Graphical abstract
Abbreviations: DLB, Dementia with Lewy Bodies; AD, Alzheimer’s Disease; ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; NFTs, neurofibrillary tangles; PM, post mortem delay; RαMHA, R-α-methylhistamine; MMSE, Mini Mental State Examination; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale; MCID, Microcomputer Imaging Device
Keywords: Human, DLB, Psychosis, Globus pallidus, Histamine, H3R
Abstract
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a serious age-dependent human neurodegenerative disease, with multiple debilitating symptoms, including dementia, psychosis and significant motor deficits, but with little or no effective treatments. This comparative ligand autoradiographical study has quantified histamine H3 receptors (H3R) in a series of major cortical and basal ganglia structures in human DLB and Alzheimer’s (AD) post-mortem cases using the highly selective radioligand, [3H] GSK189254.
In the main, the levels of H3 receptor were largely preserved in DLB cases when compared with aged-matched controls. However, we provide new evidence showing variable levels in the globus pallidus, and, moreover, raised levels of Pallidum H3 correlated with positive psychotic symptoms, in particular delusions and visual hallucinations, but not symptoms associated with depression. Furthermore, no correlation was detected for H3 receptor levels to MMSE or IUPRS symptom severity.
This study suggests that H3R antagonists have scope for treating the psychotic symptomologies in DLB and other human brain disorders.
1. Introduction
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most prevalent human dementia. This is a seriously debilitating human disease, with multiple prevalent symptoms, including dementia, psychosis (hallucinations and fluctuating consciousness) and significant motor deficits, but with little or no effective treatments [1]. The histaminergic system plays an important role in central nervous system regulation and behaviour through its role as an autoreceptor, regulating the synthesis and release of histamine and as a heteroreceptor, negatively regulating the release of a variety of other key neurotransmitters including acetylcholine, dopamine, glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid [2], [3], [4]; reviewed in [5]. Given its widespread distribution and influence upon multiple neurotransmitter systems, H3 antagonists are promising clinical candidates for the treatment of age-related dementias, such as DLB [6], [7], [8].
There are indications that histamine deficits are present in dementias, such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), however it is unknown whether these are specific to certain brain regions, changes in histamine receptor numbers, or are specific for AD amongst other neurodegenerative disorders. The importance of the histaminergic system in AD is difficult to assess due to a number of conflicting reports. For example, histamine levels in AD brains have been reported to be increased in temporal and frontal cortex, basal ganglia and hippocampus [9]. However, other studies have shown decreases in histamine content in the hypothalamus, hippocampus and temporal cortex [10], [11]. Histaminergic cell bodies are also located in the TMN, where neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) are also found. NFTs are particularly concentrated in the region containing histaminergic perikarya compared with surrounding areas [12], [13] and together with cholinergic basal forebrain nuclei, the TMN has been described as an early affected subcortical nucleus for the presence of NFT [14]. The number of histaminergic cell bodies in the TMN was shown to be similar to that of normal brains [12]. In contrast, another group showed a significant reduction in large-sized histamine containing neurons in the TMN where numerous NFTs were found, indicative of a central histaminergic dysfunction [13]. Histamine decarboxylase (HDC) activity, also a common marker of the histaminergic system, has been shown to be decreased in AD compared with elderly controls [15]. Whilst there are conflicting data about the histamine content in the brain of AD patients, one recent study using a highly selective H3R ligand had shown the level of H3R expression to be unaltered in the late stages of human AD compared to age matched controls, as well as in TASTPM mice (a mouse model of AD) compared with wild type mice [6], [16].
Understanding the molecular structure of the H3R has increased considerably and a number of H3R antagonists have been identified and a few (pitolisant and GSK189254) have entered advanced clinical development focusing on narcolepsy, cognitive and psychotic disorders [8], [18], [19]. The histaminergic system innervates several structures that are known to be involved in cognition such as the basal forebrain, cerebral cortex, cingulate cortex, amygdala and thalamus [20]. High levels of H3R have been shown to be expressed in the cerebral cortex [21], which is densely innervated by cholinergic neurons. In neuropsychiatric disorders such as AD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and schizophrenia, cognitive deficits play a major role in the disease [22]. Increased brain histamine is also positively correlated with age and may play a role in decreasing acetylcholine uptake [23]. It is thought that H3R antagonists may be able to prevent the reduction in acetylcholine through its heteroreceptor characteristic [24], [25], [26]. H3Rs are also highly expressed in the basal ganglia in both rodent and human brains [27], [28], [29].
Ligand autoradiography is a very useful technique to define the topology and quantify receptors in post-mortem brain slices. GSK189254 is derived from a novel benzazepine series of H3R antagonists [6] that are structurally distinct from other recently described non-imidazole H3R antagonists. GSK18925 has been shown to significantly improve performance of rats in diverse cognition paradigms, including passive avoidance, water maze, object recognition and attentional set shift [4], [5]. The data thus far for H3R antagonists point to a possible therapeutic potential for diseases where cognitive deficits are already present such as AD and other dementias, including DLB. These complex brain diseases also display multiple symptoms in addition to dementia which may be targeted through the histaminergic system. In this present study, [3H] GSK189254 was utilised to quantify levels of cortical and basal ganglia H3Rs in normal human aged post-mortem brains, and in a series of DLB and AD cases (the latter for comparative purposes) with detailed connected clinical information.
2. Materials & methods
2.1. Determining the working concentration of [3H] GSK189254 for autoradiography
Saturation binding assays using [3H] GSK189254 were performed essentially as described previously [6], in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7 containing 5 mM EDTA and a concentration range of 0.01–8 nM for radioligand. Non-specific binding was determined using 1 μM R-α-methylhistamine (RαMeH). The assay was terminated by rapid filtration through a Whatman GF/B filters pre-soaked in 10 mM sodium phosphate dibasic pH 7.4, which were washed (3 × 3 ml) using iced cold 10 mM sodium phosphate dibasic pH 7.4, using a Brandell 24-place cell harvester.
[3H] GSK189254 bound selectively to the hH3R vs hH4R, and the two major hH3R isoforms, namely hH3 445 and hH3 365, transiently expressed in HEK293 cells [6], displayed very similar KD values of 0.16 ± 0.04 and 0.24 ± 0.07 nM, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 1). The concentration of radioligand used was, therefore, selected as approximately 2× mean KD to ensure that each autoradiography run detected at least 65% of available receptor binding sites.
2.2. Human case details and diagnostic criteria
All human brain tissue were obtained from Newcastle Brain Tissue Resource Bank LREC (Newcastle and Tyneside) with full ethical approval (2002/295). Frozen tissue was collected at autopsy and 1 cm coronal slices from the left hemisphere were snap frozen in liquid Arcton (ICI) and stored at −70 °C. The sections were then stored at −80 °C. Prior to sectioning, tissue slices were warmed to 15 °C and blocks containing the striatum were sub-dissected and mounted onto cryostat chucks with 8% carboxymethylcellulose. Coronal sections were cryostat sectioned at a thickness of 20 μm using a Brights OTF cryostat onto Vectabond-coated glass slides, air dried for 1–2 h and stored at −80 °C prior to receptor autoradiography. The right hemisphere was used for histopathological examination, following formalin fixation and paraffin embedding. Cortical and hippocampal neurofibrillary tangles were demonstrated using a modification of Palmgren’s silver technique [30] and the von Braunmühl silver impregnation technique [31] was used to identify senile plaques in 25 μm thick frozen sections cut from tissue blocks adjacent to those taken for paraffin processing. Counts of NFTs and neuritic plaque number were made from fields across the entire cortical ribbon, as described in [32]. Lewy-bodies in the substantia nigra were visualised by the use of haematoxylin and eosin staining, cortical Lewy-bodies and dystrophic neuritis were detected using ubiquitin immunohistochemistry on 5 μm thick paraffin embedded sections. Neurones in the substantia nigra were quantified following cresyl fast violet staining of 20 μm thick paraffin sections.
Control cases had no history of psychiatric or neurological disorder and had no neuropathological indications of Lewy-body disease (DLB) or any other neurological disorder. DLB cases were clinically diagnosed by the presence of a progressive cognitive impairment seen in conjunction with at least two of the following symptoms: recurrent visual hallucinations; fluctuating cognition with pronounced variations in attention and alertness; spontaneous motor features of parkinsonism [33]. DLB cases were distinguished from AD by the presence of brain stem and cortical Lewy-bodies, Lewy neurites in the CA2/3 and endplate segments of the hippocampus [33], and by lower or moderate Alzheimer-type pathology with fewer NFT than found in AD.
2.3. Human cases used
The 43 cases selected for this study were cut at the level of the striatum (caudate nucleus and putamen) corresponding to coronal brain levels 9–15 using the Coronal Map of Brodmann Areas in the human Brain [34]. Of the 43 cases, 12 were control cases, 16 DLB cases and 15 AD cases (Table 1). For each case 5 replicates were used to measure 3 total and 2 non-specific radioligand binding.
Table 1.
Summary of 43 human cases.
n = |
Age (years) |
PM Delay (hours) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Females | Males | Range | Mean | SD | Range | Mean | SD | |
Control | 12 | 7 | 5 | 70–91 | 80.92 | 6.97 | 10–96 | 42 | 22.44 |
DLB | 16 | 8 | 8 | 64–87 | 77.13 | 7.19 | 4–60 | 31.56 | 18.18 |
AD | 15 | 9 | 6 | 74–91 | 83.27 | 4.53 | 4–82 | 33.40 | 21.69 |
Summary of the 43 human cases chosen for the study. PM delay = post mortem delay, that is, time between death and freezing of the tissue to allow for post-mortem examination.
Summary of the 43 human cases chosen for the study. PM delay = post mortem delay, that is, time between death and freezing of the tissue to allow for post-mortem examination.
No significant differences were seen with age or PM delay in these cases (p > 0.05). No gross significant differences were seen between the male and female cases in respective groups (p > 0.05) (not shown).
2.4. In vitro autoradiography of human brain tissue using [3H] GSK189254
The autoradiography method used was essentially as described previously [6]. In brief, human brain sections were left to equilibrate to room temperature for 1 h before the protocol commenced. Human sections were incubated in (50 mM Tris, 5 mM EDTA pH 7.7) containing 2 × KD (approximately 0.5 nM) [3H] GSK189254 (specific activity = 81Ci/mmol, stored at −20 °C, gift from Dr Medhurst, GSK, Harlow, UK) for 1 h at RT, until equilibrium is reached. Non-specific binding was defined using 10 μM unlabelled RαMHA. The reaction was terminated by five 3 min washes in 50 mM Tris, 5 mM MgCl pH 7.7, at 4 °C and a final wash in dH2O at 4 °C. Sections were left to dry in a stream of cold air for 1–2 h. The sections were then transferred to X-ray cassettes, each including tritium autoradiographical microscale as calibration standards, and exposed against tritium-sensitive hyperfilm for 6 weeks at 4 °C. The exposed films were then developed in D-19 developer (Kodak, UK) for 5 min at RT, fixed for 6 min in Unifix (Kodak, UK), washed under running water for 20 min and air-dried.
2.5. Image analysis
The resulting brain images on the film were captured using a Dage 72 MTI CCD72S video camera and were quantitatively analysed by computer-assisted densitometry using Microcomputer Imaging Device (MCID Elite) version 7.0 software from imaging research Inc., Ontario, Canada. The radioactive Tritium standards were used to calculate a standard curve for each autoradiogram, which allowed the conversion from optical density values to units of concentrations for each brain region analysed. Non-specific binding tissue sections were present on the same film as each of the corresponding total binding tissue sections for the same case. Specific binding was determined by subtracting mean non-specific binding from mean total binding. Brain structures were identified by reference to the atlas of the Human Brain [34] and the mean and standard deviations for each brain structure in each section were calculated. Inter-assay variability was reduced by using ligand concentrations that were at least twice the ligand affinity, using ligand from the same batch for each autoradiographical run, and by standardising each film using calibration microscales. All sections were then re-analysed and results confirmed by digital autoradiography using a Beta-Imager 2000 instrument (Biospace, Paris, France), radioactivity was measured by counting the number of β particles from delineated areas and the results are expressed as mean specific binding counts per minute per square millimetre (cpm/mm2; n = 12–16 cases per group).
2.6. Symptom analysis
2.6.1. The mini mental state examination (MMSE)
The MMSE, validated and widely used since its creation in 1975, is an effective tool for assessing cognitive mental status. The MMSE is used to detect cognitive impairment and monitor response to treatment. It is an eleven question test covering five areas of cognitive function: orientation, attention/calculation, recall and language, and the ability to follow simple verbal and written commands [35]. A score of 23 or below, from a possible 30 is indicative of cognitive impairment. The test is effective but does have limitations, for example, patients who are hearing and visually impaired or who have low English literacy, or with communication disorders may perform poorly even when cognitively intact [35]. The test provides a total score that places the individual on a scale of cognitive function. The values used in this were those taken at the last assessment before death of the patient.
2.6.2. Unified Parkinson disease rating scale (UPDRS)
The UPDRS is a rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of PD. It is made up of the 1) Mentation, Behaviour and Mood, 2) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and 3) Motor sections. These are evaluated by interview. Some sections require multiple grades assigned to each extremity. A total of 199 points are possible, where 199 represent the worst (total) disability, and 0 represents no disability [36]. The values used in this study were those taken at the last assessment before death of the patient.
Estimated lines of best fit for MMSE and UPDRS correlations were produced using GraphPad Prism and are represented on each graph, indicating any changes in binding levels in each tissue with increasing clinical score. The significance of the regression was determined from the generated p value, where p ≤ 0.05 was considered to show a significant linear relationship between clinical score and binding level.
2.6.3. Other symptom analysis
Data relating to depression, delusions, dementia and visual hallucinations experienced by each subject in life were also studied. The severity of the symptoms experienced were measured on the following scale, 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = severe, and are indicative of the last assessment before death of the subject. In each case and in each tissue investigated, attempts were made to correlate the specific binding levels of [3H] GSK189254 data with a range of relevant clinical data scores. The depression, delusion and visual hallucination scores were displayed: 0 no symptoms and 1+ showing symptoms, giving the mean score ± SD against binding levels in cpm/mm2.
2.7. Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis performed involved correlation analysis and students unpaired t-test, to analyse individual regions of the brain. Graphs and one-way ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc test were constructed using GraphPad Prism version 4. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Human H3R pharmacology of [3H] GSK189254
The selectivity of [3H] GSK189254 for the human H3R 445 in comparison to the closely related human H4R 390 subtype was investigated. No significant binding was observed for the hH4 receptor (Supplementary Fig. 1) Moreover, very similar Kd values (ca. 0.3 nM) for [3H] GSK189254 were observed with two of the most common, in cortical-striatal regions, human H3R isoforms, H3R 445 and H3R 365 expressed alone or in combination in HEK293 cells (Supplementary Fig. 1). A representative digital photographic examplar of specific [3H] GSK189254 binding shows the high levels of specific binding in the human brain slice. Very low non-specific binding (<5%) was achieved with the methodology utilised in this study. High binding levels were detected in various cortical (insular, anterior cingulate) and striatal (caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, nucleus accumbens) regions (Supplementary Fig. 1) all relevant to symptomology of DLB.
3.2. Age-dependence of [3H] GSK189254 binding in control and dementias
DLB cases were first examined for [3H] GSK189254 binding levels in the various cortical and striatal brain regions spanning an age range of 60–80 years. There were no significant age-dependent changes in all brain regions analysed although individual variation was clear (p ≥ 0.1 in all areas) (Fig. 1). A similar lack of change was observed in both control and AD cases over the age-range explored (not shown).
Fig. 1.
Age-dependent specific binding of [3H] GSK189254 in DLB cases (n = 16) in caudate, putamen, anterior cingulate cortex, insular cortex, nucleus accumbens and globus pallidus. No significant change in [3H] GSK189254 binding levels was see with the brain structures investigated (n = number of individual patient cases).
3.3. [3H] GSK189254 binding levels in control and dementia cases
As there were no clear changes in [3H] GSK189254 binding levels across the age-range, the data sets were pooled and a comparison made between controls and the two dementias. No significant differences were observed in the mean binding densities of [3H] GSK189254 binding in all brain regions analysed (Fig. 2). The data were further analysed for gender differences (not shown), similar levels of binding was seen in both female and male cohorts in all brain regions, apart from minor changes in the globus pallidus, indicating little or no evidence for gender bias.
Fig. 2.
[3H] GSK189254 specific binding (cpm/mm2) densities (mean ± SEM for n individual patient cases) for pooled Control, DLB and AD cases for (A) Caudate, (B) Putamen, (C) Cingulate cortex, (D) Insular cortex, (E) external Globus Pallidus, (F) internal Globus Pallidus. No significant differences in binding levels was observed in the brain structures investigated.
3.4. Correlation of [3H] GSK189254 binding levels to cognitive and motor deficits
The clinical data corresponding to DLB and AD cases summarised in Table 1 were further analysed to determine if there were any correlation between [3H]GSK189254 binding and MMSE (mini mental state examination) (Fig. 3) and UPDRS scores (Unified Parkinson disease rating scale) (Fig. 4). There was no significant correlation in the binding densities of [3H] GSK189254 with MMSE score (p ≥ 0.5) in all areas in DLB cases. There was also no significant correlation in the binding densities of [3H] GSK189254 with MMSE score in AD cases analysed in parallel (p ≥ 0.2 in all areas) (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Fig. 3.
MMSE Scale against specific binding cpm/mm2 of [3H] GSK189254 in DLB cases in (A) Caudate, (B) Putamen, (C) Cingulate cortex, (D) Insular cortex, (E) External globus pallidus, (F) Internal globus pallidus. No significant relationship was see with the brain structures investigated (each point is an individual DLB patient case).
Fig. 4.
Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale against specific binding cpm/mm2 of [3H] GSK189254 in DLB cases in (A) Caudate, (B) Putamen, (C) Cingulate cortex, (D) Insular cortex, (E) External globus pallidus, (F) Internal globus pallidus. Each point is an individual DLB patient case.
Moreover, there were also no significant differences in the binding densities of [3H] GSK189254 with increased UPDRS score in DLB (Fig. 4) and AD cases (Supplementary Fig. 3).
3.5. Correlation of [3H] GSK189254 binding levels to affective and psychotic deficits
In many cases investigated, clinical information relating to depression and psychosis symptoms were recorded. There were no significant differences between the H3R binding densities in DLB (Fig. 5) and AD cases (Supplementary Fig. 3). with and without depression in all brain structures investigated.
Fig. 5.
Correlation of Depression score against specific binding cpm/mm2 of [3H] GSK189254 in DLB cases in (G) Nucleus Accumbens, (H) combined Globus Pallidus. No significant correlation was observed between [3H] GSK189254 binding levels and depression scores in all brain structures investigated. N = number of individual Disease cases.
Similarly, there were no significant differences between the H3R binding densities in DLB cases with and without severe delusions, except in the globus pallidus where a significant increase in H3R binding was observed in cases with severe delusions (p < 0.01) (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
Correlation of delusion score against specific binding cpm/mm2 of [3H] GSK189254 in DLB cases in (G) Nucleus Accumbens, (H) combined Globus Pallidus. A significant elevation of [3H] GSK189254 binding sites in the globus pallidus was observed in DLB cases with severe delusion compared to cases lacking delusions (p < 0.05). No significant relationship was oberved with the other brain structures investigated. (n = number of individual patient cases).
There were no significant differences between the H3R binding densities and severity of visual hallucinations, although there is an increased H3R binding in the globus pallidus associated with severe visual hallucinations.
Overall H3R binding in both AD and DLB cases does not show any correlation with MMSE, UPDRS, and depression symptoms in cortical or striatal structures in the human CNS. In contrast, increased H3R binding positively correlated with increased severity of psychotic symptoms (delusions and visual hallucinations) in the globus pallidus in both DLB Fig. 6, Fig. 7 and AD (Supplementary Fig. 4 and 5) cases.
Fig. 7.
Visual hallucination score against specific binding cpm/mm2 of [3H] GSK189254 in DLB cases in (G) Nucleus Accumbens, (H) combined Globus Pallidus. A significant elevation of [3H] GSK189254 in the globus pallidus was observed in DLB cases with visual hallucinations (p < 0.05). No significant relationship was see with the other brain structures investigated (n = number of individual patient cases).
4. Discussion and conclusion
The high affinity and selective H3R antagonist/inverse agonist [3H] GSK189254 provides an ideal tool to visualise and allow quantification of the human histamine H3R. The ligand displays a high affinity for two of the most common human H3R isoforms, and also very low non-specific binding properties, which makes it an ideal ligand autoradiographical tool and a vast improvement on previously utilised radioligands (e.g. RαMethylhistamine and clobenpropit [37]). A range of brain structures implicated in the characteristic symptoms of DLB and AD were investigated. The striatum has a well-known role in planning and modulation of movement pathways, but is also involved in a variety of other cognitive processes involving executive function. The cerebral cortex is involved in many complex brain functions including memory processing, attention, perceptual awareness, language and consciousness. More specifically, the anterior cingulate cortex and globus pallidus are thought to be major neuroanatomical interface between emotion and cognition, and the insular cortex is believed to process convergent information to produce an emotionally relevant context for sensory experience. The main focus of this present study was to determine any changes in the H3R in relation to age and gender in control, DLB and AD cases, and relationship to specific symptoms displayed by the individuals. Several lines of evidence suggest that manipulation of the histamine system may alleviate some of the clinical symptoms of AD and DLB. H3R blockade with antagonist/inverse agonists results in the up-regulation of several neurotransmitters which have been shown to have positive affects upon cognitive deficits in several animal models of dementia (reviewed in [8] and [11]).
Previous ligand autoradiography studies using less selective H3R radioligands have reported high H3R densities in the internal and external segments of the globus pallidus, caudate, putamen and nucleus accumbens with moderate levels in the anterior cingulate and insular cortices [38], [39] which concurs well with the present study. Furthermore, in this present study, no significant differences were observed with age although this was only over the restricted 60–80 age range; changes prior to 60 years of age may have occurred and require further investigation. Using [3H] clobenpropit it was also reported that no significant age-related changes in H3R expression in the basal ganglia occurred in normal ageing, nor did receptor density differ significantly between male and female cases [37]. Therefore, H3R levels does not appear to be grossly altered in the latter stages of normal aging.
H3R binding levels were next determined in DLB to establish whether disease state alters receptor levels. H3R binding densities in both cortical and striatal regions in DLB human cases showed no significant differences in ligand binding with age, which supported previously published data suggesting that the H3R is preserved in two common age-related dementias, namely AD and vascular dementias, in other cortical and limbic regions [40]. This was also confirmed in this present study with different AD cases and different cortical brain structures. Overall, these data suggest that there is no gross decline in H3R population between control and disease cases, providing further evidence for H3R preservation across a range of neurodegenerative diseases. Preclinical trials have already alluded to the prospect of H3R antagonists as a treatment for cognitive impairment. We provide further evidence showing preservation of H3Rs in many cortical and striatal brain regions in AD but also in DLB, promoting the H3R as a viable general target in treating a range of human dementias. This has yet to be realised in the clinic.
The data set produced was further interrogated with respect to selective symptoms present in the dementia cohorts prior to death and relationship to H3R expression. The H3R binding levels were correlated with symptom severity scores from various validated clinical tests. There was no correlation between H3R binding levels and MMSE or UPDRS scores in both DLB and AD cases, indicating that the H3R expression levels in the brain structures investigated do not influence the severity of cognitive and mobility impairment, respectively. The latter is in contrast with reported higher H3R binding levels observed in the motor loop structures, substantia nigra and ventral striatum in PD animal studies (e.g. [41]). These translational discrepancies highlight the importance of promoting more human postmortem and live imaging brain studies. There was a modest overall increase in H3R binding sites with decrease in MMSE score indicative of cognitive function. The increase in H3R binding maybe acting as a compensatory mechanism to counteract changes seen elsewhere in the histaminergic system in severe AD and DLB such as a decrease in frontal cortex H1R in AD [42], and reduced H2R expression in the hippocampus in both AD and DLB cases [35]. The functional consequence of increased H3R density could be a further decrease in cognitive neurotransmitters and hence further exacerbation of cognitive deficits, and so would not be a positive compensatory effect. Alternatively, the increase in H3R binding in brains of individuals with more severe dementia could be simply related to loss of cholinergic neurons. Loss of cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain is one of the most prominent and consistent events occurring in AD [43]. These data support previous literature indicating that higher H3R binding correlated with more severe dementia (MMSE) in AD [16], but this was more pronounced in the pre-frontal cortex.
Now to consider other symptoms present in many of the cases studied. There was no correlation between H3R binding and severity of depression in DLB and AD cases, suggesting that the H3R does not play a major role in depression symptoms associated with AD and DLB. This is consistent with recent studies in depressed and bipolar patients [44], [45]. This lack of correlation held for most brains studied herein in terms of the psychotic symptoms. However, an interesting exception was the globus pallidus, where H3R binding levels positively correlated with presence of significant psychotic symptoms, particularly levels of delusion and, to a lesser extent visual hallucinations, in both DLB and AD cases. DLB cases with moderate to high delusion and visual hallucination scores displayed approximately 40% and 22% higher globus pallidus H3R binding densities, respectively, in comparison to cases lacking such psychotic symptoms. A similar trend was present in AD cases with moderate to high delusion and visual hallucination scores displayed approximately 37% and 14% higher H3R binding densities, respectively in comparison to cases lacking such psychotic symptoms. It has been previously reported that the globus pallidus is spared of pathology in Lewy body diseases, DLB and PDD [46]. However, the volume of the human globus pallidus has also been positively correlated with the severity of global psychotic symptoms, as measured by both the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms and Positive Symptoms [47], which may account for this apparent increase in the H3R. This finding was more profound in the DLB cases than AD cases and this is to be expected since DLB cases have generally more pronounced psychotic symptomology than AD cases. H3R expression has been shown to be altered in patients with Schizophrenia and is thought to be involved in the underlying neuropathology [48]. The study showed significantly higher histamine H3R radioligand binding sites in the prefrontal cortex of the schizophrenic group and bipolar subjects with psychotic symptoms, and higher H3R binding correlated with psychotic symptoms, as seen in this present study [48]. H3Rs in the human prefrontal cortex is thought to be involved in the modulation of cognition and emotional behaviours, and this is supported by findings in animals that H3R antagonists enhance prepulse inhibition and cognitive performance [49], [50], [51]. Early promise with pitolisant, a H3R antagonist/inverse agonist for the psychotic symptoms in schizophrenic patients [18], [19], has not been confirmed with another H3R antagonist, ABT-288 [17], with a distinct pharmacokinetic profile. Such studies are still lacking, however, in Lewy body dementia patients, DLB and PDD. The main limitation common to this type of study lies in the relatively small number of cases investigated. The quality of the case tissue and respective clinical information from a leading DLB brain bank centre is a strength of this study, but naturally, further studies are required to confirm these interesting findings utilizing cases from other international brain banks. Furthermore, future studies are also required to probe other key brain structures implicated in psychotic symptoms in DLB and PDD cases.
In conclusion, the key novel findings were the general preservation or elevated levels of the H3R in both normal ageing humans and in the two major human dementia disorders in a variety of cortical and striatal brain structures. This study reports, for the first time, the globus pallidus as a potential new player in the neuropathology of Dementias, particularly those with psychotic symptomologies such as DLB, and as a potentially new target for histaminergic clinical manipulation.
Conflict of interest
None.
Acknowledgements
This article is dedicated to the memory of Sheila Chazot. We would like to thank Dr Margaret Piggott (formally lead scientist at Newcastle University and the Newcastle brain bank, and Dr Andrew Medhurst (formally Lead Scientist at GSK, Harlow, UK) for support, advice and radioligand. This study was funded by a BBSRC/GSK (UK) CASE award (NL) and Parkinson’s UK.
Footnotes
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2016.08.034.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.McKeith I.G., Galasko D., Kosaka K., Perry E.K., Dickson D.W., Hansen L.A., Salmon D.P., Lowe J., Mirra S.S., Byrne E.J., Lennox G., Quinn N.P., Edwardson J.A., Ince P.J., Bergerson C., Burns A., Miller B.L., Lovestone S., Collerton D., Jansen E.N.H., Ballard C., de Vos R.A.I., Wilcock F.K., Jellinger K.A., Perry E.K. Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathological diagnosis of dementia with Lewy-body (DLB): report on the consortium on DLB international workshop. Neurology. 1996;47:113–124. doi: 10.1212/wnl.47.5.1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Esbenshade T.A., Fox G.B., Cowart M.D. Histamine H3 receptor antagonists: preclinical promise for treating obesity and cognitive disorders. Mol. Interv. 2006;6:77–88. doi: 10.1124/mi.6.2.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bonaventure P., Letavic M., Dugovic C., Wilson S., Aluisio L., Pudiak C., Lord B., Mazur C., Kamme F., Nishino S., Carruthers N., Lovenberg T. Histamine H3 receptor antagonists: from target identification to drug leads. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2007;73:1084–1096. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Esbenshade T.A., Browman K.E., Bitner R.S., Strakhova M., Cowart M.D., Brioni J.D. The histamine H3 receptor: an attractive target for the treatment of cognitive disorders. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008;154:1166–1181. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Panula P., Chazot P.L., Cowart M., Gutzmer R., Leurs R., Liu W.L., Stark H., Thurmond R.L., Haas H.L. Pharmacol. Rev. 2015;67(3):601–655. doi: 10.1124/pr.114.010249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Medhurst A.D., Atkins A.R., Brackenborough K., Briggs M.A., Calver A.R., Cilia J., Cluderay J.E., Crook B., Davis J.B., Davis R.K., Davis R.P., Dawson L.A., Foley A.G., Gartlon J., Gonzalez M.I., Heslop T., Hirst W.D., Jennings C., Jones D.N., Lacroix L.P., Martyn A., Ociepka S., Ray A., Regan C.M., Roberts J.C., Schogger J., Southam E., Stean T.O., Trail B.K., Upton N., Wadsworth G., Wald J.A., White T., Witherington J., Woolley M.L., Worby A., Wilson D.M. GSK189254, a novel H3 receptor antagonist that binds to histamine H3 receptors in Alzheimer’s disease brain and improves cognitive performance in preclinical models. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2007;321(3):1032–1045. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.120311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Medhurst A.D., Briggs M.A., Bruton G., Calver A.R., Chessell I., Crook B. Structurally novel histamine H3 receptor antagonists GSK207040 and GSK334429 improve scopolamine-induced memory impairment and capsaicin-induced secondary allodynia in rats. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2007;73:1182–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cowart M., Faghih R., Curtis M.P., Gfesser G.A., Bennani Y.L., Black L.A., Pan L., Marsh K.C., Sullivan J.P., Esbenshade T.A., Fox G.B., Hancock A.A. 4-(2-[2-(2(R)-methylpyrrolidin-1-yl)ethyl]benzofuran-5-yl)benzonitrile and related 2-aminoethylbenzofuran H3 receptor antagonists potently enhance cognition and attention. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48(1):38–55. doi: 10.1021/jm040118g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cacabelos R., Yamatodani A., Niigawa H., Hariguchi S., Tada K., Nishimura T. Brain histamine in Alzheimer’s disease. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 1989;11:353–360. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mazurkiewicz-Kwilecki I.M., Nsonwah S. Changes in the regional brain histamine and histidine levels in postmortem brains of Alzheimer patients. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1989;67:75–78. doi: 10.1139/y89-013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Panula P., Rinne J., Kuokkanen K., Eriksson K.S., Sallmen T., Kalimo H., Relja M. Neuronal histamine deficit in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience. 1998;82:993–997. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00353-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Airaksinen M.S., Reinikainen K., Riekkinen P. Neurofibrillary tangles and histamine-containing neurons in Alzheimer hypothalamus. Agents Actions. 1991;33(1–2):104–107. doi: 10.1007/BF01993139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nakamura S., Takemura M., Ohnishi K., Suenaga T., Nishimura M., Akiguchi I., Kimura J., Kimura T. Loss of large neurons and occurrence of neurofibrillary tangles in the tuberomammilary nucleus of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 1993;151:581–587. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90019-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Braak H., Braak E. Neuropathological staging of Alzheimer’s related changes. Acta Neuropathol. (Berl.) 1991;82:239–259. doi: 10.1007/BF00308809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schneider C., Risser D., Kirchner L., Kitzmüller E., Cairns N., Prast H., Singewald N., Lubec G. Similar deficits of central histaminergic system in patients with Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease. Neurosci. Lett. 1997;222(3):183–186. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(97)13379-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Medhurst A.D., Roberts J.C., Lee J., Chen C.P., Brown S.H., Roman S., Lai M.K. Characterization of histamine H3 receptors in Alzheimer’s disease brain and amyloid overexpressing TASTPM mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009;157(1):130–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2008.00075.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Haig G.M., Bain E., Robieson W., Othman A.A., Baker J., Lenz R.A. A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of the H3 antagonist ABT-288 in cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 2014;40(6):1433–1442. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schwartz J.C. The histamine H3 receptor: from discovery to clinical trials with pitolisant. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011;163(4):713–721. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01286.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schwartz J.C., Lecomte J.M. Clinical trials with H3-receptor inverse agonists: what they tell us about the role of histamine in the human brain. Neuropharmacology. 2016;(April (7)) doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.04.006. pii: S0028-3908(16)30142-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chazot P.L. Therapeutic potential of histamine H3 receptor antagonists in dementias. Drug News Perspect. 2010;23(2):99–103. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2010.23.2.1475899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Brown R.E., Stevens D.R., Haas H.L. The physiology of brain histamine. Prog. Neurobiol. 2011;63(6):637–672. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(00)00039-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pollard H., Moreau J., Arrang S., Airaksinen M.S. A detailed autoradiographic mapping of histamine H3 receptors in rat brain areas. Neuroscience. 1993;52:169–189. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(93)90191-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Leurs R., Celanire C., Wijtmans M., Talaga P., de Esch I.J.P. Histamine H3 receptor antoaginst reach out for the clinical. Keynote Rev. 2005;10:1613–1627. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03625-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Prell G.D., Khandelwal J.K., Burns R.S., LeWitt P.A., Green J.P. Influence of age and gender on the levels of histamine metabolites and pros-methylimidazoleacetic acid in human cerebrospinal fluid. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 1991;12(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/0167-4943(91)90002-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Blandina P., Giorgetti M., Bartolini L., Cecchi M., Timmerman H., Leurs R., Pepeu G., Giovannini M.G. Inhibition of cortical acetylcholine release and cognitive performance by histamine H3 receptor activation in rats. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1996;119:1656–1664. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb16086.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cangioli I., Baldi E., Mannaioni P.F., Bucherelli C., Blandina P., Passani M.B. Activation of histaminergic H3 receptors in the rat basolateral amygdala improves expression of fear memory and enhances acetylcholine release. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002;16(3):521–528. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bacciottini L., Passani M.B., Giovannelli L., Cangioli I., Mannaioni P.F., Schunack W., Blandina P. Endogenous histamine in the medial septum-diagonal band complex increases the release of acetylcholine from the hippocampus: a dual-probe microdialysis study in the freely moving rat. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002;15(10):1669–1680. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ferrada C., Ferré S., Casadó V., Cortés A., Justinova Z., Barnes C., Canela E.I., Goldberg S.R., Leurs R., Lluis C., Franco R. Interactions between histamine H3 and dopamine D2 receptors and the implications for striatal function. Neuropharmacology. 2008;55(2):190–197. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Anichtchik O.V., Peitsaro N., Rinne J.O., Kalimo H., Panula P. Distribution and modulation of histamine H(3) receptors in basal ganglia and frontal cortex of healthy controls and patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2001;8:707–716. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.2001.0413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cross R.B. Demonstration of neurofibrillary tangles in paraffin sections: a quick and simple method using a modifications of Palmgren’s method. Med. Lab. Sci. 1982;39:299–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bancroft J.D., Stevens A. 3rd ed. Churchill; Livingstone Edinburgh: 1990. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. [Google Scholar]
- 32.McKeith I.G., Dickson D.W., Lowe J., Emre M., O’Brien J.T., Feldman H., Cummings J., Duda J.E., Lippa C., Perry E.K., Aarsland D., Arai H., Ballard C.G., Boeve B., Burn D.J., Costa D., Del Ser T., Dubois B., Galasko D., Gauthier S., Goetz C.G., Gomez-Tortosa E., Halliday G., Hansen L.A., Hardy J., Iwatsubo T., Kalaria R.N., Kaufer D., Kenny R.A., Korczyn A., Kosaka K., Lee V.M., Lees A., Litvan I., Londos E., Lopez O.L., Minoshima S., Mizuno Y., Molina J.A., Mukaetova-Ladinska E.B., Pasquier F., Perry R.H., Schulz J.B., Trojanowski J.Q., Yamada M., Consortium on DLB Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2005;65(12):1863–1872. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000187889.17253.b1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Perry R.H. A guide to the cortical regions. In: Roberts G.W., Leigh P.N., Weinberger D.R., editors. Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Wolfe; London: 1993. pp. 1.1–1.10. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mai J.K., Assheuer, Paxinos G. Academic Press; San Diego, Calif: 1997. Atlas of the Human Brain. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Folstein M.F., Folstein S., McHugh P. Mini mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 1975;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ramaker C., Marinus J., Stiggelbout A.M., van Hilten B.J. Systematic evaluation of rating scales for impairment and disability in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2002;7(5):867–876. doi: 10.1002/mds.10248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Goodchild R.E., Court J.A., Hobson I., Piggott M.A., Perry R.H., Ince P., Jaros E., Perry E.K. Distribution of histamine H3-receptor binding in the normal human basal ganglia: comparison with Huntington’s and Parkinson’s disease cases. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1999;11(2):449–456. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00453.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Martinez-Mir M.I., Pollard H., Moreau J., Arrang J.M., Ruat M., Traiffort E., Schwartz J.C., Palacios J.M. Three histamine receptors (H1, H2 and H3) visualized in the brain of human and non-human primates. Brain Resolut. 1990;526:322–327. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91240-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sheng Y., Lee J.H., Medhurst A.D., Wilcock G.K., Esiri M., Wong P.T., Chen C.P., Lai M.K. Preservation of cortical histamine H3 receptors in ischemic vascular and mixed dementias. J. Neurol. Sci. 2012;315(1–2):110–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shan L., Bossers K., Unmehopa U., Bao A.M., Swaab D.F. Alterations in the histaminergic system in Alzheimer’s disease: a postmortem study. Neurobiol. Ageing. 2012;33(11):2585–2598. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Anichtchik O.V., Houtari M., Peitsaro N., Haycock J.W., Mannisto P.T., Panula P. Modulation of histamine H3 receptors in the brain of 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2000;12(11):3823–3832. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00267.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Higuchi M., Yanai K., Okamura N., Meguro K., Arai H., Itoh M., Iwata R., Ido T., Watanabe T., Sasaki H. Histamine H1 receptors in patients with Alzheimer’s disease assessed by positron emission tomography. Neuroscience. 2000;99(4):721–729. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00230-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Whitehouse P.J., Price D.L., Struble R.G., Clark A.W., Coyle J.T., Delon M.R. Alzheimer’s disease and senile dementia: loss of neurons in the basal forebrain. Science. 1982;215(4537):1237–1239. doi: 10.1126/science.7058341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shan L., Qi X.R., Balesar R., Swaab D.F., Bao A.M. The human histaminergic system in neuropsychiatric disorders. Trends Neurosci. 2015;38(3):167–177. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shan L., Bao A.M., Swaab D.F. Unaltered histaminergic system in depression: a postmortem study. J. Affect. Disord. 2013;146(2):220–223. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Spinks R., Nopoulos R.P., Ward J., Fuller R., Magnotta V.A., Andreasen N.C. Globus pallidus volume is related to symptom severity in neuroleptic naive patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2005;73(2–3):229–233. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Caseras X., Tansey K.E., Foley S., Linden D. Association between genetic risk scoring for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with regional subcortical volumes. Transl. Psychiatry. 2015;5:e692. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jin C.Y., Anichtchik O., Panula P. Altered histamine H3 receptor radioligand binding in post-mortem brain samples from subjects with psychiatric diseases. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009;157(1):118–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00149.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fox G.B., Pan J.B., Esbenshade T.A., Bennani Y.L., Black L.A., Faghih R., Hancock A.A., Decker M.W. Effects of histamine H3 receptor ligands GT-2331 and ciproxifan in a repeated acquisition avoidance response in the spontaneously hypertensive rat pup. Behav. Brain Res. 2002;131:151–161. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00379-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Fox G.B., Esbenshade T.A., Pan J.B., Radek R.J., Krueger K.M., Yao B.B., Browman K.E., Buckley M.J., Ballard M.E., Komater V.A., Miner H., Zhang M., Faghih R., Rueter L.E., Bitner R.S., Drescher K.U., Wetter J., Marsh K., Lemaire M., Porsolt R.D., Bennani Y.L., Sullivan J.P., Cowart M.D., Decker M.W., Hancock A.A. Pharmacological properties of ABT-239[4-(2-{2-[(2R)-2-methylpyrrolidinyl]ethyl}-benzofuran5yl) benzonitrile]: II. Neurophysiological characterization and broad preclinical efficacy in cognition and schizophrenia of a potent and selective histamine H3 receptor antagonist. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005;313:176–190. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.078402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Browman K.E., Komater V.A., Curzon P., Rueter L.E., Hancock A.A., Decker M.W., Fox G.B. Enhancement of prepulse inhibition of startle in mice by the H3 receptor antagonists thioperamide and ciproxifan. Behav. Brain Res. 2004;153:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.