Skip to main content
PMC home page
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0166079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166079

Bacillus methylotrophicus Strain NKG-1, Isolated from Changbai Mountain, China, Has Potential Applications as a Biofertilizer or Biocontrol Agent

Beibei Ge 1, Binghua Liu 1, Thinn Thinn Nwet 2, Wenjun Zhao 1, Liming Shi 1, Kecheng Zhang 1,*
Editor: Vijai Gupta3
PMCID: PMC5104391  PMID: 27832162

Abstract

Chemical pesticides are widely used in agriculture, which endangers both environmental health and food safety. Biocontrol is an environmentally-friendly and cost-effective green technique in environmental protection and agricultural production; it generally uses selected bioresources, including beneficial microorganisms. We isolated a novel bacterial strain (NKG-1) from the rare dormant volcanic soils of Changbai Mountain in China’s Jilin Province. The strain was identified as Bacillus methylotrophicus using morphological, biochemical, physiological, and phylogenetic 16S rDNA sequencing data. This strain was able to suppress mycelial growth and conidial germination of numerous plant pathogenic fungi on solid media. A greenhouse experiment showed that application of NKG-1 fermentation broth prior to inoculation of Botrytis cinerea, the cause of gray tomato mold, inhibited growth of the mold by 60%. Furthermore, application of a 100× dilution of NKG-1 fermentation broth to tomato seedlings yielded a significant increase in seedling fresh weight (27.4%), seedling length (12.5%), and root length (57.7%) compared to the control. When the same dosage was applied in the field, we observed increases in tomato plant height (14.7%), stem diameter (12.7%), crown width (16.3%), and maximum fruit diameter (11.5%). These results suggest that NKG-1 has potential commercial application as a biofertilizer or biocontrol agent.

Introduction

Over the past decade, chemical fungicides have frequently been used in agriculture; this has resulted in both environmental pollution and food security issues [1]. Intensive use of chemical fungicides has led to fungicide resistance and increased soil contamination; furthermore, these compounds may be toxic to microbial communities [2, 3]. Biocontrol with beneficial microorganisms has been shown to be an environmentally sound option to increase crop yields and prevent outbreaks of pathogenic bacteria [4, 5]. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), soil bacteria that colonize plant roots, interact with plant roots and can influence plant growth by scavenging reactive oxygen species, hydrogen peroxide, and volatile compounds [6, 7]. In general, these bacteria inhibit pathogen growth via exudation of antibiotics, inhibition of phytopathogens, induced systemic resistance, parasitism of phytopathogens, and out-competing phytopathogens for space and nutrients [8, 9].

Bacillus sp., Streptomyces sp., Penicillium sp., and Trichoderma sp. have been developed as effective microbial control agents that are alternatives to chemical compounds [8, 10, 11–13], and have been tested against various pathogens. Bacillus sp. are considered to be safe microorganisms and synthesize substances that suppress many plant pathogens including Sclerotinia sclerotiorum [14], Fusarium oxysporum [15], Verticillium sp. [16], Eutypa lata [17], Botrytis cinerea [18], Penicillium digitatum [19] and Rhizoctonia solani [20], both in vitro and in vivo. Previous reports have shown that many different strains of Bacillus methylotrophicus have antimicrobial properties, such as the H8 (antagonistic activity towards Ralstonia solanacearum [21]) and the BC79 (antagonistic activity towards Magnaporthe oryzae and Bortytis cinerea [22]) strains. Meanwhile, other strains can produce biosurfactants and ferulic acid degrading products [23, 24].

In this study, we isolated Bacillus methylotrophicus NKG-1 and evaluated its ability for biocontrol in an agricultural setting. Our results show that this strain is an effective biocontrol agent against 13 kinds of soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi, including Botryosphaeria dothidea, Phyllosticta ampelicide, Valsa ceratosperma, and Botrytis cinerea, and can promote growth of tomato plants in both greenhouse and field settings.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection and isolation

Soil samples were collected in the Changbai Mountains (40°15’N, 100°13’E, 2749 m elevation) in China’s Jilin Province. Soil samples were random collected from the top layer (2–15 cm) of soil near the roots of Pinus koraiensis plants. Each sample was placed in plastic bag during sample collection, and 100 g were taken from each sample for isolation and stored at 4°C in suitable plastic cans until use. Soil suspensions were prepared (1 g soil in 100 mL sterile water, shaken at 220 rpm for 5 min), serially diluted (down to 10−6), and 0.25 mL of supernatant from the last three dilutions was plated on Tryptone-Soybean-Agar (TSA). Agar medium plates were incubated at 28°C, and colonies appeared after 24–48 h. Single colonies were picked and inoculated in Luria-Bertani (LB), Potato-Dextrose-Agar (PDA), and Nutrient-Agar (NA) test tubes. For long term preservation, the isolated strains were stored at -20°C in Eppendorf tubes containing LB and 20% glycerol.

Morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of NKG-1

The morphological, biochemical, and physiological properties of strain NKG-1 were determined according to the procedures outlined in Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology [25]. Standard protocols [26] were used to assess oxidase activity, degradation of gelatin, nitrate reduction, carbon source utilization, and H2S production from thiosulfate [27].

16S rDNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

The DNA of NKG-1 was extracted and purified with a commercial DNA extraction kit according to the manufacturer’s instruction (TransGen Biotech, China). The extracted DNA was amplified (16S rDNA gene) by PCR using the of universal forward primer F1 (5'-GCAGTCGAGCGGACAGAT-3') and reverse primer R1 (5'-AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA-3'). The PCR mixture contained 2.0 μL 10 × Taq buffer, 1.6 mL MgCl2 (25 mM), 1.6 mL dNTP (2.5 mM), 1.0 mL of each primer, 0.5 mL DNA template, 0.2mL Taq DNA polymerase (10000 U mL-1), and water to 20μL. The thermocycling conditions were: 1 cycle of 5 min at 94°C; 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 51°C, and 1 min 30s at 72°C, and; a final extension step of 10 min at 72°C. PCR products were then sequenced using an automated DNA sequencer (ABI PRISMTM 3730XL DNA Analyzer). The resulting 16S rRNA gene sequences were compared in a BLAST search to the NCBI database. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the MEGA software package (Version 5.0) [28]. The relationships between sequences were analyzed using the neighbor-joining method. Bootstrap analysis was used to evaluate the tree topology of the neighbor-joining data by analyzing 1,000 randomized data sets.

Inoculum and fermentation

NKG-1 spores (1.0×107 CFU/ml) were inoculated into 50 mL of LB medium in a 250 ml baffled flask and incubated for 18 h at 25–30°C in a rotary shaker with stirring at 180–200 rpm. Fermentation was performed in 1000 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 200 mL of sterile production medium. The fermentation medium was inoculated with 1% (v/v) of a 24 h culture, which consisted of 1.0% peptone, 1.0% sodium chloride, and 1.0% yeast extract at pH 7.2. The inoculated flasks were kept on a rotary shaker (180–200 rpm) with aeration at 25–30°C. The final fermentation product was 106−109 CFU /mL.

In vitro assay of antagonistic activity

The plate confrontation method was used to detect strains with antagonistic abilities. Fungal cakes were placed in the center of PDA plates, bacterial colonies were cultured 2–3 cm from the cakes at 30°C for 72 h, and inhibition diameter was calculated. Negative control plates had no bacteria (only distilled water). The inhibition effect of culture fermentation of antagonistic bacterium (incubated at 30°C and 220 rpm for 48 h) was detected by the diameter assay [29]. Each treatment was repeated three times. The inhibition rate was calculated as: (control diameter–inhibition diameter) / control diameter × 100%.

Rhodotorula rubra was incubated in PDA medium overnight at 28°C and used as an indicator strain in bioassays. Thirteen fungal plant pathogens were tested: Botrytis cinerea, Fulvia fulva, Fusarium graminearum, Rhizoctonia cerealis, Bipolaris maydis, Valsa ceratosperma, Fusarium oxysporum, Colletotrichum lagenarium, Pyricularia oryzae, Gloeosporium capsici, Alternaria alternate, Botryosphaeria dothidea, and Phyllosticta ampelicide (all from the Plant Protection Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences). The fungi were stored at 0–4°C on PDA medium and grown in culture medium at 28°C for 5–7 days before performing the antagonistic experiments.

Evaluation of isolates in a greenhouse setting

Inoculation of Botrytis cinerea

Spot experiments were conducted on detached tomato leaves. Healthy leaves were detached from tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicon cv. No. 6 Zhongshu) at an early stage. Tomato leaves were inoculated with Botrytis cinerea after being sprayed with NKG-1 fermentation broth. Each plant was sprayed with 20 mL of 1.0×107 CFU/mL culture broth. Leaves were placed with the adaxial surface facing up on moist paper towels in an enamel tray. Mycelial plugs of Botrytis cinerea removed from 2 d old PDA cultures were individually placed next to the main leaf veins. Detached tomato leaves inoculated with plain PDA were used as a control. The trays with the Botrytis-inoculated leaves were individually covered with a 5.0 mm thick transparent plastic film and incubated at 25°C in a growth chamber (12 h light/12 h dark cycles) for 7 d. Each treatment was repeated three times with ten leaves.

Disease assessment

The diameter of the leaf lesion formed around each inoculated mycelial plug was measured, and the disease incidence (%) for each treatment was calculated based as the number of the inoculation points with lesion formation divided by the total number of inoculated plugs. The biocontrol efficacy was rated using the method described by Xue [30]. Each treatment was repeated three times.

Evaluating the capability for tomato plant fertilization under greenhouse and field conditions

To determine whether or not the potential selected antagonistic isolates could enhance plant growth, we tested the plant growth promotion activity in both greenhouse and field conditions. Fermentation broth (1.0×107 CFU/mL) was irrigated to the roots of plants and also sprayed on the tomato seedlings when they had 2–3 leaves. In total, this occurred three times over ten days. At the end of the experiment, the part of plants that were above ground were removed from the soil, and the fresh weight, dry weight, and root length were measured for fifty greenhouse plants (treatment and control groups). In the field, the plant height, plant width, stem diameter, and fruit size of thirty plants was measured (treatment and control groups). The plant growth promotion efficacy was rated using the method described by Abdallah [31]. Each treatment was repeated three times.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) in SPSS 13.0 (SPSS Institute, Chicago, IL). Significant differences between means were compared using Fisher’s protected LSD test at P = 0.05. Differences were considered significant for P < 0.05.

Ethics Statement

No specific permissions were required to use the locations in this study. We confirm that the location is not privately-owned or protected in any way. No specific permits were required for the field studies described. We confirm that the field studies did not involve endangered or protected species.

Results

Identification and characterization of NKG-1

We isolated six bacterial strains that colonized with clear zones. Among those six strains, NKG-1 had the highest antimicrobial activity against Rhodotorula rubra; therefore, we focused further investigation on NKG-1.

We first studied the morphological characteristics of NKG-1. NKG-1 colonies on LB plates were thin flat, white, opaque, and round with smooth edges. The strain is Gram-positive and scanning electron microscopy showed short rod-like morphology with cells 0.6–0.9 × 2.1–3.2 μm (Fig 1). Colonies were smooth on LB medium and wrinkled on NA or PDA medium. NKG-1 was positive for V-P detection, starch hydrolysis, and esculin hydrolysis. The strain could utilize citrate, urea, tyrosine, xylose, dextrose, glucose, fructose, mannitol, and galactose (Table 1). NKG-1 was characterized taxonomically using both physiological and biochemical tests; all tests indicated that NKG-1 is closely related to Bacillus methylotrophicus. To further classify NKG-1, we sequenced part of its 16S rDNA sequence. We obtained a 1347-bp amplification fragment of 16s rDNA by PCR (GenBank accession number KX518746). We compared this sequence with others in the GenBank database, aligned the 16S rDNA sequences with several Bacillus sp. strains, and constructed a phylogenetic tree (Fig 2). The results were consistent with those based on morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics. The phylogenetic tree clearly showed that strain NKG-1 belongs to the Bacillus methylotrophicus branch and is similar to strains CKAM, BC79, MER, and R1B with 99.77%, 95.86%, 95.13%, and 94.33% similarities, respectively.

Fig 1. Scanning electron micrographs of B. methylotrophicus strain NKG-1.

Fig 1

Open in a new tab

(A) Gram-positive staining of NKG-1; scale bar 10.0 μm; (B) Gram-positive staining of NKG-1, scale bar 2.0 μm.

Table 1. Morphological, biochemical, and physiological characterization of NKG-1.

Physiochemical indices Characteristics
Morphological characteristics:
Colony Morphology thin flat, white color, opaque, round, smooth edge
Gram stain +
Spore shape/position short rod-like /central
Physiological characteristics:
Growth in NaCl at concentration (2.5–8.5%) +
Growth at different temperature (20–40°C) +
Growth at different pH (5.5–9.5) +
Biochemical tests:
Indole production _ Arabinose _
Methyl red _ Xylose +
Hydrogen sulfide production + Glucose +
Nitrate reduction + Dextrose +
Starch hydrolysis + Fructose +
Citrate utilization + Trehalose _
Urea utilization + Galactose _
Tyrosine utilization + Lactose +
Voges Proskauer (V-P) detection + Glycerol +
Mannitol + — —
Open in a new tab

Fig 2. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rDNA gene sequences from related species of the genus Bacillus constructed using the neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates.

Fig 2

Open in a new tab

Branch length is indicated at each node.

In vitro screening of antagonistic bacterial activity

The results show that NKG-1 fermentation could inhibit the growth of R. rubra with an inhibition diameter of 34 mm. To further test the antagonistic activity of NKG-1, we subjected 13 fungal pathogens to plate confrontation tests (S1 Fig). NKG-1 showed good inhibition (>80%) towards Botryosphaeria dothidea, Phyllosticta ampelicide, Valsa ceratosperma, and Botrytis cinerea (inhibition zone diameters of 5.7 mm, 5.7 mm, 6.0 mm, and 7.3mm, respectively; Table 2). NKG-1 also inhibited Pyricularia oryzae, Gloeosporium capsici, Fusarium graminearum, and Colletotrichum lagenarium by >70%. In general, NKG-1 showed strong antagonistic activity across a broad spectrum (Table 2).

Table 2. Inhibition diameter of NKG-1 against 13 pathogens in vitro.

Pathogen Control diameter (mm) Inhibition diameter (mm) Inhibitionratio (%)
Botryosphaeria dothidea 85 5.7 ± 0.58 93.33 ± 0.68a
Phyllosticta ampelicide 78 5.7 ± 0.58 92.74 ± 0.74a
Valsa ceratosperma 75 6.0 ± 0.01 92.00 ± 0.60a
Botrytis cinerea 40 7.3 ± 0.58 81.67 ± 1.44b
Pyricularia oryzae 48 9.7 ± 0.12 79.86 ± 2.41bc
Gloeosporium capsici 46 11.0 ± 2.65 76.09 ± 5.75cd
Fusarium graminearum 63 15.3 ± 1.15 75.66 ± 1.84cd
Colletotrichum lagenarium 29 8.0 ± 1.00 72.41 ± 3.45d
Fulvia fulva 32 1.20 ± 1.00 62.35 ± 3.13e
Alternaria alternata. 29 11.0 ± 0.02 62.07 ± 0.40e
Rhizoctonia cerealis 35 13.7 ± 0.58 60.95 ± 1.65e
Fusarium oxysporum 47 15.3 ± 1.15 54.90 ± 3.39f
Bipolaris maydis 43 20.0 ± 1.00 53.49 ± 2.33f
Open in a new tab

Values are the mean of three replicates. Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) followed by the same letters in each column are not significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Fisher’s protected least significance test.

Capability of NKG-1 for disease control in a greenhouse setting

We evaluated the efficiency of NKG-1 for controlling Botrytis cinerea when applied as a preventive spray. We observed a difference in virulence between the control and treatment groups (tomatoes) in both experiments. Results from the mycelial inoculation experiment (25°C, 3 days) revealed Botrytis cinerea infection on tomato leaves. Pathogenicity tests showed that NKG-1 prevented pathogen outbreaks on detached leaves. Control leaves exhibited yellowness and necrotic spots after incubation at 25°C for 3 days; however, treated leaves, which still became yellow, did not have necrotic spots after incubation at 25°C for 5 days (Fig 3). Plant disease was lower in the treatment group (40%) than the control group (100%); thus, NKG-1 decreased Botrytis cinerea infection by 60%. On infected leaves, the average lesion diameter was 1.38 ± 0.171 mm in the control group and 0.78 ± 0.155 mm in the treatment group; this difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). We can conclude that NKG-1 is effective at controlling Botrytis cinerea infection in the field; this is consistent with in vitro results.

Fig 3. Test of Botrytis cinerea pathogenicity on detached tomato leaves over 5 days.

Fig 3

Open in a new tab

(A) tomato leaves were inoculated with Botrytis cinerea and incubated at 25°C as a control; (B) tomato leaves were inoculated with Botrytis cinerea after being sprayed with B. methylotrophicus NKG-1 fermentation broth (1.0×107 CFU/mL, from 25°C culture).

NKG-1 promotes the growth of tomato plants

The ability of NKG-1 to promote the growth of tomato plants was tested in greenhouse and field conditions. In the greenhouse, root irritation with 100× and 200× NKG-1 fermentation broth yielded plant heights of 28.23 cm and 27.86 cm, respectively; this corresponded to increases of 12.5% and 11%, respectively, compared with the control (25.09 cm) (Fig 4). Increases in root length (57.7%) and fresh weight (27.4%) were also observed with 100× NKG-1 fermentation broth compared with the control (Table 3). Similar results were observed in the field: root irrigation with 100× and 200× NKG-1 fermentation broth yielded plant heights of 227.03 and 217.16 cm, representing increases of 14.7% and 10.15%, respectively, compared with the control (197.90 cm) (Fig 5). Increased stem diameter (12.7%), crown width (16.3%), and maximum fruit diameter (11.5%) were also observed following treatment with 100× NKG-1 fermentation broth compared with the control (Table 3).

Fig 4. Effect of B. methylotrophicus NKG-1 fermentation broth on the development of roots and whole tomato seedlings in a greenhouse with five irrigation events during 2 months.

Fig 4

Open in a new tab

(A) effect on root development. (B) effect on whole plant development.

Table 3. Effect of NKG-1 root irrigation on tomato plant growth in greenhouse and field conditions.

Greenhouse Field
Treatment Plant height (cm) Root length (cm) Plant fresh weight (g) Plant height (cm) Stem diameter (cm) Crown width (cm) Max diameter of fruits (cm)
Control 25.09 ± 0.53a 3.312 ± 0.86a 1.46 ± 0.48b 197.90 ± 18.53a 3.78 ± 0.82a 61.47 ± 9.41a 3.04 ± 0.34a
NKG-1(100×) 28.23 ± 0.32b 5.22 ± 0.41b 1.86 ± 0.24b 227.03 ± 7.49b 4.26 ± 0.47b 71.49 ± 9.64b 3.39 ± 0.18b
NKG-1(200×) 27.86 ± 0.65b 5.19 ± 0.62b 1.84 ± 0.51b 217.16 ± 7.00b 4.53 ± 0.49b 75.57 ± 8.46b 3.47 ± 0.23b
Open in a new tab

Data in the table are Mean ± SEM by three replicates. Values followed by different letters in each column are significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Fisher’s protected least significance test.

Fig 5. Promotion of tomato plant growth in the field by B. methylotrophicus strain NKG-1.

Fig 5

Open in a new tab

(A) and (D) tomato seeding plants without any treatment over 3 months (control); (B) and (E) tomato seeding plants after root irrigation and spraying with 100× diluted broth over 3 months; and (C) and (F) tomato seeding plants after root irrigation and spraying with 200× diluted broth over 3 months.

Discussion

Different approaches to plant pathogen control have been exhaustively studied. Biological control agents can be an effective approach to plant disease management, and, unlike synthetic compounds that can be toxic to human and other non-target species, have safe active ingredients that can be adsorbed onto soil colloids [32, 33]. Bacillus sp. are typical inhabitants of the rhizosphere and are commonly present on the soil surface [34]. Most strains of Bacillus sp. that are antagonistic towards fungi have been isolated from soil. Bacillus sp. have biocontrol capabilities, which have been extensively studied and involve cell wall degrading enzymes and antibiotics, as well as active plant resistance by production of molecules that are sensed by plants [8, 9].

Substances produced by Bacillus sp. effectively limit normal mycelium growth and spore germination. Many strains of Bacillus sp. have been applied as biological control products for plant protection in agriculture, particularly B. subtilis and B. licheniformis [35, 36]. However, few B. methylotrophicus strains have been explored for biocontrol. B. methylotrophicus strain BC79 has shown biocontrol against rice blast [22], and is an effective biocontrol agent for bacterial tomato wilt [21]. The novel strain in our study has a wider range of fungal antagonism, including 13 tested fungal pathogens. There are additional beneficial functions beyond biocontrol, including P-solubilization (CKAM strain) [37], the potential to degrade ferulic acid and impact antioxidant and rhizospheric enzymatic activates (CSY-F1 strain) [24], and the capability for efficient heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification (L7 strain) [38].

PGPR is an indispensable part of rhizosphere biota that, when grown in association with host plants, can stimulate the growth of the host. Successful rhizobacteria are highly adaptable to a wide variety of environments and typically exhibit the function of plant promotion resulting in faster growth rates than normal plants. These PGPR bacteria are considered a significant factor in agricultural management practices. The potential for PGPR application in agriculture is steadily increasing, as it is an attractive way to potentially replace chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and other supplements [39]. These rhizosphere microorganisms likely produce large quantities of growth-promoting substances that indirectly influence plant morphology. Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis strains are the most promising candidates for indirect stimulation [40]. Only the CKAM and H8 strains of B. methylotrophicus have shown plant growth-promoting properties [22].

This study is the first report regarding the pathogen antagonism and plant growth-promoting potential of B. methylotrophicus NKG-1, which was isolated from the P. koraiensis rhizosphere of mountainous volcanic soil. The rhizosphere of healthy pine trees in areas impacted by soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi could provide a feasible source material for isolating microorganisms with antagonistic abilities. We identified NKG-1 using morphological, biochemical, and rDNA gene analyses. The utilization of citrate by NKG-1 distinguishes it from strain BC-79, which cannot utilize citrate [22]. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed the identity of NKG-1; a BLASTn search of GenBank 16S rDNA sequences indicated that NKG-1 belongs to Bacillus methylotrophicus and shows similarities to strains CKAM, BC79, MER, and R1B (99.77%, 95.86%, 95.13%, and 94.33%, respectively). Despite the 99.77% similarity to strain CKAM, NKG-1 and CKAM are functionally different. CKAM is mainly used for P-solubilization [37]. The in vitro prescreening test on NKG-1 showed significant antifungal activities against Botryosphaeria dothidea, Phyllosticta ampelicide, Valsa ceratosperma, and Botrytis cinerea (>80% inhibition ratio; Table 2). When applied in a preventive spray to control Botrytis cinerea on tomato leaves, the biocontrol efficacy was 60% (Fig 3). NKG-1 also promoted growth of tomato seedlings in greenhouse and field conditions (Figs 4 and 5). Although there are many Bacillus strains with similar functions (i.e., biocontrol and promotion of plant growth), most do not show these traits in both greenhouse and field conditions; thus, NKG-1 could be a potential candidate for use as a biofertilizer or biocontrol agent.

Conclusions

NKG-1 was isolated from the rhizosphere of a P. koraiensis sample from a dormant volcano in southern China. We identified this strain as Bacillus methylotrophicus based on morphological, biochemical, physiological, and phylogenetic analyses. NKG-1 shows significant antifungal and fertilization activities when applied to tomato plants. It is one of only a few B. methylotrophicus strains to display these characteristics in both the greenhouse and the field. Strain NKG-1 could be a potential candidate for use as a biofertilizer or biocontrol agent.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Antibacterial effect of Bacillus methylotrophicus NKG-1 fermentation broth (1.0×107 CFU/mL) on mycelial growth of different fungi after 7 days.

(A) Rhodotorula rubra, (B) Botryosphaeria dothid, (C) Phyllosticta ampelicide, (D) Valsa ceratosperma, (E) Botrytis cinerea, (F) Pyricularia oryzae, (G) Gloeosporium capsici, (H) Fusarium graminearum, (I) Colletotrichum lagenarium, (J) Fulvia fulva, (K) Alternaria alternata, (M) Rhizoctonia cerealis, (N) Fusarium oxysporum, and (O) Bipolaris maydis.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file. (1.5MB, tif)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the native English speaking scientists of Elixigen Company (Huntington Beach, California) for editing our manuscript. We would like to thank Beijing FuPingChuangYuan Agricultural Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) for providing the field experiment area.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation (31401796, 31371985) and the Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest in China (201303025).

References

  • 1.Grissbuhler H, Brenneisen P, Fisher HP. Frontiers in crop production: chemical research objectives. Science. 1982; 217: 505–10. 10.1126/science.217.4559.505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Huang X, Zhang N, Yong X, Yang X, Shen Q. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani damping-off disease in cucumber with Bacillus pumilus SQR-N43. Microbiol Res. 2011; 167: 135–43. 10.1016/j.micres.2011.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yacine G, Omrane T, Amine Y, Nasserdine S, Folrence M, Abdelghani A. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani damping-off and promotion of tomato plant growth by endophytic actinomycetes isolated from native plants of Algerian Sahara. Microbiol Res. 2014; 169: 59–65. 10.1016/j.micres.2013.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Muslim A, Horinouchi H, Hyakumachi M. Biological control of Fusarium wilt of tomato with hypovirulent binucleate Rhizoctonia in greenhouse conditions. Mycoscience. 2003; 44: 77–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.De Cal A, Sztejnberg A, Sabuquillo P, Melgarejo P. Management of Fusarium wilt on melon and watermelon by Penicillium oxalicum. Biol Control. 2009; 46: 267–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Choi O, Kim J, Kim JG, Jeong Y, Moon JS, Park CS, et al. Pyrroloquinoline quinone is a plant growth promotion factor produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens B16. Plant Physiol. 2008; 146(2): 657–668. 10.1104/pp.107.112748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zou C, Li Z, Yu D. 2010. Bacillus megaterium Strain XTBG34 promotes plant growth by producing 2-Pentylfuran. J Microbiol. 2010; 48(4): 460–466. 10.1007/s12275-010-0068-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bloemberg Guido V and Lugtenberg Ben JJ. Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria. Curr Opin in Plant Biol. 2001; 4(4): 343–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Koumoutsi A, Chen XH, Henne A, Liesegang H, Hitzeroth G, Franke P, et al. Structural and functional characterization of gene clusters directing nonribosomal synthesis of bioactive cyclic lipopeptides in Bacillus amyloliquefacies strain FZB42. J Bacteriol. 2004; 186:1084–1096. 10.1128/JB.186.4.1084-1096.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marc O, Philippe J. Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 2008; 16(3):115–12. 10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ma Y, Chang ZZ, Zhao JT, Zhou MG. Antifungal activity of Penicillium striatisporum Pst10 and its biocontrol effect on Phytophthora root rot of chilli pepper. Biol Control. 2008; 44:24–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhao QY, Ran W, Wang H, Li X, Shen QR, Shen SY, et al. Biocontrol of Fusarium wilt disease in muskmelon with Bacillus subtilis Y-IVI. Biol Control. 2013; 58:283–292. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ling N, Xue C, Huang QW, Yang XM, Xu YC, Shen QR. Development of a mode of application of bioorganic fertilizer for improving the biocontrol efficacy to Fusarium wilt. Biol Control. 2010; 55: 673–683. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu B, Huang LL, Buchenauer H, Kang ZS. Isolation and partial characterization of an antifungal protein from the endophytic Bacillus subtilis strain EDR4. Pestic Biochem Phy. 2010; 98(2): 305–311. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Joshi S, Bharucha C, Desai AJ.20 08. Desai production of biosurfactant and antifungal compound by fermented food isolate Bacillus subtilis 20B. Bioresource Technol. 2008; 99: 4603–4608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sadeghi A, Hessan AR, Askari H, Aghighi S, Shahidi Bonjar GH. Biological control potential of two Streptomyces isolates on Rhizoctonia solani, the causal agent of damping-off of sugar beet. Pakistan J Biol Sci. 2006; 9: 904–910. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ferreira J, Matthee F, Thomas A. 1991. Biological control of Eutypa lata on grapevineby an antagonistic strain of Bacillus subtilis. Phytopathology. 1991; 81: 283–287. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Touré Y, Ongena M, Jacques P, Guiro A, Thonart P. Role of lipopeptides produced by Bacillus subtilis GA1 in the reduction of grey mould disease caused by Botrytis cinerea on apple. J Appl Microbiol. 2004; 96(5): 1151–1160. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02252.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Leelasuphakul W, Hemmanee P, Chuenchitt S. 20 08. Growth inhibitory properties of Bacillus subtilis strains and their metabolites against the green mold pathogen (Penicillium digitatum Sacc.) of citrus fruit. Postharvest Biol Tec. 2008; 48: 113–121. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Meschke H, Schrempf H. Streptomyces lividans inhibits the proliferation of the fungus Verticillium dahliae on seeds and roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Microb Biotechnol. 2010; 3: 428–43. 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00165.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Almoneafy AA, Xie GL, Tian WX, Xu LH, Zhang GQ, Ibrahim M. 2012. Characterization and evaluation of Bacillus isolates for their potential plant growth and biocontrol activities against tomato bacterial wilt. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012; 11(28): 7193–7201. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shan HY, Zhao MM, Chen DX, Cheng JL, Li J, Feng ZZ, et al. Biocontrol of rice blast by the phenaminomethylacetic acid producer Bacillus methylotrophicus strain BC79. Crop Prot. 2013; 44: 29–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chandankere R, Yao J, Choi MMF, Masakorala K, Chan Y. An efficient biosurfactant-producing and crude-oil emulsifying bacterium Bacillus methylotrophicus USTBa isolated from petroleum reservoir. Biochem Eng J. 2013; 74: 46–53 [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang Y, Wang XJ, Chen SY, Guo LY, Song ML, Feng H, et al. 2015. Bacillus methylotrophicus isolated from the cucumber rhizosphere degrades ferulic acid in soil and affects antioxidant and rhizosphere enzyme activities. Plant Soil. 2015; 392: 309–321. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Garrity G M, Bell J A, Lilburn T G. Taxonomic outline of the prokaryotes Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Springer; New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. Meth Gen Mol Microbiol. 2007; 3: 330–393. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization: In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology P. WashingtonDC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 28: 2731–2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nielsen MN, Sorensen J, Fels J, Christian H. Secondary metabolite and endochitinase dependent antagonism toward plant pathogenic microfungi of Pseudomonas fl uorescens isolates from sugar beet rhizosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998; 64: 3563e3569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xue QY, Chen Y, Li SM, Chen LF, Ding GC, Guo DW, et al. Evaluation of the strain of Acinetobacter and Enterobacter as Potential Biocontrol agents against Ralstonia Wilt of Toamto. Biol Control. 2009; 48(3): 252–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Abdallah RAB, Mokni-Tlili S, Nefzi A, Jabnoun-Khiareddine H, Daami-Temadi M. Biotcontrol of Fusarium wilt and growth promotion of tomato plants using endophytic bacteria isolated from Nicotiana glauca organs. Biol Control. 2006; 97: 80–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Montealegre JR, Reyes R, Perez LM, Herrera R, Silva P,Besoain X. Selection of bioantagonistic bacteria to be used in biological control of Rhizoctonia solani in tomato. Electron. J Biotechnol. 2003; 6: 115–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Naureen Z, Price AH, Hafeez FY, Roberts MR. Identification of rice blast disease suppressing bacterial strains from the rhizosphere of rice grown in Pakistan. Crop Prot. 2009; 28: 1052–1060. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chaves JQ, Pires ES, Vivoni AM. Genetic diversity,antimicrobial resistance and toxigenic profiles of Bacillus cereus isolated from food in Brazil over three decades. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011; 147: 12–16. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.02.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cavaglieri L, Orlando J, Rodriguez MI, Chulze S, Etcheverry M. Biocontrol of Bacillus subtilis against Fusarium verticillioides in vitro and at the maize root level. Res Microbiol. 2005; 156:748–754. 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee JP, Lee SW, Kim CS, Son JH, Song JH, LEE KY, et al. Evaluation of formulations of Bacullus licheniformis for the biological control of tomato gray mold casued by Botrytis cinerea. Biol Control. 2006; 37: 329–337. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mehta P, Walia A, Kakkar N, Shirkot CK. Tricalcium phosphate solubilisation by new endophute Bacillus methylotrophicus CKAM isolated from apple root endosphere and its plant growth-promotiong activities. Acta Physiol Plant. 2014; 36: 2033–2045. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang QL, Liu Y, Ai GM, Miao LL, Zheng HY, Liu ZP. The characteristics of a novel heterotrophic mitrification-aerobic denitrification bacterim, Bacillus methylotrophicus strain L7. Bioresource Technol. 2012; 108: 35–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bhattacharyya PN. 2012. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microb Biot. 2012; 28: 1327–1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lucy M,Reed E, Glick BR. Applications of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Anton Leeu Int J G. 2004; 86: 1–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Antibacterial effect of Bacillus methylotrophicus NKG-1 fermentation broth (1.0×107 CFU/mL) on mycelial growth of different fungi after 7 days.

(A) Rhodotorula rubra, (B) Botryosphaeria dothid, (C) Phyllosticta ampelicide, (D) Valsa ceratosperma, (E) Botrytis cinerea, (F) Pyricularia oryzae, (G) Gloeosporium capsici, (H) Fusarium graminearum, (I) Colletotrichum lagenarium, (J) Fulvia fulva, (K) Alternaria alternata, (M) Rhizoctonia cerealis, (N) Fusarium oxysporum, and (O) Bipolaris maydis.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file. (1.5MB, tif)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper.

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES