Skip to main content
Addiction & Health logoLink to Addiction & Health
. 2016 Apr;8(2):123–135.

Factors Affecting Hookah Smoking Trend in the Society: A Review Article

Victoria Momenabadi 1, Mohammad Hossein Kaveh PhD 2,, Seyed Yaser Hashemi 3, Vahid Reza Borhaninejad 4
PMCID: PMC5115646  PMID: 27882210

Abstract

Background

An increase in hookah smoking is considered to be a serious health problem in societies withdifferent cigarette smoking patterns. Thus, determinants of increase in this behavior are needed to beidentified. This study aimed to review the articles related to the causes of hookah smoking in the society.

Methods

This study reviewed the scientific references of authentic databases and journals, including Web ofScience, PubMed, Iranian Databases, Elsevier, Embase, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, CDC, and WorldHealth Organization (WHO). Overall, 84 scientific studies conducted during 1990-2015 were collected.

Findings

Several studies on the prevalence of smoking hookah and its associated factors in the societysuggested that numerous factors played a role in interest in smoking hookah. The most common reasons forindividuals’ inclination to smoke hookah were positive viewpoints toward smoking hookah, wrong beliefsabout its low risks, presumed lack of addiction, social acceptance, ease of access, wrong cultural habits, andregulative weakness.

Conclusion

Evidence indicated that a large spectrum of individual and social factors was effective in variouslevels of hookah consumption. Besides, it seems that single-component interventions and those solely basedon individual factors could not result in effective prevention. On the other hand, interventions based onecological approaches are suggested in this regard. Overall, it is essential to focus on the exclusion of positiveviewpoints toward hookah, develop the ability to say “no,” relaxation, and resistance against temptations tosmoke hookah, culturalization, and regulation of strong laws.

Keywords: Hookah, Consumption of tobacco products, Risk factors

Introduction

Today, consumption of tobacco products is considered as a globally prevalent health-related problem. It has been estimated that smoking will be the cause of one out of three death cases among adults by 2020.1 Consumption of tobacco products is one of the significant contributing factors to disease, disability, and early death in the world. The risk of death in tobacco consumers is 80% higher compared to those who do not consume tobacco.2

Tobacco is consumed in different ways such as cigarette, hookah, and chewing3 Hookah is an old method of consuming tobacco that dates back to 400 years ago and ancient India. It is called with different terms such as Narghile, Shisha, and Arghile in different parts of the world.4 Hookah is known as a common old method for consuming tobacco.5

Smoking hookah has numerous side effects because hookah smoke includes 4000 chemical materials, most of which are produced during burning process and are combined with more than 40 carcinogenic materials.6 Previous studies suggested that hookah smoke consists of large amounts of carcinogenic materials such as hydrocarbons and heavy metals.7 Besides, hookah produces significantly higher amounts of smoke compared to cigarette. A cigarette usually produces 500-600 ml smoke, while hookah produces 5000 ml smoke. Moreover, hookah smoke includes larger amounts of poisonous materials compared to cigarette. The amount of nicotine within the blood of a daily hookah smoker is equivalent to that of a cigarette smoker who smokes 10 cigarettes per day. Although more epidemiological studies are needed, it is evident that smoking hookah is associated with significant problems such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and addiction to nicotine.8 Nevertheless, the studies have shown that smoking water pipe tobacco (hookah) has turned into a social phenomenon that has become widely popular.9

In the recent years, smoking hookah has become popular among Asian and African adults, especially in the Middle East and Arab countries.10 Over 100 million individuals smoke hookah every day. The prevalence of this phenomenon in some parts of the world is even more than smoking cigarette.11 In a study, the prevalence of smoking hookah was 40.3% among students of state universities of Iran.12 Another study also revealed that the prevalence of smoking hookah was 29.7% among students of higher education institutes located in Khorramabad, Iran.13 In another study performed by Almerie et al. in Syria, the prevalence of smoking hookah was 23.5% in students of medical sciences.14 Similarly, Fielder et al. conducted a cohort study in 2009-2010 and demonstrated that the prevalence of hookah smoking among students increased from 29.0% before entering the university to 45.0% after the 1st year.15 In Lebanon also, the prevalence of smoking hookah increased from 21.0% in 2004 to 28.2% in the recent years.9 In the same line, Poyrazoglu et al. carried out research in Turkey and reported the prevalence of hookah smoking to be 28.6% among medical students and 37.5% among non-medical ones.16 Anjum et al., too, showed that the prevalence of hookah smoking was 27.0% among students and 54.0% among university students.17

The global rate of smoking hookah is increasing due to different factors such as misconceptions about its lack of health risks. This might also be due to its social acceptance, availability of different tastes, and its relatively low cost. The previous studies suggested that different viewpoints regarding lower negative effects of hookah compared to cigarette, easy access, and low cost influenced the prevalence of hookah smoking. In general, different theories and educational models are used for verification of conceptions of, beliefs about, and determining factors of smoking hookah and identification of the factors affecting quitting or continuation of this habit. This study aims to review the reasons for smoking hookah and the related educational interventions through review of the literature.

Methods

The present paper aimed to review scientific references derived from authentic databases and journals such as Web of Science, PubMed, Iranian Databases, Elsevier, Embase, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, CDC, and World Health Organization (WHO). Overall, 84 scientific papers conducted during 1990-2015 were collected. The inclusion criterion of the study was an emphasis on the determining factors of smoking hookah such as viewpoint, motivation, and perception, as well as socioeconomic factors associated with this phenomenon in different countries and age groups. Considering the fact that hookah is known by different terms such as Naghile, Bubble, Goza, and Shisha; this study covered the keywords associated with these concepts.

Results

Hookah and its different side effects constitute a significant social concern and a major social disruption factor. The increasing trend of smoking hookah among the youth has added to this concern. Up to now, numerous studies have been done regarding the prevalence of smoking hookah and its associated social factors. The results of these studies showed that many factors influenced hookah smoking. In this study, some of these factors were reviewed based on the previous researches on the issue. Out of the 84 papers collected through keyword look-up, the results of 77 papers were reviewed and included in this study. Among these papers, 73 were original surveys and 4 were review articles. In addition, 4 out of the 73 surveys were intervention analyses.

Positive viewpoints

Among the youth, the most common reasons for the inclination to smoke hookah were having fun, getting rid of sadness, passing leisure time, curiosity, having a new experience, peer pressure, and social relationship.15,18-33 Some others also believed that smoking hookah gave the feeling of maturity and masculinity.34,35 In addition, scented tobaccos played a significant role in increasing the popularity and frequency of smoking hookah among the youth.9,15-31 Among other reasons for smoking hookah, one could point to feeling of calmness and reduction of stress and fatigue.18 Moreover, numerous studies suggested that the youth believed that smoking hookah had positive psychological effects such as releasing negative excitements and stress, reducing anger and depression, forgetting one’s problems, and increasing concentration and self-efficiency.22,35-37

Individual and psychological characteristics

Individual and psychological characteristics also played a determining role in smoking hookah. The results of the studies indicated that individuals with low self-confidence and self-control were more frequently affected than others and were more easily encouraged to smoke hookah. A lack of ability to say “no” to friends’ offer, inability to resist temptation for smoking hookah, and difficulty of ignoring hookah smoking in friendly settings were the reasons why some young adults continued smoking hookah.38-40

Lack of addiction to hookah

Presumed lack of addiction to hookah is a positive viewpoint for the continuation of smoking hookah among individuals.21 Usually, a high percentage of the youth believe that the probability of addiction to hookah is low and may even be none.23,41-43 In fact, most of the individuals who smoke are sure that they can quit smoking hookah at will and believe that compared to smoking cigarette, hookah smoking is not addictive.41-43 However, there were some people within the statistical population who considered hookah smoking as addictive and quitting it as problematic as smoking cigarette.30

Individuals’ perception of risks of hookah

The results of some studies suggested that the reason for the higher prevalence of hookah smoking might be a misconception of individuals, especially the youth, regarding the low risk of smoking hookah compared to cigarette. A group of hookah smokers thought that hookah had less nicotine and chemical materials. They thought that passage of smoke through water made it somewhat healthier.20,44-53 In one study, despite the fact that individuals knew smoking hookah was accompanied by some risks for their health, they continued smoking.34 In some studies, on the other hand, individuals considered the risk of smoking hookah to be equal to or more than smoking cigarette.54-56 Individuals who smoke hookah insert a high volume of nicotine and other carcinogenic materials in tobacco into their body. All these materials significantly increase the risk of cancer and other chronic diseases. However, it is commonly believed that the water in hookah absorbs the poisons of burning tobacco and coal, and this wrong belief has led the consumers to think that hookah smoke is clean and healthy.20,44

Culture

Another influential factor regarding smoking hookah was how it was viewed by the society’s culture. This factor is distinctively significant in the Middle East, including Iran, with regard to smoking hookah. Even some smokers considered it as a hereditary issue and a desirable way to get in touch with other tribes.30,57,58 Some hookah smokers, especially adults, also believed that smoking hookah was rooted in public culture and tradition and was a social sign of communication in familial and friendly gatherings.59

Social acceptance

Social acceptance, as a cultural factor, also had a significant role in encouraging hookah smoking, especially when compared to smoking cigarette. In general, family and friends play a significant role in encouraging hookah smoking. The studies showed that a high percentage of hookah smokers considered it to be socially acceptable and believed that smoking hookah was positively viewed by others.20,23,41-44 In addition, the results of a study demonstrated that hookah smokers considered smoking as a sign of fashion in the society.60 This social characteristic associated with hookah smoking was one of the determining factors in starting, continuing, and lack of tendency to quit smoking hookah.23 On the other hand, some participants in another study considered hookah smoking as unacceptable and undesirable.32

Role of family and friends

In one study, 90% of students stated that they smoked hookah for the first time at the presence of their family and friends.37 The presence of individuals besides their families, especially parents, or having friends who smoked hookah was significantly associated with the youth’s smoking hookah.61-65 Moreover, the frequency of observing hookah smoking by relatives resulted in reduced embarrassment of smoking. This might even make it a desirable issue.23 In another study, a high percentage of parents considered smoking hookah to be undesirable for their kids.32 One can rarely find a study concerning teenagers and tobacco smoking that has not alluded the effective role of friends and learning their habits. The previous studies also supported the significance of efforts made by peers in the formation of teenagers’ psychological norms with regard to their decisions about smoking hookah. Peer pressure is, in fact, a strong stimulus for actions of teenagers during maturation. As a result, teenagers are more inclined to select the friends or be accepted by the peers who smoke hookah.66

Access

Ease of access to hookah was another reason for smoking.14,59,67 The prevalence of smoking hookah in families and coffee shops lead to young individuals’ familiarity with hookah and offer them easy access. Some studies highlighted the role of society in beginning and quitting hookah smoking. The results of a study suggested that 59% of students at universities smoked hookah for the first time in traditional restaurants and coffee houses.18 Different studies on coffee house customers revealed fun and entertainment, social association with friends and family, peer pressure, and imitation as the most significant reasons for smoking hookah in coffee houses.20,68,69 In addition, promotions regarding hookah smoking on the internet and social networks are one of the factors in encouraging hookah smoking among the youth.23 The findings of another study suggested that the students whose educational centers were near a coffee house that offered hookah were more likely to smoke hookah. Therefore, accessibility was another cause of the increase in the prevalence of smoking hookah. In fact, it seems that individuals who offer hookah in public places seek for more support and a phenomenon, such as smoking hookah, which is pleasant to consumers, will face prevailing consumption as the support is raised in the society.70

Role of religion

The results of different studies suggested that religious beliefs were reversely associated with the consumption of tobacco products, and religious reasons were found as the major factors in quitting or not smoking hookah.71,72 In fact, commitment to religious beliefs played a protective role against the consumption of tobacco products.71

Effect of state policies on hookah smoking

It seems that the legal articles about consumption of tobacco products do not sufficiently cover smoking hookah and are more concerned with smoking cigarette.73 Although state regulations play a determining role in the consumption of tobacco products (e.g., effects of price on demand for tobacco products), the studies suggested that price variation was an influential factor on demand for tobacco products.74 For instance, the studies performed in Iran indicated that increase in the price of cigarette significantly reduced its consumption.75 In addition, the participants of another study stated that passing legal codes by the government could be a significant step toward reduction of the prevalence of hookah smoking.76

Interventions to reduce hookah smoking

Since the frequency of smoking hookah was low in the previous years and it was mostly regarded as entertainment, researchers did not consider this behavior in their interventional researches. Today, however, there are organized places in cities providing hookah services, which have increased people, particularly the youth, inclination to smoking hookah.

Undoubtedly, reducing the frequency of hookah smoking requires special strategies and distinctive interventions, particularly educational interventions, in the society. In this regard, the studies pointed to the role of educational interventions based on theories and paradigms of teaching health-related issues in changing hookah smoking behavior as well as evaluation of individuals’ beliefs about quitting hookah and its associated factors. Among the advantages of using these theories in interventions for quitting hookah, one could point to the elimination of positive views toward smoking hookah, enhancing the ability to say no, and an increase of calmness and resistance against temptations for smoking hookah.18 A study on educational intervention based on BASNEF model demonstrated the effectiveness of this model in reducing the tendency to smoke hookah. The results of that study revealed a significant difference in the mean scores of viewpoint, subjective norms, and behavioral intention. The results also indicated that increase in the effect of subjective norms enhanced the participants’ behavioral intention to reduce or quit smoking hookah.77 In another study on the effect of an educational intervention based on the theory of planned behavior on changing hookah smoking behavior, the mean scores of behavioral intention and subjective norms increased in the intervention group after the training, which showed an increased inclination to reduce or quit smoking hookah.78

Apart from theory, design, location, and content of the intervention are important for reducing smoking hookah among teenagers and young adults. Some studies emphasized the positive role of school- and university-oriented interventions in reducing students’, especially the youth’s, tendency to smoke hookah in the short term.73,79

Discussion

Smoking hookah is one of the main concerns of both developing and developed communities. This study finding showed, that positive viewpoints toward hookah smoking encouraged the existing smokers to continue smoking, and that misconceptions have led to such positive viewpoints about smoking hookah. A viewpoint is an internal mood, which offers readiness for an action and is constituted by cognitive, emotional, and behavioral elements. The cognitive element refers to an individual’s information and knowledge regarding an event, subject, or action. The emotional element refers to feeling good or bad, positive or negative, and useful or non-useful. Finally, the behavioral element refers to an individual’s readiness to do an intended action. In other words, an individual’s understanding and information about a certain subject influence one’s feelings and develop a pleasant or unpleasant feeling about that subject. On the other hand, the positive or negative feelings and pleasant or unpleasant emotions influence the individual’s understanding and lead to different perceptions. Each one of these understandings and feelings influences readiness for human actions. In general, humans receive their perceptions from three major sources. First, a person experiences or touches something and obtains an understanding of it. For instance, a person individually smokes hookah and a feeling is developed inside his mind. Second, a person directly obtains information from others’ explanation; e.g., someone talking about hookah. Third, a person obtains an understanding through his personal inferences; e.g., watching an acquaintance while smoking hookah and developing a new perception.80

Numerous factors might modify an individual’s viewpoint toward a subject. Nonetheless, the noteworthy point is the stability of the viewpoint since it is the outcome of hundreds of internal and external factors. Therefore, viewpoint has a sort of stability and persistence. However, this does not mean that a thorough change in one’s viewpoint is impossible. This goal can be achieved through suitable ways and persistent endeavor. This highlights the necessity to gradually change a viewpoint. In this regard, using different theories and ideas could be effective. The findings of the studies by Momenabadi et al.77 and Sohrabi et al.81 also demonstrated that model-based interventions and training based on healthy behaviors construction increased individuals’ negative attitude toward drug abuse.

On the other hand, addiction to tobacco products has psychological dimensions. This implies that individuals with certain psychological characteristics such as low self- confidence, negative self-perception, and some personality types, might get involved in this phenomenon more than others. A large number of studies have disclosed that school-based education based on life skills was effective in the prevention of unhealthy behaviors such as drug abuse. One of these skills included the ability to say no and having self-confidence.82-85 It should also be noted that one should pay attention to individuals’ psychological characteristics in public phenomena such as smoking hookah. Yet, mere emphasis on psychological status leads to an inability to justify most of the phenomena thoroughly and define certain arrangements to deal with them. Research in Hormozgan, Iran, revealed that individuals smoked hookah with others, making it a social behavior.86 Hence, stating that someone has started smoking hookah due to certain negative psychological traits and ignoring the public aspects of smoking hookah is only offering a partial image of reality. In this regard, individuals should be encouraged toward public behaviors and sports activities.

In most cases, cultural perceptions behind smoking hookah were also among the most significant factors affecting hookah smoking. Hookah is a traditional method of drug abuse, dating back to more than 400 years ago. It is known as shisha, hookah, and arghile in different parts of the world.67,87 The traditional society of Iran also regards hookah as one of its traditional symbols. In fact, one can always trace the presence of hookah in Iranian customs and traditions. If we pay enough attention, we might observe that hookah was offered to guests based on certain rituals in the past. Because smoking hookah has been common in many societies since long time ago, it has never been critically viewed and this has contributed to its prevalence. In this regard, communication between parents and children and the existence of calm and quiet atmosphere in the family could offer a protective role in preventing the youth from the inclination to smoke cigarette and hookah. The information offered by mass media and cultural promotions regarding the negative effects of hookah could be effective, as well.

Overall, it can be concluded that smoking hookah has turned into a social phenomenon. Social phenomena refer to the issues that are outcomes of collective human behaviors; i.e., they are made under the influence of collective factors and are done and thought in public.88 The phenomenon of smoking hookah is observed in three generations, namely, grandparents, parents, and children. These three groups smoke hookah within familial and friendly gatherings in parks, parties, celebrations, and meetings. This means that this addictive substance is used during collective events or gatherings, chats, drinking, and entertainments. Sociologically speaking, we are faced with a collective action.86 This collective action could satisfy the consumption and entertainment aspects in members of familial and friendly gatherings. Because this consumptive action occurs in collective manner, it is eligible and desirable from the viewpoint of those involved and reinforces belonging to the group in the members. In fact, the feeling of belonging to groups and a kind of social identity are developed through presence in collective works and actions such as individuals’ participation in smoking hookah. In addition to entertainment and consumption, individuals desire to possess a feeling of membership in different groups. The reference group is the group that determines individuals’ direction in life and its values are accepted by the members.89,90

Family plays a critical role in the determination of the reference group and transfer of values to individuals.91 Therefore, family must have a healthy environment. In fact, families are required to be trained by school counselors or the mass media regarding the dangers of drug abuse as well as about how to treat their children to prevent adolescents and young adults from getting involved in high-risk behaviors. In addition, families must be aware that they are the main models for their children; thus, smoking hookah in the family would lead to elimination of embarrassment of smoking hookah and getting used to nicotine.

According to the study results, friends are another important factor in smoking hookah. Introduction of the modern society and less control of families over their youths and adolescents enhance the likelihood of being influenced by friends. This influence is mostly in terms of anti-social behaviors, such as smoking hookah. The previous studies have confirmed the effect of others and friends, as effective social factors, in the incidence and prevalence of harmful social behaviors, such as alcohol consumption92,93 and drug abuse.94,95 Similarly, Teraghghijah et al.,12 Repetti et al.,96 and Khader and Alsadi.72 stated that having smoker friends increased individuals’ tendency toward smoking cigarettes. This shows the necessity to train adolescents and adults regarding not befriending with unsuitable individuals and learning the ability to say no against peers’ pressure.

According to what was mentioned above, filling the youth’s free time with healthy activities, such as sports, is a preventive and protective measure against smoking hookah. If proper planning for filling the leisure time is not done, one might start smoking hookah and drugs in one’s leisure time. Therefore, one of the significant strategies for preventing the youth from smoking hookah is planning alternative activities for those who smoke hookah in their free time.

Based on the results, another reason for smoking hookah was individuals’ wrong perception of its harmlessness. WHO also mentioned wrong understanding about harmlessness of hookah smoking as one of the reasons for increase in tendency toward this behavior among adolescents and young adults. This wrong belief has resulted in an increase in the popularity of hookah in the 21st century.97 Considering the new strategies of drug production companies also, adolescents who have wrong information about harmlessness of tobacco and its impact on health are the main victims of hookah smoking.98 Hence, such incorrect thoughts and beliefs should be taken into account and individuals’ knowledge should be increased through mass media and educational interventions. On the other hand, some people consider hookah as a strategy for getting rid of cigarette, while smoking hookah has similar serious health threats. The amount of carbon monoxide resulting from hookah is also similar to that of cigarette.

The results of various studies have shown that religion plays a protective role against smoking tobacco products and reduces the probability of getting addicted to cigarette.72,99,100 This can be justified by the fact that religion somehow reinforces the meaning of life for human beings. Religion guides individuals toward selecting more balanced values and behaviors to attain a healthy life. In addition, because religious commitment is recognized as a strong and persistent factor against negative behaviors, embedding spiritual and religious dimensions in preventive and treatment plans might reduce the frequency of dangerous behaviors. Incorporation of religious programs in schools may also play a significant role in the prevention of high-risk behaviors among adolescents and young adults. In fact, religion and mental health protect human personality and dignity, while addictive drugs act against moral principles and human dignity. Evidence has indicated that reduction of religious beliefs among the youth could provide the ground for high-risk behaviors. On the other hand, commitment to religious principles could prevent social damages, moral deviations, and impacts of cultural invasion. It can also decrease inappropriate behaviors indirectly through increasing self-esteem, improving the relationship between family members, and increasing parents’ supervision.101

Based on the study findings, a lack of embarrassment about smoking hookah and its social acceptance led to an increase in the prevalence of this behavior.98 Social acceptance refers to a reference viewpoint, which shows the opinions of a wide social system. It is regarded as a norm that can be effective in selection of behaviors among society members.102 Therefore, the society must act in a way that individuals view smoking hookah as inappropriate behavior, similar to smoking cigarette, and come to the conclusion that smoking hookah does not improve their social personality among the society members.

Another reason for the high prevalence of hookah smoking is its ease of access. Provision of tobacco products and hookah in traditional restaurants and coffee houses together with traditional architecture and music has caused individuals to get together in these places, which increases their tendency toward smoking hookah.77,103 Thus, preventive programs against hookah smoking in the society requires planners, policymakers, and the related organizations to avoid establishment of such centers in the society and reduce this behavior among the youth by considering limitations for the provision of such services in restaurants and coffee houses. One of the outstanding measures to reduce consumption of tobacco products, such as hookah, might be increasing the price of tobacco along with assigning more taxes to its manufacturing. Moreover, planners and authorities have to pay more attention to the youth’s recreational activities. In some countries, including Iran, offering hookah is legally prohibited in public places. Therefore, the increasing number of restaurants and coffee houses that offer hookah should be taken into account by health planners and policymakers.

Conclusion

Experience gained in the recent years has indicated that public and private sectors lack the sufficient and essential ability to deal with hookah smoking, because this phenomenon has penetrated through different cultural layers of the society and assigning legal fines does not work against culture and might even reinforce this phenomenon in the society. The findings of the current study revealed that various personal, interpersonal, and organizational factors were effective in the prevalence of smoking hookah. Therefore, preventive interventions should be planned and implemented at social or ecological levels using health promotion theories and models. Using non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and public entities could also contribute to the prevention of tobacco consumption.

Acknowledgments

The authors highly appreciate the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for its support and making the opportunity to access the current study required resources.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

The Authors have no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349(9064):1498–504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07492-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Differences in worldwide tobacco use by gender: findings from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey. Sch Health. 2003;73(6):207–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2003.tb06562.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zareipour M, Sadeghi R, Sadeghi Tabatabaei S, Seyedi S. Effective factors on smoking based on basnef model in male students in tehran medical sciences university in 2009. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2011;9(1):23–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kiter G, Ucan ES, Ceylan E, Kilinc O. Water-pipe smoking and pulmonary functions. Respir Med. 2000;94(9):891–4. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roskin J, Aveyard P. Canadian and English students' beliefs about waterpipe smoking: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kuper H, Adami HO, Boffetta P. Tobacco use, cancer causation and public health impact. J Intern Med. 2002;251(6):455–66. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.00993.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sepetdjian E, Shihadeh A, Saliba NA. Measurementof 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in narghile waterpipe tobacco smoke. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46(5):1582–90. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Primack BA, Walsh M, Bryce C, Eissenberg T. Water-pipe tobacco smoking among middle and high school students in Arizona. Pediatrics. 2009;123(2):e282–e288. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maziak W, Eissenberg T, Rastam S, Hammal F, Asfar T, Bachir ME, et al. Beliefs and attitudes related to narghile (waterpipe) smoking among university students in Syria. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14(9):646–54. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maziak W, Ward KD, Afifi Soweid RA, Eissenberg T. Tobacco smoking using a waterpipe: a re- emerging strain in a global epidemic. Tob Control. 2004;13(4):327–33. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.008169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rastam S, Ward KD, Eissenberg T, Maziak W. Estimating the beginning of the waterpipe epidemic in Syria. BMC Public Health. 2004;4:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Teraghghijah R, Hamdeyeh M, Yaghoobi N. Predicting factors of waterpipe and smoking in Public universities students. J Res Med Sci. 2011;34(4):249–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moumennasab M, Najafi SS, Kaveh MH, Ahmadpour F. Prevalence of risky health behaviors among the students of Khorramabad Universities. Yafteh. 2006;8(2):23–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Almerie MQ, Matar HE, Salam M, Morad A, Abdulaal M, Koudsi A, et al. Cigarettes and waterpipe smoking among medical students in Syria: a cross-sectional study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12(9):1085–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fielder RL, Carey KB, Carey MP. Prevalence, frequency, and initiation of hookah tobacco smoking among first-year female college students: a one-year longitudinal study. Addict Behav. 2012;37(2):221–4. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Poyrazoglu S, Sarli S, Gencer Z, Gunay O. Waterpipe (narghile) smoking among medical and non-medical university students in Turkey. Ups J Med Sci. 2010;115(3):210–6. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2010.487164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Anjum Q, Ahmed F, Ashfaq T. Knowledge, attitude and perception of water pipe smoking (Shisha) among adolescents aged 14-19 years. J Pak Med Assoc. 2008;58(6):312–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Joveyni H, Dehdari T, Gohari MR, Gharibnavaz H. The survey of attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control of college students about hookah smoking cessation. J Health Syst Res. 2012;8(7):1311–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jamil H, Geeso SG, Arnetz BB, Arnetz JE. Risk factors for hookah smoking among arabs and chaldeans. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16(3):501–7. doi: 10.1007/s10903-013-9772-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Erbaydar NP, Bilir N, Yildiz AN. Knowledge, behaviors and health hazard perception among Turkish narghile (waterpipe)-smokers related to narghile smoking. Pak J Med Sci. 2010;26(1):195–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lipkus IM, Eissenberg T, Schwartz-Bloom RD, Prokhorov AV, Levy J. Affecting perceptions of harm and addiction among college waterpipe tobacco smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(7):599–610. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sabahy AR, Divsalar K, Bahreinifar S, Marzban M, Nakhaee N. Waterpipe tobacco use among Iranian university students: correlates and perceived reasons for use. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15(6):844–7. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.10.0744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Griffiths MA, Harmon TR, Gilly MC. Hubble bubble trouble: The need for education about and regulation of hookah smoking. J Public Policy Mark. 2011;30(1):119–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martinasek MP, McDermott RJ, Martini L. Waterpipe (hookah) tobacco smoking among youth. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2011;41(2):34–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2010.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Afifi R, Khalil J, Fouad F, Hammal F, Jarallah Y, Abu FH, et al. Social norms and attitudes linked to waterpipe use in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Soc Sci Med. 2013;98:125–34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Combrink A, Irwin N, Laudin G, Naidoo K, Plagerson S, Mathee A. High prevalence of hookah smoking among secondary school students in a disadvantaged community in Johannesburg. S Afr Med J. 2010;100(5):297–9. doi: 10.7196/samj.3965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Barnett TE, Curbow BA, Weitz JR, Johnson TM, Smith-Simone SY. Water pipe tobacco smoking among middle and high school students. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(11):2014–9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.151225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Barnett TE, Shensa A, Kim KH, Cook RL, Nuzzo E, Primack BA. The predictive utility of attitudes toward hookah tobacco smoking. Am J Health Behav. 2013;37(4):433–9. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.37.4.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Braun RE, Glassman T, Wohlwend J, Whewell A, Reindl DM. Hookah use among college students from a Midwest University. J Community Health. 2012;37(2):294–8. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9444-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hammal F, Mock J, Ward KD, Eissenberg T, Maziak W. A pleasure among friends: how narghile (waterpipe) smoking differs from cigarette smoking in Syria. Tob Control. 2008;17(2):e3. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.020529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Giuliani KK, Mire OA, Jama S, Dubois DK, Pryce D, Fahia S, et al. Tobacco use and cessation among Somalis in Minnesota. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(6 Suppl):S457–S462. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ahmed B, Jacob P, Allen F, Benowitz N. Attitudes and practices of hookah smokers in the San Francisco Bay Area. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2011;43(2):146–52. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2011.587707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Daniels KE, Roman NV. A descriptive study of the perceptions and behaviors of waterpipe use by university students in the Western Cape, South Africa. Tob Induc Dis. 2013;11(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-11-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Makhoul J, Nakkash R. Understanding youth: using qualitative methods to verify quantitative community indicators. Health Promot Pract. 2009;10(1):128–35. doi: 10.1177/1524839907301423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Khalil J, Afifi R, Fouad FM, Hammal F, Jarallah Y, Mohamed M, et al. Women and waterpipe tobacco smoking in the eastern Mediterranean region: allure or offensiveness. Women Health. 2013;53(1):100–16. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2012.753978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Griffiths MA, Ford EW. Hookah smoking: behaviors and beliefs among young consumers in the United States. Soc Work Public Health. 2014;29(1):17–26. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2011.619443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Afifi RA, Yeretzian JS, Rouhana A, Nehlawi MT, Mack A. Neighbourhood influences on narghile smoking among youth in Beirut. Eur J Public Health. 2010;20(4):456–62. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Baghianimoghadam MH, Rahaee Z, Morowatisharifabad MA, Sharifirad G, Andishmand A, Azadbakht L. Effects of education on self- monitoring of blood pressure based on BASNEF model in hypertensive patients. J Res Med Sci. 2010;15(2):70–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Tortu S, Botvin EM. Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive-behavioral approach: results of a 3-year study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990;58(4):437–46. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.58.4.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Carroll KM, Budney AJ, National Institute on Drug Abuse. Higgins ST. Therapy manuals for drug addiction. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Smith-Simone S, Maziak W, Ward KD, Eissenberg T. Waterpipe tobacco smoking: knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behavior in two U.S. samples. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(2):393–8. doi: 10.1080/14622200701825023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Abughosh S, Wu IH, Peters RJ, Essien EJ, Crutchley R. Predictors of Persistent Waterpipe Smoking Among University Students in The United States. Epidemiol. 2011;1:102. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ward KD, Eissenberg T, Gray JN, Srinivas V, Wilson N, Maziak W. Characteristics of U.S. waterpipe users: a preliminary report. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(12):1339–46. doi: 10.1080/14622200701705019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Khalil J, Heath RL, Nakkash RT, Afifi RA. The tobacco health nexus? Health messages in Narghile advertisements. Tob Control. 2009;18(5):420–1. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ghafouri N, Hirsch JD, Heydari G, Morello CM, Kuo GM, Singh RF. Waterpipe smoking among health sciences university students in Iran: perceptions, practices and patterns of use. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:496. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Giuliani KK, Mire O, Ehrlich LC, Stigler MH, Dubois DK. Characteristics and prevalence of tobacco use among Somali youth in Minnesota. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(6 Suppl 1):S48–S55. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Noonan D. A descriptive study of waterpipe smoking among college students. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2013;25(1):11–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00781.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dar-Odeh NS, Bakri FG, Al-Omiri MK, Al-Mashni HM, Eimar HA, Khraisat AS, et al. Narghile (water pipe) smoking among university students in Jordan: prevalence, pattern and beliefs. Harm Reduct J. 2010;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-7-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Smith JR, Novotny TE, Edland SD, Hofstetter CR, Lindsay SP, Al-Delaimy WK. Determinants of hookah use among high school students. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(7):565–72. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sutfin EL, McCoy TP, Reboussin BA, Wagoner KG, Spangler J, Wolfson M. Prevalence and correlates of waterpipe tobacco smoking by college students in North Carolina. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;115(1- 2):131–6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.01.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Noonan D, Patrick ME. Factors associated with perceptions of hookah addictiveness and harmfulness among young adults. Subst Abus. 2013;34(1):83–5. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2012.718251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jamil H, Janisse J, Elsouhag D, Fakhouri M, Arnetz JE, Arnetz BB. Do household smoking behaviorsconstitute a risk factor for hookah use? Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(5):384–8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Heinz AJ, Giedgowd GE, Crane NA, Veilleux JC, Conrad M, Braun AR, et al. A comprehensive examination of hookah smoking in college students: use patterns and contexts, social norms and attitudes, harm perception, psychological correlates and co- occurring substance use. Addict Behav. 2013;38(11):2751–60. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Eissenberg T, Ward KD, Smith-Simone S, Maziak W. Waterpipe tobacco smoking on a U.S. College campus: prevalence and correlates. J Adolesc Health. 2008;42(5):526–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Primack BA, Sidani J, Agarwal AA, Shadel WG, Donny EC, Eissenberg TE. Prevalence of and associations with waterpipe tobacco smoking amongU.S. university students. Ann Behav Med. 2008;36(1):81–6. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9047-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Smith SY, Curbow B, Stillman FA. Harm perception of nicotine products in college freshmen. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(9):977–82. doi: 10.1080/14622200701540796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jahanpour F, Vahedparast H, Ravanipour M, Azodi P. The trend of hookah use among adolescents and youth: A qualitative study. J Qual Res Health Sci. 2015;3(4):340–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jamil H, Templin T, Fakhouri M, Rice VH, Khouri R, Fakhouri H. Comparison of personal characteristics, tobacco use, and health states in Chaldean, Arab American, and non-Middle Eastern White adults. J Immigr Minor Health. 2009;11(4):310–7. doi: 10.1007/s10903-008-9125-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Madjzadeh Sr, Zamani G, Mousavi Kazemi SH. Qualitative survey on the factors affecting tendency to hookah in hormozgan provenice and appropriate campaign methods against it. Hakim Res J. 2002;5(3):183–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kelishadi R, Mokhtari MR, Tavasoli AA, Khosravi A, Ahangar-Nazari I, Sabet B, et al. Determinants of tobacco use among youths in Isfahan, Iran. Int J Public Health. 2007;52(3):173–9. doi: 10.1007/s00038-007-6017-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Al Nohair SF. Prevalence of smoking and its related behaviors and beliefs among secondary school students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2011;5(1):51–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Karimy M, Niknami S, Heidarnia AR, Hajizadeh E, Shamsi M. Refusal self-efficacy, self esteem, smoking refusal skills and water pipe (Hookah) smoking among Iranian male adolescents. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(12):7283–8. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.12.7283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bejjani N, El Bcheraoui C, Adib SM. The social context of tobacco products use among adolescents in Lebanon (MedSPAD-Lebanon). J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2012;2(1):15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jegh.2012.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mzayek F, Khader Y, Eissenberg T, Ward KD, Maziak W. Design, baseline results of Irbidlongitudinal, school-based smoking study. Am J Health Behav. 2011;35(6):746–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Tamim H, Al-Sahab B, Akkary G, Ghanem M, Tamim N, El Roueiheb Z, et al. Cigarette and nargileh smoking practices among school students in Beirut, Lebanon. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31(1):56–63. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.1.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Veilleux JC, Kassel JD, Heinz AJ, Braun A, Wardle MC, Greenstein J, et al. Predictors and sequelae of smoking topography over the course of a single cigarette in adolescent light smokers. J Adolesc Health. 2011;48(2):176–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Dehdari T, Jafari A, Joveyni H. Students' perspectives in Tehran University of Medical Sciences about factors affecting smoking hookah. Razi j Med Sci. 2012;19(95):17–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Al-Dabbagh S, Al-Sinjari KM. Knowledge, attitude and believes of Nargila (hubble-bubble) smoking in Iraq. J Bahrain Med Soc. 2005;17(2):128–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Israel E, El-Setouhy M, Gadalla S, Aoun el, Mikhail N, Mohamed MK. Water pipe (Sisha) smoking in cafes in Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2003;33(3 Suppl):1073–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Chaaya M, El-Roueiheb Z, Chemaitelly H, Azar G, Nasr J, Al-Sahab B. Argileh smoking among university students: a new tobacco epidemic. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6(3):457–63. doi: 10.1080/14622200410001696628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Khani Mogaddam R, Shojaezadah D, Sadeghi R, Pahlevanzadah B, Shakouri moghaddam R. Survey of prevalence and causes of the trend of hookah smoking in Tehran University Students of Medical Sciences 2010-2011. Tolooe Behdasht. 2012;11(4):103–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Khader YS, Alsadi AA. Smoking habits among university students in Jordan: prevalence and associated factors. East Mediterr Health J. 2008;14(4):897–904. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Morris DS, Fiala SC, Pawlak R. Opportunities for policy interventions to reduce youth hookah smoking in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:120082. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.120082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Dehdari T, Zarghi A, Ramazankhany A. Principles of health promotion. Tehran, Iran: Nazari publication; 2010. pp. 23–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Gorji A, Mohammadi T, Hosseini L. Cigarette price and smoking rate in 1983-2005 period in Iran. J Health Adm. 2010;12(38):31–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Highet G, Ritchie D, Platt S, Amos A, Hargreaves K, Martin C, et al. The re-shaping of the life-world: male British Bangladeshi smokers and the English smoke-free legislation. Ethn Health. 2011;16(6):519–33. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2011.578734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Momenabadi V, Iranpour A, Khanjani N, Mohseni M. Effect of educational intervention on water pipe behaviour of students in dormitories of Kermanmedical university: BASNEF model. J Health Promot Manag. 2015;4(3):12–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Joveyni H, Dehdari T, Gohari M. Waterpipe smoking in the male college students: an education intervention using theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research and Health. 2013;3(4):497–503. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Dobbins M, DeCorby K, Manske S, Goldblatt E. Effective practices for school-based tobacco use prevention. Prev Med. 2008;46(4):289–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Didarlou AR, Shojaeezadeh D, Mohammadian H. Planning health promotion Tehran-Iran. Tehran, Iran: Sobhan Publications; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sohrabi F, Hadian M, Daemi H, Asgharnezhad Farid A. The effectiveness of healthy behavior training program in changing attitude of students towards substance abuse. J Behav Sci. 2008;2(3):209–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Norman E, Turner S. Adolescent substance abuse prevention programs: Theories, models, and research in the encouraging 80's. J Prim Prev. 1993;14(1):3–20. doi: 10.1007/BF01324652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Park E. School-based smoking prevention programs for adolescents in South Korea: a systematic review. Health Educ Res. 2006;21(3):407–15. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Covell K. Adolescents and drug use in cape Breton: a focus on risk factors and prevention [Report]. Sydney, NS: Cape Breton Victoria Regional School Board; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Valente TW, Unger JB, Ritt-Olson A, Cen SY, Anderson Johnson C. The interaction of curriculum type and implementation method on 1-year smoking outcomes in a school-based prevention program. Health Educ Res. 2006;21(3):315–24. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Majdzade SR, Zamani GH, Kazemi SH. Survey of tendency of Hormozgan people to using of hubble- bubble smoking and appropriate ways to combat it. Hakim Res J. 2002;5(3):183–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991;86(9):1119–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Takano Y, Sogon S. Are Japanese more collectivistic than Americans? J Cross Cult Psychol. 2008;39(3):237–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kuper A, Kuper J. The social science encyclopedia. Milton, Abingdon: Taylor & Francis; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Dawson M, Chatman EA. Reference group theory with implications for information studies: a theoretical essay. Info Res. 2001;6(3) [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Violet D, Garland TN, Pendleton BF. High school students' marital lifestyle preferences: a test of reference group theory. Hum Relat. 1986;39(11):1056–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Urberg KA, Luo Q, Pilgrim C, Degirmencioglu SM. A two-stage model of peer influence in adolescentsubstance use: individual and relationship-specific differences in susceptibility to influence. Addict Behav. 2003;28(7):1243–56. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(02)00256-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Habibi M, Besharat M, Bahrami-Ehsan H, Rostami R, Ferrer-Wreder L. Predicting Substance use in adolescents based on risk indices and individual protective preventing, family, peers and location. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2012;4(1):43–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Sale E, Sambrano S, Springer JF, Turner CW. Risk, protection, and substance use in adolescents: a multi-site model. J Drug Educ. 2003;33(1):91–105. doi: 10.2190/LFJ0-ER64-1FVY-PA7L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Mayberry ML, Espelage DL, Koenig B. Multilevel modeling of direct effects and interactions of peers, parents, school, and community influences on adolescent substance use. J Youth Adolesc. 2009;38(8):1038–49. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9425-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Repetti RL, Taylor SE, Seeman TE. Risky families: family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychol Bull. 2002;128(2):330–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Beaglehole R, Bonita R. Global public health: A scorecard. Lancet. 2008;372(9654):1988–96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61558-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Momenan AA, Sarbandi Zaboli F, Etemadi A, Azizi F. Pattern of waterpipe (Ghalyan) use among intermediate and high school students: a cross-sectional study in Tehran, Iran. Payesh Health Monit. 2007;6(2):135–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Taremian F, Bolhari J, Pairavi H, Ghazi Tabatabaeii M. The prevalence of drug abuse among university students in Tehran. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 2008;13(4):335–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Gillum RF. Frequency of attendance at religious services and cigarette smoking in American women and men: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Prev Med. 2005;41(2):607–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ahmadi K. Relationship between religious beliefs and cultural vulnerability in the family. J Behev Sci. 2007;1(1):7–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Sapp SG, Harrod WJ. Social acceptability and intentions to eat beef: an expansion of the fishbein-ajzen model using reference group theory. Rural Sociology. 1989;54(3):420–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Maziak W, Eissenberg T, Ward KD. Patterns of waterpipe use and dependence: implications for intervention development. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2005;80(1):173–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Addiction & Health are provided here courtesy of Kerman University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES