Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2016 Nov 21;82(24):7165–7175. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01746-16

Genomic Comparison of Campylobacter spp. and Their Potential for Zoonotic Transmission between Birds, Primates, and Livestock

Allison M Weis a, Dylan B Storey a,*, Conor C Taff b,*, Andrea K Townsend b,*, Bihua C Huang a, Nguyet T Kong a, Kristin A Clothier c, Abigail Spinner d, Barbara A Byrne e, Bart C Weimer a,
Editor: C A Elkinsf
PMCID: PMC5118927  PMID: 27736787

ABSTRACT

Campylobacter is the leading cause of human gastroenteritis worldwide. Wild birds, including American crows, are abundant in urban, suburban, and agricultural settings and are likely zoonotic vectors of Campylobacter. Their proximity to humans and livestock increases the potential spreading of Campylobacter via crows between the environment, livestock, and humans. However, no studies have definitively demonstrated that crows are a vector for pathogenic Campylobacter. We used genomics to evaluate the zoonotic and pathogenic potential of Campylobacter from crows to other animals with 184 isolates obtained from crows, chickens, cows, sheep, goats, humans, and nonhuman primates. Whole-genome analysis uncovered two distinct clades of Campylobacter jejuni genotypes; the first contained genotypes found only in crows, while a second genotype contained “generalist” genomes that were isolated from multiple host species, including isolates implicated in human disease, primate gastroenteritis, and livestock abortion. Two major β-lactamase genes were observed frequently in these genomes (oxa-184, 55%, and oxa-61, 29%), where oxa-184 was associated only with crows and oxa-61 was associated with generalists. Mutations in gyrA, indicative of fluoroquinolone resistance, were observed in 14% of the isolates. Tetracycline resistance (tetO) was present in 22% of the isolates, yet it occurred in 91% of the abortion isolates. Virulence genes were distributed throughout the genomes; however, cdtC alleles recapitulated the crow-only and generalist clades. A specific cdtC allele was associated with abortion in livestock and was concomitant with tetO. These findings indicate that crows harboring a generalist C. jejuni genotype may act as a vector for the zoonotic transmission of Campylobacter.

IMPORTANCE This study examined the link between public health and the genomic variation of Campylobacter in relation to disease in humans, primates, and livestock. Use of large-scale whole-genome sequencing enabled population-level assessment to find new genes that are linked to livestock disease. With 184 Campylobacter genomes, we assessed virulence traits, antibiotic resistance susceptibility, and the potential for zoonotic transfer to observe that there is a “generalist” genotype that may move between host species.

INTRODUCTION

Campylobacter is a motile Gram-negative spiral bacterium that causes gastroenteritis in humans and other animals (1, 2). In livestock, Campylobacter may cause abortion in addition to gastroenteritis (3). It is one of the most common foodborne zoonotic pathogens worldwide and is often transmitted via the fecal-oral route through the consumption of contaminated food or water (1, 2). In the United States, campylobacteriosis is estimated to affect more than 1.3 million people each year, with symptoms including fever, abdominal cramping, and bloody diarrhea (1, 4, 5). Internationally, campylobacteriosis is a significant public health burden; the incidence in developed nations is estimated to be 4.4 to 9.3 per 1,000 people yearly and is a substantial cause of morbidity in developing nations (6). In rare and severe cases, infection can lead to chronic autoimmune disorders, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and Miller Fisher syndrome (7, 8). Outbreaks in the United States are largely attributed to contaminated poultry and water and are commonly associated with unpasteurized milk (1, 4, 5, 9). Despite many efforts to contain and abate Campylobacter jejuni outbreaks, national and international reduction goals remain unmet and the number of new cases continues to increase yearly (6, 1012).

Recent research has focused on uncovering the initial sources of human infection. Birds are considered to be a primary host of Campylobacter, which is a commensal organism in a broad range of wild bird populations, including black-headed gulls (Chroicocephalus ridibundus), Sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis), European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), and American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) (1315). C. jejuni isolates from these birds have been implicated in human disease (11, 16, 17). Other studies indicate that some Campylobacter isolates found in wild birds may not be pathogenic to humans (14, 1823). These conflicting reports indicate that studies using higher resolution molecular methods may provide insights to more precisely assess Campylobacter isolates from wild birds so as to gauge their importance to food safety and public health.

To date, most studies have used 16S rRNA, fla typing, or multilocus sequence typing (MLST) to characterize isolates and examine zoonotic transmission. Unfortunately, the resolutions of these methods have limited the conclusions that can be drawn. While 16S sequencing has been used historically to assess microbial diversity, it underestimates the genome variation within a species (24, 25). The MLST method, which uses five to seven genes to build a classification system, is more robust than 16S sequencing and has been used in many studies (2628). To date, however, the application of taxonomically conserved housekeeping genes, while phylogenetically useful, does not include biologically informative genes, such as virulence factors (29), thereby limiting conclusions about potential pathogenicity. Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in understanding C. jejuni pathogenicity and transmission (18, 21, 23, 30); however, to date, studies of Campylobacter in wild birds have not taken advantage of WGS approaches to define the genotypes that are associated with zoonotic transmission and virulence.

The American crow is a North American passerine that forages in a variety of settings, including dumps, feedlots, pastures, and urban areas. As such, American crows have the potential to transfer pathogens from human waste or infected animal manure to human food, waterways, and livestock, potentially acting as both a reservoir and a transport host (22). Previous studies indicate that Campylobacter prevalence is high in crow species around the world. Corvids from Japan, New Zealand, Malaysia, and Tanzania harbor Campylobacter with prevalences ranging from 34% to 43% (3135). Likewise, 67% of free-ranging American crows in the Sacramento Valley, California, tested positive for C. jejuni (22). Crow social behavior may contribute to high infection rates in crows, and foraging patterns may amplify the risk of zoonotic transmission in specific areas, such as feedlots, where many species intermingle (36). The sequencing of 16S rRNA revealed that many of those isolates were similar to C. jejuni strains that were isolated from human clinical samples (22).

We used WGS to compare the genomes of 100 Campylobacter species isolates (97 C. jejuni isolates) that were collected from crows between 2012 and 2014 in the Sacramento Valley, California, with 60 Campylobacter species isolates from nonhuman primates, chickens, sheep, cows, and goats from the same geographic region. We examined evidence for genetic traits that are indicative of pathogenicity and zoonotic potential from published Campylobacter species whole-genome sequences for a total of 184 genomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolates sequenced.

In addition to the 100 Campylobacter species isolates from crows (22), isolates were collected from rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) between 2014 and 2015 from the California National Primate Center (CNPRC), an open-air facility housing ∼5,000 macaques (47 isolates); from cases of abortion in bovine, ovine, and caprine fetuses (9 isolates); and from chickens collected by the UC Davis Veterinary Medicine Teaching Hospital (VMTH) between 2014 and 2015. The genomes of isolates collected during this study were compared to genomes in NCBI GenBank, which were isolated mainly from humans, chickens, and an ovine abortion case.

Crow and primate sampling.

Sample collection of Campylobacter was done as described previously (22). Briefly, fecal or cloacal swab samples were collected from American crows (hereafter referred to as “crows”) in Yolo County, California, between May 2012 and June 2014 and isolated using Amies clear gel collection and transport swabs (Remel BactiSwab; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Individual transport swabs were stored on ice (4 to 7°C) for 2 to 6 h prior to culture. Bacteria were isolated and identified at the VMTH as described previously (22) and in the paragraph below. All crow sampling was done using protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California, Davis (IACUC 16897). Primate sampling was done using fecal swabbing at the CNPRC during routine primate health care on primates for diarrhea/gastroenteritis in accordance with the approved protocols with the same methods and reagents as those used at the VMTH (described above and below), and Campylobacter isolates were given to this study from the CNPRC after bacterial isolation.

Campylobacter testing.

Campylobacter culture was performed from fecal samples inoculated onto 5% sheep blood agar (SBA) containing cefoperazone, vancomycin, and amphotericin B and from aborted fetus samples on 5% SBA containing amphotericin B and novobiocin (Campy CVA; Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA, USA). Plates were incubated at 37°C in microaerobic conditions (CampyGen; Oxoid Limited, Hampshire, United Kingdom) for 4 to 6 days, as described by Weis et al. (22). Bacterial colonies were Gram stained and subcultured onto 5% SBA (Hardy Diagnostics) for further characterization. Microaerobic isolates with a characteristic appearance on the culture medium and Gram stain (small, curved Gram-negative rods) that were catalase positive were identified as Campylobacter spp. and as C. jejuni if they hydrolyzed hippurate (Dalynn Biologicals Inc., Calgary, Canada). Additionally, each isolate was evaluated for susceptibility to nalidixic acid and cephalothin by using 30-μg antibiotic disks for further species confirmation (BD Biosciences, New Jersey, USA) (22).

Genomic analysis.

These genomes were part of the 100K Pathogen Genome Project using previously published methods (3745).

DNA extraction, library preparation, and next-generation sequencing.

High-molecular-weight genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from bacterial colonies grown on 5% SBA plates (UC Davis Vet Med Biological Services) at 37°C in microaerophilic conditions (as described above). DNA was extracted using whole-genome isolation kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) with previously published modifications (46). The bacterial cells were processed using the protocols of the 100K Pathogen Genome Project (UC Davis, Weimer laboratory) as previously described (4648). Briefly, bacteria were lysed with an enzyme preparation, vortexed, and processed according to the manufacturer's recommendations to obtain purified gDNA (Qiagen). Genomic DNA purity and integrity were assessed on the Agilent 2200 TapeStation with the genomic DNA ScreenTape (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) as previously described (38, 39, 42). Genomic DNA ratios that were greater than 1.8 for A260/280 and A260/230 were used for library construction.

Isolated gDNA was sheared using the Covaris E220 with the 96 microTube plate (Covaris, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA) (37). The fragmented DNA size was determined with the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 high-sensitivity DNA kit (Agilent Technologies) to confirm the normal size distribution around a 300-bp peak. Libraries were constructed using the KAPA HTP library preparation kit (KK8234, KR0426 [v3.13]; Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA) with dual surface plasmon resonance imaging (SPRI) size selection (40). Libraries were constructed using the Agilent Bravo option B (Agilent Technologies). Libraries were indexed using Bioo Scientific NEXTflex-96 DNA barcodes v13.05 (Bioo Scientific Corp., Austin, Texas, USA) and Integrated DNA Technologies Weimer 384 TS-LT DNA barcodes. Library quantification was done using the KAPA library quantification kit (KK4824; Kapa Biosystems) to ensure the final library concentration prior to normalization and pooling for sequencing (40). Sequencing was performed with BGI@UCDavis (BGI@UCDavis, Sacramento, CA, USA) using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform with PE100 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) or the Illumina HiSeq 3000 platform with PE150 at the UC Davis Genome Center (Davis, CA, USA) (43, 45).

Sequence assembly, annotation, and whole-genome analyses.

Assembly of paired-end reads was done with ABySS 1.5.2 using the following parameters: Kmer length = 64 (49). Annotations were done with the Prokka pipeline using the following parameters: –force –addgenes –compliant –genus Campylobacter –usegenus –rfam (50). Genomic distances were determined using the genome-to-genome distance calculator (GGDC), an in silico DNA-DNA hybridization (isDDH) technique, using the webserver at http://ggdc.dsmz.de/distcalc2.php as published previously (51, 52) and implemented locally as PanCake (53). The DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) model “formula 2” was used as is recommended for draft genomes. Distance matrices were translated into the Newick tree format with Trex webserver software using the neighbor-joining method (54, 55), and distance matrixes were clustered and visualized using the R statistical programming language (56). Single-gene (16S rRNA genes and cdtC) analyses were performed by extracting the sequences from each genome and aligning them using MUSCLE through Geneious (v6.1.8) to align sequences and generate phylogenetic trees (57, 58). Trees were edited using Dendroscope 3.0 (59). SplitsTree4 was used to compute trees and splits using the equal angle method with the “use weights” and “run convex hull” parameters (60).

Genome alignments were done using Mauve under progressiveMauve (61, 62). Contigs were reordered using the “reorder contigs” option in Mauve under the default parameters using C. jejuni subsp. jejuni NCTC 11168 as the reference genome, and then reordered genomes were aligned to each other using progressiveMauve. This publication made use of the Campylobacter MLST database (http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter) for in silico MLST (29).

Genomic assessment of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes.

Genomes were compared against a database (63, 64) consisting of virulence factor genes from six published Campylobacter genomes (Campylobacter fetus 82-40, C. jejuni 81-176, C. jejuni 81116, C. jejuni RM 11168, C. jejuni RM1221, and C. jejuni subsp. doylei 269.97) and plasmid C. jejuni 81-176 pVir. All published Campylobacter virulence factor genes were examined for each isolate to determine genotype variation; subsequently, five specific features associated with virulence and infection were selected for comparison and occurrence. These targets included (i) cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC, which code for cytolethal distending toxin (CDT), the main toxin in Campylobacter (6567); (ii) putative type IV secretion system (T4SS) virB genes, associated with invasion (68); (iii) secreted invasion proteins CiaB and FlaC (6971); and (iv) adherence genes jlpA, porA, pebA, and cadF (63, 72, 73). Virulence factor proteins were defined using the Pathogenic Bacterial Virulence Factor database (63, 64) using USEARCH (74) and by hand using previously published genes (7578) in Geneious using Prokka annotations.

Antibiotic resistance genes were analyzed in every genome using the Resistance Gene Identifier software and the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance database (CARD) (79). Using these tools, Campylobacter genomes were assessed for the presence of known antibiotic resistance genes (7578). Specifically, we examined each genome for five antibiotic resistance genes or operons that are relevant to Campylobacter antibiotic resistance: (i) the multidrug-resistant efflux complex CmeABC and its regulatory gene cmeR (76, 77); (ii) the MacAB efflux locus, which confers resistance to macrolides (79); (iii) the tetO locus, a ribosomal protection protein that confers resistance to tetracycline and its derivatives (75); (iv) the oxa-184 and oxa-61 genes, which are members of the class D β-lactamase family and confer resistance to β-lactam antibiotics (78); and (v) specific point mutations in the gyrA gene known to mediate resistance to fluoroquinolones in Campylobacter.

Accession number(s).

All raw genome sequences generated in this study are available in the NCBI SRA as part of the 100K Pathogen Genome Project under BioProject accession number PRJNA186441. Accession numbers are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material.

RESULTS

Assembly and annotation.

Each of the 160 sequenced Campylobacter genomes were assembled and annotated using ABySS and Prokka with the same settings and conditions (49, 50). The genomes of all three species ranged from 1,491,293 to 2,006,566 bp (the smallest being Campylobacter lari), with an average of 1,772,774 bp assembled in an average of 55 contigs per genome. They contained an average of 1,799 coding DNA sequences (CDS), 40 tRNAs per genome, and one transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA). For a full list of the genome structural details, see Table S1 in the supplemental material as well as the SRA accession numbers.

Each Campylobacter genome was examined for 16S rRNA genes sequence variation and MLST pattern, including the sequence type and clonal complex. However, the discriminative resolution in many cases was poor and inconclusive, particularly between some Campylobacter coli and C. jejuni 16S rRNA gene sequences (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Although indiscriminant in some sequences, this analysis did confirm the observations of Weis et al. (22), who observed a “crow-only” host clade.

MLST was considered the gold standard for genotyping an isolate in the pregenomics era; however, this method relies on the perfect match of an isolate from within the already existing database (29). If the sequence is not contained in the database, no assignment can be made and other methods are needed to determine the relationship. In this study, 100 C. jejuni and C. coli genomes matched known MLST patterns. Unfortunately, 60 genomes had no match in the database of commonly used housekeeping genes (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Consequently, further comparisons were done to determine specific similarities using the entire genome sequence and genome distances.

Whole-genome analysis.

Genome distance calculations resolved individual species into distinct groups of C. jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari (Fig. 1; see also Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). A phylogenetic tree constructed from the genome distances placed 83% (72/87) of the C. jejuni isolates from crow origin into a separate clade from those isolates obtained from primates or humans, while 17% (15/87) of the isolates from crows clustered closely with human, primate, and sheep C. jejuni (Fig. 1). This finding demonstrated that multiple genotypes exist within each bacterial species, and in the case of C. jejuni, it also resolved host origin, which may be evidence for host species adaptation. These observations confirm that the genome sequence has sufficient analytical resolution to link host range with genotype as observed previously in environmental samples using Vibrio spp. (80).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Genome distance calculations from draft genomes show two main groups within C. jejuni: a crow-only clade and a generalist clade (A). The generalist clade subset (B) shows C. jejuni isolates from a mixture of crow, primate, sheep, cow, goat, and human (GenBank) hosts. Tips are labeled with accession number (GenBank), strain name, source (when available), MLST (when available). Scale bar indicates genomic distance.

To further examine that link between genotype and host source, we used genome distance measurements to define two major groups within C. jejuni: (i) a crow-only cluster and (ii) a distinct cluster that contained isolates from many host species that we defined to be “generalists,” a concept similar to what other groups have previously defined for this organism (81, 82). The generalist group contains phylogenetically similar organisms obtained from seven different host species (Fig. 1). Several crow isolates were interspersed among the generalist C. jejuni clade. Notably, the genome distance of two crow isolates that clustered closely with human isolate C. jejuni ICDCCJ07001, an isolate known to cause GBS, suggests that crows may carry organisms that are responsible for this disease in humans. Similar relationships were observed for isolates that caused human gastroenteritis (i.e., C. jejuni M1) and isolates associated with abortion in livestock. Generalist genotypes that were linked closely to the three disease presentations were distinctly different from crow-only genotypes, warranting further examination of genomes to determine the specific genes and genotypes that were associated with the disease phenotype across the host range.

After careful investigation of the DDH analyses between the crow-only and generalist groups, it is possible that the isolates in the crow-only clade are potentially a novel third subspecies of C. jejuni. For instance, comparing two separate isolates from crows, BCW_3810 from the crow-only clade and BCW_6872 from the generalist clade, the DDH estimate is 74% (71% to 76.8%) where >70% is the same species. This indicates that the crow-only and the generalist isolates are both C. jejuni; however, the DDH estimate to belong to the same subspecies is 79%, leaving the crow-only isolate as a separate subspecies from the generalist C. jejuni subsp. jejuni isolate. Therefore, using this whole-genome analysis method, it is possible that these isolates are a separate subspecies.

Genome structure.

Genome synteny was examined in the 160 genomes sequenced in this study, with an additional 24 genomes (184 total comparisons) from the NCBI SRA that spanned host sources and disease phenotypes. This analysis found that the collection of genomes did not contain any major structural differences (e.g., inversions or translocations). As expected, structural alignments between isolates that were placed closely together using the genome distance analysis also aligned the closest structurally (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). Between the crow-only and the generalist clades, the genomes were more diverse between clades than within each clade, indicating that the major differences between each clade were at the level of allelic variation.

Whole-genome antibiotic resistance genotypes.

All Campylobacter genomes examined, regardless of clade, species, or host origin, contained the cmeABC efflux complex (data not shown), while 79.4% (127/160) contained the cmeR regulatory gene (Fig. 2) and all contained the macAB efflux loci (data not shown). The tetO locus, however, was found primarily in C. jejuni isolates from crows and ruminant abortion cases. In crow-derived C. jejuni, 23.7% (23/97) of genomes contain tetO, 65.2% (15/23) from the crow-only clade and 34.7% (8/23) from the generalist clade. Two C. jejuni isolates from primates in the generalist clade contained tetO. Almost all (91%, 10/11) abortion isolates contained tetO (Fig. 2). These results signify that tetO is widespread in abortion isolates (91% of the population was positive), is potentially linked to the disease phenotype, and may be useful in differentiating host specificity.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Genomic distance and antibiotic resistance genes. Dendrogram built from genomic distance calculations shows host in colored dots (key). The top arm of the dendrogram shows the C. jejuni isolates, and the bottom arm of the dendrogram shows the primate C. coli isolates. Tetracycline resistance gene tetO can be found predominantly in crow and sheep (abortive) isolates, and oxa-184 is found more often in crow populations whereas oxa-61 is found more often in the sheep and primate populations. Point mutations in gyrA are represented by purple, indicating Thr-Ile 86 mutation, and blue, indicating Thr-Val 86 (found only in C. lari). Gray indicates the presence of gyrA but no fluoroquinolone resistance-related SNP.

Out of the total genomes sequenced in this study, 84% of isolates contained class D β-lactamase genes. Of those, 55% (88/160) of the genomes contained the oxa-184 gene and 29.4% (47/160) contained the oxa-61 gene. Almost all C. jejuni isolates from crows contained oxa-184 (except for 5 generalists), whereas the C. jejuni isolates in the generalist clade typically contained oxa-61. The C. coli isolates from primates contained the oxa-61 loci (Fig. 2; see also Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). The two prominent β-lactamase genes (oxa-61 and oxa-184) were differentially present within the genomes and were indicative of host source.

Genomes were further examined for the presence of specific point mutations in gyrA known to mediate resistance to fluoroquinolones. Of the Campylobacter isolates from nonhuman primates, 32% contained a mutation that would result in a Thr-Ile 86 mutation in the GyrA protein, whereas only 4% of Campylobacter isolates from crows contained this mutation. Importantly, all Campylobacter isolates from crows with the gyrA mutation were from the generalist clade; none were identified in the crow-only clade (Fig. 2; see also Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). No other known substitutions in gyrA were found in the C. jejuni genomes; however, all three C. lari isolates from crows contained a Thr-Val 86 mutation as well. These results demonstrated that while Campylobacter isolates from crows (i.e., wildlife) contain fewer antibiotic resistance genes than Campylobacter isolates from agriculture-associated sources and captive animals, the presence of fluoroquinolone resistance genes in a small number of C. jejuni isolates from crows (all generalists) may be indicative of zoonotic transmission.

Whole-genome virulence loci analysis.

Virulence genes were specifically examined in conjunction with each Campylobacter isolate's host species (Table 1). Nearly all genomes (95%) contained one or more cytolethal distending toxin gene (cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC). All genomes contained genes associated with invasion (ciaB and flaC) and adherence genes (jlpA, porA, pebA, and cadF).

TABLE 1.

Occurrence of common virulence factors in 160 Campylobacter isolates sequenced in this study

Toxin type/function and gene
Frequency (%)
CDT toxin
    cdtA 96
    cdtB 95
    cdtC 97
Invasion
    ciaB 100
    flaC 100
Adherence
    cadF 100
    jlpA 100
    porA 100
    pebA 100
Type IV secretion system
    virB1 12
    virB2 17
    virB3 13
    virB4 31
    virB6 21
    virB8 21
    virB9 8
    virB10 20
    virB11 12

Genes involved in the type IV secretion system (T4SS) were identified much less frequently in these genomes than the other virulence genes that were studied. virB4 was present in 31% of genomes, while the remaining vir genes were found in only 8% to 21% of the evaluated genomes. Most T4SS genes were found in tandem with other T4SS genes in one genome (Table 1). Nearly all genomes were potentially pathogenic because of the presence of known virulence loci in all clades, suggesting that all 160 genomes are potentially pathogenic in humans.

Cytolethal distending toxin.

Since all loci were present, genomes were further investigated for specific point mutations within each virulence gene as a possible differentiation metric for virulence by host species. To evaluate the hypothesis that adherence molecules in Campylobacter may provide the critical difference between zoonotic and nonzoonotic species and can inform us of the origin and functional differences between the generalist and crow-only groupings, the membrane-binding protein CdtC that facilitates adhesion to the host cell and promotes cell entry of CdtB (6567) was specifically identified and examined as a candidate for this hypothesis. Alignments of cdtC from each genome revealed single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants that would lead to protein coding changes segregated by Campylobacter species. Within C. jejuni, cdtC allelic variation exactly recapitulated clades defined by whole-genome distance calculation into crow-only or generalist C. jejuni (Fig. 3). Differentiation of this gene into host-specific clades indicated that significant phenotypic differences can be explained by small changes in a single gene.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Alignment of CdtC sequences replicates the whole-genome phylogenetic tree and correctly splits species and clades. The cdtC nucleotide sequence was extracted from every genome, aligned, and built into a phylogenetic tree (A). Replicating the full genome tree, cdtC drives the separation between C. lari, C. coli, and between the C. jejuni generalists and the C. jejuni crow-only host grouping. Within the generalists, CdtC sequences from the abortion isolates are identical to those from select chickens, crows, and primates (B). Numbers represent bootstrapping, and the scale bar is at the bottom.

Analysis of CdtC protein alignment found specific amino acid changes separating the protein sequences into four main groups, i.e., C. coli, C. lari, and two groups with C. jejuni (generalist and crow only) (Fig. 3; see also Fig. S5 in the supplemental material). The CdtC alignment, when assessed for SNPs, revealed that the crow-only CdtC alleles were nearly identical. The generalist clade contained seven alleles of cdtC that coded for amino acid changes (Fig. 3A). All C. coli and C. lari cdtC alleles were identical within each bacterial species and were more similar to each other than to C. jejuni. This finding indicates that within C. jejuni, cdtC may be under evolutionary pressure in relation to host species colonization and transmission. This suggests that the allelic variation of cdtC may be a fundamental factor in disease after transmission and may impact zoonotic and disease phenotypes. We further hypothesized that a combination of adherence specialization and antibiotic selection may provide clues to zoonotic potential and disease potential.

Abortion isolates.

To test this hypothesis, we examined genomes from isolates that caused abortion in multiple livestock species. Previous studies demonstrate that abortive C. jejuni isolates are associated with the occurrence of tetO (83). We observed that 91% (10/11 isolates) of abortion cases contained tetO in the genome of the C. jejuni isolate. Only one abortion-associated C. jejuni isolate (BCW_6919) did not contain tetO (Fig. 2). When CdtC was assessed using the abortion isolates, the resultant phylogenetic tree was very similar to the genomic distance tree, and the CdtC variant was identical in all abortion isolates and genomic near-neighbors (Fig. 3B). Genomic distance calculations of the abortion isolates reveal several instances where C. jejuni isolates from crows, chickens, humans, and primates cluster with those that caused abortion (Fig. 4). Taken together, these data indicate that CdtC and TetO may play a more important role in disease than previously thought. This may have broad implications for pathogenicity, zoonotic transmission, and disease phenotype as highlighted by the findings for livestock abortion.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Genomic distance dendrogram of C. jejuni isolates implicated in causing abortion compared with GenBank C. jejuni from humans and with crow and primate isolates from this study. This dendrogram reveals greater than assumed genomic distance between those isolates with the same MLST and those thought to be clonal and shows two novel isolates from sheep and goats that associate more closely with a crow isolate and a chicken isolate from the Sacramento Valley. Tips are labeled as strain identifier, isolate source, and MLST (when available). Abortive C. jejuni isolates are indicated by stars.

DISCUSSION

This study describes the first large-scale (184 isolates) genomic comparison of Campylobacter isolates collected from wild birds, livestock, nonhuman primates, and humans. Whole-genome sequencing evaluation identified distinct clades within Campylobacter spp., particularly C. jejuni, and provided a much more robust vehicle for isolate comparison than 16S rRNA genes or MLST approaches, as additional molecular resolution was needed to uncover new discoveries for allelic variation and disease. While evidence of major structural alterations in genomes was not detected, gene-level differences were identified that may contribute to host adaptation and pathogenic potential. Since this tool clearly defined bacterial species, we hypothesized that this approach may be predictive of host source, especially when coupled with the metadata and genomic markers that link transmission capability, such as those in the generalist clade.

Nearly all (95%) of the isolates from crows, primates, and livestock contained loci associated with invasion and virulence. Although the exact mechanistic details of how C. jejuni invades human host cells and causes disease are still unclear, several virulence pathways have been implicated in C. jejuni pathogenesis. CDT is a holotoxin composed of three proteins, CdtA, CdtB, and CdtC, and has been shown to disrupt the host cell cycle, leading to cell arrest and even host cell death (6567, 84). The flagellar apparatus of C. jejuni consists of many proteins, including filament proteins FlaA and FlaB, and has been shown to act in motility of the bacteria and as a putative secretion system, secreting Cia (Campylobacter invasion antigen) proteins and FlaC into the host epithelial cells (6971, 84, 85). Type IV secretion system proteins typically encoded on plasmids (pVir) have been shown previously to contribute to virulence although their function is still unknown (68). The C. jejuni isolates in this study contained many of these virulence loci and can be characterized as potential pathogens by their genomes. Whether those virulence genes are expressed still needs to be determined. Phylogenetic analysis based on one protein sequence in particular (cdtC) recapitulated the full genome phylogenetic tree, which may indicate a role in each isolate's host predilection and zoonotic potential.

Our results show that several genomes from crows (17%; 15/87) displayed high similarity to sequences of isolates implicated in human disease, suggesting that these isolates are potential pathogens of public health importance and zoonotic transfer. The C. jejuni isolates from crows fell into two major clades: 83% (72/87) made up a crow-specific clade of C. jejuni, whereas 17% (15/87) was associated with other hosts and made up part of the generalist clade.

The Campylobacter isolates collected from macaques that were evaluated in this study were split between C. coli and C. jejuni. The C. coli isolates from primates all clustered together by genomic distance calculations and were very similar to one another (all 30 C. coli isolates were in the same C. coli clade). Most (81%; 13/16) of the primate C. jejuni isolates and all of the livestock isolates were members of the generalist clade. Campylobacter is widely accepted to be a genomically diverse group. However, we observed that the crow-only clade was very genomically similar, whereas the generalist clade contained four major clades that contain 60 different genotypes that are associated with multiple host sources. It is likely that these are the genomes that represent high diversity and likely high transmissibility.

Zhao et al. (86) recently found that the Campylobacter genotype, using WGS, is predictive of antibiotic resistance phenotypes using 114 isolates of Campylobacter (C. jejuni and C. coli) and 18 antibiotic resistance genes. They found between 95% and 100% correlation to phenotype. The findings of Zhao et al. provide additional evidence to verify that the antibiotic resistance genes and SNPs observed in this study may be predictive of phenotype from crow isolates. With this hypothesis, we examined all of the isolates from crows to find that they had either genes or SNPs associated with antibiotic resistance genes, and 85% of isolates contained class D β-lactamase genes. Specifically, 80% contained oxa-184 whereas 5% contained oxa-61. All five of the C. jejuni isolates from crows that contained oxa-61 were part of the generalist clade, whereas the crow-only clade only contained oxa-184. Over 23% of C. jejuni isolates from crows contained tetO, 4.5% of C. jejuni isolates from crows contained a gyrA SNP, and one isolate had both tetO and the gyrA SNP. From the generalist clade of C. jejuni isolates from crows, 53.3% (8/15) were positive for tetO and all four crow C. jejuni isolates with the gyrA SNP were from the generalist clade (26.6%; 4/15). Humans infected with C. jejuni are frequently treated with fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin) (87, 88). Because of this, food animals (post 2005) are no longer treated with fluoroquinolones in the United States (89). While the point mutations conferring resistance to fluoroquinolones were absent in chicken and livestock isolates, mutations were frequently identified in primate isolates (36.7% [11/30] of C. coli isolates and 25% [4/16] of C. jejuni isolates). Similarities between the generalists (32% of C. jejuni isolates) from crow, sympatric macaque, and sheep isolates suggest that transmission between avian, primate, and ungulate hosts can occur. The prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in isolates from a wide host range may pose a public health risk from this agent.

These results add to recent studies exploring the importance of wild birds in disseminating Campylobacter throughout a large geographic area (1315). Here, we have developed a method using genomics, antibiotic resistance markers, and specific virulence factors to detect isolates of pathogenic and zoonotic potential. Isolates in the generalist category contain clinically important antibiotic resistance genes and, through potential dissemination of Campylobacter isolates via crows, represent a risk to human and animal health and should be regarded as a public health threat. Further, we show that using the whole genome is more accurate and informative for phylogenetics, virulence, and antibiotic resistance assessment than all other previous forms of analysis.

In conclusion, this study demonstrated the power of population-scale WGS with Campylobacter isolates from wild bird populations, captive nonhuman primates, isolates from human infections, and livestock abortion isolates. This approach provided a robust and powerful method to determine genome-scale pathogenicity and the potential for zoonotic exchange in ecological settings to link disease and host range, where previously used molecular tools lacked the necessary resolution. Here, we showed that whole-genome distance calculations classified each species accurately. Further, C. jejuni isolates from crows segregated into two main clades, that of a crow-only clade not associated with disease and a generalist clade, which contained genomes from multiple hosts many of which were associated with disease (gastroenteritis, GBS, or abortion). Antibiotic resistance genes such as β-lactamases also segregated along the genome distance clades. This was also observed for cdtC, again, recapitulating the genome distance groupings. Remarkably, the isolates from livestock that caused abortion all contained the identical cdtC allele, implicating that this specific cdtC allele was unique to this livestock disease. Interestingly, tetO was found with all but one of the abortion cases, suggesting that cdtC and tetO may be coevolving to produce a generalist genome that is zoonotic and abortion linked. Use of WGS and population genomics provided a high-resolution view of Campylobacter genomes that was linked to host range, diseases, and possible zoonotic transmission genotypes.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to acknowledge Karen Pacheco and JoAnn Yee at the VMTH for their help with isolation and identification of crow Campylobacter isolates and Abigail Spinner at the CNPRC for primate isolates. We thank the 100K Pathogen Genome Project team. We also thank Walter Boyce and Woutrina Smith for collaborations and discussions.

Studies were funded in part by the University of California, Davis to Andrea K. Townsend, by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative under competitive grant no. 2014-67012-21622 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture to Conor C. Taff, and by the 100K Pathogen Genome Project under FDA grant no. 5U01FD003572-04.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01746-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Nachamkin I. 2003. Campylobacter and Arcobacter, p 902–914. In Murray E, Baron J, Jorgensen JH, Pfaller MA, Yolken RH (ed), Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Coker AO, Isokpehi RD, Thomas BN, Amisu KO, Obi CL. 2002. Human campylobacteriosis in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis 8:237–244. doi: 10.3201/eid0803.010233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sahin O, Fitzgerald C, Stroika S, Zhao S, Sippy RJ, Kwan P, Plummer PJ, Han J, Yaeger MJ, Zhang Q. 2012. Molecular evidence for zoonotic transmission of an emergent, highly pathogenic Campylobacter jejuni clone in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 50:680–687. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06167-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nielsen EM. 2002. Occurrence and strain diversity of thermophilic campylobacters in cattle of different age groups in dairy herds. Lett Appl Microbiol 35:85–89. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, Roy SL, Jones JL, Griffin PM. 2011. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States–major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 17:7–15. doi: 10.3201/eid1701.P11101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2012. Foodborne diseases active surveillance network (FoodNet): FoodNet surveillance report for 2011 (final report). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Altekruse SF, Stern NJ, Fields PI, Swerdlow DL. 1999. Campylobacter jejuni–an emerging foodborne pathogen. Emerg Infect Dis 5:28–35. doi: 10.3201/eid0501.990104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Young KT, Davis LM, DiRita VJ. 2007. Campylobacter jejuni: molecular biology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:665–679. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Potter ME, Blaser MJ, Sikes RK, Kaufmann AF, Wells JG. 1983. Human Campylobacter infection associated with certified raw milk. Am J Epidemiol 117:475–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gardner TJ, Fitzgerald C, Xavier C, Klein R, Pruckler J, Stroika S, McLaughlin JB. 2011. Outbreak of campylobacteriosis associated with consumption of raw peas. Clin Infect Dis 53:26–32. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kwan PSL, Xavier C, Santovenia M, Pruckler J, Stroika S, Joyce K, Gardner T, Fields PI, McLaughlin J, Tauxe RV, Fitzgerald C. 2014. Multilocus sequence typing confirms wild birds as the source of a Campylobacter outbreak associated with the consumption of raw peas. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:4540–4546. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00537-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Multistate outbreak of Campylobacter jejuni infections associated with undercooked chicken livers–northeastern United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62:874–876. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Broman T, Palmgren H, Bergstrom S, Sellin M, Waldenstrom J, Danielsson-Tham ML, Olsen B. 2002. Campylobacter jejuni in black-headed gulls (Larus ridibundus): prevalence, genotypes, and influence on C. jejuni epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol 40:4594–4602. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.12.4594-4602.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Broman T, Waldenstrom J, Dahlgren D, Carlsson I, Eliasson I, Olsen B. 2004. Diversities and similarities in PFGE profiles of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from migrating birds and humans. J Appl Microbiol 96:834–843. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Waldenstrom J, Broman T, Carlsson I, Hasselquist D, Achterberg RP, Wagenaar JA, Olsen B. 2002. Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter lari, and Campylobacter coli in different ecological guilds and taxa of migrating birds. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5911–5917. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.12.5911-5917.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Palmer SR, Gully PR, White JM, Pearson AD, Suckling WG, Jones DM, Rawes JC, Penner JL. 1983. Water-borne outbreak of campylobacter gastroenteritis. Lancet i:287–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pearson BM, Gaskin DJ, Segers RP, Wells JM, Nuijten PJ, van Vliet AH. 2007. The complete genome sequence of Campylobacter jejuni strain 81116 (NCTC11828). J Bacteriol 189:8402–8403. doi: 10.1128/JB.01404-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Friis C, Wassenaar TM, Javed MA, Snipen L, Lagesen K, Hallin PF, Newell DG, Toszeghy M, Ridley A, Manning G, Ussery DW. 2010. Genomic characterization of Campylobacter jejuni strain M1. PLoS One 5:e12253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bang DD, Nielsen EM, Scheutz F, Pedersen K, Handberg K, Madsen M. 2003. PCR detection of seven virulence and toxin genes of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates from Danish pigs and cattle and cytolethal distending toxin production of the isolates. J Appl Microbiol 94:1003–1014. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01926.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Colles FM, McCarthy ND, Howe JC, Devereux CL, Gosler AG, Maiden MC. 2009. Dynamics of Campylobacter colonization of a natural host, Sturnus vulgaris (European starling). Environ Microbiol 11:258–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01773.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fouts DE, Mongodin EF, Mandrell RE, Miller WG, Rasko DA, Ravel J, Brinkac LM, DeBoy RT, Parker CT, Daugherty SC, Dodson RJ, Durkin AS, Madupu R, Sullivan SA, Shetty JU, Ayodeji MA, Shvartsbeyn A, Schatz MC, Badger JH, Fraser CM, Nelson KE. 2005. Major structural differences and novel potential virulence mechanisms from the genomes of multiple Campylobacter species. PLoS Biol 3:e15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Weis AM, Miller WA, Byrne BA, Chouicha N, Boyce WM, Townsend AK. 2014. Prevalence and pathogenic potential of Campylobacter isolates from free-living, human-commensal American crows. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:1639–1644. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03393-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Parkhill J, Wren BW, Mungall K, Ketley JM, Churcher C, Basham D, Chillingworth T, Davies RM, Feltwell T, Holroyd S, Jagels K, Karlyshev AV, Moule S, Pallen MJ, Penn CW, Quail MA, Rajandream MA, Rutherford KM, van Vliet AHM, Whitehead S, Barrell BG. 2000. The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences. Nature 403:665–668. doi: 10.1038/35001088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Romaniuk PJ, Trust TJ. 1989. Rapid identification of Campylobacter species using oligonucleotide probes to 16S ribosomal RNA. Mol Cell Probes 3:133–142. doi: 10.1016/0890-8508(89)90024-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hug LA, Baker BJ, Anantharaman K, Brown CT, Probst AJ, Castelle CJ, Butterfield CN, Hernsdorf AW, Amano Y, Ise K, Suzuki Y, Dudek N, Relman DA, Finstad KM, Amundson R, Thomas BC, Banfield JF. 2016. A new view of the tree of life. Nat Microbiol 1:16048. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nielsen LN, Sheppard SK, McCarthy ND, Maiden MC, Ingmer H, Krogfelt KA. 2010. MLST clustering of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from patients with gastroenteritis, reactive arthritis and Guillain-Barre syndrome. J Appl Microbiol 108:591–599. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04444.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Magnusson SH, Guethmundsdottir S, Reynisson E, Runarsson AR, Harethardottir H, Gunnarson E, Georgsson F, Reiersen J, Marteinsson VT. 2011. Comparison of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from human, food, veterinary and environmental sources in Iceland using PFGE, MLST and fla-SVR sequencing. J Appl Microbiol 111:971–981. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05100.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kittl S, Heckel G, Korczak BM, Kuhnert P. 2013. Source attribution of human Campylobacter isolates by MLST and fla-typing and association of genotypes with quinolone resistance. PLoS One 8:e81796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jolley KA, Maiden MCJ. 2010. BIGSdb: scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics 11:595. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhou YZ, Bu LJ, Guo M, Zhou CR, Wang YD, Chen LY, Liu J. 2013. Comprehensive genomic characterization of Campylobacter genus reveals some underlying mechanisms for its genomic diversification. PLoS One 8(8):e70241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mdegela RH, Nonga HE, Ngowi HA, Kazwala RR. 2006. Prevalence of thermophilic Campylobacter infections in humans, chickens and crows in Morogoro, Tanzania. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 53:116–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.00926.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ganapathy K, Saleha AA, Jaganathan M, Tan CG, Chong CT, Tang SC, Ideris A, Dare CM, Bradbury JM. 2007. Survey of Campylobacter, Salmonella and Mycoplasmas in house crows (Corvus splendens) in Malaysia. Vet Rec 160:622–624. doi: 10.1136/vr.160.18.622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Matsuda MST, Itoh Y, Takiguchi M, Furuhata K, Moore JE, Murayama O, Fukuyama M. 2002. First isolation of urease-positive thermophilic Campylobacter (UPTC) from crows (Corvus levaillantii) in Japan. Int J Hyg Environ Health 205:321–324. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ito K, Kubokura Y, Kaneko K, Totake Y, Ogawa M. 1988. Occurrence of Campylobacter jejuni in free-living wild birds from Japan. J Wildl Dis 24:467–470. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-24.3.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Keller JI, Shriver WG, Waldenstrom J, Griekspoor P, Olsen B. 2011. Prevalence of Campylobacter in wild birds of the Mid-Atlantic region, USA. J Wildl Dis 47:750–754. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-47.3.750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Taff CC, Weis AM, Wheeler S, Hinton MG, Weimer BC, Barker C, Jones M, Logsdon R, Smith WA, Boyce WM, Townsend A. 3 June 2016. Influence of host ecology and behavior on Campylobacter jejuni prevalence and environmental contamination risk in a synanthropic wild bird. Appl Environ Microbiol doi: 10.1128/AEM.01456-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jeannotte R, Lee E, Arabyan N, Kong N, Thao K, Huang BH, Kelly L, Weimer BC. 2014. Optimization of Covaris settings for shearing bacterial genomic DNA by focused ultrasonication and analysis using Agilent 2200 TapeStation. Application note 5991-5075EN. Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jeannotte R, Lee E, Kong N, Ng W, Kelly L, Weimer BC. 2014. High-throughput analysis of foodborne bacterial genomic DNA using Agilent 2200 TapeStation and genomic DNA ScreenTape system. Application note 5991-4003EN. Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kong N, Ng W, Cai L, Leonardo A, Kelly L, Weimer BC. 2014. Integrating the DNA integrity number (DIN) to assess genomic DNA (gDNA) quality control using the Agilent 2200 TapeStation system. Application note 5991-5442EN. Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kong N, Ng W, Foutouhi A, Huang BH, Kelly L, Weimer BC. 2014. Quality control of high-throughput library construction pipeline for KAPA HTP library using an Agilent 2200 TapeStation. Application note 5991-5141EN. Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kong N, Ng W, Kelly L, Weimer BC. 2015. Quality control of library construction pipeline for PacBio SMRTbell 10 kb library using an Agilent 2200 TapeStation system. Application note 5991-6521EN. Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kong N, Ng W, Lee V, Kelly L, Weimer BC. 2013. Production and analysis of high molecular weight genomic DNA for NGS pipelines using Agilent DNA extraction kit (p/n 200600). Application note 5991-3722EN. Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kong N, Thao K, Huang C, Appel M, Lappin S, Knapp L, Kelly L, Weimer BC. 2014. Automated library construction using KAPA library preparation kits on the Agilent NGS workstation yields high-quality libraries for whole-genome sequencing on the Illumina platform. Application note 5991-4296EN. Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kong N, Thao K, Ng W, Kim KS, Korlach J, Hickey L, Kelly L, Lappin S, Weimer BC. 2014. Automation of PacBio SMRTbell 10 kb template preparation on an Agilent NGS workstation. Application note 5991-4482EN. Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Miller B, Kets VV, Rooyen BV, Whitehorn H, Jones P, Ranik M, Geldart A, Walt EVD, Appel M, Kong N, Huang BH, Storey D, Weimer BC. 2015. A novel, single tube enzymatic fragmentation and library construction method enables fast turnaround times and improved data quality for microbial whole-genome sequencing. Technical note APP109001. Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ludeke CH, Kong N, Weimer BC, Fischer M, Jones JL. 2015. Complete genome sequences of a clinical isolate and an environmental isolate of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Genome Announc 3:e00216-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Heithoff DM, Shimp WR, House JK, Xie Y, Weimer BC, Sinsheimer RL, Mahan MJ. 2012. Intraspecies variation in the emergence of hyperinfectious bacterial strains in nature. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002647. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ganesan B, Dobrowolski P, Weimer BC. 2006. Identification of the leucine-to-2-methylbutyric acid catabolic pathway of Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4264–4273. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00448-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Simpson JT, Wong K, Jackman SD, Schein JE, Jones SJM, Birol I. 2009. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res 19:1117–1123. doi: 10.1101/gr.089532.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Goker M. 2010. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2:117–134. doi: 10.4056/sigs.531120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Goker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Weimer BC. 2016. PanCake: Narya. Zenodo, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Boc A, Diallo AB, Makarenkov V. 2012. T-REX: a web server for inferring, validating and visualizing phylogenetic trees and networks. Nucleic Acids Res 40:W573–W579. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.R Core Team. 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Huson DH, Scornavacca C. 2012. Dendroscope 3: an interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Syst Biol 61:1061–1067. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23:254–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. 2004. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 14:1394–1403. doi: 10.1101/gr.2289704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chen LH, Yang J, Yu J, Ya ZJ, Sun LL, Shen Y, Jin Q. 2005. VFDB: a reference database for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D325–D328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chen LH, Xiong ZH, Sun LL, Yang J, Jin Q. 2012. VFDB 2012 update: toward the genetic diversity and molecular evolution of bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D641–D645. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Elwell CA, Dreyfus LA. 2000. DNase I homologous residues in CdtB are critical for cytolethal distending toxin-mediated cell cycle arrest. Mol Microbiol 37:952–963. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02070.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pickett CL, Pesci EC, Cottle DL, Russell G, Erdem AN, Zeytin H. 1996. Prevalence of cytolethal distending toxin production in Campylobacter jejuni and relatedness of Campylobacter sp. cdtB gene. Infect Immun 64:2070–2078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sert V, Cans C, Tasca C, Bret-Bennis L, Oswald E, Ducommun B, De Rycke J. 1999. The bacterial cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) triggers a G2 cell cycle checkpoint in mammalian cells without preliminary induction of DNA strand breaks. Oncogene 18:6296–6304. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bacon DJ, Alm RA, Burr DH, Hu L, Kopecko DJ, Ewing CP, Trust TJ, Guerry P. 2000. Involvement of a plasmid in virulence of Campylobacter jejuni 81-176. Infect Immun 68:4384–4390. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.8.4384-4390.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Song YC, Jin S, Louie H, Ng D, Lau R, Zhang Y, Weerasekera R, Al Rashid S, Ward LA, Der SD, Chan VL. 2004. FlaC, a protein of Campylobacter jejuni TGH9011 (ATCC 43431) secreted through the flagellar apparatus, binds epithelial cells and influences cell invasion. Mol Microbiol 53:541–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04175.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Konkel ME, Kim BJ, Rivera-Amill V, Garvis SG. 1999. Bacterial secreted proteins are required for the internalization of Campylobacter jejuni into cultured mammalian cells. Mol Microbiol 32:691–701. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01376.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Neal-McKinney JM, Konkel ME. 2012. The Campylobacter jejuni CiaC virulence protein is secreted from the flagellum and delivered to the cytosol of host cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Jin S, Joe A, Lynett J, Hani EK, Sherman P, Chan VL. 2001. JlpA, a novel surface-exposed lipoprotein specific to Campylobacter jejuni, mediates adherence to host epithelial cells. Mol Microbiol 39:1225–1236. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2001.02294.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Islam A, Raghupathy R, Albert MJ. 2010. Recombinant PorA, the major outer membrane protein of Campylobacter jejuni, provides heterologous protection in an adult mouse intestinal colonization model. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17:1666–1671. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00255-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Edgar RC. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Manavathu EK, Hiratsuka K, Taylor DE. 1988. Nucleotide-sequence analysis and expression of a tetracycline-resistance gene from Campylobacter jejuni. Gene 62:17–26. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90576-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lin J, Akiba M, Sahin O, Zhang QJ. 2005. CmeR functions as a transcriptional repressor for the multidrug efflux pump CmeABC in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:1067–1075. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.3.1067-1075.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lin J, Michel LO, Zhang QJ. 2002. CmeABC functions as a multidrug efflux system in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:2124–2131. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.7.2124-2131.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Alfredson DA, Korolik V. 2005. Isolation and expression of a novel molecular class D beta-lactamase, OXA-61, from Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:2515–2518. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.6.2515-2518.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.McArthur AG, Waglechner N, Nizam F, Yan A, Azad MA, Baylay AJ, Bhullar K, Canova MJ, De Pascale G, Ejim L, Kalan L, King AM, Koteva K, Morar M, Mulvey MR, O'Brien JS, Pawlowski AC, Piddock LJV, Spanogiannopoulos P, Sutherland AD, Tang I, Taylor PL, Thaker M, Wang WL, Yan M, Yu T, Wright GD. 2013. The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3348–3357. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00419-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Shapiro BJ, Friedman J, Cordero OX, Preheim SP, Timberlake SC, Szabo G, Polz MF, Alm EJ. 2012. Population genomics of early events in the ecological differentiation of bacteria. Science 336:48–51. doi: 10.1126/science.1218198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Dearlove BL, Cody AJ, Pascoe B, Meric G, Wilson DJ, Sheppard SK. 2016. Rapid host switching in generalist Campylobacter strains erodes the signal for tracing human infections. ISME J 10:721–729. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sheppard SK, Cheng L, Meric G, de Haan CPA, Llarena AK, Marttinen P, Vidal A, Ridley A, Clifton-Hadley F, Connor TR, Strachan NJC, Forbes K, Colles FM, Jolley KA, Bentley SD, Maiden MCJ, Hanninen ML, Parkhill J, Hanage WP, Corander J. 2014. Cryptic ecology among host generalist Campylobacter jejuni in domestic animals. Mol Ecol 23:2442–2451. doi: 10.1111/mec.12742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sahin O, Plummer PJ, Jordan DM, Sulaj K, Pereira S, Robbe-Austerman S, Wang L, Yaeger MJ, Hoffman LJ, Zhang Q. 2008. Emergence of a tetracycline-resistant Campylobacter jejuni clone associated with outbreaks of ovine abortion in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 46:1663–1671. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00031-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wassenaar TM, Bleumink-Pluym NM, van der Zeijst BA. 1991. Inactivation of Campylobacter jejuni flagellin genes by homologous recombination demonstrates that flaA but not flaB is required for invasion. EMBO J 10:2055–2061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Konkel ME, Klena JD, Rivera-Amill V, Monteville MR, Biswas D, Raphael B, Mickelson J. 2004. Secretion of virulence proteins from Campylobacter jejuni is dependent on a functional flagellar export apparatus. J Bacteriol 186:3296–3303. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.11.3296-3303.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhao S, Tyson GH, Chen Y, Li C, Mukherjee S, Young S, Lam C, Folster JP, Whichard JM, McDermott PF. 2015. Whole-genome sequencing analysis accurately predicts antimicrobial resistance phenotypes in Campylobacter spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:459–466. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02873-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Dryden MS, Gabb RJ, Wright SK. 1996. Empirical treatment of severe acute community-acquired gastroenteritis with ciprofloxacin. Clin Infect Dis 22:1019–1025. doi: 10.1093/clinids/22.6.1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Allos BM. 2001. Campylobacter jejuni infections: update on emerging issues and trends. Clin Infect Dis 32:1201–1206. doi: 10.1086/319760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Nelson JM, Chiller TM, Powers JH, Angulo FJ. 2007. Fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter species and the withdrawal of fluoroquinolones from use in poultry: a public health success story. Clin Infect Dis 44:977–980. doi: 10.1086/512369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES