Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) using copper-64 is a sensitive and non-invasive imaging technique for diagnosis and staging of cancer. A bifunctional chelator that can present rapid radiolabeling kinetics and high complex stability with 64Cu is a critical component for targeted PET imaging. Bifunctional chelates 3p-C-NE3TA, 3p-C-NOTA, and 3p-C-DE4TA were evaluated for complexation kinetics and stability with 64Cu in vitro and in vivo. Hexadentate 3p-C-NOTA and heptadentate 3p-C-NE3TA possess a smaller TACN-based macrocyclic backbone, while nonadentate 3p-C-DE4TA is constructed on a larger CYCLEN-based ring. The frequently explored chelates of 64Cu, octadentate C-DOTA and hexadentate C-NOTA were also comparatively evaluated. Radiolabeling kinetics of bifunctional chelators with 64Cu was assessed under mild conditions. All bifunctional chelates instantly bound to 64Cu in excellent radiolabeling efficiency at room temperature. C-DOTA was less efficient in binding 64Cu than all other chelates. All 64Cu-radiolabeled bifunctional chelates remained stable in human serum without any loss of 64Cu for 2 days. When challenged by an excess amount of EDTA, 64Cu complexes of 3p-C-NE3TA and 3p-C-NOTA were shown to be more stable than 64Cu-C-DOTA and 64Cu-C-DE4TA. 3p-C-NE3TA and 3p-C-NOTA displayed comparable in vitro and in vivo complex stability to 64Cu-C-NOTA. In vivo biodistribution result indicates that the 64Cu-radiolabeled complexes of 3p-C-NOTA and 3p-C-NE3TA possess excellent in vivo complex stability, while 64Cu-3p-C-DE4TA was dissociated as evidenced by high renal and liver retention in mice. The results of in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that the bifunctional chelates 3p-C-NOTA and 3p-C-NE3TA offer excellent chelation chemistry with 64Cu for potential PET imaging applications.
Introduction
Positron emission tomography (PET) is a nuclear imaging technique that has been used for diagnostics and staging of various cancers [1–3]. Highly energetic photons released from positron-electron annihilation process make acquisition of PET images in high resolution feasible using a molecular probe in a picomolar range [3]. Fluorine-18 (t1/2 = 110 min) has been extensively explored as a positron probe for PET imaging, and 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose (18F-FDG) is the most frequently used drug for PET imaging of cancer [1–3]. However, the short half-life of 18F and synthetic challenges in preparation of the 18F-radiolabeled molecular tracers remain limitations for broad applications of 18F-PET imaging. Among metallic radionuclides for PET imaging, copper-64 (t1/2 = 12.7 h; Emaxβ+ = 0.655 MeV; Emaxβ− = 0.573 MeV; Emaxγ = 0.511 MeV) is of great interest due to its favorable physical properties [4–6]. 64Cu can be readily produced in large quantities using a cyclotron and has longer half-life (t1/2 = 12.7 h) than fluorine-18, and its β− emission can be utilized for radiotherapy. The coordination chemistry of copper has been well studied and applied for the design of adequate chelates for efficient radiolabeling with 64Cu [7–10]. Macrocyclic chelates including DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N′,N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid), TETA (1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-N,N′,N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid), and CB-TE2A (1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclo[6.6.2]hexadecane-4,11-diacetic acid) have been evaluated for 64Cu-based PET imaging [7–9]. However, the currently available chelates of 64Cu present limitations for practical use in PET applications including preparation of 64Cu-radiolabeled chelates under harsh radiolabeling conditions and premature dissociation of 64Cu from the complexes in vivo [7,9–13]. NOTA (1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid) is a TACN (1,4,7-Triazacyclononane)-based hexadentate chelate that is known to form a stable complex with 64Cu in vitro and in vivo [14]. We previously reported NE3TA (7-[2-[carboxymethyl)amino]ethyl]-1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4-diacetic acid)-based heptadentate chelates containing both the macrocyclic TACN backbone and a pendant arm. The acyclic binding moiety appended to the TACN backbone was proposed to enhance complexation kinetics of the chelates by rapidly binding 64Cu, which can be subsequently solvated by the donors in the TACN backbone to form a stable complex. The bifunctional NE3TA analogues rapidly formed a stable complex with 64Cu [15–17]. The bifunctional chelates C-NE3TA (7-[2-[carboxymethyl)amino]-3-(4-nitrophenyl)propyl]-1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4-diacetic acid) and N-NE3TA (7-[2-[(carboxymethyl)amino]-2-(4-nitrophenyl)methyl]-1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4-diacetic acid) were shown to have superior in vivo stability than 64Cu-C-DOTA complex.[15] Both C-NE3TA and N-NE3TA conjugated to a tumor targeting biomolecule (transferrin) rapidly bound to 64Cu at room temperature [18]. N-NE3TA-trasnferrin conjugate was slightly more efficient in binding 64Cu than C-NE3TA-transferrin conjugate. 64Cu-radiolabeled N-NE3TA-transferrin conjugate remained in human serum for 48 h and displayed rapid blood clearance and increasing tumor uptake in PC-3 tumor bearing mice over a 24 h period [18].
In this study, the potential bifunctional chelates 3p-C-NOTA, 3p-C-NE3TA, and 3p-C-DE4TA (Figure 1) along with the standard chelates C-NOTA and C-DOTA were comparatively evaluated for radiolabeling kinetics and in vitro and in vivo complex stability with 64Cu. TACN-based chelates 3p-C-NOTA and 3p-C-NE3TA contains six and seven coordinating groups, respectively. 3p-C-DE4TA with nine donors is constructed on relatively larger macrocyclic cyclen (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane) backbone. All of the chelates studied contain a longer propyl chain which connects the chelating backbone to the functional group (para-nitro-phenyl) for conjugation to a biomolecule. In contrast, C-NOTA and C-DOTA (2-(4-nitrobenzyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid) contains a methyl spacer. The relatively long alkyl spacer of the present chelates was proposed to reduce steric hindrance in metal complexation of the chelate conjugated to a protein. The bifunctional chelates were evaluated for radiolabeling kinetics with 64Cu, and in vitro stability of 64Cu-radiolabeled complexes was evaluated in human serum and excess EDTA solution. In vivo stability of 64Cu-radiolabeled complexes was also assessed by conducting a biodistribution study in mice.
Figure 1. Bifunctional Chelators of 64Cu in preclinical evaluation for targeted PET imaging.
Experimental
Instruments and materials
Analytical HPLC was performed on an Agilent 1200 equipped with a diode array detector (λ = 254 and 280 nm), thermostat set at 35 °C, and a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 80 Å). Ultrapure ammonium acetate was purchased from Aldrich. Ultrapure HCl was purchased from Fisher Scientific. Radio-TLC was performed on a TLC scanner (Bioscan, B-FC-1000). 64Cu in the chloride form (specific activity of 248 mCi/μg) was obtained from Washington University (Saint. Louis, MO).
Complexation formation kinetics of chelates with 64Cu
Bifunctional chelates 3p-C-NOTA, 3p-C-NE3TA, 3p-C-DE4TA were prepared as previously reported [19]. C-DOTA were purchased from Macrocyclics (Dallas, TX). C-NOTA in the form of NH2 was prepared by the method reported in the literature [20]. All HCl solutions were prepared from ultrapure HCl (Fisher Scientific). For metal-free radiolabeling, plasticware including pipette tips, tubes, and caps was soaked in 0.1M HCl overnight and washed thoroughly with Milli-Q (18 MΩ) water, and air-dried overnight. Ultrapure ammonium acetate was used to prepare buffer solutions (0.25 M, pH 5.5). 0.25M NH4OAc buffer solution (pH 5.5) using 0.1M and 1M HCl solution was prepared and chelexed, shaken overnight at room temperature, and filtered through 0.22μM filter (Corning) prior to use. The stock solution of the radioisotopes (0.013 μL, 9 mCi) was diluted to 125 μL by adding 0.05M HCl solution (112 μL). TLC plates (6.6 × 1 cm or 6.6 × 2 cm, Silica gel 60 F254, EMD Chemicals Inc., #5554-7) with the origin line drawn at 0.6 cm from the bottom were prepared. To a buffer solution (0.25M NH4OAc, pH 5.5) in a capped microcentrifuge tube (1.5 mL) was sequentially added a solution of the chelator in the buffer (30 μg) and 64Cu in 0.05M HCl (90 μCi). The total volume of the resulting solution was 60 μL. The reaction mixture was agitated on the thermomixer (Eppendorf, 5355) set at 1,000 rpm at room temperature for 30 min. The labeling efficiency was determined by TLC eluted with 20 mM EDTA/0.15M NH4OAc as the mobile phase. A solution of radiolabeled complexes (2.0 μL) was withdrawn at the designated time points (1 min, 10 min, and 30 min), spotted on a TLC plate, and then eluted with the mobile phase. After completion of elution, the TLC plate was warmed and dried on the surface of a hot plate maintained at 35 °C and scanned using TLC scanner (Bioscan, B-FC-1000). Bound and unbound copper-64 appeared 30~40 mm (Rf = 0.54) and 48~55 mm (Rf = 0.94).
In vitro serum stability of 64Cu-radiolabeled complexes
Human serum was purchased from Gemini Bioproducts (#100110). 64Cu-radiolabeled complexes were prepared by reaction of the chelators (30 μg) with 64Cu (90 μCi) in 0.25M NH4OAc buffer (pH 5.5) for 1 h at room temperature or 90 °C (for C-DOTA). The total volume of the final solution was 10 μL. The labeling efficiency of the radiolabeled complexes were found to be ~100% as determined by TLC. The freshly prepared radiolabeled complexes were directly used for serum stability studies without further purification. 64Cu-radiolabeled complex (~75 μCi, ~ 10 μL) was added to human serum (90 μL) in a microcentrifuge tube. 64Cu-3p-C-DE4TA were prepared by reaction of the chelators (10 μg) with 64Cu (30 μCi) in 0.25M NH4OAc buffer (pH 5.5) for 1 h at room temperature. The total volume of the final solution was 20 μL. The labeling efficiency of the radiolabeled complexes were found to be ~100% as determined by TLC. 64Cu-radiolabeled complex (~7 μCi, ~ 20 μL) was added to human serum (60 μL) in a microcentrifuge tube. The stability of 64Cu-radiolabeled complexes in human serum was evaluated at 37 °C for 2 days using TLC and HPLC (solvent A: 0.1% TFA in H2O, solvent B: 0.1% TFA in CH3CN, 0–100% B/15 min, flow rate: 1 mL/min). 64Cu-EDTA complex was eluted early (tR = ~ 2.5 min), while 64Cu-radiolabeled complexes of the chelators have retention time at 8~8.3 min.
EDTA Challenge
64Cu-radiolabeled complexes were prepared by reaction of each chelator (10 μg) with 64Cu (30 μCi) in 0.25M NH4OAc buffer (pH 5.5) for 1 h at room temperature. The total volume of the resulting solution was 20 μL. The freshly prepared radiolabeled complexes were directly used for EDTA challenge experiment without further purification. A solution of the 64Cu-radiolabeled complex containing each chelator (1 mM) in 0.25M NH4OAc buffer was mixed with a solution of EDTA (100 mM, H2O, pH 5.0) at a 100-fold molar excess. The resulting mixture was incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The stability of 64Cu-radiolabeled complexes in the solution was evaluated using TLC (20 mM EDTA in 0.15M NH4OAc). Bound and unbound radioisotope appeared 30~40 mm (Rf = 0.54) and 48~55 mm (Rf = 0.94) from the bottom of the TLC plate, respectively. Stability of the complexes was also evaluated at 25 h time point by HPLC (solvent A: 0.1% TFA in H2O, solvent B: 0.1% TFA in CH3CN, 0–100% B/15 min, flow rate: 1 mL/min). 64Cu-EDTA complex was eluted early (tR = ~ 2.5 min). 64Cu-radiolabeled complex of 3p-C-NE3TA, 3p-C-NOTA, 3p-C-DE4TA, C-NOTA (in the NH2 form), and C-DOTA have the respective retention time (tR = 8.2, 8.0, 7.8, 4.2, 7.5 min).
Biodistribution
All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines established by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Missouri and the Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans’ Hospital Subcommittee for Animal Studies. Six to eight week old CF-1 mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories and housed one week prior to the studies. An aliquot of 64Cu-radiolabeled complex (60 μCi) was prepared as described above and intravenously injected via the tail vein in phosphate-buffered saline (100 μL). At 1 h, 4 h and 24 h post-injection, mice were sacrificed and blood, liver, kidney, muscle and bone were collected, weighed and counted in a gamma counter. The radioactivity from each tissue/organ was decay-corrected by a known aliquot of the injected dose, and the percent-injected dose per gram of tissue (% ID/g) was calculated. Values are presented as mean ± SD for each group of 3 mice.
Results and Discussion
The new chelates 3p-C-NE3TA, 3p-C-NOTA, and 3p-C-DE4TA were evaluated for complexation with 64Cu. Among the known bifunctional chelators of 64Cu, C-DOTA and C-NOTA were selected for the present study on comparative evaluation for radiolabeling with 64Cu at room temperature. C-NOTA rapidly forms a stable complex with 64Cu and possesses superior radiolabeling kinetics and complex stability with 64Cu than C-DOTA [14,15]. C-NOTA analogues have been extensively explored for development of 64Cu-based radiopharmaceuticals [21–23]. Radiolabeling efficiency of the chelates in binding 64Cu was measured at room temperature in duplicate using TLC and HPLC (Table 1). The new chelates 3p-C-NE3TA, 3p-C-NOTA, and 3p-C-DE4TA instantly bound to 64Cu at room temperature and pH 5.5, and radiolabeling was almost complete at the beginning of the measurement (>99% radiolabeling efficiency, 3 μCi/μg specific activity, 1 min, RT). As expected, C-NOTA was extremely rapid in binding 64Cu, while C-DOTA display slower radiolabeling kinetics when compared to all other chelates studied (Table 1). 3p-C-NETA, 3p-C-NOTA, and C-NOTA completely bound to Cu-64 at 30 min as evidenced by both TLC and HPLC analysis. However, radiolabeling of C-DOTA with 64Cu was incomplete at 30 min time point. The noted difference in Cu-64 radiolabeling efficiency of C-DOTA measured by TLC (95.4%) and HPLC (88.6%) seems to be related to formation of less stable 64Cu-C-DOTA complexes that can be dissociated during TLC and HPLC analysis.
Table 1.
Evaluation of bifunctional ligands for radiolabeling efficiency (%) with 64Cu (room temperature, 0.25M NH4OAC, pH 5.5) using TLC and HPLC (parentheses).+
| Bound 64Cu complex (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Time | 3p-C-NOTA | 3p-C-NE3TA | 3p-C-DE4TA | C-NOTA* | C-DOTA |
| 1 min | 99.7 ± 0.2 | 99.9 ± 0.0 | 99.6 ± 0.3 | 99.8 ± 0.1 | 92.4 ± 0.7 |
| 10 min | 99.9 ± 0.1 | 99.8 ± 0.1 | 99.9 ± 0.1 | 99.8 ± 0.1 | 94.6 ± 0.4 |
| 30 min | 100.0 ± 0.1 (99.1 ± 0.8) | 100.0 ± 0.1 (100.0 ± 0.0) | 100.0 ± 0.1 | 99.9 ± 0.1 (100.0 ± 0.1) | 95.4 ± 0.1 (88.6 ± 0.4) |
Radiolabeling efficiency was measured in duplicate;
C-NOTA in the NH2 form
The 64Cu-radiolabeled chelates were further evaluated for complex stability in human serum and excess EDTA solution. Copper-64 complexes of 3p-C-NOTA, 3p-C-NE3TA, 3p-C-DE4TA, and C-NOTA were readily prepared by reaction of each chelator with 64Cu for 1 h at room temperature (pH 5.5, 100% radiolabeling efficiency, TLC). However, complete radiolabeling of C-DOTA with 64Cu required significantly longer time (5 h) at room temperature. Therefore, 64Cu-C-DOTA for the in vitro complex stability studies was prepared from reaction of C-DOTA with 64Cu for 1 h at 90 °C.
Human serum stability studies of 64Cu-radiolabeled chelates were performed to determine if the complexes remained stable without loss of 64Cu (37 °C, pH 7). Stability was assessed by measuring the transfer of 64Cu from the complex to serum proteins over the course of 2 days using TLC and HPLC (Table 2 and Supporting Information). All 64Cu-radiolabeled chelates remained stable in human serum without 64Cu being released into the serum over 2 days. Stability of 64Cu-radiolabeled complexes was further evaluated by challenging the complexes with EDTA at 100-fold molar excess (Table 3, Figure 2, and Supporting Information). 64Cu-3p-C-NOTA, 64Cu-3p-C-NE3TA, and C-NOTA remained intact in the EDTA solution for 24 h of incubation. The 64Cu complex of 3p-C-DE4TA with nine donors was not able to hold 64Cu stably, and a significant amount of 64Cu was transchelated from the chelate to EDTA over a 24 h incubation time (~55%). Copper-64-C-DOTA released >5% of 64Cu into the EDTA solution.
Table 2.
Evaluation of 64Cu-radiolabeled complexes for in vitro stability in human serum (37 °C, pH 7) using TLC and HPLC (parentheses).+
| Bound 64Cu complex (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Time | 3p-C-NE3TA | 3p-C-NOTA | 3p-C-DE4TA | C-NOTA* | C-DOTA |
| 0 h | 99.9 ± 0.1 (99.8 ± 0.3) | 99.9 ± 0.1 (99.8 ± 0.1) | 99.9 ± 0.0 (99.9 ± 0.1) | 99.9 ± 0.0 (100.0 ± 0.0) | 99.8 ± 0.1 (100.0 ± 0.0) |
| 24 h | 99.8 ± 0.3 (99.9 ± 0.1) | 100.0 ± 0.1 (99.9 ± 0.1) | 100.0 ± 0.0 (99.5 ± 0.3) | 99.8 ± 0.1 (99.9 ± 0.2) | 99.8 ± 0.2 (99.7 ± 0.1) |
| 48 h | 100.0 ± 0.1 (99.9 ± 0.1) | 99.9 ± 0.0 (99.9 ± 0.2) | 99.9 ± 0.1 (100.0 ± 0.0) | 99.9 ± 0.1 (99.9 ± 0.1) | 100.0 ± 0.1 (99.6 ± 0.1) |
bound 64Cu complex (%) was measured in duplicate;
C-NOTA in the NH2 form
Table 3.
EDTA challenge of chelators with 64Cu (37 °C, 0.25M NH4OAC, pH 5.5) using TLC and HPLC (parentheses).+
| Bound 64Cu complex (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Time | 3p-C-NE3TA | 3p-C-NOTA | 3p-C-DE4TA | C-NOTA* | C-DOTA |
| 0 h | 99.9 ± 0.1 | 100.0 ± 0.1 | 99.9± 0.2 | 99.9 ± 0.0 | 99.9 ± 0.0 |
| 1 h | 99.9 ± 0.1 | 100.0 ± 0.1 | 98.0 ± 0.8 | 99.9 ± 0.1 | 99.6 ± 0.0 |
| 24 h | 99.2 ± 0.1 (97.4 ± 0.4) | 99.6 ± 0.4 (98.0 ± 0.2) | 56.5 ± 1.1 (50.5 ± 0.9) | 99.7 ± 0.0 (99.0 ± 0.2) | 97.0 ± 0.5 (94.3 ± 0.4) |
bound 64Cu complex (%) was measured in duplicate;
C-NOTA in the NH2 form
Figure 2. HPLC chromatograms of 64Cu-radiolabeled complexes in a solution of EDTA at 100-fold molar excess at 24 h post-incubation.
(eluent: 0.1% TFA in H2O, 100% to 0%/0.1% TFA in ACN, 0% to 100%).
The in vivo stability of 64Cu-radiolabeled chelates was evaluated by a biodistribution study using non-tumor bearing CF-1 mice (i.v. injection, n = 3). After injection of 64Cu-radiolabeled chelates, radioactivity accumulation in harvested organs and blood was measured at 1 h, 4 h, and 24 h post-injection (Figure 3 and Supporting Information). 64Cu-3p-C-NE3TA almost completely disappeared from the blood and all organs at 24 h post injection. The level of the radioactivity accumulated in the blood and in the organs was negligible (<0.2% ID/g) at 24 h post injection. The highest uptake of the tracer was observed in the kidney at 1 h post-injection (3.0% ID/g). The liver (2.5% ID/g at 1 h) cleared quickly, having less than 0.1% ID/g remaining at 24 h. No considerable accumulation of the tracer was detected in blood, muscle, and bone during the period of study. Copper-64-3p-C-NOTA displayed its highest uptake in the liver at 1 h (3.6% ID/g). However, the tracer rapidly disappeared by 24 h (<0.6% ID/g). The radioactivity retained in the kidney at 1 h (1.1% ID/g) cleared out by 24 h. Uptake of radioactivity in the blood and in the other organs was not significant at any time point. Significant radioactivity was released from 64Cu-3p-C-DE4TA and accumulated in liver and kidney at 1 h (14.3% and 8.2%, respectively), and the radioactivity was retained in these organs at 24 h (11.1% and 5.7%, respectively). Blood, bone, and muscle had low levels of the tracer at 24 h (1.5%, 1.4%, and 0.5%, respectively). The biodistribution data indicate that 3p-C-NOTA and 3p-C-NE3TA cleared well in vivo but 64Cu-3p-C-DE4TA showed substantially higher uptake and retention in the key organs. The instability of the DE4TA complex to EDTA challenge leads us to believe that the chelate dissociated in vivo.
Figure 3. Biodistribution of 64Cu-radiolabeled bifunctional chelates in non-tumor bearing CF-1 mice.
Cu(II) with the prevalent oxidation state of +2 has a small ionic radius (73 pm) for coordination number 6 [24]. The borderline hard and soft Cu(II) is reported to adopt five or six coordination and display high affinity for nitrogen, oxygen, or sulfur donors such as aromatic nitrogens, thiol, amide, aminocarboxylate, and hydroxyl group [7,25.26].
The macrocyclic chelate NOTA with three nitrogens and three oxygen donors forms a stable hexacoordinate complex [25,27]. Hexa-coordination of Cu(II) with the four nitrogens in the cyclen backbone and two pendant carboxylate oxygens in DOTA produced Cu(II)-DOTA complex with high thermodynamic stability [28]. Copper-64-NOTA was reported to have more favorable complex stability and resistance to transchelation than 64Cu-DOTA in vivo [15,21–23,29]. It is speculated that the higher kinetic stability of 64Cu-NOTA relative with 64Cu-DOTA stems from more favorable size-fit of Cu(II) to the smaller ring TACN.
The complexation radiolabeling and EDTA challenge data confirm that C-DOTA with a larger macrocyclic cavity and higher denticity forms less stable complex with Cu(II) than the TACN-based hexadentate C-NOTA. It should be noted that 64Cu-C-DOTA complex for the present studies of in vitro stability was prepared from radiolabeling of C-DOTA with 64Cu at 90 °C for 1 h, while all other chelates were well labeled with 64Cu at RT. Under the harsh radiolabeling condition, C-DOTA was expected to form thermodynamically more stable complex as reaction of C-DOTA at room temperature could produce less stable intermediate 64Cu-C-DOTA complexes [30]. However, 64Cu-C-DOTA was found to be less stable than C-NOTA and other TACN-based chelates 3p-C-NOTA and 3p-C-NE3TA when challenged by excess EDTA.
In our previous studies, C-DOTA and C-NOTA were comparatively evaluated for in vivo complex stability with 64Cu, and C-NOTA displayed superior in vivo stability than C-DOTA [15]. Copper-64-labeled C-DOTA was shown to have higher uptake in all tissues at all time points than 64Cu-C-NOTA (1, 4, and 24 h post-injection, n =4, female SCID mice). Particularly, significant radioactivity was retained in the liver for 64Cu-C-DOTA (78% at 24 h when compared to 1 h), while 64Cu-C-NOTA displayed lower uptake in the liver at all time points (3% retention at 24 h when compared to 1 h) [15].
C-NOTA is built on a small macrocyclic cavity which is expected to be less dynamic in binding a metal than acyclic chelators [20,31]. 3p-C-NE3TA contains the same TACN backbone as NOTA [19]. In virtue of the acyclic bidentate arm, 3p-C-NE3TA was expected to form a complex with Cu(II) more rapidly. However, the predicted dynamic binding of 3p-C-NE3TA with Cu(II) using seven donors could form a less stable complex than C-NOTA. The in vitro and in vivo data indicate that 3p-C-NE3TA was extremely rapid in binding Cu(II) and formed a stable complex with Cu(II), and 64Cu-3p-C-NE3TA was well tolerated in the EDTA challenge and produced excellent biodistribution profile in mice. 64Cu-3p-C-NE3TA displayed rapid clearance from the liver and kidney and negligible retention in all organs at 24 time point. 3p-C-NE3TA displayed comparable chelation chemistry with 64Cu to C-NOTA. As expected, the CYCLEN-based 3p-C-DE4TA with nine donors rapidly bound to Cu(II) but formed a complex with very low kinetic stability as evidenced by EDTA challenge and biodistribution data. Both C-DOTA and 3p-C-DE4TA are structured on the same macrocyclic backbone (CYCLEN). C-DOTA with 8 donors was found to form kinetically more inert complex with 64Cu than 3p-C-DE4TA with 9 donors. 64Cu-C-DOTA was more resistant to transchelation with EDTA than 64Cu-3p-C-DE4TA. Higher retention of 64Cu in the liver and kidney was observed with 64Cu-3p-C-DE4TA (11.0% and 5.7% ID/g, respectively, Figure 3 and Supporting Information) when compared to 64Cu-C-DOTA (3.8% and 2.4%, respectively) [15]. It appears that the enhanced kinetic stability of 64Cu-C-DOTA relative to 64Cu-3p-C-DE4TA is partly attributed to denticity of the chelates.
Conclusion
The bifunctional chelators 3p-C-NE3TA, 3p-C-NOTA, and 3p-C-DE4TA were evaluated for their potential use in 64Cu-based PET imaging applications. All the chelators instantly and almost completely bound to 64Cu at room temperature. The corresponding 64Cu-radiolabeled chelates showed high in vitro serum stability, releasing no considerable radioactivity over 2 days. Copper-64 complexes of hexadentate (3p-C-NOTA) and heptadentate (3p-C-NE3TA) remained quite stable when challenged with EDTA. However, copper-64 complexes of C-DOTA (octadentate) and 3p-C-DE4TA (nonadentate) released a considerable amount of 64Cu, which was gradually transchelated to EDTA. 64Cu-3p-C-NOTA and 64Cu-3p-C-NE3TA produced excellent biodistribution profiles and displayed low retention in all organs and blood over the entire period of the study. 64Cu-radiolabeled 3p-C-DE4TA with nine donors was shown to undergo dissociation in vivo and have high retention in the liver. The in vitro and in vivo results suggest that 3p-C-NE3TA and 3p-C-NOTA possess superior chelation chemistry with 64Cu relative to 3p-C-DEPTA and C-DOTA structured on the cyclen backbone and great promise for development of molecular PET imaging probes.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health (2R01CA112503). We also thank the Department of Veterans Affairs, for providing resources and use of facilities at the Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans’ Hospital in Columbia, MO.
References
- 1.Rohren EM, Turkington TG, Coleman RE. Radiology. 2004;231:305–32. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2312021185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gambhir SS. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:683–93. doi: 10.1038/nrc882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ametamey SM, Honer M, Schubiger PA. Chem Rev. 2008;108:1501–16. doi: 10.1021/cr0782426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shokeen M, Anderson CJ. Acc Chem Res. 2009;42:832–41. doi: 10.1021/ar800255q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cutler CS, Hennkens HM, Sisay N, Huclier-Markai S, Jurisson SS. Chem Rev. 2013;113:858–83. doi: 10.1021/cr3003104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nayak TK, Brechbiel MW. Bioconjugate Chem. 2009;20:825–41. doi: 10.1021/bc800299f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Smith SV. J Inorg Biochem. 2004;98:1874–901. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wadas TJ, Wong EH, Weisman GR, Anderson CJ. Curr Pharm Des. 2007;13:3–16. doi: 10.2174/138161207779313768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cai Z, Anderson CJ. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2014;57:224–30. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pandya DN, Bhatt N, Dale AV, Kim JY, Lee H, Ha YS, Lee JE, An GI, Yoo J. Bioconjugate Chem. 2013;24:1356–66. doi: 10.1021/bc400192a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sun X, Wuest M, Weisman GR, Wong EH, Reed DP, Boswell CA, Motekaitis R, Martell AE, Welch MJ, Anderson CJ. J Med Chem. 2002;45:469–77. doi: 10.1021/jm0103817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bass LA, Wang M, Welch MJ, Anderson CJ. Bioconjugate Chem. 2000;11:527–32. doi: 10.1021/bc990167l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Boswell CA, Sun X, Niu W, Weisman GR, Wong EH, Rheingold AL, Anderson CJ. J Med Chem. 2004;47:1465–74. doi: 10.1021/jm030383m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cooper MS, Ma MT, Sunassee K, Shaw KP, Williams JD, Paul RL, Donnelly PS, Blower PJ. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012;23:1029–39. doi: 10.1021/bc300037w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.De Silva RA, Jain S, Lears KA, Chong HS, Kang CS, Sun X, Rogers BE. Nucl Med Biol. 2012;39:1099–104. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2012.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chong HS, Mhaske S, Lin M, Bhuniya S, Song HA, Brechbiel MW, Sun X. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007;17:6107–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.09.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chong H-S, Chen Y, Kang CS, Sun X, Wu N. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2015;25:1082–85. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kang CS, Wu N, Chen Y, Sun X, Bandara N, Liu D, Lewis M, Rogers B, Chong H-S. J Inorg Biochem. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2015.10.012. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chong HS, Sun X, Chen Y, Sin I, Kang CS, Lewis MR, Liu D, Ruthengael VC, Zhong Y, Wu N, Song HA. Bioorg Med Chem. 2015;23:1169–78. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.12.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McMurry TJ, Brechbiel M, Wu C, Gansow OA. Bioconjugate Chem. 1993;4:236–245. doi: 10.1021/bc00021a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ait-Mohand S, Fournier P, Dumulon-Perreault V, Kiefer GE, Jurek P, Ferreira CL, Bénard F, Guérin B. Bioconjugate Chem. 2011;22:1729–1735. doi: 10.1021/bc2002665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nedrow JR, White AG, Modi J, Nguyen K, Chang AJ, Anderson CJ. Mol Imaging. 2014;13:1–13. doi: 10.2310/7290.2014.00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Prasanphanich AF, Nanda PK, Rold TL, Ma L, Lewis MR, Garrison JC, Hoffman TJ, Sieckman GL, Figueroa SD, Smith CJ. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104:12462–12467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705347104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shannon RD. Acta Crys. 1976;A32:751–67. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hancock RD, Martell AE. Chem Rev. 1989;89:1875–1914. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wadas TJ, Wong EH, Weisman GR, Anderson CJ. Chem Rev. 2010;110:2858–2902. doi: 10.1021/cr900325h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wieghardt K, Bossek U, Chaudhuri P, Herrmann W, Menke BC, Weiss J. Inorg Chem. 1982;21:4308–14. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Riesen A, Zehnder M, Kaden TA. Helv Chim Acta. 1986;69:2067–2073. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fani M, Del Pozzo L, Abirai K, Mansi R, Tamma ML, Cescato R, Waser B, Waser WA, Reubi JC, Maecke HR. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1110–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.087999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Moreau J, Guillion E, Pierrard J-C, Rimbault J, Port M, Aplincourt M. Chem Eur J. 2004;10:5218–32. doi: 10.1002/chem.200400006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Studer M, Meares CF. Bioconjugate Chem. 1992;3:337–341. doi: 10.1021/bc00016a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



