Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2016 Nov 17;7:1717. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01717

Mighty Dwarfs: Arabidopsis Autoimmune Mutants and Their Usages in Genetic Dissection of Plant Immunity

Rowan van Wersch 1, Xin Li 1,2, Yuelin Zhang 1,*
PMCID: PMC5112265  PMID: 27909443

Abstract

Plants lack the adaptive immune system possessed by mammals. Instead they rely on innate immunity to defend against pathogen attacks. Genomes of higher plants encode a large number of plant immune receptors belonging to different protein families, which are involved in the detection of pathogens and activation of downstream defense pathways. Plant immunity is tightly controlled to avoid activation of defense responses in the absence of pathogens, as failure to do so can lead to autoimmunity that compromises plant growth and development. Many autoimmune mutants have been reported, most of which are associated with dwarfism and often spontaneous cell death. In this review, we summarize previously reported Arabidopsis autoimmune mutants, categorizing them based on their functional groups. We also discuss how their obvious morphological phenotypes make them ideal tools for epistatic analysis and suppressor screens, and summarize genetic screens that have been carried out in various autoimmune mutant backgrounds.

Keywords: Arabidopsis, autoimmunity, suppressor screening, PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI), effector-triggered immunity (ETI), receptor-like kinases, NB-LRR proteins

Introduction

The ability to detect and respond to pathogens is essential for the survival of multicellular organisms. Plants have developed sophisticated immune systems to combat microbial pathogens. Recognition of Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs), components important for pathogen lifestyles such as bacterial flagellin, by Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) leads to activation of PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) (Boller and Felix, 2009). Most PRRs belong to the transmembrane receptor-like kinase (RLK) or receptor-like protein (RLP) families (Monaghan and Zipfel, 2012). Unlike RLKs, which contain extracellular, transmembrane, and intracellular kinase domains, RLPs lack the intracellular kinase domain.

In response to pathogens that deliver effector proteins to promote virulence by avoiding detection by the host cells or inhibiting PTI, plants have evolved resistance (R) proteins, which detect effectors and trigger an immune response termed effector triggered immunity (ETI). R proteins recognize effectors either by directly binding to the effectors or indirectly sensing modifications to host proteins caused by the effectors (Jones and Dangl, 2006). Most R proteins contain a central nucleotide-binding domain (NB) and C-terminal leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), with either a Toll-interleukin 1-like receptor (TIR) or a coiled-coil (CC) domain at their N termini.

Plant immunity is under tight negative control to avoid activation in the absence of pathogens. Immune receptors are generally maintained at inactive states and activated only upon detection of pathogens. Loss-of-function mutations in negative regulators and gain-of-function mutations in plant immune receptors often lead to autoimmunity. The typical phenotypes of autoimmune mutants include dwarfism, elevated salicylic acid levels, constitutive expression of defense genes and enhanced disease resistance to pathogens, and in some cases also spontaneous lesion formation. They have been instrumental in assisting our studies of plant immunity. Previous reviews have highlighted lesion mimic mutants (Bruggeman et al., 2015; Rodriguez et al., 2016). Here we are focusing on Arabidopsis autoimmune mutants (Table 1) and their application in studying plant immunity.

Table 1.

Arabidopsis thaliana autoimmune mutants organized by protein class.

Mutant Protein class Reference
snc1 TIR-NB-LRR Li et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2003
ssi4 TIR-NB-LRR Shirano et al., 2002
slh1 TIR-NB-LRR Noutoshi et al., 2005
chs3-2D, chs3-1 TIR-NB-LRR Yang et al., 2010; Bi et al., 2011
chs2 TIR-NB-LRR Huang et al., 2010
uni-1D CC-NB-LRR Igari et al., 2008
bak1 bkk1 LRR-RLKs He et al., 2007
bir1 LRR-RLK Gao et al., 2009
snc4-1D RLK Bi et al., 2010
cerk1-4 LysM-RLK Petutschnig et al., 2014
snc2-1D RLP Zhang et al., 2010
rin4 Unknown Mackey et al., 2002
cpr1 F-Box Bowling et al., 1994; Gou et al., 2012
srfr1 TPR Li et al., 2010a; Kim et al., 2010
cpn1/bon1 Copine Hua et al., 2001; Jambunathan et al., 2001
mkp1 MAPK phosphotase Bartels et al., 2009
lsd1 Zinc finger Dietrich et al., 1994; Dietrich et al., 1997
acd11 Sphingosine transfer Brodersen et al., 2002
cpr5 Nucleoporin Bowling et al., 1997
mekk1 MAPKKK Ichimura et al., 2006; Nakagami et al., 2006
mpk4 MAPK Petersen et al., 2000
mkk1 mkk2 MAPKKs Gao et al., 2008; Qiu et al., 2008
acd6 TM-ANK Rate et al., 1999; Lu et al., 2003
bda1-17 TM-ANK Yang et al., 2012
dnd1 CNG Ion Channel Yu et al., 1998
dnd2/hlm1 CNG Ion Channel Balagué et al., 2003; Jurkowski et al., 2004
cpr22 CNG Ion Channel Yoshioka et al., 2001
npr3 npr4 BTB-ANK Zhang et al., 2006
sr1/camta3 Transcription factor Galon et al., 2008; Du et al., 2009
pub13 U-box Li et al., 2012
cpr6-1 Unknown Clarke et al., 1998
ssi2 S-ACP-DES Shah et al., 2001
syp121 syp122 Syntaxin Zhang et al., 2007
cad1 MACPF Morita-Yamamuro et al., 2005
nsl1 MACPF Noutoshi et al., 2006

Gain of Function mutations TM, Transmembrane; ANK, Ankyrin repeat; TPR, Tetratrico-peptide repeat; S-ACP-DES, Stearoyl-acyl carrier desaturase protein.

Autoimmunity Caused By Gain-Of-Function Mutations in NB-LRR Proteins

Autoimmunity in a number of Arabidopsis mutants is caused by mutations in TIR-NB-LRR proteins. Among them, suppressor of npr1-1, constitutive (snc) 1 is one of the most well studied (Li et al., 2001). A single amino acid change in the linker region between the NB and LRR domains leads to over-accumulation of the SNC1 protein and activation of defense responses (Zhang et al., 2003). snc1 exhibits typical autoimmune phenotypes, but does not have spontaneous cell death. Both SA-dependent and SA-independent defense pathways contribute to the enhanced pathogen resistance in snc1. Unlike snc1, suppressor of salicylic acid insensitive (ssi) 4 is another gain-of-function mutant of a TIR-NB-LRR protein that displays both dwarfism and spontaneous cell death (Shirano et al., 2002).

The autoimmune phenotypes in sensitive to low humidity (slh)1 (an allele of RRS1) and chilling sensitive (chs) 3-2D are caused by mutations in atypical TIR-NB-LRR proteins (Noutoshi et al., 2005; Bi et al., 2011). RESISTANT TO RALSTONIA SOLANACEARUM 1 (RRS1) and CHS3 contain extra C-terminal domains proposed to function as integrated decoys for pathogen effectors. RRS1 has a WRKY DNA-binding domain at its C-terminus. In slh1, a single amino acid insertion in the DNA-binding domain causes activation of defense responses (Noutoshi et al., 2005). CHS3 contains a LIM domain at its C-terminus. A missense mutation close to the LIM domain in chs3-2D leads to extreme dwarfism and activation of defense responses (Bi et al., 2011). It is likely that mutations in slh1 and chs3-2D are sensed by the TIR-NB-LRR part of the protein, which triggers immune activation.

A second gain-of-function allele of CHS3, chs3-1, gives rise to a truncated CHS3 without part of the LIM domain (Yang et al., 2010). The phenotype of chs3-1 is temperature dependent and manifested when grown at 16°C or lower. Another chilling sensitive mutant, chs2-1, also contains a gain-of-function mutation in a TIR-NB-LRR protein (Huang et al., 2010). A single amino acid substitution in the NB domain of RECOGNITION OF PERONOSPORA PARASITICA 4 (RPP4) causes constitutive defense activation when the mutant is grown at 16°C or lower. CHS1 encodes a truncated TIR-NB protein. A missense mutation in CHS1 results in activation of cell death and defense responses at low temperature (Wang et al., 2013; Zbierzak et al., 2013).

uni-1D is the only known mutant of a CC-NB-LRR protein that causes autoimmunity (Igari et al., 2008). It carries three amino acid substitutions in the LRR domain. In addition to constitutive defense activation, uni-1D has a variety of developmental defects associated with increased cytokinin accumulation. It is unclear how activation of UNI leads to modifications in the cytokinin pathway.

Autoimmunity Caused By Mutations in RLKS/RLPS

Arabidopsis Brassinosteroid Insensitive 1-associated receptor kinase 1 (BAK1) is a critical component of PTI which functions as co-receptor of multiple PRRs (Liebrand et al., 2014). Interestingly, knocking out both BAK1 and its close homolog of BAK1-like 1 (BKK1) leads to strong autoimmune phenotypes (He et al., 2007). Defense responses are not constitutively activated in the bak1 and bkk1 single mutants, but uncontrolled spreading of necrosis occurs in bak1 knockout mutant plants upon infection by necrotrophic pathogens (Kemmerling et al., 2007). The mechanism of how loss-of-function of BAK1 and BKK1 activates plant immunity remains to be determined.

Several members of the BAK1-interacting RLK (BIR) subfamily have been shown to associate with BAK1 in vivo and serve as regulators of immunity (Gao et al., 2009; Halter et al., 2014). The bir1-1 knockout mutant displayed extreme dwarfism, spontaneous cell death and constitutive defense responses (Gao et al., 2009). Loss of BIR2 function leads to enhanced PTI responses, but does not cause autoimmunity (Halter et al., 2014).

Gain-of-function mutations in two RLKs were shown to cause autoimmunity. In snc4-1D, a single amino acid substitution in the kinase domain of SNC4 leads to extreme dwarfism and constitutive defense responses (Bi et al., 2010). CHITIN ELICITOR RECEPTOR KINASE (CERK) 1 is an RLK involved in perception of chitin and bacterial peptidoglycan (Miya et al., 2007; Wan et al., 2008). In cerk1-4, a single amino acid change in the CERK1 ectodomain results in deregulated cell death upon pathogen challenge (Petutschnig et al., 2014).

snc2-1D is the only reported gain-of-function RLP mutant which causes autoimmunity in Arabidopsis (Zhang et al., 2010). Loss of function of SNC2 results in enhanced susceptibility to the non-pathogenic bacterium P.s.t. DC3000 hrcC, suggesting that SNC2 plays an important role in PTI. The alteration of a G to R in a conserved motif of the transmembrane helix in snc2-1D may disrupt the interaction between SNC2 and its negative regulator.

Autoimmunity Caused By Mutations in Other Types of Protein

Mutations in a large number of genes encoding proteins not in the NB-LRR or RLK/RLP families were also found to result in autoimmunity. In some cases, the autoimmune phenotypes are caused by loss-of-function of negative regulators or gain-of-function of positive regulators of plant immunity. But most often, they are due to activation of immunity mediated by specific NB-LRR immune receptors, probably as targets of pathogen effectors that are monitored or guarded by Resistance proteins. One well-studied example is RPM1 INTERACTING PROTEIN (RIN) 4, which is guarded by two NB-LRR proteins RESISTANT TO P. SYRINGAE (RPS) 2 and RESISTANCE TO P. SYRINGAE PV MACULICOLA (RPM) 1 (Axtell and Staskawicz, 2003; Mackey et al., 2003). Loss of RIN4 triggers defense activation mediated by RPS2 and RPM1 (Belkhadir et al., 2004).

Loss-of-function mutations in several genes cause activation of SNC1-mediated immune responses. CONSTITUTIVE EXPRESSER OF PR GENES (CPR) 1 encodes an F-box protein that regulates the turnover of SNC1 (Cheng et al., 2011; Gou et al., 2012). Mutations in CPR1 cause elevated SNC1 and RPS2 protein levels and activation of defense responses. SUPPRESSOR OF RPS4-RLD (SRFR) 1 is also involved in regulating SNC1 protein levels. Mutations in SRFR1 result in increased SNC1 level and activation of SNC1-mediated immunity (Kim et al., 2010; Li et al., 2010a). Knockout mutants of BONZAI (BON) 1 and MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE PHOSPHATASE (MKP) 1 also exhibit autoimmune phenotypes that are dependent on SNC1 (Yang and Hua, 2004; Bartels et al., 2009). How loss of BON1 and MKP1 leads to activation of SNC1-mediated immunity remains to be determined.

The autoimmune phenotypes of two lesion-mimic mutants, lesion simulating disease (lsd) 1 and accelerated cell death (acd) 11, are also caused by activation of NB-LRR protein mediated immunity. The spontaneous cell death phenotype in lsd1 is dependent on ACTIVATED DISEASE RESISTANCE (ADR) 1, ADR1-L1, and ADR1-L2, which function as “helper NB-LRRs” that assist other NB-LRR proteins to transduce defense signals (Bonardi et al., 2011). LAZARUS (LAZ) 5, a TIR-NB-LRR protein, is required for the cell death and constitutive defense phenotype in acd11 (Palma et al., 2010). The constitutive defense response in another lesion-mimic mutant, cpr5, was also shown to associate with activation of NB-LRR protein mediated immunity (Wang et al., 2014).

Arabidopsis MAPK/ERK KINASE KINASE (MEKK) 1, MAP KINASE KINASE (MKK) 1/MKK2, and MAP KINASE (MPK) 4 form a MAPK cascade that plays critical roles in plant immunity (Gao et al., 2008; Qiu et al., 2008). Loss-of-function of MEKK1, MKK1/MKK2, or MPK4 leads to activation of defense responses (Ichimura et al., 2006; Nakagami et al., 2006; Suarez-Rodriguez et al., 2007). The autoimmune phenotypes of mekk1, mkk1 mkk2, and mpk4 mutants are dependent on the CC-NB-LRR protein SUMM2, suggesting that the MEKK1-MKK1/MKK2-MPK4 cascade is monitored by SUMM2, which can sense its disruption by pathogen effectors (Zhang et al., 2012).

ACD6 and BIAN DA (BDA) 1 are two structurally related transmembrane proteins with an N-terminal ankyrin-repeat domain (Lu et al., 2003; Yang et al., 2012). acd6-1 and bda1-17D are both gain-of-function mutations located in the transmembrane regions, which cause spontaneous cell death and constitutive defense responses. ACD6 positively regulates the abundance of several PRRs (Tateda et al., 2015). It likely functions as a critical regulator of PTI. BDA1 is required for the autoimmunity of snc2-1D, suggesting that it is a positive regulator of SNC2-mediated defense responses (Yang et al., 2012).

Mutations in multiple genes in the cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel (CNGC) family have been shown to cause autoimmune phenotypes, highlighting the potential importance of calcium channels in plant immune regulation. Loss-of-function mutations in DEFENSE NO DEATH (DND) 1 (CNGC2) and DND2 (CNGC4) results in constitutive defense responses in the absence of cell death (Clough et al., 2000; Balagué et al., 2003; Jurkowski et al., 2004), suggesting that they play critical roles in negative regulation of plant defense. The spontaneous cell death and constitutive defense responses in the semi-dominant mutant cpr22 are caused by a novel chimeric protein generated by a deletion that fused CNGC11 and CNGC12 (Yoshioka et al., 2006). Knockout analysis showed that both CNGC11 and CNGC12 function in positive regulation of pathogen resistance (Yoshioka et al., 2006).

Mutations in several other negative regulators of plant immunity were shown to cause activation of defense responses. Double knockout mutants of NON-EXPRESSER OF PR GENES (NPR) 3 and NPR4 exhibit constitutive defense gene expression and enhanced resistance to pathogens (Zhang et al., 2006). T-DNA insertion mutants of CALMODULIN-BINDING TRANSCRIPTION ACTIVATOR (CAMTA) 3 displayed enhanced disease resistance and dwarfism when grown at low temperatures (Du et al., 2009), whereas a gain-of-function mutation in CAMTA3 leads to compromised immune responses (Jing et al., 2011; Nie et al., 2012). PLANT U-BOX (PUB) 13 is a E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in degradation of FLAGELLIN-SENSITIVE2 and the ABA co-receptor ABI1 (Lu et al., 2011; Kong et al., 2015). Knockout mutant plants of pub13 exhibit spontaneous cell death and enhanced pathogen resistance (Li et al., 2012).

In some autoimmune mutants, the mechanism of how defense responses are constitutively activated is unclear. cpr6-1 is a semi-dominant mutant with constitutive defense responses due to a mutation of unknown nature (Clarke et al., 1998). Loss-of-function of the stearoyl-ACP desaturase SSI2 activates NPR1-independent defense responses (Shah et al., 2001; Kachroo A. et al., 2003). The link between altered fatty acid metabolism and activation of immunity remains to be determined. Double knockout mutant plants of SYNTAXIN OF PLANTS (SYP) 121 and SYP122 display a lesion-mimic phenotype and enhanced pathogen resistance (Zhang et al., 2007). Loss-of-function mutations in two membrane attack complex/perforin proteins, CONSTITUTIVELY ACTIVATED CELL DEATH (CAD) 1 and NECROTIC SPOTTED LESIONS (NSL) 1, result in spontaneous cell death and constitutive defense response (Morita-Yamamuro et al., 2005; Noutoshi et al., 2006). The exact roles of CAD1 and NSL1 in immunity are unclear.

Applications of Autoimmune Mutants in Genetic Analysis of Plant Immunity

One obvious feature of autoimmune mutants is the distinct morphological phenotypes such as dwarfism and spontaneous cell death. They are often used in epistasis analysis to test genetic interactions. Because large populations of plants can be screened using these morphological phenotypes as readout, a number of suppressor mutant screens have been carried out on various autoimmune mutants (Table 2). Mutants obtained from a suppressor screen can be either intragenic or extragenic suppressors. Intragenic suppressor mutations can be useful for structure-function analysis, whereas extragenic suppressors are valuable for identifying components required for the autoimmune phenotypes in the original mutant.

Table 2.

Suppressor screens carried out on known Arabidopsis autoimmune mutants.

Mutant Suppressors identified Reference
mkk1 mkk2 summ mutants Kong et al., 2012
acd11 laz mutants Palma et al., 2010
lsd1 phx/adr mutants Bonardi et al., 2011
bir1 sobir mutants Gao et al., 2009
snc1 mos mutants Zhang and Li, 2005
snc4-1D 6 intragenic, sua, rsn2 Zhang et al., 2014
snc2-1D 6 intragenic, bda mutants Zhang et al., 2010
ssi2 rdc and sfd mutants Kachroo P. et al., 2003
acd6-1 17 intragenic, sup6 Lu et al., 2009
slh1 rps4, mutants, 14 intragenic Sohn et al., 2014
syp121 syp122 fmol, aldl, pad4 Zhang et al., 2008
chs2 1 intragenic, sgt1b, rar1 Huang et al., 2010
cpr22 Intragenic suppressors Baxter et al., 2008
bak1 bkk1 sbb1, stt3a Du et al., 2016;
de Oliveira et al., 2016

One very useful feature of autoimmune mutants is that the dwarf phenotype is often dependent on environmental conditions such as temperature and humidity. For example, the dwarf phenotype of bon1 and snc4-1D can be fully suppressed and the dwarf phenotype of snc2-1D, mkk1 mkk2, and bir1-1 can be partially suppressed when grown at 28°C (Hua et al., 2001; Gao et al., 2009; Bi et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2012). The dwarf phenotype of several other mutants such as ssi4, cpr22, and slh1 can be suppressed by high humidity (Yoshioka et al., 2001; Zhou et al., 2004; Noutoshi et al., 2005). Temperature and humidity sensitivity are frequently observed in the same mutants, suggesting a common element of these phenotypes, although the molecular mechanisms behind these conditional phenotypes are not clear yet. For mutants with extreme dwarf morphology, seeds of a mutagenized mutant population can be obtained by growing plants at high temperature or high humidity. Mutant screens can be subsequently carried out in the next generation at regular growth conditions. The conditional features of the autoimmune mutants allow screening of large mutagenized populations, enabling systematic discovery.

Analysis of suppressors of autoimmune mutants has been very effective for investigating the molecular basis of the respective constitutive defense responses. For example, studies on suppressor of mkk1 mkk (summ) 2 revealed that the autoimmune phenotypes in mekk1, mkk1 mkk2, and mpk4 are due to activation of immune responses mediated by the CC-NB-LRR protein SUMM2 (Zhang et al., 2012). Characterization of suppressor mutants of acd11 revealed that loss of ACD11 results in activation of immune responses mediated by the TIR-NB-LRR protein LAZ5 (Palma et al., 2010). Analysis of suppressor mutants of lsd1 revealed that ADR1, ADR1-L1, and ADR1-L2 are required for the lesion mimic phenotype of lsd1 (Bonardi et al., 2011), suggesting that NB-LRR-mediated defense responses are activated in the mutant. Studies on suppressors of bir1-1 revealed that loss of BIR1 leads to activation of immune responses mediated by RLKs BAK1 and SUPPRESSOR OF BIR1 (SOBIR) 1 (Gao et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2016).

Suppressors of autoimmune mutants have been very useful for studying the biogenesis of plant immune receptors and dissecting signaling pathways downstream of plant immune receptors. For example, analysis of suppressors of snc1 revealed that SNC1 is regulated at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels and highlights the importance of nucleocytoplasmic trafficking and RNA processing in plant immunity (Palma et al., 2005, 2007; Zhang and Li, 2005; Zhang et al., 2005; Cheng et al., 2009; Germain et al., 2010; Li et al., 2010b; Xu et al., 2011, 2012; Xia et al., 2013). The identification of MODIFIER OF SNC1 (MOS) 5 suggests that protein ubiquitination plays an important role in immunity mediated by NB-LRR proteins (Goritschnig et al., 2007). From the snc1 suppressor screen, the transcriptional repressor TOPLESS RELATED 1 was identified as a critical plant immune regulator that suppresses the expression of negative regulators of immunity (Zhu et al., 2010). Identification of set domain group 8 (sdg8) as a suppressor of acd11 revealed that the expression of LAZ5 is regulated by histone modifications (Palma et al., 2010). Studies on snc4-1D suppressor mutants revealed critical roles of alternative splicing in immunity mediated by the RLKs SNC4 and CERK1 (Zhang et al., 2014).

Analysis of suppressor mutants of snc2-1D identified BDA1 as a critical regulator of PTI (Yang et al., 2012). It also identified WRKY DNA-BINDING PROTEIN (WRKY) 70 as a critical regulator of the SA-independent defense pathway (Zhang et al., 2010). The identification of gtp binding protein beta (agb) 1 as a suppressor of bir1-1 and subsequent studies revealed that heterotrimeric G-proteins serve as a converging point for immunity activated by multiple RLKs (Liu et al., 2013).

In addition to suppressor screens, autoimmune mutants can also be used for enhancer screens. For example, a genetic screen looking for enhancers of snc1 identified many muse (mutants, snc1-enhancing) mutants (Huang et al., 2013). Analysis of the muse mutants lead to the identification of several components involved in proteasome-mediated degradation of SNC1 (Huang S. et al., 2014; Huang Y. et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2016). It also revealed a crucial role of N-terminal acetylation on the turnover of SNC1 (Xu et al., 2015).

Concluding Remarks

Mutant analyses have been instrumental in the mechanistic studies of plant immunity. A wide range of autoimmune mutants has been identified in Arabidopsis. In some of these mutants, the mechanism of defense activation is unclear. Interpretation of data obtained from them is often difficult, especially when the mutations occur in proteins involved in general biological processes. However, the autoimmune phenotypes of many mutants are caused by activation of defense responses mediated by specific plant immune receptors. Their distinct phenotypes facilitate easy and fast identification of suppressor or enhancer mutants, enabling new discoveries and allowing researchers to study signaling mechanisms in plant immunity.

Author Contributions

All authors listed, have made substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors apologize to researchers whose work could not be included in the review due to space constraints. Works in the Zhang and Li labs are supported by NSERC-Discovery program.

Footnotes

Funding. This work is funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

References

  1. Axtell M. J., Staskawicz B. J. (2003). Initiation of RPS2-specified disease resistance in Arabidopsis is coupled to the AvrRpt2-directed elimination of RIN4. Cell 112 369–377. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00036-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balagué C., Lin B., Alcon C., Flottes G., Malmstrom S., Kohler C., et al. (2003). HLM1, an essential signaling component in the hypersensitive response, is a member of the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel ion channel family. Plant Cell 15 365–379. 10.1105/tpc.006999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartels S., Anderson J. C., Gonzalez Besteiro M. A., Carreri A., Hirt H., Buchala A., et al. (2009). MAP kinase phosphatase1 and protein tyrosine phosphatase1 are repressors of salicylic acid synthesis and SNC1-mediated responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21 2884–2897. 10.1105/tpc.109.067678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baxter J., Moeder W., Urquhart W., Shahinas D., Chin K., Christendat D., et al. (2008). Identification of a functionally essential amino acid for Arabidopsis cyclic nucleotide gated ion channels using the chimeric AtCNGC11/12 gene. Plant J. 56 457–469. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03619.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Belkhadir Y., Nimchuk Z., Hubert D. A., Mackey D., Dangl J. L. (2004). Arabidopsis RIN4 negatively regulates disease resistance mediated by RPS2 and RPM1 downstream or independent of the NDR1 signal modulator and is not required for the virulence functions of bacterial type III effectors AvrRpt2 or AvrRpm1. Plant Cell 16 2822–2835. 10.1105/tpc.104.024117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bi D., Cheng Y. T., Li X., Zhang Y. (2010). Activation of plant immune responses by a gain-of-function mutation in an atypical receptor-like kinase. Plant Physiol. 153 1771–1779. 10.1104/pp.110.158501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bi D., Johnson K., Huang Y., Zhu Z., Li X., Zhang Y. (2011). Mutations in an atypical TIR-NB-LRR-LIM resistance protein confers autoimmunity. Front. Plant Sci. 2:71 10.3389/fpls.2011.00071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boller T., Felix G. (2009). A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60 379–406. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonardi V., Tang S., Stallmann A., Roberts M., Cherkis K., Dangl J. L. (2011). Expanded functions for a family of plant intracellular immune receptors beyond specific recognition of pathogen effectors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 16463–16468. 10.1073/pnas.1113726108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bowling S. A., Clarke J. D., Liu Y., Klessig D. F., Dong X. (1997). The cpr5 mutant of Arabidopsis expresses both NPR1-dependent and NPR1-independent resistance. Plant Cell 9 1573–1584. 10.2307/3870444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bowling S. A., Guo A., Cao H., Gordon A. S., Klessig D. F., Dong X. (1994). A mutation in Arabidopsis that leads to constitutive expression of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 6 1845–1857. 10.2307/3869912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brodersen P., Petersen M., Pike H. M., Olszak B., Skov S., Ødum N., et al. (2002). Knockout of Arabidopsis accelerated-cell-death11 encoding a sphingosine transfer protein causes activation of programmed cell death and defense. Genes Dev. 16 490–502. 10.1101/gad.218202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bruggeman Q., Raynaud C., Benhamed M., Delarue M. (2015). To die or not to die? Lessons from lesion mimic mutants. Front. Plant Sci. 6:24 10.3389/fpls.2015.00024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheng Y. T., Germain H., Wiermer M., Bi D., Xu F., Garcia A. V., et al. (2009). Nuclear pore complex component MOS7/Nup88 is required for innate immunity and nuclear accumulation of defense regulators in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21 2503–2516. 10.1105/tpc.108.064519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng Y. T., Li Y., Huang S., Huang Y., Dong X., Zhang Y., et al. (2011). Stability of plant immune-receptor resistance proteins is controlled by SKP1-CULLIN1-F-box (SCF)-mediated protein degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 14694–14699. 10.1073/pnas.1105685108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Clarke J. D., Liu Y., Klessig D. F., Dong X. (1998). Uncoupling PR gene expression from NPR1 and bacterial resistance: characterization of the dominant Arabidopsis cpr6-1 mutant. Plant Cell 10 557–569. 10.1105/tpc.10.4.557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Clough S. J., Fengler K. A., Yu I. C., Lippok B., Smith R. K., Jr., Bent A. F. (2000). The Arabidopsis dnd1 “defense, no death” gene encodes a mutated cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 9323–9328. 10.1073/pnas.150005697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. de Oliveira M. V., Xu G., Li B., de Souza Vespoli L., Meng X., Chen X., et al. (2016). Specific control of Arabidopsis BAK1/SERK4-regulated cell death by protein glycosylation. Nat. Plants 2:15218 10.1038/nplants.2015.218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dietrich R. A., Delaney T. P., Uknes S. J., Ward E. R., Ryals J. A., Dangl J. L. (1994). Arabidopsis mutants simulating disease resistance response. Cell 77 565–577. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90218-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dietrich R. A., Richberg M. H., Schmidt R., Dean C., Dangl J. L. (1997). A novel zinc finger protein is encoded by the Arabidopsis LSD1 gene and functions as a negative regulator of plant cell death. Cell 88 685–694. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81911-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Du J., Gao Y., Zhan Y., Zhang S., Wu Y., Xiao Y., et al. (2016). Nucleocytoplasmic trafficking is essential for BAK1-and BKK1-mediated cell-death control. Plant J. 85 520–531. 10.1111/tpj.13125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Du L., Ali G. S., Simons K. A., Hou J., Yang T., Reddy A. S., et al. (2009). Ca(2+)/calmodulin regulates salicylic-acid-mediated plant immunity. Nature 457 1154–1158. 10.1038/nature07612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Galon Y., Nave R., Boyce J. M., Nachmias D., Knight M. R., Fromm H. (2008). Calmodulin-binding transcription activator (CAMTA) 3 mediates biotic defense responses in Arabidopsis. FEBS Lett. 582 943–948. 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.02.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gao M., Liu J., Bi D., Zhang Z., Cheng F., Chen S., et al. (2008). MEKK1, MKK1/MKK2 and MPK4 function together in a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade to regulate innate immunity in plants. Cell Res. 18 1190–1198. 10.1038/cr.2008.300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gao M., Wang X., Wang D., Xu F., Ding X., Zhang Z., et al. (2009). Regulation of cell death and innate immunity by two receptor-like kinases in Arabidopsis. Cell Host Microbe 6 34–44. 10.1016/j.chom.2009.05.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Germain H., Qu N., Cheng Y. T., Lee E., Huang Y., Dong O. X., et al. (2010). MOS11: a new component in the mRNA export pathway. PLoS Genet. 6:e1001250 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Goritschnig S., Zhang Y., Li X. (2007). The ubiquitin pathway is required for innate immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 49 540–551. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02978.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gou M. Y., Shi Z. Y., Zhu Y., Bao Z. L., Wang G. Y., Hua J. (2012). The F-box protein CPR1/CPR30 negatively regulates R protein SNC1 accumulation. Plant J. 69 411–420. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04799.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Halter T., Imkampe J., Mazzotta S., Wierzba M., Postel S., Bucherl C., et al. (2014). The leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase BIR2 is a negative regulator of BAK1 in plant immunity. Curr. Biol. 24 134–143. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. He K., Gou X., Yuan T., Lin H., Asami T., Yoshida S., et al. (2007). BAK1 and BKK1 regulate brassinosteroid-dependent growth and brassinosteroid-independent cell-death pathways. Curr. Biol. 17 1109–1115. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hua J., Grisafi P., Cheng S. H., Fink G. R. (2001). Plant growth homeostasis is controlled by the Arabidopsis BON1 and BAP1 genes. Genes Dev. 15 2263–2272. 10.1101/gad.918101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Huang S., Chen X., Zhong X., Li M., Ao K., Huang J., et al. (2016). Plant TRAF proteins regulate NLR immune receptor turnover. Cell Host Microbe 19 204–215. 10.1016/j.chom.2016.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang S., Monaghan J., Zhong X., Lin L., Sun T., Dong O. X., et al. (2014). HSP90s are required for NLR immune receptor accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 79 427–439. 10.1111/tpj.12573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang Y., Minaker S., Roth C., Huang S., Hieter P., Lipka V., et al. (2014). An E4 ligase facilitates polyubiquitination of plant immune receptor resistance proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26 485–496. 10.1105/tpc.113.119057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Huang X., Li J., Bao F., Zhang X., Yang S. (2010). A gain-of-function mutation in the Arabidopsis disease resistance gene RPP4 confers sensitivity to low temperature. Plant Physiol. 154 796–809. 10.1104/pp.110.157610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang Y., Chen X., Liu Y., Roth C., Copeland C., McFarlane H. E., et al. (2013). Mitochondrial AtPAM16 is required for plant survival and the negative regulation of plant immunity. Nat. Commun. 4:2558 10.1038/ncomms3558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ichimura K., Casais C., Peck S. C., Shinozaki K., Shirasu K. (2006). MEKK1 is required for MPK4 activation and regulates tissue-specific and temperature-dependent cell death in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 281 36969–36976. 10.1074/jbc.M605319200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Igari K., Endo S., Hibara K., Aida M., Sakakibara H., Kawasaki T., et al. (2008). Constitutive activation of a CC-NB-LRR protein alters morphogenesis through the cytokinin pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 55 14–27. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03466.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jambunathan N., Siani J. M., McNellis T. W. (2001). A humidity-sensitive Arabidopsis copine mutant exhibits precocious cell death and increased disease resistance. Plant Cell 13 2225–2240. 10.1105/tpc.13.10.2225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Jing B., Xu S., Xu M., Li Y., Li S., Ding J., et al. (2011). Brush and spray: a high-throughput systemic acquired resistance assay suitable for large-scale genetic screening. Plant Physiol. 157 973–980. 10.1104/pp.111.182089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Jones J. D., Dangl J. L. (2006). The plant immune system. Nature 444 323–329. 10.1038/nature05286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Jurkowski G. I., Smith R. K., Jr., Yu I. C., Ham J. H., Sharma S. B., Klessig D. F., et al. (2004). Arabidopsis DND2, a second cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel gene for which mutation causes the “defense, no death” phenotype. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 17 511–520. 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.5.511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kachroo A., Lapchyk L., Fukushige H., Hildebrand D., Klessig D., Kachroo P. (2003). Plastidial fatty acid signaling modulates salicylic acid–and jasmonic acid–mediated defense pathways in the Arabidopsis ssi2 mutant. Plant Cell 15 2952–2965. 10.1105/tpc.017301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kachroo P., Kachroo A., Lapchyk L., Hildebrand D., Klessig D. F. (2003). Restoration of defective cross talk in ssi2 mutants: role of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and fatty acids in SSI2-mediated signaling. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 16 1022–1029. 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.11.1022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kemmerling B., Schwedt A., Rodriguez P., Mazzotta S., Frank M., Qamar S. A., et al. (2007). The BRI1-associated kinase 1, BAK1, has a brassinolide-independent role in plant cell-death control. Curr. Biol. 17 1116–1122. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kim S. H., Gao F., Bhattacharjee S., Adiasor J. A., Nam J. C., Gassmann W. (2010). The Arabidopsis resistance-like gene SNC1 is activated by mutations in SRFR1 and contributes to resistance to the bacterial effector AvrRps4. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1001172 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kong L., Cheng J., Zhu Y., Ding Y., Meng J., Chen Z., et al. (2015). Degradation of the ABA co-receptor ABI1 by PUB12/13 U-box E3 ligases. Nat. Commun. 6:8630 10.1038/ncomms9630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kong Q., Qu N., Gao M., Zhang Z., Ding X., Yang F., et al. (2012). The MEKK1-MKK1/MKK2-MPK4 kinase cascade negatively regulates immunity mediated by a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24 2225–2236. 10.1105/tpc.112.097253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Li W., Ahn I. P., Ning Y., Park C. H., Zeng L., Whitehill J. G., et al. (2012). The U-Box/ARM E3 ligase PUB13 regulates cell death, defense, and flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 159 239–250. 10.1104/pp.111.192617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Li X., Clarke J. D., Zhang Y., Dong X. (2001). Activation of an EDS1-mediated R-gene pathway in the snc1 mutant leads to constitutive, NPR1-independent pathogen resistance. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 14 1131–1139. 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.10.1131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Li Y., Li S., Bi D., Cheng Y. T., Li X., Zhang Y. (2010a). SRFR1 negatively regulates plant NB-LRR resistance protein accumulation to prevent autoimmunity. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1001111 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Li Y., Tessaro M., Li X., Zhang Y. (2010b). Regulation of the expression of plant resistance gene SNC1 by a protein with a conserved BAT2 domain. Plant Physiol. 153 1425–1434. 10.1104/pp.110.156240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Liebrand T. W., van den Burg H. A., Joosten M. H. (2014). Two for all: receptor-associated kinases SOBIR1 and BAK1. Trends Plant Sci. 19 123–132. 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Liu J., Ding P., Sun T., Nitta Y., Dong O., Huang X., et al. (2013). Heterotrimeric G proteins serve as a converging point in plant defense signaling activated by multiple receptor-like kinases. Plant Physiol. 161 2146–2158. 10.1104/pp.112.212431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu Y., Huang X., Li M., He P., Zhang Y. (2016). Loss-of-function of Arabidopsis receptor-like kinase BIR1 activates cell death and defense responses mediated by BAK1 and SOBIR1. New Phytol. 212 637–645. 10.1111/nph.14072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Lu D., Lin W., Gao X., Wu S., Cheng C., Avila J., et al. (2011). Direct ubiquitination of pattern recognition receptor FLS2 attenuates plant innate immunity. Science 332 1439–1442. 10.1126/science.1204903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lu H., Rate D. N., Song J. T., Greenberg J. T. (2003). ACD6, a novel ankyrin protein, is a regulator and an effector of salicylic acid signaling in the Arabidopsis defense response. Plant Cell 15 2408–2420. 10.1105/tpc.015412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Lu H., Salimian S., Gamelin E., Wang G., Fedorowski J., LaCourse W., et al. (2009). Genetic analysis of acd6-1 reveals complex defense networks and leads to identification of novel defense genes in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 58 401–412. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03791.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mackey D., Belkhadir Y., Alonso J. M., Ecker J. R., Dangl J. L. (2003). Arabidopsis RIN4 is a target of the type III virulence effector AvrRpt2 and modulates RPS2-mediated resistance. Cell 112 379–389. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00040-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Mackey D., Holt B. F., Wiig A., Dangl J. L. (2002). RIN4 interacts with Pseudomonas syringae type III effector molecules and is required for RPM1-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis. Cell 108 743–754. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00661-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Miya A., Albert P., Shinya T., Desaki Y., Ichimura K., Shirasu K., et al. (2007). CERK1, a LysM receptor kinase, is essential for chitin elicitor signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 19613–19618. 10.1073/pnas.0705147104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Monaghan J., Zipfel C. (2012). Plant pattern recognition receptor complexes at the plasma membrane. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15 349–357. 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Morita-Yamamuro C., Tsutsui T., Sato M., Yoshioka H., Tamaoki M., Ogawa D., et al. (2005). The Arabidopsis gene CAD1 controls programmed cell death in the plant immune system and encodes a protein containing a MACPF domain. Plant Cell Physiol. 46 902–912. 10.1093/pcp/pci095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Nakagami H., Soukupova H., Schikora A., Zarsky V., Hirt H. (2006). A Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase mediates reactive oxygen species homeostasis in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 281 38697–38704. 10.1074/jbc.M605293200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Nie H., Zhao C., Wu G., Wu Y., Chen Y., Tang D. (2012). SR1, a calmodulin-binding transcription factor, modulates plant defense and ethylene-induced senescence by directly regulating NDR1 and EIN3. Plant Physiol. 158 1847–1859. 10.1104/pp.111.192310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Noutoshi Y., Ito T., Seki M., Nakashita H., Yoshida S., Marco Y., et al. (2005). A single amino acid insertion in the WRKY domain of the Arabidopsis TIR-NBS-LRR-WRKY-type disease resistance protein SLH1 (sensitive to low humidity 1) causes activation of defense responses and hypersensitive cell death. Plant J. 43 873–888. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02500.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Noutoshi Y., Kuromori T., Wada T., Hirayama T., Kamiya A., Imura Y., et al. (2006). Loss of necrotic spotted lesions 1 associates with cell death and defense responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 62 29–42. 10.1007/s11103-006-9001-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Palma K., Thorgrimsen S., Malinovsky F. G., Fiil B. K., Nielsen H. B., Brodersen P., et al. (2010). Autoimmunity in Arabidopsis acd11 is mediated by epigenetic regulation of an immune receptor. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1001137 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Palma K., Zhang Y., Li X. (2005). An importin alpha homolog, MOS6, plays an important role in plant innate immunity. Curr. Biol. 15 1129–1135. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Palma K., Zhao Q., Cheng Y. T., Bi D., Monaghan J., Cheng W., et al. (2007). Regulation of plant innate immunity by three proteins in a complex conserved across the plant and animal kingdoms. Genes Dev. 21 1484–1493. 10.1101/gad.1559607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Petersen M., Brodersen P., Naested H., Andreasson E., Lindhart U., Johansen B., et al. (2000). Arabidopsis map kinase 4 negatively regulates systemic acquired resistance. Cell 103 1111–1120. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00213-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Petutschnig E. K., Stolze M., Lipka U., Kopischke M., Horlacher J., Valerius O., et al. (2014). A novel Arabidopsis CHITIN ELICITOR RECEPTOR KINASE 1 (CERK1) mutant with enhanced pathogen-induced cell death and altered receptor processing. New Phytol. 204 955–967. 10.1111/nph.12920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Qiu J. L., Zhou L., Yun B. W., Nielsen H. B., Fiil B. K., Petersen K., et al. (2008). Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases MKK1 and MKK2 have overlapping functions in defense signaling mediated by MEKK1, MPK4, and MKS1. Plant Physiol. 148 212–222. 10.1104/pp.108.120006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Rate D. N., Cuenca J. V., Bowman G. R., Guttman D. S., Greenberg J. T. (1999). The gain-of-function Arabidopsis acd6 mutant reveals novel regulation and function of the salicylic acid signaling pathway in controlling cell death, defenses, and cell growth. Plant Cell 11 1695–1708. 10.2307/3871047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Rodriguez E., El Ghoul H., Mundy J., Petersen M. (2016). Making sense of plant autoimmunity and ’negative regulators’. FEBS J. 283 1385–1391. 10.1111/febs.13613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Shah J., Kachroo P., Nandi A., Klessig D. F. (2001). A recessive mutation in the Arabidopsis SSI2 gene confers SA-and NPR1-independent expression of PR genes and resistance against bacterial and oomycete pathogens. Plant J. 25 563–574. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00992.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Shirano Y., Kachroo P., Shah J., Klessig D. F. (2002). A gain-of-function mutation in an Arabidopsis Toll Interleukin1 receptor-nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat type R gene triggers defense responses and results in enhanced disease resistance. Plant Cell 14 3149–3162. 10.1105/tpc.005348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Sohn K. H., Segonzac C., Rallapalli G., Sarris P. F., Woo J. Y., Williams S. J., et al. (2014). The nuclear immune receptor RPS4 is required for RRS1 SLH1-dependent constitutive defense activation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 10:e1004655 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Suarez-Rodriguez M. C., Adams-Phillips L., Liu Y., Wang H., Su S. H., Jester P. J., et al. (2007). MEKK1 is required for flg22-induced MPK4 activation in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol. 143 661–669. 10.1104/pp.106.091389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Tateda C., Zhang Z., Greenberg J. T. (2015). Linking pattern recognition and salicylic acid responses in Arabidopsis through ACCELERATED CELL DEATH6 and receptors. Plant Signal. Behav. 10:e1010912 10.1080/15592324.2015.1010912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Wan J., Zhang X. C., Neece D., Ramonell K. M., Clough S., Kim S. Y., et al. (2008). A LysM receptor-like kinase plays a critical role in chitin signaling and fungal resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20 471–481. 10.1105/tpc.107.056754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Wang S., Gu Y., Zebell S. G., Anderson L. K., Wang W., Mohan R., et al. (2014). A noncanonical role for the CKI-RB-E2F cell-cycle signaling pathway in plant effector-triggered immunity. Cell Host Microbe 16 787–794. 10.1016/j.chom.2014.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Wang Y., Zhang Y., Wang Z., Zhang X., Yang S. (2013). A missense mutation in CHS1, a TIR-NB protein, induces chilling sensitivity in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 75 553–565. 10.1111/tpj.12232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Xia S. T., Cheng Y. T., Huang S., Win J., Soards A., Jinn T. L., et al. (2013). Regulation of transcription of nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat-encoding genes SNC1 and RPP4 via H3K4 trimethylation. Plant Physiol. 162 1694–1705. 10.1104/pp.113.214551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Xu F., Huang Y., Li L., Gannon P., Linster E., Huber M., et al. (2015). Two N-terminal acetyltransferases antagonistically regulate the stability of a nod-like receptor in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27 1547–1562. 10.1105/tpc.15.00173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Xu F., Xu S. H., Wiermer M., Zhang Y. L., Li X. (2012). The cyclin L homolog MOS12 and the MOS4-associated complex are required for the proper splicing of plant resistance genes. Plant J. 70 916–928. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04906.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Xu S., Zhang Z., Jing B., Gannon P., Ding J., Xu F., et al. (2011). Transportin-SR is required for proper splicing of resistance genes and plant immunity. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002159 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Yang H., Shi Y., Liu J., Guo L., Zhang X., Yang S. (2010). A mutant CHS3 protein with TIR-NB-LRR-LIM domains modulates growth, cell death and freezing tolerance in a temperature-dependent manner in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 63 283–296. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04241.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Yang S., Hua J. (2004). A haplotype-specific resistance gene regulated by BONZAI1 mediates temperature-dependent growth control in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16 1060–1071. 10.1105/tpc.020479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Yang Y., Zhang Y., Ding P., Johnson K., Li X., Zhang Y. (2012). The ankyrin-repeat transmembrane protein BDA1 functions downstream of the receptor-like protein SNC2 to regulate plant immunity. Plant Physiol. 159 1857–1865. 10.1104/pp.112.197152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Yoshioka K., Kachroo P., Tsui F., Sharma S. B., Shah J., Klessig D. F. (2001). Environmentally sensitive, SA-dependent defense responses in the cpr22 mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 26 447–459. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.2641039.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Yoshioka K., Moeder W., Kang H. G., Kachroo P., Masmoudi K., Berkowitz G., et al. (2006). The chimeric Arabidopsis CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE-GATED ION CHANNEL11/12 activates multiple pathogen resistance responses. Plant Cell 18 747–763. 10.1105/tpc.105.038786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Yu I. C., Parker J., Bent A. F. (1998). Gene-for-gene disease resistance without the hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis dnd1 mutant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95 7819–7824. 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Zbierzak A. M., Porfirova S., Griebel T., Melzer M., Parker J. E., Dormann P. (2013). A TIR-NBS protein encoded by Arabidopsis chilling sensitive 1 (CHS1) limits chloroplast damage and cell death at low temperature. Plant J. 75 539–552. 10.1111/tpj.12219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Zhang Y., Cheng Y. T., Bi D., Palma K., Li X. (2005). MOS2, a protein containing G-patch and KOW motifs, is essential for innate immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 15 1936–1942. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhang Y., Cheng Y. T., Qu N., Zhao Q., Bi D., Li X. (2006). Negative regulation of defense responses in Arabidopsis by two NPR1 paralogs. Plant J. 48 647–656. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02903.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Zhang Y., Goritschnig S., Dong X., Li X. (2003). A gain-of-function mutation in a plant disease resistance gene leads to constitutive activation of downstream signal transduction pathways in suppressor of npr1-1, constitutive 1. Plant Cell 15 2636–2646. 10.1105/tpc.015842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Zhang Y., Li X. (2005). A putative nucleoporin 96 is required for both basal defense and constitutive resistance responses mediated by suppressor of npr1-1, constitutive 1. Plant Cell 17 1306–1316. 10.1105/tpc.104.029926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Zhang Y., Yang Y., Fang B., Gannon P., Ding P., Li X. (2010). Arabidopsis snc2-1D activates receptor-like protein-mediated immunity transduced through WRKY70. Plant Cell 22 3153–3163. 10.1105/tpc.110.074120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhang Z., Feechan A., Pedersen C., Newman M. A., Qiu J. L., Olesen K. L., et al. (2007). A SNARE-protein has opposing functions in penetration resistance and defence signalling pathways. Plant J. 49 302–312. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02961.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhang Z., Lenk A., Andersson M. X., Gjetting T., Pedersen C., Nielsen M. E., et al. (2008). A lesion-mimic syntaxin double mutant in Arabidopsis reveals novel complexity of pathogen defense signaling. Mol. Plant 1 510–527. 10.1093/mp/ssn011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhang Z., Liu Y., Ding P., Li Y., Kong Q., Zhang Y. (2014). Splicing of receptor-like kinase-encoding SNC4 and CERK1 is regulated by two conserved splicing factors that are required for plant immunity. Mol. Plant 7 1766–1775. 10.1093/mp/ssu103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Zhang Z., Wu Y., Gao M., Zhang J., Kong Q., Liu Y., et al. (2012). Disruption of PAMP-induced MAP kinase cascade by a Pseudomonas syringae effector activates plant immunity mediated by the NB-LRR protein SUMM2. Cell Host Microbe 11 253–263. 10.1016/j.chom.2012.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Zhou F., Menke F. L., Yoshioka K., Moder W., Shirano Y., Klessig D. F. (2004). High humidity suppresses ssi4-mediated cell death and disease resistance upstream of MAP kinase activation, H2O2 production and defense gene expression. Plant J. 39 920–932. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02180.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Zhu Z., Xu F., Zhang Y., Cheng Y. T., Wiermer M., Li X., et al. (2010). Arabidopsis resistance protein SNC1 activates immune responses through association with a transcriptional corepressor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 13960–13965. 10.1073/pnas.1002828107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES