Abstract
Partial nephrectomy is now the preferred surgical option for small renal tumors because it allows nephron preservation without compromising oncologic clearance. Its outcomes depend on the surgeon's ability to continuously identify the edges of the tumor during resection, thus leaving an adequate margin around the tumor without excessive removal of normal parenchyma, as well as keeping a short ischemic time. Folate receptors are highly abundant in the normal kidney, and there is a difference in folate receptor expression between malignant and normal renal tissues. Thus, the use of fluorescent agents that target folate receptors should result in differential fluorescence between the tumor and surrounding parenchyma during partial nephrectomy, which, in turn, helps tumor demarcation for identification and resection. A phase 2 study on the novel use of OTL38 in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is currently in progress in our institution. The outcomes of the first three cases have shown the possible advantages of OTL38 in intraoperative tumor identification before resection and recognition of residual disease in the surrounding parenchyma after resection. The tumors typically appeared dark while the surrounding parenchyma showed brighter fluorescence. Immediately after tumor resection, the margins of all the specimens appeared to have a uniformly bright fluorescence, suggestive of an intact margin of normal renal parenchyma along the plane of excision. The pattern of intraoperative fluorescence correlates well with immunohistochemistry. No OTL38-related adverse effects have been seen among these three patients. We present the outcomes of these three cases, illustrated with intraoperative and immunohistochemistry images.
Keywords: : OTL38, folate-targeted intraoperative fluorescence, partial nephrectomy
Introduction
Both partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for small renal tumors show similar oncologic outcomes.1,2 With increasing evidence showing poorer renal function and negative cardiovascular effects after radical nephrectomy, the role of partial nephrectomy as the first-line surgical option is widely accepted.2,3 Well-performed partial nephrectomies should include two routine criteria: a negative margin without excessive removal of surrounding normal parenchyma and a short warm ischemic time. Various factors have an impact on the outcomes of partial nephrectomy, including surgical approach, surgeons' experience, and the availability of new technologies to improve each critical step during surgery.4,5
Besides three-dimensional laparoscopic vision and added dexterity, the use of robotic assistance in partial nephrectomy has the added advantage of having various imaging and filter systems to possibly help with visual demarcation of tumors from normal renal parenchyma.6,7 One such example is near-infrared fluorescence imaging. It involves the activation of an exogenous fluorescent tracer resulting in light emission in the near-infrared spectrum, which is then captured by a built-in charge-coupled device camera.8,9 The differential fluorescent glow in the tumor and normal renal parenchyma aids tumor excision with a margin and detection of residual tumors in the surgical field. There are many exogenous fluorescent tracers that are suitable for near-infrared fluorescence imaging, with the most widely studied being indocyanine green.8
Folate targeting involves the use of folate analogs to deliver imaging and therapeutic agents to tissues with a high concentration of folate receptors.10 It has been found that folate receptors are highly abundant in the normal kidney, and there is a difference in folate receptor expression between malignant and normal renal tissues.11,12 The use of a folate analog conjugated to a fluorescent tracer during partial nephrectomy may therefore help to identify the local extent of the tumor immediately before surgical excision. The concept of folate-targeted intraoperative fluorescence has been applied effectively in the surgical management of ovarian cancer.13 Folate receptors are highly expressed in ovarian tumors but minimally within normal ovarian tissues, resulting in the intraoperative finding of brightly fluorescent tumors surrounded by normal tissues without fluorescence. In contrast, folate receptors are highly expressed in normal kidneys, but less so within renal tumors. Therefore, the pattern of intraoperative fluorescence in partial nephrectomy may be different from that in ovarian cancer surgery.
We are currently performing a phase 2 nonrandomized study on the novel use of folate-targeted intraoperative fluorescence in renal cancer, and we are reporting the outcomes of the first three cases of partial nephrectomy in this ongoing study.
Materials and Methods
The institutional review board approved this study (protocol number: 1511879268, approval date: December 16, 2015). The entire phase 2 study involves a total of 20 patients in 2 arms, with 10 having localized renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) for robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) and 10 having locally advanced or metastatic RCC for open or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. The main objective is to explore the use of folate-targeted intraoperative fluorescence to identify the margins of resection in RALPN and to identify lymph nodes or other metastases in radical nephrectomy. For the purpose of this article reporting the outcomes of the first three cases of RALPN, we shall elaborate on the study protocol in the RALPN arm. Table 1 illustrates the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Table 1.
Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
---|---|
At least 18 years old | Known anaphylactic or allergic reactions to folate and its analogs |
Proven or suspected diagnosis of cT1-2 RCC by CT assessment | Known sensitivity to fluorescent light |
Scheduled for partial nephrectomy | Renal impairment (baseline GFR below 50 mL/min/1.73 m2) |
Expected survival of at least 3 months | Hepatic disorders (CTCAE version 4 definition ≥ grade 2) |
Good performance status (ECOG ≤1) | Brain metastases |
Negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 24 hours before partial nephrectomy (for females of child-bearing age) | Participation in another investigational drug trial within 30 days before partial nephrectomy |
Willingness to participate after the process of informed consent | Any medical conditions that, in the opinion of the investigators, could potentially jeopardize patient's safety, limit the patient's ability to complete the study, or compromise the objectives of the study |
CTCAE = Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; GFR = glomerular filtration rate; RCC = renal-cell carcinoma.
Within 90 days before surgery, the patients attend a screening visit, during which they give informed consent for the study. Their demographics, height and weight, medical history, and physical examination findings are recorded. Complete blood count, serum electrolyte levels, and renal function are also measured.
On the day of surgery, a single dose of OTL38 (On Target Laboratories LLC., West Lafayette, IN) at 0.025 mg/kg and a single dose of 25 mg diphenhydramine are administered intravenously within 2 hours before skin incision. OTL38 is constructed from folic acid linked by its γ-carboxyl and a short spacer to an indocyanine green-related near-infrared dye termed SO456.14 It targets folate receptor alpha (FRα), which is highly expressed in the kidney. Upon excitation, it emits light in the near-infrared spectrum. During RALPN, the da Vinci© Fluorescence Imaging Vision System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) is used to identify tumor margins with visible and fluorescent light immediately before excision and to identify any residual disease immediately after excision. Video and still images are taken in visible and fluorescent light immediately before and after excision. Upon excision, the tumor specimen is sent to the pathologist for inking and sectioning into 5-mm-thick slices for macroscopic assessment of the margin status. Again, video and still images of the tumor specimen in visible and fluorescent lights are taken.
At the end of surgery, the surgeon completes a questionnaire describing the usefulness of folate-targeted intraoperative fluorescence for tumor identification and excision. A coinvestigator, who is a blinded surgeon uninvolved with the case, views the visible and fluorescent light images and completes a questionnaire to assess interobserver agreement. Any adverse effects related to the use of OTL38, such as hypersensitivity or injection site inflammatory reactions, are noted.
Postoperatively, the patients are monitored as per standard clinical practice. Serial assessments with complete blood counts, serum electrolytes, and renal functions are performed. A review visit at 1 month after surgery provides an eventual assessment of surgical outcomes and identifies any delayed adverse effects from the use of OTL38. The final histopathology of the tumor specimen is also noted. Figure 1 summarizes the study protocol on the use of OTL38 in RALPN.
The primary objective of this study is to explore the use of OTL38 during RALPN and the pattern of fluorescence in the tumor and surrounding parenchyma. The secondary objectives include correlation between intraoperative tumor fluorescence and FRα status of tumor specimens by immunohistochemistry, assessment of the usefulness of OTL38 in intraoperative identification of tumor margins by the operating surgeon, assessment of any interobserver variations by a blinded coinvestigator, and assessment of the clinical safety of OTL38 among RCC patients up to 1 month after surgery.
Results
So far, three patients have completed treatment and follow-up as per study protocol in the RALPN arm in this ongoing study.
All three patients were men and ranged from 50 to 70 years of age. They presented with incidental small renal masses 15 to 22 mm in largest diameter. Figure 2 shows the transverse and coronal CT images representative of their renal masses. All patients received OTL38 and underwent RALPN as per study protocol. Fluorescent lights were used to identify tumor margins immediately before excision and to look for possible residual disease in the resection bed immediately after excision. All tumors were excised by sharp dissection with scissors under visible light and near-infrared imaging. A two-layered renorrhaphy was routinely performed for hemostasis and repair of the defect after excision in all three patients. The mean length of hospital stay was 2 days (range: 1–3 days).
The pattern of intraoperative fluorescence among all three patients was similar. All renal tumors did not appear fluorescent, whereas the surrounding parenchyma showed mild fluorescence in the first patient and bright fluorescence in the second and third patients. Figure 3 shows the pattern of intraoperative fluorescence in the patients.
The complete lack of fluorescence in the renal tumors surrounded by fluorescent parenchyma served as a good indicator for the tumor margins in all the three patients. During excision of the tumors, intermittent switching from visible to fluorescent light also helped in confirming the correct depth of excision. Warm ischemic time, measured from the clamping of the renal arteries to the release of clamps after the first layer of renorrhaphy, ranged from 10 to 16 minutes. The estimated blood loss ranged from 50 to 200 mL.
Immediately after tumor excision, the margin of the specimen appeared to have a uniformly bright fluorescence, suggestive of an intact margin of normal renal parenchyma around the plane of excision. Figure 4 shows the cut surfaces of the tumors under visible and fluorescent light.
Upon histologic examination of the tumor specimens, the first and second patient showed Fuhrman grade 2 clear-cell RCC with uninvolved margins, and the third patient showed Fuhrman grade 2 type 1 papillary RCC with uninvolved margins. Immunohistochemistry showed consistent correlation with the pattern of intraoperative fluorescence in all the three patients. Only 10% to 30% of tumor cells were stained for FRα, but the surrounding renal parenchyma demonstrated strong staining, especially along the luminal surface of the renal tubular epithelium. Figure 5 shows the immunohistochemistry results of the patients.
All the three patients had an uneventful postoperative recovery and did not show any OTL38-related adverse effects up to 1 month after the surgery. There were no significant perioperative changes in serum electrolyte levels and renal function. Table 2 summarizes the demographics and outcomes of our three patients.
Table 2.
Patient | Age (year) | BMI | ECOG | Tumor size (mm) | R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score | Fluorescence in tumor | Fluorescence in parenchyma | Usefulness of OTL38 in tumor identification and excision | Warm ischemic time (minutes) | Estimated blood loss (mL) | OTL38-related adverse effects | Histology | FRα staining in tumor | FRα staining in parenchyma |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 67 | 31.6 | 0 | 22 | 1+1+2+A+2 | Nil | Mild | Yes | 13 | 200 | Nil | Fuhrman grade 2 clear-cell RCC, margins uninvolved | Minimal intensity in <10% tumor cells | Strong |
2 | 70 | 24.2 | 0 | 22 | 1+2+3+P+1 | Nil | Bright | Yes | 16 | 200 | Nil | Fuhrman grade 2 clear-cell RCC, margins uninvolved | Mild intensity in <30% tumor cells | Strong |
3 | 50 | 33.2 | 0 | 15 | 1+1+1+P+1 | Nil | Bright | Yes | 10 | 50 | Nil | Fuhrman grade 2 papillary RCC (type 1), margins uninvolved | Mild intensity in 50% of tumor cells | Strong |
BMI = body mass index.
Discussion
All forms of cancer surgery with the intent to cure should focus on oncologic clearance, and partial nephrectomy for renal tumors is no exception. Partial nephrectomy is advantageous over radical nephrectomy for small renal tumors because of nephron preservation, yet it remains noninferior in terms of oncologic outcomes.1,2 Various modalities are used to increase the negative margin rates during partial nephrectomy. These include intraoperative imaging such as ultrasonography, pathologic assessments such as frozen section, and the use of fluorescent tracers such as indocyanine green to pinpoint the tumor edge.7,9,15–19 When used singly or in combination, these modalities provide intraoperative assurance to the surgeon that tumor resection is complete and residual disease is unlikely. The ability to continuously and accurately identify the tumor margin during partial nephrectomy also reduces unnecessary pauses to confirm the plane of resection, thus potentially avoiding prolonged arterial clamping and warm ischemia. Warm ischemic time has a direct impact on postoperative renal function which, in turn, correlates with cardiovascular complications and overall survival.20
Advances in biomolecular research have also contributed to improved outcomes of cancer surgery. The expressions of FRα in various human cancer and normal tissues have been delineated.11,12 There are differences in expression between cancer and normal tissues in several organs, including ovary and kidney. Such discrepancies in FRα expression can be exploited clinically, such that folate analogs conjugated to various contrast agents show different degrees of binding to normal and malignant tissues. The recent use of folate-targeted intraoperative fluorescence with OTL38 among patients with ovarian cancer has shown encouraging results, allowing resection of an additional 29% of malignant lesions that were previously unidentifiable by inspection or palpation.13 Ovarian tumors and metastatic deposits appeared fluorescent and were easily located during surgery.
In the human kidney, FRα expression reaches 100% at the apical surface of the proximal tubules, where it plays the physiologic role of folate reabsorption.21 Renal carcinoma, whether in vivo or in established cell lines, shows a lower expression of FRα.11,12 The pattern of intraoperative fluorescence in our three patients appeared to be consistent with the difference in FRα expression in normal and malignant renal tissues and facilitated the identification of the local extents of the tumors. The bright fluorescence along the cut surfaces of the tumors at the end of resection could be intuitively recognized by the surgeon as an indication of adequate margin. While the study is still ongoing, such initial findings seem to indicate that folate-targeted intraoperative fluorescence with OTL38 is feasible and facilitates the recognition and resection of small tumors in partial nephrectomy. Upon completion of the entire phase 2 study, we shall be able to report the negative margin rate, warm ischemic time, and other operative parameters associated with the use of OTL38.
The choice of FRα-targeting fluorescent tracer for partial nephrectomy should be carefully considered. The difference in fluorescence between renal parenchyma and tumor should be as distinct as possible. In our three cases of partial nephrectomy where the tumors had no fluorescence, bright fluorescence in the renal parenchyma would be ideal. We had access to two tracers, namely EC17 and OTL38, and both contain the same folate ligand for binding with FRα. They differ in the fluorochrome, with EC17 carrying fluorescein, which fluoresces with a peak wavelength of 510 nm, and OTL38 carrying indocyanine green, which fluoresces with a peak wavelength of 794 nm.14 Comparison between the two tracers showed that OTL38 has the advantages of deeper tissue penetration, reduced scattering, and reduced autofluorescence. Most importantly, OTL38 fluoresces in the kidneys, whereas EC17 does not.14 Previous experience with EC17 for partial nephrectomy had problems with autofluorescence and poor tissue penetration, and tumor fluorescence was only present in 50% of cases.22 Therefore, OTL38 seemed to be a more suitable tracer.
Immunohistochemistry results from our three patients confirmed significantly lower expression of FRα in tumors than in normal parenchyma. Both the intensity and the density of stains were much lower within tumors, consistent with the observed difference in intraoperative fluorescence between normal and malignant renal tissues. Such immunohistochemistry also concurs with the findings from previous studies using polymerase chain reaction or radioligand binding assay to determine FRα expression in frozen human tissues and established cell lines.11,12 With two of our patients having clear-cell RCC and one having papillary RCC, it seems that both histologic cell types are poor in FRα expression compared with normal renal parenchyma.
Interestingly, while our patients demonstrated poor expression of FRα in the small localized renal tumors, a previous study showed much higher expression of folate receptors in metastatic RCC. Using an imaging agent that consisted of folate conjugated to technetium-99m, 74% of metastatic RCC showed mild to marked uptake.23 The difference in folate receptor expression between small localized renal tumors and metastatic RCC raises the possibility for folate targeting to be used for prognostication in RCC.
Based on the current medical literature, the most common OTL38-related adverse event is hypersensitivity reaction, and its occurrence seems to be dose related.13 We chose the dose of 0.025 mg/kg after reviewing safety and efficacy data from previous studies.13,24 The concurrent administration of an antihistamine agent was intended to further reduce the risk of hypersensitivity reactions among our study patients. There were no OTL38-related adverse events observed in all of our patients for up to a month after the surgery. However, with outcomes from only three patients, we are unable to comment on the clinical safety of OTL38 among patients with renal tumors at the current moment.
Conclusion
The outcomes of the initial three patients seemed encouraging, with easy tumor identification and resection due to the clearly observed difference in intraoperative fluorescence in renal tumors and their surrounding renal parenchyma. We also demonstrated a close correlation between intraoperative fluorescence with OTL38 and FRα staining on immunohistochemistry. As more patients complete the study, we hope to draw more definite conclusions on the use of OTL38 for RALPN, including its intraoperative fluorescence pattern, impact on warm ischemic time and negative margin rate, and adverse effects. We also hope to confirm if these outcomes may be affected by other factors, such as tumor cell types and other patient-dependent variables.
Abbreviations Used
- BMI
body mass index
- CT
computed tomography
- CTCAE
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
- ECOG
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- FRα
folate receptor alpha
- GFR
glomerular filtration rate
- RALPN
robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
- RCC
renal-cell carcinoma
Acknowledgments
This project was funded, in part, with support from the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, funded, in part, by Grant Number UL1TR001108 from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and Clinical and Translational Sciences Award. OTL38 and EC17 were kind gifts from On Target Laboratories LLC.
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
References
- 1.Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, et al. . A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2011;59:543–552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jang HA, Kim JW, Byun SS, et al. . Oncologic and functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in T1b renal cell carcinoma: A multicenter, matched case-control study in Korean patients. Cancer Res Treat 2016;48:612–620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, et al. . Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors—Is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol 2009;181:55–61 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bahler CD, Cary KC, Garg S, et al. . Differentiating reconstructive techniques in partial nephrectomy: A propensity score analysis. Can J Urol 2015;22:7788–7796 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ramirez D, Maurice MJ, Caputo PA, et al. . Predicting complications in partial nephrectomy for T1a tumors: Does approach matter? BJU Int 2016. [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1111/bju.13583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rogers CG, Laungani R, Bhandari A, et al. . Maximizing console surgeon independence during robot-assisted renal surgery by using the Fourth Arm and TilePro. J Endourol 2009;23:115–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Krane LS, Manny TB, Hemal AK. Is near infrared fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green dye useful in robotic partial nephrectomy: A prospective comparative study of 94 patients. Urology 2012;80:110–116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bjurlin MA, McClintock TR, Stifelman MD. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging with intraoperative administration of indocyanine green for robotic partial nephrectomy. Curr Urol Rep 2015;16:20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mitsui Y, Shiina H, Arichi N, et al. . Indocyanine green (ICG)-based fluorescence navigation system for discrimination of kidney cancer from normal parenchyma: Application during partial nephrectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 2012;44:753–759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Low PS, Henne WA, Doorneweerd DD. Discovery and development of folic-acid-based receptor targeting for imaging and therapy of cancer and inflammatory diseases. Acc Chem Res 2008;41:120–129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ross JF, Chaudhuri PK, Ratnam M. Differential regulation of folate receptor isoforms in normal and malignant tissues in vivo and in established cell lines. Physiologic and clinical implications. Cancer 1994;73:2432–2443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Parker N, Turk MJ, Westrick E, et al. . Folate receptor expression in carcinomas and normal tissues determined by a quantitative radioligand binding assay. Anal Biochem 2005;338:284–293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hoogstins CE, Tummers QR, Gaarenstroom KN, et al. . A novel tumor-specific agent for intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging: A translational study in healthy volunteers and patients with ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:2929–2938 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.De Jesus E, Keating JJ, Kularatne SA, et al. . Comparison of folate receptor targeted optical contrast agents for intraoperative molecular imaging. Int J Mol Imaging 2015;2015:469047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kaczmarek BF, Sukumar S, Petros F, et al. . Robotic ultrasound probe for tumor identification in robotic partial nephrectomy: Initial series and outcomes. Int J Urol 2013;20:172–176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Curtiss KM, Ball MW, Gorin MA, et al. . Perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for intrarenal tumors. J Endourol 2015;29:293–296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Venigalla S, Wu G, Miyamoto H. The impact of frozen section analysis during partial nephrectomy on surgical margin status and tumor recurrence: A clinicopathologic study of 433 cases. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2013;11:527–536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tobis S, Knopf JK, Silvers C, et al. . Robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with near infrared fluorescence imaging. J Endourol 2012;26:797–802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Angell JE, Khemees TA, Abaza R. Optimization of near infrared fluorescence tumor localization during robotic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2013;190:1668–1673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al. . Renal function after partial nephrectomy: Effect of warm ischemia relative to quantity and quality of preserved kidney. Urology 2012;79:356–360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Low PS, Kularatne SA. Folate-targeted therapeutic and imaging agents for cancer. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2009;13:256–262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Guzzo TJ, Jiang J, Keating J, et al. . Intraoperative molecular diagnostic imaging can identify renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2016;195:748–755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fisher RE, Siegel BA, Edell SL, et al. . Exploratory study of 99mTc-EC20 imaging for identifying patients with folate receptor-positive solid tumors. J Nucl Med 2008;49:899–906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.van Dam GM, Themelis G, Crane LM, et al. . Intraoperative tumor-specific fluorescence imaging in ovarian cancer by folate receptor-α targeting: First in-human results. Nat Med 2011;17:1315–1319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
References
Cite this article as: Shum CF, Bahler CD, Low PS, Ratliff TL, Kheyfets SV, Natarajan JP, Sandusky GE, Sundaram CP (2016) Novel use of folate-targeted intraoperative fluorescence, OTL38, in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: report of the first three cases, Journal of Endourology Case Reports 2:1, 189–197, DOI: 10.1089/cren.2016.0104.