Abstract
Mycobacterium bovis is the etiologic agent of bovine tuberculosis, a chronic infectious disease, affecting livestock, wild animals, and sometimes humans. We report the draft genome sequence of a Mycobacterium bovis strain isolated from wild boar of spoligotype SB0120 (or BCG-like) also present in wildlife-livestock multi-host systems.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Mycobacterium bovis is the causal agent of bovine tuberculosis (BT), a chronic infectious disease, affecting domestic animal species like cattle, wild animals, and sometimes human beings (1–4). France is an officially BT-free EU member, although every year several outbreaks occur in a few regions of the country (5).
The description of the population of M. bovis circulating in France for the last 35 years highlighted that strains of spoligotype SB0120 (or BCG-like), comprising up to 53 different MIRU-VNTR genotypes (4, 6), are the most common. These genotypes of strains are widespread all over the country but, in the last 10 years, a few specific MLVA-profiles seem to spread in particular regions (7). In Dordogne (southwest of France), the main M. bovis strain isolated from infected animals is SB0120−MLVA 5 3 5 3 9 4 5 6. This strain is present in wildlife-livestock multi-host systems, including wild boar, badgers, roe deer, and cattle (7, 8).
We performed whole-genome sequencing of M. bovis in order to improve the knowledge of the genetic determinants involved in modulation of virulence, spread in multi-host systems and persistence over time. The strain SB0120−MLVA 5 3 5 3 9 4 5 6 was isolated in Dordogne in 2010 from mandibular lymph nodes of a wild boar as described before (7).
The isolate was grown in 10 mL of Middlebrook 7H9 liquid media (Becton-Dickinson, France) supplemented with 10% OADC (oleic albumin dextrose catalase) for 4 weeks. Bacteria were thermalized for 1 h at 80°C and chromosomal DNA was extracted by phenol-chloroform method.
DNA sequencing was performed at Genoscreen (Lille, France) on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), to get 2 × 100 paired-ends sequences for an average coverage of 80×. Sequencing produced 1,929,897 paired-ends reads of 100 bp and 1,844,142 reads after filtering with sickle version 1.33 (9). We performed an alignment between filtered reads and the M. bovis AF2122/97 strain as reference using bowtie2 version 2.2.6 (10). The alignment gave us 3,670,788 reads mapped on the reference corresponding to 97.28% coverage. We then performed de novo assembly using Spades version 3.9.0 (2) on trimmed sequences with a k-mer size of 55. We obtained 135 contigs (the largest one being 205,553 bp) for a total length of 4,295,676 bp (using only contigs larger than 500 bp), a G+C content of 65.55%, and an N50 of 72,210 bp (QUAST version 4.2 [11]). Annotation was performed by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (12) which predicted 3,842 coding DNA sequences (CDS) for 4,073 total genes, 45 tRNAs, and 180 pseudo-genes.
Accession number(s).
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number MINA00000000. The version described in this paper is version MINA01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study the French Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Directorate General for Food (DGAL).
This study was supported by the Fédération de Recherche en Infectiologie de la Région Centre (FéRI), and the Cluster de recherche en Infectiologie de la région Centre.
Footnotes
Citation Branger M, Hauer A, Michelet L, Karoui C, Cochard T, De Cruz K, Henault S, Boschiroli ML, Biet F. 2016. Draft genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis strain D-10-02315 isolated from wild boar. Genome Announc 4(6):e01268-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01268-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Amanfu W. 2006. The situation of tuberculosis and tuberculosis control in animals of economic interest. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 86:330–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cosivi O, Grange JM, Daborn CJ, Raviglione MC, Fujikura T, Cousins D, Robinson RA, Huchzermeyer HF, de Kantor I, Meslin FX. 1998. Zoonotic tuberculosis due to Mycobacterium bovis in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis 4:59–70. doi: 10.3201/eid0401.980108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Frothingham R, Meeker-O’Connell WA. 1998. Genetic diversity in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex based on variable numbers of tandem DNA repeats. Microbiology 144:1189–1196. doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-5-1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bekara ME, Azizi L, Benet JJ, Durand B. 2014. Spatial-temporal variations of bovine tuberculosis incidence in France between 1965 and 2000. Transbound Emerg Dis 36:101–113. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Roring S, Scott A, Brittain D, Walker I, Hewinson G, Neill S, Skuce R. 2002. Development of variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium bovis: Comparison of results with those obtained by using existing exact tandem repeats and spoligotyping. J Clin Microbiol 40:2126–2133. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.6.2126-2133.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hauer A, De Cruz K, Cochard T, Godreuil S, Karoui C, Henault S, Bulach T, Bañuls AL, Biet F, Boschiroli ML. 2015. Genetic evolution of Mycobacterium bovis causing tuberculosis in livestock and wildlife in France since 1978. PLoS One 10:e0117103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hauer A, Michelet L, De Cruz K, Cochard T, Branger M, Karoui C, Henault S, Biet F, Boschiroli ML. 2016. MIRU-VNTR allelic variability depends on Mycobacterium bovis clonal group identity. Infect Genet Evol 45:165–169. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Joshi NA, Fass JN. 2011. Sickle: A sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files vol (version 1.33). https://github.com/najoshi/sickle. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10:R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]