagnostic testing among children hospitalized with CAP who are improving. In this study, repeat CXR and CBC occurred in approximately 20% of patients, but repeat blood culture and CRP was much lower. As with initial diagnostic testing for inpatients with CAP, the rates of some repeat testing decreased with the guidelines. However, those with repeat testing had longer LOS and were more likely to require ICU transfer or a pleural drainage procedure compared to children without repeat testing. This suggests that repeat testing is used more often in children with a severe presentation or a worsening clinical course, and not done routinely on hospitalized patients.

The financial impact of decreased testing is modest because the tests themselves are relatively inexpensive. However, the lack of substantial cost savings should not preclude efforts to continue to improve adherence to the guidelines. Not only is increased testing associated with higher hospitalization rates, [5] potentially yielding higher costs and family stress, increased testing may also leads to patient discomfort and possibly increased radiation exposure through chest radiography.

Many of the diagnostic testing recommendations in the CAP guidelines are based on weak evidence, which may contribute to the lack of substantial adoption. Nevertheless, adherence to guideline recommendations requires sustained effort on the part of individual physicians that should be encouraged through institutional support.[21] Continuous education and clinical decision support as well as reminders in the electronic medical record would make guideline recommendations more visible and may help overcome the inertia of previous practice. [15] The hospital level heat-map (Figure 3) included in this study demonstrates that the impact of the guidelines was variable across sites. While a few sites had decreased diagnostic testing in many areas with no increased testing in any category, there were several sites that had no improvement in any diagnostic testing category. In addition, hospital-level factors like size, geography, and insurance status were not associated with number of improvements. In order to better understand drivers of change at individual hospitals, future studies should evaluate specific strategies utilized by the rapid guideline adopters.

This study is subject to several limitations. The use of ICD-9 codes to identify patients with CAP may not capture all patients with this diagnosis; however, these codes have been previously validated.[13]. Additionally, because patients were identified using ICD-9 coding assigned at the time of discharge, testing performed in the ED setting may not reflect care for a child with known pneumonia, but rather may reflect testing for a child with fever or other signs of infection. PHIS collects data from free standing children’s hospitals which care for a majority of children with CAP in the U.S but our findings may not be generalizable to other hospitals. In addition, we did not examine drivers of trends within individual institutions. We did not have detailed information to examine whether the PHIS hospitals in our study had actively worked to adopt the CAP guidelines. We were also unable to assess physician’s familiarity with guidelines or the level of disagreement with the recommendations. Furthermore, the PHIS database does not permit detailed correlation of diagnostic testing with clinical parameters. In contrast to the diagnostic testing evaluated in this study, which is primarily discouraged by the IDSA/PIDS guidelines, respiratory viral testing for children with CAP is recommended but could not be evaluated as data on such testing is not readily available in PHIS.

Conclusion

Publication of the IDSA/PIDS evidence-based guidelines for the management of CAP was associated with modest, variable changes in use of diagnostic testing. Further adoption of the CAP guidelines should reduce variation in care and decrease unnecessary resource utilization in the management of CAP. Our study demonstrates that efforts to promote decreased resource utilization should target specific situations; for example, repeat testing for inpatients who are improving. Adherence to guidelines may be improved by the adoption of local practices that integrate and improve daily workflow, like order sets and clinical decision support tools.

Acknowledgments

Funding Source: None

Abbreviations

ED

Emergency department

CBC

complete blood count

CXR

chest radiography

CRP

c-reactive protein

CAP

community-acquired pneumonia

PIDS

Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society

IDSA

Infectious Diseases Society of America

PHIS

Pediatric Health Information System

LOS

length of stay

ICU

intensive care unit

Footnotes

Financial Disclosures: Authors have no financial disclosures

Conflict of Interest: Authors have no conflicts of interest

References

  • 1.Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA. 2012;307(14):1513–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Quinonez RA, et al. Choosing wisely in pediatric hospital medicine: five opportunities for improved healthcare value. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(9):479–85. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Keren R, et al. Prioritization of comparative effectiveness research topics in hospital pediatrics. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(12):1155–64. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brogan TV, et al. Variability in processes of care and outcomes among children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012;31(10):1036–41. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31825f2b10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Florin TA, et al. Variation in emergency department diagnostic testing and disposition outcomes in pneumonia. Pediatrics. 2013;132(2):237–44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bradley JS, et al. The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(7):e25–76. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ross RK, et al. Impact of Infectious Diseases Society of America/Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society guidelines on treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized children. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(6):834–8. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Williams DJ, et al. Antibiotic Choice for Children Hospitalized With Pneumonia and Adherence to National Guidelines. Pediatrics. 2015;136(1):44–52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ambroggio L, et al. Quality improvement methods increase appropriate antibiotic prescribing for childhood pneumonia. Pediatrics. 2013;131(5):e1623–31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Murtagh Kurowski E, et al. Improvement methodology increases guideline recommended blood cultures in children with pneumonia. Pediatrics. 2015;135(4):e1052–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Newman RE, et al. Impact of a guideline on management of children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3):e597–604. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Smith MJ, et al. Effectiveness of antimicrobial guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia in children. Pediatrics. 2012;129(5):e1326–33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Williams DJ, et al. Identifying pediatric community-acquired pneumonia hospitalizations: Accuracy of administrative billing codes. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(9):851–8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Feudtner C, et al. Pediatric complex chronic conditions classification system version 2: updated for ICD-10 and complex medical technology dependence and transplantation. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:199. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Parikh K, Agrawal S. Establishing Superior Benchmarks of Care in Clinical Practice: A Proposal to Drive Achievable Health Care Value. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Neuman MI, et al. Emergency department management of childhood pneumonia in the United States prior to publication of national guidelines. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(3):240–6. doi: 10.1111/acem.12088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Myers AL, et al. Prevalence of bacteremia in hospitalized pediatric patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32(7):736–40. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318290bf63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Heine D, et al. The prevalence of bacteremia in pediatric patients with community-acquired pneumonia: guidelines to reduce the frequency of obtaining blood cultures. Hosp Pediatr. 2013;3(2):92–6. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2012-0050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Williams DJ. Do all children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia require blood cultures? Hosp Pediatr. 2013;3(2):177–9. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2013-0005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jain S, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. children. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(9):835–45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Neuman MI, et al. Influence of hospital guidelines on management of children hospitalized with pneumonia. Pediatrics. 2012;130(5):e823–30. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES