Abstract
Novel drug delivery systems for controlled-release of opioid agonists as a long time painkillers or opioid antagonists for opium, heroin, and alcohol addiction are under development or in clinical use today. In this article, the field of “new drug delivery systems” is momentarily reviewed from the viewpoint of the marketed opioid agonists/antagonists dosage forms today.
Keywords: Opium, Controlled release, New drug delivery systems
Introduction
During the past four decades, controlled release systems have impacted virtually every branch of medicine including ophthalmology, pulmonary, pain medicine, endocrinology, cardiology, orthopedics, immunology, neurology, and dentistry.1 Polymeric nano/microspheres, liposomes, transdermal (TD) patches, and oral controlled-release dosage forms are currently in clinical practice.
Polymeric nano/microparticles can entrap therapeutic agents and release them in a regulated manner through bulk or surface erosion of the particles, diffusion of the drug through the polymer matrix, or swelling followed by diffusion. Alternatively, drug release can be triggered by the environment or other external events such as changes in pH, temperature, or the presence of an analyte such as glucose.1
Lipid vesicular systems such as liposomes and niosomes could be used for encapsulation of both hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds.2 The first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved liposomal formulations, doxorubicin nano- liposomes (DoxilTM) is administered in patients suffering from ovarian or breast cancer and in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients with Kaposi sarcoma.3 AmbisomeTM, another FDA-approved formulation for amphotericin B is used in life treating fungal infections and visceral leishmaniasis and recently was studied for mucormycosis therapy.4
TD drug delivery patches were extensively used for transport of different drugs through the most important barrier in the skin, stratum corneum, and delivering the drug in bloodstream for achieving a systemic effect. TD fentanyl is an example of topically used dosage form for pain management in both malignant and non- malignant pains.5 In a more recently approved TD patch, the anti-Parkinson’s disease drug, rotigotine, is applied in developed neurodegenerative patients.6
Different technologies were also utilized for slow, extended, controlled, or sustained release of various therapeutic agents using new oral drug delivery systems such as polymeric matrix or gel- forming tablets7 and oral osmotic pumps.8 Many of these technologies have been used for extended-release opioid drugs with lower potential of abuse and addiction.
In the present rapid review, the marketed controlled-release dosage forms for opioid agonists/antagonists will be briefly introduced and the rational of design and application this type of formulations will be explained.
New Drug Delivery Systems for Opioid-Related Therapeutics
Naltrexone
This compound is an opioid antagonist with maximum affinity for the µ-opioid receptors and has few, if any inherent effects as well its opioid blocking properties. The US FDA approved naltrexone for the treatment of alcohol dependence in 1994. In spite of this permission, the studies of the efficacy of naltrexone for alcohol dependence have yielded variable findings.9 One reason for the lack of success in alcohol dependence treatment with oral naltrexone is patient’s non-compliances.9 Some studies10,11 have also shown that only subjects who are highly compliant with naltrexone have greater reductions in alcohol consumption and risk of relapse than subjects treated with placebo. One- way for overcoming this problem is the utilizing of sustained release or depot formulations. Depot injectable dosage form of naltrexone, VivitrolTM (Figure 1), was approved by FDA on April 13, 2006, for the alcohol dependence treatment in patients who are capable to withdraw from drinking in an outpatient setting and who are not actively drinking at the therapy beginning. Vivitrol recommended dose is 380 mg administered intramuscularly once a month or every 28 days. Other depot parenteral formulations of naltrexone are DepotrexTM and NaltrelTM. Vivitrol has demonstrated efficacy at decreasing heavy drinking among alcohol- dependent males and Naltrel helped to promote abstinence and decrease the incidence of relapse in two samples of alcohol-dependent subjects.12
Figure 1.
VivitrolTM (naltrexone depot injectable formulation)
Naltrexone affords a blockade against the intoxicating and reinforcing effects of opioid like compounds, which theoretically can result in the extinction of drug-taking behavior. It offers no euphoric effects, and thus, is not abused; nor does it engender physiological dependence.13 As with the alcohol, the major problem with the oral formulation of naltrexone for heroin or opium dependence is poor compliance (adherence). Long-acting sustained release formulations of naltrexone (injectable or implantable) may assist to develop compliance, and thus, augment the efficacy of abstinence-oriented cure of heroin or opium dependence with naltrexone.14,15 Vivitrol is administered for the preclusion of relapse to opium dependence, following opioid detoxification.
Fentanyl
Opioids are the mainstay of the treatment for chronic moderate to severe pain. The availability of TD opioid formulations has provided new treatment choices for long-term pain management in patients suffering from chronic pain.16
Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid approximately 100 times more powerful than morphine used as a general anesthetic and analgetic (painkiller). It is a potent Schedule II narcotic analgesic recommended for use in the management of unremitting pain not controlled by morphine or other opiate/opioid drugs.17 DuragesicTM (Figure 2) is the most famous pain relief fentanyl TD patches. TD form of fentanyl in children with cancer pain may demonstrate less side effects in comparison to other opioids, especially constipation.18
Figure 2.
DuragesicTM (fentanyl transdermal system)
Fatal fentanyl intoxication following excessive TD17,19 or intravenous (IV) misuse of TD formulations20 have been reported. Due to these reports, on July 15, 2005, the FDA issued a Public Health Advisory warning physicians and users of fentanyl patches that “deaths and overdoses have occurred in patients using both the brand name product Duragesic and the generic product.”21
Slatkin et al.22 reported the high efficacy, well tolerance, and rapid onset of analgesia in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic cancer pain after using fentanyl buccal tablet, a new opioid formulation. Borland et al.23 also showed that the effective analgesia in children aged 7-15 years presenting to an emergency division with an acute fracture comparing with IV morphine at 0.1 mg/kg. Allan et al.24 compared the safety and efficacy of TD fentanyl and sustained release morphine in strong-opioid naïve patients with chronic low back pain. The results showed equivalent levels of pain relief, but TD fentanyl was associated with less constipation. They concluded that sustained-release strong opioids could safely be used in strong-opioid native patients.
Ackerman et al.25 assessed patient-reported utilization patterns of fentanyl TD patch and concluded some patients used the patches in an incorrectly way.
Morphine
Intrathecal drug delivery, using an implantable drug delivery system, can improve pain relief, reduce suffering, and enhance quality of life in patients who do not answer well to conventional therapies such as oral analgesics.26 One of these drug delivery systems called liposomes has been extensively studies for preparation of sustained- release of therapeutics. Liposomes are the hydrated mixture of cholesterol and natural or synthetic phospholipids which form nano/microparticles through the assembly of amphiphilic bilayer membrane lipids.27 A specific form of multivesicular liposomes called DepoFoamTM has been used for encapsulation and extended-release of morphine through epidural route.28 Extended-release epidural morphine (EREM) is available in the market as DepoDurTM for severe chronic pain such as spinal cord tumors (Figure 3). Both the extended-release and enhanced retention of morphine in the epidural space could be achieved due to the large size of the DepoFoam particles (7-40 µm).29
Figure 3.
DepoDurTM EREM (extendedrelease epidural morphine)
Gambling et al.30 showed that the adverse events with those of epidural opioids (i.e., nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and hypotension) were acceptable and predictable for the single-dose EREM (DepoDur) after lower abdominal surgery. DepoDur provided better and extended post- Cesarean analgesia in comparison with a common epidural morphine with no considerable raise in adverse effects.31
Opioid extended-release formulations hold a superior desirability for abusers than immediate- release formulations due to their per dose level of the drug.32 Therefore, the use of opioid formulations intended to deter or prevent product abuse and tampering significantly improves pain management while minimizing opioid abuse.33,34 A new oral dosage form that combines naltrexone hydrochloride and morphine sulfate in a single capsule (EmbedaTM) was recently (September 2009) approved by US FDA for the long-term management of moderate to severe pain.35 The first Embeda consists of extended-release morphine with sequestered naltrexone that is released if the tablet is compromised by chewing or crushing.36 Morphine pellets have been used in the outer layer of Embeda formulation (Figure 4) while naltrexone has been incorporated in internal core of this formulation. The reason for this formulation use is to prevent abusers from crushing the solid dosage form for intranasal administration or from injecting themselves. If it is crushed, the morphine would blend with the naltrexone, which this compound would competitively antagonize the morphine effects in the body. The inner core containing naltrexone is formulated so that if consumed orally, the core encapsulating the naltrexone would not be digested by the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The pellets in the capsule are sprinkled over approximately one tablespoon of apple sauce and the whole sauce and pellets will be swallowed (Figure 5). Embeda has been profitably used in the treatment of chronic pain of osteoarthritis of the knee or hip, while the sequestered naltrexone did not interfere with efficacy.37
Figure 4.
Morphine sulfate/naltrexone pellets in EmbedaTM formulation
Figure 5.
EmbedaTM [morphine sulfate/naltrexone hydrochloride (HCl)] capsule administration steps
However, severe adverse events were reported in a 39-year-old woman with a history of chronic pain who chewed her first Embeda dose before swallowing.35 Approximately 10-20 minutes later, the patient experienced nausea and generalized body aches, followed by four episodes of emesis.
MS ContinTM, another morphine sustained release tablet, is administered for the management of pain severe enough to require daily, around- the-clock, long-term opioid treatment and for which alternative treatment options are inadequate (Figure 6).38
Figure 6.
MS ContinTM (controlledrelease morphine sulfate tablets)
Oxycodone
Oxycodone, a narcotic pain reliever used to treat moderate to severe pain, is available as twice-a-day controlled-release tablets (OxyContinTM) for the management of moderate to severe, chronic low back pain.39 This formulation was thought to have much lower abuse potential than immediate-release oxycodone because of its slow-release properties addiction.40 However, beginning in 2000, widespread reports of OxyContin abuse surfaced.
AcuroxTM contains an aversive agent (niacin) that causes unpleasant effects when injected, inhaled, or taken orally in high doses.34 RemoxyTM is an oral, long-acting oxycodone gelatin capsule under development with pain therapeutics, to which have been licensed exclusive, worldwide, development and commercialization rights under a development and license agreement entered into in December 2002. Remoxy is formulated with ORADUR® technology.41
Oxymorphone
This therapeutic agent is a Schedule II controlled semi-synthetic opioid analgesic which was approved by the FDA in 2006 for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain. At present, it is available as an extended-release formulation, Opana ERTM (Endo Pharmaceuticals). This formulation contains xanthan and locust bean gum which after swallowing become a tight, thick gel, and slowly releases the drug. In a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in opioid-experienced patients with chronic, moderate to severe low back pain, Opana ER showed efficacious, long-term analgesic effect and was generally well-tolerated.42
Naloxone (NLX)
NLX is a non-specific, competitive opioid antagonist and is used to reverse opioid-induced central nervous system and respiratory depression. NLX shows a short biological half-life (64 minutes), following its IV administration.43
Hydromorphone
Hydromorphone is a potent semi-synthetic opioid which is commonly used in the hospital setting, mostly IV because its bioavailability orally, rectally, and intranasally is very low. Osmotic providing some abuse deterrence. To augment the level of abuse prevention, NLX was combined with buprenorphine in a 1:4 ratio (Suboxone™) to deter diversion and IV misuse and may be suitable for unsupervised administration.33 Suboxone is available as both a sublingual tablet and a sublingual film. TM extended-release oral delivery system (OROSTM) of hydromorphone (Exalgo, Mallinckrodt) was approved by FDA, in 2010, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe pain in patients who are opioid-tolerant and who need around-the-clock analgesia.33 Following OROS oral administration, an osmotic material absorbs water from GI tract and the drug pushes out through a laser formed or punched orifice on tablet surface in a controlled manner (Figure 7).44 OROS technology allows hydromorphone to be released at a constant rate over a period of 24 hours. OROS hydromorphone was successfully used once-daily in patients with chronic low back pain45 and chronic, moderate to severe osteoarthritis pain.46
Figure 7.
Osmotic extended-release OROSTM (oral delivery system)
Buprenorphine
Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist at the µ- opioid receptors and partial antagonist at the к- opioid receptors. This double action makes buprenorphine helpful as an analgesic while also providing some abuse deterrence. To augment the level of abuse prevention, NLX was combined with buprenorphine in a 1:4 ratio (Suboxone™) to deter diversion and IV misuse and may be suitable for unsupervised administration.33 Suboxone is available as both a sublingual tablet and a sublingual film.
A new TD formulation of buprenorphine has been entered in market for long duration of pain control (Figure 8).47
Figure 8.
Transdermal buprenorphine (ButransTM)
Conclusion
Opium-derived substances have strong pain- killing or analgesic effects with high potential of abuse, dependency and other side effects such as constipation and pulmonary distress. For better delivery and effectiveness of these compounds, reducing side effects, demising the abuse potential and achieving a sustained-release effect, vast researches have been done to formulate novel drug delivery systems. However, among these investigated formulations, some FDA approved dosage forms are present in the market, and this brief review explained the superiority of them in comparison to traditional dosage forms.
Acknowledgments
None.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors have no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Farokhzad OC, Langer R. Nanomedicine: developing smarter therapeutic and diagnostic modalities. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58(14):1456–9. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Varshosaz J, Pardakhty A, Hajhashemi VI, Najafabadi AR. Development and physical characterization of sorbitan monoester niosomes for insulin oral delivery. Drug Deliv. 2003;10(4):251–62. doi: 10.1080/drd_10_4_251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang AZ, Langer R, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticle delivery of cancer drugs. Annu Rev Med. 2012;63:185–98. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-040210-162544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Spellberg B, Ibrahim AS, Chin-Hong PV, Kontoyiannis DP, Morris MI, Perfect JR, et al. The Deferasirox-AmBisome Therapy for Mucormycosis (DEFEAT Mucor) study: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(3):715–22. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Heiskanen T, Matzke S, Haakana S, Gergov M, Vuori E, Kalso E. Transdermal fentanyl in cachectic cancer patients. Pain. 2009;144(1-2):218–22. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rektor I, Babic T, Boothmann B, Polivka J, Boroojerdi B, Randerath O. High doses of rotigotine transdermal patch: results of an open-label, dose- escalation trial in patients with advanced-stage, idiopathic Parkinson disease. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2009;32(4):193–8. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e31819a689f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Youan BB. Chronopharmaceutical drug delivery systems: Hurdles, hype or hope? Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010;62(9-10):898–903. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2010.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Malaterre V, Ogorka J, Loggia N, Gurny R. Approach to design push-pull osmotic pumps. Int J Pharm. 2009;376(1-2):56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kranzler HR, Wesson DR, Billot L. Naltrexone depot for treatment of alcohol dependence: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;28(7):1051–9. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000130804.08397.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chick J, Anton R, Checinski K, Croop R, Drummond DC, Farmer R, et al. A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence or abuse. Alcohol Alcohol. 2000;35(6):587–93. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/35.6.587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Monti PM, Rohsenow DJ, Swift RM, Gulliver SB, Colby SM, Mueller TI, et al. Naltrexone and cue exposure with coping and communication skills training for alcoholics: treatment process and 1-year outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001;25(11):1634–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Johnson BA. Naltrexone long-acting formulation in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007;3(5):741–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sullivan MA, Vosburg SK, Comer SD. Depot naltrexone: antagonism of the reinforcing, subjective, and physiological effects of heroin. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;189(1):37–46. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0509-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Comer SD, Sullivan MA, Hulse GK. Sustained- release naltrexone: novel treatment for opioid dependence. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2007;16(8):1285–94. doi: 10.1517/13543784.16.8.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Krupitsky EM, Blokhina EA. Long-acting depot formulations of naltrexone for heroin dependence: a review. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2010;23(3):210–4. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283386578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sittl R, Likar R, Nautrup BP. Equipotent doses of transdermal fentanyl and transdermal buprenorphine in patients with cancer and noncancer pain: results of a retrospective cohort study. Clin Ther. 2005;27(2):225–37. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jumbelic MI. Deaths with transdermal fentanyl patches. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2010;31(1):18–21. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e31818738b8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zernikow B, Michel E, Anderson B. Transdermal fentanyl in childhood and adolescence: a comprehensive literature review. J Pain. 2007;8(3):187–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Edinboro LE, Poklis A, Trautman D, Lowry S, Backer R, Harvey CM. Fatal fentanyl intoxication following excessive transdermal application. J Forensic Sci. 1997;42(4):741–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lilleng PK, Mehlum LI, Bachs L, Morild I. Deaths after intravenous misuse of transdermal fentanyl. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49(6):1364–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jumbelic MI. Deaths with transdermal fentanyl patches. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2010;31(1):18–21. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e31818738b8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Slatkin NE, Xie F, Messina J, Segal TJ. Fentanyl buccal tablet for relief of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer-related chronic pain. J Support Oncol. 2007;5(7):327–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Borland M, Jacobs I, King B, O'Brien D. A randomized controlled trial comparing intranasal fentanyl to intravenous morphine for managing acute pain in children in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(3):335–40. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Allan L, Richarz U, Simpson K, Slappendel R. Transdermal fentanyl versus sustained release oral morphine in strong-opioid naive patients with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30(22):2484–90. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000186860.23078.a8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ackerman SJ, Mordin M, Reblando J, Xu X, Schein J, Vallow S, et al. Patient-reported utilizationpatterns of fentanyl transdermal system and oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release among patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. J Manag Care Pharm. 2003;9(3):223–31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2003.9.3.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hassenbusch SJ, Garber J, Buchser E, Du Pen S, Nitescu P. Alternative intrathecal agents for the treatment of pain. Neuromodulation. 1999;2(2):85–91. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.1999.00085.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pardakhty A, Varshosaz J, Rouholamini A. In vitro study of polyoxyethylene alkyl ether niosomes for delivery of insulin. Int J Pharm. 2007;328(2):130–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nagle PC, Gerancher JC. DepoDur® (extended- release epidural morphine): A review of an old drug in a new vehicle. Techniques in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management. 2007;11(1):9–18. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Howell SB. Clinical applications of a novel sustained-release injectable drug delivery system: DepoFoam technology. Cancer J. 2001;7(3):219–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gambling D, Hughes T, Martin G, Horton W, Manvelian G. A comparison of Depodur, a novel, single-dose extended-release epidural morphine, with standard epidural morphine for pain relief after lower abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(4):1065–74. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000145009.03574.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Carvalho B, Roland LM, Chu LF, Campitelli VA, Riley ET. Single-dose, extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur) compared to conventional epidural morphine for post-cesarean pain. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(1):176–83. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000265533.13477.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Webster L. Update on abuse-resistant and abuse- deterrent approaches to opioid formulations. Pain Med. 2009;10(Suppl 2):S124–S133. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00672.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Moorman-Li R, Motycka CA, Inge LD, Congdon JM, Hobson S, Pokropski B. A review of abuse-deterrent opioids for chronic nonmalignant pain. P T. 2012;37(7):412–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Webster LR, Fine PG. Approaches to improve pain relief while minimizing opioid abuse liability. J Pain. 2010;11(7):602–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jang DH, Rohe JC, Hoffman RS, Nelson LS. Severe opioid withdrawal due to misuse of new combined morphine and naltrexone product (Embeda). Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55(3):303–4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bannwarth B. Will abuse-deterrent formulations of opioid analgesics be successful in achieving their purpose? Drugs. 2012;72(13):1713–23. doi: 10.2165/11635860-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Katz N, Sun S, Johnson F, Stauffer J. ALO-01 (morphine sulfate and naltrexone hydrochloride) extended-release capsules in the treatment of chronic pain of osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety. J Pain. 2010;11(4):303–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang WZ, Yu WJ, Zhao XL, He BX. Pharmacoeconomics evaluation of morphine,MS contin and oxycodone in the treatment of cancer pain. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(20):8797–800. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.20.8797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rauck RL, Bookbinder SA, Bunker TR, Alftine CD, Ghalie R, Negro-Vilar A, et al. The ACTION study: a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial comparing once-a-day extended-release morphine sulfate capsules (AVINZA) to twice-a-day controlled-release oxycodone hydrochloride tablets (OxyContin) for the treatment of chronic, moderate to severe low back pain. J Opioid Manag. 2006;2(3):155–66. doi: 10.5055/jom.2006.0025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cicero TJ, Inciardi JA, Munoz A. Trends in abuse of Oxycontin and other opioid analgesics in the United States: 2002-2004. J Pain. 2005;6(10):662–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mastropietro DJ, Omidian H. Current approaches in tamper-resistant and abuse-deterrent formulations. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2013;39(5):611–24. doi: 10.3109/03639045.2012.680468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hale ME, Ahdieh H, Ma T, Rauck R, Oxymorphone ER. Efficacy and safety of OPANA ER (oxymorphone extended release) for relief of moderate to severe chronic low back pain in opioid-experienced patients: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Pain. 2007;8(2):175–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Panchagnula R, Bokalial R, Sharma P, Khandavilli S. Transdermal delivery of naloxone: skin permeation, pharmacokinetic, irritancy and stability studies. Int J Pharm. 2005;293(1-2):213–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Palangio M, Northfelt DW, Portenoy RK, Brookoff D, Doyle RT, Dornseif BE, et al. Dose conversion and titration with a novel, once-daily, OROS osmotic technology, extended-release hydromorphone formulation in the treatment of chronic malignant or nonmalignant pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;23(5):355–68. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00390-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wallace M, Skowronski R, Khanna S, Tudor IC, Thipphawong J. Efficacy and safety evaluation of once-daily OROS hydromorphone in patients with chronic low back pain: a pilot open-label study (DO-127). Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(5):981–9. doi: 10.1185/030079907x182040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hale M, Tudor IC, Khanna S, Thipphawong J. Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily OROS hydromorphone and twice-daily extended-release oxycodone in patients with chronic, moderate to severe osteoarthritis pain: results of a 6-week, randomized, open-label, noninferiority analysis. Clin Ther. 2007;29(5):874–88. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Serpell M, Tripathi S, Scherzinger S, Rojas-Farreras S, Oksche A, Wilson M. Assessment of transdermal buprenorphine patches for the treatment of chronic pain in a UK observational study. Patient. 2016;9(1):35–46. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0151-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]