Abstract
The pike-perch iridovirus (PPIV) was isolated in Finland from apparently healthy pike-perch fingerlings during routine disease surveillance. Our phylogenomic analysis revealed that PPIV is the first fish member of a clade of ranaviruses previously described from European and Chinese amphibians.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Pike-perch iridovirus (PPIV) was isolated in Finland in 1995 from apparently healthy pike-perch fingerlings during routine disease surveillance (1). Internal organ homogenates of fish collected just before restocking resulted in cytopathic effects (CPE) on several fish cell lines, including bluegill fry (BF-2) and epithelioma papulosum cyprini (EPC) cells. Electron microscopy performed on infected BF-2 cell cultures revealed iridovirus-like particles. Infected cell cultures produced positive results for a direct immunofluorescent assay using rabbit polyclonal serum against several fish ranaviruses. Sequence analysis of the partial PPIV genome further supported its membership within the genus Ranavirus (2).
The PPIV isolate was amplified in EPC cells maintained in minimal essential medium (MEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 23°C. Inoculation of EPC cells at a high multiplicity of infection (MOI) provided sixth-passage material harvested after 48 h when CPE was extensive. Cell culture supernatant was clarified at 3,000 × g for 20 min, and total nucleic acids were purified using a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen). A DNA library was prepared using the Nextera XT DNA kit (Illumina), and sequencing was performed using a version 3 chemistry 600-cycle kit on a MiSeq platform (Illumina). De novo assembly of 4,981,658 paired-end reads in SPAdes (3) produced a contiguous consensus sequence of 108,041 bp, with a G+C content of 56.67%. The quality of the genome assembly was assessed by mapping the reads back to the consensus sequence in Bowtie 2 (4) and visually inspecting the alignment in Tablet (5). A total of 4,936,887 reads (99.1%) aligned at an average coverage of 12,082 reads/nucleotide.
A total of 109 putative open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using GeneMarkS (6) and GATU (7) with common midwife toad virus (CMTV) isolates from the Netherlands (CMTV-NL; GenBank accession no. KP056312) and Spain (CMTV-E; GenBank accession no. JQ231222) used as reference genomes. Gene function was predicted based on BLASTP searches against the NCBI GenBank nonredundant protein sequence database. Comparative genomic analyses revealed that the aforementioned CMTVs and PPIV are very similar, except PPIV ORFs 7, 40, 50, 76, 81, 82, and 104 (hypothetical genes) were not included in one or both of the original CMTV genome annotations (8, 9). A frameshift mutation leading to an early stop codon was predicted in the CMTV-NL genome as compared to the complete ORF 76 (hypothetical protein) in PPIV and CMTV-E. Additional frameshift mutations leading to early stop codons were predicted in PPIV corresponding to ORFs 11 and 50 (hypothetical proteins) in CMTV-NL and CMTV-E.
Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis based on concatenated amino acid sequences of the 26 Iridoviridae core genes (10) revealed that PPIV belongs to a clade of ranaviruses isolated from European (CMTV) and Chinese Andrias davidianus ranavirus (ADRV; GenBank accession numbers KC865735 and KF033124) amphibians. An analysis of locally collinear blocks in Mauve (11) revealed that the PPIV, CMTV, and ADRV genomes are collinear.
Wild amphibians were observed in the same ponds that yielded PPIV from asymptomatic pike-perch, leaving open the possibility of interclass transmission (1, 12). Experimental PPIV infection trials did not generate disease in either pike-perch or rainbow trout; however, the virus was recovered from survivors in both studies, suggesting these hosts might serve as carriers (13). Other studies have demonstrated that PPIV can cause lethal infections in northern pike fry (14) and European common frog tadpoles (15), suggesting that the virus is capable of crossing host species barriers.
Accession number(s).
The complete genome sequence of PPIV has been deposited in GenBank under the accession no. KX574341.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Patrick Thompson for his technical assistance.
Funding Statement
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Footnotes
Citation Holopainen R, Subramaniam K, Steckler NK, Claytor SC, Ariel E, Waltzek TB. 2016. Genome sequence of a ranavirus isolated from pike-perch Sander lucioperca. Genome Announc 4(6):e01295-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01295-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Tapiovaara H, Olesen NJ, Lindén J, Rimaila-Pärnänen E, von Bonsdorff CH. 1998. Isolation of an iridovirus from pike-perch Stizostedion lucioperca. Dis Aquat Org 32:185–193. doi: 10.3354/dao032185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Holopainen R, Ohlemeyer S, Schütze H, Bergmann SM, Tapiovaara H. 2009. Ranavirus phylogeny and differentiation based on major capsid protein, DNA polymerase and neurofilament triplet H1-like protein genes. Dis Aquat Org 85:81–91. doi: 10.3354/dao02074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Milne I, Bayer M, Cardle L, Shaw P, Stephen G, Wright F, Marshall D. 2010. Tablet—next generation sequence assembly visualization. Bioinformatics 26:401–402. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2607–2618. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tcherepanov V, Ehlers A, Upton C. 2006. Genome annotation transfer utility (GATU): rapid annotation of viral genomes using a closely related reference genome. BMC Genomics 7:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Van Beurden SJ, Hughes J, Saucedo B, Rijks J, Kik M, Haenen OL, Engelsma MY, Gröne A, Verheije MH, Wilkie G. 2014. Complete genome sequence of a common midwife toad virus-like ranavirus associated with mass mortalities in wild amphibians in the Netherlands. Genome Announc 2(6):e01293-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01293-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mavian C, López-Bueno A, Balseiro A, Casais R, Alcamí A, Alejo A. 2012. The genome sequence of the emerging common midwife toad virus identifies an evolutionary intermediate within ranaviruses. J Virol 86:3617–3625. doi: 10.1128/JVI.07108-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eaton HE, Metcalf J, Penny E, Tcherepanov V, Upton C, Brunetti CR. 2007. Comparative genomic analysis of the family Iridoviridae: re-annotating and defining the core set of iridovirus genes. Virol J 4:11. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-4-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. 2004. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 14:1394–1403. doi: 10.1101/gr.2289704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Duffus ALJ, Waltzek TB, Stöhr AC, Allender MC, Gotesman M, Whittington RJ, Hick P, Hines MK, Marschang RE. 2015. Distribution and host range of ranaviruses, p 9–57. In Gray MJ, Chinchar VG (ed), Ranaviruses: lethal pathogens of ectothermic vertebrates. Springer, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jensen BB, Holopainen R, Tapiovaara H, Ariel E. 2011. Susceptibility of pike-perch Sander lucioperca to a panel of ranavirus isolates. Aquaculture 313:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.01.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jensen BB, Ersbøll AK, Ariel E. 2009. Susceptibility of pike Esox lucius to a panel of ranavirus isolates. Dis Aquat Org 83:169–179. doi: 10.3354/dao02021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bayley AE, Hill BJ, Feist SW. 2013. Susceptibility of the European common frog Rana temporaria to a panel of ranavirus isolates from fish and amphibian hosts. Dis Aquat Org 103:171–183. doi: 10.3354/dao02574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]