Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2015 Dec 26;4(2):129–138. doi: 10.1517/21678707.2016.1128322

Prospect and progress of oncolytic viruses for treating peripheral nerve sheath tumors

Slawomir Antoszczyk 1,2, Samuel D Rabkin 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC5111812  NIHMSID: NIHMS797925  PMID: 27867771

Abstract

Introduction

Peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs) are an assorted group of neoplasms originating from neuroectoderm and growing in peripheral nerves. Malignant transformation leads to a poor prognosis and is often lethal. Current treatment of PNSTs is predominantly surgical, which is often incomplete or accompanied by significant loss of function, in conjunction with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, for which the benefits are inconclusive. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) efficiently kill tumor cells while remaining safe for normal tissues, and are a novel antitumor therapy for patients with PNSTs.

Areas covered

Because of the low efficacy of current treatments, new therapies for PNSTs are needed. Pre-clinically, OVs have demonstrated efficacy in treating PNSTs and perineural tumor invasion, as well as safety. We will discuss the various PNSTs and their preclinical models, and the OVs being tested for their treatment, including oncolytic herpes simplex virus (HSV), adenovirus (Ad), and measles virus (MV). OVs can be ‘armed’ to express therapeutic transgenes or combined with other therapeutics to enhance their activity.

Expert opinion

Preclinical testing of OVs in PNST models has demonstrated their therapeutic potential and provided support for clinical translation. Clinical studies with other solid tumors have provided evidence that OVs are safe in patients and efficacious. The recent successful completion of a phase III clinical trial of oncolytic HSV paves the way for oncolytic virotherapy to enter clinical practice.

Keywords: virotherapy, MPNST, HSV, soft tissue sarcoma

1. Introduction To Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors And Oncolytic Viruses

Peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs) are relatively rare neoplasms originating from neuroectoderm and growing in the peripheral nerves, causing pain, reducing nerve function and leading to disability. PNSTs are typically benign, schwannomas and neurofibromas, and sporadic or caused by genetic disorders of the nervous system, such as neurofibromatosis, and are categorized as soft tissue tumors 1, 2. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are very aggressive and characterized by a high mortality rate 3, 4. Benign plexiform neurofibromas (PNF) can transform to a malignant form 5. These are common tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and 2 (NF2) 1. The most recent classification of nerve sheath tumors is summarized in the WHO Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone 6. We will not discuss the rarer PNSTs, such as myxoma, perineurioma, and triton tumors. Carcinoma perineural invasion also involves tumor growth in peripheral nerves and thus has treatment issues that overlap with PNSTs.

Although the idea of using virus infection to induce tumor cell death, virotherapy, has been known more than 100 years 7, the advances in genetic engineering provided new possibilities to modify viruses for safety and efficacy. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) selectively replicate in tumor cells without harming normal tissue, making new infectious virus that can then spread and kill additional tumor cells 7, 8. They can kill tumor cells not only by direct cytopathic effect, oncolysis, but also by indirect mechanisms, such as inducing anti-tumor immune responses or attacking the tumor vasculature 9-11. OVs include those viruses that: (i) have a natural propensity to replicate in tumor cells, i.e. myxoma and Newcastle disease viruses (NDV); (ii) are vaccine strains that have been attenuated, i.e. measles (MV), poliovirus (PV), and vaccinia virus (VV); or (iii) are genetically engineered with mutation/deletions in pathogenic genes, genes required for replication in normal cells, and/or retargeted to tumor cell receptors, i.e. adenovirus (Ad), herpes simples virus (HSV), and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) 12. OVs can be ‘armed’ with therapeutic transgenes, including; immunomodulatory, anti-angiogenic, and cytotoxic genes, that are expressed in the tumor after infection 13, 14. Depending on the tumor type, OVs can be used: (i) as single agents, (ii) in combination with chemo- or/and radio-therapy, or (iii) expressing therapeutic transgenes. During the last two decades, numerous OVs have entered into clinical trials for a large variety of cancers 7, 15. However, there has been only one clinical trial to date reporting OV treatment for PNST, using oncolytic Ad 16. Recently, the first oncolytic virus, talimogene laherparepvec, an oncolytic HSV, was approved by the FDA in the US for the treatment of advanced melanoma 17, 18. Because of this lack of completed clinical trials for PNST, we will focus on OVs that have been explored preclinically for the treatment of PNSTs (Table 1), strategies to improve OV efficacy in PNSTs, safety, and future virotherapy directions.

Table 1. OVs used in PNST pre-clinical models.

Abbreviations: GFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; h, human; IL, interleukin; LacZ, β-galactosidase; NIS, sodium/iodide symporter; pro, promoter; TIMP3, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3; IE4/5, immediate-early gene 4/5.

Oncolytic Virus Genetic Modifications Transgene Drug Combination PNST Model Ref.
oHSV
G47Δ γ34.5Δ, ICP6-, ICP47Δ, LacZ+ MPNST orthotopic sciatic nerve, Transgenic schwannoma, Subcutaneous schwannoma 49, 50, 57, 65
G207 γ34.5Δ, ICP6- Subcutaneous and intraperitoneal human MPNST in athymic mice 52, 54
NV1023 UL56Δ/1 copy of ICP0, ICP4 and γ34.5 Perineural invasion model in sciatic nerve 60, 61
G207 γ34.5Δ, ICP6- Erlotinib Subcutaneous and intraperitoneal: human MPNST in athymic mice 54
rQT3 γ34.5Δ, ICP6- IE4/5pro-TIMP3, ICP6-GFP fusion in ICP6 MPNST xenograft models 55
hrR3 ICP6-, LacZ+ Subcutaneous and intraperitoneal human MPNST in athymic mice 54
oHSV-MDK-34.5 Mdk pro-γ34.5 and ICP6-GFP fusion in ICP6 Subcutaneous human MPNST in athymic mice 56
G47Δ-PF4 γ34.5Δ, ICP6-, ICP47Δ, ICP47pro-Us11 PF4 Subcutaneous MPNST xenograft, MPNST orthotopic sciatic nerve in immunocompetent mice 57
G47Δ-dnFGFR γ34.5Δ, ICP6-, ICP47Δ, ICP47pro-Us11 dnFGFR Subcutaneous MPNST xenograft, MPNST orthotopic sciatic nerve in immunocompetent mice 64
G47Δ-mIL12 γ34.5Δ, ICP6Δ mIL-12 MPNST orthotopic sciatic nerve in immunocompetent mice 65
Other OVs
Ad5/3-D24-GMCSF Ad5/3 fiber, E1A 24-bpΔ, E3Δ hGMCSF doxorubicin, ifosfamide leiomyosarcoma cells in Syrian hamster 74
MV-NIS Edmonston vaccine strain NIS Subcutaneous human MPNST in athymic mice 77
VSV-rp30a Disruption of gene order In vitro human MPNST cell lines 81

2. Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors (PNST) and Perineural Invasion in Cancer

2.1. Schwannoma

Normal Schwann cells form myelin, a protective sheath around peripheral nerves. Schwannomas, the most common PNST in adults and comprised of abnormal Schwann-like cells, are benign, slow-growing, circumscribed, encapsulated, solitary, and non-infiltrating tumors 2, 19. NF2 patients develop schwannomas, often multiple, in cranial, spinal, and peripheral nerves, with bilateral vestibular schwannomas a hallmark 2, 19. NF2 is an autosomal dominant disease (affects about 1:25000 births) caused by inactivating mutations of the NF2 tumor suppressor gene located on chromosome 22q12, and characterized by the development of nervous system tumors, ocular abnormalities, and skin tumors 20. The NF2 gene, encoding merlin (moesin-ezrin-radixin-like protein), is also mutated or lost in most sporadic schwannomas 21, 22. Schwannomas are often asymptomatic, although vestibular schwannomas often lead to hearing loss, and can usually be treated with surgical resection 2, 20. A broader understanding of the molecular mechanism of NF2 pathogenesis should lead to new therapies, with a number of downstream effectors of merlin being tested in clinical trials, i.e.: erlotinib (Her-1/EGFR inhibitor), lapatinib (Her-2/EGFR inhibitor), and everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) 23, 24. While the targeted therapies are promising, they have not been curative, so virotherapy is an attractive approach.

2.2. Neurofibroma

Neurofibromas are benign PNSTs arising from Schwann cell precursors that include fibroblasts, mast cells, and distinct from schwannomas, a matrix of collagen fibers 2, 5. Typically they occur sporadically, however approximately 10% are associated with NF1, where they are a diagnostic criteria 25. NF1 is a frequently occurring autosomal dominant genetic disease (affects about 1:3500 births), caused by mutations in the NF1 gene located on chromosomal segment 17q11.2 and encoding neurofibromin 26. Neurofibromin contains a Ras-GTPase activating protein (Ras-GAP) domain that negatively regulates Ras activity, so that NF1 is a member of the RASopathy cancer predisposing syndromes 27. Unlike schwannoma, neurofibromas are not encapsulated and infiltrate between the nerve fascicles. There are three subtypes of neurofibroma based on their location and appearance: (i) localized cutaneous or dermal neurofibromas, which are the most common, appear at puberty and grow from small nerves in the skin or just under the skin. They have limited growth, remaining benign throughout life, and do not transform into malignant PNSTs 5; (ii) diffuse or subcutaneous neurofibromas are typically located within the subcutaneous tissues of the head and neck, are often pigmented or with melanocytic differentiation 25, 28, and in NF1 are associated with internal neurofibroma tumor burden and mortality 29, 30; and (iii) plexiform neurofibromas (PNF) are usually congenital, occurring in about a third of NF1 patients, and present anywhere in the body but often internal where they can remain aysmptomatic 26. They involve multiple nerve fascicle trunks and infiltrate surrounding tissue 25. Importantly, PNFs can undergo malignant transformation and progress to MPNST, which occurs in about 5-10% of cases 5, 31, 32. PNFs are typically debulked by surgery when indicated, but this can be associated with nerve damage and hemorrhage, and is often incomplete 5, 33. Based on our understanding of neurofibromin, a small phase II clinical trial examined imatinib mesylate (Gleevec), a kinase inhibitor, to treat PNF 34.

2.3. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST)

MPNST is a soft-tissue sarcoma arising from peripheral nerves or benign PNSTs that displays nerve sheath differentiation 25, 35. They account for about 10% of soft tissue sarcomas, but half arise in NF1 patients. There are histological and clinical differences between sporadic and NF1-associated MPNSTs 33, 36, although a recent meta-analysis suggested that the survival differences have been converging in the last decade 37. MPNST frequently occurs in the extremities, often in major nerve trunks like the sciatic nerve 35. Like other malignancies, metastasis may also occur, often to the lung, liver, brain, soft tissue, bone, regional lymph nodes and retroperitoneum 32. In NF1, loss-of-heterozygosity of NF1 occurs in over 90% of tumors 38, with tumors having constitutively activated RAS and downstream activation of the Akt and MAPK pathways 39. However, the complex karyotypes in MPNSTs suggests that additional genetic alterations, such as in p53, CDKN2A, CDK4, contribute to malignancy 35. Surgical resection is the main treatment option for MPNST, however it is often incomplete, with a local recurrences ranging up to 65% depending on the tumor location, and associated with potentially significant loss of function 33, 40. Radiotherapy is recommended for high-grade lesions when surgery is not possible or incomplete, but hasn't been shown to improve survival 33, 40. Adjuvant chemotherapy, ifosfamide and doxorubicin, may have some activity in pediatric patients and non-NF1 patients 40, 41. The long-term survival of MPNST patients is poor, around 50% at 5 years 37, 40, 41, so there is a critical need for novel therapeutic approaches.

2.4. Perineural invasion in cancer

Perineural invasion (PNI), the presence of tumor cells within any of the layers of the nerve sheath, is a route of metastasis distinct from vascular or lymphatic dissemination 42. It is very common and often the typical route of metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (∼80%), prostate (∼80%), gastric (∼50%), and colorectal cancers (∼30%), and almost all pancreatic tumors 42-44. PNI is an independent prognostic factor in these tumors, with 5 year survival often decreased by half, and is also associated with severe pain, especially in pancreatic cancer 42, 43, 45. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of PNI is lagging and it is still unclear how tumor cells penetrate the nerve sheath and layers of collagen and basement membrane, or why some carcinomas have a penchant for PNI. The lack of targeted treatments and poor prognosis for PNI makes this an important target for novel therapies and potentially OVs.

3. Oncolytic Viruses

3.1. Herpes simplex virus (HSV)

HSV-1 is an enveloped virus with a 152 kb double-stranded DNA genome encoding about 84 genes 46. Viral glycoproteins in the envelope bind to host attachment factors on the cell surface (heparin sulfate, nectin-1 (PVRL1), PILRα, and HVEM (TNFRSF14)) and induce membrane fusion 46. This can impact cancer cell susceptibility, for example HVEM is not expressed on most MPNST cell lines, including sensitive cells, while the levels of nectin-1 expression correlate with virus yields 47. In permissive cells, the HSV replication cycle is usually completed in less than 24 hr, and cells release viral progeny ready to infect adjacent cells. HSV is a neurotropic virus that can invade the nervous system and infect neural cells. HSV can be genetically engineered to mutate/delete viral genes that confer selective replication in tumor cells and attenuate neurovirulence, make them oncolytic. For example: (i) the thymidine kinase (TK) and ribonucleotide reductase (ICP6) genes are involved in nucleotide metabolism and necessary for virus replication in nondividing cells, but not in tumor cells; and (ii) γ34.5 is a major determinant of HSV pathogenicity, so that deletions of γ34.5 significantly reduce neurovirulence permitting treatment of nervous system tumors 48.

3.2. Oncolytic HSV (oHSV)

A number of oHSVs with different mutations/deletions (ICP6, γ34.5) have been tested in a variety of PNST models (Table 1). G47Δ, a third generation oHSV (ICP6-, γ34.5Δ, ICP47Δ), was examined in a number of human xenograft and mouse transgenic schwannoma models 49, 50. In a NF2 transgenic model, spontaneous subcutaneous schwannomas were treated with a single intratumoral injection of G47Δ after MR imaging to identify the tumors 49. This led to a decrease in tumor volume within 2 weeks in G47Δ-treated tumors, however, in some cases control-treated tumors also regressed. This is an issue not only with the mouse models, but also in human patients 51, and confounds both preclinical and clinical studies of benign tumors with variable growth rates. In addition, it took about 18 months for the transgenic schwannomas to become apparent, making treatment studies difficult. To get around this problem, human schwannoma xenografts were generated by subcutaneous implantation of schwannoma tissue from patients with NF2 or schwannomatosis in immunocompromised mice 49. These tumors were histologically schwannomas and susceptible to G47Δ infection and replication 49. Treatment with two doses of G47Δ resulted in a reduction in tumor volume, while the vehicle-treated tumors continued to grow 49. In a separate study, subcutaneous tumors were established in nude mice with a human immortalized schwannoma cell line HEI193 or a mouse line (NF2S-1), and treated two successive times with G47Δ 50. Both tumors showed significant inhibition of tumor growth or regression compared with control animals, however, the NF2S-1 tumors regrew at about 7 weeks after treatment 50. These positive results in a variety of schwannoma models strongly support the use of oHSV for the treatment of schwannomas.

MPNST is a lethal tumor and there are more MPNST cell lines available as models than for benign PNSTs, making it a more frequent target for OV therapy. Initial studies in vitro, showed that a set of human MPNST cell lines were sensitive to oHSV G207 and hrR3 (Table 1), regardless of Ras activation, whereas normal human Schwann cells were not permissive to virus replication 52. In contrast, the susceptibility of mouse MPNST cells isolated from transgenic mouse tumors to G207 was dependent upon elevated levels of Ras activation 53. Both G207 and hrR3 were able to inhibit tumor growth and survival after intraperitoneal injection of mice bearing intraperitoneal xenografts of human STS26T MPNST 54. rQLuc, similar to G207, but expressing luciferase (Table 1), was efficacious in subcutaneous xenografts of STS26T and S462.TY after intratumoral injection 55. Luciferase expression permits non-invasive monitoring of virus spread using bioluminescence imaging.

Transcriptionally-targeting of oHSV is a way to drive replication selectively in tumor cells 48. Midkine (MDK) is overexpressed in MPNST cells compared to fibroblasts and Schwann cells 56 and thus the MDK promoter should drive MPNST-specific transcription. To enhance oHSV replication, γ34.5 was placed under the MDK promoter, generating oHSV-MDK-34.5 (Table 1) 56. oHSV-MDK-34.5 had increased viral replication and cytotoxicity in human STS26T MPNST cells in vitro, and inhibited tumor growth and increased survival in subcutaneous xenografts compared with the control virus oHSV-MDK 56.

Recently, a new orthotopic MPNST model was developed by implantation of mouse NF1 transgenic MPNST cell lines or human NF1 MPNST stem-like cells (MSLCs) into the sciatic nerves of immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice, respectively 57. In this model, mice develop progressive hind limb deficits, which can be quantified to evaluate treatment efficacy. Neurologic deficits are apparent prior to palpable tumors, which provides an indication that the tumor is established and growing and thus suitable for treatment. MSLCs were isolated from an established human MPNST cell line, S462, which could self-renew, had increased expression of stem cell markers, could differentiate into cells from multiple lineages, and were more tumorigenic 58. About a third of mice bearing human MSLC-derived tumors treated with a single low dose intratumoral injection of only 2×105 plaque forming units (pfu) of G47Δ were long-term survivors, with no evidence of tumor and limited neurologic deficit, in contrast to mock-treated mice which all succumbed to tumor growth 57. In the immunocompetent mouse MPNST model, a single dose of G47Δ significantly delayed tumor growth, improved neurologic score, and significantly extended survival compared with control, with the 35% long-term survivors lacking macroscopically detectable tumor or ultrastructural abnormalities 57. Therefore, oHSV has been shown to be very effective in treating PNSTs, both benign schwannomas and malignant MPNSTs.

PNI can be modeled by tumor cell implantation into sciatic nerves. The first description of oHSV treatment in such a model was the demonstration that a single intratumoral injection of G207 could extend the survival of mice bearing tumors after implantation of human neuroblastoma IMR32 cells into the sciatic nerve 59. Tumors were similarly established in the sciatic nerve with human carcinoma cell lines from pancreatic (MiaPaCa2), squamous cell (QLL2), and prostate (PC3, DU145) cancers, and treated with oHSV NV1023 (Table 1) 60, 61. While all saline-treated mice developed complete hindlimb paralysis, most NV1023-treated mice had preserved nerve function and significant tumor regression 60, 61. A similar oHSV, NV1020, has been in clinical trial for metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver 62.

3.3. oHSV expressing therapeutic transgenes

While OVs are effective therapeutic agents, their activity can be enhanced by ‘arming’ them with therapeutic transgenes. Expression of transgenes in the tumor can target uninfected tumor cells and normal cells and extracellular matrix of the tumor microenvironment 14, 63. A number of different transgenes have been inserted into oHSV and examined in MPNST models, including those encoding antiangiogenic factors, immunomodulatory cytokines, receptor decoys, and proteinase inhibitors 48. rQT3 encodes human tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3) (Table 1), blocking the activity of matrix metalloproteinases, which promote tumor invasion and are expressed in MPNST cells 55. rQT3 was much more effective than G207 or rQLuc at inhibiting MPNST STS26T and S462.TY tumor growth 55. G47Δ expressing anti-angiogenic factors platelet factor 4 (PF4) and dominant-negative fibroblast growth receptor (dnFGFR) have been constructed 64, 65. Mouse MPNST cell lines expressing dnFGFR or PF4 had reduced tumor growth and angiogenesis in vivo 64, 65. Infection of human endothelial cells with G47Δ-dnFGFR or G47Δ-PF4 was more cytotoxic than control G47Δ-empty and conditioned media from infected tumor cells reduced endothelial migration in vitro 64, 65. In vivo, G47Δ expressing dnFGFR or PF4 significantly inhibited subcutaneous mouse MPNST growth in nude mice and decreased vascular density compared with control G47Δ alone 64, 65. The effects of PF4 and IL-12 expression on oHSV efficacy in an immunocompetent setting were examined using the orthotopic sciatic nerve mouse MPNST implant model. G47Δ-PF4 was not as effective in immunocompetent mice and only significantly extended survival compared to G47Δ-empty 57. In contrast, G47Δ-IL12 was significantly better than G47Δ-empty at inhibiting neurologic deficit progression and tumor growth, and increasing survival 57.

3.4. oHSV in combination with drugs

MPNST is resistant to standard single agent chemotherapy 41, 66. Using oncolytic virotherapy in combination with existing chemotherapeutics may lead to synergistic interactions that increase therapeutic effects not achievable by either therapy alone 67. oHSV has been successfully combined with a number of chemotherapeutic and molecularly targeted drugs in a variety of solid tumors 67. So far this promising strategy has not been explored in PNST models, except for erlotinib (inhibitor of EGFR tyrosine kinase), and in the oncolytic Ad clinical trial. In vitro, erlotinib in combination with hrR3 or G207 was more cytotoxic to STS26T MPNST cells than either treatment alone 54. Unfortunately, combination treatment of the tumors did not enhance efficacy over oHSV alone 54.

3.5. oHSV safety

Wild type HSV is highly neuroinvasive in the peripheral and central nervous system and neuropathogenic 46. After footpad inoculation, HSV-1 invades the CNS via the sciatic nerve, causing paralysis and death 68. Direct injection of wild type HSV-1 into the sciatic nerve causes nerve demyelination, Wallerian degeneration, and inflammation at early times, followed by paralysis and lethal encephalitis 59-61, 69. In contrast, sciatic nerve injection of NV1023 at a 10-fold higher dose caused no significant toxicity, with only mild Wallerian degeneration 61. Similarly, sciatic nerve injection of G47Δ was non-toxic, with mice gaining weight and exhibiting transient neurologic deficits no different than PBS-injected control mice 57. The G47Δ-injected sciatic nerves did not exhibit any ultrastructural abnormalities, with the exception of focal needle track damage that was also seen in the PBS-injected nerves 57.

3.6. Adenovirus

Oncolytic Ad ONYX-015 is a hybrid Ad2/Ad5 derived from mutant of Ad dl1520 containing a deletion of E1b-55K protein 70. E1b-55K protein together with the E4orf6 protein target p53 for degradation, so that ONYX-015 selectively replicates in tumor cells with mutated p53. More recent studies suggest that E1B-55K is also involved in blocking DNA damage responses and export of late viral RNAs 71. ONYX -015 has been evaluated in a large number of clinical trials for a variety of cancers 72. In 2005, Galanis et al. 16 reported on completed results from the first clinical trial using ONYX-15 to treat patients with advanced sarcoma in combination with mitomycin-C, doxorubicin, and cisplatin chemotherapy. Among the six patients treated was one patient with metastatic MPNST (p53+, MDM2-), who received the highest ONYX-015 dose (1010 pfu) 16. This was the only patient who achieved a partial response, in both the injected bulky tumor and 2 small uninjected lesions, which lasted 11 months. Unfortunately, clinical testing with ONYX-015 was halted during a pivotal phase III trial when Onyx divested the program. A similar oncolytic Ad, H101, has been approved in China for use in head and neck cancers in combination with chemotherapy 72. Since then many new oncolytic Ad vectors have been constructed. Ad5/3-D24-GMCSF (CGTG-102) (Table 1) selectively replicates in p16/Rb-defective cells and has been evaluated in patients with advanced solid tumors 73. Ad5/3-D24-GMCSF has been examined in an immunocompetent Syrian hamster soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) model in combination with doxorubicin and ifosfamide 74. The combination drug/virus treatment was highly effective and resulted in synergistic antitumor efficacy compared with single agent treatments 74. These studies suggest that oncolytic Ad in combination with chemotherapy may be an attractive strategy for PNST.

3.7. Measles virus (MV)

MV, a Morbillivirus in the family Paramyxoviridae, is an enveloped virus with a non-segmented, negative-strand RNA genome 75. Several cases of spontaneous tumor regression in individuals with lymphoma after MV infection have been reported, suggesting that MV may have oncolytic properties 75. Wild type MV uses the cellular receptor SLAM (signaling lymphocyte activation molecule) for cellular entry, which is not commonly expressed on tumor cells, however, attenuated vaccine MV strains like Edmonston are adapted for cellular entry using CD46, which is highly expressed on human tumor cells, including MPNST 76, 77. The human sodium iodide symporter (NIS) has been inserted into MV-Edmonston (MV-NIS) (Table 1) to enable non-invasive monitoring of virus infection and spread using 125I SPECT 76. NIS expression can also facilitate radiotherapy with 131I administration 76. MV-NIS is currently in clinical trials for multiple myeloma, ovarian cancer, and mesothelioma 76. MPNST cell lines were very susceptible to MV-NIS cytotoxicity, while normal Schwann cells were not, despite high-level expression of CD46 77. In vivo, intratumoral injection of MV-NIS was efficacious in inhibiting the growth of subcutaneous MPNST ST88-14 and S462TY tumors 77. NIS expression permitted the detection of MV-infected cells in mice bearing tumors 77. MV is associated with a number of serious neurologic complications in the CNS, but there is no evidence that it invades or causes pathology in the PNS 78.

3.8. Vesticular stomatitis virus (VSV)

VSV is a non-segmented negative-strand RNA virus from the Rhabdoviridae family 79. VSV oncolytic selectivity is due to its extreme sensitivity to type 1 interferon (IFN) and innate antiviral responses, which are defective in most cancer cells 79. VSV can be further attenuated by disrupting the gene order, as in VSV-G/GFP, which was used to isolate VSV-rp30a (Table 1) by positive selection on glioblastoma cells 80. VSV-rp30a also grew and killed human MPNST cell lines S462-TY and STS-26T better than its parent VSV-G/GPF, and growth was not inhibited by pretreatment with INF-α 81. Primary fibroblasts and vascular endothelia cells were about 10-fold less sensitive to VSV-rp30a than the MPNST cells 81. In a human subcutaneous fibrosarcoma model, a single intravenous dose of VSV-rp30a completely inhibited tumor growth 81. A clinical trial is currently ongoing with VSV expressing IFNβ in patients with refractory hepatocellular carcinoma (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01628640).

4. Conclusions

OVs have multiple mechanisms of action, including; direct tumor cell killing, amplification in situ, and induction of anti-tumor immunity. This makes them powerful therapeutic agents. They have unique properties that derive from the biology of the viruses from which they were generated. The results we describe from preclinical studies demonstrate that OVs have robust anti-PNST activity and warrant clinical translation. Most of the studies have been conducted with oHSV, a neurotropic virus that can be genetically engineered to selectively replicate in tumor cells but not normal tissue. Safety studies with oHSV demonstrated no toxic effects or nerve damage after direct injection into the sciatic nerve. Arming oHSV with therapeutic transgenes enhances anti-tumor activity. Other OVs have also been armed, but so far none examined in PNST models. The availability of a number of MPNST preclinical models and the lack of targeted therapies or significant improvements in outcomes for this malignancy, make it a prime target for OV therapy, which has demonstrated impressive efficacy in preclinical models. Even benign PNSTs are highly susceptible to oHSV therapy. There have been fewer studies with other OVs, but oncolytic Ad ONYX-015 is the only OV to be administered to a patient with PNST. Preliminary studies with MV and VSV, suggest that they also have potential to treat PNST.

5. Expert Opinion

Despite the great progress in understanding the molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis of PNSTs, surgical resection of these tumors remains the main treatment paradigm. Due to size or location, these tumors are often inoperable or entail a risk of nerve damage. On the other hand, they are not very susceptible to chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and effective molecularly targeted drugs have not been identified. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are necessary for both benign and malignant PNSTs. OVs are one new promising approach that has been underexplored. Unfortunately, the lack of preclinical animals models for benign PNSTs has hampered progress in developing and testing new therapies, including OVs. However, where models are available, OVs have demonstrated robust anti-tumor activity. The number and types of preclinical models has increased and improved dramatically over the past decade and include models more representative of the clinical situation, such as cancer stem cells, patient-derived xenografts (PDX), and transgenic mice. All models have limitations, but having multiple options improves the likelihood of successful clinical translation.

Advances in genetic engineering allows the construction of OVs that are safe and with specificity for the molecular diversity of tumors. Arming OVs with therapeutics transgenes can target the tumor microenvironment locally. The normal cells and stroma comprising the tumor are a critical component in tumorigenesis and an important target for therapy. The size of transgene to be inserted will vary depending on the virus, but for oHSV this can be between 10-30 kb, sufficient for even multiple transgenes. The choice of transgene is unlimited; be it reporter genes to monitor OV activity, cytotoxic agents or prodrug activating enzymes to kill cells, antiangiogenic factors to inhibit neovascularizaton, immune modulatory factors to enhance anti-tumor immunity, or extracellular matrix modifying agents to enhance OV spread or inhibit tumor cell migration. Importantly, expression is regulated by the selectivity of the OV, so that it is typically expressed locally within the tumor, limiting systemic toxicity.

OVs derived from 12 different viruses have entered clinical trials for a large variety of cancers 15. There is no obvious reason why OVs, in addition to those described here, should not also be effective in treating PNSTs. Talimogene laherparepvec, an oHSV similar to G47Δ except expressing GMCSF, was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced melanoma. This is the first OV approved for clinical use in the US and should significantly increase the interest of the pharmaceutical industry and clinicians in the use of OVs. This is an exciting time for the field of oncolytic virotherapy and PNST is an excellent target for this new therapeutic strategy.

Article Highlights.

  • Oncolytic viruses efficiently kill tumor cells while remaining safe for normal tissues.

  • Oncolytic viruses, especially oncolytic HSV, have demonstrated efficacy and safety in treating PNST and perineural invasion in cancer.

  • ‘Arming’ oncolyltic viruses with therapeutic transgenes or combining with other therapeutic agents enhances antitumor activity.

  • A limited number of preclinical tumor models for PNST has slowed progress in the development of new therapeutic strategies.

  • Preclinical studies with oncolytic HSV in MPNST and schwannoma support clinical translation.

References

  • 1.Korf BR. Neurofibromatosis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;111:333–40. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52891-9.00039-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.July J, Guha A. Peripheral nerve tumors. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;105:665–74. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53502-3.00016-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Porter DE, Prasad V, Foster L, Dall GF, Birch R, Grimer RJ. Survival in Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumours: A Comparison between Sporadic and Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Associated Tumours. Sarcoma. 2009;756395(10):7. doi: 10.1155/2009/756395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.LaFemina J, Qin LX, Moraco NH, Antonescu CR, Fields RC, Crago AM, et al. Oncologic outcomes of sporadic, neurofibromatosis-associated, and radiation-induced malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Annals of surgical oncology. 2013;20(1):66–72. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2573-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lin AL, Gutmann DH. Advances in the treatment of neurofibromatosis-associated tumours. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov;10(11):616–24. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn P, Mertens F. WHO Classification of Tumours. 4th. Geneva: WHO Press; 2013. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Russell SJ, Peng KW, Bell JC. Oncolytic virotherapy. Nature biotechnology. 2012 Jul 10;30(7):658–70. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Guo ZS, Thorne SH, Bartlett DL. Oncolytic virotherapy: molecular targets in tumor-selective replication and carrier cell-mediated delivery of oncolytic viruses. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2008 Apr;1785(2):217–31. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2008.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chiocca EA, Rabkin SD. Oncolytic viruses and their application to cancer immunotherapy. Cancer immunology research. 2014 Apr;2(4):295–300. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lichty BD, Breitbach CJ, Stojdl DF, Bell JC. Going viral with cancer immunotherapy. Nature reviews Cancer. 2014 Aug;14(8):559–67. doi: 10.1038/nrc3770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Angarita FA, Acuna SA, Ottolino-Perry K, Zerhouni S, McCart JA. Mounting a strategic offense: fighting tumor vasculature with oncolytic viruses. Trends in molecular medicine. 2013 Jun;19(6):378–92. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2013.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Everts B, van der Poel HG. Replication-selective oncolytic viruses in the treatment of cancer. Cancer gene therapy. 2005 Feb;12(2):141–61. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kaur B, Cripe TP, Chiocca EA. “Buy one get one free”: armed viruses for the treatment of cancer cells and their microenvironment. Current gene therapy. 2009 Oct;9(5):341–55. doi: 10.2174/156652309789753329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jeyaretna DS, Kuroda T. Recent advances in the development of oncolytic HSV-1 vectors: ‘arming’ of HSV-1 vectors and application of bacterial artificial chromosome technology for their construction. Current opinion in molecular therapeutics. 2007 Oct;9(5):447–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bell J, McFadden G. Viruses for tumor therapy. Cell Host Microbe. 2014 Mar 12;15(3):260–5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Galanis E, Okuno SH, Nascimento AG, Lewis BD, Lee RA, Oliveira AM, et al. Phase I-II trial of ONYX-015 in combination with MAP chemotherapy in patients with advanced sarcomas. Gene therapy. 2005 Mar;12(5):437–45. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302436. * the only clinical trial so far reporting OV treatment of PNST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.First Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Melanoma. Cancer discovery. 2015 Nov 9; doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2015-158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Andtbacka RH, Kaufman HL, Collichio F, Amatruda T, Senzer N, Chesney J, et al. Talimogene Laherparepvec Improves Durable Response Rate in Patients With Advanced Melanoma. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2015 Sep 1;33(25):2780–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.3377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hilton DA, Hanemann CO. Schwannomas and their pathogenesis. Brain pathology. 2014 Apr;24(3):205–20. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lloyd SK, Evans DG. Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2): diagnosis and management. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;115:957–67. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52902-2.00054-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sughrue ME, Yeung AH, Rutkowski MJ, Cheung SW, Parsa AT. Molecular biology of familial and sporadic vestibular schwannomas: implications for novel therapeutics. Journal of neurosurgery. 2011 Feb;114(2):359–66. doi: 10.3171/2009.10.JNS091135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, Xu L, Gonzalez-Agosti C, Burwick JA, Pinney D, Beauchamp R, et al. Universal absence of merlin, but not other ERM family members, in schwannomas. The American journal of pathology. 1997 Dec;151(6):1649–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Plotkin SR, Halpin C, McKenna MJ, Loeffler JS, Batchelor TT, Barker FG., 2nd Erlotinib for progressive vestibular schwannoma in neurofibromatosis 2 patients. Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2010 Sep;31(7):1135–43. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181eb328a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Karajannis MA, Ferner RE. Neurofibromatosis-related tumors: emerging biology and therapies. Current opinion in pediatrics. 2015 Feb;27(1):26–33. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rodriguez FJ, Folpe AL, Giannini C, Perry A. Pathology of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: diagnostic overview and update on selected diagnostic problems. Acta neuropathologica. 2012 Mar;123(3):295–319. doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-0954-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ferner RE, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): diagnosis and management. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;115:939–55. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52902-2.00053-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ratner N, Miller SJ. A RASopathy gene commonly mutated in cancer: the neurofibromatosis type 1 tumour suppressor. Nature reviews Cancer. 2015 May;15(5):290–301. doi: 10.1038/nrc3911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pizem J, Nicholson KM, Mraz J, Prieto VG. Melanocytic differentiation is present in a significant proportion of nonpigmented diffuse neurofibromas: a potential diagnostic pitfall. The American journal of surgical pathology. 2013 Aug;37(8):1182–91. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31828950a3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jett K, Nguyen R, Arman D, Birch P, Chohan H, Farschtschi S, et al. Quantitative associations of scalp and body subcutaneous neurofibromas with internal plexiform tumors in neurofibromatosis 1. Am J Med Genet A. 2015 Jul;167(7):1518–24. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khosrotehrani K, Bastuji-Garin S, Riccardi VM, Birch P, Friedman JM, Wolkenstein P. Subcutaneous neurofibromas are associated with mortality in neurofibromatosis 1: a cohort study of 703 patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Jan 1;132A(1):49–53. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brems H, Beert E, de Ravel T, Legius E. Mechanisms in the pathogenesis of malignant tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1. The Lancet Oncology. 2009 May;10(5):508–15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70033-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ducatman BS, Scheithauer BW, Piepgras DG, Reiman HM, Ilstrup DM. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. A clinicopathologic study of 120 cases. Cancer. 1986 May 15;57(10):2006–21. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860515)57:10<2006::aid-cncr2820571022>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Widemann BC. Current status of sporadic and neurofibromatosis type 1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Curr Oncol Rep. 2009 Jul;11(4):322–8. doi: 10.1007/s11912-009-0045-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Robertson KA, Nalepa G, Yang FC, Bowers DC, Ho CY, Hutchins GD, et al. Imatinib mesylate for plexiform neurofibromas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1: a phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2012 Dec;13(12):1218–24. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70414-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Thway K, Fisher C. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: pathology and genetics. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2014 Apr;18(2):109–16. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2013.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hagel C, Zils U, Peiper M, Kluwe L, Gotthard S, Friedrich RE, et al. Histopathology and clinical outcome of NF1-associated vs. sporadic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2007 Apr;82(2):187–92. doi: 10.1007/s11060-006-9266-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kolberg M, Holand M, Agesen TH, Brekke HR, Liestol K, Hall KS, et al. Survival meta-analyses for >1800 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor patients with and without neurofibromatosis type 1. Neuro-oncology. 2013 Feb;15(2):135–47. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Upadhyaya M, Kluwe L, Spurlock G, Monem B, Majounie E, Mantripragada K, et al. Germline and somatic NF1 gene mutation spectrum in NF1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) Human mutation. 2008 Jan;29(1):74–82. doi: 10.1002/humu.20601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Endo M, Yamamoto H, Setsu N, Kohashi K, Takahashi Y, Ishii T, et al. Prognostic significance of AKT/mTOR and MAPK pathways and antitumor effect of mTOR inhibitor in NF1-related and sporadic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2013 Jan 15;19(2):450–61. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Grobmyer SR, Reith JD, Shahlaee A, Bush CH, Hochwald SN. Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor: molecular pathogenesis and current management considerations. Journal of surgical oncology. 2008 Mar 15;97(4):340–9. doi: 10.1002/jso.20971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stucky CC, Johnson KN, Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Ocal IT, Rose PS, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST): the Mayo Clinic experience. Annals of surgical oncology. 2012 Mar;19(3):878–85. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1978-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, Berger DH, Albo D. Perineural invasion in cancer: a review of the literature. Cancer. 2009 Aug 1;115(15):3379–91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Marchesi F, Piemonti L, Mantovani A, Allavena P. Molecular mechanisms of perineural invasion, a forgotten pathway of dissemination and metastasis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010 Feb;21(1):77–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Roh J, Muelleman T, Tawfik O, Thomas SM. Perineural growth in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a review. Oral Oncol. 2015 Jan;51(1):16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bapat AA, Hostetter G, Von Hoff DD, Han H. Perineural invasion and associated pain in pancreatic cancer. Nature reviews Cancer. 2011 Oct;11(10):695–707. doi: 10.1038/nrc3131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Roizman B, Knipe DM, Whitley RJ. Herpes simplex viruses. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields Virology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. pp. 1823–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jackson JD, McMorris AM, Roth JC, Coleman JM, Whitley RJ, Gillespie GY, et al. Assessment of oncolytic HSV efficacy following increased entry-receptor expression in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cell lines. Gene therapy. 2014 Nov;21(11):984–90. doi: 10.1038/gt.2014.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Peters C, Rabkin SD. Designing herpes viruses as oncolytics. Molecular Therapy — Oncolytics. 2015;2:15010. doi: 10.1038/mto.2015.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Messerli SM, Prabhakar S, Tang Y, Mahmood U, Giovannini M, Weissleder R, et al. Treatment of schwannomas with an oncolytic recombinant herpes simplex virus in murine models of neurofibromatosis type 2. Human gene therapy. 2006 Jan;17(1):20–30. doi: 10.1089/hum.2006.17.20. * Use of novel schwannoma models to demonstrate therapeutic efficacy of oHSV in benign PNST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Prabhakar S, Messerli SM, Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, Liu TC, Rabkin S, Martuza R, et al. Treatment of implantable NF2 schwannoma tumor models with oncolytic herpes simplex virus G47Delta. Cancer gene therapy. 2007 May;14(5):460–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7701037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lee CH, Chung CK, Hyun SJ, Kim CH, Kim KJ, Jahng TA. A longitudinal study to assess the volumetric growth rate of spinal intradural extramedullary tumour diagnosed with schwannoma by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Spine J. 2015 Jun 25; doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4075-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mahller YY, Rangwala F, Ratner N, Cripe TP. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors with high and low Ras-GTP are permissive for oncolytic herpes simplex virus mutants. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2006 Jun;46(7):745–54. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Farassati F, Pan W, Yamoutpour F, Henke S, Piedra M, Frahm S, et al. Ras signaling influences permissiveness of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cells to oncolytic herpes. The American journal of pathology. 2008 Dec;173(6):1861–72. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mahller YY, Vaikunth SS, Currier MA, Miller SJ, Ripberger MC, Hsu YH, et al. Oncolytic HSV and erlotinib inhibit tumor growth and angiogenesis in a novel malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor xenograft model. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2007 Feb;15(2):279–86. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mahller YY, Vaikunth SS, Ripberger MC, Baird WH, Saeki Y, Cancelas JA, et al. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 via oncolytic herpesvirus inhibits tumor growth and vascular progenitors. Cancer research. 2008 Feb 15;68(4):1170–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Maldonado AR, Klanke C, Jegga AG, Aronow BJ, Mahller YY, Cripe TP, et al. Molecular engineering and validation of an oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 transcriptionally targeted to midkine-positive tumors. The journal of gene medicine. 2010 Jul;12(7):613–23. doi: 10.1002/jgm.1479. * Description of transcriptionally targeted OV strategy for selective growth in MPNST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Antoszczyk S, Spyra M, Mautner VF, Kurtz A, Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, Martuza RL, et al. Treatment of orthotopic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors with oncolytic herpes simplex virus. Neuro-oncology. 2014 Aug;16(8):1057–66. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not317. ** Development of new orthotopic MPNST models and demonstration of oHSV efficacy in both human MPNST stem-like cells and in mouse immunocompetent tumors. First description of immunotherapeutic strategy to treat MPNST. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Spyra M, Kluwe L, Hagel C, Nguyen R, Panse J, Kurtz A, et al. Cancer stem cell-like cells derived from malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. PloS one. 2011;6(6):e21099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mashour GA, Moulding HD, Chahlavi A, Khan GA, Rabkin SD, Martuza RL, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of G207 in a novel peripheral nerve sheath tumor model. Experimental neurology. 2001 May;169(1):64–71. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gil Z, Rein A, Brader P, Li S, Shah JP, Fong Y, et al. Nerve-sparing therapy with oncolytic herpes virus for cancers with neural invasion. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2007 Nov 1;13(21):6479–85. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1639. * First description of OV to safely treat carcinoma PNI. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kelly K, Brader P, Rein A, Shah JP, Wong RJ, Fong Y, et al. Attenuated multimutated herpes simplex virus-1 effectively treats prostate carcinomas with neural invasion while preserving nerve function. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2008 Jun;22(6):1839–48. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-097808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Geevarghese SK, Geller DA, de Haan HA, Horer M, Knoll AE, Mescheder A, et al. Phase I/II study of oncolytic herpes simplex virus NV1020 in patients with extensively pretreated refractory colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver. Human gene therapy. 2010 Sep;21(9):1119–28. doi: 10.1089/hum.2010.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kanai R, Rabkin SD. Combinatorial strategies for oncolytic herpes simplex virus therapy of brain tumors. CNS Oncol. 2013 Mar;2(2):129–42. doi: 10.2217/cns.12.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liu TC, Zhang T, Fukuhara H, Kuroda T, Todo T, Canron X, et al. Dominant-negative fibroblast growth factor receptor expression enhances antitumoral potency of oncolytic herpes simplex virus in neural tumors. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2006 Nov 15;12(22):6791–9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Liu TC, Zhang T, Fukuhara H, Kuroda T, Todo T, Martuza RL, et al. Oncolytic HSV armed with platelet factor 4, an antiangiogenic agent, shows enhanced efficacy. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2006 Dec;14(6):789–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.07.011. ** First description of use of OV armed with therapeutic transgene to treat MPNST, targeting both the tumor cells and vasculature. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Farid M, Demicco EG, Garcia R, Ahn L, Merola PR, Cioffi A, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. The oncologist. 2014 Feb;19(2):193–201. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kanai R, Wakimoto H, Cheema T, Rabkin SD. Oncolytic herpes simplex virus vectors and chemotherapy: are combinatorial strategies more effective for cancer? Future Oncol. 2010 Apr;6(4):619–34. doi: 10.2217/fon.10.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wildy P. The progression of herpes simplex virus to the central nervous system of the mouse. The Journal of hygiene. 1967 Jun;65(2):173–92. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400045678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Townsend JJ, Collins PK. Peripheral nervous system demyelination with herpes simplex virus. Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology. 1986 Jul;45(4):419–25. doi: 10.1097/00005072-198607000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kirn D. Oncolytic virotherapy for cancer with the adenovirus dl1520 (Onyx-015): results of phase I and II trials. Expert opinion on biological therapy. 2001 May;1(3):525–38. doi: 10.1517/14712598.1.3.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Blackford AN, Grand RJ. Adenovirus E1B 55-kilodalton protein: multiple roles in viral infection and cell transformation. Journal of virology. 2009 May;83(9):4000–12. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02417-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Larson C, Oronsky B, Scicinski J, Fanger GR, Stirn M, Oronsky A, et al. Going viral: a review of replication-selective oncolytic adenoviruses. Oncotarget. 2015 Aug 21;6(24):19976–89. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Koski A, Kangasniemi L, Escutenaire S, Pesonen S, Cerullo V, Diaconu I, et al. Treatment of cancer patients with a serotype 5/3 chimeric oncolytic adenovirus expressing GMCSF. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2010;18(10):1874–84. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Siurala M, Bramante S, Vassilev L, Hirvinen M, Parviainen S, Tahtinen S, et al. Oncolytic adenovirus and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy results in synergistic antitumor activity against soft-tissue sarcoma. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 2015 Feb 15;136(4):945–54. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Russell SJ, Peng KW. Measles virus for cancer therapy. Current topics in microbiology and immunology. 2009;330:213–41. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-70617-5_11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Msaouel P, Opyrchal M, Domingo Musibay E, Galanis E. Oncolytic measles virus strains as novel anticancer agents. Expert opinion on biological therapy. 2013 Apr;13(4):483–502. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2013.749851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Deyle DR, Escobar DZ, Peng KW, Babovic-Vuksanovic D. Oncolytic measles virus as a novel therapy for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Gene. 2015 Jul 1;565(1):140–5. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.04.001. ** First description of use of MV to treat MPNST and demonstration of the utility of non-invasive imaging with NIS to follow virus spread in MPNST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Griffin DE. Measles virus and the nervous system. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;123:577–90. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53488-0.00027-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Hastie E, Grdzelishvili VZ. Vesicular stomatitis virus as a flexible platform for oncolytic virotherapy against cancer. The Journal of general virology. 2012 Dec;93(Pt 12):2529–45. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.046672-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wollmann G, Tattersall P, van den Pol AN. Targeting human glioblastoma cells: comparison of nine viruses with oncolytic potential. Journal of virology. 2005;79(10):6005–22. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.10.6005-6022.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Paglino JC, van den Pol AN. Vesicular stomatitis virus has extensive oncolytic activity against human sarcomas: rare resistance is overcome by blocking interferon pathways. Journal of virology. 2011 Sep;85(18):9346–58. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00723-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES