Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Nov 17;6:37288. doi: 10.1038/srep37288

Plasma selenium levels and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional analysis

Zhen Yang 1,*, Chonghuai Yan 2,*, Gang Liu 3, Yixin Niu 1, Weiwei Zhang 1, Shuai Lu 4, Xiaoyong Li 1, Hongmei Zhang 1, Guang Ning 5, Jiangao Fan 6, Li Qin 1,4,a, Qing Su 1,b
PMCID: PMC5112507  PMID: 27853246

Abstract

Selenium exposure can induce liver insulin resistance and increased liver triglyceride concentrations in animals, which may link to an increased risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, epidemiological studies investigating the association between elevated plasma selenium levels and NAFLD were not available. We aimed to investigate the association of selenium levels with the prevalence of NAFLD in Chinese adults. This was a cross-sectional study of 8550 Chinese adults aged 40 yr or older in Shanghai, China. A questionnaire, anthropometric measurements, and laboratory tests were conducted. NAFLD was diagnosed by hepatic ultrasound after the exclusion of alcohol abuse and other liver diseases. Plasma selenium concentration was assessed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. The median concentration of plasma selenium was 213.0 μg/L. Elevated plasma selenium levels were associated with higher triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol, fasting plasma glucose, post-loading plasma glucose, A1c, HOMA-IR, as well as ALT, AST and γ-GT (all P < 0.05). The odds ratios were substantially higher for NAFLD (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.13–2.18) in the highest selenium quartile compared with those in the lowest quartile, after adjustment for potential cofounder. The results of this study provided epidemiological evidence that increased plasma selenium level is associated with elevated prevalence of NAFLD.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterized by excessive hepatic fat accumulation of patients who have no history of alcohol abuse1. NAFLD is strongly linked to insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes and obesity, being prevalent in up to 95% of obese patients and up to 70% of people with type 2 diabetes2. It is reported that NAFLD affects about 30% of the general population in Western countries3. The prevalence of NAFLD is increasing in China because of the westernization of the lifestyle, such as a high-fat and high-calorie diet and less physical activity. A recent epidemiological study revealed that in a Chinese population, the prevalence of NAFLD is 23.3%4, which indicates that not only in the Western population, but also in the relatively leaner Chinese population, NAFLD is highly epidemic. Although excess energy intake and sedentary lifestyle are well-recognized risk factors for NAFLD, growing evidence has suggested that environmental exposures may contribute to the pathogenesis of NAFLD5,6,7,8,9.

As an essential trace element in human nutrition, selenium is widely distributed in nature in most rocks, soils and sediment. Most processed selenium is used in the electronics industry, glass industry and as a component of pigments in plastics, paints, enamels, inks, and rubber10,11,12. Moreover, selenium can be released into ambient air and soil when burning coal, fuel oil and waste or discharging sewage13,14,15,16,17. Therefore, the general public are exposed to selenium from air, foods and drinking water18,19,20,21. Other sources of selenium exposure may come from use of selenium nutritional supplementation and antidandruff shampoos22,23,24. Most of the selenium that enters the body quickly leaves the body, usually within 24 hours25. Beyond what the body needs, selenium leaves mainly in the urine, but also in feces and breath. Selenium can build up in the human body, however, if exposure levels are very high or if exposure occurs over a long time. The amount that builds up in the body depends on the chemical form of the selenium. It builds up mostly in the liver and kidneys but also in the blood, lungs, heart, and testes26.

The trace mineral selenium is essential for human health. Previous studies have demonstrated selenium play a pivotal role in redox homeostasis, thyroid hormone metabolism, and protection from oxidative stress and inflammation27. Some canonical medical guidance are suggesting people to use the selenium as a dietary supplement daily for preventing cell-damage from the free radicals27. However, more recently, findings from observational epidemiological studies and randomized clinical trials have raised concern that high selenium exposure may lead to metabolism abnormalities, including dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes or insulin resistance28.

To date, it remains largely unclear whether elevated circulating level is associated with NAFLD risk in humans. Several animal studies have indicated that selenium exposure can induce increased serum liver enzyme levels, activation of Kupffer cells, higher liver insulin resistance and higher liver triglyceride concentrations than controls29,30,31. Therefore, evidence from animals suggest that selenium exposure may be associated with the developing of NAFLD. However, evidence from human studies is scarce regarding whether selenium exposure is associated with NAFLD. In this study, we investigated the levels of plasma selenium in a Chinese population and analyzed its association with NAFLD.

Results

The median concentration of plasma selenium was 213 μg/L (interquartile range: 181.6–247.4 μg/L) in this study. As shown in Table 1, participants with higher plasma selenium concentrations were more likely to be current smokers (P < 0.01) and higher waist circumference (P < 0.01), systolic blood pressure (P < 0.01). Furthermore, participants with increased plasma selenium concentration tended to have elevated levels of triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, fasting plasma glucose, post-loading plasma glucose, HbA1c, and HOMA-IR, as well as ALT, AST and γ-GT (all P for trend < 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of participants according to plasma selenium quartiles.

  Q1: <181.6 μg/L Q2: 181.6–213.0 μg/L Q3: 213.0–247.4 μg/L Q4: >247.4 μg/L P for trend
Selenium (mg/l) 0.16 (0.15–0.17) 0.20 (0.19–0.21) 0.23 (0.22–0.24) 0.27 (0.26–0.30) <0.001
Age (years) 56.1 ± 8.0 55.8 ± 8.0 56.1 ± 7.8 56.3 ± 7.9 0.26
Female (62.8) (69.5) (66.2) (64.2) 0.35
Current smokers (15.6) (12.8) (14.1) (19.9) <0.001
Physical activity         0.97
Low (72.5) (71.4) (70.2) (73.1)  
Moderate (21.4) (19.8) (20.3) (19.4)  
High (6.1) (8.8) (9.5) (7.5)  
Body mass index (kg/m2) 24.7 ± 3.5 24.5 ± 3.4 24.3 ± 3.2 24.8 ± 3.8 0.27
Waist circumference (cm) 83.2 ± 9.5 83.3 ± 9.5 83.7 ± 9.6 84.9 ± 9.8 0.005
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 129.5 ± 20.3 131.8 ± 17.8 130.2 ± 17.9 134.5 ± 21.2 0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 81.8 ± 10.8 81.0 ± 10.6 80.1 ± 10.8 81.2 ± 11.1 0.28
Triglycerides (mmol/l) 1.32 (0.91–1.84) 1.34 (1.00–2.10) 1.47 (1.01–2.22) 1.57 (1.07–2.39) <0.001
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) 4.89 ± 0.92 4.72 ± 0.99 4.88 ± 0.98 4.94 ± 0.97 0.01
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.29 ± 0.32 1.27 ± 0.32 1.30 ± 0.31 1.28 ± 0.31 0.76
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/l) 2.63 ± 0.75 2.69 ± 0.78 2.73 ± 0.76 2.73 ± 0.76 0.034
Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l) 6.23 ± 1.35 6.28 ± 1.95 6.41 ± 1.90 6.71 ± 2.25 <0.001
Post-loading plasma glucose (mmol/l) 8.52 ± 3.59 8.72 ± 3.67 8.93 ± 3.96 9.57 ± 4.32 <0.001
Hemoglobin A1c (%) 5.6 (5.3–6.0) 5.9 (5.5–6.4) 6.1 (5.7–6.5) 6.2 (5.8–6.7) <0.001
HOMA-IR 1.66 (1.19–2.50) 1.68 (1.21–2.58) 1.74 (1.27–2.65) 1.82 (1.29–2.90) <0.001
C-reactive protein (mg/l) 1.37 (0.55–3.41) 1.49 (0.62–3.67) 1.55 (0.64–3.65) 1.43 (0.53–3.39) 0.57
eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2) 121.1 ± 25.0 122.2 ± 24.2 120.6 ± 20.5 121.8 ± 22.9 0.34
ALT (U/L) 14 (10–20) 15 (11–20) 16 (12–21) 17 (12–23) <0.001
AST (U/L) 20 (16–24) 21 (17–25) 21 (18–26) 22 (19–27) <0.001
γ-GT (U/L) 19 (13–31) 20 (14–32) 21 (14–34) 22 (15–40) <0.001
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: Q, quartile; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; γ-GT, γ-glutamyltranspeptidase.

Data are means ± s.d. or medians (interquartile ranges) or numbers (proportions).

Compared with those without NAFLD, participants with NAFLD had elevated plasma selenium concentration (median: 270.2 μg/L in NAFLD vs 192.5 μg/L in non-NAFLD subjects, P < 0.01) (Table 2). The ORs (95% CIs) for NAFLD from the lowest to the highest plasma selenium quartiles were 1.29 (0.99–1.77), 1.79 (1.26–2.37) and 1.60 (1.17–2.18), respectively (referencing to 1.00) (P for trend < 0.001) (Table 3), after adjusting for age, gender (model 1). The selenium-NAFLD association was not materially changed (P for trend < 0.001) by further controlling for lifestyle covariates (model 2), as well as additionally adjusting for waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, post-loading plasma glucose, HOMA-IR, lipid profiles and estimated glomerular filtration rate (log-transformed) (model 3) and liver enzyme profiles and CRP (model 4) (all P for trends <0.001). A positive log-linear dose–response relationship was evident in the cubic spline regression model (Fig. 1, P < 0.01 for linearity).

Table 2. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of NAFLD and control subjects.

  Without NAFLD group (n = 5118) NAFLD group (n = 3732) P value
Age (years) 55.4 ± 7.9 57.0 ± 7.3 <0.001
Sex (male/female) 1749/3069 990/2742 <0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 128.4 ± 19.3 133.6 ± 18.5 <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 79.1 ± 10.3 82.0 ± 10.0 <0.001
Waist circumference (cm) 81.2 ± 10.3 89.2 ± 8.6 <0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2) 23.3 ± 3.0 26.4 ± 6.2 <0.001
Triglycerides (mmol/l) 1.1 (0.9–1.6) 1.8 (1.4–2.6) <0.001
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) 4.6 ± 0.9 4.8 ± 1.1 <0.001
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.29 ± 0.33 1.14 ± 0.27 <0.001
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/l) 2.54 ± 0.76 2.69 ± 0.80 <0.001
Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l) 6.0 ± 1.5 6.6 ± 2.0 <0.001
Post-loading plasma glucose (mmol/l) 7.8 ± 3.3 9.8 ± 4.3 <0.001
HbA1c (%) 5.8 ± 0.8 6.2 ± 1.0 <0.001
HOMA-IR 1.5 (1.1–1.9) 2.5 (1.8–3.4) <0.001
C-reactive protein (mg/l) 1.45 (0.56–3.47) 1.51 (0.63–3.79) <0.001
eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2) 124.9 (110.6–140.3) 121.3 (106.9–135.8) <0.001
ALT (U/l) 14.3 ± 10.1 21.4 ± 15.6 <0.001
AST (U/l) 19.3 ± 8.8 22.5 ± 12.3 <0.001
γ-GT (U/l) 24.0 ± 28.1 37.2 ± 48.3 <0.001
Selenium (μg/L) 192.5 (182.3–203.9) 270.2 (256.4–288.5) <0.001
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; γ-GT, γ-glutamyltranspeptidase.

Data are means ± s.d. or medians (interquartile ranges) or numbers (proportions).

Table 3. Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease according to quartiles of plasma selenium concentrations.

  Quartile 1 Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4 P for trend
<181.6 μg/L 181.6–213 μg/L 213.1–247.4 μg/L >247.4 μg/L
No. cases/participants 613/2212 809/2213 1145/2212 1165/2213  
Model 1a 1 1.29 (0.99–1.77) 1.79 (1.26–2.37) 1.60 (1.17–2.18) <0.001
Model 2b 1 1.29 (0.98–1.78) 1.75 (1.22–2.34) 1.58 (1.15–2.18) <0.001
Model 3c 1 1.24 (0.96–1.77) 1.70 (1.16–2.32) 1.52 (1.11–2.14) <0.001
Model 4d 1 1.27 (0.95–1.77) 1.72 (1.19–2.33) 1.54 (1.13–2.18) <0.001
Open in a new tab

aModel 1: adjusted for age, gender.

bModel 2: additionally adjusted for BMI, current smoking status, drinking status, physical activity.

cModel 3: additionally adjusted for waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, post-loading plasma glucose, HOMA-IR, lipid profiles and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

dModel 4: additionally adjusted for liver enzyme profiles and C-reactive protein.

Figure 1. Odds ratio of nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases by log-transformed plasma selenium concentrations.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Lines represent odds ratios (95% CI) based on restricted cubic splines for log-transformed plasma selenium concentrations with knots at the 5th, 50th and 95th percentiles. Odds ratios were estimated using a logistic regression model after adjustment for age, gender, BMI, current smoking status, physical activity, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, post-loading plasma glucose, HOMA-IR, lipid profiles, estimated glomerular filtration rate and C-reactive protein; P for linear <0.01. Bars represent the numbers of participants, 6 equally sized bins were selected from the 1st to the 99th percentiles of log-transformed selenium distribution.

When plasma selenium concentration was considered as a continuous variable, the overall OR (95% CI) of having NAFLD was 1.29 (1.08–1.65) per unit increment of log-transformed selenium concentration. In the stratified analyses, the selenium-NAFLD association was slightly stronger in non-smokers and individuals with lower physical activity levels as compared with their counterparts (Fig. 2). However, no interaction was detected with any of the variables (all P for interaction > 0.10).

Figure 2. Stratified analyses of the associations [odds ratio (95% confidence interval)] between plasma selenium concentrations and nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

aAdjusted for age, gender, BMI, current smoking status, physical activity, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, post-loading plasma glucose, HOMA-IR, lipid profiles, estimated glomerular filtration rate and C-reactive protein, stratifying factors excepted.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first population-based study showing that elevated plasma selenium concentrations were associated with an increased risk of having NAFLD. The association was independent of traditional NAFLD risk factors including lifestyle, BMI, lipid profiles and inflammatory biomarkers.

China has areas of both selenium deficiency and excess27. The geochemistry and human health impacts of trace elements selenium have been intensively studied in China, in terms of geochemical sources, distribution, and health impact32. The diseases (including Keshan disease and Kashin-Beck disease) were related to the deficiency of selenium in the low-selenium geological belt with selenium contents in soil stretching from northeast to southwest of China, while southeast of China in the rich-selenium geological belt32. The sample collection area of this study located in southeast of China. The median concentration of plasma selenium in our population was 213 μg/L. In most previously published studies, plasma selenium values, however, varied from 41 to 210 μg/L among people who living in New Zealand, Canada, Finland, Italy, South Africa and USA33,34,35,36,37,38. Currently, there is no internationally acceptable value or range for plasma selenium concentration in the general population. Thus, it remains to be elucidated whether or to what extent the discrepancies regarding plasma selenium concentrations could be explained by its exposure levels, effects of genetic predisposition and other predisposing factors on its metabolism39, between-laboratory differences in methods (ICP-MS vselectrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry) and measurement errors, or variations in population characteristics among studies.

For the general population, the primary exposure pathways, in order of decreasing relative proportions, are food, water, and air39. Some studies found high amounts of selenium in foods like nuts, seafood, meats and wheat40. However, we did not observe correlations between plasma selenium concentrations and consumption of rice, wheat or seafood (data not shown). In addition, tobacco smoking is another small but important determinant of selenium status40. Previous studies have demonstrated smokers had lower tissue selenium concentrations than did nonsmokers41,42. In line with this idea, we found that both the median concentration of plasma selenium and the OR for having NAFLD were lower in smokers than in their non-smoking counterparts (Fig. 2). Certainly, more studies are needed to clarify the major sources of selenium exposure and its health outcomes in different populations.

In our study, elevated levels of plasma selenium were associated with not only elevated prevalence of NAFLD, but also increased levels of fasting plasma glucose, post-loading plasma glucose, HbA1C, HOMA-IR, triglycerides, ALT, AST and γ-GT. Limited data suggest that hepatotoxicity can occur in humans following acute oral exposure to sodium selenate, but no definitive studies were located regarding hepatic effects in humans after intermediate or chronic oral exposure to selenium compounds. Tests following an acute poisoning of a 15-year-old girl with sodium selenate revealed abnormally elevated serum bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase43. However, hepatic effects, such as changes in serum liver enzymes or liver morphology (identified by ultrasonography), have not been observed in humans at chronic dietary intakes of selenium44,45. Therefore, more large-scale population-based studies are needed to clarify the role of selenium exposure in the pathogenesis of NAFLD in the future. Evidence from studies in rodent models demonstrated that selenium exposure was more potent in inducing liver damage by activating inflammation and the liver with infiltration by inflammatory cells, increasing hepatic enzymes and accumulation of glycogen and lipid29,30,31.

The underlying mechanism of selenium exposure in the pathogenesis of NAFLD is not yet fully elucidated. SeP (in humans encoded by the SEPP1 gene), a secretory protein primarily produced by the liver46, contains 10 selenocysteine residues and functions as a selenium transporter47. Recently, Misu et al.48 found a positive correlation between hepatic SEPP1 mRNA levels and insulin resistance in humans. Administration of purified SeP impaired insulin signaling and dysregulated glucose metabolism both in vitro and in vivo. In contrast, genetic deletion and RNA interference-mediated knockdown of SeP improved systemic insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance in mice. Moreover, Mueller et al. found that selenium could also raise liver PTP1b activity in rats, which might lead to further deterioration of insulin sensitivity in liver31. In line with views, we observed that HOMA-IR increased with plasma selenium quartiles in this study (P < 0.001), which indicate that high circulating selenium levels is correlated with impaired insulin signaling and could potentially modulate liver insulin resistance. It is well-known that insulin resistance plays a pivotal role in the development of hepatic lipid accumulation. Furthermore, some studies have also observed plasma triglyceride levels in the animals model were increased by the high dietary selenium intake31,49, which indicate supranutritional selenium could induce alterations in molecular targets related to energy metabolism in skeletal muscle and visceral adipose tissue50. Taken together, these important and intriguing results suggest that high selenium may play a causal role in the pathogenesis of liver fat accumulation. However, whether these findings in animal models can explain the association of selenium exposure with NAFLD in humans needs thorough investigations in the future.

To our knowledge, this is the first relatively large-scale population study that has revealed the association of elevated plasma selenium levels with NAFLD. In addition, we have measured a wide spectrum of lifestyle and biochemical risk factors, which allow a careful control for the potential confounding effects in the analyses.

There are several limitations to be considered. First, due to the cross-sectional nature, a causal relationship between selenium and NAFLD cannot be established. There is a possibility that in the condition of some pathological metabolism, such as NAFLD, the selenium could be under retention. Thus, it is critical to carry out prospective studies in the future. Second, ultrasonographic examination was used to determine the presence of NAFLD. However, the sensitivity of liver ultrasonography may vary depending on the hepatic fat content51, although as discussed above, liver ultrasonography offers several strengths including the non-invasive nature of the test. In addition, although the sensitivity of liver ultrasonography may vary with the hepatic fat content, when performed properly, ultrasonography has been reported to detect as little as ≥5% hepatic fat content51. Furthermore, several advantages of ultrasound imaging, including portability, low cost, and simplicity of use, make it further applicable and acceptable for investigating the incidence, prevalence, and risk factors of NAFLD in large-scale populations, particularly in developing countries. Third, given the diagnosis of NAFLD in the present study was based on ultrasound imaging, which means that NAFLD patients in our study were in at least moderate stage of the disease. Therefore, we failed to assess the association between plasma selenium and mild-stage NAFLD in the present study. Finally, it is noteworthy that other environmental confounding factors may affect our conclusions and such factors, if discovered, need to be taken into account in future analyses.

In summary, our study showed for the first time that elevated plasma selenium concentrations were associated with increased prevalence of NAFLD in a Chinese population. From the perspective of public health, it is interesting and important to confirm whether there is a causal role of selenium exposure during the pathogenesis of NAFLD in humans. Therefore, more studies in the general population, particularly with prospective designs, are warranted. Studies are also needed to elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying the relation between elevated plasma selenium levels and NAFLD in humans.

Methods

Study participants and design

In 2011 China a national survey of Risk Evaluation of cAncers in Chinese diabeTic Individuals: a lONgitudinal (REACTION) study, which was conducted among 259,657 adults, aged 40 years and older in 25 communities across mainland China, from 2011 to 201252. The data presented in this article are based on the baseline survey of subsamples from Shanghai in eastern China. All studied individuals came from the Chongming District in Shanghai, China. There were 9930 participants who had complete information about age; sex; smoking and alcohol consumption habits; and a medical history including the use of medications, BMI, and a hepatic ultrasonic examination. Participants meeting the following criteria were excluded: 1) those with a history of known liver diseases such as hepatitis, cirrhosis, or malignancy; 2) those with more than 3 times the normal serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels of the study population; and 3) those with alcohol consumption greater than 140 g/wk for men and 70 g/wk for women. Thus, a total of 8550 participants (2739 men and 5811 women) were eventually included in this analysis (Table 2). The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, and all studies were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

Data collection

Subjects were admitted after an overnight fast of 10 h and underwent a 75-g OGTT. The fasting and OGTT 2-h venous blood samples were collected into a routine tube, respectively, and were immediately processed by centrifugation at 4 °C for 10 min at 3000 relative centrifugal force. Fasting plasma glucose, post-loading plasma glucose, fasting and post-loading serum insulin concentrations, lipids profile including triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase were detected within 1 h of collection. Another anticoagulated venous blood (heparin) was collected for measurement of hemoglobin A1c within 4 h of collection. The smoking was defined as never, current (smoking regularly in the past 6 months), or ever (cessation of smoking for more than 6 months). Physical activity was estimated using the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire by adding questions on frequency and duration of moderate and vigorous activities and walking (Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Available at: http://www.ipaq.ki.se/ (2006)).

Venous plasma glucose level was measured by glucose oxidase method (ADVIA-1650 Chemistry System, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany), hemoglobin A1c was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (BIO-RAD, D10, CA). Fasting insulin was determined by RIA (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO). Serum C-reactive protein was determined by ELISA with Duoset kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Serum creatinine, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase were measured with an autoanalyzer (Hitachi 7080; Tokyo, Japan). The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated according to the equation described by Matthews et al.53. The abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula recalibrated for Chinese was used to estimate glomerular filtration rate expressed in milliliters per minute per 1.73 m2: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) = 186 × [serum creatinine × 0.011]−1.154 × [age]−0.203 × [0.742 if female] × 1.233, where serum creatinine is expressed as micromoles per liter and 1.233 is the adjusting coefficient for Chinese54.

Measurement of plasma selenium concentration

Fasting peripheral venous blood samples were collected by EDTA-contained tubes and centrifuged to separate plasmathen stored at −80 °C until analysis. Each 200 μl of the plasma samples was mixed with 2 ml 2% HNO3. The mixtures were injected into an Agilent 7500ce inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy system (ICP-MS, Agilent Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). All the containers or tubes were pre-cleaned by overnight soaking in ultrapure grade 2% HNO3 solution. Quality control was performed (1 out of 20 samples), and the inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were <10% and <8%, respectively. All participants had plasma selenium levels above the detection limit (0.2526 μg/L).

Definition of NAFLD

Hepatic ultrasonic examination was performed on all participants by two trained ultrasonographists who were blinded to the clinical and laboratory data, using a high-resolution B-mode tomographic ultrasound system (EsaoteBiomedicaSpA, Italy) with a 3.5-MHz probe. Diagnosis of fatty liver by ultrasonography was defined by the presence of at least two of three abnormal findings: diffusely increased echogenicity of the liver relative to the kidney, ultrasound beam attenuation, and poor visualization of intrahepatic structures1. NAFLD was diagnosed by hepatic ultrasound after the exclusion of alcohol abuse and other liver diseases55,56.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of covariance for continuous variables and multivariate logistic regression analysis for categorical variables were applied for the comparison across plasma selenium quartiles. Whenever appropriate, log10 transformations of skewed variables were used in analyses. A logistic regression model was used to test odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) of NAFLD for each plasma selenium quartile compared with the lowest quartile, with adjustment for age (continuous), gender, current smoking status (yes, no), physical activity (low, moderate, high), BMI (continuous), waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, post-loading plasma glucose, HOMA-IR, lipid profiles, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (log-transformed continuous variable).

Tests of linear trend across increasing selenium quartiles were conducted by assigning the median value to each quartile and treating it as a continuous variable. Plasma CRP was further adjusted to test influence of inflammatory status on the association. The log-linear dose-response relationship was estimated by applying a restricted cubic spline regression model with 3 knots at the 5th (140 μg/L), 50th (213 μg/L) and 95th (300 μg/L) percentiles. Stratified analyses were performed according to age (<65, ≥65), sex, current smoking status, diabetes, CRP levels, BMI category (normal weight, overweight and obesity) and physical activity. Likelihood ratio tests were conducted to examine interactions. All statistical analysis were performed with SAS (version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Yang, Z. et al. Plasma selenium levels and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional analysis. Sci. Rep. 6, 37288; doi: 10.1038/srep37288 (2016).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgments

We thank Junxia Liu, Yucheng Li and Yueming Liu for their contributions at various stages of this study. We are also grateful to all study participants for their involvement in the study. This work was supported by Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (15411953200, 10411956600, 14ZR1427400), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81300667, 81370953, 81370935), Shanghai Health System Outstanding Young Talents Training Program (XYQ2013098), Shanghai Education Committee Key Program (14zz110), National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases (2013BAI09B13), National Key New Drug Creation and Manufacturing Program of Ministry of Science and Technology (2012ZX09303006-001) and State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China (2012CB517501).

Footnotes

Author Contributions All authors contributed significantly to this work. Q.S., L.Q. and Z.Y. conceived and designed the study strategy. S.L., Y.Z., X.L. and H.Z. recruited the participants and collected their information and blood samples. Z.Y., C.Y., G.L. and W.Z. performed experiments, collected and analyzed the data. Z.Y. contributed to the writing of the manuscript and preparing the tables and figures. J.F. and G.N. revised of the article for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Fan J. G. & Farrell G. C. Epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in China. J Hepatol 50, 204–210 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anstee Q. M., McPherson S. & Day C. P. How big a problem is non-alcoholic fatty liver disease? BMJ 343, d3897, 10.1136/bmj.d3897 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Farrell G. C. et al. Guidelines for the assessment and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Asia-Pacific region: executive summary. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22, 775–777 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hou X. H. et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease’s prevalence and impact on alanine aminotransferase associated with metabolic syndrome in the Chinese. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26, 722–730 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tan H. H. et al. Kupffer cell activation by ambient air particulate matter exposure may exacerbate non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Immuno toxicol 6, 266–275 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tong M. et al. Nitrosamine exposure causes insulin resistance diseases: relevance to type 2 diabetes mellitus, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 17, 827–844 (2009). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cave M. et al. Polychlorinated biphenyls, lead, and mercury are associated with liver disease in American adults: NHANES 2003–2004. Environ Health Perspect 118, 1735–1742 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kelishadi R. et al. Obesity and air pollution: global risk factors for pediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepat Mon 11, 794–802 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zheng Z. et al. Exposure to ambient particulate matter induces a NASH-like phenotype and impairs hepatic glucose metabolism in an animal model. J Hepatol 58, 148–154 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shamberger R. J. The genotoxicity of selenium. Mutat Res 154, 29–48 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Barceloux D. G. Selenium. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 37, 145–172 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sánchez-Ocampo A., Torres-Pérez J. & Jiménez-Reyes M. Selenium levels in the serum of workers at a rubber tire repair shop. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 57, 72–75 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sun H. J. et al. Arsenic and selenium toxicity and their interactive effects in humans. Environ Int 69, 148–158 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cutter G. et al. Selenium Behavior in San Francisco Bay Sediments. Estuar Coast 35, 646–657 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  15. Fishbein L. Environmental selenium and its significance. Fundam Appl Toxicol 3, 411–419 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tuberville T. D., Scott D. E., Metts B. S., Finger J. W. Jr. & Hamilton M. T. Hepatic and renal trace element concentrations in American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) following chronic dietary exposure to coal fly ash contaminated prey. Environ Pollut 214, 680–689 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Baird R. B., Pourian S. & Gabrielian S. M. Determination of trace amounts of selenium in wastewaters by carbon rod atomization. Anal Chem 44, 1887–1889 (1972). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen J. et al. Atmospheric emissions of F, As, Se, Hg, and Sb from coal-fired power and heat generation in China. Chemosphere 90, 1925–1932 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. John W., Kaifer R., Rahn K. & Wesolowski J. J. Trace element concentrations in aerosols from the San Francisco Bay Area. Atmos Environ 7, 107–118 (1973). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rowe C. L. Bioaccumulation and effects of metals and trace elements from aquatic disposal of coal combustion residues: recent advances and recommendations for further study. Sci Total Environ 485–486, 490–496 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Beale A. M., Fasulo D. A. & Craigmill A. L. Effects of oral and parenteral selenium supplements on residues in meat, milk and eggs. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 115, 125–150 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stranges S. et al. Effects of long-term selenium supplementation on the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 147, 217–223 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stranges S. et al. Effects of selenium supplementation on cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality: secondary analyses in a randomized clinical trial. Am J Epidemiol 163, 694–699 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vinceti M. et al. Long-term mortality patterns in a residential cohort exposed to inorganic seleniumin drinking water. Environ Res 150, 348–356 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Burk R. F., Brown D. G., Seely R. J. & Scaief C. C. 3rd. Influence of dietary and injected selenium on whole-blody retention, route of excretion, and tissue retention of 75SeO3 2- in the rat. J Nutr 102, 1049–1055 (1972). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Thomson C. D., Robinson B. A., Stewart R. D. & Robinson M. F. Metabolic studies of [75Se] selenocystine and [75Se] selenomethionine in the rat. Br J Nutr 34, 501–509 (1975). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rayman M. P. Selenium and human health. Lancet 379, 1256–1268 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stranges S., Navas-Acien A., Rayman M. P. & Guallar E. Selenium status and cardiometabolic health: state of the evidence. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 20, 754–760 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hasegawa T., Taniguchi S., Mihara M., Nakamuro K. & Sayato Y. Toxicity and chemical form of selenium in the liver of mice orally administered selenocystine for 90 days. Arch Toxicol 68, 91–95 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kołodziejczyk L., Put A. & Grzela P. Liver morphology and histochemistry in rats resulting from ingestion of sodium selenite and sodium fluoride. Fluoride 33, 6–16 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  31. Mueller A. S. et al. Redox regulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B by manipulation of dietary selenium affects the triglyceride concentration in rat liver. J Nutr 138, 2328–2336 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li S., Xiao T. & Zheng B. Medical geology of arsenic, selenium and thallium in China. Sci Total Environ 421–422, 31–40 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Salonen J. T., Alfthan G., Huttunen J. K., Pikkarainen J. & Puska P. Association between cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction and serum selenium in a matched-pair longitudinal study. Lancet 2, 175–179 (1982). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lalonde L., Jean Y., Roberts K. D., Chapdelaine A. & Bleau G. Fluorometry of selenium in serum or urine. Clin Chem 28, 172–174 (1982). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Luoma P. V., Näyhä S., Pyy L., Korpela H. & Hassi J. Blood mercury and serum selenium concentrations in reindeer herders in the arctic area of northern Finland. Arch Toxicol Suppl 15, 172–175 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Minoia C. et al. Trace element reference values in tissues from inhabitants of the European community. I. A study of 46 elements in urine, blood and serum of Italian subjects. Sci Total Environ 95, 89–105 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Heese H. D., Lawrence M. A., Dempster W. S. & Pocock F. Reference concentrations of serum selenium and manganese in healthy nulliparas. S Afr Med J 73, 163–165 (1988). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Bleys J. et al. Serum selenium and serum lipids in US adults. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 416–423 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Evans D. M. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies loci affecting blood copper, selenium and zinc. Hum Mol Genet 22, 3998–4006 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Selenium. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service 2003. [PubMed]
  41. Lloyd B., Lloyd R. S. & Clayton B. E. Effect of smoking, alcohol, and other factors on the selenium status of a healthy population. J Epidemiol Community Health 37, 213–217 (1983). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Swanson C. A. et al. Selenium intake, age, gender, and smoking in relation to indices of selenium status of adults residing in a seleniferous area. Am J Clin Nutr 52, 858–862 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Civil I. D. & McDonald M. J. Acute selenium poisoning: case report. N Z Med J 87, 354–356 (1978). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Longnecker M. P. et al. Selenium in diet, blood, and toenails in relation to human health in a seleniferous area. Am J Clin Nutr 53, 1288–1294 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang G. et al. Studies of safe maximal daily dietary Se-intake in a seleniferous area in China. Part II: Relation between Se-intake and the manifestation of clinical signs and certain biochemical alterations in blood and urine. J Trace Elem Electrolytes Health Dis 3, 123–130 (1989). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Carlson B. A. et al. Specific excision of the selenocysteine tRNA[Ser]Sec (Trsp) gene in mouse liver demonstrates an essential role of selenoproteins in liver function. J Biol Chem 279, 8011–8017 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Saito Y. & Takahashi K. Characterization of selenoprotein P as a selenium supply protein. Eur J Biochem 269, 5746–5751 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Misu H. et al. A liver-derived secretory protein, selenoprotein P, causes insulin resistance. Cell Metab 12, 483–495 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Chen C., Hedstrom O. & Whanger P. D. Effect of vitamin B12 on performance and tissue selenium content in rats fed sub-toxic levels of selenite. Toxicology 85, 101–115 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pinto A. et al. Supranutritional selenium induces alterations in molecular targets related to energy metabolism in skeletal muscle and visceral adipose tissue of pigs. J Inorg Biochem 114, 47–54 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Dasarathy S. et al. Validity of real time ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: a prospective study. J Hepatol 51, 1061–1067 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ning G. et al. Risk Evaluation of cAncers in Chinese diabeTic Individuals: a lONgitudinal (REACTION) study. J Diabetes 4, 172–173 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Matthews D. R. et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28, 412–419 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ma Y. C. et al. Modified glomerular filtration rate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 17, 2937–2944 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Bedogni G. et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the Dionysos nutrition and liver study. Hepatology 42, 44–52 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Li Y. et al. Association of serum uric acid level with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study. J Hepatol 50, 1029–1034 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES